If you can't read please download the document
Upload
ronie-colemen
View
219
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
advance research methods lecture 1
Citation preview
Research: An Introduction
Muhammad Azeem Qureshi
Lecture 1
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Recommended Books
Introduction to Research Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies
2015-Fifth Edition (Elizabeth DePoy, Laura N. Gitlin): (ELSEVIER)
Research Methods Research Methods Concepts and Connections
(Michael W. Passer)
2014 by Worth Publishers, Macmillan Higher Education
Business Research Methods Eight Edition (Zikmund, Babin, Carr & Griffin)
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Recommended Books
Research Methods for Business Students 2009-5th Edition (Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, Adrian Thornhill)
Fundamental of Research Methodology & Statistics Yogesh Kumar Singh
2006 New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers 2006 New Age International (P) Ltd., Publishers
Research Methodology Methods & Techniques
2nd Revised Edition (C. R. Kothari)
Research Methods for Business A Skill Building Approach
4th Edition (Uma Sekran)
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Research
A process employed to find out solution to a problem.
An activity to answer the questions which have not
been answered yet.
Systematic investigative process employed to increase Systematic investigative process employed to increase
or revise current knowledge by discovering new facts.
It starts from observation and identification of problem.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
The research in Natural & Social Science
The natural sciences are different from the
social sciences in several respects. The
natural sciences are very precise, accurate,
deterministic, and independent of the person
making the scientific observations while in
social sciences, the subjective approach is
used.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Scientific Knowledge
Scientific knowledge refers to a
generalized body of laws and theories to
explain a phenomenon or behavior ofexplain a phenomenon or behavior of
interest that are acquired using the
scientific method.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
What is The Scientific Method?
A method of systematic observation,
measurement, and experiment is called
The Scientific Method.The Scientific Method.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
The Hallmarks of Scientific Research
Purposiveness
Rigor (Exactitude & Carefulness)
Testability
Replicability
Precision and Confidence (Closesnes of findings to reality & Estimations are correct)
Objectivity
Generalizability
Parsimony (Simplicity)
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Theory
Theory refers to generalization about a phenomenon
and gives explanation about how or why something
occurs.
Theory is a formal, testable explanation of some Theory is a formal, testable explanation of some
events that includes explanations of how things relate
to one another.
The power of a theory is its ability to connect events
into a unified web.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Theory (Continue)
It may also be described as a system of generalizable
statements that are logically linked together to understand or
predict human phenomena.
There are two goals of a theory
Understanding and predicting. (explanation through
supplement material given to students)
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Theory (Continue)
A theory can be built through a process of reviewing previous findings of
similar studies, simple logical deduction, and/or knowledge of applicable
theoretical areas.
For example, if a Web designer is trying to decide what color background is
most effective in increasing online sales, he may first consult previous
studies examining the effects of color on package design and retail
store design. He may also find theories that deal with the wavelength of
different colors, affective response to colors, or those that explain retail
atmospherics. This may lead to the specific prediction that blue is the most
effective background color for a Web site.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Laws and Theories
Laws are observed and established patterns of
phenomena or behaviors, while
Theories are systematic explanations of the
underlying phenomenon or behavior.underlying phenomenon or behavior.
The goal of scientific research is to discover laws and
postulate theories that can explain natural or social
phenomena, or in other words, build scientific
knowledge.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Laws and Theories
We arrive at scientific laws or theories
through a process of logic and evidence.
Logic (theory) and evidence (observations)Logic (theory) and evidence (observations)
are the two, and only two, pillars upon
which scientific knowledge is based.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Induction and Deduction
Induction and deduction are two different
reasoning strategies. In other words, they
are two different ways to figure out theare two different ways to figure out the
solution to a problem.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Induction (From specific to general)
With induction - you start with your own experience and
then generalize a rule. For example, The last ten times I
touched the hot stove I burnt my hand. I bet every time I
touch the hot stove my hand will be burned.
Another example: Because the last few times I cut my
hair, it grew back. Inductive reasoning allows me to
generalize that after anyone cut his/her hair it will always
grow back.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Induction (From specific to general)
It is a theory building approach.
On the basis of a theory and its propositions, hypotheses
are derived and then formally tested.
