Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    1/26

    1

    Letters Archive Display

    Letters Archive Display

    Description:

    This archive of letters displays some responses that I receive in my long journey through scientific peer review journals. Although many lettersshow a rejection to my submission and some time deletion from theJournal Software system, they still some time contain some importantopinions and hints on how to deal with my scientific project.

  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    2/26

    2

    Dear Emad,

    Thank you for your e-mail. I did forward your previous e-mails to the editor in Chief of Advances in Space Research, though I understand that you hadsent the material to her before.

    Your studies are extremely interesting. Personally, I do not know how to judge them - I have no medical background. This means that I am not reallyaware of journals that would take such an interdisciplinary topic. Theymust exist somewhere. This is not much help to you. I am sorry.

    With regard to the bulletin that I edit, this is more of a newsletter and your desire is to present something more substantial and detailed than I wouldnormally include.

    I do wish you luck in this and feel sorry that I have not really helped you.

    With best wishes,

    Richard

    Professor Richard A. HarrisonHead of Space Physics DivisionRutherford Appleton LaboratoryChilton, DidcotOxfordshire OX11 0QX, UKTel: (44) 1235 44 6884 Fax: (44) 1235 44 5848

    Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:15:23 +0100

    From: "Harrison, RA (Richard)" Add to AddressBook Add Mobile Alert

    To: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam"

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=484_148423018_15243_1668_2814_0_260173_9615_1442608126&Idx=0&YY=45http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=484_148423018_15243_1668_2814_0_260173_9615_1442608126&Idx=0&YY=45http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=484_148423018_15243_1668_2814_0_260173_9615_1442608126&Idx=0&YY=45
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    3/26

    3

    From: "Peggy Ann Shea and Don Smart" Add toAddress Book Add Mobile Alert

    To: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam" Subject: Re: Dr.EMAD KAYYAMDate: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:41:28 -0600

    Dear Dr. Kayyam,

    I have reviewed the material you sent me regarding the analogy betweenthe eye, the earth and Stonehenge. While I found this to be an interestingconcept, it is not appropriate for the journal Advances in Space Research.I would suggest you consider a journal that deals specifically with strangeand unusual phenomenon. Unfortunately I cannot recommend a specific

    journal name.

    I wish you success in finding the appropriate journal that will publish your work.

    Yours truly,

    (Dr.) M. A. Shea

    Editor-in-Chief, ASR

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=8781_94449681_2173_1703_2359_0_256421_6440_291220587&Idx=11&YY=816http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=8781_94449681_2173_1703_2359_0_256421_6440_291220587&Idx=11&YY=816
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    4/26

    4

    Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:08:36 -0400From: "Farouk El-Baz" Add to Address Book Add

    Mobile AlertTo: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam" Subject: Re: Dr. EMAD KAYYAM - Jordan

    Dear Dr. Emad:

    Thank you for your message and congratulations on getting a patent for your discovery. This in itself is an accomplishment.

    I am a geologist and cannot judge your invention.

    It would be best to give it to an expert who can help.

    With best wishes for continued success,Farouk El-Baz

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=971_29209361_5837_1486_301_0_248055_-1_0&Idx=20&YY=50288&inc=25&orhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=971_29209361_5837_1486_301_0_248055_-1_0&Idx=20&YY=50288&inc=25&orhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=971_29209361_5837_1486_301_0_248055_-1_0&Idx=20&YY=50288&inc=25&orhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=971_29209361_5837_1486_301_0_248055_-1_0&Idx=20&YY=50288&inc=25&orhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=971_29209361_5837_1486_301_0_248055_-1_0&Idx=20&YY=50288&inc=25&or
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    5/26

    5

    Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:30:51 -0400From: "archaeoastronomy journal"

    Add to AddressBook Add Mobile Alert

    Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent

    by gmail.com. Learn moreTo: "Emad Kayyam" Subject: Re: Stonehenge

    Dear Dr. Kayyam,

    We received your brief paper submitted for consideration byArchaeoastronomy. Unfortunately it is not suitable for publication for thefollowing reasons:

    First, it seems to be a modern interpretation of Stonehenge with noindication of how this might have connected with the ideas of the buildersof Stonehenge. Archaeoastronomy is concerned with how astronomicalideas fit in the culture of the creators of Stonehenge, not with howastronomy relates to modern culture.

