33
Approved regimens for cirrhotic patients Amsterdam, 4-5 december 2015 5th Workshop on HCV THERAPY ADVANCES New antivirals in clinical practice

Approved regimens for cirrhotic patientsregist2.virology-education.com/2015/5thHCVadv/02_Berenguer.pdf · Approved regimens for cirrhotic patients Amsterdam, 4-5 december 2015

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Approved regimens for cirrhotic patients

    Amsterdam, 4-5 december 2015

    5th Workshop on HCV THERAPY ADVANCES New antivirals in clinical practice

  • 0

    50000

    100000

    150000

    200000

    250000

    300000

    350000

    400000

    1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

    Num

    ber o

    f cas

    es

    Year

    F0

    F1

    F2

    F3

    F4 ans its complications

    Deuffic-Burban et al, Gastroenterology 2012

    Peak cirrhosis and its complications

    2030

    In the next 10 yrs, the number of decompensated cirrhosis will increase by 4.

    Disease burden in Spain

  • Case 1. Fibrosis 4

    63 yrs old man. HCV genotype 1b. Naïve. Asymptomatic

    Blood transfusion 35 yrs before Liver biopsy 20 yrs before: chronic active hepatitis

    Fibroscan: 15 kpas Elevated transaminases (ALT 87 IU, AST 68 IU)

    Upper endoscopy: normal Lack of comorbidities

    3 cm HCC detected on screening US-------RF-----Complete RX response

  • Case 1. Fibrosis 4

    63 yrs old man. HCV genotype 1b. Treatment experienced* Asymptomatic

    Blood transfusion 35 yrs before Liver biopsy 20 yrs before: chronic active hepatitis

    Fibroscan: 15 kpas Elevated transaminases (ALT 87 IU, AST 68 IU)

    Upper endoscopy: normal Lack of comorbidities

    *- 2005: pegIFN + RBV at optimal doses----Partial Response - 2012: Triple therapy with telaprevir, pegIFN, RBV---- Response with relapse

    HCV genotype 1a

  • Case 2. Compensated cirrhosis with portal HPT

    63 yrs old man. HCV genotype 1a. IL28B CT. Asymptomatic

    Two prior failed therapies: - 2005: pegIFN + RBV at optimal doses----Partial Response - 2012: Triple therapy with telaprevir, pegIFN, RBV---- Response with relapse

    Fibroscan: 19 kpas Upper endoscopy: small EV

    Laboratory tests: ALT 87 IU, AST 68 IU, GGT 69 IU, Hgb 12.5 g/dl, platelet count 78,000/u Child A, MELD score 8

    Comorbidities: IDDM, depression (citalopram)

  • Case 3. Decompensated cirrhosis

    HCV genotype 1a. IL28B CT. Two prior failed therapies:

    - 2007: pegIFN + RBV at optimal doses----Null Response - 2011: Triple therapy with telaprevir, pegIFN, RBV----premature D/C.

    Relapse

    Upper endoscopy: large EV (prophylaxis - B-blocker) Ascites (spironolactone 200 mg + furosemide 40 mg/day)

    Laboratory tests: ALT 87 IU, AST 68 IU, GGT 69 IU, Hgb 11.5 g/dl, platelet count 30,000/u; Bilirubin 3.2 mg/dl, Albumin 2.7 mg/dl, INR

    1.7, creatinine 1.5 mg/dl MELD score 20, Child C

  • Natural history of HCV cirrhosis

    Modified from Friedman SL. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1655–69

    HCS: hyperdynamic circulatory status; HE: hepatic encephalopathy; HRS: hepatorrenal syndrome; HVPG: hepatic venous gradient; RA: refractory ascites; SBP: spontaenous bacterial peritonitis;

    Major Descompensation

    Recurrent variceal bleeding, HRS, SBP

    Insoluble scar

    Clinical

    Symptoms

    Histology

    F1–F3 F4 (Cirrosis)