Experimental-type researchers primarily use deductive
logic.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Deduction (From general to specific)
With deduction - you start with a rule and then apply it to
new situations. For example: The law of gravity says that
what goes up must come down, so I bet if I throw this
ball up it will fall back down.
Another example: Since my teacher's grading policy
states that he takes 1 point off for each spelling mistake,
I can deduce that I will lose 5 points if I make five
spelling mistakes.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Deduction (From general to specific)
It is a theory testing approach.
Using a deductive type of reasoning, the researcher
begins with the acceptance of a general principle or
belief based on a particular theoretical framework. This
principle is then applied or used to explain a specific
case or phenomenon. This approach involves drawing
out or verifying what is already accepted as accurate.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Conducting scientific research, therefore, requires two sets
of skills theoretical and methodological needed to
operate in the theoretical and empirical levels
respectively. Methodological skills ("know-how") are
relatively standard, invariant across disciplines, and
easily acquired through doctoral programs. However,
theoretical skills ("know what") is considerably harder to
master, requires years of observation and reflection.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
They cannot be taught but rather learnt though
experience. All of the greatest scientists in the history of
mankind, such as Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Neils Bohr,
Adam Smith, were master theoreticians, and they are
remembered for the theories they postulated thatremembered for the theories they postulated that
transformed the course of science. Methodological skills
are needed to be an ordinary researcher, but theoretical
skills are needed to be an extraordinary researcher.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Abductive Reasoning
Abductive reasoning typically begins with an incomplete set of
observations and proceeds to the likeliest possible
explanation for the set. Abductive reasoning yields the kind of
daily decision-making that does its best with the informationdaily decision-making that does its best with the information
at hand, which often is incomplete.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Abductive Reasoning
A medical diagnosis is an application of abductive reasoning:
given this set of symptoms, what is the diagnosis that would
best explain most of them? Likewise, when jurors hear
evidence in a criminal case, they must consider whether theevidence in a criminal case, they must consider whether the
prosecution or the defense has the best explanation to cover
all the points of evidence. While there may be no certainty
about their verdict, since there may exist additional evidence
that was not admitted in the case, they make their best guess
based on what they know.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Sources of Knowledge or Beliefs
Philosopher and scientist Charles Peirce (1877),in an article titled The Fixation of Belief,described four methods by which people cometo hold beliefs about the world:to hold beliefs about the world:
1) Tenacity
2) Authority
3) Reason
4) Science
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Tenacity involves believing something simplybecause it is what we have long believed.
There is no exploration of ones beliefs, noreasoned contemplation of opposing viewpoints.
Peirce argued that tenacity involves closing
Tenacity
Peirce argued that tenacity involves closingoneself off to information that is inconsistentwith, or otherwise threatens, a rmly held belief.
Although he clearly viewed tenacity as anunsatisfactory method upon which to base onesknowledge and beliefs, Peirce noted that itpossessed strength, simplicity, and directness(1877, Section V, Para 12).
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
AUTHORITY
Authority involves relying on other people asour source of knowledge and beliefs, and itspervasive throughout our life. In childhood webegin to rely on parents, other caregivers,begin to rely on parents, other caregivers,siblings, teachers, friends, television, radio, theweb and books etc.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
AUTHORITY (Continue)
As a college student, you rely on authority when youacquire knowledge from your professors and textbooks. Ifyou decide not to take a course from a particularinstructor because a friend says Dont do it, his lecturesare really boring, or He will not give you good marksthen youve relied on your friend as an authority.then youve relied on your friend as an authority.
We are most likely to view someone as credible whenthe following are true: We believe that the person has expertise on thesubject. We perceive the person as trustworthy.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
REASON
Reason rests on the use of logic and rational (i.e.,intellectually sound) argument to reach a conclusionabout how things must be.
Scientists use reasoning when they construct theories toaccount for known facts and when they deriveScientists use reasoning when they construct theories toaccount for known facts and when they derivehypotheses from theories in order to test those theories.
But scientic knowledge is not based on the method ofreason only. The primary limitation of the method ofreason is that different logical conclusions can be drawndepending on the premises one begins with. For example:
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
REASON (Continue)
Although opposite conclusions are reached, bothconclusions are logically valid, given the startingassumption that their respective premises are true. But inreality, of course, both conclusions cant be true.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Moreover, in the real world of human behavior, neitherof the premises about infants understanding of objectpermanence may be true.
