22
April 18, 2006

April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

April 18, 2006

Page 2: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

2

CACA34%34%

AZAZ3%3% NMNM

2%2%

TXTX20%20%

COCO2%2%

ILIL4%4%

FLFL7%7%

NYNY9%9%

NJ3%

BCBC

SonSonChiChi

CoaCoa

NLNL

TamTam

High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Populationand Mexico Population

25%Hispanic

25%Hispanic

35%Hispanic

35%Hispanic

43%Hispanic

43%Hispanic

Call-out boxes represent percent of state population that is Hispanicand percent of Mexican population that lives in border states

17% Mexico Population

17% Mexico Population

Hispanics/Latinos are largest minority group, 37.4 million (13.3% of total population)

Two-thirds are of Mexican origin

High levels of immigration; 53% of all immigrants are Hispanic

Projected to reach 102.6MM in 2050 (24% of total population)

6 Mexican border states = 17% of Mexico population

Growth in Mexican borderregion (2.3%) exceeds country growth (1.8%)

59% of U.S. Hispanics Live in Border States and 17% of Mexico Population Lives in 6 Border States

35%Hispanic

35%Hispanic Growing PopulationGrowing PopulationGrowing PopulationGrowing Population

Page 3: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

3

Border PopulationBorder PopulationBorder PopulationBorder Population

Grave Health Disparitiesin U.S. - Mexico Border Region

Highest Rates and Numbers of Hispanic Deaths Are Along U.S. - Mexico Border – Heart-related Diseases, Diabetes, Cancer, Stroke

Source: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center of Health Statistics

16% rate diabetes on border vs. 14.9% in Mexico and 13.9% in U.S.

13.9% of border population ispre-diabetic

74% of men and 70% of women

are overweight or obese

Severe shortage of physicians

Page 4: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

4

Pfizer’s “Sharing the Care” Program for Community Health Centers

Page 5: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

5

Providing Access in the US

ArizonaArizonaArizonaArizona

CaliforniaCaliforniaCaliforniaCalifornia

New MexicoNew MexicoNew MexicoNew Mexico

TexasTexasTexasTexas

More than 2 million uninsured people across the U.S. received free or low cost Pfizer medicines in

2005

$8.4 million in medicines 104,673 prescriptions 20,200 patients in 2005

$13.8 million in medicines 158,225 prescriptions 30,500 patients in 2005

$55.2 million in medicines 615,432 prescriptions 121,300 patients in 2005

$159.4 million in medicines 1,820,667 prescriptions 311,700 patients in 2005

Page 6: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

6

Sana La Rana – Reaching Communities

AdvertisingAdvertising Patient EducationPatient Education

Web-SiteWeb-Site

Public Service AnnouncementsPublic Service Announcements

Page 7: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

7

Vida Sana – Health Care Provider Resources

Information for Physicianson Diseases Affecting

Hispanic Patients

Tools for Nursesand Lay Advisors

Page 8: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

8

Alliance for a Healthy Border: A Public/Private Partnership

Reduce modifiable risk factors associated with diabetes and cardiovascular disease along the U.S. – Mexico border in 10 U.S. and 6 Mexican cities

Establish and/or expand existing cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention program targeting the Hispanic and Latino population along the border

Promote best practices in the prevention of these diseases U.S.: Create partnerships with federally qualified community

health centers in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas Mexico: Partner with USMBHC & community foundations to

implement awareness programs and with state secretaries of health to conduct screenings in clinics.

Goals of Alliance for a Healthy BorderGoals of Alliance for a Healthy BorderGoals of Alliance for a Healthy BorderGoals of Alliance for a Healthy Border

Page 9: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

9

Pfizer’s Role: Program Funding

Modeled After Successful ProgramsModeled After Successful ProgramsModeled After Successful ProgramsModeled After Successful Programs

Nutrition and Physical EducationNutrition and Physical EducationNutrition and Physical EducationNutrition and Physical Education

Family and Community InvolvementFamily and Community InvolvementFamily and Community InvolvementFamily and Community Involvement

Salud Para Su Corazon Pasos Adelante Project Dulce Su Corazon Su Vida

Walking clubs Cooking classes Nutrition classes

Home visits Community fairs Creation of community walking paths

Screenings Lead to Participation in Prevention ProgramsScreenings Lead to Participation in Prevention ProgramsScreenings Lead to Participation in Prevention ProgramsScreenings Lead to Participation in Prevention Programs

