12
AUSTRALASIAN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY. I7. I999 The Potential for the Archaeological Study of Clay Tobacco Pipes from Australian Sites DENIS GOJAK and IAIN STUART This paper proposes that clay pipes are an'ideal'artefact because ofa range ofcharacteristics including cheapness, easeof discard, being marked and dated, and stylisticdffiiences tiat may reflect socio-economic dffirentiation. It reviews the his.toricaldevelopment of clay pipes ii-Australia and thi eaity local manufacture of pipes. It discusses the Australian tobacco hobits and exa^irns issues of trade, marketig and consumptrcn and how that affectedpeople's acquisition and disposal ofpipes. This section includes i discussion on the 'Squatters Budgeree' pipe which was made in Great Briiain for the Australian market. It examines the usefulness of clay pipe remains in dating Australian archaeological sites. 'If archaeologists hadto describe an idealartefact with which to understand the past it would needto have the followins characteristics: a) be cheapand readily available, something commonly used in dailylife; b) be easily breakable to encourage discard; c) whenbroken be likely to enter the archaeological record with little likelihood of scavenging or recycling; d) be able to survive harsh depositional environments; e) have manufacturer's names or other marks for easv dating; f) exhibitpatterned variability in form through time; g) exhibit stylistic differences reflecting class, status, ethnicity andpoliticalaffiliation; h) be depicted frequently in contemporary pictorial material, to enable inferences about the social context of its use to be made. Is theresuchan artefact? The clay tobacco pipe certainly fulfils all ofthe above criteria yet, surprisingly, few published analyses of clay pipes are available from Australia and archaeologistshave not taken advantage of these characteristics to expand our knowledge ofthe past. This paper provides an overview ofthe claytobacco pipein thecontext of Australian historical archaeology. It is not intended to be a definitive study but to give some basic contextual information and outline directionsin which further research could be undertaken. The paucity of published clay pipe analysis, or even cataloguing to provide a basis for comparative research, reflects a moregeneral lack ofanalytical artefact studies from Australian sites. Oneofthe reasons there has been a reluctance among archaeologists to publish artefact studies hasbeen the absence of useful contextual frameworks which placetheir assemblages in a broader social and economic contextthat relates to Australian historical archaeology. The plethora of studies of North American artefact categories seldom engages issues thataredirectly relevant to Australian archaeology. Archaeological studiesof clay pipes in Australia have generally focused on descriptive typology and the identification of pipe manufacturers. Thefirst large assemblage published was from the convict barracks site at Port Arthur, Tasmania.r A comprehensive catalogue of the excavated clay pipes was produced, but the death of the excavator, Maureen Byrne, meant that a full reportof the excavation was never published.z Since then there have been a number of major sites excavated which have produced substantial numbers of clay pipes including the Hyde Park Barracks and Royal Mint, the First Government House site, Lilyvale and Cumberland/Gloucester Street, all in Sydney, and the Little Lonsdale Street site in Melbourne (Fig. l). These and other smaller collections produced by cultural resource management 38 excavations should be ableto provide a basis for undertaking further analysis of claypipes. Although there arean increasing number of archaeological clay pipe studies globallythereremains a strongelement of antiquarian interest in claypiperesearch. The mainperiodicals dealing with clay pipes, publishing material with a world-wide coverage, are the Society for Clay Pipe Research Nevtsletter (SCPR Neu,sletter) and Clay Tobacco pipe Studies (now defunct). With the British Archaeological Reports occasional series The Archaeology ofThe Clay Tobacco prpe, these three series contain important studies on assemblages, manufacturers andmarkets. Unfortunately, few of these are directly relevant to Australia as they mainly concentrate on English clay pipe industries priorto thenineteenth century, although information about themajor exporters to thecolonial markets is increasing. The survivingevidence provides an opportunity to study both the specifics of clay pipe production and use, and to understand the formation of assemblages. The fragilityof clay pipes and the resilience of their fragments once discarded makes them idealfor specialist analysis to reveal site history andformation processes. THE MANUFACTUREOF CLAY PIPES From the startof tobacco consumption in Europe in the late sixteenth century the most common form of usehasbeenby smoking with a pipe, the earliest recorded being c.1580.3 Tobacco could alsobe takenby chewing, in cigar form or as snuff. During the seventeenth century local manufacturing centres throughout Europe produced distinctive regional forms of pipe showing a wide range of decorative styles which continually evolved.a In 1788, when the colony of New South Waleswas founded, taking tobacco had become acceptable behaviour for all classes and was second only to alcohol as a social narcotic. Clay pipes used from 1788 onwards conformed to a basic shape - a hemispherical or egg-shaped bowl on top ofa tapering stem (Fig.2). Themouthpiece could either be moulded or left unformed. The base ofthebowlcould either berounded or have a spur,which was a non-functional vestige of a broader foot that had originallyallowed the pipe to be rested upright. The stem wasgenerally straight andbetween 75 and 150mm long, although longerand curvedstems were also produced. Clay pipesare produced from fine clayswhich generally fire to a cream or white colour,although red, brown and black pipes wereproduced as well. Ballclay of a variety of compositions wasused astheraw material, andneed not have been kaolin, as is sometimes stated.5 The temperature of firing did not vitriry the clay so it remained earthenware, with a porous body. Because the porosity ofthestem could peel skin from thelips of thesmoker, themouthpieces of pipes were oftenglazed, coated in sealing wax or simply soaked in beer.6 llt lf lil ! |Ii lfi ill u lt lfl .t0 m " lil !{ fr ,t ,it[ fli 6 f m il m il rfi rU ffi ru flll 1[ fit ,m IM ru l8ti MI

Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

AUSTRALASIAN HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY. I7. I999

The Potential for the Archaeological Study of Clay Tobacco Pipesfrom Australian SitesDENIS GOJAK and IAIN STUART

This paper proposes that clay pipes are an'ideal'artefact because ofa range ofcharacteristics includingcheapness, ease of discard, being marked and dated, and stylistic dffiiences tiat may reflect socio-economicdffirentiation. It reviews the his.torical development of clay pipes ii-Australia and thi eaity local manufactureof pipes. It discusses the Australian tobacco hobits and exa^irns issues of trade, marketig and consumptrcnand how that affected people's acquisition and disposal ofpipes. This section includes i discussion on the'Squatters Budgeree' pipe which was made in Great Briiain for the Australian market. It examines theusefulness of clay pipe remains in dating Australian archaeological sites.

'If archaeologists had to describe an ideal artefact with whichto understand the past it would need to have the followinscharacteristics:

a) be cheap and readily available, something commonlyused in daily l i fe;

b) be easily breakable to encourage discard;c) when broken be likely to enter the archaeological record

with little likelihood of scavenging or recycling;d) be able to survive harsh depositional environments;e) have manufacturer's names or other marks for easv

dating;

f) exhibit patterned variability in form through time;g) exhibit stylistic differences reflecting class, status,

ethnicity and political affi liation;h) be depicted frequently in contemporary pictorial

material, to enable inferences about the social context ofits use to be made.

Is there such an artefact? The clay tobacco pipe certainlyfulfils all ofthe above criteria yet, surprisingly, few publishedanalyses of clay pipes are available from Australia andarchaeologists have not taken advantage of thesecharacteristics to expand our knowledge ofthe past. This paperprovides an overview ofthe clay tobacco pipe in the context ofAustralian historical archaeology. It is not intended to be adefinitive study but to give some basic contextual informationand outline directions in which further research could beundertaken. The paucity of published clay pipe analysis, oreven cataloguing to provide a basis for comparative research,reflects a more general lack ofanalytical artefact studies fromAustralian sites. One ofthe reasons there has been a reluctanceamong archaeologists to publish artefact studies has been theabsence of useful contextual frameworks which place theirassemblages in a broader social and economic context thatrelates to Australian historical archaeology. The plethora ofstudies of North American artefact categories seldom engagesissues that are directly relevant to Australian archaeology.

