7
E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L S G E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P How does architecture produce a person that is both a citizen and a high-security felon, or that is one or the other? Furthermore, how does architecture produce an entire society of subjects? To probe these questions, the project will use prisons as a lens to explore the following architectural themes related to subject formation: (1) sanitation, (2) observation and (3) security. Beginning in England, the birthplace of the modern penal institution, I will travel through France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark, visiting and researching one “primary” prison per country. Whether it be the Netherlands’s Arnhem Prison (one of the world’s few built panopticons), Denmark’s Horsens State Prison (an archetype of post-reform era institutions) or Belgium’s Beveren Prison (one of a group of high-tech, newly built facilities in northern Europe), each “primary” prison exemplifies a particular penal typology. Visits to other prisons and museums will provide supplemental research. (It should be noted that I have selected only publicly accessible prisons.) I estimate the cost of the trip, to be taken in fall 2015, to be $9,000: $1,350 – Roundtrip airfare (New York to London and Copenhagen to New York) $6,300 – $150 per day for food, hostel lodging and local transportation for 42 days $650 – Eurail Select Pass $150 – Eurostar train London to Paris $200 – Roundtrip airfare (New York to Ann Arbor) $350 – Exhibition printing and material costs ank you kindly for your consideration. I am passionately hopeful for this opportunity. Sincerely, Elizabeth J. Nichols Date of birth: August 9, 1988 Phone: (757) 810 5905 Email: [email protected] Address: 680 Manhattan Avenue, Apartment 22, Brooklyn, NY 11222 1 Robin Evans, e Fabrication of Virtue: English Prison Architecture, 1750–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 1–8. Architecture as Subject-Maker: e Case of the Prison “A prisoner paints a landscape on the wall of his cell showing a miniature train entering a tunnel. When his jailers come to get him, he asks them ‘politely to wait a moment, to allow me to verify something in the little train in my picture. As usual, they started to laugh, because they considered me to be weak-minded. I made myself very tiny, entered into my picture and climbed into the little train, which started moving, then disappeared into the darkness of the tunnel. For a few seconds longer, a bit of flaky smoke could be seen coming out of the round hole. en this smoke blew away, and with it the picture, and with the picture, my person…’ ” — Gaston Bachelard, e Poetics of Space (1958) citing Hermann Hesse, Fontaine (1945) In 1750 England’s most infamous prison was Newgate, an overcrowded, verminous gaol buried in the defensive walls of London. To passersby, Newgate was discernable as a prison only for its street-side begging grate, from which Londoners could hear the wails of debtors and felons awaiting trial and execution. Architecturally-speaking, Newgate’s facade, as well as its internal arrangement, was indistinguishable from contemporaneous secular buildings. One hundred years later, however, this was no longer true for Newgate or any gaol. By 1850 reformers had institutionalized the English prison, and it emerged as a distinct architectural type. e new model prison was London’s machine-like, rigorously-designed Pentonville that embodied the reformers’ principles of surveillance and isolation. e begging grate of Newgate, the space through which not only voices but goods and capital were exchanged, was nowhere to be found at Pentonville. Pentonville’s architecture made it as severed from the city as its prisoners were from each other. For the first time the role of architecture had expanded (sometimes subtly but oſten plainly) beyond art and beyond utility to include human control. 1 Significantly, the design techniques that prisons employed then and today are not restricted to penal institutions. Since the nineteenth century, the methods through which architecture has managed sanitation, observation and security in prisons have been adopted for modern hospitals, factories, schools, housing and planning. Yet the prison, a lowly, frequently overlooked typology, remains the space where architecture, for better or worse, most realizes its capacity to construct subjects, affect behaviors and even define morality. I first became interested in prisons in a studio that explored the relationship between architecture, institutions and human subjectivity. I believe strongly in architecture’s ability to make, break or transform us as human subjects from the general (i.e. a citizen) to the specific (i.e. a high-security felon)—but how exactly does architecture do this? A B S T R A C T

Architecture as Subject-Maker: The Case of the Prison

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    How does architecture produce a person that is both a citizen and a high-security felon, or that is one or the other? Furthermore, how does architecture produce an entire society of subjects?