Additional promotoras serving the community Increased number of at-risk individuals screened

Page 10: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

10

Pfizer’s Role: Strengthen Health Provider Community

Enable health centers to enhance or establish prevention programs

Convene grantees to share best practices and lessons learned with each other

Evaluators to measure the effectiveness to advance knowledge and best practice in the field of cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevention

Offer Technical Assistance to:

Build stronger, more cohesive internal and external networks among partners

Page 11: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

11

U.S.: Selected Cities

ArizonaArizonaArizonaArizona

Tucson – El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center, Inc.

Nogales – Mariposa Community Health Center

CaliforniaCaliforniaCaliforniaCalifornia

Calexico – Clinicas de Salud del Pueblo, Inc.

San Diego – La Maestra Family Clinic San Diego – Family Health Centers

of San Diego – Logan Heights San Diego – San Ysidro

Health Center

New MexicoNew MexicoNew MexicoNew Mexico

TexasTexasTexasTexas

Laredo – Gateway Community Health Center, Inc.

El Paso – Centro de Salud Familiar La Fe, Inc.

Eagle Pass – United Medical Centers, Inc.

Pharr – Nuestra Clinica del Valle

Las Cruces/Sunland Park –La Clinica de Familia, Inc.

Columbus – Ben ArcherHealth Center

Page 12: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

12

Alliance for a Healthy Border Partners

Community Health Centers

Federal and Local Governments in the U.S.

U.S. – Mexico Border Health Commission

University of Texas Pan-American

Page 13: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

13

La Alianza en México

OBJETIVOS: Los mismos que en EEUU

PRESUPUESTO 2006: USD $300,000

SOCIOS:

Comisión de Salud Fronteriza

Gobiernos Estatales

Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil

Instituciones Académicas y Organismos Internacionales

CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN:

Prevalencia

Impacto social

Infraestructura pública y social

Pluralidad ´partidista

Page 14: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

14

¿Por qué la frontera?

POBLACIÓNDIABETES

TIPO IICASOS HC

CASOS HTA

PERSONAS CONSCIENTES

DE HTA

EN TRATAMIENTO

DE HTA

POBLACIÓN CONTROLADA

Baja California

2,487,367 273,610 1,069,568 746,210 373,105 186,553 37,311

Sonora 2,216,969 243,867 953,297 665,091 332,545 166,273 33,255Chihuahua 3,052,907 335,820 1,312,750 915,872 457,936 228,968 45,794Coahuila 2,290,070 251,908 984,730 687,021 343,511 171,755 34,351

Nuevo León 3,834,141 421,756 1,648,681 1,150,242 575,121 287,561 57,512Tamaulipas 2,753,222 302,854 1,183,885 825,967 412,983 206,492 41,298

Total 16,634,676 1,829,814 7,152,911 4,990,403 2,495,201 1,247,601 249,520

Porque al igual que en el resto del país, es importante transitar de una cultura de atención a una de prevención

Porque el constante flujo migratorio inhibe la adopción de hábitos saludables

Porque creemos que aquí encontramos a los socios adecuados

Porque las cifras son preocupantes:

Page 15: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

15

Fuente: Secretaría de Salud. Datos de mortalidad en estados fronterizos

¿Por qué enfermedades cardiovasculares?

CARDIOCARDIOCARDIOCARDIO

Poca o nula prevención en enfermedades de relativo fácil control

Todos los estados presentan´promedios muy superiores a la media nacional para ambos géneros

B.CChih.

Coah.N. L.

Son.Tamps

Homb.

69.3

78.4

69.7 74.1

92.9

63.3

40.3

61.0

47.450.8

62.4

43.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Muertes vinculadas a eventos cardiovasculares

Promedio Nacional50.7

National Average39,

Muj.

Page 16: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

16

Fuente: Secretaría de Salud. Datos de mortalidad en estados fronterizos

¿Por qué diabetes?

B.C Chih.Coah.

N. L.Son.

Tamps

Hom.

Muj.