    Secondly, archaeology is an evidence based discipline but the hypothesisis presented here with no specific evidence to support it. Generalsimilarities between the shape of the spherical earth, the spherical eye, andthe circular structure of Stonehenge are insufficiently specific to supportthis hypothesis.

    Finally, (and this may reflect the previous lack of specifics) the article is toobrief to be considered for our journal.

    I recommend that you read examples of the archaeological literature tobecome familiar with scholarly expectations in that field.

    SincerelyStephen McCluskeyEditor

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7368_0_6219_2402_3085_0_502887_9085_1912571940_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7368_0_6219_2402_3085_0_502887_9085_1912571940_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7368_0_6219_2402_3085_0_502887_9085_1912571940_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7368_0_6219_2402_3085_0_502887_9085_1912571940_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWz
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    6/26

    6

    Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:53:54 -0400To: "Emad \(M.O\) Kayyam" From: "Norman Hammond" Add to Address

    Book Add Mobile AlertSubject: Re: Fwd: kindly to Dr. Norman Hammond

    Dear Dr. Kayyam,

    Thank you for your message.

    Unfortunately we have no funds to support this kind of research.

    Sincerely,

    Norman Hammond

    Professor Norman Hammond, FSA, FBA,Department of Archaeology,Boston University,675 Commonwealth Avenue,Boston MA 02215-1406,USA.(617) 358-1651 (pers/voice mail)

    353-3415 (Department)353-6800 (fax)

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4063_0_1256_1441_3870_0_541014_13633_1737411142_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4063_0_1256_1441_3870_0_541014_13633_1737411142_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4063_0_1256_1441_3870_0_541014_13633_1737411142_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4063_0_1256_1441_3870_0_541014_13633_1737411142_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmW
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    7/26

    7

    Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:40:34 -0500 (EST)From: "Rudy Schild" Add to Address

    Book Add Mobile AlertTo: [email protected]: Earth, Eye, Stonehenge

    Dear Dr. Emad Kayyam,

    Thank you for writing with a new view of a possible relationship betweenastronomical human and Earth physiology. Of course you will find it nearlyimpossible to find collaborations to study such diverse topics together,when there seems to be almost no reason for the three to be inter-related.

    I have two particular reasons to avoid any personal involvement. I My self am working flat out to try to change our civilization's attitudes about black

    holes, and this will be simple compared to the program that you enter upon. Secondly, I am reluctant to undertake correspondence in the mid-East (Mediterranean) since it automatically puts me high on mygovernment lists.

    Because nobody is looking for or expecting a correlation such as youpropose, you will find it difficult to find collaboration or support For further inquiry thus you must fall back upon your convictions to pursue thisapproach further.

    My best wishes to you.

    --Rudy Schild

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9023_0_717_1483_2151_0_542261_4267_1330687345_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzmhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9023_0_717_1483_2151_0_542261_4267_1330687345_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzmhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9023_0_717_1483_2151_0_542261_4267_1330687345_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzmhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9023_0_717_1483_2151_0_542261_4267_1330687345_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzm
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    8/26

  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    9/26

    9

    Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:55:17 UTTo: [email protected]: JSE06-061 DecisionFrom: [email protected] View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert

    Dear Dr. Kayyam,

    I regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript

    Entitled "Similarity relation between the anatomical human eyeball & theEarth ball 'planet' and its role in Stonehenge megalith interpretation for publication in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Please sees the Editor'scomments at the bottom of this e-mail

    We very much appreciate your interest in the Journal of Scientific

    Exploration for the publication of your work

    Best regards,

    Joy Richmond

    Managing Editor

    Allen Press, Inc.

    810 E. 10th St.

    Lawrence, KS 66044

    P: (785) 843-1234, ext. 121

    F: (785) 843-1244

    Editor's Comments:

    Your manuscript was judged not to meet our criteria to an appropriateextent. It is not always feasible to offer detailed substantive reasons whymaterial is not accepted for publication; after all, the onus is on authors toconvince a journal that a particular manuscript falls within its purview andcriteria.

    General criteria for material publishable in the journal include that

    http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=38166&v=SA&A=t&em=jse%40allentrack.net&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoohttp://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=38166&v=SA&A=t&em=jse%40allentrack.net&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoohttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=2336_0_1319_1423_1233_0_352916_2383_2509939603_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVnymWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=2336_0_1319_1423_1233_0_352916_2383_2509939603_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVnymWzhttp://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=38166&v=SA&A=t&em=jse%40allentrack.net&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoo
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    10/26

    10

    "All topics may be considered for the Journal; however, the investigationsmust conform to criteria of academic excellence. . . . Articles must conformto contemporary scholarly standards appropriate for an archival journal."

