Upload
lmzds
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 1/8
Bringing W ar
Criminals to Justice
A Brief History
1
WOUL
like in this essay to sum up how we got to where we are
now on the question of international justice. As Kenneth Roth
indicates in his introduction, it has essentially been during the
1990s tha t we have tried to hold those responsible for war crimes
actually accountable for their acts. Very little was done before
that, subsequent to the international tribunals at Nuremberg and
Tokyo. There w ere some earlier efforts, however, the most signif
icant of which I believe are one in the mid-1970s and one in the
mid-1980s.
In th e mid-1970s, after seven years of military rule by the
colonels, Greece pu t a nu m be r of those responsible for variotis
atrocities on trial, including two m en who had served as president
of Greece during that period. About a hundred were convicted,
including the two former presidents, for various crimes commit-
ted during the colonels' regime. The n, a decade or so later, in the
mid-1980s, Argentina put on trial a number of the generals and
the admirals responsible for many thousands of disappearances,
torture, and summary executions during the seven years of mili-
tary rule in Argentina.
What happened in Argentina dealt a setback to the effort
internationally to hold those responsible accountable, because
when the effort was made to extend the trials to middle-level offi-
cers,
they rebelled. There were several armed rebellions led by
the mid-level officers, and they were put down by the Argentine
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 2/8
1 08 6 S O C I A L R E S E A R C H
gerous to hold such trials, especially when abuses were committed
by the militar) , beca use the militar\- was cap able of ove rthrow ing
ci\ i l ian governments. Roth referred to the fact that in the south-
em cone of Latin .America, the effort was made to deal with these
issues thr ou gh truth comm issions. In Chile, for exam ple, the deci-
sion was m ad e to avoid trials, to ho n o r an am nest) that th e mili-
tary go ver nm ent s leader. Genera l Augu sto Pinoch et , ha d issued
for himself and for his military cohorts, and instead only to have
a truth commission. There was also a truth commission in
Argentina, but in Chile the commission decided even to avoid
naming any names of the mili tar) officers who had committed
abuse s. You cou ld tell from rea din g th e rep or t issued by the c om-
mission that Pinochet himself
w s
responsible for a large nu m be r
of the abuses, but no one else was identified in the three-volume
document . In another cotmtry neighboring Argent ina, Uruguay,
there was actually a national referendum that decided to uphold
an amnestv rather than risk the possibility of trials that might
cause the military to overthrow a civilian government. So it
looked, for a while, after the Argentine experience, that holding
those who committed great crimes accountable in criminal trials
was doomed.
WTiat changed all that was the war in Bosnia, which began 10
years ago. Bosnia was different, I believe, for thr ee reas ons . First,
of course, the war took place in Europe, fairly close to the center
of Eu rop e, only an ho ur or an h ou r an d a half away by plan e from
a number of the major capitals in Europe. What was going on in
Bosnia had a degree of visibilit) that was not the case when com-
parable atrocities took place in Africa, Asia, or Latin America. A
sec on d factor in m ak ing Bosnia different was tha t m ost of the con-
fiicts subsequent to World War II in which great atrocities took
place w ere in ter na l. T hey w ere civil wars. Bosnia was an inte rna -
t ional armed confl ict , in the sense that three internationally rec-
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 3/8
BRINGING WAR CRIMINALS TO JUST ICE 108 7
conflicts, not in internal armed conflicts. The provisions of the
Geneva Conventions th at dea l with grave breaches, or war crimes,
appear in the sections of the conventions and protocols concern-
ing international armed conflicts. (The law of war has developed
significantly du ring the past decade , and tha t restricted view is no
longer the case.) But in 1992, when the war in Bosnia began, the
fact that this was an international armed conflict made a major
difference when it came to addressing it through a tribunal to
hold accountable those responsible for the crimes carried out.
The third factor that made Bosnia different is that the particu-
lar crimes comm itted there rem inde d us of the crimes comm itted
by the Nazis. And, of course, Nuremberg dealt vsfith the Nazis.