Archaeological studies of clay pipes in Australia havegenerally focused on descriptive typology and theidentification of pipe manufacturers. The first large assemblagepublished was from the convict barracks site at Port Arthur,Tasmania.r A comprehensive catalogue of the excavated claypipes was produced, but the death of the excavator, MaureenByrne, meant that a full report of the excavation was neverpublished.z Since then there have been a number of major sitesexcavated which have produced substantial numbers of claypipes including the Hyde Park Barracks and Royal Mint, theFirst Government House site, Lilyvale andCumberland/Gloucester Street, all in Sydney, and the LittleLonsdale Street site in Melbourne (Fig. l). These and othersmaller collections produced by cultural resource management

38

excavations should be able to provide a basis for undertakingfurther analysis of clay pipes.

Although there are an increasing number of archaeologicalclay pipe studies globally there remains a strong element ofantiquarian interest in clay pipe research. The main periodicalsdealing with clay pipes, publishing material with a world-widecoverage, are the Society for Clay Pipe Research Nevtsletter(SCPR Neu,sletter) and Clay Tobacco pipe Studies (nowdefunct). With the British Archaeological Reports occasionalseries The Archaeology ofThe Clay Tobacco prpe, these threeseries contain important studies on assemblages, manufacturersand markets. Unfortunately, few of these are directly relevantto Australia as they mainly concentrate on English clay pipeindustries prior to the nineteenth century, although informationabout the major exporters to the colonial markets is increasing.

The surviving evidence provides an opportunity to studyboth the specifics of clay pipe production and use, and tounderstand the formation of assemblages. The fragility of claypipes and the resilience of their fragments once discardedmakes them ideal for specialist analysis to reveal site historyand formation processes.

THE MANUFACTURE OF CLAY PIPES

From the start of tobacco consumption in Europe in the latesixteenth century the most common form of use has been bysmoking with a pipe, the earliest recorded being c.1580.3Tobacco could also be taken by chewing, in cigar form or assnuff. During the seventeenth century local manufacturingcentres throughout Europe produced distinctive regional formsof pipe showing a wide range of decorative styles whichcontinually evolved.a In 1788, when the colony of New SouthWales was founded, taking tobacco had become acceptablebehaviour for all classes and was second only to alcohol as asocial narcotic.

Clay pipes used from 1788 onwards conformed to a basicshape - a hemispherical or egg-shaped bowl on top ofa taperingstem (Fig. 2). The mouthpiece could either be moulded or leftunformed. The base ofthe bowl could either be rounded or havea spur, which was a non-functional vestige of a broader footthat had originally allowed the pipe to be rested upright. Thestem was generally straight and between 75 and 150 mm long,although longer and curved stems were also produced. Claypipes are produced from fine clays which generally fire to acream or white colour, although red, brown and black pipeswere produced as well. Ballclay of a variety of compositionswas used as the raw material, and need not have been kaolin, asis sometimes stated.5 The temperature of firing did not vitrirythe clay so it remained earthenware, with a porous body.Because the porosity ofthe stem could peel skin from the l ips ofthe smoker, the mouthpieces of pipes were often glazed, coatedin sealing wax or simply soaked in beer.6

lltl

lfl

lil!

|Iil

lfi

illl

ult

lfl

.t0

m"xlil!{

fr,t

,it[

flil

6

f

mlilmilrfill

rUffi

rufllllll

1[

fit

,m

IM

rul8tilt

MIII

Page 2: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

s.A

&ing

*gical;rt of; ; -^ t^. t !d lJ

rr ide.e tternowionalthreeurers3\'ant

Y'Y -

.ai ionl ino

study:id toi clayardedlstory

. Erdc Perk Berrrcks 2. Royal Mlnt 3. First Government Hous€ 4. Lllyvele5. Cumberhnd/Gloucester St 6. Crdmrns Cottrge 7. Sellors'Home

' a '.!ap of Sydney CDB and relevant archaeological siles. (Dratvn by- . - . , .+e )

. :e technology of pipe making remained substantially

--:-:.rged from the seventeenth century onwards.'The pipe*.. ::.ade by rolling a sausage ofclay to the right length and':- :.-:.3ss. and inserting a wire into the stem. This was put into a- - -- :: Ihree-part iron mould which created the final shape of:-: :.:e. imparting any decoration or legend onto the stem or:,. ̂ .\fter it was removed from the mould the pipe was. .;:j up and any flash removed. Stamps for additional::: : -::1.1n or advertising were applied at this stage. The pipes, :-; :.:en arranged in a kiln and fired. Once cooled, the pipes" - : ]e packed in straw or wood shavings in boxes or crates' - --::.slort.

--3 process was carried out by hand and a skilled: :a-::i.er could produce pipes at a rate ofabout 500 per day.-- , ::uld be considerably increased by breaking down ther- : :3: i into separate tasks, or using steam-driven machines for

-- . -i :3ns of the process. Factories varied from a single' ::--:.er to the large Scottish export f irms which employed: :-: :.undred people. Pipe-making was a recognised craft

i' : : - :3 distinct from other ceramic trades, although some: .r:-. :l:'ms did make clay pipes.

. :"- J price agreement list reveals that the major Scottish1 :{::3:-: each had over 300 distinct varieties of pipes in their

-i j ; - i, is. and the firm of Will iam White had produced 606*.:,,- rarieties.8 These included many personality or effigyr:E: .rrih the head of a particular individual, such as

- :;-:::e. and the commemoration of a particular event or: : :;.. :ssue. e.g. 'Home Rule'. Other pipes were named after11,: :.: r r:r shorvn on the bowl, such as basketwork, a natural or'-;-:---s scene, ship, geometric or l inear pattern or the*:'.:-r: :esign of a novelty pipe. Pipes were also categorised- ::: : -:ize. stem shape, bowl type and overall form. Some of:-: -:,: rarieties were Irish, Cutty, TD, churchwarden and

-i-.r \;rrerous sub-varieties based on size and added:,j,. -::.:n rrere created, e.g.' large Dublin Cutty' and'small' { ' - - ,^ : : i \n Pr ince' (Fig. 3) .

'. ' . ;: lecoration was imparted by the mould, meaning that a-: , -: -.J had to be created for each variety (Fig. 4). Some: :tr--:.\3rs equipped their moulds with changeable inserts sor*..il -: ', rCual names or advertisements could be moulded onto

- : :. -:'rn request. Moulded decoration was either impressed- -: ;i: ',r hile stamped decoration, made after the unfired pipe

was released from the mould, was impressed. Stampeddecoration could produce finer detail but was often not evenlyimpressed into the clay. A third decorative technique wasrouletting, which produced dentated pattems around the bowlrim or stem. This was produced by a toothed wheel or specialknife, again after the pipe was released from the mould.Occasionally, paint would be used to pick out particularfeatures ofa design.

Printing could be added with inked stamps either before orafter firing for additional variation or to meet specific marketdemands. Brassey has published details of transfer-printeddecoration on over 50 clay pipes from the Victoria Hotel inAuckland New Zealand.n These pipes were manufactured byJ.G. Reynolds of London and seem to date to around 1862.Examples of this form of decoration are rare survivals inarchaeological contexts.

Manufacturers' names on pipes were generally placedalong the stem, either in full or as initials (Fig. 5). Thepipe-maker Thomas White, for example, is marked on pipes as'THO WHITE', 'T.W. ' , 'TW & Co' , 'WHITE & CO.' ,'WHITE'S' and 'THO. WHITE & Co' among othervariations.lo The place of manufacture was marked on theopposite side of the stem. In common with most manufacturedgoods the designation ofplace ofmanufacture was affected bythe U.S. McKinley Tari"ff Act of 1891, which required that allgoods imported into the United States had to be marked withtheir country of origin.r I Most Scottish and Englishpipe-makers had used their street address or town oforigin butthis was changed to either'England' or'Scotland' after 1891.Less common in the nineteenth century was the practise ofmarking the maker's initials onto the spur (Fig. 5d). By themid-nineteenth century the spur had decreased in size to a smallremnant or was entirely absent on many pipe forms.