    "Academic excellence" includes that theories be supported by evidence;that competing theories be discussed; that the evidence result from soundmethodology. Moreover, manuscripts must be written in clear,grammatically and syntactically correct English. We cannot undertake totranslate from other languages or from writings so poorly expressed thatthe meaning is not clear. In addition, the editorial staff asks such questionsas:

    What will readers gain from reading this?

    Are assertions supported by appropriate evidence?

    Is the relevant literature suitably taken into account and cited?Some material, though technically sound, may simply be too technical, or too specialized, for our readership, which covers the broadest range of scientific and scholarly fields. Inevitably, judgments must be made inapplying these criteria. Sometimes reviewers submit advice informally, sothat detailed substantive critiques cannot always be offered.

    More specifically, this manuscript looks to be a part of a much larger project. It tries to cover a much broader range of ideas than is suitable for an article.

  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    11/26

    11

    From: "Gillian Morriss-Kay" Addto Address Book Add Mobile Alert

    To: "'Emad (M.O) Kayyam'" Subject: RE: Anatomical ObservationsDate: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:10:28 -0000

    Dear Dr Kayyam,

    I regret that I am unable to enter into any correspondence that is outsidemy area of professional expertise.

    Yours sincerely,

    GM Morriss-Kay

    Professor GM Morriss-KayEditor-in-Chief, Journal of Anatomy

    Le Gros Clark Building

    Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics

    South Parks Road

    Oxford OX1 3QX

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7346_1788628_159_2099_2924_0_559009_11931_1829886654&Idx=0&YY=8620http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7346_1788628_159_2099_2924_0_559009_11931_1829886654&Idx=0&YY=8620http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7346_1788628_159_2099_2924_0_559009_11931_1829886654&Idx=0&YY=8620http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7346_1788628_159_2099_2924_0_559009_11931_1829886654&Idx=0&YY=8620
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    12/26

    12

    Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:53:16 -0400To: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam" From: "H. Russell Bernard" Add to Address

    Book Add Mobile AlertSubject: your article for FIELD METHODS

    Dear Dr. Kayyam:

    I've received and read your article, "Similarity relation between theanatomical human Eye ball & the planet Earth ball in Stonehenge megalithinterpretation." I appreciate your considering FIELD METHODS as an outletfor your scholarly writing. Your article, however, is inappropriate for FM.The journal focuses on empirical studies of methods for collecting andanalyzing social science data.

    Sincerely,

    H. Russell BernardProfessor of Anthropology, EmeritusUniversity of FloridaEditor, FIELD METHODS

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7811_0_2182_2065_605_0_502892_1497_3218320042_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzmhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7811_0_2182_2065_605_0_502892_1497_3218320042_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzmhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7811_0_2182_2065_605_0_502892_1497_3218320042_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzmhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7811_0_2182_2065_605_0_502892_1497_3218320042_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzm
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    13/26

    13

    Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 07:33:04 -0400From: "Ann Kingsolver" Add to Address

    Book Add Mobile AlertTo: [email protected]: Re: Cover Letter

    Hello Dr. Kayyam,

    Thank you for your inquiry. This topic is not relevant for the Anthropologyof Work Review, which is a journal very specifically focused on theanthropology of work.

    With best regards,

    Ann Kingsolver

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5236_0_2735_1245_1376_0_502893_2506_3663146663_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5236_0_2735_1245_1376_0_502893_2506_3663146663_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5236_0_2735_1245_1376_0_502893_2506_3663146663_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5236_0_2735_1245_1376_0_502893_2506_3663146663_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWz
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    14/26

    14

    Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:49:06 -0700 (PDT)From: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam" View

    Contact Details Add Mobile AlertSubject: RE: questionTo: [email protected]

    Hq-public-inquiries wrote:

    Dear EMAD:

    Thank you for your inquiry to NASA.

