6
Kidney International, Vol. 61 (2002), pp. 876–881 Arginase in glomerulonephritis SIMON N. WADDINGTON Gene Therapy Group, Section of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of Science Technology and Medicine, London, England, United Kingdom Arginase in glomerulonephritis. l-Arginine is converted to ni- examined. There appeared to be an increase in ornithine tric oxide and citrulline by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase decarboxylase at six hours and a delayed increase in (NOS). Its in vivo inhibition has led to the revelation of a ornithine aminotransferase, between days 3 and 21 [3]. multitude of diverse, often conflicting functions in the inflam- After injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in rats, NOS matory melee. l-Arginine is also converted to ornithine and II and Arginase I mRNA were co-induced within 12 urea by the enzyme arginase as a part of the hepatic urea cycle. However, a more holistic interpretation of the two pathways hours [4]. In contrast, in a model of sepsis, increased and the associated metabolism (summarized in Fig. 1) has led expression of NOS II was associated with a loss of Argi- to its reassessment as a pathologically significant enzyme. This nase II expression in lung tissue [5]. is reflected by the continued increase over the past five years of the number of publications discussing both nitric oxide and Arginine-metabolizing pathways reciprocally inhibit arginase. The strong association between inflammation and each other in vitro high arginase and NOS activity is epitomized by immune com- plex-induced glomerulonephritis and other glomerulonephriti- These pathways have been shown to inhibit each other des. Arginase is encoded by two recently discovered genes at multiple levels, including substrate competition and (Arginase I and Arginase II). There is now substantial evidence protein and mRNA stability and expression. for an interaction between both arginase isoforms and all three NOS isoforms in pathological situations. This review considers NOS inhibits arginase. Glomeruli were isolated from the relationship between Arginases I and II and the inflamma- normal rats and nephritic rats four days after the induc- tion-associated isoform of NOS called NOS II. In particular, tion of accelerated nephrotoxic nephritis. Addition of the it consolidates the current understanding of arginase and asso- NOS inhibitor N G -monomethyl-l-arginine (L-NMMA) ciated metabolic pathways, and highlights some of the issues substantially increased metabolism of arginine by argi- that are often overlooked in such studies. nase over the 48-hour period of culture [6]. Limitation of l-arginine flux through the arginase pathway by NOS WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT ARGINASE AND ITS is likely the result of two independent mechanisms. The ASSOCIATED METABOLISM? first is competition for substrate, discussed later. The Enzymes associated with arginine metabolism are second is inhibition of arginase by N -hydroxy-l-argi- up-regulated at inflammatory sites nine, an intermediate in the conversion of arginine to For example, NOS II and Arginase I have been shown NO. This has been shown to be secreted into the culture to be up-regulated in glomeruli after induction of heter- supernatant of LPS-stimulated rabbit alveolar macro- ologous nephrotoxic nephritis [1]. A similar increase in phages and has been shown to increase from 4 to 16 arginase activity and induction of NOS II was observed mol/L in the plasma of LPS-treated rats [7]. In 1994 in in situ glomerulonephritis [2], and accelerated nephro- Boucher and colleagues demonstrated potent inhibition toxic nephritis [3]. These results were confirmed by Ket- of macrophage arginase by N -hydroxy-l-arginine [8]. teler et al, who studied arginine metabolism in isolated This compound also inhibited arginase activity in ne- glomeruli from rats with anti-thymocyte serum-induced phritic glomeruli and in stimulated mesangial cells [6]. glomerulonephritis. At day 1, there was a transient maxi- Another possible mechanism by which NOS activity mum of nitrite production, whereas arginase activity was might affect arginase activity is through the accumulation sustained until day 3 of the disease. Ornithine decarbox- of nitrite, a breakdown product of NO. Hraba ´ k, Bajor and ylase and ornithine aminotransferase, enzymes leading Temesi demonstrated significant inhibition of inducible to polyamine and proline production, respectively, were nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in macrophage lysates, but not whole cells, by nitrite, with a K m of 4.9 mmol/L [9]. A third product of NOS metabolism, citrulline, has Key words: arginase, nitric oxide, arginine, glomerulonephritis, kidney, inflammation. been shown to inhibit arginase activity. Shearer and co- workers showed that inhibition of arginase activity dur- 2002 by the International Society of Nephrology 876

Arginase in glomerulonephritis

  • Upload
    simon-n

  • View
    220

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Arginase in glomerulonephritis

Kidney International, Vol. 61 (2002), pp. 876–881

Arginase in glomerulonephritis

SIMON N. WADDINGTON

Gene Therapy Group, Section of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College School of ScienceTechnology and Medicine, London, England, United Kingdom

Arginase in glomerulonephritis. l-Arginine is converted to ni- examined. There appeared to be an increase in ornithinetric oxide and citrulline by the enzyme nitric oxide synthase decarboxylase at six hours and a delayed increase in(NOS). Its in vivo inhibition has led to the revelation of a ornithine aminotransferase, between days 3 and 21 [3].multitude of diverse, often conflicting functions in the inflam-

After injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in rats, NOSmatory melee. l-Arginine is also converted to ornithine andII and Arginase I mRNA were co-induced within 12urea by the enzyme arginase as a part of the hepatic urea cycle.