The potential exists to identi! a maker's individualmoulds. At the Barrack Lane site in Parramatta, New SouthWales, about 50 pipe fragments were found which weremarked 'J. ELLIOTT MAKER / MARKET ST WHARF'.'2Joseph Elliott was a Sydney pipe-maker who operated betweenat least l83l and 1837.' ' Six individual moulds were used inthe assemblage. Generic clay pipe moulds appear to have beencut into with a graver, producing fine angular lettering, whichvaried considerably in style and spacing among the moulds. Allfragments were deposited close together, suggesting that pipesmade from the different moulds were in circulation together. Itshould be possible to determine how many moulds were in useat any one time, which would provide a good measure of thehealth ofthe colonial clay pipe trade, as well as a detailed studyof one pipe-maker's output over time. It could also be used torefine otherwise imprecise dating of a particular manufacturer'

Apart from clay, other pipe bowls were made frommeerschaum, a soft stone suitable for intricate carving, orcarved from wood species such as briar. These had stems andmouthpieces made from amber, cawed bone and, later in thenineteenth century, vulcanite and other plastics. A separateAmerican stub-stemmed pipe form, with a large clay bowl anddetachable reed stem, is almost unknown from Australiansites.la There is also considerable evidence ofChinese opiumsmoking equipment being used on the Australian and NewZealand goldfields, and later in the urban Chinatowns' Theparaphernalia of opium smoking is quite distinctive, but isunlikely.-to be found outside the mining and Chinatowncontext. ''

Clay pipes break easily and those with longer stems areespecially fragile. Estimates of how long a pipe survives innormal usage based on contemporary accounts range fromseveral days to two weeks.r6 Heavier and thicker pipes wereproduced which were popular with labourers, but even theseended up in fragments. If a stem broke near the mouthpiece thepipe could be used, perhaps with the stem being reshaped first

e late

;580. ' ,or as

:uringlorms* hichSouthpnble: lasa

: basic

-lerlng".r left. r have:r footr:. Ther long,:. Clay:etoa. plpess i r ions: i in, asr itrifobody.

: i ips of;oated

39

Page 3: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

Fig. 2: Clay pipe terminologt, showing the mainfeatures referred to inthe text.

(Fig. 6f). However, a cracked bowl, or a stem broken too closeto the bowl, was enough reason for a pipe to be discarded. Thereuse of pipes with broken stems, either by the original smokeror someone seeking to save money, may be expected to reflecteither poverty or difficulty in accessing reliable supplies ofnewpipes. No work has been done on the occurrence ofpipe reuseto test this proposition.

Although there are various uses recorded for clay pipefragments, such as gaming counters and whistles, it is unlikelythat scavenging of fragments would have removed more than avery small proportion ofthe pieces entering the archaeologicalrecord." Evidence of use is commonly found on pipefragments. Smoking tobacco leaves a black or dark brownresidue within the bowl after a single smoke. Fowler recordsthat Sydney pipe smokers treasured black, stained pipes andwould wrap them in leather or even buy them alreadyblackened.'" As teeth grip the stem near the mouthpiece theymay chip off small pressure flakes of glaze or ceramic on upperand lower surfaces. Names were sometimes scratched ontopipes, perhaps to indicate ownership but possibly afterbreakage in the same way that ostraca were used as counters.re

The ubiquity of smoking among both Europeans andAboriginal people following European contact is confirmed bydental evidence from skeletons, which sometimes show clearevidence of distinctive tooth wear attributed to clenching pipestems between the teeth.2o

TOBACCO HABITS AND CLAY PIPEF'ASIIIONS

In England taking tobacco was widespread through all socialclasses, but with considerable variation. The upper classespreferred snuffand cigars. Pipes were still popular, but the claypipe was scorned in favour of a carved meerschaum or briar.Cigarettes were introduced during the Napoleonic Wars, andwere always around thereafter. In Australia they did notpredominate over pipes until the late nineteenth century, whileclay pipes rapidly dwindled in popularity, with almost no use

40

after World War One. Chewing tobacco is recorded inAustralia but it never reached the same popularity as in NorthAmerica.2l Few, if any, clay pipe fragments are found in securetwentieth-century archaeological contexts.22

Tobacco was one of the first colonial industries.23 Themoderate climate, the ease of growing and th6 ready market allencouraged tobacco growing as a profitable second crop forfarmers in the early years of the settlement. It was neverconsidered to be as good as the imported stuff, which was alsousually twice the price. Clay pipes initially had to be importedto smoke it, but in l8l I D. D. Mann was able to observe that atleast one pipe-maker was operating locally and .the greatpropensity to smoking which prevails throughout the colony,causes an astonishing consumplion of this article, and has wellrepaid the original speculator."" Tobacco was also used as atreatment for scab in sheep and many pastoral properties grewtobacco for this purpose.

In discussing the broader context of tobacco use inAustralia in his book Under Fire Walker notes the associationbetween clay pipe smoking and low socio-economic status.26English social distinctions in tobacco use were transferred toAustralia where clay pipes were associated most withlabourers, convicts and especially the Irish. The Irish were thestereotypical labourers in nineteenth-century England, beingemployed as nawies in the construction of canals and railways.They also formed, as immigrants, a large proportion of thepopulation of Scottish cities such as Glasgow and Edinburgh,which became centres for the export trade in clay pipes. TheIrish were associated with a particular form of pipe -short-stemmed, thick and with a rouletted rim, robust enough tobe smoked while doing physical work. The .EmigrantMechanic' records such pipes in common use in New SouthWales.27

The whole company was divided into minor groups oftwos, threes, and fours, and the dudeen (a pipe withstem reduced to three, two, one or half an inch) was ineverybody's mouth. I think there was not an individualin the room, but one female. who did not smoke more orless, during the brief time we sat there.Dudeen was an Irish word used to refer to clay pipes

generally, but was already being used in the colonies to referparticularly to the thick pipes associated with lrish navvies inEngland (Fig. 7)." The range of pipes found in Ireland is largeand the navvy pipes are not characteristic of the assemblage,suggejting that they were adopted mainly among the emigrantIrish."

Echoing Mann later in the century is Fowler, who alsonoted with amusement that pipe smoking was ubiquitousamong Australians. 'Everybody has one, from the littlepinafored school-boy...to the old veteran who came out withthe second batch ofconvicts'.30

While accounts such as this make it clear that nearly alllower class men and women smoked, contemporaryillustrations generally do not show women smoking with claypipes unless it is the artist's intention to clearly indicate thatthese women were from the lowest class and probably devoidof civilisation or morals. Class distinctions in taking tobacco,and whether women were permitted to smoke (at least inpublic) can be traced in contemporary illustrations. Theassociation of the clay pipe with lower class or status isaffirmed throughout the nineteenth century. Portrayals oftobacco smoking among the middle class show it to have beenalmost as commonplace as the lower orders, at least among themen. There appears to have been no objection to tobacco per se,purely the manner in which it was ingested.

The role oftobacco as a cheap, socially sanctioned narcoticdeserves comment. Tobacco was a common ration item forconvicts and labourers in lieu of wages.'l As a habit-forming

Page 4: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

din,Iorthrcure

The.et allp forrever; alsoortedhat atgreatilony,; welllasagew

se iniaionfus.26ed towith

re thebeingways.rf theirgh,i. The

'ipe -ugh toigrantSouth

ofdl

intalor

prpesl referries in; largeblage,rigrant

o alsoluitous

littlen with

rly allporaryh clayrc thatdevoid,bacco,ast ini. Thertus is'als ofc beenng theFr se,

arcoticem fororming

uatAfrcfAntO /FOfl fttt htfsr Ctrrs.

: l;ge-fromaThomasDavidsonandCo.catalogueshowingatypicalrangeofdecoratedpipeforms(GallagherandPricel9ST:128).Thevarieties

f:R np to botlom) Squatter, Long Meerschaum, Large Douglas, Large Carved Milo, Large Garibaldi, Ileed, My Pipe, Short Congo, Gold Digger,i crJandGoat Head.

