1
AO1 The quality of ideas for project and development of these ideas Artist research – the relevance of artists and the quality of analyses AO2 Experimentation with materials and techniques Evaluation of own work AO3 Research into chosen theme Quality of initial and developmental photographs Evaluation of work and progress AO4 Final outcomes Links between own photographs and selected artists LIMITED (1-5 marks) You have obvious and literal ideas. Your project doesn’t have much direction or focus You have hardly any artist research and you use very simple language and no art phrases You don’t really have any experimentation with materials and very little arty or Photoshop based techniques You have no evaluation of own work Your initial photos are weak and unrefined (technically incorrect) You just don’t have enough photographs Your final outcomes are technically weak and you have little consideration for composition and formal elements. There are no proper links between your outcomes and any artists BASIC ( 6-10marks) There Is a sense of order to your project, but your ideas a little repetitive There are a few artist links – but the analysis is very descriptive. You have no analysis of the artists’ ideas, only of technical elements such as lighting & composition and other visual qualities You have some experiments but they are often unrefined and you just repeat the same techniques over and over You have evaluated some of your own work, but they are too short and not in-depth Some of your Initial photos are ok – the formal elements have been considered, but the quality of the photographs are not consistent. There are clearly weak photographs in the set which could have done with some further editing Your final outcomes do show some awareness of composition and F.E. but they also show undeveloped technical skills. It’s not really clear how your final outcomes are linked to any of your artists, COMPENTENT (11-15 marks) Your ideas do follow on from each other, but they are not developed in enough detail. Your final ideas are realised too quickly Your artist research starts to consider complex issues, but your critical vocab lacks depth You have experimented with broad range of media – but sometimes your experiments are a bit predictable Your evaluation does helps your project to develop Most of your Initial photos are competent and well shot – but some of the formal elements are a bit inconsistent. Not all the photographs in your sets are quite up to the same standard Your final outcomes do show a sense of own style & individuality The links between your final outcomes and artists are clear, but they are a bit predictable CONFIDENT (16-20 marks) You have a wide range of ideas, which you have explored independently You have researched many diverse artists and your analyses go into depth about complex issues. Good critical vocab used You have experimented with many diverse materials & techniques, and you have taken risks in your work. All your experiments are properly evaluated and you have refined them All your initial photos are technically strong and the formal elements are consistent. You have made good decisions about what to photograph and you have a strong selection of photos Your final outcomes are very skilful, exciting and show personal identity You have made strong and perceptive links between your own work and the artists MARK out of 80

AS Photography Mark Sheet

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Easy Objectives

Citation preview

Page 1: AS Photography Mark Sheet

AO1

The quality of ideas

for project and

development of

these ideas

Artist research – the

relevance of artists

and the quality of

analyses

AO2

Experimentation

with materials

and techniques

Evaluation of

own work

AO3

Research into

chosen theme

Quality of initial

and

developmental

photographs

Evaluation of work

and progress

AO4

Final outcomes

Links between

own photographs

and selected

artists

LIMITED

(1-5 marks)

You have obvious and

literal ideas. Your project

doesn’t have much

direction or focus

You have hardly any artist

research and you use

very simple language and

no art phrases

You don’t really

have any

experimentation

with materials and

very little arty or

Photoshop based

techniques

You have no

evaluation of own

work

Your initial photos are

weak and unrefined

(technically incorrect)

You just don’t have

enough photographs

Your final outcomes

are technically weak

and you have little

consideration for

composition and

formal elements.

There are no proper

links between your

outcomes and any

artists

BASIC

( 6-10marks)

There Is a sense of order to

your project, but your

ideas a little repetitive

There are a few artist links

– but the analysis is very

descriptive. You have no

analysis of the artists’

ideas, only of technical

elements such as lighting

& composition and other

visual qualities

You have some

experiments but

they are often

unrefined and you

just repeat the

same techniques

over and over

You have

evaluated some of

your own work, but

they are too short and not in-depth

Some of your Initial

photos are ok – the

formal elements have

been considered, but

the quality of the

photographs are not

consistent. There are

clearly weak

photographs in the set

which could have

done with some further

editing

Your final outcomes

do show some

awareness of

composition and F.E.

but they also show

undeveloped

technical skills.

It’s not really clear

how your final

outcomes are linked

to any of your artists,

COMPENTENT

(11-15 marks)

Your ideas do follow on

from each other, but they

are not developed in

enough detail. Your final

ideas are realised too

quickly

Your artist research starts

to consider complex

issues, but your critical

vocab lacks depth

You have

experimented with

broad range of

media – but

sometimes your

experiments are a

bit predictable

Your evaluation

does helps your

project to develop

Most of your Initial

photos are competent

and well shot – but

some of the formal

elements are a bit

inconsistent. Not all the

photographs in your

sets are quite up to the

same standard

Your final outcomes

do show a sense of

own style &

individuality

The links between

your final outcomes

and artists are clear,

but they are a bit

predictable

CONFIDENT

(16-20 marks)

You have a wide range of

ideas, which you have

explored independently

You have researched

many diverse artists and

your analyses go into

depth about complex

issues. Good critical

vocab used

You have

experimented with

many diverse

materials &

techniques, and

you have taken risks

in your work.

All your experiments

are properly

evaluated and you

have refined them

All your initial photos

are technically strong

and the formal

elements are

consistent.

You have made good

decisions about what

to photograph and

you have a strong

selection of photos

Your final outcomes

are very skilful,

exciting and show

personal identity

You have made

strong and

perceptive links

between your own

work and the artists

MARK out of 80