However, a more holistic interpretation of the two pathways hours [4]. In contrast, in a model of sepsis, increasedand the associated metabolism (summarized in Fig. 1) has led expression of NOS II was associated with a loss of Argi-to its reassessment as a pathologically significant enzyme. This nase II expression in lung tissue [5].is reflected by the continued increase over the past five yearsof the number of publications discussing both nitric oxide and

Arginine-metabolizing pathways reciprocally inhibitarginase. The strong association between inflammation andeach other in vitrohigh arginase and NOS activity is epitomized by immune com-

plex-induced glomerulonephritis and other glomerulonephriti- These pathways have been shown to inhibit each otherdes. Arginase is encoded by two recently discovered genes

at multiple levels, including substrate competition and(Arginase I and Arginase II). There is now substantial evidenceprotein and mRNA stability and expression.for an interaction between both arginase isoforms and all three

NOS isoforms in pathological situations. This review considers NOS inhibits arginase. Glomeruli were isolated fromthe relationship between Arginases I and II and the inflamma- normal rats and nephritic rats four days after the induc-tion-associated isoform of NOS called NOS II. In particular, tion of accelerated nephrotoxic nephritis. Addition of theit consolidates the current understanding of arginase and asso-

NOS inhibitor NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (L-NMMA)ciated metabolic pathways, and highlights some of the issuessubstantially increased metabolism of arginine by argi-that are often overlooked in such studies.nase over the 48-hour period of culture [6]. Limitationof l-arginine flux through the arginase pathway by NOS

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT ARGINASE AND ITSis likely the result of two independent mechanisms. The

ASSOCIATED METABOLISM?first is competition for substrate, discussed later. The

Enzymes associated with arginine metabolism are second is inhibition of arginase by N�-hydroxy-l-argi-up-regulated at inflammatory sites nine, an intermediate in the conversion of arginine to

For example, NOS II and Arginase I have been shown NO. This has been shown to be secreted into the cultureto be up-regulated in glomeruli after induction of heter- supernatant of LPS-stimulated rabbit alveolar macro-ologous nephrotoxic nephritis [1]. A similar increase in phages and has been shown to increase from 4 to 16arginase activity and induction of NOS II was observed �mol/L in the plasma of LPS-treated rats [7]. In 1994in in situ glomerulonephritis [2], and accelerated nephro- Boucher and colleagues demonstrated potent inhibitiontoxic nephritis [3]. These results were confirmed by Ket- of macrophage arginase by N�-hydroxy-l-arginine [8].teler et al, who studied arginine metabolism in isolated This compound also inhibited arginase activity in ne-glomeruli from rats with anti-thymocyte serum-induced phritic glomeruli and in stimulated mesangial cells [6].glomerulonephritis. At day 1, there was a transient maxi- Another possible mechanism by which NOS activitymum of nitrite production, whereas arginase activity was might affect arginase activity is through the accumulationsustained until day 3 of the disease. Ornithine decarbox- of nitrite, a breakdown product of NO. Hrabak, Bajor andylase and ornithine aminotransferase, enzymes leading Temesi demonstrated significant inhibition of inducibleto polyamine and proline production, respectively, were nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in macrophage lysates, but

not whole cells, by nitrite, with a Km of 4.9 mmol/L [9].A third product of NOS metabolism, citrulline, hasKey words: arginase, nitric oxide, arginine, glomerulonephritis, kidney,

inflammation. been shown to inhibit arginase activity. Shearer and co-workers showed that inhibition of arginase activity dur- 2002 by the International Society of Nephrology

876

Page 2: Arginase in glomerulonephritis

Waddington: Arginase in glomerulonephritis 877

Fig. 1. Arginine and associated metabolicpathways. (1) argininosuccinate lyase; (2) argi-nine transporters; (3) arginine decarboxylase;(4) l-arginine:glycine amidinotransferase; (5)arginine-tRNA synthetase; (6) arginase; (7)nitric oxide synthase; (8) ornithine decarbox-ylase; (9) ornithine aminotransferase; (10) or-nithine transcarbamylase.

