Upload
others
View
14
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1American Segmental Bridge Institute
Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
Fourth Edition, 2012
Benicia Martinez, California Photo Courtesy of T.Y. Lin International
du•ra•bil•i•ty: able to exist for a long time without
significant deterioration
Acknowledgements(Fourth Edition)
The “Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges” 1994, identified 194 structures by type and age, evaluating 96 of these bridges based on bridge inspection reports, and rating
the bridge conditions using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines.
For this fourth report, approximately 460 segmental bridges were identified with data obtained for 363 bridges.
Contributions to the Durability Survey by individuals who were primary authors are acknowledged as follows:
by Brett Pielstick, P.E., Eisman & Russo, Inc.Chair, ASBI Bridge Condition Advisory Committee
Co-Authored by Leo Offredi, P.E., Eisman & Russo, Inc.
© Copyright 1994, 1999, 2008, 2012 by the American Segmental Bridge Institute. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.
Cover Photos: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Tampa Bay, Florida; I-35W, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Benecia Martinez, California; High Five Interchange, US 75, Dallas, Texas; I-64 Kanawha River Bridge, Kanawha County, West Virginia.
ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 1
Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Tampa Bay, Florida. Photo Coutesy of Shutterstock.
Introduction As the name implies, a segmental bridge is a bridge built in short sections (called segments), i.e., one piece at a time, as opposed to traditional methods that build a bridge in very large sections. The bridge is made of concrete that is either cast-in-place (constructed fully in its final location) or precast (built in a pre-cast yard and transported to its final location for placement in the full structure)1.
Some of the primary advantages of segmental concrete bridge construction are the economics2, factory quality in tandem with accelerated construction methods. The inherit repetition and redundancy of segmental construction is key to obtaining higher quality and is considered the original Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) method. Through the use of form-travelers for cast-in-place or the casting machines for precast forms, segmental construction, with its similar or redundant operations associated with these methods, provides efficient production rates and cost savings in the casting and erection operation. The controlled environment of a casting yard for precast segmental bridges provides a factory controlled system with less exposure to the elements, allowing higher production rates and higher quality segments. These improved production methods lead directly to longer lasting durable bridges by extending the service life well beyond the design service life.
The first American Segmental Bridge Institute (ASBI) inventory of concrete segmental bridges built in the United States and Canada was published in 19943. The 1994 survey identified 194 structures by type and age, evaluating 96 of these bridges based on bridge inspection reports, and rating the bridge conditions using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. The 1994 report rated all segmental bridges as fair or better with 98 percent of the bridges rating as satisfactory or better.
Five years later in 19993, ASBI again solic-ited inspection reports from the owners to continue the evaluation of concrete segmental construction. Responses were obtained for 264 bridges, with inspection reports and con-dition ratings for 131 bridges. Again, for the 131 structures where inspection reports were available, all bridges were rated as “fair” or better. Of the 131 bridges, 99 percent had superstructure ratings of “satisfactory” or better, 79 percent had superstructure rates of “good” or better, and 31 percent had super-structure ratings of “very good” or better.
In 20074, ASBI solicited the inspection reports from the FHWA and owners, identifying over 400 bridges, and obtained 275 inspection reports including condition ratings. Again all segmental bridges were rated as “fair” or better. Of the 275 bridges reviewed, over 97 percent had superstructure ratings
of “satisfactory” or better, 85 percent had superstructure ratings of “good” or better, and 25 percent had superstructure ratings of “very good” or better. The average of the 275 seg-mental bridge superstructure ratings included in this report was 7, or “good condition.”
For this fourth report, approximately 460 segmental bridges were identified with data obtained for 363 bridges. Of these 363 structures, with service lives up to 40 years, 95 percent had superstructure ratings of “sat-isfactory” or better, 75 percent had ratings of “good” or better, and 18 percent had super-structure ratings of “very good” or better. The average rating of the representative sample was again found to be 6.9 or in “good condition.” This sampling of segmental bridg-es for 2012 reports 98 percent of the segmental bridges rating as satisfactory or better - which is the same percentage as the first report in 1994.
The findings of this fourth survey, based primarily on 2011 National Bridge Inventory (NBI) inspection reports, again indicates that concrete segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges are performing extremely well com-pared to their contemporaries, with projected service lives well beyond 50 years with minimum future interventions or maintenance required on the bridges.
2 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
I-64 Kanawha River Bridge, Kanawha County, West Virginia.
Photos Courtesy of T.Y. Lin International
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0
5
10
15
20
Cumulative Total of Bridges Built Number Built Per Year
25
30
35
40
45
50
1973
19
74
1975
19
76
1977
19
78
1979
19
80
1981
19
82
1983
19
84
1985
19
86
1987
19
88
1989
19
90
1991
19
92
1993
19
94
1995
19
96
1997
19
98
1999
20
00
2001
20
02
2003
20
04
2005
20
06
2007
20
08
2009
20
10
Cu
mu
lati
ve T
ota
l o
f B
rid
ges
Bu
ilt
Nu
mb
er B
uil
t P
er Y
ear
Year Built
2012 Summary of Bridges Built by Year
Trend Line
Figure 1: Line Graph of Segmental Bridges Inventoried by Year with Cumulative Totals
Segmental Bridge InventoryThe purpose of the ASBI Durability Report is to summarize and quantify the existing con-dition of concrete segmental bridges, which now have service lives of up to 40 years in the United States, and demonstrate that this technology is durable, providing long-lasting structures. ASBI has inventoried segmen-tal concrete bridges by utilizing the FHWA 2011 NBI database5, as well as contacting individual states and agencies for information. Respondents were asked to identify concrete segmental bridges in their jurisdictions and, for each structure, provide the completion date, type of construction, span lengths, roadway width, and total bridge length.
The survey also requested that available bridge inspection reports be returned with the questionnaire.
All of the states and U.S. territories with concrete segmental bridges were represented in the data collected (38 identified).
Figures 1 represents the number of segmen-tal bridges constructed annually for which inspection reports were received for the 2012 Survey. An alphabetical listing of these Segmental bridges by state is included in Ap-pendix A. Appendix B presents a chronological listing based on year of construction.
ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 3
Rating for Concrete BridgesN NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deteriora-tion, spalling or scour.
3
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deteriora-tion, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major dete-rioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service - beyond corrective action.
Table 1: Coding Definitions for FHWA Bridge Condition Ratings5
ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteelSteel ContinuousPrestressedPrestressed Continuous
SegmentalWood and TimberMasonryAluminum and Cast IronOther
Concrete24.45%
ConcreteContinuous
10.69%
Steel17.45%
Steel Continuous7.95%
Prestressed29.46%
Prestressed Continuous
6.50%
Segmental0.11%
Wood and Timber2.85%
Masonry0.01%
Aluminumand Cast Iron
0.38%Other0.15%
Percentage of Bridges Built From 1970
Concrete29.24%
ConcreteContinuous
13.32%
Steel22.42%
Steel Continuous8.21%
Prestressed19.51%
Prestressed Continuous
3.57%
Segmental0.08%
Wood and Timber4.01%
Masonry0.29%
Aluminumand Cast Iron
0.24%Other0.15%
Percentage all Bridges by Type
Figure 2: Bridge Type by Percent of All Bridges in the NBI Figure 3: Bridge Type by Percent of Bridges Built from 1970
BackgroundThe following information is modeled from the December 2011 FHWA NBI Database, documenting the condition of bridges in the United States:
There are 604,426 bridges in the United States (373,670 built from 1970) listed in the 2011 FHWA NBI. Many of these bridges are from 40 to 75 years old and are beginning to show their age, with 69,223 bridges (11.45 percent) rated as structurally deficient. An additional 77,395 bridges are listed as functionally obsolete. The discussion in this survey focuses primarily on structural deficient bridges.
A bridge is classified as structurally defi-cient when it has a rating of poor (4 on the condition rating) or worse for the condition of the deck, superstructure or substructure, or when its load-carrying capacity is significantly below minimum standards. Table 1 presents the coding definitions for the FHWA bridge condition ratings. Replacement of the large backlog of structurally deficient bridges with
bridges, like segmental bridges, that have a long service life, is a desirable goal.
Figure 2 shows the proportion of all bridges, by type, in the 2011 FHWA NBI system. To better compare the performance of segmental bridges to all bridges in the NBI, the data for all the structures built in the past 40 years were broken out and analyzed. Figure 3 shows the proportion by bridge type included in the NBI built from 1970 to present.
Figure 3 shows that all concrete bridge types make up 71 percent of bridges built since 1970 but Figure 4 indicates they represent only 39 percent of the structurally deficient bridges from that same time period. More importantly, for this report, segmental bridges represent 0.12 percent of all bridges built from 1970 yet only represent .08 percent of structurally deficient bridges (Figure 4).
As shown in Figure 2, steel bridges of all types represent 31 percent of the total bridges in the NBI, with Figure 3 showing the percent of steel bridges built since 1970 to be about
4 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
High Five Interchange, US 75, Dallas, Texas.
Photo Courtesy of Texas Department of Transportation
Concrete12.86%
ConcreteContinuous
6.18%
Steel36.76%
Steel Continuous6.58%
Prestressed16.89%
PrestressedContinuous
2.78%
Segmental0.06%
Masonry0.00%
Wood andTimber17.52%
Aluminum andCast Iron
0.33%Other0.04%
Percentage of Structurally De�cient BridgesFrom 1970 by Type
Figure 4: Percentage by Type, Structurally Deficient from 1970
0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteel Continuous
Prestressed Continuous
Steel
Prestressed
SegmentalW
ood and Timber
Aluminum and Cast Iron
Masonry
Other
1.02%
3.28%
0%
23.17%
1.93%1.61%2.16%3.12%
7.94%
2.18%1.98%
Percentage Structurally De�cient in Each Type from 1970
Per
cen
t D
e�ci
ent
in E
ach
Typ
e
Figure 5: Percentage Structurally Deficient in Each Type from 1970
25 percent of all bridge types. Figure 4 shows that 43 percent of steel bridges built since 1970 are structurally deficient. Timber bridges, while representing only 2.8 percent of the structures built since 1970, represent about 18 percent of the structurally deficient bridges on the system during this period.
In this study, seven segmental bridges identi-fied from four different states have been rated as structurally deficient in the 2011 NBI data. The states which have classified the seven seg-mental bridges as structurally deficient include Indiana, Minnesota, Florida and Connecticut. ASBI investigated the root cause of these con-dition ratings which included failure of drain-age systems which allowed de-icing chemical runoff to pond inside the box, resulting in excessive chloride penetration with complete loss of rebar and post-tensioning in Indiana and Minnesota. The structures in Indiana have been closed and will be replaced or taken out of service and the structure in Minnesota is under rehabilitation at this time. In Florida, the low condition rating was due to the substructure rating in a very aggressive marine environment. Recent inspections on some of the countries earliest bridges in the Florida Keys have shown improvement in condition ratings after some
intervention and improvements. In Connecticut, excessive deck cracking has caused deteriora-tion resulting in a low rating.
To better illustrate the percentage of structur-ally deficient bridges in each category, Figure 5 graphically depicts the percentage of struc-turally deficient bridges within each bridge type built since 1970. This chart shows that for each concrete bridge type, about 2 percent are structurally deficient. In comparison, it can also been seen that about 8 percent of steel bridge type and 3 percent of the steel continuous bridge type built since 1970 are structurally deficient.
By definition the functionally obsolete clas-sification means that a bridge fails to meet current design criteria for deck geometry, clearances, or approach roadway geometry or has low appraisal ratings for waterway adequacy or load capacity. For interest, Figure 6 shows the percentage of bridges built since 1970 that are functionally obsolete. Figure 7 shows the functionally obsolete bridges within each bridge type built since 1970.
Figures 8 and 9 depict the percent of deficient bridges either structurally or functionally by type and within each type, built since 1970.
ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 5
Figure 6: Percentage by Type, Functionally Obsolete from 1970
Figure 8: Percentage by Type, Deficient from 1970
Figure 7: Percentage Functionally Obsolete in Each Type from 1970
Figure 9: Percentage Deficient from 1970 within each Type
Percentage of Functionally Obsolete BridgesBuilt From 1970 by Type
Concrete14.28%
ConcreteContinuous
6.03%
Steel26.40%
SteelContinuous
13.24%
Prestressed29.81%
PrestressedContinuous
5.75%
Segmental0.07%
Wood andTimber3.98%
Masonry0.01%
Aluminum andCast Iron
0.26%
Other0.15%
ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteel Continuous
Prestressed Continuous
Steel
Prestressed
SegmentalW
ood and Timber
Aluminum and Cast Iron
Masonry
Other
7.58%
5.17%
15.79%
10.48%
4.41%
6.64%7.60%
12.50%11.36%
4.24%4.38%
0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Per
cen
t o
f Fu
nct
ion
ally
Ob
sole
te in
Eac
h T
ype
Percentage Functionally Obsolete in Each Type from 1970
Concrete13.81%
Concrete Continuous
6.08%
Steel29.86%
SteelContinuous
11.01%
Prestressed25.50%
PrestressedContinuous
4.76%
Segmental0.06%
Wood and Timber8.51%
Masonry0.01%
Aluminum andCast Iron
0.29%
Other0.12%
Summary of De�cient Bridgesby Type From 1970
ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteel Continuous
Prestressed Continuous
Steel
Prestressed
SegmentalW
ood and Timber
Aluminum and Cast Iron
Masonry
Other
0%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
Summary of Percentage De�cient in Each Type from 1970
Per
cen
t D
e�ci
ent
8.61%8.45%
15.79%
6.34%8.26%
9.76%
15.62%
19.30%
6.42%6.37%
33.66%
6 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
71%
39%
56%50%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
All Concrete Type BridgesFrom 1970
Percent of Concrete Structures
to all Bridge Types
Percent of Structurally De�cient Concrete
Bridges to all Structurally De�cient BridgesPercent of De�cient Concrete
Bridges to all De�cient Bridges
Percent of Functionally Obsolete Concrete
Bridges to all Functionally Obsolete
Figure 10: All Concrete Type Bridges from 1970
Figure 13: Segmental Superstructure, Substructure and Deck Condition Ratings from 2011 Data
Figure 11: All Steel Type Bridges from 1970 Figure 12: All Segmental Type Bridges from 1970
25%
43%40% 41%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
All Steel Type BridgesFrom 1970
Percent of Steel Structures
to all Bridge Types
Percent of Structurally De�cient Steel
Bridges to all Structurally De�cient BridgesPercent of De�cient Steel
Bridges to all De�cient Bridges
Percent of Functionally Obsolete Steel
Bridges to all Functionally Obsolete
0.114%
0.058%0.067% 0.064%
0.000%
0.020%
0.040%
0.060%
0.080%
.0100%
0.120%
Comparison of SegmentalBridges From 1970
Percent of Segmental Bridges
to all Bridge Types
Percent of Structurally De�cient Segmental
Bridges to all De�cient Bridges
Percent of De�cient Segmental
Bridges to all De�cient Bridges
Percent of Functionally Obsolete Segmental
Bridges to all Functionally Obsolete
1970-1975
1976-1980
1981-1985
1986-1990
1991-1995
1996-2000
2001-2005
2006-2010
Weighted Average Condition Deck 7.00 6.27 6.46 6.91 6.02 6.88 7.12 7.60 Weighted Average Condition Superstructure 7.40 6.23 5.71 6.66 6.77 7.24 7.04 7.70
Weighted Average Condition Substructure 7.00 6.82 6.50 7.17 7.06 7.12 7.25 7.75
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
Co
nd
itio
n R
atin
g
FHWA 2011 Condition Ratings By Year Built
Trend Lines
Finally, a direct comparison has been made in Figures 10, 11 and 12 of all concrete bridge types, all steel bridge types, and all segmen-tal bridge types showing the percent of each group built from 1970 as it relates to all bridg-es built in that period with the percentage of all structurally deficient bridges, functionally obsolete bridges and percent of all deficient bridges. From these graphs it can be seen in
Figure 10 that the concrete bridges, including segmental, represent a larger proportion of bridges built in this period to the proportion they represent for deficient structures in this category.
Figure 11 shows that steel bridges have a higher percentage of deficient bridges to the total bridges built in their category.
Segmental Bridges represent a small portion of overall structures built but, by proportion, they are shown to be very robust and durable with a much higher percentage of bridges built to percentage of deficient structures in their category.
ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 7
Year Built
No. of Bridges
Condition RatingDeck Superstructure Substructure
4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 91971 01972 01973 1 1 1 11974 3 3 1 2 31975 1 1 1 119761977 13 2 3 8 1 7 4 1 4 91978 4 2 2 1 3 2 1 11979 1 1 1 11980 4 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 11981 6 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 3 11982 4 3 1 2 2 2 21983 10 5 5 4 1 2 3 1 2 71984 7 4 3 3 4 2 51985 1 1 1 11986 19 1 16 2 2 16 1 1 11 71987 3 3 1 2 1 1 11988 17 1 16 1 7 9 12 51989 24 8 14 2 9 15 3 15 61990 2 2 1 1 1 11991 17 7 10 4 12 1 3 9 51992 6 2 3 1 5 1 1 51993 17 1 12 4 1 1 3 12 3 7 71994 5 1 4 1 3 1 1 3 11995 2 2 2 21996 5 5 5 4 11997 7 1 6 4 3 6 11998 14 5 7 2 2 12 10 41999 9 8 1 8 1 1 82000 7 2 5 6 1 72001 16 1 11 4 3 13 1 1 10 42002 46 7 33 5 1 3 11 25 6 1 1 6 28 8 32003 11 1 9 1 9 2 2 6 32004 20 2 14 4 2 13 5 14 5 12005 21 2 10 7 2 12 7 2 9 10 22006 6 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 12007 11 1 4 5 1 1 3 6 1 1 4 5 12008 8 2 6 8 2 62009 10 7 1 2 7 1 2 7 1 22010 5 1 2 2 3 2 2 3Totals 363 6 18 64 221 45 9 5 1 0 1 10 70 204 63 9 0 2 5 39 214 90 13
Averages 6.9 6.9 7.2
Table 2: Summary of Bridge Ratings from Records Received in 2011
Inspection Report SummaryAnalysis of the provided bridge inspection reports utilized the bridge condition ratings defined in the FHWA’s manual, “Recording and Coding Guide for Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges.” In accor-dance with these guidelines, concrete decks are inspected for cracking, scaling, leaching, chloride contamination, pot holing, delamina-tion, and depth failures. Superstructures are inspected for signs of distress due to cracking, deterioration, section loss and malfunction, and misalignment of bearings.
Although the deck of a segmental concrete bridge is integral with the superstructure, it is rated as a deck only, and not as a superstruc-ture member.
Figure 13 summarizes the inspection report re-sults for deck, superstructure and substructure conditions for segmental concrete bridges built in the United States since 1970 and statistically evaluated in five year increments. The structural evaluation rating is an appraisal of the structure’s superstructure, substructure, and inventory load ratings.
The number of segmental bridges built in each year does not always agree with the sum of the bridges receiving condition ratings. Not every bridge is rated in all three categories and an inspection report was not received for every bridge.
The bridge survey ratings, shown in the compilation of NBI data in Figure 13, along with the data shown in Table 2, illustrate that segmental bridges constructed during the past 40 years have a high level of durability.
Overall Bridge Conditions The inspection reports indicate segmental superstructures are performing very well over time, with condition ratings of 5 or above for all but the seven bridges reported as structur-ally deficient. More importantly, 95 percent of the bridge condition ratings are 6 or better and 75 percent of the bridges have condition ratings of 7 or better. The superstructure con-dition ratings of the 363 reported segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges averaged a rating of 6.9.
The older bridges reported in the survey con-tinue to fare well. The oldest bridge, the John F. Kennedy Causeway, completed in 1973, has deck and superstructure condition maintain-ing ratings of 6. This bridge crosses the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and is exposed to an aggressive marine environment. The Califor-nia Pine Valley Bridge, completed in 1974, continues to fare very well with a superstruc-ture condition rating of 7, indicating that this bridge is in very good condition.
The eight Vail Pass bridges in Colorado, completed in 1977, all have superstructure condition ratings of 6 or 7. The Genesee River Bridge in Rochester, New York, a cast-in-place segmental structure completed in 1981, had a condition rating of 8 in 2004. These bridges exist in harsh winter environments with freezing and thawing conditions, coupled with de-icing salt applications. The “satisfactory,” “good,” and “very good” condition ratings for these bridges confirm that prestressed con-crete segmental bridges are high performing in aggressive environments and a preferred solution for a durable and aesthetic structure.
8 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
R,S R(t)
S(t)
Distribution of R(t)
Mean service life
Service life density
Failure probabilityPf
TimeDistribution of S(t)
Targetservice life
R(t) - Resistance Function S(t) – Loading Function
Figure 14: Schematic Illustrating the Concept of Probabilistic Service Life
ConclusionsThe 2011 National Bridge Inventory (NBI) inspec-tion data summarized in this report shows that concrete segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges continue to perform well. This perfor-mance is reflected in the average superstructure condition rating of 6.9 on the NBI scale, indicating good condition. From the 363 segmental bridges of this study, only seven were noted as struc-turally deficient. Bridges constructed during the past 40 years using other materials and methods have experienced a much higher percentage of structural deficiency. In general, the service life of segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges, based on bridge inspection data, exceeds 100 years, providing for low life-cycle costs.
Bridge Wearing Surface SurveyInformation on wearing surface treatments in Appendices A and B of this report indicates that these treatments vary widely from state to state. The American Segmental Bridge Institute recommendations on use of overlays and groov-ing and grinding are summarized below. These recommendations were developed considering experience in construction of segmental concrete bridges over the past 40 years, as well as documented excellent performance of segmental concrete bridge decks.
Additional protection against penetration of chlorides and corrosion of reinforcement is considered to be necessary for all bridge decks exposed to freeze-thaw cycles and application of de-icing chemicals. For all types of segmental bridges (precast or cast-in-place), it is ASBI’s recommendation that this additional protection should be provided by addition of 1 inch or 1½ inches of concrete cover, and that this additional cover should be placed monolithically with the deck concrete. This is considered to be the most economical and most effective means of providing the necessary corrosion protection for segmental bridges in aggressive environments. This procedure also eliminates the possibility of overlay delamination.
It is further recommended that the original superstructure design should allow for future re-moval of the top 1 inch of the deck concrete and
replacement with a new 2 inch overlay (consider future dead load in the design). The need for removal of the top 1 inch of deck concrete, and a new 2 inch overlay, can be based on measure-ment of chloride penetration into the integral overlay. Use of silica fume and other supple-mentary cementitious materials in the concrete mix to decrease permeability has been shown to be an effective means of minimizing chloride penetration into concrete, providing additional durability properties to the structure.
Many precast segmental bridges have been built conforming to normal rideability specifications us-ing the as-cast deck surface as the riding surface. However, requiring an additional ½ inch deck concrete for grooving and grinding is recommend-ed to achieve rideability specifications for either precast or cast-in-place segmental bridges.
The Acosta Bridge in Jacksonville, Florida, a cast-in-place balanced cantilever bridge with a main span of 630 ft., met rideability standards with 3/8 inch provided for grooving and grinding. However, the experience of some bridge owners indicates that ½ inch would not be sufficient for grooving and grinding for cast-in-place balanced canti-lever construction and a larger allowance may be appropriate. For precast balanced cantilever bridges, an allowance of ½ inch for grooving and grinding id considered adequate.
Assessment and Reliabil ityThe service life and reliability of Segmental Bridges can be addressed utilizing two methods, the empirical or probabilistic approach.