Therefore, the idea of creating an international tribunal pat-
terned on Nuremberg to deal with the crimes committed in
Bosnia seemed app ropria te. Indee d, I can recall at Hum an Rights
Watch issuing a report—the first to acquire any resonance—that
called for the establishment of an interna tional tribunal. Th e rea-
son it created such resonance is that it was issued at the very
moment that news stories started to appear, first reported by Roy
Gutm an in the New York area new spaper
Newsday
on the camps
operated by the Serbs in Bosnia. The camps reminded people of
the Nazis. Therefore the call for an international war crimes tri-
bunal resonated.
Referring to Samantha Power's book,
A Problem from Hell
Ken-
neth Roth points out that establishment of the tribunal was a way
of avoiding military intervention that would have been more
effective in actually stopping the atrocities. That was certainly a
factor. Let me provide one illustration.
After President G eorge H. W. Bush was defeated for reelection
in Novem ber 1992, he
w s
in a sense freed to act on intern ation al
crises that his adm inistration had avoided u p to that po int. In the
electoral cam paign, be was attacked by candidate Bill Clinton for
not attending to domestic affairs. (Recall the slogan of that elec-
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 4/8
1 0 8 8 S O C I A L R E S E A R C H
election pe rio d, a nd th en was defea ted. After his defeat h e was lib-
erated, but there were two major international crises under way at
that moment. One was in Somalia, and the other was in Bosnia.
Apparently, taking ad\ ice th at the U nited States could m ore read-
ily and more easily intervene in Somalia than in Bosnia, President
Bush decided to act in Somalia. But, as a lame duck president, he
could not verv well intervene in two major confiicts at the same
moment. This produced some difficult) for his secretar) of state,
Lawrence Eagleburger, who was particularly associated with
Yugoslavia (he had been the United States ambassador to
Yugoslavia, and was known by some as Lawrence of Yugoslavia).
Eagleburger must have been concemed tha t he would be he ld
accountable for what was taking place in Bosnia. And so in
D ece m be r 1992, after Bush inte rve ned in Somalia, Lawrence
Eagleburger added his voice to the call for an intemational tr i-
bunal for the former Yugoslavia. He proceeded to name 10 peo-
ple ,
including President Slobodan Milosevic , who should be
brought to tr ial before such a tr ibunal. Two months after that, the
U nited N ations Securi ty Coun cil auth or ized the secretar) gene ral
to present a plan for a tr ibunal and then, in May 1993, the UN
Securit) Council approved a specific plan for such a tr ibunal.
When the Bosnia tr ibunal was created, i t inspired a great deal
of cynicism. First, the UN Securit)- Council delayed in appointing
a chief prosecu tor. I t was no t until Justice Rich ard G olds tone was
ap po inte d, som e 14 m on ths af ter the t r ibu nal was created, that a
chief prosecutor was in place to carr) out the decision of the UN
Securit) Cou ncil . Secon d, it ap pea red at that poin t that the Serbs,
who were regarded as responsible for the largest number of
crimes, were the victors in the war, and few could figure out how
those responsible for the crimes would actually be brought to The
Hague , where the t r ibuna l was headquar te red . Indeed when
someone, somewhat accidental ly, was brought to The Hague (a
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 5/8
B R I N G I N G W A R G R IM I N A L S T O J U S T I C E 1 0 8 9
I th ink those cynica l reac t ions undere s t ima ted the m om en tu m
that was building. Here we have to give a great deal of credit to
Just ice Goldstone, because he became a public face for the t r i -
buna l , and he embodied a de te rmina t ion tha t gave people conf i -
den ce tha t the t r ibuna l would am ou nt to something . As on e of
those who was a proponent of the \aew tha t i t would amount to
som ethin g, I have to say that I am astonished by how m uc h i t has
accomplished. There have of course been many difficulties in the
operat ions of the t r ibunals in The Hague and in Arusha (where
the Internat ional Criminal Tr ibunal for Rwanda is located) . They
operate at a painfully slow pace, but when you think it is only a
decade since the start of the Bosnian war, and how lit t le had been
acco m plishe d before that, i t is rem ark ab le tha t the major f igures
responsible for the greatest cr imes that were committed in the
wars in the former Yugosla\ia and in the internal conflict in
Rw anda will be tr ied, if they have no t already be en tiied , by these
tribu nals . W ith all the ir deficiencies, I am con fiden t t ha t the tr ials
will look ver) good in history. They are conducted according to
standards of due process. There are acquit ta ls , but there are a lso
convicdons of crucial f igures in the commission of the crimes in
those confiicts. And it is the experience of the former Yugoslavia
tr ibunal and the Rwanda tr ibunal that has a l lowed a great many
other things to take place. Kenneth Roth refers to a number of
them, such as the t r ibunal for Sierra Leone, the development of
the idea of universal juri sdi ctio n an d, of course, to the establish-
ment of the In te rna t iona l Cr imina l Cour t .