    HVPG

    Biology

    Hemodynamic

    HCS

    Functional

    No cirrhosis

    None

    Compensated

    None (no varices)

    Scar & cross linking

    Compensated

    No (varices present)

    Thick scars & nodules

    Decompensated

    Ascites, variceal bleeding, EH

    Insoluble scar

    Increasing fibrogenesis

    ≥10 ≥12 >20

    Increasing vasodilatation

    Worsening liver function

    >6

    Fibrogenesis and neovascularization

  • Agenda

    Aims / Benefits of antiviral therapy in the cirrhotic population

    Treatment of the cirrhotic patient with DAAs

  • Agenda

    Aims / Benefits of antiviral therapy in the cirrhotic population

    Treatment of the cirrhotic patient with DAAs

  • Goals of antiviral therapy in the cirrhotic population

    Compensated cirrhosis: Reduce rates of decompensation Reduce rates of HCC development/HCC recurrence? Reversal of cirrhosis

    Decompensated cirrhosis:

    Improve survival while in the WL for LT Prevent HCV recurrence post-LT Improve clinical condition and reduce the need for LT

  • HCV & Therapy: effects on outcome

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    Pretreatment Postreatment

    D’Ambrosio R, et al. Hepatology. 2012;56:532-543.

    F4 F3

    F2 F1 Changes in Fibrosis

    N=530

    van der Meer AJ, et al. JAMA. 2012; 308(24):2584-2593

    HCC (n=307)

    Liver-Related Complications* (n=307)

    *Ascites, variceal bleeding. 307 HCV patients with bridging fibrosis (n=127) or cirrhosis (n=180) Non-SVR in 67% of patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Median follow-up: 3.5 years.

    Cumulative Incidence (%

    )

    Follow-Up (years)

    SVR

    Cumulative Incidence (%

    )

    Follow-Up (years)

    Non-SVR

    P

  • Effect of SVR on the risk of LT, HCC, death Meta-analysis of 129 studies in 34.563 patients with HCV

    (mean FU ≈5 yrs)

    Hill et al, AASLD 2014 (abst 44)

    LT

    HCC

    Death

    SVR NR

  • Agenda

    Aims / Benefits of antiviral therapy in the cirrhotic population

    Treatment of the cirrhotic patient with DAAs

  • Treatment of the compensated cirrhotic patient with DAAs

    Compensated cirrhosis

    PK profile of treatment

    HCV genotype

    Prior treatment response

    Patient comorbidities (i.e: renal

    impairment,..)

    Drug-Drug interactions

    Severity of liver

    impairment

  • Possible Mechanisms for Decreased Response in Cirrhosis

    •Drug toxicity Increased adverse events with early discontinuation

    •Drug delivery Intrahepatic shunting with decreased exposure in hepatocytes

    •Drug uptake/metabolism Altered cytochrome p450 function

    •Altered Immune function Reduced Kuppfer cell mass Altered cytokine milieu

  • 493/513

    SV

    R12

    (%)

    305/322 188/191

    Overall 12 Weeks 24 Weeks

    21

    • Of 513 patients, 20 failed to achieve SVR12 – 18 relapsed – 1 LTFU, 1 death (presumed infection)