For the empirical method Figure 13 (as previously shown on page 6) can be used to predict a theo-retical service life by utilizing the trends or trend lines of the declination rates of these structures. Many of the states utilize trends associated with the deterioration of their structures to predict future inspection, interventions and maintenance needs. From the trend line associated with the condition rating for the superstructures of seg-mental bridges it can be seen that the condition rating of the superstructure declines approxi-mately 1.5 points over 40 years. Based on this performance and noting that a new segmental bridge enters the systems at a superstructure condition rating of 8 or above, a service life of 106 years can be easily interpolated, noting a ser-vice life of 133 years calculated for bridges that enter the system at a condition rating of 9. This average trend line could also be applied to ex-isting structures like John F. Kennedy Causeway
which, at 40 years of age, has a current condition rating of 6. At the current rate, this would indi-cate an additional 53 years of service life before the condition rating reaches a 4 or becomes rated as structurally deficient. It should be noted that the superstructure condition rating for the John F. Kennedy Causeway has not changed over the last five years and has remained at a 6.
The probabilistic6,7 (Figure 14) approach initially is not dependent on the field assessments but relies on the predicted resistance of the materials and systems of an individual structure as compared to the deterioration process of the structures environment (e.g. corrosion of reinforcement, alkali-silica reaction (ASR), etc.). Once the initial predictions are made and plotted, the distribution for the resistance factor and distribution for the environmental deterioration component are applied. As the structure ages these assumptions can be checked, compared, and correlated to make any adjustments to service life calculations.
Since the probabilistic approach to service life de-sign can be addressed during the design phase, it
can be used to adjust cover levels with different blends of material to provide the most econom-ical solution for a given service life. Additional work is now underway to calibrate building codes and specifications to determine the effective service life based on prescriptive cover depths, different binders (portland cement, supplemental cementitious materials such as fly ash, slag, and silica fume), allowable water-cement ratio’s and environmental conditions of the structure.
LIST OF REFERENCES1. Wikipedia – Segmental Bridges - http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Segmental_bridge#History 2. James M Barker, Construction Techniques for Segmen-
tal Concrete Bridges, PCI JOURNAL/July-August 19803. Miller, Maurice, Durability Survey of Segmental
Concrete Bridges, ASBI, 1994, 1999.4. Brett H Pielstick, Durability Survey of Segmental
Concrete Bridges, ASBI 20075. Federal Highway Administration, Recording and Coding
Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges. 1995 Report FHWA-PD-96- 001 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.cfm
6. fib Bulletin 34, Model Code for Service Life Design, Task Group 5.6 Peter Schiessl Convener February 2006.
7. fib Bulletin 59, Condition Control and Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Task Group 5.8 Christoph Gehlen - Convener May 2011
NBI Inspection Data for Concrete Segmental and Cable-Stayed Bridges Listed Alphabetically by State
Appendix A
A1
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
1Al
abam
a12
835
1982
Daulp
hin Is
land
Nov-1
07
66
12
Alab
ama
1543
019
91Co
chra
ne -
Afric
anto
wn
Jan-
116
66
23
Calif
ornia
57-6
92-L
1974
Pine V
alley
EBAu
g-08
78
76
4Ca
lifor
nia21
-49
1977
Napa
Vall
ey ov
er N
apa R
iver
Jan-
007
87
95
Calif
ornia
32c0
076
1978
Parro
ts Fe
rry B
ridge
Four
mile
s sou
th of
rout
e 4Fe
b-10
67
66
6Ca
lifor
nia24
-011
619
78El
Cam
ino A
ve S
acra
men
toDe
c-08
67
76
7Ca
lifor
nia57
c067
619
96M
onte
zum
a Roa
d San
Dieg
oM
ar-1
07
77
08
Calif
ornia
55C0
623
1994
BNSF
Am
trak M
etro
Link
/ El
Paso
Rd
Jun-
087
87
09
Calif
ornia
57 10
5419
92Ro
ute 7
8 San
Ysa
ble C
reek
May
-09
68
74
10Ca
lifor
nia10
0299
20
09SO
UTH
FORK
EEL R
IVER
Ju
l-09
78
70
11Ca
lifor
nia13
C002
220
07GO
ODYE
ARS
CREE
K
Au
g-08
75
70
12Ca
lifor
nia28
0153
R C2
220
07UP
BNS
F AM
TRAK
SUI
SUN
BANo
v-09
78
72
13Ca
lifor
nia30
0053
2009
GARD
NER
LANE
Oc
t-09
78
70
14Ca
lifor
nia30
0054
2009
MUR
PHYS
GRA
DE R
OAD
Oct-0
97
87
015
Calif
ornia
30 00
5520
09PE
NSTO
CK A
QUED
UCT
Oct-0
97
87
016
Calif
ornia
30 00
5620
09AN
GELS
CRE
EK
Oct-0
97
87
017
Calif
ornia
33C0
239R
2009
ARRO
YO D
EL V
ALLE
Oct-0
97
87
018
Calif
ornia
34-0
007L
2008
San F
rans
isco-
Oakla
nd B
ay B
ridge
Sky
way
Jun-
087
87
519
Calif
ornia
34-0
007R
2008
San F
rans
isco-
Oakla
nd B
ay B
ridge
Sky
way
Sep-
087
87
520
Color
ado
F-11-
AK19
77M
iller C
reek
EB I-
70Au
g-08
77
76
21Co
lorad
oF-1
1-AL
1977
Mille
r Cre
ek W
B I-7
0Au
g-08
77
76
22Co
lorad
oF-1
1-AM
1977
Blac
k Gor
e Cre
ek I-
70 EB
Jan-
006
66
623
Color
ado
F-11-
AN19
77Bl
ack G
ore C
reek
I-70
WB
Aug-
087
67
624
Color
ado
F-11-
AU19
77Co
Rd,
Gore
Cre
ek I-
70 EB
Aug-
087
66
625
Color
ado
F-11-
AV19
77Co
Rd,
Gore
Cre
ek I-
70 W
BAu
g-08
77
76
26Co
lorad
oF-1
1-AW
1977
I-70 E
B 13
.5 m
iles J
CT S
H91
Aug-
086
66
627
Color
ado
F-11-
AX19
77I-7
0 WB
9.7 M
iles E
of S
H 24
Aug-
087
77
628
Color
ado
F-07-
AK19
86I-7
0 WBN
DAp
r-08
77
86
29Co
lorad
oF-0
7-AL
1986
I-70 W
BND
Apr-0
87
77
630
Color
ado
F-07-
AN19
86I-7
0 WBN
DAp
r-08
87
76
31Co
lorad
oF-0
8-AA
1986
I-70 A
cces
s Rd G
rizzly
Cre
ekAp
r-08
88
86
32Co
lorad
oF-0
8-AB
1986
I-70 G
rizzly
Cre
ekM
ay-0
87
77
633
Color
ado
F-08-
AV19
89I-7
0 WBN
DAp
r-08
87
76
34Co
lorad
oF-0
8-BH
1989
Frenc
h Cre
ekAp
r-08
77
76
35Co
lorad
oF-0
8-AR
1991
I-70 C
olora
do R
iver /
UP R
RM
ay-0
87
77
636
Color
ado
F-08-
BJ19
93I-7
0 Han
ging L
ake
Apr-0
87
78
637
Color
ado
H-09
-U20
05M
AROO
N CR
EEK
Asp
en
May
-09
88
86
38Co
nnec
ticut
0620
0A19
93Fe
rry R
oad C
onn.
Rive
r NB
I-95
Jul-0
86
56
639
Conn
ectic
ut06
200B
1993
Ferry
Roa
d Con
n. Ri
ver S
B I-9
5Ju
l-08
64
66
40Flo
rida
9000
9419
81US
-1 Lo
ng K
ey
Aug-
097
64
241
Florid
a90
0098
1982
US-1
Cha
nnel
#5Fe
b-09
77
71
42Flo
rida
9001
0119
82US
-1 M
oser
Cha
nnel
Aug-
098
66
143
Florid
a90
0117
1983
US-1
Nile
s Cha
nnel
May
-09
76
71
44Flo
rida
8706
0219
84SR
821 R
amp t
o I-7
5 NB
Sep-
087
77
045
Florid
a87
0643
1986
Ram
p to I
-75 N
BOc
t-08
77
70
46Flo
rida
8706
4419
86I-7
5 NB
to S
R 82
1Oc
t-08
77
70
47Flo
rida
8706
4519
86SR
821 R
amp t
o I-7
5 SB
Oct-0
87
77
0
A2
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
48Flo
rida
8706
4619
86I-7
5 SB
Oct-0
87
77
049
Florid
a87
0647
1986
I-75 N
BOc
t-08
77
80
50Flo
rida
8603
8619
86SR
84 EB
I-59
5/ I-
75 In
terch
ange
Jan-
107
78
051
Florid
a86
0387
1986
I-595
WB
to I-
75SB
Inte
rchan
geJa
n-10
76
70
52Flo
rida
8603
8819
86I-7
5 NB
to I-
595E
B Int
erch
ange
Aug-
096
68
053
Florid
a86
0389
1986
I-75 I
ndian
Trac
e (SW
14)
Oct-0
97
78
054
Florid
a86
0385
1986
I-75S
B to
I-59
5EB
Inter
chan
geJa
n-10
77
70
55Flo
rida
8604
3419
87SB
US-
1 to S
t Lau
derd
ale A
irpor
tM
ar-0
87
77
056
Florid
a86
0510
1988
I-595
WB
to 86
9 NB
Inter
chan
geAu
g-09
77
80
57Flo
rida
8605
1519
8886
9 SB
to I-
75 S
B Int
erch
ange
Aug-
097
68
058
Florid
a86
0516
1988
869 t
o I-7
5 SB
Inter
chan
geFe
b-08
76
70
59Flo
rida
8605
1719
8886
9 SB
to I-
75 S
B 59
5 Int
erch
ange
Aug-
097
77
060
Florid
a86
0518
1988
869 S
b to I
-75 S
B 59
5 Int
erch
ange
Jan-
107
67
061
Florid
a86
0519
1988
I-75 N
B to
869 N
B Int
erch
ange
Aug-
097
78
062
Florid
a86
0520
2002
SB S
R A1
A &
EB S
R 85
8
Apr-0
98
88
063
Florid
a86
0476
1988
US 44
1 NB
to I-
595 W
B Int
erch
ange
Dec-0
97
57
064
Florid
a86
0477
1988
I-595
EB to
SR7
NB
595 I
nter
chan
geDe
c-09
77
70
65Flo
rida
8605
0919
89SB
869 t
o NB
I-75 I
nter
chan
geAu
g-09
77
70
66Flo
rida
8605
1119
89SB
869 t
o EB
I-595
Inte
rchan
geFe
b-08
76
80
67Flo
rida
7205
1819
89Na
poleo
n Bro
war
d Brid
ge (D
ames
Point
)Oc
t-09
76
76
68Flo
rida
8605
1219
89I-7
5 Sb t
o 896
NB
Inter
chan
geFe
b-08
76
80
69Flo
rida
7205
7019
91Ac
osta
Brid
ge S
BAu
g-08
77
70
70Flo
rida
7205
7119
91Ac
osta
Brid
ge N
BJa
n-10
76
70
71Flo
rida
8750
0019
91Po
rt Bl
vd IC
WFe
b-10
77
79
72Flo
rida
8750
0119
91Po
rt Bl
vd IC
WFe
b-10
77
71
73Flo
rida
5700
9119
93SR
293 C
hocta
wat
chee
Bay
Oct-0
87
77
074
Florid
a89
