Ark Permaculture Project burdau

8/3/2019 Ark Permaculture Project burdau...

1/19

perfect science
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N--bUSzlnRo&feature=BF&list=QL&index=6http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N--bUSzlnRo&feature=BF&list=QL&index=6http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N--bUSzlnRo&feature=BF&list=QL&index=6


2/19


3/19

[email protected] /1-815-838-2001

Dan O'Connell Perfect Science AD Joliet, Illinois watching Macus

MacCabe Ireland

talking to Perfect Science Aydu Doyuk about using the formula's in a

clean-up site in Northern Ireland

Drunvalo talk in Wesak created a confusion in the mind of Flower of

Life followers. Drunvalo talk about

water making his follower believe that they could with teaching fromhim Drunvalo clean -up lake with a drop of

Perfect Science and a Lake would be clean . This is crazy Perfect

Science who was at the meeting in Washington tried

to post the truth legal and otherwise inform them that this is not

true . With no results occult thinking is set in stone .

This is from the web site of Perfect Science's Terry Welch response

e are posting this letter on the website, because you are posting
http://www.ayhandoyukdeadbeatdad.com/response.htmlhttp://www.ayhandoyukdeadbeatdad.com/response.htmlhttp://www.ayhandoyukdeadbeatdad.com/response.html


4/19

false information.

In truth, you were caught stealing from Wanda, and the police havethe report on the charges. You stole products that make products -not "magic" water because there is no magic. The Truth is DrunvaloLied in 1999 ( arranged by Eric Ekvall , Remote Viewer Program ,Charter Trading ( 1992 ) , Ms Wards time in London oil for Iran ,

So who is the thief and the liar - you, Ayhan Doyuk , Drunvalo , EricEkvall , Micheal Rowen , Micheal Moreland , SAIC , Peter Jackson ,Shelia MacArthy , Anne Merrile , Flower of Life , Spirit OF Maat ,http://www.spiritofmaat.com/ Tom Woodall Lawyer who came in 1992 ,Houston , Texas , J Z Knight The Ram who would not let her people seeour conference who works with Micheal Moreland of SAIC .

. Charges have been filed, and you are going to court.

Everything you say about Perfect Science and Terry Welch is a lie,because if it was true, you would take us to court. This includesthose who are sending us viruses and attacking us on the web.

It is not true what Ayhan is saying, and we will sue you and include

you as co-conspirators in the court case against Ayhan.

If all of you believe that this is water, it is not - it is aformula. Ayhan Doyuk stole from people in Poland.

There is no "magic" water. It is a formula, scientifically based andprovable.

If this was "magic" water that Ayhan created, why has he not cleanedthe planet's waters?


5/19

Why would he need your money? He is using his supporters to raisemoney to cheat these people out of tens of millions of dollars. If hedid this to you, be forewarned.

You either stand up for the truth or go to court to face charges ofco-conspiracy. Contact the people he just robbed. Here is thepolicereport charging Ayhan Doyuk in Poland.

Between 1990 and 1992 in London and eventually in Turkey

Ireland after Flower of Life , Wesak , Drunvalo talk

many people from Drunvalo following tried to stop the Perfect Science

Formula's from being used in 1999/2000/2001/2002

Marcus MacCabe also ran for a seat in the government in Ireland .

His friends in picture above with Dan O'Connell and Doyuk caused alot of confusion and lied for a local company so their systems of

clean -up would be used over Perfect Science this happened in 1999 .

Drunvalo follower which Marcus was one them could not take control

over Perfect Science in Aug 1999 . Drunvalo tries to stop any one

after his using them to advance himself with fake history of many not

just Perfect Science. Doyuk went along with Drunvalo vision by not

telling the truth or correcting Drunvalo Lie's .

From: Ark Permaculture Project [email protected]>

To: Mike Mickley


6/19

Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 11:46 AM

Subject: Re: Irish testing - moving ahead

Dear Mike,

Your account of what happened at the conference is plausible. Billy

Mo ores e-mail is xxx I think! They are closed now so I can't ring.

Anyway he only sometimes reads them. Or you could ring him at

xxxx. His secretary is Bernie Mc Ma hon. Ask for her first when you

get through to the Council. Ma eve Quinn's is sick at the moment so

Patricia Mall on is dealing with analysis her e-mail is xxx. I

cannot afford to get involved in bringing this through the process

you propose. I am afraid the effort of organizing the conference

left me rather in debt which I have only recently sorted out. I am

very busy with my own business these days. If you want to hire me at

this end it would be at my typical rate. As I said before Jack OSullivan would be a good man > for the job. I would be interested

and anxious to see you proceed with a proper test. That was the

original intention however poorly events transpired. What contract

were you congratulating me on?!