    To probe these questions, the project will use prisons as a lens to explore the following architectural themes related to subject formation: (1) sanitation, (2) observation and (3) security. Beginning in England, the birthplace of the modern penal institution, I will travel through France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark, visiting and researching one primary prison per country. Whether it be the Netherlandss Arnhem Prison (one of the worlds few built panopticons), Denmarks Horsens State Prison (an archetype of post-reform era institutions) or Belgiums Beveren Prison (one of a group of high-tech, newly built facilities in northern Europe), each primary prison exemplies a particular penal typology. Visits to other prisons and museums will provide supplemental research. (It should be noted that I have selected only publicly accessible prisons.)

    I estimate the cost of the trip, to be taken in fall 2015, to be $9,000:

    $1,350 Roundtrip airfare (New York to London and Copenhagen to New York)$6,300 $150 per day for food, hostel lodging and local transportation for 42 days$650 Eurail Select Pass$150 Eurostar train London to Paris$200 Roundtrip airfare (New York to Ann Arbor)$350 Exhibition printing and material costs

    ank you kindly for your consideration. I am passionately hopeful for this opportunity.

    Sincerely,

    Elizabeth J. Nichols

    Date of birth: August 9, 1988Phone: (757) 810 5905Email: [email protected]: 680 Manhattan Avenue, Apartment 22, Brooklyn, NY 11222

    1 Robin Evans, e Fabrication of Virtue: English Prison Architecture, 17501840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), 18.

    Architecture as Subject-Maker: e Case of the Prison

    A prisoner paints a landscape on the wall of his cell showing a miniature train entering a tunnel. When his jailers come to get him, he asks them politely to wait a moment, to allow me to verify something in the little train in my picture. As usual, they started to laugh, because they considered me to be weak-minded. I made myself very tiny, entered into my picture and climbed into the little train, which started moving, then disappeared into the darkness of the tunnel. For a few seconds longer, a bit of aky smoke could be seen coming out of the round hole. en this smoke blew away, and with it the picture, and with the picture, my person Gaston Bachelard, e Poetics of Space (1958) citing Hermann Hesse, Fontaine (1945)

    In 1750 Englands most infamous prison was Newgate, an overcrowded, verminous gaol buried in the defensive walls of London. To passersby, Newgate was discernable as a prison only for its street-side begging grate, from which Londoners could hear the wails of debtors and felons awaiting trial and execution. Architecturally-speaking, Newgates facade, as well as its internal arrangement, was indistinguishable from contemporaneous secular buildings. One hundred years later, however, this was no longer true for Newgate or any gaol. By 1850 reformers had institutionalized the English prison, and it emerged as a distinct architectural type. e new model prison was Londons machine-like, rigorously-designed Pentonville that embodied the reformers principles of surveillance and isolation. e begging grate of Newgate, the space through which not only voices but goods and capital were exchanged, was nowhere to be found at Pentonville. Pentonvilles architecture made it as severed from the city as its prisoners were from each other. For the rst time the role of architecture had expanded (sometimes subtly but oen plainly) beyond art and beyond utility to include human control.1

    Signicantly, the design techniques that prisons employed then and today are not restricted to penal institutions. Since the nineteenth century, the methods through which architecture has managed sanitation, observation and security in prisons have been adopted for modern hospitals, factories, schools, housing and planning. Yet the prison, a lowly, frequently overlooked typology, remains the space where architecture, for better or worse, most realizes its capacity to construct subjects, aect behaviors and even dene morality.

    I rst became interested in prisons in a studio that explored the relationship between architecture, institutions and human subjectivity. I believe strongly in architectures ability to make, break or transform us as human subjects from the general (i.e. a citizen) to the specic (i.e. a high-security felon)but how exactly does architecture do this?