0151
1997
US-1
/ SR
-707
SB
over
St L
ucie
Rive
r - R
oose
velt
Bridg
eJu
n-08
78
70
75Flo
rida
8901
5219
97US
-1 /
SR-7
07 N
B ov
er S
t Luc
ie Ri
ver -
Roo
seve
lt Br
idge
Jun-
087
87
076
Florid
a79
0174
1997
SR 43
9 Sea
bree
ze W
B ov
er IW
COc
t-08
77
70
77Flo
rida
7901
7519
97SR
439 S
eabr
eeze
WB
over
IWC
Oct-0
86
77
078
Florid
a86
0622
1998
17th
Stre
et C
ausw
ay
Aug-
108
88
079
Florid
a86
0623
1998
17th
Stre
et C
ausw
ay
Aug-
108
88
080
Florid
a58
0174
1999
SR 28
1 - G
arco
n Poin
t - S
anta
Ros
a Bay
Brid
geAp
r-09
77
70
81Flo
rida
8901
5820
01SR
A1A
EB ov
er S
t Luc
ie Ri
ver -
Evan
s Cra
ry Br
idge
Jun-
098
78
082
Florid
a89
0160
2001
SR A
1A EB
over
St L
ucie
Rive
r - Ev
ans C
rary
Bridg
eJu
n-09
87
80
83Flo
rida
7901
8720
01US
92 B
road
way
Brid
ge ov
er IW
C W
BM
ar-0
97
77
984
Florid
a79
0188
2001
US 92
Bro
adw
ay B
ridge
over
IWC
EBM
ar-0
97
77
985
Florid
a86
0630
2002
I-595
& U
S 1 t
o Ft L
aude
rdale
Airp
ort
Nov-0
97
88
086
Florid
a86
0631
2002
Entra
nce t
o Ft L
aude
rdale
Airp
ort
Nov-0
97
99
087
Florid
a86
0632
2002
Ft La
uder
dale
Airp
ort t
o I-5
95 &
US
1No
v-09
88
80
88Flo
rida
8606
3320
02Ft
Laud
erda
le Ai
rpor
t Re-
Entry
Ram
pNo
v-09
88
80
89Flo
rida
8606
3420
02Ft
Laud
erda
le Ai
rpor
t Re-
Entry
Ram
pNo
v-09
88
90
90Flo
rida
8606
3520
02Ft
Laud
erda
le Ai
rpor
t Re-
Entry
Ram
pNo
v-09
98
90
91Flo
rida
9304
7720
03I-9
5 SB
to S
R-80
PB In
terch
ange
Dec-0
97
88
092
Florid
a93
0478
2003
SR-8
0 Ram
p NB
I-95 P
B Int
erch
ange
Dec-0
98
88
093
Florid
a93
0479
2004
I-95 S
B to
PBIA
PB In
terch
nage
Dec-0
97
77
094
Florid
a93
0480
2004
PBIA
to I-
95 S
BDe
c-09
77
80
A3
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
95Flo
rida
9304
8120
04I-9
5 SB
to PB
IA PB
Inte
rchna
geDe
c-09
78
80
96Flo
rida
9304
8220
04I-9
5 NB
to PB
IA PB
Inte
rchna
geDe
c-09
88
90
97Flo
rida
9304
8320
04PB
IA R
amp t
o I-9
5 NB
Dec-0
97
78
098
Florid
a93
0484
2004
PBIA
Ram
p to I
-95 S
BDe
c-09
88
80
99Flo
rida
4601
1220
04Ha
thaw
ay U
S 98
Oct-0
97
77
010
0Flo
rida
4601
1320
03Ha
thaw
ay U
S 98
Oct-0
97
77
010
1Flo
rida
1701
7620
03RI
NGLIN
G CA
USEW
AY S
R 78
9 ove
r ICW
Jan-
107
78
010
2Flo
rida
8709
7220
05SR
-25 o
ver O
keec
hobe
e Rd
Nov-1
08
88
610
3Flo
rida
7206
4020
05I-9
5 NB
to I-
295 N
B Ja
x Sou
th In
terch
ange
Ram
p I-2
Apr-0
87
78
010
4Flo
rida
7206
4120
05I-2
95 S
B to
I-95
NB
Jax S
outh
Inte
rchna
ge R
amp H
-1Ja
n-10
77
80
105
Florid
a72
0639
2004
I-95 S
B to
9A Ja
x Sou
th In
terch
ange
Ram
p J-2
Apr-0
87
78
010
6Flo
rida
1502
4420
05CL
EARW
ATER
MEM
ORIA
L CSW
Y. SR
60Ja
n-10
77
70
107
Florid
a10
0800
2006
SR-6
18 (C
ROSS
TOW
N) Le
roy S
elman
Exps
wy
Aug-
087
78
010
8Flo
rida
1008
0620
06SR
618 (
CROS
STOW
N) Le
roy S
elman
Exps
wy
Aug-
087
78
010
9Flo
rida
1008
1220
05CR
OSST
OWN
(SR-
618)
Lero
y Selm
an Ex
psw
yAu
g-08
88
80
110
Florid
a93
0506
2004
Roya
l Par
k Brid
geNo
v-10
88
70
111
Flroid
a93
0507
2004
Roya
l Par
k Brid
geNo
v-10
88
70
112
Florid
a72
0761
2010
I/95 I
-295
Nor
th Fl
yove
rJu
l-10
88
80
113
Florid
a89
0150
2006
Erne
st Ly
ons B
ridge
Ju
n-09
99
90
114
Geor
gia12
7-50
20-0
2002
Brun
swick
- Si
dney
Lanie
r SR
25 (U
S 17
)M
ar-1
17
78
011
5Ge
orgia
051-
0169
-019
91Sa
vann
ah -
Talm
adge
Mem
orial
Brid
ge S
R 40
4 Spu
r (US
17)
Jan-
117
77
011
6Ha
waii
0030
00H3
0200
423
1995
HALA
WA
VAL V
IAD
IBFe
b-09
77
72
117
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0042
419
95HA
LAW
A VA
LL V
IA O
BFe
b-09
77
72
118
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0066
019
94W
INDW
ARD
VIAD
T IB
Feb-
097
77
211
9Ha
waii
0030
00H3
0200
661
1994
WIN
DWAR
D VI
ADT O
B Fe
b-09
77
72
120
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0084
119
96H3
-KAN
EOHE
IC IB
No
v-09
77
72
121
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0084
219
96H3
-KAN
EOHE
IC O
B
Nov-0
97
78
212
2Ha
waii
0030
00H3
0200
843
1996
KANE
OHE I
C RA
MP B
No
v-09
77
72
123
Idaho
0000
0000
0016
896
1991
Benn
ett B
ay B
ridge
Cou
er D
alene
’M
ay-0
96
66
312
4Illi
nois
1010
1331
0666
1980
I-39 &
I-51
SB
Kish
wau
kee R
iver B
ridge
May
-10
66
76
125
Illino
is10
1013
4106
8019
81I-3
9 & I-
51 N
B Ki
shw
auke
e Rive
r Brid
geM
ay-1
06
67
612
6Illi
nois
7501
2222
690
1988
I-72 E
B ov
er Ill
inois
Rive
rAp
r-10
76
79
127
Illino
is75
0123
2371
519
88I-7
2 WB
over
Illino
is Ri
ver
Apr-1
06
67
912
8Ind
iana
6100
176
1975
High
Brid
ge R
d ove
r Sug
ar C
reek
Jul-0
87
88
612
9Ind
iana
4271
519
77I-7
0 WB
Ram
p I-4
65 S
BJu
l-08
55
73
130
Indian
a17
560
1977
SR 47
over
Turke
y Run
Jun-
075
67
313
1Ind
iana
4995
519
77I-7
0 WB
toI-4
65 S
BSe
p-08
66
73
132
Indian
a26
790
1978
US 13
8(SR
26) o
ver W
abas
h Rive
r IL
Nov-0
75
56
313
3Ind
iana
3302
519
83Ra
mp B
over
Con
rail
Jun-
084
16
313
4Ind
iana
3302
619
83Ra
mp -
D EB
over
Rile
y Roa
dJu
n-08
41
73
135
Indian
a33
027
1983
Ram
p C EB
over
Rile
y Roa
dJu
n-08
41
73
136
Indian
a33
028
1983
Ram
p A W
B Ju
n-08
42
63
137
Indian
a33
029
1983
SR 12
over
cana
lJu
n-08
41
43
138
Indian
a49
0023
619
84W
est S
t ove
r IW
C Ca
nal
Sep-
086
67
113
9Ind
iana
4900
217
1986
Indian
a/M
ichiga
n ove
r IW
C Ca
nal
Sep-
087
77
114
0Ind
iana
6683
1992
SR 26
EB ov
er W
abas
h Rive
r, CSX
Dec-0
66
77
314
1Ind
iana
6685
1992
SR 26
WB
over
Wab
ash R
iver, C
SXDe
c-06
67
73
142
Indian
a33
163
2000
SR 91
2 EB
to I-
80 EB
Jun-
096
77
1
A4
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
143
Indian
a33
166
2000
SR 01
2 WB
to I-
80 W
BJu
n-09
67
71
144
Indian
a41
966
2005
I-70 W
BL O
N RA
MP
Aug-
088
88
314
5Ind
iana
4196
820
05I-7
0 EBL
OFF
RAM
P Au
g-08
88
83
146
Indian
a41
972
2005
I-70 E
BL O
N RA
MP
Aug-
088
88
314
7Iow
a25
301
1986
IA 2
over
Miss
ouri
Rive
rOc
t-08
77
84
148
Kent
ucky
037B
0007
4N
19
79E-
W C
onne
ctor -
KENT
UCKY
RIV
ERSe
p-08
77
81
149
Kent
ucky
007B
0013
7N
19
86Sk
yland
Dr. o
ver U
S 25
E M
ay-0
87
76
415
0Ke
ntuc
ky09
8B00
184N
1987
Ram
p B ov
er U
S 23
Feb-
097
78
415
1M
aine
2262
1983
Wisc
asse
t Brid
ge -
Shee
psco
t Rive
r - U
S Ro
ute 1
Nov-1
07
77
315
2M
aryla
nd20
0000
A-C-
0101
019
77Fre
drick
St o
ver U
S 40
and C
SXDe
c-09
76
61
153
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6392
82FD
OTNB
I20
02US
1 R
AMP T
C
Mar
-10
66
73
154
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6392
8DGD
OTNB
I20
02US
1 R
AMP T
C
Jul-0
97
76
315
5M
assa
chus
etts
B163
928Q
GDOT
NBI
2002
US 1
RAM
P TC
Ju
l-09
87
83
156
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6392
8XUD
OTNB
I20
02US
1 R
AMP T
C
Jul-0
97
78
315
7M
assa
chus
etts
B163
928X
WDO
TNBI
2002
US 1
RAM
P TC
M
ar-1
06
66
315
8M
assa
chus
etts
B166
0090
0DOT
NBI
2003
I 93 N
B
Jan-
107
77
315
9M
assa
chus
etts
B166
0090
1DOT
NBI
2002
I 93 N
B
Feb-
107
77
316
0M
assa
chus
etts
B166
009P
MDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP S
A - C
NDe
c-09
77
73
161
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6601
8YW
DOTN
BI20
02I 9
3 SB
Ja
n-10
77
63
162
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6601
8YXD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 SB
M
ar-1
07
67
316
3M
assa
chus
etts
B166
038D
EDOT
NBI
2005
I 93 R
AMP S
ACN
M
ar-1
06
77
316
4M
assa
chus
etts
B166
038D
FDOT
NBI
2005
I 93 R
AMP S
ACN
M
ar-1
06
77
316
5M
assa
chus
etts
B166
039P
FDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP S
A-CN
M
ar-1
06
77
316
6M
assa
chus
etts
B166
068Y
UDOT
NBI
1999
I 93 R
AMP N
S
May
-10
77
63
167
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6607
8YPD
OTNB
I19
99I 9
3 RAM
P SN
Ju
n-09
87
73
168
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6610
8Y6D
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP C
T
Mar
-10
66
73
169
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6610
8YCD
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP C
T
Jun-
098
78
317
0M
assa
chus
etts
B166
108Y
DDOT
NBI
2001
US 1
RAM
P CT
Ju
n-09
77
73
171
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6610
8YFD
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP C
T
Mar
-10
76
73
172
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6611
8XYD
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP S
T
Jun-
098
77
317
3M
assa
chus
etts
B166
118Y
3DOT
NBI
2001
US 1
RAM
P ST
M
ay-1
07
77
317
4M
assa
chus
etts
B166
569A
JDOT
NBI
2000
I 93 S
B
Feb-
117
77
317
5M
assa
chus
etts
B166
569N
3DOT
NBI
2000
I 93 S
B
Apr-0
97
77
317
6M
assa
chus
etts
B166
569Q
6DOT
NBI
2000
I 93 S
B
Jun-
097
77
317
7M
assa
chus
etts
B166
569Q
7DOT
NBI
2000
I 93 S
B
Apr-0
97
77
317
8M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589B
0DOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Jan-
106
67
317
9M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589Q
WDO
TNBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Dec-0
97
77
318
0M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589Q
XDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Dec-0
97
77
318
1M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589Q
YDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Dec-0
97
77
318
2M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589R
MDO
TNBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Jan-
107
77
318
3M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589R
NDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Jan-
107
77
318
4M
assa
chus
etts
B166
5982
NDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP X
X
Jan-
106
55
318
5M
assa
chus
etts
B166
598M
DDOT
NBI
2001
I 93 R
AMP X
X
Jan-
107
66
318
6M
assa
chus
etts
B166
599Q
5DOT
NBI
2005
COM
B I9
0&I93
RMP L
L&AM
TK I
93 R
AMP X
X M
ar-1
17
78
918
7M
assa
chus
etts
B166
618Q
XDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 N
B
Jun-
097
77
318
8M
assa
chus
etts
B166
618Q
YDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 N
B
Apr-0
97
67
318
9M
assa
chus
etts
B166
618R
0DOT
NBI
2002
I 93 N
B
Mar
-10
66
63
190
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
8TM
DOTN
BI20
02I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ja
n-10
76
73
A5
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
191
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
8TPD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ap
r-09
77
73
192
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
8TTD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ap
r-09
77
83
193
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
9Q3D
OTNB
I20
06I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ju
n-10
66
73
194
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
9UTD
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ju
n-10
77
73
195
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
9V0D
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ju
n-10
76
73
196
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
9Q4D
OTNB
I20
05CO
MB
I90&
I93RM
P LL&
AMTK
I 93
RAM
P K
Mar
-11
77
79
197
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6665
9AYD
OTNB
I20
03I 9
3 RAM
P AS
Fe
b-10
77
73
198
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6666
9QRD
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P FX
M
ar-1
07
77
319
9M
assa
chus
etts
B166
688M
CDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP X
XE
Dec-0
97
77
320
0M
assa
chus
etts
B166
6982
HDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 H
OV R
AMP E
B Ju
n-10
65
73
201
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6669
82JD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 HOV
RAM
P EB
Jan-
107
77
320
2M
assa
chus
etts
B166
708T
WDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP K
K
Mar
-10
66
73
203
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6670
9URD
OTNB
I20
03I 9
3 RAM
P KK
Ju
n-09
77
73
204
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6671
8TLD
OTNB
I20
01I 9
3 RAM
P MW
Apr-0
97
77
320
5M
assa
chus
etts
B166
719P
WDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP M
W
Ju
n-09
77
73
206
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6676
9QLD
OTNB
I20
03I 9
3 RAM
P CC
Ju
l-10
77
73
207
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6681
82PD
OTNB
I20
02CO
MB
I90 R
PS&H
OV&A
MTK
HW
Y F
RONT
AGE R
DJu
n-09
77
73
208
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6681
8QVD
OTNB
I20
02HW
Y F
RONT
AGE R
D M
ar-1
17
67
320
9M
assa
chus
etts
B166
828M
5DOT
NBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP L
L
Dec-1
06
57
321
0M
assa
chus
etts
C010
498Y
HDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP T
S
Apr-1
07
76
321
1M
ichiga
n54
1540
1400
0B01
019
83US
-131
SB
5 mi S
outh
Big
Rapid
sM
ay-1
07
67
212
Mich
igan
5415
4014
000B
020
1982
US-1
31 N
B 5 m
i Sou
th B
ig Ra
pids
May
-10
77
721
3M
ichiga
n73
1731
1200
0B03
119
80I-7
5 NB
At Zi
lwau
kee
Oct-0
96
77
214
Mich
igan
7317
3112
000B
032
1984
I-75 S
B at
Zilw
auke
eOc
t-09
67
721
5M
ichiga
n73
1731
1200
0B03
819
84I-7
5 SB
RAM
P at Z
ilwau
kee
Oct-0
97
77
216
Mich
igan
8218
2022
000S
436
1984
M-3
9 SB
RAM
P K in
Alle
n Par
kAu
g-10
77
621
7M
innes
ota
2740
920
08Sa
int A
ntho
ny Fa
lls B
ridge
New
I-35
W S
B
Oct-1
18
88
221
8M
innes
ota
2741
020
08Sa
int A
ntho
ny Fa
lls B
ridge
New
I-35
W N
B
Oct-1
18
88
221
9M
innes
ota
2761
119
80Ply
mou
th A
venu
eNo
v-11
71
85
220
Minn
esot
a62
555A
1998
Wab
asha
Stre
et N
BAu
g-11
78
84
221
Minn
esot
a62
555B
1998
Wab
asha
Stre
et S
BSe
p-11
78
84
222
Minn
esot
a82
856
2006
I-494
WB
Oct-1
18
88
422
3M
innes
ota
8285
520
10I-4
94 EB
Oct-1
18
88
422
4M
innes
ota
27V6
520
07M
N 12
1 NB
Apr-1
19
99
422
5M
innes
ota
27V6
620
07I-3
5W R
amp
Aug-
118
88
422
6M
innes
ota
27V7
320
07I-3
5W R
amp
Aug-
118
88
422
7M
innes
ota
27V7
520
08I-3
5W R
amp
Aug-
118
88
422
8M
innes
ota
27V7
620
08TH
62 W
BAu
g-11
88
84
229
Minn
esot
a27
V79
2008
I-35W
Ram
pAu
g-11
88
84
230
Miss
issipp
i11
0011
0024
0001
019
88I-1
10 ov
er R
R an
d Kee
gan B
atou
Dec-0
97
77
123
1M
ississ
ippi
1700
1100
2400
00A
1988
I-110
Inne
r Loo
p ove
r US
90De
c-09
77
71
232
Miss
issipp
i17
0011
0024
0000
B19
88I-1
10 O
uter
Loop
over
US
90De
c-09
77
71
233
Miss
issipp
i17
0011
0024
0008
A19
88I-1
10 O
ff Ra
mp o
ver D
ivisio
n St
Dec-0
97
78
123
4M
ississ
ippi
1700
1100
2400
08B
1988
I-110
On R
amp o
ver D
ivisio
n ST
Dec-0
97
78
123
5M
ississ
ippi
3100
6130
3000
450
1987
SR 61
3 Esc
ataw
pa R
ierAu
g-08
76
69
236
Miss
issipp
i55
7048
3P00
0000
020
01Na
tches
Trac
e Par
kway
- FH
WA
Dec-0
87
77
123
7M
ississ
ippi
SA43
0000
0000
051
2008
Lazy
Roa
dNo
v-09
88
81
238
Miss
ouri
2575
1981
IS-1
70 E
to IS
-70 E
Oct-1
07
66
0
A6
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
239
Miss
ouri
1213
219
99Cr
eve C
oeur
Lake
Brid
ge A
SBI 2
000 E
rnes
t Pet
zoid
Aug-
107
77
024
0M
issou
ri33
066
2010
MIS
SISS
IPPI R
VR, N
. BRO
A (Pr
estre
ssed
Con
crete
App
roac
h) St
eel C
ont.
Jun-
107
99
024
1M
issou
ri34
9319
85US
24 W
MIS
SISS
IPPI R
VRAu
g-10
66
60
242
Miss
ouri
3497
1994
US 67
S -
RRJu
n-10
67
50
243
Miss
ouri
4089
1997
MO
34 E
- AQU
Mar
-10
78
70
244
Miss
ouri
3285
420
10IS
29 S
- Le
vee
Jan-
109
99
024
5Ne
bras
kaS0
02 50
816
1983
N2 ov
er th
e Miss
ouri
Rive
rOc
t-08
77
74
246
Neva
da
0305
-B18
6819
92Ho
over
Dam
Byp
ass
Oct-0
95
77
624
7Ne
vada
I 214
119
99Ra
mp I
-15 S
to 95
E Sp
aghe
tti In
terch
nage
Feb-
097
77
124
8Ne
vada
I 939
1999
Ram
p US
95 S
W to
I-15
S S
pagh
etti
Inter
chan
geJa
n-09
77
71
249
Neva
daI 9
4019
99I01
5 Ram
p NW
Spa
ghet
ti Int
erch
ange
Jan-
097
77
125
0Ne
vada
I 904
R19
99Ra
mp N
MLK
Blvd
Spa
ghet
ti Int
erch
ange
Jan-
097
77
125
1Ne
w M
exico
0000
0000
0009
954
2002
I-25 N
B to
I-40
WB
Big I
Inte
rchan
geNo
v-09
77
71
252
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
520
02I-2
5 SB
to I-
40 W
B Bi
g I In
terch
ange
Nov-0
97
67
125
3Ne
w M
exico
0000
0000
0009
957
2002
I-40 W
B to
I-25
SB
Big I
Inte
rchna
geOc
t-09
77
71
254
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
820
02I-2
5 SB
to I-
40 EB
Big
I Inte
rchan
geOc
t-09
77
75
255
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
920
02I-2
5 NB
to I-
40 EB
Big
I Inte
rchan
geNo
v-09
77
71
256
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0996
020
02I-4
0 EB
Ram
p to I
-25 S
B Bi
g I In
terch
nage
Nov-0
97
77
125
7Ne
w M
exico
0000
0000
0009
961
2002
I-40 E
B Ra
mp t
o I-2
5 NB
Big I
Inte
rchna
geNo
v-09
77
71
258
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0996
220
02I-4
0 Wb R
amp t
o I-2
5 NB
Big I
Inte
rchna
geNo
v-09
77
71
259
New
Jersy
1223
150
2005
Victo
ry Br
dge -
Rar
itan R
iver N
J-35
Sep-
097
77
126
0Ne
w Je
rsy13
1516
920
09Sh
rew
sbur
y Rive
r - N
J-36
Dec-0
99
99
626
1Ne
w Yo
rk40
7054
119
81I-3
90 ov
er G
enes
see R
iver
Jul-1
07
78
3226
2Ne
w Yo
rk40
7054
219
81I-3
90 ov
er G
enes
see R
iver
Oct-1
08
77
3226
3Ne
w Yo
rk10
7556
920
01M
R 14
C ov
er R
TE I-
278 &
Mar
cy A
veSe
p-10
77
82
264
New
York
1060
919
2009
Brya
nt A
ve H
emps
tead
Ha
Rt 25
ADe
c-10
99
92
265
New
York
1093
850
1974
Sprin
g Stre
et PE
D OV
P 490
IAp
r-10
78
71
266
New
York
2266
590
1994
Nepp
erha
n Ped
BDG
over
Nep
perh
an A
veAp
r-11
75
81
267
North
Car
olina
5140
182P
0000
000
1983
Viad
uct (
Linn C
ove)
Blue
Ridg
e Par
kway
Jun-
097
77
626
8No
rth C
aroli
na13
7001