: g ! l;prcal clay pipe bowlsfound in nineteenth-cerrturyqal;:-i"l;r srtes lall examples in thefollowingfgures areFm --:;ii.rru Cottage Historic Site, Sydney. (Drawn by--c,:r!-c ?zmte )

Ao-

l "I

fl

twi-ffi1(2 \g W

Ot

-i----_--- n6

4l

Page 5: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

Fig. 6: Clay pipe mouthpieces. 6a and c havebeen sealed with red wax, 6b has yellow-brownglaze, 6f has been reshaped followingbreakage. (Drawn by Georgia Rennie.)

substance it also had a potential to serve as a way ofensuringcontinuing dependency in an economic relationship. In townsthere would be no problem in getting alternative supplies oftobacco and pipes, but in rural areas these would have to betransported and bought at substantial cost. The supplier oftobacco and pipes, such as a squatter or religious mission, couldhold a strong measure of control over their labourers orcharges, as they would have to rely upon the employercontinuing to satis! their habits, and as they were partly paid inrations had no cash to pay for an alternative supply.

Marginalised Aboriginal populations receiving tobacco intheir rations from a pastoral station, mission or governmentagency developed a dependency upon the supplier that was asmuch physiological as economic. Most descriptions ofAboriginal people living in camps on stations or near Europeansettlements note that both men and women smoked." Thishelped to reinforce the common nineteenth-century perceptionof the Aboriginal as brutish and uncivilised.

42

Fig. 5: Clay pipe stems, showing typical makers'marks and other stem markings. (Drawn byGeorgia Rennie.)

In the upper and middle classes smoking was associatedwith leisure and contemplation, as a contrast to the workingclass, where smoking was associated with work and raucousentertainment. The smoking rituals of the wealthy wereelaborate. The smoking room enhanced the exclusive malenature of smoking for leisure, and it was not considered politeto smoke in mixed company. Ladies did not smoke, althoughfrom the late nineteenth century smoking cigarettes becamepopular as a way of showingthat you were a modern woman,with just a hint of feminism." Ceremony was attached to theoffering of cigars aftei dinner to guests, and suitably engravedpipes, cigar snippers, ashtrays and cigar cases were among themost personal of presents. The most lavish of these smokingrequisites were made of gold and silver. Not surprisingly, thesedo not commonly enter the archaeological record.

While not gender-specific, tobacco and smoking reflectedcontemporary attitudes to both class and gender, and had a rolein reinforcing existing divisions within society. There was

rsclono lillq

Dcporri -l' a latcov I

t lt I to lLL

050ff-

m.

s+trfO

Iwb.o

I

-

I

d.o

Ir-l I - f

. .O

0F-I

e.o

gto

Io

Page 6: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

:.::rsiderable social variation in the way tobacco was used in:.;srralia. Clay pipes have a very clear association with loweri r{.trecottornic status. Particularly interesting is the possibility---.:: rhe habit-forming properties of tobacco were used to::.:.:crce pafferns ofeconomic dependence in rural areas.

TR{DE, MARKETING AND CONSUMPTION-.: inovement of clay pipes from their place of manufacture to---::: larket in the Australian colonies is a complex issue, for'.:::h only fragmentary statistics are available. Archaeological:. :3nce provides important supplementary information on;:-:s of trade, marketing and consumption and has the

:':::ecl of clarifiing and expanding the available data. As::i:. colony managed its own trade and imposed tariffs and:-r-,:es on goods being brought in for use in the colony, and on: -,:.:s uhich were brought in for the purpose of forwarding to a.-:sequent destination, the study of import and export can:F-: ::ne confusing. General trade figures usually do not: i-::entiate between exports which originated in the colony or:- - .: "r h ich had arrived the previous week on another boat and": ;:: r iait ing on the wharf for transfer elsewhere.

"nprons to the Colonies

,. -:.: l clay pipe production was negligible compared to the: --:.3 urf imports. Some import figures are available and

-: .::. 3 trade that was eventually to be measured in tons. The-:, - :uaplier of pipes to Australia was Great Britain,:-: : , :::.antlv from Scotland. The Scottish industry developedr *:: ::rir vears of the nineteenth century, displacing the: :,:-: ; la1 - pipe trade from London, Bristol and:.. ----:;pton.'t The reliance upon pipes from Great Britainvi j i - : : i rhat D. D. Mann noted in l8 l l that ' tobacco-pipes,!: :-- :..31e vears ago, at the cheapest periods cost sixpence::.:-.. ::i nou manufactured in the settlement of a very good; *:. .,. nl are retailed for one penny each'."

: -: :. earliest years of the colony, to about 1850, most of:"s :€--.31 information about imports has to be inferred fromr-:-.: i-.:Eical remains. Examples of pipes made by French,.,,i.::-- :.:erican and German makers have been found at First. : :-::nI House, Lilyvale and Cadmans Cottage. However,'":.:::"-

- : : rhe time range covered and the possible introduction

- -,: ..:.:al pipes brought by ships'crew into the port, the

discovery of non-British pipes at places with maritimeassociations should be treated cautiously.'o

Imports were brought to Australia by ship in a variety ofcontainers. Trade records of the late nineteenth centurydescribe clay pipes in boxes, cases, packages and tons.37 Oneshipwreck in Australian waters^containing large numbers ofclay pipes has been excavated.'o The brig Tigress sank in theGulf of St Vincent in September 1848 (near the end of a voyagefrom Scotland). Among her cargo for Adelaide were 50 boxesof clay tobacco pipes. Although none of the boxes wererecovered intact, all of the identifiable pipes recoveredarchaeologically were produced by Thomas White and Co. ofEdinburgh. The majority of pipes found were of two particulardesigns - an Irish harp/thistle combination and a three-mastedship under sail/anchor and cable combination. Three furtherdesigns - two geometric and one stamped TW - were alsorecorded. but were less common.

The Tigress find suggests that in this instance pipes wereimported into Australia as cargoes from a particularmanufacturer, an important consideration in understanding thedistribution of particular clay pipe types. Pipes were not mixedfrom diflerent manufacturers prior to shipping to the colonies.It will be important to establish whether only a small proportionof each manufacturer's range was exported in quantity, or ifthefull range of hundreds of pipe types listed in the makers' listswould have been available in Australia.

The collapse ofcolonial production by the 1840s coincidedwith the rise of the Scottish exporters, who began producingpipes specifically for the Australian market. However, beforethey took over the trade there was a period in themid-nineteenth century when Dutch pipes appear to have beenimported in large quantities, and may have even dominated themarket."

Some indication of the volume of imports is available incolonial statistics. Maclehose says that in 1836 over onemillion pipes ('8172 gross') were imported.ao Later statisticsspeak in terms of cases or packages, but the number isestimated by Wilson and Kelly to be between 5 and25 millionper year.o' Victorian statistics indicate 2.9 million wereimported in 1878 and 4 mill ion in l88l.a2

The country of origin of clay pipe imports to New SouthWales and Victoria for three sample years (Tables 1,2) isdeceptive in that probably all of the pipes listed as imported

sociated.vorkingraucous:\ were'.e maled polite!thoughbecame\YOman,

rJ to the:ngravedrong thesmoking:ly. these

reflected:ad a role'lere was

F;F

50ff

mm

e,h-vdAS/ -

-,,-.-'. --i:..2 clay ptpes (dudeens) showing the characleristic roulelted rim and thick stem. (Dravn by Georgia Rennie.)

+)

Page 7: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

from the other British colonies were products of Great Britainbeing trans-shipped. Intercolonial import and export withinAustralia was only a small part of the total trade and much ofthis appears to have occurred along the rural borders, such asthe Riverinawhich, although in New South Wales, had strongereconomic ties to Melbourne and Adelaide than Sydney. Forexample, at Moama on the Murray River, seven boxes of claypipes were imported from Victoria to New South Wales in thelast three months of 1864, while nine boxes went in theopposite direction in the same period.as

Although the colonial statistics are notoriously difficult touse a systematic study should be able to establish generalpattems of clay pipe importation, re-export and trade structure.