ing increased iNOS activity was unlikely to be due to lower NO production [20]. Macrophages transfectedwith Arginase promoted growth of breast tumor cells insubstrate competition. However, they showed that LPS

increased intracellular citrulline concentrations above co-culture systems. This effect was down-regulated bythe arginase inhibitor l-norvaline [21]. In contrast, Argi-100 �mol/L, a concentration found to significantly inhibit

arginase activity in macrophage lysates [10]. nase I transfection of RAW 264.7 macrophages increasedthe efferent pathways but did not affect NO productionArginase inhibits NOS. Evidence that arginase could

inhibit the cytotoxic effects of macrophages via NO was [22]. There is also some in vivo evidence for inhibitionof NO production by arginase. For example, diabeticfirst provided by Hibbs, Vavrin and Taintor [11]. A simi-

lar effect was seen in glomerular cultures. NO is gener- tissue in the corpus cavernosum had reduced ability toconvert l-arginine to l-citrulline. This was reversed byated by nephritic glomeruli isolated 24 hours after induc-

tion of accelerated nephrotoxic nephritis; the addition addition of the arginase inhibitor 2(S)-amino-6-boron-hexanoic acid (ABH) [23]. In a model of experimentalof arginase to these cultures completely abrogated its

production [12]. trypanosomiasis, macrophages from infected mice haveincreased arginase activity. Addition of arginase inhibi-The Km of arginase for l-arginine is reported to be

around 7 to 18 mmol/L [13], whereas that of iNOS is tors restored trypanosome killing in vitro. Injection ofarginine into the peritoneal cavity of infected mice in-3 to 9 �mol/L and 130 �mol/L for purified and intact

macrophage enzyme activity, respectively [14–16]. The creased NO production and parasite killing, an effectreversed by addition of L-NMMA [24].concentration of arginine in rat plasma is around 250

�mol/L, and therefore, ornithine production by arginase An additional mechanism by which arginase activityinhibits NO production is through urea generation. NOwill be affected by variations around this level, whereas

the arginine concentration should, in theory, drop con- production in RAW 264.7 macrophages was found to beinhibited by 10 mmol/L urea, a concentration similar tosiderably before NO production is affected [17]. Modo-

lell and colleagues provided evidence supporting this that found in uremic humans [25].Cross-inhibition of other pathways. Several other mech-statement [18]. Mouse bone marrow-derived macro-

phages were stimulated with interleukin-4 (IL-4) for 24 anisms of cross-inhibition have been described. NO hasbeen shown to inhibit ornithine decarboxylase in thehours, after which LPS was added and the culture contin-

ued for a further 24 hours. Cells cultured in medium MCT kidney tubule cell line [26] and in vascular smoothmuscle cells [27]. Inactivation of ornithine decarboxylasecontaining 400 �mol/L arginine had large amounts of

arginase but did not generate NO in response to LPS, in has been shown to occur by specific S-nitrosylation ofthe enzyme [28].contrast to high NO output in 2000 �mol/L. The authors

concluded that arginase was depriving NOS of its sub- Agmatine has been shown to attenuate polyamine syn-thesis by inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase and alsostrate [18]. Corroborative observations were made by

Chang, Liao and Kuo, who examined these enzyme inter- by suppression of the putrescine transporter. Agmatinealdehyde, a metabolite of agmatine, has been shown toactions in J774A.1 mouse macrophages [19]. Cells were

cultured for 12 hours in different concentrations of l-argi- be an inhibitor of iNOS in vitro and in vivo. It is likelythat these effects are responsible for the inhibition ofnine. The arginase inhibitor l-norvaline increased NO

production by 55% and 28% at 0.05 mmol/L and 0.1 cell proliferation and improvement in renal function inthymocyte-1 (Thy-1) glomerulonephritis [29].mmol/L l-arginine, respectively. Outside this range of

arginine concentrations, l-norvaline had no effect. Conversely, polyamines have been shown to inhibitNO production. Szabo and colleagues studied the affectRecently, elegant experiments have been performed

using gene delivery technology. Endothelial cells trans- of polyamines and polyamine derivatives on NO produc-tion in LPS-stimulated J774.2 macrophages finding that,fected with Arginase I or Arginase II had significantly

Page 3: Arginase in glomerulonephritis

Waddington: Arginase in glomerulonephritis878

in order of decreasing potency, spermine, spermidine, Arginine-associated enzymes undergotemporal regulationputrescine and cadaverine inhibited nitrite production

in culture. The inhibitory action of polyamines on iNOS Albina and colleagues first demonstrated temporalappeared to depend on the presence of spermine oxidase variation in the activity of NOS II and arginase in a rat[30]. Hrabak and colleagues examined the effect of vari- wound model of implanted polyvinyl sponges. Over theous inhibitors on iNOS activity in rat macrophage lysates first 12 hours, NOS activity prevailed. From 12 hours to[15]. Putrescine inhibited iNOS activity with a Ki of 0.7 three days, the NOS activity rapidly decreased and themmol/L; l-ornithine was also a weak inhibitor. Blachier, arginine concentration rose. From three to ten days, the

arginine concentration fell slowly as wound fluid arginaseMignon and Soubrane analyzed iNOS activity in homog-increased. Disappearance of NOS activity by three daysenates of livers from rats given LPS [31]. NO productioncould not be explained by a dearth of arginine, as culturewas significantly inhibited by spermine at 150 �mol/Lof sponges in high-arginine medium did not elicit nitriteand 500 �mol/L, but by putrescine and spermidine onlyor citrulline synthesis [39, 40].at the higher concentration. Sooranna and Das showed