519
97NC
33 O
ver I
CW -
Croa
tan S
ound
Brid
ge
Sep-
097
78
126
9No
rth C
aroli
na18
7001
520
01NC
32 ov
er A
lbem
arle
Soun
dSe
p-09
77
56
270
North
Car
olina
1290
103
2007
Cape
Fear
Rive
r - I-
140 /
US-
17 B
ypas
sJu
n-08
77
72
271
North
Car
olina
6800
15 19
97Ho
buck
enSe
p-11
77
71
272
North
Car
olina
6401
03 20
07W
ilming
ton B
ypas
sJu
n-10
77
62
273
North
Car
olina
9300
1519
90 A
lbem
arle
Soun
dAu
g-11
77
56
274
Oklah
oma
0659
2000
0000
000
1999
US 59
over
Gra
nd La
ke -
Sailb
oat B
ridge
No
v-10
78
70
275
Oklah
oma
2479
1000
0000
000
2000
US 59
over
Gra
nd La
ke -
Sailb
oat B
ridge
Nov-1
07
87
027
6Oh
io20
3127
220
05I-2
80 V
eter
ans G
lass C
ity S
kyw
ay -
Mau
mee
Rive
r Brid
geDe
c-09
99
92
277
Oreg
on16
424 0
70 00
040
1988
COLU
MBI
A RI
VER
I-82
(Hw
y 070
) WB
Mar
-08
76
73
278
Oreg
on19
739 0
01 12
057
2007
S UM
PQUA
R &
COR
P I-5
(Hw
y 001
) SB
Nov-0
68
88
027
9Or
egon
26T0
9 000
0000
019
78SO
UTH
UMPQ
UA R
IVER
Ste
war
t Par
kway
Jun-
095
78
128
0Pe
nnsly
vania
6670
7699
0245
720
2007
Susq
uhan
na B
ridge
Turn
pike (
I-76)
May
-08
88
81
281
Penn
slyva
nia66
7076
9902
4573
020
07Su
squh
anna
Brid
ge Tu
rnpik
e (I-7
6)M
ay-0
88
88
128
2Pe
nnsly
vania
02 70
76 99
00 48
00
Alleg
heny
Rive
r Brid
ge EB
28
3Pe
nnsly
vania
02 70
76 99
00 48
01
Alleg
heny
Rive
r Brid
ge W
B 28
4Pu
erto
Rico
1982
119
92PR
10 ov
er G
agua
nas R
iver
Mar
-07
77
71
285
Rhod
e Isla
nd80
0019
92RI
138 o
ver W
est P
assa
ge N
arra
Bay
Mar
-10
57
53
286
Sout
h Car
olina
1010
5264
2400
1989
Wan
do R
iver B
ridge
Mar
-10
66
61
A7
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
287
Sout
h Car
olina
1010
5262
2500
1989
Wan
do R
iver B
ridge
Mar
-10
66
61
288
Sout
h Car
olina
1040
0030
0010
019
93As
hley R
iver C
harle
ston C
IPNo
v-08
66
61
289
Sout
h Car
olina
1020
0017
0090
020
05Ar
thur
Rav
enel
Jr. B
ridge
Oct-0
88
88
329
0So
uth D
akot
a23
0462
0320
05Fo
ur B
ears
Bridg
eNo
v-09
99
929
1Te
xas
1202
0005
8701
005
2003
GULF
-INTR
ACOA
STAL
WTR
WAY
76
129
2Te
xas
1210
2032
5603
075
1980
HOUS
TON
SHIP
CHAN
NEL
76
129
3Te
xas
1422
7000
1513
471
1998
IH 35
N &
S B
OUND
87
229
4Te
xas
1422
7000
1513
472
1998
IH-3
5 N&S
BOU
ND8
72
295
Texa
s14
2270
0151
0608
019
98OH
LEN
RD &
LOCA
L STR
EETS
87
229
6Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
081
1998
OHLE
N RD
& LO
CAL S
TREE
TS8
72
297
Texa
s14
2270
0151
0609
319
98US
183 N
B EN
T RAM
P8
72
298
Texa
s14
2270
0151
0609
419
98US
183 S
B EX
IT RA
MP
87
229
9Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
102
1998
US 18
3 & IH
35 M
AINL
ANE
87
230
0Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
103
1998
IH35
SB
FTG
RD8
72
301
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1033
719
89HO
USTO
N ST
TO EL
PASO
ST
77
230
2Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
338
1991
EL PA
SO S
T TO
HOUS
TON
ST7
72
303
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1033
919
89GU
ADAL
UPE S
T TO
S LA
REDO
67
230
4Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
340
1993
S LA
REDO
ST T
O GU
ADAL
UPE
67
230
5Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
341
1991
PARK
ING
AREA
77
230
6Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
342
1991
PARK
ING
AREA
76
230
7Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
344
1989
PECO
S ST
SB
77
230
8Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
345
1991
R.O.
W. S
OF D
URAN
GO B
LVD
88
230
9Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
346
1991
R.O.
W. N
OF D
URAN
GO B
LVD
68
231
0Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
347
1989
IH 35
ON-
RP &
GUA
DALU
PE7
72
311
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
819
89R.
O.W
. NEA
R LE
ONA/
FRT.R
D7
82
312
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
919
89R.
O.W
. N O
F S LA
REDO
78
231
3Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
350
1991
R.O.
W. N
OF W
CEV
ALLO
S7
82
314
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1035
119
91R.
O.W
. N O
F ALA
MO
ST7
82
315
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1035
619
89CA
MDE
N - Q
UINC
Y ST
67
231
6Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
357
1993
CAM
DEN
ST TO
N S
T MAR
YS7
72
317
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1035
819
89N
FLOR
ES-N
ST.
MAR
Y’S
ST7
72
318
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1035
919
93SA
N PE
DRO
TO B
ROOK
LYN
AV7
72
319
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
019
93N
ST M
ARY’
S ST
77
232
0Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
361
1993
R.O.
W. W
OF N
ST.
MAR
Y’S
77
232
1Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
362
1989
R.O.
W. N
EAR
ERIE
AVE.
78
232
2Te
xas
1422
70AA
1856
001
1986
Barto
n Cre
ek
77
323
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
319
89R.
O.W
. NEA
R BA
LTIM
ORE A
V7
72
324
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
419
93AT
LANT
A ST
& E
ELM
IRA
ST7
82
325
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
519
93IH
35 S
B OF
F RAM
P7
82
326
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1220
519
93W
MAG
NOLIA
TO N
FRIO
ST
67
232
7Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
206
1989
LOW
ER LE
VEL
67
232
8Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
207
1993
WOO
DLAW
N AV
E7
82
329
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1220
819
93N
TRIN
ITY-IH
10 O
N RA
MP
78
233
0Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
209
1993
R.O.
W. S
OF C
ULEB
RA7
82
331
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1221
019
93W
POPL
AR S
T7
82
332
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1221
119
89R.
O.W
. N O
F CUL
EBRA
78
133
3Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
212
1989
R.O.
W. S
OF C
ULEB
RA7
72
A8
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
Alp
hab
etic
ally
by
Sta
te20
12 C
ondi
tion
Surv
ey
No.
Stat
eBr
idge
Num
ber
Year
Bu
iltN
ame
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
Dec
k
Con
ditio
nSu
pers
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Subs
truc
ture
C
ondi
tion
Surf
ace
Type
334
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1234
319
91R.
O.W
. S O
F W M
ARTIN
78
233
5Te
xas
1617
8006
1702
026
1973
GULF
-INTR
ACOA
STAL
WTR
WAY
66
233
6Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
479
2003
IH 63
5/US
75 IN
TERC
HANG
E - H
igh F
ive7
71
337
Texa
s18
0570
2374
0148
020
03IH
635/
US 75
INTE
RCHA
NGE -
High
Five
76
133
8Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
474
2005
IH 63
5/US
75 R
AMPN
E - H
igh Fi
ve In
terch
ange
77
339
Texa
s18
0570
2374
0147
720
05IH
635/
US75
RAM
PSW
- High
Five
Inte
rchan
ge7
734
0Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
482
2005
IH63
5 HOV
FLYO
VER-
High
Five
Inte
rchan
ge7
734
1Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
465
2005
HOV
T-RAM
P IH
635 W
B7
734
2Te
xas
1208
5005
0001
373
2006
IH 45
NB
- Galv
esto
n Bay
77
343
Texa
s12
0850
0500
0137
420
07IH
45 S
B - G
alves
ton B
ay7
734
4Te
xas
2012
4003
0603
030
1991
NECH
ES R
IVER
77
234
5Te
xas
2003
6005
0802
179
2009
Trinit
y Rive
r IH
10 W
B7
734
6Te
xas
1315
8006
0401
004
2000
9FM
2031
Inte
rcoas
tal W
ater
way
88
347
Texa
s12
0200
0586
0101
319
98Su
rfside
/ SH
332 I
nter
coas
tal C
anal
77
348
Virg
inia
2139
019
89Be
lvide
re S
t ove
r 2nd
Jam
es R
iver
Jun-
117
66
334
9Vi
rgini
a10
007
1990
Jam
es R
iver -
Rou
te 29
5 (Va
rina-
Enon
Brid
ge)
May
-11
75
60
350
Virg
inia
2729
320
02Po
caho
ntas
Pky E
B ov
er Ja
mes
Rive
rSe
p-10
76
73
351
Virg
inia
2729
420
02Po
caho
ntas
Pky W
B ov
er Ja
mes
Rive
rSe
p-10
77
73
352
Virg
inia
2729
520
02Fa
lling C
reek
Ram
ps -
Ram
p E 0f
I-95
NBL
Sep-
107
66
135
3Vi
rgini
a27
296
2002
Rmp A
150 &
Dup
ont R
amp H
of 89
5 WBL
Aug-
107
77
135
4Vi
rgini
a27
297
2002
Rmp 8
95 &
Ram
ps 0f
150 R
amp G
of 89
5 WBL
Aug-
107
77
135
5Vi
rgini
a25
584
2001
Smar
t Brid
ge R
oute
723 -
Wils
on C
reek
Nov-0
97
77
335
6W
ashin
gton
0010
200A
0000
000
1981
I-90 o
ver D
eny C
reek
Oct-0
86
67
335
7W
ashin
gton
0012
042A
0000
000
1984
182/
16N
over
Colu
mbia
Rive
rM
ay-1
06
67
335
8W
ashin
gton
0012
4042
B000
000
1984
182/
16S
over
Colu
mbia
Rive
rM
ay-1
06
66
335
9W
ashin
gton
0012
819A
0000
000
1988
I-82 o
ver C
olum
bia R
iver @
Ore
gon L
ineM
ar-1
07
67
336
0W
ashin
gton
0012
833A
0000
000
1989
Lake
Was
hingt
on R
ev I-
90Au
g-09
77
73
361
Was
hingt
on00
1283
3B00
0000
019
89La
ke W
ashin
gton
WB
I-90
Aug-
097
77
336
2W
ashin
gton
0014
409B
0000
000
1996
SR 50
9 ove
r Rve
r, RR
& Po
rtlan
d Ave
Sw
ing B
ridge
Jun-
