17
ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

ARDS: how are we doing?

Martin Hughes

September 2010

Page 2: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

MAIN ARTICLEAcute respiratory distress syndrome: an audit ofincidence and outcome in Scottish intensive care

unitsM. Hughes,1 F. N. MacKirdy,2 J. Ross,2 J. Norrie3 and I. S. Grant4 on behalf of the

Scottish Intensive Care Society1 Intensive Care Unit, Royal Infirmary, Castle St, Glasgow, UK

2 Scottish Intensive Care Society Audit Group, Anaesthetic Department, Victoria Infirmary, Langside Avenue, Glasgow,UK

3 Robertson Centre For Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK

4 Consultant, Intensive Care Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, UK

Page 3: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Methods

• Ward Watcher computer in each of 23 ICUs

• Midnight entry of PaO2/FiO2 (nursing staff)

• Additional data• Chest x-ray enquiry• Alternative diagnoses excluded• Diagnosis based on American European

consensus• Underlying diagnosis

Page 4: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Methods 2

• Daily data collection

• PaO2/FiO2

• Indices of organ dysfunction

• Ventilation modes and parameters

• Infection and antibiotics

• Specific therapies e.g. NO, prone position, steroids

• Feeding, fluid use and fluid balance

Page 5: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Incidence

• 8.1% of ICU admissions

• 26.1% of occupied bed days

• 16.5/100,000/year

Page 6: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Results

• ICU mortality• SMR• (Hospital mortality• APACHE II• Mean age• LOS mean • LOS median

19.3% 53.1% (43% - 58.2%)

0.99 1.34

28.5% 60.9%)

18.3 22.3 (21.5 - 23.7)

58.2 56.8 (55.1 - 58.5)

4.3 14.56

1.83 11

Whole population ARDS (n=375)

Page 7: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Ventilatory parameters day 1

• Murray 2.41/2.56

• PaO2/FiO2 118mmHg

• Mean Peak Paw 31.0 cmH2O

• Mean PEEP 7.5 cmH2O

• Mean TV 642ml (9.2ml per kg)

Page 8: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Univariate analysis - ICU death

• Age: Odds Ratio (OR) 1.15 (1.08, 1.23) for each 5 year increase

• Admission source: ICU/HDU/ward doubled OR compared with theatre

• Days in hospital before ICU: OR 1.04 (1.01, 1.07) for each day

Page 9: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Univariate analysis - ICU death

• APACHE II: OR 1.09 (1.05, 1.12) for each 1 unit increase

• SAPS II: OR 1.06 (1.04, 1.08) for each 1 unit increase

• ICU stay strongly negatively predictive: stay < 5 days 89% mortality

Page 10: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Univariate analysis - ICU death: Admission variables

• SBP < 90mmHg: OR 2.53 (1.55, 4.14)

• Cardiac dysrythmia: OR 2.42 (1.20, 4.90)

• ARF: OR 3.93 (2.24, 6.91)

• Immunosuppression: OR 3.24 (1.17, 8.99)

Page 11: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Organ failures

• Median max 2

• Survivors median max 2 (IQR 1-3)

• Non Survivors median max 3 (IQR 2-4)

• At death: 21% 1 OF, 28% 2 OF, 29% 3 OF, 17 %4 OF, 6% 5 OF.

Page 12: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Multivariate analysis: significant factors

• Age: 5 years OR 1.13 (1.04, 1.23)

• SAPS II: 1 unit OR 1.05 (1.03, 1.07)

• SBP < 90: OR 2.51 (1.38, 4.54)

• Days in ICU: 1 day OR 0.95 (0.93, 0.97)

• Days in hospital before ICU: 1 day OR 1.05 (1.01, 1.08)

Page 13: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Significant negatives

• Direct or indirect lung injury

• GCS 3 - 5

• Very severe cardiac illness

• Severe respiratory disease

• Hepatic encephalopathy, cirrhosis

• Admission time

• HR > 150, GI bleed

Page 14: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Why the poor mortality?

• Other studies were series in single centres

• Note France 32% vs 60%

• Small amount of trauma

• Ventilatory or other management

• Severity of illness

Page 15: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

What should we do?

• Repeat some of the study: prospective observational cohort study

• Mortality• Underlying diagnosis and severity• Organ dysfunction and support• Ward watcher data• Ventilatory parameters• Fluid balance

Page 16: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Problems

• Funding

• Additional work in each unit: ventilation, fluids, diagnosis, organ dysfunction

• Data validation

Page 17: ARDS: how are we doing? Martin Hughes September 2010

Questions

• Would it be useful?

• Is it worth the additional work?

• Is there a way to simplify it?

• Is there anything else which would improve it?