For example, the age at which children acquire anunderstanding of object permanence may vary fromchild to child.
Perhaps its the case that 70% of infants understandobject permanence by 7 months of age. In that case weobject permanence by 7 months of age. In that case wewould have to phrase our conclusion in probabilisticterms: There is a 70% chance that Alice understandsthe concept of object permanence.
Pure reason is a poor basis for understanding behavior:
What reason can provide, however, is absolute clarityabout the phenomenon
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
EMPIRICISM
A great deal of what we know comes directly from our senses: from what we see, hear, touch, and so forth. Knowledge based on the senseson experiences with the worldis called on experiences with the worldis called empirical knowledge.
The related term, empiricism, is the process of acquiring knowledge directly through observation and experience.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
EMPIRICISM (Continue)
As a method of acquiring knowledge,empiricism is a central building block ofscience.
But especially in its raw personal form, as you But especially in its raw personal form, as youand I learn about the world and form beliefsbased on our direct experiences, empiricismhas limitations and risks.
First, no matter how full and varied our livesare, none of us experience everything.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
EMPIRICISM (Continue)
Second, our experiences may not berepresentative of other peoples experiences.
Students or followers may have differentopinion about the same teacher/leader, but inopinion about the same teacher/leader, but inreality the case may be entirely different.
Their knowledge is different because theyvehad different experiences.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
EMPIRICISM (Continue) Third, even if our experiences are representative,
we may interpret or remember them in a biasedmanner.
Your teacher may act fairly and consistently to allthe employees, but you and your colleague mightthe employees, but you and your colleague mightbe hypersensitive to criticism. Therefore, you mayinterpret as criticism remarks made by theteacher that most students would interpret asconstructive feedback.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Conclusion
Reason alone doesnt constitute sufcientevidence,
Nor do claims made by authorities withoutgood empirical evidence to back up thosegood empirical evidence to back up thoseassertions.
Collecting evidence without evaluating it anddrawing conclusions wont get us far; we needto use reasoning.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH
The following characteristics may be gathered from the
definitions of Research
1. It places emphasis upon the discovery of general principles.
3. It is an exact systematic and accurate investigation.
4. It uses certain valid data gathering devices.4. It uses certain valid data gathering devices.
5. It is logical and objective.
6. The researcher resists the temptation to seek only the data
that support his hypotheses.
7. The researcher eliminates personal feelings and preferences.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH (Continue)
8. It endeavors to organize data in quantitative terms.
9. Research is patient and unhurried activity.
10. The researcher is willing to follow his procedures to the
conclusions that may be unpopular and bring social
disapproval.disapproval.
11. Research is carefully recorded and reported.
12. Conclusions and generalizations are arrived at
carefully and cautiously.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD RESEARCHER
1. He should be sensitive in his nature.
2. He should be problem-minded.
3. He should have mastery on the area and should have specialization in the field studied.
4. He should have a scientific outlook about the area.
5. He should be able to think reflectively on the field studied. 5. He should be able to think reflectively on the field studied.
(Active, persistent, and careful consideration of any belief /knowledge)
6. He should have tolerance and patience.
7. He should be interested in the field studied.
8. He should be honest and devotee to his work.
9. He should have the curiosity to find out something new or to answer some questions which are still to be answered.
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Ten Essentials of Research
1. Identify philosophical foundation2. Frame a research problem3. Determine supporting knowledge4. Identify a theory base5. Develop a specific question or query5. Develop a specific question or query6. Select a design strategy7. Set study boundaries8. Obtain information9. Analyze information and draw conclusions10. Share and use research knowledge
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Ten Essentials of Research
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
Ten Essentials of Research
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com
The process of conducting research does notmean following linear steps, such as decidinghypothesis, collecting data and data analysis,rather it implies getting deeper into therather it implies getting deeper into thephenomenon under investigation andcontribute to knowledge for the sake ofknowledge.
Designing a research is as much art as science
Muha
mmad
Azee
m Qu
reshi
Rese
arch A
nalys
t & Le
cturer
IBT-Ka
rachi
email:
azee
m.qu
reshi@
hotm
ail.com