    SOF/LDV ± RBV 12-24 weeks

    Bourliere M, AASLD 2014

    Gráfico1

    Overall1.62

    12 Weeks1.93.3

    24 Weeks1.72.5

    SVR12 Gt 2

    96

    95

    98

    Sheet1

    SVR12 Gt 2hilohilo

    Overall961.6297.694

    12 Weeks951.93.396.991.7

    24 Weeks981.72.599.795.5

  • Total Treatment

    Naïve Treatment

    Experienced

    Overall SVR12

    Duration 12 wk

    24 wk

    Regimen LDV/SOF

    LDV/SOF + RBV

    Duration/ ± RBV

    LDV/SOF 12 wk

    LDV/SOF + RBV 12 wk

    LDV/SOF 24 wk

    LDV/SOF + RBV 24 wk

    SOF/LDV ± RBV 12-24 weeks

    SVR12, %

    96% 98% 95%

    95% 97% 94%

    98% 99% 98%

    95% 96% 95%

    97% 99% 96%

    92% 96% 90%

    96% 98% 96%

    98% 97% 98%

    100% 100% 100%

    22

    Gráfico1

    97.51.83.7

    96.72.65.9

    98.61.46.4

    96.32.96.9

    98.81.25.5

    95.73.810.2

    97.82.19.6

    972.912.8

    10009.7

    0��

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Forest Plot

    Treatment Naïve: SVR12CI lowerCI upperRateCI lowerCI upperlowerupper

    Overall997.593.899.33.71.8

    Duration 12896.790.899.35.92.6

    Duration 24wk798.692.21006.41.4

    Regimen LDV/SOF696.389.499.26.92.9

    Regimen LDV/SOF + RBV598.893.31005.51.2

    Duration 12wk495.785.599.510.23.8

    w/ RBV 12wk397.888.299.99.62.1

    24wk29784.299.912.82.9

    w/ RBV 24wk110090.31009.70

    0

    Forest Plot

    99.390.8

    10092.2

    99.289.4

    10093.3

    99.585.5

    99.988.2

    99.984.2

    10090.3

    ��

    Plan1

    This work is licensed under a Creative Common license Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0).

    More information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

    Permission to use program if source is cited. Neyeloff J, Fuchs S, Moreira L. Meta-analyses and forest plots using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:52.

    More information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

    Gráfico1

    96.11.52.1

    94.72.23

    98.41.32.9

    95.22.33.4

    96.91.82.8

    92.44.16.4

    96.12.23.7

    97.71.84.2

    10006.2

    0��

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Forest Plot

    Total: SVR12CI lowerCI upperRateCI lowerCI upperlowerupper

    Overall996.19497.62.11.5

    Duration 12894.791.796.932.2

    Duration 24wk798.495.599.72.91.3

    Regimen LDV/SOF695.291.897.53.42.3

    Regimen LDV/SOF + RBV596.994.198.72.81.8

    Duration 12wk492.48696.56.44.1

    w/ RBV 12wk396.192.498.33.72.2

    24wk297.793.599.54.21.8

    w/ RBV 24wk110093.81006.20

    0

    Forest Plot

    96.991.7

    99.795.5

    97.591.8

    98.794.1

    96.586

    98.392.4

    99.593.5

    10093.8

    ��

    Plan1

    This work is licensed under a Creative Common license Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0).

    More information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

    Permission to use program if source is cited. Neyeloff J, Fuchs S, Moreira L. Meta-analyses and forest plots using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:52.

    More information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

    Gráfico1

    95.51.92.8

    93.92.73.9

    98.41.44.2

    94.72.94.5

    96.12.33.9

    90.15.89.4

    95.62.64.5

    981.85

    100015.4

    0��

    9

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    Forest Plot

    Treatment Experienced: SVR12CI lowerCI upperRateCI lowerCI upperlowerupper

    Overall995.592.797.42.81.9

    Duration 12893.99096.63.92.7

    Duration 24wk798.494.299.84.21.4

    Regimen LDV/SOF694.790.297.64.52.9

    Regimen LDV/SOF + RBV596.192.298.43.92.3

    Duration 12wk490.180.795.99.45.8

    w/ RBV 12wk395.691.198.24.52.6

    24wk2989399.851.8

    w/ RBV 24wk110084.610015.40

    0

    Forest Plot

    96.690

    99.894.2

    97.690.2

    98.492.2

    95.980.7

    98.291.1

    99.893

    10084.6

    ��

    Plan1

    This work is licensed under a Creative Common license Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0).