    Under Federal regulation, NASA is authorized to accept technicalproposals for evaluation only under one of two conditions: a proposalmust either be (1) submitted in response to a formal competitive

    solicitation; or (2) presented as an unsolicited proposal. The procedure for submitting an unsolicited proposal is described in a NASA guidebooklocated at http://ec.msfc.nasa.gov/hq/library/unSol-Prop.html . The conceptyou describe is not structured as an unsolicited proposal as defined by theguidebook. Therefore, as submitted, it cannot be accepted for review.These rules are primarily intended to protect patent rights and copyrightprivileges of inventors.

    Also, included in the above Web site are the respective NASA Centers andtheir particular technical areas of responsibility under the section entitled,NASA Research areas and addresses for submission. Perhaps you can

    address your questions directly to the respective NASA Center for anexpedited response. After you review that information, should youcontinue to believe that your proposal would be more appropriately alignedwith an area of research associated with a particular NASA Center, pleaseforward a valid unsolicited proposal directly to that Center. You arestrongly encouraged to follow the instructions as outlined in the Guidancefor the Preparations and Submission of Unsolicited Proposals, Web siteso that NASA Center personnel can process and fairly review your proposal.NASA hopes that this information will be helpful to you as you pursue your goals. Again, thank you for your letter and interest in NASA.

    Cordially,

    Public Communications Management Office

    NASA Office of Public Affairs

    http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=40139&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.maihttp://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=40139&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.maihttp://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=40139&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.maihttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=546_0_746_684_3192_0_257951_11323_3963341435_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV31mWzmshttp://ec.msfc.nasa.gov/hq/library/unSol-Prop.htmlhttp://ec.msfc.nasa.gov/hq/library/unSol-Prop.htmlhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=546_0_746_684_3192_0_257951_11323_3963341435_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV31mWzmshttp://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=40139&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.maihttp://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=40139&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mai
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    15/26

    15

    Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT)From: "Angela Close" Add to Address

    Book Add Mobile AlertTo: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam" CC: "Chris Chippindale" Subject: Re: Stonehenge

    Dear Dr. Kayyam,

    I have received your paper on Stonehenge, but must inform you that I amno longer Editor of the Journal of World Prehistory. Dr. C. Chippindale nowholds that position and I am sending a copy of this message to him.

    Since Chippindale himself is an expert on matters concerning Stonehenge,I am sure he will be most intrigued by your paper.

    Thank you for thinking of JWP

    Yours,

    Angela E. Close

    Angela E. Close E-mail: [email protected]

    Department of Anthropology Tel: 206-543-2078

    Box 353100 Fax: 206-543-3285

    University of Washington Web:

    http://faculty.washington.edu/aeclose

    Seattle, WA 98195-3100

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=1317_0_6574_2126_1918_0_502889_3679_1511599162_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=1317_0_6574_2126_1918_0_502889_3679_1511599162_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=1317_0_6574_2126_1918_0_502889_3679_1511599162_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=1317_0_6574_2126_1918_0_502889_3679_1511599162_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWzhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=1317_0_6574_2126_1918_0_502889_3679_1511599162_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV32mWz
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    16/26

    16

    To: [email protected]: Final decision on your article from Phys. Med. Biol. -

    PMB/263621/SPE/182425From: [email protected] Add to Address Book Add Mobile AlertDate: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:15:20 +0100

    Ref: PMB/263621/SPE/182425

    26 October 2007

    Dear Dr Kayyam

    TITLE: Human Eye Solar Earth Analogy as a Stonehenge Code.

    AUTHORS: Dr Emad Kayyam

    Thank you for your submission to Physics in Medicine and Biology.

    However, we do not publish this type of article in any of our journals andso we are unable to consider your article further.

    Thank you for considering Physics in Medicine and Biology.

    Yours sincerely

    Johnathan Keen

    Group Publishing Administrator

    Physics in Medicine and Biology

    Publishing Team

    Johnathan Keen - Group Publishing Administrator

    Simon Harris - Publisher, Jon Ruffle - Publishing Editor

    Alice English - Production Editor

    Contact Details

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Fax: +44 (0) 117 9200677

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=2094_0_159_1702_847_0_537663_1556_2183932085_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzmshttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=2094_0_159_1702_847_0_537663_1556_2183932085_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzmshttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=2094_0_159_1702_847_0_537663_1556_2183932085_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVvxmWzms
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    17/26

    17

    To: [email protected]: AA/2007/8284From: [email protected] Add to Address Book Add Mobile AlertDate: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:58:14 +0200

    16/07/2007

    Dear Dr KAYYAM,

    Thank you very much for having submitted your manuscript entitled: TheUniverse and the human body. To Astronomy and Astrophysics, after consideration by our Editorial Board, I regret to inform you that your manuscript cannot be considered for publication in Astronomy andAstrophysics.