Cook and co-workers reported a similar pattern ofthat putrescine significantly inhibited nitrite productionenzyme activity [41]. Glomeruli were isolated from theby cultures of the choriocarcinoma cell line BeWo [32].kidneys of rats with acute in situ glomerulonephritis.NOS II activity was induced and arginase activity wasArginase activity can modulate efferent pathwaysincreased in nephritic glomeruli at days 1, 4 and 7, com-Many studies have provided circumstantial evidencepared to normal glomeruli. Whereas the greatest NOSthat arginase activity may be rate-limiting for the produc-activity was at 24 hours, arginase activity peaked at fourtion of proline and polyamines. In a physiological con-days; the activity of both fell rapidly from four to seventext, up-regulation of Arginase II was found to coincidedays. These results were confirmed by Ketteler et al,

with development of connective tissue (rich in proline)who studied arginine metabolism in isolated glomeruli

in Xenopus laevis [33]. In the lactating mammary gland, from rats with anti-thymocyte serum-induced glomerulo-a concerted increase in arginase, ornithine aminotrans- nephritis [3]. At day 1, there was a transient maximumferase and ornithine decarboxylase was consistent with of nitrite production, whereas arginase activity was sus-the increased production of proline and polyamines tained until day 3 of the disease. Ornithine decarboxylase[34, 35]. A pathological up-regulation of these three and ornithine aminotransferase, enzymes leading toenzymes also was observed in anti-thymocyte serum- polyamine and proline production, respectively, wereinduced glomerulonephritis [3]. examined. There appeared to be an increase in ornithine

Harder evidence has been provided by in vitro studies. decarboxylase at six hours and a delayed increase inTransfecting RAW cells with Arginase I increased polya- ornithine aminotransferase between days 3 and 21.mine synthesis [22] (with no effect on NO). Transfecting

There is an underlying pattern to expression of theseendothelial cells with Arginase I and Arginase II in-enzyme systemscreased proline and polyamine synthesis and decreased

The prevailing view is that NOS II and arginase char-NO production [20]. In a similar study, transfecting vas-acterize, and are inherent to, distinct phases of the in-cular smooth muscle cells with Arginase I or treatingflammatory process. Early flux of arginine through NOSthem with IL-4 resulted in increased urea and polyamineII is associated with cytotoxicity, promotion of apoptosisproduction and cellular proliferation [27]. The trans-[42] and nitrosylation of structural components includingforming growth factor-� (TGF-�)–induced increase inbasement membrane. In the aforementioned studies onputrescine and l-proline generation by vascular smoothimplanted sponge models, the authors proposed thatmuscle cells were profoundly inhibited by the arginaseNOS activity, probably from neutrophils, would contrib-inhibitor HOArg [36]. Buga and colleagues demon-ute to microbiostasis and vasodilation in the early wound

strated that inhibition of arginase by HOArg retarded[39, 40].

Caco-2 tumor cell proliferation. Since this effect was In contrast, the delayed flux of arginine through argi-reversed by the addition of ornithine, putrescine, spermi- nase is linked to cell proliferation via polyamine synthe-dine or spermine, arginase appeared to be required by sis [27, 43], collagen synthesis [36, 44] and moderationthese cells to synthesize polyamines for optimal cell of apoptosis [45]. For example, TGF-� increases fibrosisgrowth [37]. Durante et al demonstrated that the polar and wound repair as well as orchestrates the up-regula-phospholipid lysophosphatidylcholine increases arginase tion of a whole armature of arginine metabolism includ-activity, arginine uptake and putrescine production of ing arginase, ornithine aminotransferase and collagensmooth muscle. The arginase inhibitor HOArg was [36]. In contrast, TGF-� down-regulates iNOS inductionshown to strongly inhibit putrescine production in cells in rat renal mesangial cells [46] as well as many other

cell types.[38].

Page 4: Arginase in glomerulonephritis

Waddington: Arginase in glomerulonephritis 879

Recently, it has been suggested that NOS II and argi- CAVEATSnase activity are intrinsic to the T-helper 1 and 2 cell There are several issues that often have been omitted(Th1 and Th2) immune responses, respectively. As the from discussion in studies on arginine metabolism, espe-Th1/Th2 dichotomy of murine CD4� T cells became cially in in vivo models.more widely accepted, interest in regulation of arginine

Arginase activity may be increased systemicallymetabolism by cytokines secreted by these subsets in-creased. Th1 cells produce interferon-� (IFN-�), whereas There are three separate points to consider. The firstTh2 cells generate IL-4 and IL-10. Following evidence is that local inflammation may lead to increased arginasethat IL-4 and IL-10 strongly suppressed the induction of activity elsewhere. For example, examination of theiNOS [47, 48], Modolell and Corraliza demonstrated spleens of mice 12 to 48 hours following surgical traumatheir effect on arginase activity in cell lysates of bone revealed increased Arginase I mRNA and protein ex-

pression and arginase activity with no effect on Arginasemarrow-derived murine macrophages [18, 49]. They de-II or NOS II mRNA [52]. The same group also observedmonstrated an increase in cellular arginase content whenan increase in renal arginase activity [53].macrophages were cultured with IL-4 and IL-10. These

