35
1 OPINION POLL

Apresentação do PowerPoint · A disponibilidade de peixes nos rios da região Melhorou Piorou Está igual Não sabe dizer % 20 T The quality of life in your municipality The quality

  • Upload
    lenhan

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

OPINION POLL

3

To measure the population’s knowledge regarding the Pantanal, WWF contracted a national and

a regional poll with the Ibope polling organisation to provide supporting information for the

NGO’s initiatives and those of its partners.

In June 2013, IBOPE conducted 2002 one-to-one interviews all over Brazil to investigate how

much Brazilians know about the Pantanal.

In September, 504 interviews were conducted with people living in municipalities in the Upper

Paraguay river region.

The presentation that follows is a synthesis of the main results obtained.

Objective, methodology and sample

5

Sample Profile

48 52

Masculino FemininoFemale

Sex Age group Schooling

Class Family Income (Official Minimum Salaries)

19

23

20

17

21

16 a 24

25 a 34

35 a 44

45 a 54

55 e mais

Female Female Female 16 to 24

25 to 34

35 to 44

45 to 54

55 and over

28

21

35

15

Até 4ª Série do

Fund.

5ª a 8ª Série

do Fund.

Ens. Médio

Superior

9

36

31

12

12

Mais de 5

Mais de 2 a 5

Mais de 1 a 2

Até 1

Não Respondeu

A/B

D/E

C

24%

59%

17%

Base: National Sample (2,002)

%

Male

Years 1 to 4 (Primary)

Years 5 to 8 (Lower 2ndary)

Higher Secondary

Higher Education

Over 5

Over 2 up to 5

Over 1 up to 2

1 or less

No answer

6

Sample Profile

Base: National Sample (2,002)

Size of the Municipality (nº of inhabitants)

Municipal Category Region

15

25

44

15

Norte/ Centro-Oeste

Nordeste

Sudeste

Sul

27

23

50

Capital

Periferia

Interior

50 50

RM

Demais Cidades

Metropolitan Region

12

31

57

Até 20 Mil

Mais de 20 a 100 Mil

Mais de 100 Mil

%

North/Centre-west

Northeast

Southeast

South

Up to 20 thousand

Over 20 up to 100 thousand

Over 100 thousand

MR

Other Cities

Periphery

7

Sample Profile

51

49

Masculino Feminino

Sex Age group

Schooling Family Income (MS)

22

22

20

16

21

16 a 24

25 a 34

35 a 44

45 a 54

55 e mais

35

17

34

14

Até 4ª Série do Fund.

5ª a 8ª Série do Fund.

Ens. Médio

Superior

7

20

29

13

31

Mais de 5

Mais de 2 a 5

Mais de 1 a 2

Até 1

Não Respondeu

Base: Regional Sample (504)

%

Years 1 to 4 (Primary)

Years 5 to 8 (Lower 2ndary)

Higher Secondary

Higher Education

Over 5

Over 2 up to 5

Over 1 up to 2

1 or less

No answer

16 to 24

25 to 34

35 to 44

45 to 54

55 and over

9

Conditions in the municipality: improvement in the quality of life perceived by more than half but harm to the environment as well

Qu. 02) Now I would like you to evaluate some aspects of your municipality. For each item that I read out I would like you to say whether it has improved, got worse or remained the same as it was 5 years ago. Let us begin with: (RU )

Base: Regional Sample (504)

55

39

16

14

11

9

15

51

51

63

35

43

28

30

20

1

2

4

5

6

A sua qualidade de vida aqui nacidade

A qualidade da água que chega atéa sua casa

A condição do meio ambiente local

A condição dos rios, nascentes ecórregos da região

A disponibilidade de peixes nos riosda região

Melhorou Piorou Está igual Não sabe dizer

%

20 20 20

T The quality of life in your municipality

The quality of the water supplied to your home

The conditions of the local environment

The conditions of the rivers and springs in the region

The availability of fish in the region’s rivers

imoroved worsened The same No answer

10

Visiting the Pantanal: most have never been there

Qu. 06) And how often do you visit the Pantanal, on average? (Single Answer)

Base: Regional Sample (504)

Pelo menos 1 vez por semana

2% Pelo menos 1 vez por mês

3%

Pelo menos 1 vez a cada

3 meses 4%

Pelo menos 1 vez a cada

6 meses 6% Pelo menos

1 vez por ano 8%

Menos frequentemente

13%

Visitou apenas uma vez

7%

Nunca visitou 57%

Não sabe dizer

1%

Never visited

At least once a week

At least once a month

At least once every 3 months

At least once every 6 momths

Visited just once

Less frequently

At least once a year No answer

11

Most people have never visited the Pantanal

Have you ever visited the Pantanal?