Marcus

This was a fake when we were attacked at the time their were no labs

so the reports that were done and throwing the glass at me were all

done by Drunvalo , Eric Ekvall , Micheal Rowen , and who pays them to

take over the tech or stop it , So we sent Ayhan Doyuk with David

Jeans to England then to Turkey where Lex and I met up with himagain in the Londra Hotel to talk .

Micheal wrote this out but


7/19

MICKLEY & ASSOCIATES 752 Gapter Road Boulder, Colorado 80303

Consulting Chemical & Processing Engineers Phone (303) 499-3133 Fax (303) 499-5305

FPerfect Science Of Boulder Inc Delaware

Perfect Science AD Delaware April 1998

Perfect Science Illinois

March 13 , 2001 6153-5357

He wrote the research for the 12 month research system wellness ,health

for Perfect Science Eco System Balance The Planet

: Mike Mickley

DA: February 21, 2000

SUBJECT: Draft Plan for Irish test - version 2.1


8/19

Comments:

With focus changing from the lake to a smaller site of the landfill

leach ate pond, the plan

becomes much simpler, as does the level of effort. More

specifically, relative to version 1.0,

this version reflects

1. Less equipment need

2. Less chemical need

3. Simpler application (smaller volume; less

time needed; easier access to pond)

4. Simpler characterization of the material

to be treated

5. Simpler logistics to treat the pond

6. Less cost

The new element introduced is that we will need to sample the pond

and get the sample to

Mr. Doyuk for development of the treatment chemical.

Two general areas of effort

Legal and funding effort (handled by Dan OConn ell)

To set up an agreement between the Irish government

(County/EPA/?) and

Perfect Science that 1) would address the liability issues and 2)

would address responsibilityfor all project costs.

Under the liability issue agreement, a waiver would be granted

to Perfect Science or the

government would cover the required insurance costs.

Under the cost agreement Perfect Science would provide

treatment chemical only.


9/19

These agreements would need to be in place prior to final

treatment of the pond

(STEP 7 below)

Technical effort (handled by Mike Mickley)

To develop and implement all technical plans required for

sampling, characterizing, and

treating the pond.

STEP 1 is to characterize the leach ate pond dimensions,

volume and depth; presence of

sediment, etc.; also the treatment logistics.

STEP 2 is to sample the leach ate pond and send/take sample to

Ayhan for development

of the appropriate treatment chemical [likely involve Jack

OSullivan here]; do the samplingaccording to an agreed-upon sampling and testing regimen that

involves multiple labs for analytical

work and specified sampling and analytical protocols. This might

take a trip to Ireland to assist and

to pick up the sample.

STEP 3 is to conduct a bench-scale test in Ireland (This will

require a trip to Ireland)

STEP 4 is to design any equipment that might be needed to

treat the leach ate pond.

STEP 5 is to develop estimates of total project costs

STEP 6 is to fabricate any required equipment and test it

prior to leach ate pond treatment.

STEP 7 is to treat the leach ate pond (This, of course, will

require a trip to Ireland)

Other comments

The above tasks and others such as manufacturing and shipping

the treatment chemicals will

require several months of elapsed time. Pond treatment is best

scheduled for Spring/Summer.


10/19

Actual timing will be dependent on the scheduling and

accomplishment of prior tasks.

The successful repeated bench-scale test should relieve and

placate local people and authorities

and reduce, significantly, the level of responsibility and

concern carried by Marcus.

Pond treatment time is estimated to be one day. Mr William Baumgartner will provide the final design of

any equipment required.

Any equipment needed will be fabricated in Ireland, if

possible.

Where possible we will use local people and companies for

conducting the work.

Treatment will be done from two boats. The lead boat will

contain treatment chemical, pump,

and distribution piping for injecting the chemical into the

pond. A second boat will contain a

second treatment chemical and spray equipment for spraying thelake surface with a

pH-balancing chemical. The two boats will systematically cover

the entire lake.

COST ITEMS

Travel and expenses to/in/from Ireland

Treatment chemical cost

Coordination costs [Jack OSullivan should not be much;

likely some of his time would

be volunteered]

Sampling and analysis costs [likely EPA will pay for their

tests, we would want parallel

tests to be conducted]

Equipment costs [should be low]

MICKLEY & ASSOCIATES 752 Gapter Road Boulder, Colorado 80303

Consulting Chemical & Processing Engineers Phone (303) 499-3133 Fax (303) 499-5305


11/19

Subject:

Irish testing -moving ahead

Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000

14:30:08 -0600

Dear Marcus,

I believe my last communication to you was dated February 21, 2000. It was entitled

draft plan for Irish test version 2.1. I wont repeat the content but have included that

memo as an attachment to this email. As a necessary step preliminary to moving on theaction steps outlined in that memo we want to clean up the issues surrounding the

test results. Below I review the history surrounding the test results and then the

proposed means of settling the test issues.

HISTORY

Review of Test conditions and Test Results

To review the situation - as I recall:

1. Lake water was initially sampled and put intocontainers that were not clean.

None of us noticed this. However, after the lake water was

put into theholding tank several of us noted a strong gasoline-type odor,

a bit of a sheen

on the surface, and a yellow-brown color in the tank water.