    Indeed, the subject of your article is not covered by A&A and we adviseyou to submit it to another journal where the readership should be moreinvolved in your subject. We unfortunately have to confine our journal topurely astronomical or astrophysical themes. A journal reaching a larger audience might be more suitable.

    Yours sincerely,

    Malcolm Walmsley

    A&A Editor

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=55_0_159_1354_922_0_506101_-1_0_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVzymWzmsYJo_GJP03qouZhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=55_0_159_1354_922_0_506101_-1_0_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVzymWzmsYJo_GJP03qouZhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=55_0_159_1354_922_0_506101_-1_0_oSObkYn4Ur5HQVzymWzmsYJo_GJP03qouZ
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    18/26

    18

    Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:01:09 -0400 (EDT)From: [email protected] Add to Address Book Add Mobile AlertTo: [email protected], [email protected]: Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica - AOS-07-04-0265CC: [email protected]

    13-May-2007

    Dear Dr. EMAD KAYYAM,

    AOS-07-04-0265

    The Artists Eye

    Similarity relation between the anatomical human Eyeball & the planet

    Earth ball in Stonehenge megalith interpretation

    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA receives a large number of reports each year and is only able to publish a small percentage of theseManuscripts, Unfortunately your manuscript, while interesting and wellwritten, did not get a high enough priority in the evaluation process to bepublished.

    We appreciate that you allowed us to review your work and hope you keepActa in mind for your research publications in the future. Thank you for submitting your work to ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA.

    Sincerely Yours,

    Einar Stefansson

    Chief Editor

    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5867_0_159_1233_785_0_483048_-1_0_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV7wmWzmsYt4Yok3gDvNhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5867_0_159_1233_785_0_483048_-1_0_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV7wmWzmsYt4Yok3gDvNhttp://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=5867_0_159_1233_785_0_483048_-1_0_oSObkYn4Ur5HQV7wmWzmsYt4Yok3gDvN
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    19/26

    19

    Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:07:32 +0000

    From: [email protected] Add Mobile Alert

    To: "Emad \\(M.O\\) Kayyam"

    Subject: Re: The Eye ball and the Earth ball: Model for InvertedPlanetarium.

    Mr Kayyam,

    Your article was removed for 2 reasons. The formatting was extremely bad,and it was practically unreadable by 3 of the browsers we have, andsecondly we received many complaints about your previous articles.

    We let these pass, but we are not prepared to undertake the additional workresponding to these complaints takes as the pressures of additional workallow only a certain amount of administration.

    We will be in touch in the coming months about a more appropriateOut let for the products of your thought processes and that this partOf your work and the previous articles might form an early headliningcomponent.

    Sincerely,

    Nigel Holt

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=3344_7366376_2909_2118_922_0_571096_1673_86313700&Idx=0&YY=94839&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Article%20%2d%202##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=3344_7366376_2909_2118_922_0_571096_1673_86313700&Idx=0&YY=94839&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Article%20%2d%202##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=3344_7366376_2909_2118_922_0_571096_1673_86313700&Idx=0&YY=94839&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Article%20%2d%202##
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    20/26

    20

    Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:45:14 -0800 (PST)

    From: "Emad (M.O) Kayyam" View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert

    Subject: The Eye ball and the Earth ball: Model for Inverted Planetarium.

    To: [email protected]

    > Dear Sir> Greeting>> Yesterday I submit my new article titled: The Eye ball and the Earth ball:Model for Inverted Planetarium. Which discuss the parallel organizationalcontext Potential of the Eye ball and the Earth ball and suggest a newmethod and model that may help us to figure out something about thestructural arrangement and direction of our mother planet location andcould yield vital clues to understand something about the image of thecelestial sphere around us since till now nobody can figure out how theuniverse shape around us is look like.

    Your kind care to let me know why I did not find my article in the front pageof our beloved journal PHILICA.

