16
April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1

High Current RF-testing

ing. R.O. de MeijerAR Benelux BV

Page 2: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Customer’s target

• Testing of RF-current breakdown levels for currents > 50A rms

• Improvement of quality and reliability of the product.

• Not all the customer’s suppliers specify these breakdowns.

• Perform the testing in-house, as part of the design cycle and QA program

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 2

Page 3: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Customer’s target (cntd)

• Various components:

– Connects– Capacitors– PIN diode switches

• Preferably making use of the customer’s amplifiers– Pulse with 30 kW peak power @ 3% duty– 63 and 127 MHz

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 3

Page 4: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Problem definition

• RF amplifiers have 50Ω output impedance

• Because 50Ω is not low, the maximum deliverable current will not be high

• In case of Pout = 30 kWatt into 50 Ohm

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 4

AIrms 5.2450

30000

Page 5: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Enlarging the current

• With a constant power level the only option is lowring the impedance in the test cicrcuit.

• Transformation from 50Ω to 5Ω

• The implication for the current now flowing through 5Ω is

• This complies to the customer’s spcification

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 5

AIrms 775

30000

Page 6: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Impedance transformation

• With 30kW pulse and 3% duty cycle Pavg ~ 1kW

• Low-loss transformation is a must.

• Loss less transformation with a ¼λ coaxial transformer

• Two operational frequencies– 63 MHz λ = 4m75– 127 MHz λ = 2m36

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 6

50Ω 5ΩZtr30kW

LOAD

L= λ/4

Page 7: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

¼ λ coaxial transformer

• Coaxial cables with this characteristic impedance is not easily available

• The impedance of a coaxial line

• D = diameter outer conducter • d = diameter inner conducter

• εr = rel. dielectrical constant

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 7

d

D

r10log

138

81.15550xZtr

Page 8: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Creation of the ¼λ coaxial transformer

• Brass pipes with 17 and 13 mm diameter

• Make up a Z0 of 16Ω

• Two models, 63 MHz and 127 MHz

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 8

127 MHz63 MHz

Page 9: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

The transformed impedance on the Smith-Chart

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 9

5Ω 50Ω

Page 10: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Test set-up

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 10

50Ω 5Ω15.8ΩEUT BOX

5Ω1 kW

L

Page 11: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

1 kWatt 5Ω load

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 11

The 5Ω point

20 x 100Ω parallel

Page 12: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Unwanted effetcs in the set-up

• Electrical lengths inside the EUT box• Zload = R + jωL

• The ¼ λ transformator will not supply 50Ω to the amplifier.

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 12

Page 13: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Solution (theoretical)

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 13

Page 14: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

The solution (practical)

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 14

2 x 50Ω stub-tuner

Stub-tuner detail

Page 15: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

Conclusion

• All transmission lines have air-dielectricum, with de εr = 1

• No dielectrical losses.

• With the ¼ golf transmission line and the supporting stub tuners all paracitic effects in the EUT box are eliminated.

• The amplifier ‘sees’ under all conditions 50 Ω

• Full power available for the ‘destructive’ test

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 15

Page 16: April 2012HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 1 High Current RF-testing ing. R.O. de Meijer AR Benelux BV

April 2012 HF Technology, Eindhoven, April 2012 16

AR Benelux B.V.Frankrijklaan 72391 PX HAZERSWOUDE-DORP

Telefoon : +31 (0)172 423000Web-site : www.arbenelux.com

E-mail : [email protected]

More information