12/19

2. We agreed that the sample was contaminated and itappeared that this was

due to the use of unclean sample containers.

3. The tank water was poured out and the tank was cleaned.

4. I recall searching for soap and for towels thatwhoever cleaned the tank

eventually used. The tank was not thoroughly rinsed nor

exhaustively

cleaned as time and materials did not allow AND the need for

this was not

anticipated.

5. New water was brought in and put into the cleantank. This new sample

was much different and appeared to be much cleaner that the

initial sample

and without the strong gasoline-type odor.

6. Eventually the tank sample was treated and as ischaracteristic of this treatment,

suspended solids and color settled to the tank bottom as a

whitish floc material

leaving the supernatant liquid very clear.

7. A small fish was placed in the tank and it was seen toswim and eat.

8. Im not sure when I became aware that samples of thewater before and

after treatment had been taken for lab analysis. It may have

been when

you called people together to review the results.


13/19

9. You showed me a piece of paper (I do not have a copy)that had

before and after results for 5 to 10 measured parameters of

the water.

Please note they never gave a copy at was a show for the new

age a way

of stopping Perfect Science Formula's . This was done for

their pocket's

10. One of the parameters was phosphorous and according tothe results the

final (after) level was something like 10 times the initial

level

Some comments on the tests (most of which were made in Ireland also):

If we had known that tests were going to be run we would have

taken several

appropriate measures that include:

o Making sure all containers and tanks were clean

and could not contaminate

the solutions.

o Making sure the lake sample taken was

representative of the lake

o Being present during the sampling of the treated

tank contents

o Keeping retention samples that could be analyzed

later in case test

results were questionable

o Making sure that the parameters to be measured

were meaningful

ones and reflective of the treatment effects.


14/19

o Making sure that more than one lab were doing the

analyses

The Perfect Science formulas for water treatment do not

contain phosphorus.

The most likely possibilities for explaining the test results

are:

o The tank was contaminated with phosphate-

containing detergent

used to clean it after the initial fiasco

o The before and after samples were mislabeled and

the true after sample

was the one with the lower phosphorus level

o The treated sample was purposely altered

I tend to believe that the first explanation is the correct

one although consider the following:

Lets say the tank volume was 20 liters. Lets say the volume

of treatment chemical used

was about 20 milliliter (1,000 times less than the tank volume).

For the tank phosphorus

level after treatment to be 10 times higher than before the

treatment, the treatment formula

would have to have a phosphorus concentration 10,000 times higherthan that in the untreated

water. [Note that if 50 ml of treatment formula were used, the

concentration would need

to be 2,000 times higher] I will find out the typical level of

phosphorus in phosphate

detergents it may well be that phosphate-containing detergent

will not be a plausible

explanation in which case we are left with the other two possible

explanations.

MOVING AHEAD

To settle the matter, lets repeat the test this time under controlled conditions and with your

EPA involved. We will need to work out the details but they will involve:


15/19

Obtaining a copy of the previous test results and doing some

further investigation

into what the likely explanation of the results was

Taking multiple and representative samples according to a

chain-of-custody procedure

Treating the samples with our formula

Having accredited labs in both Ireland and elsewhere to do

analyses of the samples

Comparing our results

Working with your EPA to address the real environmental

problems that exist

We will be copying various labs that we intend to work with and when we all agree on if and

how to move forward, we will inform you of the lab identities.

click

I look forward to hearing from you and if we are all in agreement, I will propose more specific

steps for moving ahead in the next several weeks.

Regards, Mikeperfect science

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Ad57f1ZjdUUaZGY0OXJuanRfNDk1Z3hudnFraHM&hl=en

PS1: Could you please provide email addresses for Billy Moore and for Maeve Quinn?

PS2: Congratulations on you new contract

Contract we are refering to is the one his friends got and his reward for putting on a fake show .

click
http://docs.google.com/View?id=df49rnjt_495gxnvqkhshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N--bUSzlnRo&feature=BF&list=QL&index=6http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Ad57f1ZjdUUaZGY0OXJuanRfNDk1Z3hudnFraHM&hl=enhttp://docs.google.com/View?id=df49rnjt_495gxnvqkhshttp://docs.google.com/View?id=df49rnjt_495gxnvqkhshttp://docs.google.com/View?id=df49rnjt_495gxnvqkhshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N--bUSzlnRo&feature=BF&list=QL&index=6http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Ad57f1ZjdUUaZGY0OXJuanRfNDk1Z3hudnFraHM&hl=enhttp://docs.google.com/View?id=df49rnjt_495gxnvqkhshttp://docs.google.com/View?id=df49rnjt_495gxnvqkhs


16/19


17/19


18/19


19/19

Documents

Ark Permaculture Project burdau