    A B S T R A C T

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    P R O P O S A L

    1 H E R M A J E S T Y P R I S O N D A R T M O O R , D E V O N , E N G L A N D ( 1 8 1 2 )Days 0110Fly New York to LondonSee Newgate Prison, the Clink Museum and the Tower of London and conduct research at the British Library and the Royal Institute of British Architects in LondonSee Her Majesty Prison Dartmoor in DevonSee Malmaison Oxford in OxfordSee Buckingham Old Gaol in Buckingham (time permitting)

    2 L A S A N T P R I S O N , P A R I S , F R A N C E ( 1 8 6 7 )Days 1116Train London to ParisSee La Sant Prison in ParisSee the National Museum of Prisons in Fontainebleau

    3 B E V E R E N P R I S O N , B E V E R E N , B E L G I U M ( 2 0 1 3 )Days 1722Train Paris to GhentConduct research on the Maison de Force in GhentSee Beveren Prison in Beveren (near Arnhem)

    4 A R N H E M P R I S O N , A R N H E M , T H E N E T H E R L A N D S ( 1 8 8 6 )Days 2329Train Antwerp to Arnhem (or Breda)See Breda Prison in Breda (time permitting) See Arnhem Prison in Arnhem/AntwerpSee Haarlem Prison and the Bijlmerbajes prison complex in Amsterdam

    5 S T A S I P R I S O N , B E R L I N , G E R M A N Y ( 1 9 3 9 )Days 3036Train Arnhem (or Amsterdam) to BerlinSee Stasi Prison and the Moabit Prison Historical Park in BerlinSee JVA Fuhlsbuettel prison complex in Hamburg

    6 H O R S E N S S T A T E P R I S O N , H O R S E N S , D E N M A R K ( 1 8 5 3 )Days 3742Train Berlin (or Hamburg) to HorsensSee Horsens State Prison and the East Jutland State Prison in Horsens Fly Copenhagen to New York

    1

    3

    5

    2

    4

    6

    In addition to a travel blog, the research will take two forms: a small-format publication and large-format drawings. While there does exist survey texts on the history of prisons, such as Johnston Normans Forms of Constraints (2003), there is no accessible, graphically-rich publication that allows one to compare penal institutions across time and space in architectural terms. is is partly because the work of documenting prisons falls to photographers and journalists. erefore, I would like to publish (online and in print) the research of the six prisons in a format similar to WORKacs 49 Cities (2009) with original text, drawings, diagrams and photographs. With the publication as a foundation, the large-format drawings will be a means to examine architecture and subject formation through unconstrained, unsystematic means.

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    P O R T F O L I O | S T I T C H I N G A R C H I T E C T U R E

    C R I T I C Jason YoungY E A R 20132014 P R O J E C T M.Arch thesis exploring architectural representation in the context of todays post-natural blend of man, nature and machine (continues on the following two pages).

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    P O R T F O L I O | S T I T C H I N G A R C H I T E C T U R E ( C O N T . )

    Medieval Christian ideology posited man and nature as a single entity under the umbrella of God. Today in the Anthropocene, we will see a return to oneness and an erasure of the longstanding perspective of dualism established during the Renaissance. Today as smartphones extend our bodies, man, nature and machine will again be conceived of as a single entity (now under the umbrella of post-nature). e project explores architectural representation in the context of todays merging of man, nature and machine. It is a post-natural gardenscape with a set of architectural characters...

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    P O R T F O L I O | S T I T C H I N G A R C H I T E C T U R E ( C O N T . )

    ... e gardenscape functions to produce human subjectivities that are both animalistic (subjective) and machinic (objective). A blurring of animalism and machinism is achieved by both the architecture of the imagined spaces and the techniques used to represent those spaces. Each drawing couples perspective (subjective) drawing with plan and section (objective) drawing. ere is no site plan. Rather, the drawings relate to one another through the architectural characters. Human subjects barely occupy the imaged spaces; they are as unsure of their place in the gardenscape as we are in the Anthropocene today.

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    P O R T F O L I O | S E L E C T E D M O D E L S

    Y E A R 20112014 P R O J E C T S Selected models completed while at Taubman College. Clockwise from upper le : Villa Mller visitor center, scale 1:50; staircase, scale 1:10; leather and suede wall pocket, scale 1:1; 3D-printed scale gures; facade study, scale 1:300; pool installation diagram; walled maze, scale 1:500; theater, scale 1:50; Water ief Housing massing, scale 1:1000; facade study, scale 1:300; prison concept model, scale 1:100; PETG vacuum form study; pool installation (with collaborator Peter Halquist), scale 1:100.