49.5

64.1

76.5

55.762.3 61.5

46.250.1

60.0

45.7 47.7 52.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Muertes vinculadas a Diabetes Melitus

Promedio Nacional60.17

Promedio Nacional50.78

DIABETESDIABETESDIABETESDIABETES

Crecimiento exponencial durante las últimas décadas

Gastos estatales y particulares asociados al tratamiento igualmente exponenciales

En la frontera, cuatro estados presentan promedios superiores a los nacionales para hombres y dos para mujeres

Page 17: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

17

Ciudades seleccionadas y posibles OSC´s

Baja CaliforniaBaja CaliforniaBaja CaliforniaBaja California

Tijuana Fundación Internacional de la Comunidad Medicina Social Comunitaria Centro Comunitario de Salud UIA Fronteras Unidas Pro Salud Centro de Promoción de Salud Esperanza

ChihuahuaChihuahuaChihuahuaChihuahua

Ciudad Juárez IMIFAP Coalición de la Cuenca del Río Bravo UPN Compañeros A.C. UACH

SonoraSonoraSonoraSonora

Nogales Fundación del Empresariado Sonorense Asociación nacional de Diabetes Nogales Club Rotario Nogales Club Kiwanis Amigo

TamaulipasTamaulipasTamaulipasTamaulipas

Matamoros Fundación Comunitaria de Matamoros Club de Rotarios Villa de Nuevo Laredo Club de Leones Nuevo Laredo Cáritas Nuevo Laredo Fundación Corazón abierto

CoahuilaCoahuilaCoahuilaCoahuila

Piedras Negras IMIFAP Patronato de Personas con Discapacidad Asilo de Ancianos San Vicente de Paul Sociedad Mexicana de Diabetes Coahuila Casa del Peregrino

Nuevo LeónNuevo LeónNuevo LeónNuevo León

Anahuac IMIFAP UANL

Page 18: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

18

¿Quién seleccionará y evaluará?

CSFMEU

Secretarías de Salud estatales

OPS

Pfizer

COLEF

¿IMIFAP?

Nota: IMIFAP podría jugar un papel fundamental en el seguimiento del programa, siempre y cuando no implemente proyectos estatales

MÉTRICAS

• Disminución real de factores de riesgo

• Incremento en el porcentaje de pacientes tratados

• Disminuir el número de muertes asociadas a estos padecimientos

Page 19: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

19

¿Dónde estamos?

Aprobación Corporativa

Adjudicación presupuestal

Selección de ciudades

Identifiación de posibles OSC´s

Firma de convenio con CSFMEU, sección México

Definición de términos de referencia

Seis proyectos presentados

Presentación ante USMBHC

Page 20: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

20

Beneficios

Proyecto alineado con los objetivos de ambas instancias (corto plazo)

Atracción de recursos privados a problemas públicos (corto plazo)

Posibilidad de ampliar la alianza en un futuro tanto en padecimientos como en socios (mediano plazo)

Generación de bases de datos que permiten una mejor toma de decisones (mediano plazo)

Reducción en el gasto estatal por atención a estos padecimientos (largo plazo)

Fortalecimiento de nuestra incipiente red social (largo plazo)

Page 21: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

21

¿Qué necesitamos de ustedes?

1. Manifestar el apoyo formal al proyecto

2. Ayudar a la difusión informal del programa

3. Participar en sus diferentes fases

4. Desiganar un funcionario estatal que sirva de enlace con Pfizer

5. Enriquecer el programa con su experiencia

6. Identificar a posibles OSC´s participantes

7. Identificar una o dos clínicas locales que funjan como sedes

8. Apoyar con análisis clínicos gratuitos de glucosa, colesterol y presión arterial en dichas clínicas

Page 22: April 18, 2006. 2 CA 34% AZ 3% NM 2% TX 20% CO 2% IL 4% FL 7% NY 9% NJ 3% BC Son Chi Coa NL Tam High Concentration of U.S. Hispanic Population and Mexico

22

Siguientes pasos

Envío de términos de referencia a OSC´s (Abril)

Anuncio Formal (Mayo)

Selección de proyectos (Junio)

Actividades locales de lanzamiento – una por estado (Julio)

Presentación en conferencias y eventos varios Semana Binacional de Salud (Octubre) Instituto Legislativo Hispano Caucus (October)

Evaluacíón del programa (Enero ´07)