Upload
barnaby-freeman
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ART AND SCIENCE
Plus Medical PL SymposiumMarch 11-12, 2003
Regis Coccia, Managing Editor Business InsuranceEd Wrobel, Tillinghast-Towers Perrin
Julie E. Robertson, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPPaul Longman, Employers Re
Seamus Tivnan, Marsh Cayman Islands
ART AND SCIENCE
Plus Medical PL SymposiumMarch 11-12, 2003
Ed WrobelTillinghast-Towers Perrin
phone: (860) 843 7022 fax: (860) 843 7001email: [email protected]
3
Why ART?The Buyers’ Perspective
• $1B+ in premium needs to find a home– (St Paul, PHICO, MIIX, Reliance, Reciprocal of
America….)
• Substantial increases in rate and retention• Limitations in coverage• Non-renewals
=> Significantly greater risk retention required of smaller entities
=> Formalization of risk retention vehicle
4
The Buyers’ Perspective
“Our loss experience is better than average - we’re being painted with a broad brush”
5
The Actuarial Perspective
“Our loss experience is better than average - we’re being painted with a broad brush”
– – Really?
6
The Actuarial Perspective
• The captive feasibility study– Actuarial / financial analysis– Legal / regulatory / tax issues– Coverage / structure – Reinsurance
7
The Actuarial Perspective
• Key Issues in the Current Environment– Critical Mass
• Economically feasible to absorb frictional costs • Stability / predictability of loss costs
– Capital/surplus• Adequacy for smaller entities
10
The Actuarial Perspective
• Key Issues in the Current Environment– Credibility of data
• Consistency: changing carriers• Case reserve adequacy / strengthening• Reliance on industry information
– Impact of trends, legislative changes– Source / mechanism for funding in the event of
adverse experience– Affordability
ART AND SCIENCE
Plus Medical PL SymposiumMarch 11-12, 2003
Julie E. RobertsonHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
(313) [email protected]
12
Historically, few physician captives because:
Characteristics of physician practices: No retained earnings/no available capital No “institutional mindset No long term view of insurance
No experience with risk retention Poor access to loss history/data Tail coverage issues Premium deductibility issues
13
“Oh, the times they are a changing”
Different practice models: National provider groups Bigger local groups Employing business/financial professionals Retained earnings and investments
More opportunity for premium deductibility Insurance market, insurance market, insurance
market!
14
Premium Deductibility
June 2001 Rev Proc./Dec 2002 Rulings Abandonment of “economic family doctrine” 2002-89: Single parent captive/90% risk parent/10% risk
3rd parties = No Insurance But 50% risk parent/50% risk 3rd parties = Insurance
2002-90: Single parent captive/12 subsidiaries = Insurance
2002-91: group captive; no one insured more than 15% stock/15% risk = Insurance
15
Premium Deductibility
Rev Proc 2002-75: IRS will now begin issuing private letter rulings regarding tax treatment of captive insurance arrangements
Highly factual; likely expensive and time consuming process
If you have to ask . . .
16
Federal Excise Tax and Reinsurance Transactions
4% direct premium/1% reinsurance premium Not applicable if captive makes a 953(d)
election
17
Premium Deductibility and Security Requirements
Must have “risk” to have insurance Security requirements equal to aggregate
limits can undermine deductibility
18
Why Do Physicians Choose a Fronted Program?
State may require purchase of insurance from approved carriers or for fund participation Example: Pennsylvania/medical malpractice insurance
State regulatory environment or attitude may affect decision
State Department of Insurance may view direct issue captive as transacting insurance within state and attempt to regulate it
19
Why Do Physicians Choose a Fronted Program?
Third party insureds may feel more comfortable with commercial policy
Insureds may be required to maintain insurance from rated carrier or approved carrier under Bond/debt/credit facility covenants Medical staff bylaws Managed care contracts Other contracts
20
HIPAA Privacy Rules
Health Care Providers must ensure the privacy of protected health information shared with their business associates
Impact on fronted captive programs Policy endorsements and required elements Passing the information “down the chain” Can information be redacted?
22
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
By definition, ART Customer is:
Seeking options to conventional insurance and/or 100% risk transfer
Wishes to retain a “predictable” level of risk Seeks to transfer “unpredictable” level of risk: per
occurrence or aggregate Reinsurer usually provides excess coverage
23
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
What we look for……. “Size Matters!”
Single entity or strong affiliation/relationship between members
Commitment to long term risk financing solution Desire and ability to retain an appropriate level of
loss Strong financials
24
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
What we look for……. “Size Matters!”
Commitment and resources to Risk Management/Loss Prevention Program
Creditable historical loss data Competent claims handling via in-house staff or TPA. Clear/unambiguous coverage forms - “clear
understanding of what is covered”
25
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
What we look for……. “Size Matters!” Actuarial Projection of expected losses Acceptable funding mechanism for expected
losses
26
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
Captive documentation Business Plan Articles of Incorporation/Articles of Assoc.. Bylaws Verification of Capitalization Certificate of Incorporation Certified copy of Certificate of Authority (USA) or
Certificate of Registration (offshore)
27
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
Comments on fronting: Rating and viability of front is crucial
Universe of willing fronting companies has shrunk
Front fees vary significantly - policy issuance and required servicing are major factors. Servicing can be done by customer, broker, fronting co. or others
28
Art & Science - A Reinsurer’s Perspective
Comments on fronting: Risk ceded back to customer from fronting co. or
reinsurer usually must be fully collateralized
*some companies require collateralization = to the full aggregate exposure
*others will require collateralization = to expected losses + a provision for adverse development
*acceptable collateralization: ever-green LOC or trust agreement
ART AND SCIENCE
Plus Medical PL SymposiumMarch 11-12, 2003
Seamus TivnanMarsh Management Services Cayman Ltd.
Tel 345 949 7988 Fax 345 949 7849Email [email protected]
30
Art & ScienceCaptive Options
Risk Retention Group Reciprocal Captive Insurer
Pure Group / Association Segregated Cell
Domiciles United States Offshore
31
Art & ScienceWhy Cayman?
Largest Domicile in the World for Healthcare 199 healthcare captives with $1B in premium and
$4.3B in assets First Class Infrastructure Proven Reputation Accessibility Doing Business in Cayman
32
Art & ScienceSo you think you want a captive?
Why? Affordability Availability Accessibility
Or
Attract ability
33
Art & ScienceSo you think you want a captive?
Minimum Size Premium, capital
Costs To consider, establish and operate
Administration Home office, plus Director and Officer obligations
Long term commitment
34
Art & ScienceSo you still want a captive?
The Regulator – that’s the easy part Fronting
Do you need it? Can you find it or even afford it?
Reinsurance Do you need it? Can you find it or even afford it?
Funding It may be more expensive Pay more premium or more capital?
Taxation ‘Exists’ in all domiciles
35
Art & SciencePhysician Groups – Why they do not start and why they fail?
Tax Deductibility & Structure Strength in numbers Segregated Cell Approach Funding – be it premium or capital Funding – retro element, good or bad? Fronting Commitment – to begin and continue Old programs struggle as members leave
36
Art & ScienceCaptive Go Ahead
Timing Select domicile Select partners – actuary, attorney, auditor, banker,
manager, tpa Select Board of Directors File Application – with fee Capitalize Company and hold first meeting