The second point pertains to the effect of arginase onresults lent credibility to the hypothesis that Th2 cyto-immune function at sites distal to the site of inflamma-kines were not simply reducing macrophage activationtion. There is conflicting evidence suggesting that argi-but inducing an alternative phenotype. In subsequentnase can both inhibit [54] and promote [55] lymphocytestudies, macrophages were cultured with Th1 or Th2 cellproliferation. Hacker-Shahin and Droge injected spleenclones, or with in vitro polarized Th1 or Th2 cells. Bothcells from one strain of mouse into the peritoneal cavitysystems showed the same pattern; Th1 and Th2 cellsof another [56]. Spleen cells were isolated from theseexclusively induced iNOS and arginase, respectively. Ar-responder mice and tested for their immunological re-ginase was induced to a far greater extent than with Th2sponse to spleen cells of the donor strain (mixed leuko-cytokines alone, and supernatant from Th2 cells alsocyte reaction). Both putrescine and ornithine augmentedinduced arginase. Antibodies against IL-4 and IL-10 sub-the immunogenicity of the cells to the same extent.stantially abrogated the stimulatory effect of the super-Therefore, independently of the local inflammation, thenatant on arginase activity [50]. Recently, it has beensystemic immune response may be subject to regulationshown that this phenotypic dichotomy also extends toby arginine concentrations. This point should be consid-murine macrophages independently of the effect ofered when systemically administering compounds thatT- or B-lymphocytes. C57Bl/6 mice and BALB/c micemodulate activity of arginine-associated enzymes.are prototypical Th1 and Th2 strains, respectively; mac-

This leads to the third point, that the sum of systemicrophages from C57Bl/6 NUDE or SCID mice and

activity of arginase and other arginine-associated en-BALB/c NUDE or SCID mice demonstrated their re-

zymes will influence plasma amino acid levels. For exam-spective Th1 and Th2 phenotypes even in the absence ple, one day after induction of accelerated nephrotoxicof T or B lymphocytes [51]. nephritis, plasma arginine levels were significantly re-

We have observed similar characteristics in isolated duced compared to normal rats [12]. These concentra-glomeruli and mesangial cells. Four days after induction tions are likely to affect the concentrations at the in-of accelerated nephrotoxic nephritis, addition of IL-4 flammatory site as well as in distal organs.caused a large increase in arginase activity in glomerularcultures independent of the profound decrease in NOS The use of specific NOS inhibitors may cross-inhibitactivity over the 48-hour culture period [6]. The same other enzymes or enzyme systemsobservations were made on glomeruli isolated seven days These enzymes, by virtue of their metabolic proximity,after the induction of disease (unpublished data). When act on molecules possessing similar structural character-isolated mesangial cells were stimulated with a combina- istics. For example, the NOS inhibitors L-NIO andtion of cyclic adenosine 3�,5�-monophosphate (cAMP) L-NMMA inhibit uptake of arginine in endothelial cellsand IL-1�, IL-4 exerted the same effect of independently [57] since they are transported by the same cationic y�

increasing arginase activity and inhibiting NOS activity. transporter system as l-arginine [58]. A similar effectThis was accompanied by an increase in cell lysate argi- was demonstrated in rat renal brush border membranenase activity [6]. iNOS and Arginase I mRNA were unde- vesicles [59]. L-NMMA also was shown to inhibit arginasetectable in unstimulated glomeruli whereas Arginase II activity in rat macrophages, most likely by inhibition ofmRNA was detectable. iNOS and Arginase I mRNA arginine uptake [60]. �-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO)were induced by the cAMP agonist cholera toxin. Addi- is considered to be a potent ornithine decarboxylasetion of IL-4 increased expression of Arginase I mRNA inhibitor, however, it also has been shown to inhibit

arginase activity [61]. Many novel inhibitors of arginaseand abolished expression of iNOS mRNA [1].

Page 5: Arginase in glomerulonephritis

Waddington: Arginase in glomerulonephritis880

Reprint requests to Dr. Simon N. Waddington, Gene Therapy Groupand associated enzymes have not been rigorously testedSection, Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial

on their metabolic neighbors, upon which they may be College School of Science Technology and Medicine, Sir AlexanderFleming Building, Imperial College Road, London, England SW7 2AZ,having inhibitory effects or even acting as substrates.United Kingdom.E-mail: [email protected] of the NOS pathway may channel

substrate down the other pathwaysREFERENCES

This is actually a corollary of the points made in the1. Waddington SN, Mosley K, Cook HT, et al: Arginase AI issecond and third sections of this review regarding cross- upregulated in acute immune complex-induced inflammation. Bio-