I would add one other development to that l is t . In a number of
countr ies , cr imes that were committed a long t ime ago, which
seemed as though they would go vmpunished, have since then
been punished by nat ional t r ibunals . There are two tr ia ls before
national tr ibunals that seem to me to be especially significant,
both involving cr imes committed dur ing World WW II . I bel ieve
these would not have come about except for the general move-
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 6/8
1O 90 S O C I A L R E S E A R C H
\iction of Maurice Papon in France for crimes against humanitv.
It was only the second time that a French court convicted a
Frenchman for cr imes against humani t ) commit ted during World
War II. In the previous case of Paul Touvier, the French courts
falselv said that his crimes were committed under the direction of
the Nazis, rather than under French direction. In the Matirice
Papon case, the French for the first time faced up to the fact that
cr imes against hum ani tv were com m it ted by a French ma n un de r
French direct ion.
The other case that seems to me even more remarkable is one
that is less known. It is the trial of a man named Dinko Sakic in
Cro atia. Sakic was, as a ver)- you ng m an , th e c om m an d er of a
de ath cam p called Jasenov ac. Outsid e of the Nazi de ath cam ps in
Poland, the leading kil l ing center in Europe during World War II
w
Jase nov ac. Jews, g) psies, an d tens of tho usa nd s of Serbs w ere
gassed or club bed or bu rn ed to de ath in Jasenov ac. No one knows
how many peo ple died the re, tho ug h the usual est imate is in the
neighborhood of 60,000. .\fter \\?orld War II Sakic fied to
A rgen tina. He was fotmd the re and r etu rn ed to Croatia at the
time that President Franjo Tudjman was still alive and still presi-
de nt . It was widely believed tha t Sakic would be given a pro form a
trial. Indeed, that is what took place. The prosecution did veiy lit-
tle in the Sakic case to produce evidence. But under Croatian law
victims may participate in the trial. A group of victims hired a
lavv) er, who pr es en te d a grea t dea l of eviden ce to th e Cr oatia n
court. Even in nationalist (Croatia the court ultimately had no
choice but to convict Sakic, and sentence him to the maximum
term of imprisonment,. Given his age, that means that Mr. Sakic
will die in prison.
I would l ike to suggest that th ere is a mov em ent un de r wa) that
is of enormous significance. We are, I think, still far from the
po in t w hen it is possible to say th at th e effort to d o jus tice in inter -
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 7/8
BRINGING WAR CRIMINALS TO JUST ICE 1091
swiftness of criminal proceedings that actually functions as a
deterrent, the same is true in international trials. We are a long
way from being able to say that those who commit great crimes
will surely be punished for their crimes, and certainly a long way
from being able to say that they will be swiftly punished for their
crimes. Yet I think we are getting to the poin t where the possibil-
y that they may ultimately face justice is beginning to cross the
minds of at least some of those who participate in atrocities. Also,
I think w can be reasonably confident that the movement for jus-
tice will be sustained, if only because there is a substantial inter-
national human rights movement that has penetrated to all but
the most repressive countries on earth. That movement is focused
on this effort to do justice for great crimes. Therefore I expect
that movement to sustain the momentum for justice. That move-
m ent w as responsible for the ratification for the Interna tional
Criminal Court treatv at a much m ore rapid pace than almost any-
one had predicted. If not now, perhaps a decade from now^ or
perhaps two decades from now, I believe we will reach the point
where the availabilit)- of justice in respond ing to war crinaes—to
crimes against humanitv- and to genocide—will actually ftinction
as a deterren t.
8/18/2019 Aryeh Neier - Bringing War Criminals to Justice, A Brief History
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/aryeh-neier-bringing-war-criminals-to-justice-a-brief-history 8/8