107
77
336
3W
est V
irgini
a00
0000
0002
0A84
220
10I-6
4 EB
Kana
wha
Rive
r Brid
ge40
773
98
93
NBI Inspection Data for Concrete Segmental and Cable-Stayed Bridges Listed Chronologically by Year Built
Appendix B
B1
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
11
Texa
s16
1780
0617
0202
619
73GU
LF-IN
TRAC
OAST
AL W
TRW
AY6
62
22
Calif
ornia
57-6
92-R
1974
Pine V
alley
WB
Aug-
087
77
63
3Ca
lifor
nia57
-692
-L19
74Pin
e Vall
ey EB
Aug-
087
87
64
4Ne
w Yo
rk10
9385
019
74Sp
ring S
treet
PED
OVP 4
90I
Apr-1
07
87
15
5Ind
iana
6100
176
1975
High
Brid
ge R
d ove
r Sug
ar C
reek
Jul-0
87
88
66
1Ca
lifor
nia21
-49
1977
Napa
Vall
ey ov
er N
apa R
iver
Jan-
007
87
97
2Co
lorad
oF-1
1-AK
1977
Mille
r Cre
ek EB
I-70
Aug-
087
77
68
3Co
lorad
oF-1
1-AL
1977
Mille
r Cre
ek W
B I-7
0Au
g-08
77
76
94
Color
ado
F-11-
AM19
77Bl
ack G
ore C
reek
I-70
EBJa
n-00
66
66
105
Color
ado
F-11-
AN19
77Bl
ack G
ore C
reek
I-70
WB
Aug-
087
67
611
6Co
lorad
oF-1
1-AU
1977
Co R
d, Go
re C
reek
I-70
EBAu
g-08
76
66
127
Color
ado
F-11-
AV19
77Co
Rd,
Gore
Cre
ek I-
70 W
BAu
g-08
77
76
138
Color
ado
F-11-
AW19
77I-7
0 EB
13.5
mile
s JCT
SH9
1Au
g-08
66
66
149
Color
ado
F-11-
AX19
77I-7
0 WB
9.7 M
iles E
of S
H 24
Aug-
087
77
615
10Ind
iana
4271
519
77I-7
0 WB
Ram
p I-4
65 S
BJu
l-08
55
73
1611
Indian
a17
560
1977
SR 47
over
Turke
y Run
Jun-
075
67
317
12Ind
iana
4995
519
77I-7
0 WB
toI-4
65 S
BSe
p-08
66
73
1813
Mar
yland
2000
00A-
C-01
010
1977
Fredr
ick S
t ove
r US
40 an
d CSX
Dec-0
97
66
119
14Ca
lifor
nia32
c007
619
78Pa
rrots
Ferry
Brid
ge Fo
ur m
iles s
outh
of ro
ute 4
Feb-
106
76
620
15Ca
lifor
nia24
-011
619
78El
Cam
ino A
ve S
acra
men
toDe
c-08
67
76
2116
Indian
a26
790
1978
US 13
8(SR
26) o
ver W
abas
h Rive
r IL
Nov-0
75
56
322
17Or
egon
26T0
9 000
0000
019
78SO
UTH
UMPQ
UA R
IVER
Ste
war
t Par
kway
Jun-
095
78
123
18Ke
ntuc
ky03
7B00
074N
1979
E-W
Con
necto
r -KE
NTUC
KY R
IVER
Sep-
087
78
124
19Illi
nois
1010
1331
0666
1980
I-39 &
I-51
SB
Kish
wau
kee R
iver B
ridge
May
-10
66
76
2520
Mich
igan
7317
3112
000B
031
1980
I-75 N
B At
Zilw
auke
eOc
t-09
67
726
21M
innes
ota
2761
119
80Ply
mou
th A
venu
eNo
v-11
71
85
CIP
2722
Texa
s12
1020
3256
0307
519
80HO
USTO
N SH
IP CH
ANNE
L7
61
281
Florid
a90
0094
1981
US-1
Long
Key
Au
g-09
76
42
292
Illino
is10
1013
4106
8019
81I-3
9 & I-
51 N
B Ki
shw
auke
e Rive
r Brid
geM
ay-1
06
67
630
3M
issou
ri25
7519
81IS
-170
E to
IS-7
0 EOc
t-10
76
60
314
New
York
4070
541
1981
I-390
over
Gen
esse
e Rive
rJu
l-10
77
832
325
New
York
4070
542
1981
I-390
over
Gen
esse
e Rive
rOc
t-10
87
732
336
Was
hingt
on00
1020
0A00
0000
019
81I-9
0 ove
r Den
y Cre
ekOc
t-08
66
73
347
Alab
ama
1283
519
82Da
ulphin
Islan
dNo
v-10
76
61
358
Florid
a90
0098
1982
US-1
Cha
nnel
#5Fe
b-09
77
71
369
Florid
a90
0101
1982
US-1
Mos
er C
hann
elAu
g-09
86
61
3710
Mich
igan
5415
4014
000B
020
1982
US-1
31 N
B 5 m
i Sou
th B
ig Ra
pids
May
-10
77
738
11Flo
rida
9001
1719
83US
-1 N
iles C
hann
elM
ay-0
97
67
139
12Ind
iana
3302
519
83Ra
mp B
over
Con
rail
Jun-
084
16
340
13Ind
iana
3302
619
83Ra
mp -
D EB
over
Rile
y Roa
dJu
n-08
41
73
4114
Indian
a33
027
1983
Ram
p C EB
over
Rile
y Roa
dJu
n-08
41
73
4215
Indian
a33
028
1983
Ram
p A W
B Ju
n-08
42
63
4316
Indian
a33
029
1983
SR 12
over
cana
lJu
n-08
41
43
4417
Main
e22
6219
83W
iscas
set B
ridge
- Sh
eeps
cot R
iver -
US
Rout
e 1No
v-10
77
73
4518
Mich
igan
5415
4014
000B
010
1983
US-1
31 S
B 5 m
i Sou
th B
ig Ra
pids
May
-10
76
746
19Ne
bras
kaS0
02 50
816
1983
N2 ov
er th
e Miss
ouri
Rive
rOc
t-08
77
74
4720
North
Car
olina
5140
182P
0000
000
1983
Viad
uct (
Linn C
ove)
Blue
Ridg
e Par
kway
Jun-
097
77
6
B2
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
4821
Florid
a87
0602
1984
SR 82
1 Ram
p to I
-75 N
BSe
p-08
77
70
4922
Indian
a49
0023
619
84W
est S
t ove
r IW
C Ca
nal
Sep-
086
67
150
23M
ichiga
n73
1731
1200
0B03
219
84I-7
5 SB
at Zi
lwau
kee
Oct-0
96
77
5124
Mich
igan
7317
3112
000B
038
1984
I-75 S
B RA
MP a
t Zilw
auke
eOc
t-09
77
752
25M
ichiga
n82
1820
2200
0S43
619
84M
-39 S
B RA
MP K
in A
llen P
ark
Aug-
107
76
5326
Was
hingt
on00
1204
2A00
0000
019
8418
2/16
N ov
er C
olum
bia R
iver
May
-10
66
73
5427
Was
hingt
on00
1240
42B0
0000
019
8418
2/16
S ov
er C
olum
bia R
iver
May
-10
66
63
5528
Miss
ouri
3493
1985
US 24
W M
ISSI
SSIPP
I RVR
Aug-
106
66
0Ca
ble S
taye
d56
1Co
lorad
oF-0
7-AK
1986
I-70 W
BND
Apr-0
87
78
657
2Co
lorad
oF-0
7-AL
1986
I-70 W
BND
Apr-0
87
77
658
3Co
lorad
oF-0
7-AN
1986
I-70 W
BND
Apr-0
88
77
659
4Co
lorad
oF-0
8-AA
1986
I-70 A
cces
s Rd G
rizzly
Cre
ekAp
r-08
88
86
605
Color
ado
F-08-
AB19
86I-7
0 Griz
zly C
reek
May
-08
77
76
616
Florid
a87
0643
1986
Ram
p to I
-75 N
BOc
t-08
77
70
627
Florid
a87
0644
1986
I-75 N
B to
SR
821
Oct-0
87
77
063
8Flo
rida
8706
4519
86SR
821 R
amp t
o I-7
5 SB
Oct-0
87
77
064
9Flo
rida
8706
4619
86I-7
5 SB
Oct-0
87
77
065
10Flo
rida
8706
4719
86I-7
5 NB
Oct-0
87
78
066
11Flo
rida
8603
8619
86SR
84 EB
I-59
5/ I-
75 In
terch
ange
Jan-
107
78
067
12Flo
rida
8603
8719
86I-5
95W
B to
I-75
SB In
terch
ange
Jan-
107
67
068
13Flo
rida
8603
8819
86I-7
5 NB
to I-
595E
B Int
erch
ange
Aug-
096
68
069
14Flo
rida
8603
8919
86I-7
5 Ind
ian Tr
ace (
SW14
)Oc
t-09
77
80
7015
Florid
a86
0385
1986
I-75S
B to
I-59
5EB
Inter
chan
geJa
n-10
77
70
7116
Indian
a49
0021
719
86Ind
iana/
Mich
igan o
ver I
WC
Cana
lSe
p-08
77
71
7217
Iowa
2530
119
86IA
2 ov
er M
issou
ri Ri
ver
Oct-0
87
78
473
18Ke
ntuc
ky00
7B00
137N
1986
Skyla
nd D
r. ove
r US
25E
May
-08
77
64
7419
Texa
s14
2270
AA18
5600
119
86Ba
rton C
reek
7
775
20Flo
rida
8604
3419
87SB
US-
1 to S
t Lau
derd
ale A
irpor
tM
ar-0
87
77
076
21Ke
ntuc
ky09
8B00
184N
1987
Ram
p B ov
er U
S 23
Feb-
097
78
477
22M
ississ
ippi
3100
6130
3000
450
1987
SR 61
3 Esc
ataw
pa R
ierAu
g-08
76
69
7823
Florid
a86
0510
1988
I-595
WB
to 86
9 NB
Inter
chan
geAu
g-09
77
80
7924
Florid
a86
0515
1988
869 S
B to
I-75
SB
Inter
chan
geAu
g-09
76
80
8025
Florid
a86
0516
1988
869 t
o I-7
5 SB
Inter
chan
geFe
b-08
76
70
8126
Florid
a86
0517
1988
869 S
B to
I-75
SB
595 I
nter
chan
geAu
g-09
77
70
8227
Florid
a86
0518
1988
869 S
b to I
-75 S
B 59
5 Int
erch
ange
Jan-
107
67
083
28Flo
rida
8605
1919
88I-7
5 NB
to 86
9 NB
Inter
chan
geAu
g-09
77
80
8429
Florid
a86
0476
1988
US 44
1 NB
to I-
595 W
B Int
erch
ange
Dec-0
97
57
085
30Flo
rida
8604
7719
88I-5
95 EB
to S
R7 N
B 59
5 Int
erch
ange
Dec-0
97
77
086
31Illi
nois
7501
2222
690
1988
I-72 E
B ov
er Ill
inois
Rive
rAp
r-10
76
79
8732
Illino
is75
0123
2371
519
88I-7
2 WB
over
Illino
is Ri
ver
Apr-1
06
67
988
33M
ississ
ippi
1100
1100
2400
010
1988
I-110
over
RR
and K
eega
n Bat
ouDe
c-09
77
71
8934
Miss
issipp
i17
0011
0024
0000
A19
88I-1
10 In
ner L
oop o
ver U
S 90
Dec-0
97
77
190
35M
ississ
ippi
1700
1100
2400
00B
1988
I-110
Out
er Lo
op ov
er U
S 90
Dec-0
97
77
191
36M
ississ
ippi
1700
1100
2400
08A
1988
I-110
Off
Ram
p ove
r Divi
sion S
t De
c-09
77
81
9237
Miss
issipp
i17
0011
0024
0008
B19
88I-1
10 O
n Ram
p ove
r Divi
sion S
TDe
c-09
77
81
9338
Oreg
on16
424 0
70 00
040
1988
COLU
MBI
A RI
VER
I-82
(Hw
y 070
) WB
Mar
-08
76
73
9439
Was
hingt
on00
1281
9A00
0000
019
88I-8
2 ove
r Colu
mbia
Rive
r @ O
rego
n Line
Mar
-10
76
73
B3
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
9540
Color
ado
F-08-
AV19
89I-7
0 WBN
DAp
r-08
87
76
9641
Color
ado
F-08-
BH19
89Fre
nch C
reek
Apr-0
87
77
697
42Flo
rida
8605
0919
89SB
869 t
o NB
I-75 I
nter
chan
geAu
g-09
77
70
9843
Florid
a86
0511
1989
SB 86
9 to E
B I-5
95 In
terch
ange
Feb-
087
68
099
44Flo
rida
7205
1819
89Na
poleo
n Bro
war
d Brid
ge (D
ames
Point
)Oc
t-09
76
76
100
45Flo
rida
8605
1219
89I-7
5 Sb t
o 896
NB
Inter
chan
geFe
b-08
76
80
101
46So
uth C
aroli
na10
1052
6424
0019
89W
ando
Rive
r Brid
geM
ar-1
06
66
110
247
Sout
h Car
olina
1010
5262
2500
1989
Wan
do R
iver B
ridge
Mar
-10
66
61
103
48Vi
rgini
a21
390
1989
Belvi
dere
St o
ver 2
nd Ja
mes
Rive
rJu
n-11
76
63
104
49W
ashin
gton
0012
833A
0000
000
1989
Lake
Was
hingt
on R
ev I-
90Au
g-09
77
73
105
50W
ashin
gton
0012
833B
0000
000
1989
Lake
Was
hingt
on W
B I-9
0Au
g-09
77
73
106
51Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
337
1989
HOUS
TON
ST TO
EL PA
SO S
T7
72
107
52Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
339
1989
GUAD
ALUP
E ST T
O S
LARE
DO6
72
108
53Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
344
1989
PECO
S ST
SB
77
210
954
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
719
89IH
35 O
N-RP
& G
UADA
LUPE
77
211
055
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
819
89R.