Have visited

Have never visited

Cannot remember

Base: Sample (2,002)

Qu. 2. Have you ever visited the Pantanal? (SINGLE ANSWER )

12

Northeast North

Centre- west

Southeast

South

Cannot say

Qu. 3. (Card with a Map) In which region of Brazil is the Pantanal located? (SINGLE ANSWER )

Although 90% have heard about the Pantanal, 2 out of 3 people cannot

identify the region where the Biome is located

13

High level of knowledge of the Pantanal: 93% of interviewees have heard of it

Which of these Brazilian natural landscapes do you know or have you heard of?

Qu. 1 Which of these Brazilian natural landscapes do you know or have you heard of? (STIMULATED – READ ITEMS IN TURN – SINGLE ANSWER PER ITEM)

Know Do not know

Atlantic Forest

Amazon

Pampas

Sample

14

And only half the population is familiar with the scenery that typifies the Pantanal landscape

It is a vast wetland area composed by highland Cerrado savannah plateaus and lowland floodplains

It is a tropical forest typified by dense jungle and huge trees

It is a dry region with little vegetation or green area

Cannot say

From what you have heard, which of the following phrases best describes the Pantanal scenery?

Sample

Qu. 4. (Card with options) From what you have heard, which of the following phrases best describes the Pantanal scenery? (READ OUT ITEMS 1 TO 3 TO THE INTERVIEWEE -SINGLE ANSWER PER ITEM)

16

As in the national poll, almost 40% of those interviewed did not know that the Pantanal is an area at risk of degradation

Qu.10)Q In your opinion, is the Pantanal an area at risk of degradation? (SPONTANEOUS)–SA)

61 21

18

Base: Amostra Nacional (2002) / Regional (504)

66

18

15

É uma área em risco

Não é uma área em risco

Não sabe dizer

It is an area at risk

It is not an area at risk

Cannot say

17

Even so, in stimulated responses, deforestation is the most mentioned threat to the Pantanal

Qu. 11) From what you have heard, what are the main threats to the Pantanal today? (STIMULATED - SINGLE ANSWER PER ITEM)

Base: Amostra Nacional (2002) / Regional (504)

66

27

21

32

18

27

16

12

4

1

9

73

53

50

36

34

30

23

17

9

1

5

Deforestation in the region

Degradation of the vegetation around springs and along the banks of rivers

Accumulations of silt and residues in the rivers making them shallower

Water pollution from raw sewage discharge

Increase in cities and urban populations in the region

Hunting

Unbridled Tourism

Construction of hydroelectric plants

Degradation of the Brazilian Cerrado savannahs

None of the above

Cannot say

%

18

Knowledge concerning the region’s rivers is diffuse

Qu. 12) Where do the rivers that cut across the Pantanal rise? (STIMULATED - MA)

Base: National (2002) / Regional (504) samples

In the Brazilian Cerrado savannahs

region

In the Pantanal floodplain

In Brazil’s neighbouring

countries – Bolivia Paraguay

Cannot say

20%

18%

32%

37% 37%

39%

36%

27%

National Regional

19

In regard to preservation, protecting the springs is the most mentioned measure among regional residents

Qu. 14) In your opinion, what are the most important measures for the preservation of the Pantnal? (STIMULATED –Multiple)

54

44

29

39

18

8

81

50

43

38

18

6

Preservação das suas nascentes

Políticas públicas de proteção do Pantanal, (ex. umalei específica de proteção)

Turismo ecológico

Criação de áreas protegidas (ex. parques e reservas)

Práticas agropecuárias sustentáveis (ex. redução deuso de agrotóxicos, combate a erosão do solo, etc.)

Não sabe dizer

Nacional

Regional

Base: Amostra Nacional (2002) / Regional (504)

%

Preservation of its springs

Public protection policies specifically for the

Pantanal (e.g. a specific protection law)

Ecological tourism

Creating protected areas (e.g. Parks and

Nature Reserves)

Sustainable agricultural and livestock production practices(e.g. reduction of pesticide

use, combating soil erosion, etc.)

Cannot say

20

Perceptions of responsibility for the protection of the headwaters are mixed

Qu. 17) In your opinion, who is responsible for protecting the springs and headwaters of the Pantanal? (Stimulated Response - Multiple options)

Base: Regional Sample (504)

46

46

37

18

9

8

6

Cada cidadão

O governo

De todos

Empresas de saneamento

Comitês de bacia

ONGs - Organizações nãogovernamentais

Não sabe opinar (Esp.)