inhibition and modulation of efferent pathways. As dis- chem Biophys Res Commun 247:84–87, 19982. Jansen A, Lewis S, Cattell V: Cook HT: Arginase is a majorcussed earlier, experiments have clearly demonstrated

pathway of arginine metabolism in nephritic glomeruli. Kidney Intthis phenomenon in vitro, yet the knowledge derived 42:1107–1112, 1992from these observations is not yet rigorously applied 3. Waddington SN, Tam FWK, et al: Arginase activity is modulated

by IL-4 and HOArg in nephritic glomeruli and mesangial cells.to interpretation of in vivo experiments. For example,Am J Physiol 274:F473–F480, 1998numerous studies administering the NOS inhibitors 4. Sonoki T, Nagasaki A, Gotoh T, et al: Coinduction of nitric-oxidesynthase and arginase I in cultured rat peritoneal macrophagesL-NAME and L-NIL have interpreted the results solelyand rat tissues in vivo by lipopolysaccharide. J Biol Chem 272:3689–in the context of NO inhibition without reference to the3693, 1997

possible consequences of increasing ornithine, polyam- 5. Carraway MS, Piantadosi CA, Jenkinson CP, Huang Y-CT:Differential expression of arginase and iNOS in the lung and sepsis.ines, proline or agmatine formation. A similarly naıveExp Lung Res 24:253–288, 1998interpretation was made of the results following NOS

6. Waddington SN, Tam FWK, Cook HT, Cattell V: Arginaseinhibition using systemic arginase in accelerated nephro- activity is modulated by IL-4 and HOArg in nephritic glomeruli

and mesangial cells. Am J Physiol 274:F473–F480, 1998toxic nephritis [12]. This concern should be addressed7. Hecker M, Nematholahi H, Hey C, et al: Inhibition of arginaseas more advanced methods of modulating arginine me- by N-hydroxyl-L-arginine in alveolar macrophages: Implications

tabolism become available. for the utilisation of L-arginine for nitric oxide synthesis. FEBSLett 359:251–254, 1995

8. Boucher J-L, Custot J, Vadon S, et al: N�-Hydroxy-L-arginine,Up- or down-regulation of enzymes may have minimalan intermediate in the L-arginine to nitric oxide pathway, is a strong

biological significance inhibitor of liver and macrophage arginase. Biochem Biophys ResCommun 203:1614–1621, 1994Although there is simultaneous up-regulation of sev-

9. Hrabak A, Bajor T, Temesi A: Comparison of substrate and inhibi-eral enzymes along a metabolic pathway, not all of these tor specificity of arginase and nitric oxide (NO) synthase for argi-

nine analogues and related compounds in murine and rat macro-enzymes necessarily contribute to the pathological pro-phages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 198:206–212, 1994cess in vivo. For example, although ornithine decarboxyl- 10. Shearer JD, Richards JR, Mills CD, Caldwell MD: Differential

ase (ODC) has been shown to be important for mesangial regulation of macrophage arginine metabolism: A proposed rolein wound healing. Am J Physiol 272:E181–E190, 1997cell proliferation in vitro and that ODC is increased in

11. Hibbs JB, Vavrin Z. Taintor RR: L-arginine is required for expres-Thy 1 glomerulonephritis, Ketteler showed that com- sion of the activated macrophage effector mechanism causing selec-plete ODC inhibition has no effect [62]. Furthermore, tive metabolic inhibition in target cells. J Immunol 138:550–565,

1987in this model, although glomeruli generate large amounts12. Waddington S, Cook HT, Reaveley D, et al: L-Arginine depletion

of NO in culture we found no effect on pathology after inhibits glomerular nitric oxide synthesis and exacerbates rat neph-rotoxic nephritis. Kidney Int 49:1090–1096, 1996NO inhibition using L-NMMA, L-NIL or arginase. In

13. Kaysen GA, Strecker HJ: Purification and properties of arginasea different model, heterologous nephrotoxic nephritis,of rat kidney. Biochem J 133:779–788, 1973

again we found no effect after L-NIL administration 14. Stuehr DJ, Kwon NS, Nathan CF, et al: N�-hydroxy-L-arginineis an intermediate in the biosynthesis of nitric oxide from L-argi-despite high glomerular NO production [63].nine. J Biol Chem 266:6259–6263, 1991The true complexity of interactions between these en- 15. Hrabak A, Bajor T, Temesi A: Computer-aided comparison of

zymes is becoming illuminated by current research. The the inhibition of arginase and nitric oxide synthase in macrophagesby amino acids not related to arginine. Comp Biochem Physiolinherent interdependency of these enzymes illustrates113B:375–381, 1996the difficulty in isolating and studying a single metabolic 16. Iyengar R, Stuehr DJ, Marletta MA: Macrophage synthesis of

pathway in an in vivo model; this necessitates interpreta- nitrite, nitrate and N-nitrosoamines: Precursors and role of therespiratory burst. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6369–6373, 1987tion that could be called gestalt pathology. With this

17. Noeh FM, Wenzel A, Harris N, et al: The effects of arginineapproach, recent studies have emphasized the impor- administration on the levels of arginine, other amino acids and

related amino compounds in the plasma, heart, aorta, vena cavatance of arginase and the balance of arginine-associatedand pancreas of the rat. Life Sci 58:131–138, 1996pathways in glomerulonephritis and inflammation.