Export from the Colonies

In l83l Sydney clay pipe maker Joseph Elliott claimed to beable to expedite export orders,oo and already by the start ofthenineteenth century it is claimed that pipes made in New SouthWales were being sold in England and Europe."' Apart fromthese early instances, our knowledge of both the export ofcolonial clay pipes or ofthe re-export ofBritish pipes to othercolonies is derived from trade statistics. Typical trade figures(Tables l, 2) show that although there were many individualdestinations, these were almost all either aimed for the Pacificislands, or to the other Australian colonies. For the years1869-1881 the value ofexport pipes ranged between 4 percentand 12.6 percent of the value of pipe imports for the sameperiod.a6

It is unclear whether pipes destined for the Pacific and otherAustralian colonies were ordered direct from Great Britain, orwhether orders were placed with merchants in Sydney, whofilled them from available stock. Some answers may beavailable from a close analysis of assemblages in the Pacificislands and work on the records of key merchants.

Production in the Colonies

Despite Sydney's early development of a pottery industry tocater for local demand there does not appear to have been anycommercial production of clay pipes in.Australia until WilliamCluer began production in about 1804."'

The data on local production is scanty and relies heavily onthe 1828 Census. Systematic work by Wilson indicates thatthere were at least I I pipe-makers operating in Sydney withinthe period from 1804 to before 1850 (Table 3). The reliance

upon the 1828 census may falsely suggest a peak around thatparticular date. What is clear, however, is that there was a realdecline in local manufacture in the late I 830s and I 840s.

The cause ofthe decline can only be guessed at. It may havecoincided with the general collapse ofthe colonial economy inthe early 1840s, or may have been brought about because thesmall local pipe-makers could not compete with increasinglycheap Scottish and possibly Dutch imports. In December 183 IJoseph Elliott advertised that he was reducing his wholesaleprice of pipes from 5 shillings to 4 shillings per gross. A weekiater the- price was reduced further to Z-sliillings 6 pence.a8Elliott survived to operate for another seven years.

Among the names of known Sydney pipe-makers are twoCluers and three Elliotts. The family relationships of theindividuals are unclear, but it was common in Britain forseveral generations of the same family to continue a trade inpipe-making, -either in succession or operatingsimultaneously."' According to Wilson the operations allappear to be small, some of the pipe-makers having productsappearing under their own nam-e, while a few worked asemployees of other pipe-makers.so

The presence of Mary Cluer, also known as Mary Morgan(Table 3), is not surprising, as many women traditionallyworked with their husbands in the smaller pipe-making firms,perhaps with several apprentices. Mary (Morgan) Cluer'sexperience of continuing to operate as a pipe-maker after thedeath of her husbands was a common one in the nineteenthcentury among pipe-making families.5 |

Trade figures for Victoria in 1864 note that locally madepipes were being exported to New South Wales and NewZealand. No mention is made in Victorian production statisticsof the presence of clay pipe manufacturers, but this may bebecause of the small size of the industry or because it was aminor sideline of the larger potteries."

Consumption

This is the least understood part of the life-cycle of clay pipesand the one where archaeological evidence needs to be reliedupon the most. Having already noted the general socialdistinctions in the consumption of tobacco and the use of claypipes, it is possible to examine in more detail particularsituations where pipes were used, to get an understanding ofhow the archaeological data reflects social or economicbehaviour in particular circumstances.

Table 1: lmports and exports of clay pipes in selected years, New South Wales only. (Sfatistical Register of /Vew Soufh Wales,1864'1 878, 188'l .) Figures represent number of cases per annum.

I 864lmports Exports

(cases)

1 878

lmports Exports(cases)

1 881

lmports Exports

Great Britain

Victoria

Sth Australia

Queensland

Tasmania

New Zealand

Pte. De Galle

USA

South Sea ls.

China

New Caledonia

Honolulu

Cape Gd Hope

1 290

94

10

294,|

I

1

577

1

55

't83

9

3

29554552122

11J

o

2

47

310257

175

't84,l

5862 I

292 7

114 26

5 397212

18 440

4308

4

43

44

Page 8: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

1 864

lmports Exports

IEQ

442

63I

d thata real

; haverny inse thesinglyr l83lrlesale, week:nce.ot

re twoof therin forade inratingns alloductsled as

,{organionally: f i rms,lluer'sfter theeteenth

r maded Newaristicsmay betwasa

ry plpese relied

socialof clay

rticularding of:onomic

s, 1864,

rable 2: lmports and exports of pipes (clay, wood an:firr9:[r:::ift[",,;;fff$ii"rs, Victoria only (sfafisficat Resister for the

lmports

3: Britain\SW.S:r Aust.

rrZ

-:ng Kong

Sa-rca

;:cerdam

-ar-Curg

l.-a'erte

' r*:ie denotes Victorian manufacture

Clal pipes were probably distributed from a wide variety ofiri:Es- pubs and other outlets. Tobacconists were a majors:lnc.::r of pipes and smokers' requisites and account for most: j --- : kno* n examples of Australian firms advertising directly,,tr{:- clal pipes. Examples marked 'DIXSON' andi r"':':,\.ELL', both tobacconists, are common, and are found

;n :rrned pipes, meaning that Scottish firms produced ther,r€-s:r order. Advertising for particular brands of tobacco,:i.rr- :s 'Conqueror' and 'Sunflower', is also common.

.: sddition to specialist suppliers, there would probably berr: :r:!lem in buying a clay pipe in any pub, corner store orh :rr :irran's establishment. Many English pubs suppliedtre: ::- to drinkers, a practice which may also have operatedm :* :.-lonies. Fowler records:

':. cuttv is of all shapes, sizes and shades. Some are'e=o heads, set with rows of very white teeth - someir: :rermaids, showing their more presentable halves

-: re front of the bowls, and stowing away their weedy:-::3ments under the items. Some are Turkish caps -i : r :3 are Russian skul ls. . .5 l

^':-.e rhis clearly expresses the diversity of known pipe

-,:re-o ::.,i the range found in some assemblages, at other sites

-oe 3: Pipe-makers operating in New South Wales between'!C4 and 18/t4. Based on information from Wilson (1988).

Known working delgs1804 - 182' l

1 828

1828

1828

1831 - 1837

1832 - 1837

1828

1822 - 1839

1821 -1832',

1828

' \:rE Llal rLlorgan) Cluer, wife of William Cluer, operated his:l'cErr.,:.s :-nng his absence overseas in 1821'2, and from aftern*R

-:: ^ 'A24 Reverted to the name Mary Cluer in 1832.

278251474

160

570

56388q

809480

67

there is a very restricted range of pipe types represented.

An example of deliberate choice in pipes is from CadmansCottage in the Rocks..A number of pipes were recovered fromexcavations in l988.to A large proportion of these were of thedudeen (lrish nawy) variety - thick-walled and short-stemmedwith a rouletted bowl rim (Fig. 7). Several of these had Irishslogans or symbols on the bowl, such as shamrocks and 'ERINGO BRAGH'. Some of the stems were stamped with the word'CORK', a variety found in several pipe-makers' catalogues.The context ofthe finds, many dating from the I 860s and I 870sduring the use of the Cottage as part of Sydney Sailors Home,was from the height of sectarian violence betweenAnglo-Saxons and lrish in Sydney. So intense was thesectarianism that in 1868 the travelling Prince Alfred was shotby a would-be assassin, the-self-confessed Fenian (lrishliberationist) Henry O'Farrell." Ironically the assassinationattempt took place at a fund-raising picnic for the SailorsHome.

While we have no documentary evidence that there wereIrish occupants at Cadmans Cottage, the predominance of Irishpipes strongly supports their presence. The sailors who stayedat the Home were both from international vessels andinter-colonial ships. The Irish-born formed a large proportionof the -c-olony's transport workers and labourers during thisperiod.'o

The parad_ing ofan identity through pipes, in this case Irish,is very clear." Pipes, like other accessories, can serve as a clearand unambiguous identifier of a person's social affiliation andhence have-an important role in socially divided societies.5sOccurring in a time when there was sectarian violence, thedisplay of Irishness cannot be seen as a neutral act, but onecharged with the desire to identifl with a faction and toconfront.