%

Each citizen

The government

Everyone

Sanitation Companies

Basin Committees

Non-governmental Organisations

Cannot Say

21

The idea of the Pact is gaining force among regional inhabitants

Q8) Tendo em vista esse objetivo, como você avalia a importância de um “Pacto em defesa das cabeceiras do Pantanal”? Você diria que: (RU)

Base: Regional Sample (504)

“The Pact in Defence of the Pantanal Headwaters is designed to construct an alliance among all

sectors to guarantee water in sufficient quantity and of sufficient quality to permit the sustainable development of the region.”

64

29

Very important

Important

Indifferent

2

1

1

Not very important

Not important

No opinion 3%

93%

In regard to this objective, how important do you think the “Pact in Defence of the Pantana Headwaters” is? (Single Answer)

22

Few people know about the Mato Grosso State Policy on Water Resources

Qu. 20) Have you ever heard of the Mato Grosso State Policy on Water Resources? Qu. 21) Do you know of any action set out in the Mato Grosso State Water Resources Plan that has been implemented?

Base: Regional Sample (504) Base: Those answering yes (Regional) (63)

13 88 Sim

NãoNo

33 67 Sim

Não

Have you ever heard of the Mato Grosso

State Policy on Water Resources?

Do you know of any action that it has

carried out?

%

Yes Yes

No

23

Yes 18% No 82%

Or about the River Basin Committee

Qu. 22) Have you ever heard of the River Basin Committee?

Base: Regional Sample (504)

Have you ever heard of the River Basin Committee?

24

The population agrees that the best way to protect the Pantanal is by joining forces but regional residents consider that their responsibility is greater

Qu. 25. I have some statements here and I would like you to say to what extent you agree or disagree with them. The first statement is … (Single Answer for each line) Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

82

92

76

90

77

89

60

79

11

6

14

6

13

8

23

11

4

8

8

1

15

3

2

2

2

4

2

2

3

7

Nacional

Regional

Nacional

Regional

Nacional

Regional

Nacional

Regional

Concorda totalmente/ parcialmente

Não concorda nem discorda

Discorda totalmente/ parcialmente

Não sabe dizerBase: National Sample (2,002) / Regional (504)

The best way of preserving the Pantanal is by uniting the efforts of government, corporations

and civil society

Preservation of the Pantanal is everyone’s responsibility but most of all the responsibility of

those that live in the region

Brazilian society as a whole is responsible for the preservation of the Pantanal

There are other environmental issues more important than

the Pantanal such as the preservation of the Amazon,

%

Continued.

It is interesting to note that while the regional population considers itself to bear greater responsibility for Pantanal preservation , at the same time it considers the Pantanal to be less important than other Biomes

Totally/partially agree Neither agree nor disagree Totally/partially disagree Cannot say

26

Final Remarks

The analysis of the national poll results shows that the environmental issue is much closer for the

population to the population.

It is also interesting to note that the population does not make a direct connection between

improved quality of life and the preservation of the environment: most of the regional population

declared that their quality of life had improved (reflecting the social improvements achieved by

Brazil as a whole) but the majority also recognised that over the period in question the environment

had been jeopardised especially the conditions of rivers and springs

27

Final Remarks

The national poll showed that 66% of the people did not know which region the Pantanal is located

in and even when the answers were stimulated only half the population was able to describe the

Pantanal landscape.

Another interesting aspect is that the inhabitants of the Upper Paraguay river basin region do not

recognise it as being part of the Pantanal and that could give rise to problems in the aspect of taking

responsibility for its preservation.

Even so, in a similar way to the national population, regional inhabitants are capable of relating the

contributions of the landscape to the environment and to the life of communities.

28

Final Remarks

As expected, the local population’s knowledge of the Pantanal was greater even though most of them

had never visited it.

In the National poll, it was found that in spite of the lack of in-depth knowledge, when stimulated,

people are capable of identifying threats to the Pantanal and ways in which it can be preserved. It can

be seen, however, that such identifications are restricted to more general environmental aspects such

as deforestation and the question of the waters.

In the regional questions we detected a more coherent and forceful knowledge related to water

resource issues.

The threat that appears most forcefully is the question of deforestation and cross-referencing that with

the possible solutions we found that it was an issue strongly correlated to the preservation of the

headwaters.

29

Final Remarks

On the question of willingness to support Pantanal preservation activities, over 86% of the population

declared itself to be sympathetic to the cause. The most popular form of collaboration was that of

disseminating and publicising information.