18. Modolell M, Corraliza IM, Link F, et al: Reciprocal regulation ofthe nitric oxide synthase/arginase balance in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Eur J ImmunolACKNOWLEDGMENTS25:1101–1104, 1995

This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust and the National 19. Chang C-I, Liao JC, Kuo L: Arginase modulates nitric oxideKidney Research Fund. I thank Ms. Kenza Kheireddine, Ms. Suzy production in activated macrophages. Am J Physiol 274:H342–

H348, 1998Buckley and Mr. Matthew Edwards for manuscript preparation.

Page 6: Arginase in glomerulonephritis

Waddington: Arginase in glomerulonephritis 881

20. Li H, Meininger CJ, Hawker JR, Jr, et al: Regulatory role of 42. Chung HT, Pae HO, Choi BM, et al: Nitric oxide as a bioregulatorarginase I and II in nitric oxide, polyamine, and proline syntheses of apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 282:1075–1079, 2001in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280:E75–E82, 43. Boutard V, Havouis R, Fouqueray B, et al: Transforming growth2001 factor beta stimulates arginase activity in macrophages. J Immunol

21. Chang CI, Liao JC, Kuo L: Macrophage arginase promotes tumor 155:2077–2084, 1995cell growth and suppresses nitric oxide-mediated tumor cytotoxic- 44. Durante W, Liao L, Reyna SV, et al: Physiological cyclic stretchity. Cancer Res 61:1100–1106, 2001 directs L-arginine transport and metabolism to collagen synthesis

22. Kepka-Lenhart D, Mistry SK, Wu G, Morris SM Jr: Arginase in vascular smooth muscle. FASEB J 14:1775–1783, 2000I: A limiting factor for nitric oxide and polyamine synthesis by 45. Brune B, Hartzell P, Nicotera P, Orrenius S: Spermine preventsactivated macrophages? Am J Physiol (Regul Integr Comp Physiol) endonuclease activation and apoptosis in thymocytes. Exp Cell279:R2237–R2242, 2000 Res 195:323–329, 1991

23. Bivalacqua TJ, Hellstrom WJ, Kadowitz PJ, Champion HC: 46. Pfeilschifter J, Vosbeck K: Transforming growth factor �2 inhib-Increased expression of arginase II in human diabetic corpus cav- its the interleukin 1�- and tumour necrosis factor �-induction ofernosum: In diabetic-associated erectile dysfunction. Biochem Bio- nitric oxide synthase in rat renal mesangial cells. Biochem Biophysphys Res Commun 283:923–927, 2001 Res Commun 175:372–379, 1991

24. Gobert AP, Daulouede S, Lepoivre M, et al: L-Arginine availabil- 47. Cunha FQ, Moncada S, Liew FY: Interleukin-10 (IL-10) inhibitsity modulates local nitric oxide production and parasite killing in the induction of nitric oxide synthase by interferon-� in murineexperimental trypanosomiasis. Infect Immun 68:4653–4657, 2000 macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 182:1155–1159, 1992

25. Prabhakar SS, Zeballos GA, Montoya-Zavala M, Leonard C: 48. Liew FY, Li Y, Severn A, et al: A possible novel pathway ofUrea inhibits nitric oxide synthase in macrophage cell line. Am J regulation by murine T helper type-2 (Th2) cells of a Th1 cellPhysiol 273:C1882–C1888, 1997 activity via modulation of the induction of nitric oxide synthase

26. Satriano J, Ishizuka S, Archer DC, et al: Regulation of intracellu- on macrophages. Eur J Immunol 21:2489–2494, 1991lar polyamine biosynthesis and transport by NO and cytokines 49. Corraliza IM, Soler G, Eichmann K, Modolell M: ArginaseTNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. Am J Physiol 276:C892–C899, 1999 induction by suppressors of nitric oxide synthesis (IL-4, IL-10,

27. Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wei LH, et al: Role of the arginine-nitric PGE2) in murine bone-marrow-derived macrophages. Biochemoxide pathway in the regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell Biophys Res Commun 206:667–673, 1995proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4202–4208, 2001 50. Munder M, Eichmann K, Modolell M: Alternative metabolic

28. Bauer PM, Buga GM, Fukuto JM, et al: Nitric oxide inhibits states in murine macrophages reflected by the nitric oxide synthase/ornithine decarboxylase via S-nitrosylation of cysteine 360 in the arginase balance: competitive regulation by CD4� T cells corre-active site of the enzyme. J Biol Chem 276:34458–34464, 2001 lates with Th1/Th2 phenotype. J Immunol 160:5347–5354, 1998