    > Thank you mush,

    > EMAD KAYYAM---------------------------------

    http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=61661&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoo.com%2fym%2fShowLetter%3fMsgId%3d9514%5f3007280%5f2524%5f663%5f957%5f0%5f570687%5f3345%5f1446909889%26Idx%3d1%26YY%3d838%26y5beta%3dyes%26y5beta%3dyes%26inc%3d25%26order%3ddown%26sort%3ddate%26pos%3d0%26view%3da%26head%3db%26box%3dArticle%2520%252d%25202http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=61661&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoo.com%2fym%2fShowLetter%3fMsgId%3d9514%5f3007280%5f2524%5f663%5f957%5f0%5f570687%5f3345%5f1446909889%26Idx%3d1%26YY%3d838%26y5beta%3dyes%26y5beta%3dyes%26inc%3d25%26order%3ddown%26sort%3ddate%26pos%3d0%26view%3da%26head%3db%26box%3dArticle%2520%252d%25202http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=61661&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoo.com%2fym%2fShowLetter%3fMsgId%3d9514%5f3007280%5f2524%5f663%5f957%5f0%5f570687%5f3345%5f1446909889%26Idx%3d1%26YY%3d838%26y5beta%3dyes%26y5beta%3dyes%26inc%3d25%26order%3ddown%26sort%3ddate%26pos%3d0%26view%3da%26head%3db%26box%3dArticle%2520%252d%25202http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9514_3007280_2524_663_957_0_570687_3345_1446909889&Idx=1&YY=838&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Article%20%2d%202##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9514_3007280_2524_663_957_0_570687_3345_1446909889&Idx=1&YY=838&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Article%20%2d%202##http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=61661&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoo.com%2fym%2fShowLetter%3fMsgId%3d9514%5f3007280%5f2524%5f663%5f957%5f0%5f570687%5f3345%5f1446909889%26Idx%3d1%26YY%3d838%26y5beta%3dyes%26y5beta%3dyes%26inc%3d25%26order%3ddown%26sort%3ddate%26pos%3d0%26view%3da%26head%3db%26box%3dArticle%2520%252d%25202http://address.mail.yahoo.com/yab?.rand=61661&v=SA&A=t&em=dremad%5fkayyam%40yahoo.com&.done=http%3a%2f%2fus.f336.mail.yahoo.com%2fym%2fShowLetter%3fMsgId%3d9514%5f3007280%5f2524%5f663%5f957%5f0%5f570687%5f3345%5f1446909889%26Idx%3d1%26YY%3d838%26y5beta%3dyes%26y5beta%3dyes%26inc%3d25%26order%3ddown%26sort%3ddate%26pos%3d0%26view%3da%26head%3db%26box%3dArticle%2520%252d%25202
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    21/26

    21

    From nei2020 (NIH/NEI) To [email protected],

    Date Oct 12, 2007 9:45 PMSubject RE: Question from the NEI website 2007-10-11 #04Mailed-by nei.nih.gov

    Thank you for your inquiry. The National Eye Institute (NEI) conducts andsupports research that leads to sight-saving treatments and plays a keyrole in reducing visual impairment and blindness. The NEI is part of theNational Institutes of Health (NIH), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Thank you for sharing your information. Unfortunately, the NEI is not ableto offer the service you requested.

    Office of Communication, Health Education, and Public Liaison

    National Eye InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesda, Maryland 20892-2510USAWebsite: www.nei.nih.govE-mail: [email protected]

  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    22/26

    22

    From: [email protected] Date: 27 Aug 2007 15:01:41 -0000Subject: Submission to Applied OntologyTo: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]

    Thank you for your submission to Applied Ontology entitled, "Similarityrelation between the anatomical human Eye ball & the planet Earth ballin Stonehenge megalith interpretation."

    Your paper makes a number of extremely interesting observations.Unfortunately, the paper is not within the scope of our journal. Thecontent of the paper does not specifically address the ontologicalissues that are at the core of the manuscripts that we publish.

    Thank you for thinking of Applied Ontology. I hope that you are

    successful in having your paper published in another journal where thetheme is more appropriate.

    Sincerely,

    Mark MusenCo-Editor in Chief

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[email protected]
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    23/26

    23

    From: "Journal of Archaeological Science" Add Mobile Alert

    To: [email protected]

    Subject: Decision on your Manuscript JASC08-57

    Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:40:33 -0000

    Ref: JASC08-57Title: The Eye ball and the Earth ball: Model for Inverted Planetarium.Authors: EMAD KAYYAM, M.B.B.Ch

    Dear Doctor KAYYAM,

    Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of ArchaeologicalScience. Unfortunately I will not be sending out for peer review this time.Because of the length of the refereeing process and the limited number of good referees, we must make an initial screening before beginning therefereeing process.