Interestingly, no lrish pipes are recorded from Port Arthur,which covered the same period, nor are they common inCanada. The Port Arthur authorities may h-ave deliberatelysuppressed their use as a provocative symbol. '"

There appears to be a consistent difference between somesites that exhibit large numbers of pipes with a great amount ofvariability, while other sites seem to be dominated by one ortwo types of pipe, with a small number of other typesrepresented. Whether this reflects a difference in site function

908

* d s-gl

/m 6- 3t'^

.,ar-es I c<ens

k:rp E 'ctt.r:s€ar I c::

iar-+ I ctt-*Eres :'cst

. i :raa- -eakrl l lga-" lt:-:3n

-rg-es R:,,gLand

45

Page 9: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

and consumption patterns or represents vagaries inarchaeological sampling is unclear. It is an issue that needs tobe explored further.

THE COLONIAL MARI(ET

A unique colonial market for particular clay pipe styles existedfrom at least the 1830s onwards, in the sense of a group ofconsumers in a particular place with preference for a restrictedvariety oftypes of pipe decoration. Walker notes that one of thereasons the Scottish manufacturers had such extensive rangeswas to be able to cater to the diverse tastes of the differentcolonies, such as the West African preference for large bowledpipes.60

Evidence of a distinct Australian market consists of certainpipe types which were clearly produced with the Australiancolonies in mind. One example is of pipes with a stem marked'SQUATTERS BUDGEREE', which has been found on anumber of Australian sites (Fig. 8). The term 'budgeree',meaning good, was derived originally from Aboriginallanguages around Port Jackson, and eventually entered colonialslang.o' One maker has been identified from a field suwey of apipe-making location in Rainford, northwest England."'A stemfragment which features a partial 'SQUAT... ' / ' ...GEREE'was found among possibly redeposited kiln waste in a field. Ithas been tentatively attributed to David Swallow, a pipe makerwho operated in the area from c.1860 to 1880.

Further evidence that local consumers had particular tastes,which rnay have been considered unorthodox, can be found in areport prepar€d by Governor Ralph Darling, on the bushrangerJack Donahoe, the Wild Colonial Boy. In September l83lDonahoe was killed and Darling notes:

A pipe maker was permitted to take a cast of his headshowing a bullet wound in the forehead...The pipemaker made clay pipes, the bowl bearing q facsimile ofthe cast, and these pipes had a large sale.o'

Although the pipe-maker referred to is not known, Sydneypipe-maker Samuel Elliott produced a pipe showing the head ofKing William at about the same period.* Whether thismonarch had a particular meaning to the colonial smoker is notknown, but the production of such effigy pipes appears to havebeen quite common in the Australian colonies in the 1830s.Many fragments of effigy pipes have been found on colonialsites of this period, and the designs appear to be stylisticallysimilar to the King William pipe, possibly indicating colonial

production. Effigy pipes of a much finer standard wereproduced by French and Dutch manufacturers and importedinto Australia, including a fine shrouded death's head bowlfound in the demolition layers of the First Government Housesi te c.1845.65

From the mid nineteenth century the Scottishmanufacturers also began producing pipes for the colonialmarket. McDougall produced a variety of pipes for this market,including avariety called'Sydney', available in small, mediumand large sizes, as well as 'Carved Sydney', 'AmericanSydney' and 'Sydney cutty'. William White produced shortand long 'Australian', 'Bent Squatter', 'Kangaroo' and manyother examples are known.- The earliest of these pipes can bedated to the 1850s from the manufacturers' price lists, and thiscoincides with the dramatic population increase brought aboutby the gold rushes. From then on all ofthe Scottish pipe-makersregularly added Australian titles to their range.

The existence of a colonial market with particularpreferences prompts a number of questions, including the needto better define what those preferences were and whether theywere uniform throughout colonial society or differed accordingto class or origin. Of interest too is how well did the preferencefor particular types ofpipe relate to other aspects ofthe creationof a colonial, and ultimately national, identity."'

DATING

Clay pipes are routinely used to date deposits through directdetermination of terminus post quem, generally based upontheir manufacturers, but there are other datingortechnigueswhich may prove useful in the Australian context. '

The first dating procedure is typological, based upon theidentification of the products of individual pipe-makers, whoare able to be dated by reference to trade directories andcensuses. As nearly all pipes are marked with makers' initialsor names this is feasible for a large proportion of assemblages.During the last third of the nineteenth century there was a trendaway from marking every pipe type, and many examples foundin Australia carry no maker's name. The work of Oswaldprovides an encyclopaedic overview ofthe clay pipe industry inBritain, and research is continually refining local chronologiesof clay pipe manufacture.o"

The work presented in Davey is especially relevant toAustralian clay pipe research as it deals exclusively withScottish pipe-makers, many of whose products dominate late

MI

il1frnil

rtrIlnrl

iLrn[!hu,t

qt

fr*tl,lr[m

1['il!

ililhfr1L.l(

I

rLfihfr1r

oldlll

il

HLllu

rp

020

- lmm

Fig. g: The 'SeUATTERS BIJDGEREE' pipe, producedfor the Australian colonies, and commonlyfound on nineleenlh-cenlury Auslralian sites. (Drawn b\'

Ceorgia Rennie.)

46

ld

trnlIu

'til

il1:

FIIrnhm.iluIN

th'4t0:

x,l:

rf

Page 10: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

werePorted: bowll{ouse

:ottishllonialrarket,edium:ericanI shortimanycan bend this: aboutnakers

'ticular:e needer theyrording

reation

l directJ upon'Jlrques

rcn thes. whoes andinitialsblages.a trend

s foundOsrvaldustry inologies

\ ant to.1 rvith3re late

- :.:Ieenth-century clay pipe assemblages in Australia.T0- :.:onunately many ofthe major exporters to Australia, such as'. i:)ougall and Will iam White, operated for long periods and:: :rav not provide useful dating information on the basis of a-:-::facturer's name on a stem.

.{ second approach is also typological, but relies upon the-:::-rnation available in the pipe-makers' catalogues.: -:unately, complete price lists dating to 1900 are available':: all of the Scottish exporting pipe-makers." These lists:-:" ide a sequential catalogue number for each type of pipe,--: :ame of each pipe variety and price per gross. Assuming---.: :he catalogue numbers were given as new clay pipe types"::: introduced, the personality pipes, representing popular';-:es or, occasionally, polit ical issues, to provide

-::..rimate dates for the introduction of all types.

:. comprehensive list of all identified personality pipes- - : :ne Scottish manufacturers' price lists is being prepared. "- j ::3 sequence of personality dates identified to date are:=-::all l consistent with the numbering sequence they can be-..::. albeit with caution, in extrapolating the dates of- : : : : : ; t ion ofother pipe types.

:. lhird dating technique is based upon the calculation of-:::. iates from a sample of clay pipe stem fragments. This::-:.:;ue rvas originally developed by Harrington, who noted"-:: ::.3 average diameter ofthe stem bore decreased through-: Dating an assemblage was done by producing a

' :::;:3m of stem bore diameters, and comparing it with the-:- ::ron histograms. Binford developed a regression

- - .: * h ich used individual pipe stem diameters and a mean-.. - - ::ed rvhich produced a single mean date for an__ : _.JYC.

".,.:--Hurn. used a well-dated samp-le of clay pipe stem'--;-i:rs to test the Binford formula." The formula only-i:..:: :o nork well only between 1680 and 1760, probably':-:-j3 at the latter date a practical minimum stem bore: r-_::3: * as-reached. Experiments on Australian assemblages_ -- - . : : is . '

-_ i - I \CLf SIONS

': : :r .rf this paper was to provide a context for further': "::::- into clay tobacco pipe assemblages from sites in- -:---: : and elsewhere. While generally descriptive it is' : ' :: :., i : enough information on the social and economic role

: :.. :rpe use has been provided to assist in providing a-*:..:- ::pth of interpretation than has been previously- . . . . :

-.1 ontt been possible to sketch some of the social: r: , -;: jps ri 'hich can be investigated by clay pipes. Clearly,

. : - :':; had a use as an indicator of class. and from this- - -- :;;ked up a connotation of low status which was used

:.: :: ::rd stereotype people. Within Aboriginal and other- -i ' j -=. ;ommunities which existed on the fringes ofi': ]-::.: or in dependent situations tobacco may also have",:-: '- : : - -. of social and economic control.