29. Ishizuka S, Cunard R, Poucell-Hatton S, et al: Agmatine inhibits 51. Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, et al: M-1/M-2 macrophages andcell proliferation and improves renal function in anti-thy-1 glomer- the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol 164:6166–6173, 2000ulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:2256–2264, 2000 52. Bernard AC, Mistry SK, Morris SM Jr, et al: Alterations in

30. Szabo C, Southan GJ, Thiemerman C, Vane J: The mechanismarginine metabolic enzymes in trauma. Shock 15:215–219, 2001of the inhibitory effect of polyamines on the induction of nitric

53. Ochoa JB, Bernard AC, Mistry SK, et al: Trauma increases extra-oxide synthase: Role of aldehyde metabolites. Br J Pharmacolhepatic arginase activity. Surgery 127:419–426, 2000113:757–766, 1994

54. Huang M-H, Yang C-C, Wang S-R: Inhibition of lymphocyte31. Blachier F, Mignon A, Soubrane O: Polyamines inhibit lipopoly-proliferation by liver arginase. Life Sci 51:1725–1730, 1992saccharide-induced nitric oxide synthase activity in rat liver cytosol.

55. Klein D, Morris DR: Increased arginase activity during lympho-Nitric Biol Chem 1:268–272, 1997cyte mitogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 81:199–204, 197832. Sooranna SR, Das I: The inter-relationship between polyamines

56. Hacker-Shahin B, Droge W: Putrescine and its biosynthetic pre-and the L-arginine nitric oxide pathway in the human placenta.cursor L-ornithine augment the in vivo immunisation against minorBiochem Biophys Res Commun 212:229–234, 1995histocompatibility antigens and syngeneic tumour cells. Cell Immu-33. Patterton D, Shi Y-B: Thyroid hormone-dependent differentialnol 99:434–443, 1986regulation of multiple arginase genes during amphibian metamor-

57. Bogle R, Moncada S, Pearson JD, Mann G: Identification ofphosis. J Biol Chem 269:25328–25334, 1994inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase that do not interact with the34. Russell DH, McVicker TA: Polyamine biogenesis in the rat mam-endothelial cell L-arginine transport. Br J Pharmacol 105:768–770,mary gland during pregnancy and lactation. Biochem J 130:71–76,19921972

58. Baydoun AR, Mann GE: Selective targeting of nitric oxide syn-35. Yip MC, Knox WE: Function of arginase in lactating mammarythase inhibitors to system y� in activated macrophages. Biochemgland. Biochem J 127:893–899, 1972Biophys Res Commun 200:726–731, 199436. Durante W, Liao L, Reyna SV, et al: Transforming growth factor-

59. Edwards RM, Stack EJ, Trizna W: Interaction of L-argininebeta(1) stimulates L-arginine transport and metabolism in vascularanalogs with L-arginine uptake in rat renal brush border membranesmooth muscle cells: Role in polyamine and collagen synthesis.vesicles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:1019–1022, 1998Circulation 103:1121–1127, 2001

60. Keller R, Keist R, Klauser S, Schweiger A: The macrophage37. Buga GM, Wei LH, Bauer PM, et al: NG-hydroxy-L-arginine andresponse to bacteria: Flow of L-arginine through the nitric oxidenitric oxide inhibit Caco-2 tumor cell proliferation by distinct mech-and urea pathways and induction of tumoricidal activity. Biochemanisms. Am J Physiol 275:R1256–R1264, 1998Biophys Res Commun 177:821–827, 199138. Durante W, Liao L, Peyton KJ, Schafer AI: Lysophosphatidyl-

61. Selamnia M, Mayeur C, Robert V, Blachier F: �-Difluoromethy-choline regulates cationic amino acid transport and metabolism inlornithine (DFMO) as a potent arginase activity inhibitor in humanvascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 272:30154–30159, 1997colon carcinoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol 55:1241–1245, 199839. Albina JE, Mills CD, Henry WL, Caldwell MD: Temporal

62. Ketteler M, Westenfeld R, Gawlik A, et al: Acute glomerularexpression of different pathways of L-arginine metabolism in heal-upregulation of ornithine decarboxylase is not essential for mesan-ing wounds. J Immunol 144:3877–3880, 1990gial cell proliferation and matrix expansion in anti-Thy-1-nephritis.40. Albina JE, Caldwell MD, Henry WL, Mills CD: RegulationNephrol Dial Transplant 15:16–22, 2000of macrophage functions by L-arginine. J Exp Med 169:1021–1029,

63. Waddington SN, Mosley K, Cattell V: Induced nitric oxide1989(NO) synthesis in heterologous nephrotoxic nephritis; effects of41. Cook HT, Jansen A, Lewis S, et al: Arginine metabolism in experi-selective inhibition in neutrophil-dependent glomerulonephritis.mental glomerulonephritis: interaction between nitric oxide syn-

thase and arginase. Am J Physiol 267:F646–F653, 1994 Clin Exp Immunol (in press)