    I am, therefore, rejecting your manuscript on this basis in order to allowyou to seek another journal without too much delay.We thank you for your interest in the Journal and are sorry that we will notbe considering this paper further.

    Yours sincerely,

    John Grattan, Editor Journal of Archaeological ScienceEmail: [email protected]://ees.elsevier.com/yjasc

    I am afraid the focus of your work does not fall within the remit of theJournal of Archaeological Science.

    I suggest you try the fourteen Times

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4289_10056591_19102_1812_978_0_572800_-1_0&Idx=0&YY=30454&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4289_10056591_19102_1812_978_0_572800_-1_0&Idx=0&YY=30454&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4289_10056591_19102_1812_978_0_572800_-1_0&Idx=0&YY=30454&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4289_10056591_19102_1812_978_0_572800_-1_0&Idx=0&YY=30454&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=4289_10056591_19102_1812_978_0_572800_-1_0&Idx=0&YY=30454&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox##
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    24/26

    24

    To: [email protected]

    Subject: AJ Manuscript The Astronomical Journal -AJ/278272/THE/182425

    From: [email protected] Add Mobile Alert

    Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:11:17 +0100

    Ref: AJ/278272/THE/182425

    Dear Dr Kayyam,

    Thank you for sending your paper to be considered for publication in TheAstronomical Journal.

    Manuscript #: 278272Title: Human Eye Solar Earth Analogy as a Stonehenge CodeAuthors: Dr EMAD KAYYAM

    The Astronomical Journal only publishes papers based on the gathering,reporting and analysis of observational data and not articles of atheoretical nature. Consequently, we are unable to consider your paper for publication.

    Regards,John (Jay) S. Gallagher, IIIThe Astronomical Journal

    Editor-in-Chief

    Contact DetailsE-mail: [email protected]/Fax: +1 608 265 6005

    http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7048_16335987_1313_1895_826_0_588380_1460_872150556&Idx=0&YY=87300&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=IOP%20%2d%20Journals##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7048_16335987_1313_1895_826_0_588380_1460_872150556&Idx=0&YY=87300&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=IOP%20%2d%20Journals##http://us.f336.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=7048_16335987_1313_1895_826_0_588380_1460_872150556&Idx=0&YY=87300&y5beta=yes&y5beta=yes&inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b&box=IOP%20%2d%20Journals##
  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    25/26

    25

    Re: Travel through Time by Riding the Sound

    Saturday, April 4, 2009 5:11 PMFrom:"Farouk El-Baz"

    To:"Emad (M.O) Kayyam"

    Dear Dr. Emad:

    Many thanks for your message.

    You really need to contact people in theoretical physics.This is a field that is so far removed from mine, I do notknow its experts and where they would be.

    It is best to consult the Internet for institutions and/or individuals in your field of interest. Good luck.

    Farouk El-Baz

  • 8/14/2019 Archive of Scientists Opinions[1].Doc

    26/26

    Re: Travel through Time by Riding theSoundMonday, April 6, 2009 9:58 PMFrom:"Rudy Schild" To:[email protected]

    Dear Emad Kayyam,

    Your report, "Travel through Time by Riding the Sound" presents achallenge to me, because there is nothing really wrong with it that I cansee, but it does not seem right either. I mean, we now are beginning tounderstand that time travel is probably an act of consciousness, perhapsamplified by some machine. And since perception of sound is also aconscious activity, I cannot say that the sound sensory system is notrelated to the conscious activity related to time travel. However, your reportso far does not make the case that nature has produced a particular mechanism for connecting the two - time travel and soundperception.

    The good news is that there is nothing technically wrong with theastronomical facts you describe, and your understanding of trends in

    modern astronomy is quite good. In particular, I liked your treatment of thedominant theory of cold dark matter, wherein you note in plain languagewhat the theory proposes, and the fact that there are problems withpredictions of the theory. So I consider the astronomical basis of your report to be sound.

    But I do not know of any interdisciplinary program that would be interestedin such an approach, since it is so far from accepted views. So I do notknow to whom or how I could recommend you.

    Perhaps it is sufficient for me to just send you the above statement,

    because ultimately you yourself will have to make this an acceptableapproach and viewpoint. I am favorably impressed by your research andexposition, but I simply don't know what to do with the information.

    My best wishes for your success.

    --Rudy Schild