It must be stressed that the effective degree of willingness to provide support is always less than that

declared in this kind of poll. Nevertheless, the sympathy expressed with the idea of diffusing

information could open up opportunities for making good use of the social media to publicise the

cause.

30

Final Remarks

In regard to responsibility for landscape preservation, it is interesting to note that the majority of the

population believes that the best form of preservation can be achieved through the joint efforts of

government, corporations and society at large. Those results are in keeping with those obtained by

the national poll. Some points, however, catch our attention:

The regional population shows a high level of agreement with the statement that inhabitants of the

Pantanal region itself have greater responsibility for this issue. At the same time, however, it

considers that there are other more important environmental issues in Brazil such as the Amazon.

31

Final Remarks

Those points indicate that there is a possible problem of sub-estimation of the Biome’s importance.

Even so, the validation of the national and regional poll data shows that the principle of a Pact for

the Defence of the Pantanal Headwaters is firmly adhered to by the local population, insofar as the

need to preserve the headwaters is a strong issue in the region.

We would therefore like to point out some of the lessons learned from the poll that could be useful

to the campaign.

Willingness and sensitivity to the issue are not lacking.

32

Final Remarks

There is still room for more information

Although the Pantanal is by no means unknown to the population, there is still a need for more specific information on the region, its importance and the threats it faces. Knowledge is fundamental. The more widely the cause is made known, the greater support there will be for it and recognition of the need for preservation. When most of the population considers that there are other more important environmental issues in Brazil such as the Amazon, for example, then it is expressing its greater familiarity with those other causes and indicating that the Pantanal is lagging behind other environmental issues in the country in the aspect of the population’s information and awareness regarding it. In regard to the local populations, there still room for further awareness raising in regard to the biome’s importance given that local residents seem to underestimate it.

33

Final Remarks

There is support for preservation

The population has already been made aware of the relevance of environmental causes and it is in favour of preservation and willing to support actions to that end. In that regard, there is an outstanding need to reduce the distance separating theory from practice by presenting clear simple ways in which people can effectively help the causes. Advantage must be taken of the population’s sense of responsibility; spurring it to action by means of the social media and other online instruments could be a good alternative. That sense of responsibility is even higher among members of the local population: 90% agree that the greatest responsibility lies with the regional population. The problem is that they do not recognise themselves as belonging to the Pantanal region.. It is necessary to enable people to perceive that they are part of the Pantanal and important agents of its preservation.

34

Final Remarks

Joining forces is the key idea

The population is convinced that joining forces is the best way to address the preservation of the

Pantanal.

That being so, the communication effort associated to the Headwaters Pact should focus on that aspect

as the way of translating the principles underlying the Pact to the population as a whole.

Putting aside technicism and working with the idea of union and joint efforts could be an important tool

for activating civil society and achieving a greater and more effective impact on corporations and

governments.

35

Technical Specifications

Field work dates

June 13 to 16, 2013

Sampling method The sampling model employed is one of conglomerates in thre stages modelo de amostragem utilizado é o de conglomerados em 3 estágios.

No primeiro estágio os municípios são selecionados probabilisticamente através do método PPT (Probabilidade Proporcional ao Tamanho), com base na população de 16 anos ou mais de cada município.

No segundo estágio são selecionados os conglomerados: setores censitários, com PPT (Probabilidade Proporcional ao Tamanho) sistemático. A medida de tamanho é a população de 16 anos ou mais residente nos setores.

Finalmente, no terceiro estágio é selecionado em cada conglomerado um número fixo de eleitores segundo cotas de variáveis descritas abaixo.

Margin of error

2,2 pontos percentuais , com intervalo de confiança de 95%.

% of data verified •Pelo menos 20% do material dos entrevistadores foi criticado e verificado.

•100% dos questionários foram submetidos a um teste eletrônico de consistência para verificação de coerência das respostas.

Copies of data gathering instruments

Questionários foram enviados para aprovação por parte do cliente antes do início dos trabalhos de campo e fazem parte do relatório/apresentação de pesquisa.

From June 13 to 16, 2013 A 3-stage cluster sampling technique was used. In the first stage the municipalities are selected using the Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) method based on the population figures for each municipality for the age group 16 plus. In the second stage the clusters are selected: census sectors using systematic PPS. Size is measured by the 16 and over age group Residing in the respective sectors. Finally in the third stage a fixed number of registered voters is selected from each cluster according to the variable values set out below 2.2 percentage points with a confidence interval of 95%. •At least 20% of the material gathered by interviewers was criticised and verified. •100% of the questionnaires were submitted to an electronic consistency test to verify coherence in the responses. Questionnaires were submitted to the client for approval before field work began and they are part of the poll report/presentation.