    More information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

    Permission to use program if source is cited. Neyeloff J, Fuchs S, Moreira L. Meta-analyses and forest plots using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:52.

    More information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

  • HCV Subtype 1a Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1973-82

    92.2

    12-week arm

    24-week arm

    92.9

    Naïve Prior Relapse Response

    3D + RBV

    SVR1

    2, %

    Pat

    ient

    s

    59/64 14/15 52/56 13/13

    93.3 100 100 100 80.0 92.9

    11/11 40/50 10/10 39/42

    Prior Partial Response

    Prior Null Response

    3D: ABT-450/ ritonavir/ombitasvir, 150 mg/100 mg/25 mg qd; dasabuvir, 250 mg bid RBV: 1000-1200 mg/d

    SVR in HCV GT1 treatment-naive and experienced cirrhotic patients

    Turquoise II

  • Zeuzem S et al. N Engl J Med 2014

    Noncirrhotic

    212/250 12/13

    94

    86/92 Naïve,

    Noncirrhotic

    87

    87/100 Experienced, Noncirrhotic

    92

    Naïve, Cirrhotic

    60

    27/45 Experienced,

    Cirrhotic

    SVR12 (%

    )

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100 85

    Overall

    212/250

    Overall

    Cirrhotic

    Sofosbuvir + RBV for G3 24 weeks therapy

    Valence

  • ALLY-3: DCV+SOF 12 weeks SVR12

    Nelson DR, et al. Hepatology. 2015. 2015;61:1127-1135.

    96 97 94

    63 58

    69

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Present Absent Present Absent Present Absent

    b

    SVR

    12 (

    %)a

    Naïve Pretreated All Patients

    105 109

    20 32

    73 75

    11 19

    32 34

    9 13

    Cirrhosisc

    aHCV-RNA14.6 kPa), or FibroTest ≥0.75 & APRI >2 in 141 patients,; 11 patients had non conclusive results

    (FibroTest between >0.48 & 1 - ≤2).

  • ALLY-3+: SOF+DCV+RBV 12 vs 16 wks SVR12: Patients with Cirrhosis

    ALLY-3+

    ITT ANALYSIS

    VBTa 0 0 0 Relapseb 4 2 2 Deathc 1 1 0

    VBT 0 0 0 Relapse 4 2 2

    OBSERVED ANALYSIS

    0102030405060708090

    10089 88 89

    16 18

    Overall 12 Weeks 16 Weeks HC

    V RN

    A <

    LLO

    QTD

    /TN

    D (%

    )

    31 35

    15 17

    0102030405060708090

    100

    15 18

    16 18

    86 83 89

    Overall 12 Weeks 16 Weeks

    HCV

    RNA

    < LL

    OQ

    TD/T

    ND

    (%)

    31 36

    27

    a VBT (virologic breakthrough): confirmed HCV RNA ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL above nadir, or ≥ LLOQ if previously < LLOQ TD or TND; b Relapse: confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ at any posttreatment visit following < LLOQTND at end of treatment; c Dilated cardiomyopathy on Day 72, not related to treatment; cirrhosis status diagnosed by liver biopsy (F4) n = 9; FibroScan ≥ 14.6, n = 27.

  • DCV+SOF±RBV in GT-3 SVR4 in advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis

    (French ATU GT3) Hezode et al. Poster LP05. EASL 2015

    76 88 92 83

    0102030405060708090

    100

    DCV + SOF ± RBV 12 weeks

    DCV + SOF ± RBV 24 weeks

    Cirrhosis No cirrhosis

    SVR-

    4, %

    22/29 11/12 52/59 5/6

    (N=106)

  • Genotype 1 Treatment

    Population LDV/SOF OMV/PTV/RTV + DSV SMV + SOF GT 1a, no cirrhosis 12 wks 12 wks + RBV 12 wks ± RBV GT 1a, cirrhosis 12 wks 24 wks + RBV 24 wks ± RBV GT 1b, no cirrhosis 12 wks 12 wks 12 wks GT 1b, cirrhosis 12 wks 12 wks + RBV 24 wks GT 1 P/R failure, no cirrhosis 12 wks