  • E L I Z A B E T H N I C H O L SG E O R G E G . B O O T H T R A V E L I N G F E L L O W S H I P

    E X P E R I E N C E

    REX Architecture Junior Architect. New York, NY, September 2014PresentNecklace Residence. Lloyd Harbor, NY

    Leong Leong Architecture Architectural Intern. New York, NY, August 2014Competition for the Los Angeles LGBT Center. Los Angeles, CA

    Lee and Macgillivray Architecture StudioDesigner. Ann Arbor, MI, November 2013January 2014Competition for the 2014 MoMA PS1 Young Architects Program. Long Island City, NY

    Adams + Gilpin Design StudioDesigner. Ann Arbor, MI, MayAugust 2013Plum Market Cart Corral. Ann Arbor, MIUnderstanding the Role of the Built Environment for Mobility through Technology, University of Michigan MCubed Grant, Ann Arbor, MI

    MILLIGRAM-oceCuratorial Assistant. Ann Arbor, MI, MarchApril 2013Rights of Way: Mobility and the City at the Boston Society of Architects, Boston, MA

    Studio Daniel LibeskindArchitectural Intern. New York, NY, JuneJuly 2012Redevelopment masterplan for Archipelago 21. Yongsan Business Distric, Seoul, KoreaCentury Spire. Manila, PhilippinesL Tower. Toronto, Canada

    Habitat for Humanity InternationalBuilder. Phnom Phen, Cambodia and Chiang Mai, ailand, AprilMay 2011

    Sun Chang SchoolsEnglish Language Teacher. Gwangju, Korea, July 2010February 2011

    Smithsonian Institution ArchivesBook Conservation Intern. Washington, DC, JuneAugust 2007 and 2008

    E D U C A T I O N

    University of Michigan, Taubman College of Architecture and Urban PlanningM.Arch. with Distinction. Ann Arbor, MI, 20112014Taubman College Merit Scholarship. 20132014Linn and Grace Smith Memorial Scholarship. 20122013Architecture + Adaptation Research Travel Studio. Jakarta, Indonesia, 2012

    Vanderbilt UniversityB.A. History of Art. Nashville, TN, 20062010Frances and John Downing Research Travel Award. London, England, 2009Harvard University, Career Discovery Program. Cambridge, MA, 2009University of Auckland, Study Abroad Program. Auckland, New Zealand, 2008

    T E A C H I N G

    Taubman College of Architecture and Urban PlanningArch 323 History of Architecture. Instructor for Assoc. Prof. A. Herscher. 2014

    Taubman College of Architecture and Urban PlanningArch 589 Site Operations. Instructor for Assoc. Prof. G. n. 2013

    P U B L I C A T I O N S A N D E X H I B I T I O N S

    Contributor. Menteng by D. de Cespedes and E. Nichols in Jakarta: Architecture + Adaptation, eds. A. Bobbette, M. Miller and E. Turpin. 2013Featured work, exhibition designer. Futures of Hypercomplexity: Bangkok and Jakarta, Taubman Gallery. Ann Arbor, MI, 2013Contributor. Jakarta: Design Research and the Futures of Hypercomplexity by A. Bobbette, M. Miller and E. Turpin in MONU 17: New Urbanisms. 2012Featured work. Navigating the Postnatural, Salt + Cedar Gallery. Detroit, MI, 2012Featured work, exhibition designer. Cities of Hypercomplexity: Bangkok and Jakarta, Center for Southeast Asian Studies. Ann Arbor, MI, 2012Editor. Dimensions 25, eds. R. Chhabra, N. Mattson, E. Kutil, E. Nichols and S. Scharrer (received the Center for Architecture Foundations Douglas Haskell Award for Student Journals, Honorable Mention). 2012Featured work. Taubman College Student Show, CMYK Gallery. Ann Arbor, MI, 2012 (received Second Place), 2013 and 2014

    C U R R I C U L U M V I T A E