- - -

::.-nonric circumstances within which clay pipes were,'- :--::. ::aded and used were also only ableto be studied as ai- : ' : -: tarticular examples. These showed that the- - ' : : , - : . : : l evidence was able to useful ly supplement the". ' . - : : :e;ord and to develop an understanding of the:-. -;: i i ! .:.r". lved which are not available from documentary

,--.. :s:E;iallf important is the identif ication of a colonial- --1 :- . -.:h preferred certain products and was catered forby' ' : - -:: ' - : -. i particular types of pipe to appeal to that market.- ' :

- , -s :3rat ion of the developing sel f ident i ty ofAustral ian- ': --::: :.nd their use of tobacco pipes to represent their

- :.. :- ::.rrical attitudes and affi l iations requires further, -, r -r :..s been shown to be a particularly promising area of

The creation offurther dating tools based upon the formalcharacteristics of individual pipe types or assemblages requiremore development. Opportunities exist to define theintroduction date ofidentifiable types ofpersonality and otherpipes that act as temporal markers.

Dating pipes by stem diameters does not appear to operatewell in the nineteenth century, but further consideration andsystematic recording of other gradual changes, such asdiminution of spurs or changes in the lettering of makers marksmay provide important dating clues for use in archaeology.

This paper has been general both because it is attempting todescribe the social context of clay pipe use, and also becausethere is a real lack of available material on clay pipes inAustralia. Few studies, whether descriptive or analytical, haveever been fully published, and until this is reversed the potentialthat clay pipes offer as ideal artefacts will not be fulfilled. Wewould certainly argue that far more effort needs to be spent inmaking the results of archaeological excavations accessible,and that this is especially important for clay pipes, which arefound on most sites, and have abundant analytical potential.

Nearly every topic raised in this paper requires furtherresearch. Most of the examples come from New South Wales,and it is reasonable to ask whether this was typical of the othercolonies. There are quite good reasons why it would notnecessarily be so at all. We have shown that productiveresearch on clay pipes from Australian sites is possible, and thatthe archaeologist is not confined to the production oftypologies. The potential exists to conduct research on the useof clay pipes, the mechanisms ofthe trade, their symbolism andtheir archaeology from sites all over Australia. This frameworkis therefore offered as a starting point to allow future studies tobe better directed towards questions that matter. Nothing in thispaper is considered to be definitive, nor is any of it likely toremain unchanged by later research. We began this paper with adescription of the many reasons why clay pipes were worthy ofstudy. lt is our hope that this paper has gone further in showinghow such studies can be done, and how they can build up abetter picture of Australian colonial life.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Graham Wilson, for discussions overmany years and allowing us to use his unpublished research,and Georgia Rennie, for drawing the illustrations in this paper.Hilary du Cros did the work on the Little Lonsdale Street pipes,under the supervision of Justin McCarthy and David Bannear.We were alerted to obscure references by John Meredith (BoldJack Donahoe) and Martin Carney (Fowler's account). BillJeffery provided us with a copy of the unpublished lr'gressreport. Jeannette Hope, Giles Hamm and Brian Egloff provideduseful comments on earlier drafts of this paper, as did severalanonymous referees.

ABBREVIATIONS

AND Australian National Dictionary

HCTPS Historic Clay Tobacco Pipe Studies

SCPR Society for Clay Pipe ResearchSH Sydney Herald

NOTBS

I Dane and Morrison 1979.2 Jack 1986.

3 Walker 1977.4 Fresco-Corbu 1982.

5 Walker 1977:211-244.

6 Oswald 1975, Walker 1977.

III

II

1ll

).,ztrn b),

47

Page 11: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

7 Walker 1977 provides detailed accounts of clay pipemanufacture.

8 Gallagher 1987.

9 Brassey 1991.

l0 Gallagher 1989.ll Godden 1964:ll.

12 Higginbotham 1991.

l3 Wilson 1988.

14 One example was found at Lilyvale, The Rocks, Sydney.G. Wilson pers. comm.

l5 Etter 1980, Ritchie 1986, Wylie and Fike 1993.16 Walker 1977:3.

17 Huey 1974; Walker 1976; Parker 1988.

l8 Fowler 1859.

19 King and Pogue 1987.

20 M. Green pers. comm., also a series of papers in SCPRNewsletter 50 (1996).

2l Walker 1977.

22 Authors - personal observation.

23 Walker 1984.

24 Mann 18l l :43.

25 Kiddle 1962:63-64.

26 Walker 1984.

27 Harris 1847:5.

28 Sharkey 1988:38.

29 Walker 1977:327.

30 Fowler 1859.

3l Walker 1984:15-19.

32 E.g. Birmingham 1976:313-314.

33 Walker 1984.

34 Arnold 1977, Gallagher and Sharp 1986, Walker 1977.

35 Mann l8 l l :43.

36 Studies of shipwreck material show that'odd' pipes seemto be common items among crews' personal effects, e.g.Vergulde Draeck - Jack (1990),HMS Pandora - Davey(re8e).

37 Statistical Register of New South ll/ales, 1864:Table 4l .

38 Harris 1986. Another wreck the Blencathra, wrecked atCurrie, King Island, also contains a large number of claypipes made by Davidson. Some of these have beencollected by local divers and one of the authors (IMS) isstudying the collection.

39 Wilson and Kelly 1987.

40 Maclehose 1839:183.

4l Wilson and Kelly 1987;1.

42 Statistical Registerfor the Colony ofVictoria.

43 Statistical Register ofNew South l4/ales,1864:Tables 86,

44

45

46i1

48

49

50

5l

52

48

87.

sH 26.t2.1831.

Lawson 1971, quoted in Wilson and Kelly 1987:.l-2.

Statistical Register of New South Ll/ales, 1 869- 1 88 1.

Higginbotham 1987; Wilson 1988.

SH 26.12.1831: 3: SH 2.1.1832:3.

Walker 1977.

Wilson 1988.

Walker 1977:174.

Arnold Levin operated as a pipe maker in Melbournefrom 1872 to at least 1888. Kris Courtney pers. comm.

Fowler 1859.

Gojak 1989, 1995.Amos 1988.McConville 1984.

Gojak 1991.Wobst 1977.

Dane and Monison 1979 for Port Arthur. For Canada seeWalker 1983, with Kraemer 1988 and Alexander 1986 fora contrary perspective.

60 1983:18.61 AND:102.

Gojak 1995; Dagnall 1996; Ron Dagnall pers. comm.

Quoted in Meredith 1982.Wilson and Kelly 1987:18, Type 012.Wilson and Kelly 1987-cover illustration.

Gallagher 1987.

Gojak 1991.

E.g. Dane and Monison 1979.

See Oswald 1975 SCPR Newsletter, the Archaeologt ofthe Clay Tobacco Pipe series and Historic Clay TobaccoPipe Studies.

70 1987.

7l72731A

7576

Gallagher 1987.

Stuart and Gojak in preparation.

Walker 1972.

Walker 1972.

No€l-Hume 1970.

Dane and Morrison 1979.

BIBLIOGRAPITY

ALEXANDER, L. T. 1986. 'Clay pipes with Irish affiliations',Historic Clay Tobacco Pipe Studies 3:69-75.

AMOS, K. 1988. The Fenians in Austalia 1865-1880,University of New South Wales Press, Kensington.

ARNOLD, C. J. 1977.'The clay tobacco-pipe industry: Aneconomic study,' in D.P.S. Peacock (ed.) Pottery and earlycommerce: Characterization and trade in Roman and laterceramics, Academic Press, London, pp. 313-336.

BIRMINGHAM, J. 197 6.'The archaeological contribution tonineteenth-century history: Some Australian case studies',W or ld Arc hae ologt 7 :306-3 17 .

BRASSEY, R. 1991. 'Clay tobacco pipes from the site of theVictoria Hotel, Auckland, New Zealand', AustralianHis toric al Arc hae o I ogt 9 :27 -30.

DAGNALL, R. 1996. 'Squatter's budgeree pipe', SocietyforClay Pipe Research Newsletter 50:53-55.

DANE, A. and R. MORRISON. 1979. Clay pipes from PortArthur 1830-1877, Department of Prehistory RSPacS,Australian National University, Canberra.

DAVEY, P. (ed.) 1987. The archaeologt of the clay tobaccopipe. X. Scotland, British Archaeological Reports, BritishSeries I 78.

