13
Are drug use and situational characteristics at last sex associated with sexual outcomes? Initial findings from a national survey of MSM in England G.J. Melendez-Torres 1 , Ford Hickson 2 , David Reid 2 , Peter Weatherburn 2 , Chris Bonell 3 1 Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford; 2 Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 3 Department of Childhood, Families and Health, University College London

Are drug use and situational characteristics at last sex associated with sexual outcomes? Initial findings from a national survey of MSM in England G.J

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Are drug use and situational characteristics at last sex associated with sexual outcomes?

Initial findings from a national survey of MSM in England

G.J. Melendez-Torres1, Ford Hickson2, David Reid2, Peter Weatherburn2, Chris Bonell31Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford; 2Sigma Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine;3Department of Childhood, Families and Health, University College London

A brief overview

• What encounter-level analyses tell us and why we need them now

• Methods and analyses from the Sigma Panel 2011

• Key findings

A brief overview

• What encounter-level analyses tell us and why we need them now

• Methods and analyses from the Sigma Panel 2011

• Key findings

Research tells us that people who use drugs are more likely to engage in risky sex…

• …but how helpful is this finding when drug use is recreational rather than addictive?

• …and what are we missing about context of drug use?

• …and why is sexual risk the only thing we are interested in?

• …and what do we know about encounter-level risk in MSM living in England?

A brief overview

• What encounter-level analyses tell us and why we need them now

• Methods and analyses from the Sigma Panel 2011

• Key findings

The Sigma Panel 2011

• England-wide monthly survey of MSM conducted online in 2011

• Last sexual encounter asked in five months (months 2, 5, 7, 10, 13)

• Last sexual encounter with a new partner asked in two months (months 1 and 3)

Three analyses on three different groups of encounters• 1,879 MSM reported 2,913 encounters with

new male partners in months 1 and 3

• 321 MSM reported 438 multipartner encounters with other men in months 7, 10 and 13

• 2,142 MSM reported 6,742 dyadic encounters with other men in months 2, 5, 7, 10 and 13

• We examined unprotected anal intercourse, pleasure and control over sexual behaviour as outcomes

A brief overview

• What encounter-level analyses tell us and why we need them now

• Methods and analyses from the Sigma Panel 2011

• Key findings

Drug and alcohol use and venue of sex interact in encounters with new partners

Private venue SOPV Cruising0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

19%

9%

22%25% 25% 23%

No drug and alcohol use Any drug or alcohol use

Pre

dic

ted

pro

bab

ilit

y o

f U

AI

Any drug or alcohol use and specific drug use are associated with increased UAI in multipartner encounters

Drugs or al-cohol

Crystal meth Viagra0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

29%36%

33%

41%

63%

51%

Not used Used

Pre

dic

ted

pro

bab

ilit

y o

f U

AI

Poppers, Viagra, crystal meth and GHB are each associated with UAI in dyadic encounters

Poppers Viagra Crystal meth

GHB0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

14% 14% 14% 14%

28%34% 34%

28%

Not used Used

Pre

dic

ted

pro

bab

ilit

y o

f U

AI

Pleasure and control

• Any drug or alcohol use was associated with increased pleasure in new partner encounters and all dyadic encounters, but not in multipartner encounters

• Drug and alcohol use was not associated with decreased control over sexual behaviour—with the exception of crystal methamphetamine in multipartner encounters

What do you think?

• What do you think accounts for the difference within SOPVs in UAI probability?

• What do you think about the lack of significant findings around control and drug use?

• Do these findings match up with your experience?