Upload
shaine-burris
View
59
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Arguments & evidence. How incredibly stupid not to have thought of that Thomas Huxley. Arguments. Blending inheritance Variability Isolation Age of the earth. Arguments. Blending inheritance -new adaptations diluted with each generation. Darwin’s reply: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Arguments & evidence
How incredibly stupid not to have thought of that
Thomas Huxley
Arguments
Blending inheritance
Variability
Isolation
Age of the earth
Arguments
Blending inheritance-new adaptations diluted with each generation
Darwin’s reply:
Favorable traits maintained if popln isolated
Some traits ‘preponent’
Adaptive traits arise often
Enhanced reproduction of favorable traits
Arguments
Variability-Darwin confined natural selection to small,
continuous variation
How could new spp arise from small variations?-successive change through time
How could small variations confer an advantage?-Darwin could not answer, later demonstrated
How could selection act on a nonexistent trait?-preadaptation - new organ modified from another
1% per generation change in anatomy
<500000 yrs
Arguments
Isolation-how could a new spp evolve in close
proximity to its parents
Darwin did not emphasize isolation as a primary cause for evolution
Arguments
Age of the earth-earth was not old enough to allow time
for evolution
5,000
50,000
75,000
100,000,000
Biblical
Newton
Buffon
Kelvin
4,500,000,000present
Arguments
Blending inheritance
Variability
Isolation
Age of the earth
Evidence
Systematics
Geographic distribution
Comparative anatomy
Embryology
Fossils
Artificial selection
Direct observation
EvidenceSystematics
-gradation of species easily understood by evolutionary relationships
EvidenceGeographic distribution
-evolutionarily related organisms geographically connected
EvidenceGeographic distribution
-evolutionarily related organisms geographically connected
marsupial radiation
EvidenceComparative anatomy
homologous/analogous organs
EvidenceComparative anatomy
homologous/analogous organs
Darwin’s interpretation of homology has become the definition: similarity due to common ancestry
EvidenceComparative anatomy
homologous/analogous organs
Organisms show curious similarities in structure and development unrelated to function
EvidenceComparative anatomy
convergent evolution
EvidenceComparative anatomy
vestigial organs
EvidenceComparative anatomy
vestigial organs
femur
whale ancestor
modern whale
Organisms have vestigial structural, developmental and molecular traits
Vestigial structures are a manifestation of change through time
EvidenceEmbryology
-remarkable similarity among diverse vertebrates
EvidenceFossils
-vast majority of fossil forms differ from extant spp
extinction
succession
transitional forms
environmental changes
EvidenceFossils
-vast majority of fossil forms differ from extant spp
extinction
The fact that many species have gone extinct suggests that Earth’s flora and fauna have changed over time
EvidenceFossils
-vast majority of fossil forms differ from extant spp
transitional forms
EvidenceFossils
-vast majority of fossil forms differ from extant spp
“living fossils”
EvidenceFossils
-vast majority of fossil forms differ from extant spp
extinction
succession
transitional forms
environmental changes
EvidenceArtificial selection
-accelerated evolution based on human-favored traits
EvidenceArtificial selection
-accelerated evolution based on human-favored traits
EvidenceDirect observation
-natural selection can be observed in real time
Observations on living organisms show that populations and species change over time