DAVEY, P. 1991. 'Stone pipe from the wreck of HMSPandora', Society for Clay Pipe Research Newsletter,30:23-24.

ETTER, P. A. 1980. 'The west coast Chinese and opiumsmoking', in R.L. Schuyler (ed.) Archaeologicalperspectives on ethnicity in America, Baywood Publishing,Farmingdale, pp. 97-101.

FOWLER, F. 1859. Southern lights and shades, quoted in B.Groom and W. Wickman (eds), Sydney - The i,850s: The

5354))56) t

5859

6263646566676869

Page 12: Archaeological Potential of Clay Pipes

iada see986 for

clog of'obacco

iations',

15- I 880,

stry': An:nd earlynd later

lution tostudies',

re of thestralian

ciety for

'om PortR.SPacS,

tobacco:. Brit ish

..f HMSt sletter,

.J opium:ological;blishing,

ted in B..:0s: The

Lost Collections, Historic Photographs Collection,University of Sydney.

:3.ESCO-CORBU, R. 1982. European prpes, LutterworthPress, Guildford.

- LLLAGHER, D. B. 1987. 'The 1900 price l ist of the Pipe\lakers' Society', in P. Davey (ed.) The archaeology of the:la\, tobacco pipe. X. Scotland, British ArchaeologicalReports, Brit ish Series 178, pp.142-164.

: l.LLAGHER, D. B. 1989. 'TW pipes: Their origins anddevelopment', Society for Clay Pipe Research Newsletter22:\-7.

: iLLAGHER. D. and R. PPRICE. 1987. 'Thomas Davidsonand Co., Glasgow', in P. Davey (ed.) The archaeology of:)te clay tobacco pipe. X. Scotland, British ArchaeologicalR.eports, Brit ish Series 178, pp. I l0-138.

J:.I-LAGHER, D. B. and A. SHARP. 1986. Pypes of tabaca:ldinburgh lobacco pipemakers and lheir pipes, City of

-dinburgh

District Council Museums and Art Galleries,id inburgh.

j - )DEN, G. A. 1964. Encyclopaedia of British pottery and::rcelain marks,Barrie and Jenkins, London.

- --\K. D. 1989. Cadmans Cottage archaeological project.r38: Interim report to Comrealty Pty Ltd, report held by\'ational Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney.

- -- '1.K. D. 1991. Ethnicity and nationalism in nineteenth-::nrury Sydney, paper presentedto l99l Rocks and Millers? :int Historical Archaeology Workshop, Sydney.

- - . 1.K. D. 1995. 'Clay tobacco pipes from Cadmans Cottage,>_' Jnel', Australia', Society for Clay Pipe Research

": ' ;s let ter48:I l -19.- . l3lS. A. ['Emigrant Mechanic'] 1847 (1964). Settlers and

-'-n jcts: Recollections of sixteen years' labour in the::;tralian bachuoods, Melbourne University Press,* .1: .bourne.

- . LtlS. C. A. (compiler) 1986. The discovery and survey of-.. \treck of theTigress, Society for Underwater Historical:.: 'earch Inc., North Adelaide.

- - l.\BOTHAM, E. 1987. 'The excavation of buildings in-- : early township of Parramatta, New South Wales,

-:-- I 820s', Australian Historical Archaeology 5:3-20.- J.\BOTHAM, E. 1991. Report on the archaeological

..,:aralions in Macquarie Place, Sydney, New South'" :.es. report to Peddle Thorp and Walker, Sydney.

- -: ' :. P. R. 1974. 'Reworked pipe stems: A 17th century:-3:1.rmenon from the site of Fort Orange, Albany, New':

-: '* ' . Historical Archaeology 8:105-l I l .. --\. R L 1986. 'Clay tobacco pipes exported from Scotland

:: r.ustralia in the nineteenth century: Some preliminary: :,.er ations', Historic Clay Tobacco Pipe Studies_- . : r -13,1,

- - (. 3. 1. l990. 'Clay pipes from Thailand', Societyfor Clay: : : ?,e search lr/ewsletter 27 :15-18.

. ll-:. \1. 1962. Men of yesterday: A social history of the' :.:!rn District of Victoria 1834-1890, Melbourne- :.r ersirr Press, Melbourne.

. ' . : ' . .\. and D. J. POGUE. 1987. 'An unusual pipestemi- : : iom St In igoes Manor, Maryland'Histor ical- - : : : : t !ogy 2 I (1) :102-104.

' ; :=t . ' !3. . E. 1988'An Ir ish theme pipe from the South:.,::.:: School site,' Profi le: Nevsletter of the Toronto

'-::. ' Onrario .lrchaeological Society 7 (l):10-11.

- - ,::\. \\ ' . 1971. 'A history of industrial pottery::-:-;t ion in New South Wales', Journal of the Royal- " :.:.:, i tt Historical Society 57:17-39.

MCCONVILLE, C. M. 1984. Migrant Irish and suburbanCatholics 185 l-1933, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Universityof Melbourne.

MACLEHOUSE, J. 1839 (1977). Picture of Sydney andstrangers' guide in New South l4tales for /839, facsimileedition, John Ferguson, Sydney.

MANN, D. D. 1 8 I I ( 1979). The present picture of New SouthIlales I8l I, facsimile edition, John Ferguson, Sydney.

MEREDITH. J. 1982. The Donahoe Ballads. Red RoosterPress, Ascot Vale.

NOEL-HUME, I. 1970. 'Tobacco pipes and smokingequipment', in L No€l-Hume A guide to artifacts ofcolonial America, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, pp.296-313.

OSWALD, A. 1975. Clay pipes for the archaeologist, BritishArchaeological Reports, British Series 14.

PARKER, K. 1988. 'A use for broken pipe stems', SocietyforClay Pipe Research Newsletter 17 12-13.

RITCHIE, N. 1986. Archaeology and history of the Chinese insouthern New Zealand during the nineteenth century: Astudy of acculturation, adaptation and change, unpublishedPh.D. thesis, University of Otago.

SHARKEY, O. 1988. Cammon knowledge: The lrishness ofeveryday things, McPhee Gribble, Melbourne.

STATISTICAL REGISTER OF NEW SOUTH IyALES

STATISTICAL REGISTER FORTHECOLONY OF V]CTONA

STUART, I. M. and D. GOJAK. in preparation.Comprehensive list of personality pipe types produced bynineteenth-century Scottish exporters.

SYDNEY HERALD

WALKER, l. C. 1972. 'Binford, science and history: Theprobabilistic variability of explicated epistemology andnomothetic paradigms in historical archaeology',Conference on Historic Site Archaeologt Papers 7(3): I 59-201.

WALKER, L C. 1976.'Alternative uses for clay tobacco pipesand tobacco pipe fragments: Some notes', HistoricalArc hae ol ogt 10:124-127 .

WALKER, l. C. 1977. Clay tobacco pipes with particularreference to the Bristol industry, Parks Canada, History andArchaeology I l.

WALKER, I. C. 1983. 'Nineteenth-century clay tobacco-pipesin Canada', in P. Davey (ed.) The archaeolog,t of the claytobacco pipe. VIII. America, British ArchaeologicalReports, International Series 175, pp. 1-87.

WALKER, R. 1984. Underfire: A history of tobacco smokingin Australia, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne.

WILSON, G.C. 1988. Preliminary list of Sydney clay tobaccopipe makers and distributors, unpublished manuscript.

WILSON, G. C. and A. KELLY. 1987. Preliminary analysis ofclay tobacco pipes from the First Government House site,Sydney, Department of Planning, Sydney.

WOBST, H. M. 1977.'stylistic behaviour and informationexchange', in C.E. Cleland (ed.), For the Director:Research essays in honour of James B. Grffin,Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology,Universi ty of Michigan, No.6l , pp.3l7-342.

WYLIE, J. and R. E. FIKE. 1993. 'Chinese opium smokingtechniques and paraphernalia', in P. Wegars (ed.), Hiddenheritage: Historical archaeologt of lhe overseas Chinese,Baywood, Amityvil le, pp. 255-303.

49