    12 wks + RBV (1a) 12 wks (1b) 12 wks ± RBV

    GT 1 P/R failure, cirrhosis 24 wks or 12 wks + RBV 24 wks + RBV (1a) 12 wks + RBV (1b) 24 wks ± RBV

    GT 1 SOF failure, cirrhosis 24 wks ± RBV Not recommended Not recommended

    GT 1 PI failure, no cirrhosis 12 wks Not recommended Not recommended

    GT 1 PI failure, cirrhosis 24 wks or 12 wks + RBV Not recommended Not recommended

    AASLD/IDSA/IAS–USA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C.

  • GT3 recommendations (EASL 2015)

    24 sem GT-3

    SOF + RBV

    -

    SOF + LDV

    -

    OBV/ PTV/r +

    DSV

    OBV/ PTV/r

    -

    SOF + SMV

    DCV + SOF

    - 12 weeks

    Non-cirrhotic patients* (mono & coinfected)

    Compensated cirrhosis* (mono & coinfected)

    - GT-3

    SOF + RBV

    -

    SOF + LDV

    -

    OBV/ PTV/r +

    DSV

    OBV/ PTV/r

    -

    SOF + SMV

    DCV + SOF

    - 24 weeks + RBV

    EASL guidelines 2015, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.025. Access: May 2015. *naïve & non-responders to PegIFN+RBV

    12 + RBV?

  • Toxicity associated with RBV

    Patients, n (%)

    LDV/SOF 12 and 24 Wk

    n=251

    LDV/SOF + RBV 12 and 24 Wk

    n=262 Total

    N=513

    AEs 190 (76) 225 (86) 415 (81)

    Treatment-related AE 118 (47) 196 (75) 314 (61)

    Grade ≥3 AE 19 (8) 20 (8) 39 (8)

    Serious AE 15 (6) 9 (3) 24 (5)

    Treatment-related serious AE 1 (

  • Natural history of HCV cirrhosis: SVR rates with IFN-free regimes

    Modified from Friedman SL. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1655–69

    HCS: hyperdynamic circulatory status; HE: hepatic encephalopathy; HRS: hepatorrenal syndrome; HVPG: hepatic venous gradient; RA: refractory ascites; SBP: spontaenous bacterial peritonitis;

    Major Descompensation Recurrent variceal bleeding, HRS, SBP

    Insoluble scar

    Clinical

    Symptoms

    Histology

    F1–F3 F4 (Cirrosis)

    HVPG

    Biology

    Hemodynamic

    HCS

    Functional

    No cirrhosis

    None

    Compensated

    None (no varices)

    Scar & cross linking

    Compensated

    No (varices present)

    Thick scars & nodules

    Decompensated

    Ascites, variceal bleeding, EH

    Insoluble scar

    Increasing fibrogenesis

    ≥10 ≥12 >20

    Increasing vasodilatation

    Worsening liver function

    >6

    Fibrogenesis and neovascularization

    100% 95% 90% 80-85%

    Any antiviral combination (GT, local availability))

    PK (renal &liver impairment), DDI

    Approved regimens for cirrhotic patientsSlide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20SOF/LDV ± RBV 12-24 weeksSOF/LDV ± RBV 12-24 weeksSlide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25ALLY-3: DCV+SOF 12 weeks�SVR12ALLY-3+: SOF+DCV+RBV 12 vs 16 wks�SVR12: Patients with CirrhosisDCV+SOF±RBV in GT-3�SVR4 in advanced fibrosis/cirrhosisGenotype 1 TreatmentGT3 recommendations (EASL 2015)�Toxicity associated with RBVSlide Number 32Slide Number 33