O.W
. NEA
R LE
ONA/
FRT.R
D7
82
111
56Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
349
1989
R.O.
W. N
OF S
LARE
DO7
82
112
57Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
356
1989
CAM
DEN
- QUI
NCY
ST6
72
113
58Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
358
1989
N FL
ORES
-N S
T. M
ARY’
S ST
77
211
459
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
219
89R.
O.W
. NEA
R ER
IE AV
E.7
82
115
60Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
363
1989
R.O.
W. N
EAR
BALT
IMOR
E AV
77
211
661
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1220
619
89LO
WER
LEVE
L6
72
117
62Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
211
1989
R.O.
W. N
OF C
ULEB
RA7
81
118
63Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
212
1989
R.O.
W. S
OF C
ULEB
RA7
72
119
64No
rth C
aroli
na93
0015
1990
Albe
mar
le So
und
Aug-
117
75
612
065
Virg
inia
1000
719
90Ja
mes
Rive
r - R
oute
295 (
Varin
a-En
on B
ridge
)M
ay-1
17
56
012
11
Alab
ama
1543
019
91Co
chra
ne -
Afric
anto
wn
Jan-
116
66
212
22
Color
ado
F-08-
AR19
91I-7
0 Colo
rado
Rive
r / U
P RR
May
-08
77
76
123
3Flo
rida
7205
7019
91Ac
osta
Brid
ge S
BAu
g-08
77
70
124
4Flo
rida
7205
7119
91Ac
osta
Brid
ge N
BJa
n-10
76
70
125
5Flo
rida
8750
0019
91Po
rt Bl
vd IC
WFe
b-10
77
79
126
6Flo
rida
8750
0119
91Po
rt Bl
vd IC
WFe
b-10
77
71
127
7Ge
orgia
051-
0169
-019
91Sa
vann
ah -
Talm
adge
Mem
orial
Brid
ge S
R 40
4 Spu
r (US
17)
Jan-
117
77
0Ca
ble S
taye
d BC
128
8Ida
ho00
0000
0000
1689
619
91Be
nnet
t Bay
Brid
ge C
ouer
Dale
ne’
May
-09
66
63
129
9Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
338
1991
EL PA
SO S
T TO
HOUS
TON
ST7
72
130
10Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
341
1991
PARK
ING
AREA
77
213
111
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
219
91PA
RKIN
G AR
EA7
62
132
12Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
345
1991
R.O.
W. S
OF D
URAN
GO B
LVD
88
213
313
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
619
91R.
O.W
. N O
F DUR
ANGO
BLV
D6
82
134
14Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
350
1991
R.O.
W. N
OF W
CEV
ALLO
S7
82
135
15Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
351
1991
R.O.
W. N
OF A
LAM
O ST
78
213
616
Texa
s15
0150
0072
1234
319
91R.
O.W
. S O
F W M
ARTIN
78
213
717
Texa
s20
1240
0306
0303
019
91NE
CHES
RIV
ER7
72
138
18Ca
lifor
nia57
1054
1992
Rout
e 78 S
an Y
sable
Cre
ekM
ay-0
96
87
413
919
Indian
a66
8319
92SR
26 EB
over
Wab
ash R
iver, C
SXDe
c-06
67
73
140
20Ind
iana
6685
1992
SR 26
WB
over
Wab
ash R
iver, C
SXDe
c-06
67
73
141
21Ne
vada
03
05-B
1868
1992
Hoov
er D
am B
ypas
sOc
t-09
57
76
B4
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
142
22Pu
erto
Rico
1982
119
92PR
10 ov
er G
agua
nas R
iver
Mar
-07
77
71
143
23Rh
ode I
sland
8000
1992
RI 13
8 ove
r Wes
t Pas
sage
Nar
ra B
ayM
ar-1
05
75
314
424
Color
ado
F-08-
BJ19
93I-7
0 Han
ging L
ake
Apr-0
87
78
614
525
Conn
ectic
ut06
200A
1993
Ferry
Roa
d Con
n. Ri
ver N
B I-9
5Ju
l-08
65
66
146
26Co
nnec
ticut
0620
0B19
93Fe
rry R
oad C
onn.
Rive
r SB
I-95
Jul-0
86
46
614
727
Florid
a57
0091
1993
SR 29
3 Cho
ctaw
atch
ee B
ayOc
t-08
77
70
148
28So
uth C
aroli
na10
4000
3000
100
1993
Ashle
y Rive
r Cha
rlesto
n CIP
Nov-0
86
66
114
929
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1034
019
93S
LARE
DO S
T TO
GUAD
ALUP
E6
72
150
30Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
357
1993
CAM
DEN
ST TO
N S
T MAR
YS7
72
151
31Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
359
1993
SAN
PEDR
O TO
BRO
OKLY
N AV
77
215
232
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
019
93N
ST M
ARY’
S ST
77
215
333
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
119
93R.
O.W
. W O
F N S
T. M
ARY’
S7
72
154
34Te
xas
1501
5000
1710
364
1993
ATLA
NTA
ST &
E EL
MIR
A ST
78
215
535
Texa
s15
0150
0017
1036
519
93IH
35 S
B OF
F RAM
P7
82
156
36Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
205
1993
W M
AGNO
LIA TO
N FR
IO S
T6
72
157
37Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
207
1993
WOO
DLAW
N AV
E7
82
158
38Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
208
1993
N TR
INITY
-IH 10
ON
RAM
P7
82
159
39Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
209
1993
R.O.
W. S
OF C
ULEB
RA7
82
160
40Te
xas
1501
5000
7212
210
1993
W PO
PLAR
ST
78
216
141
Calif
ornia
55C0
623
1994
BNSF
Am
trak M
etro
Link
/ El
Paso
Rd
Jun-
087
87
016
242
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0066
019
94W
INDW
ARD
VIAD
T IB
Feb-
097
77
216
343
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0066
119
94W
INDW
ARD
VIAD
T OB
Feb-
097
77
216
444
Miss
ouri
3497
1994
US 67
S -
RRJu
n-10
67
50
Cable
Sta
yed
165
45Ne
w Yo
rk22
6659
019
94Ne
pper
han P
ed B
DG ov
er N
eppe
rhan
Ave
Apr-1
17
58
116
646
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0042
319
95HA
LAW
A VA
L VIA
D IB
Feb-
097
77
216
747
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0042
419
95HA
LAW
A VA
LL V
IA O
BFe
b-09
77
72
168
1Ca
lifor
nia57
c067
619
96M
onte
zum
a Roa
d San
Dieg
oM
ar-1
07
77
016
92
Haw
aii00
3000
H302
0084
119
96H3
-KAN
EOHE
IC IB
No
v-09
77
72
170
3Ha
waii
0030
00H3
0200
842
1996
H3-K
ANEO
HE IC
OB
No
v-09
77
82
171
4Ha
waii
0030
00H3
0200
843
1996
KANE
OHE I
C RA
MP B
No
v-09
77
72
172
5W
ashin
gton
0014
409B
0000
000
1996
SR 50
9 ove
r Rve
r, RR
& Po
rtlan
d Ave
Sw
ing B
ridge
Jun-
107
77
3Sw
ing B
ridge
173
6Flo
rida
8901
5119
97US
-1 /
SR-7
07 S
B ov
er S
t Luc
ie Ri
ver -
Roo
seve
lt Br
idge
Jun-
087
87
017
47
Florid
a89
0152
1997
US-1
/ SR
-707
NB
over
St L
ucie
Rive
r - R
oose
velt
Bridg
eJu
n-08
78
70
175
8Flo
rida
7901
7419
97SR
439 S
eabr
eeze
WB
over
IWC
Oct-0
87
77
017
69
Florid
a79
0175
1997
SR 43
9 Sea
bree
ze W
B ov
er IW
COc
t-08
67
70
177
10M
issou
ri40
8919
97M
O 34
E - A
QUM
ar-1
07
87
0Ca
ble S
taye
d17
811
North
Car
olina
1370
015
1997
NC 33
Ove
r ICW
- Cr
oata
n Sou
nd B
ridge
Se
p-09
77
81
179
12No
rth C
aroli
na 68
0015
1997
Hobu
cken
Sep-
117
77
118
013
Arizo
na22
9519
98SR
87 -
Low
er S
cew
tail B
ridge
No
v-09
67
70
Balan
ced C
antil
ever
181
14Flo
rida
8606
2219
9817
th S
treet
Cau
sway
Au
g-10
88
80
182
15Flo
rida
8606
2319
9817
th S
treet
Cau
sway
Au
g-10
88
80
183
16M
innes
ota
6255
5A19
98W
abas
ha S
treet
NB
Aug-
117
88
4CI
P18
417
Minn
esot
a62
555B
1998
Wab
asha
Stre
et S
BSe
p-11
78
84
CIP
185
18Te
xas
1202
0005
8601
013
1998
Surfs
ide/ S
H 33
2 Int
erco
asta
l Can
al7
718
619
Texa
s14
2270
0015
1347
119
98IH
35 N
& S
BOU
ND8
72
187
20Te
xas
1422
7000
1513
472
1998
IH-3
5 N&S
BOU
ND8
72
188
21Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
080
1998
OHLE
N RD
& LO
CAL S
TREE
TS8
72
B5
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
189
22Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
081
1998
OHLE
N RD
& LO
CAL S
TREE
TS8
72
190
23Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
093
1998
US 18
3 NB
ENT R
AMP
87
219
124
Texa
s14
2270
0151
0609
419
98US
183 S
B EX
IT RA
MP
87
219
225
Texa
s14
2270
0151
0610
219
98US
183 &
IH 35
MAI
NLAN
E8
72
193
26Te
xas
1422
7001
5106
103
1998
IH35
SB
FTG
RD8
72
194
27Flo
rida
5801
7419
99SR
281 -
Gar
con P
oint -
San
ta R
osa B
ay B
ridge
Apr-0
97
77
019
528
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6606
8YUD
OTNB
I19
99I 9
3 RAM
P NS
M
ay-1
07
76
319
629
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6607
8YPD
OTNB
I19
99I 9
3 RAM
P SN
Ju
n-09
87
73
197
30M
issou
ri12
132
1999
Crev
e Coe
ur La
ke B
ridge
ASB
I 200
0 Ern
est P
etzo
idAu
g-10
77
70
198
31Ne
vada
I 214
119
99Ra
mp I
-15 S
to 95
E Sp
aghe
tti In
terch
nage
Feb-
097
77
119
932
Neva
daI 9
3919
99Ra
mp U
S 95
SW
to I-
15 S
Spa
ghet
ti Int
erch
ange
Jan-
097
77
120
033
Neva
daI 9
4019
99I01
5 Ram
p NW
Spa
ghet
ti Int
erch
ange
Jan-
097
77
120
134
Neva
daI 9
04R
1999
Ram
p N M
LK B
lvd S
pagh
etti
Inter
chan
geJa
n-09
77
71
202
35Ok
lahom
a06
5920
0000
0000
019
99US
59 ov
er G
rand
Lake
- Sa
ilboa
t Brid
ge
Nov-1
07
87
020
336
Indian
a33
163
2000
SR 91
2 EB
to I-
80 EB
Jun-
096
77
120
437
Indian
a33
166
2000
SR 01
2 WB
to I-
80 W
BJu
n-09
67
71
205
38M
assa
chus
etts
B166
569A
JDOT
NBI
2000
I 93 S
B
Feb-
117
77
320
639
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6656
9N3D
OTNB
I20
00I 9
3 SB
Ap
r-09
77
73
207
40M
assa
chus
etts
B166
569Q
6DOT
NBI
2000
I 93 S
B
Jun-
097
77
320
841
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6656
9Q7D
OTNB
I20
00I 9
3 SB
Ap
r-09
77
73
209
42Ok
lahom
a24
7910
0000
0000
020
00US
59 ov
er G
rand
Lake
- Sa
ilboa
t Brid
geNo
v-10
78
70
210
1Flo
rida
8901
5820
01SR
A1A
EB ov
er S
t Luc
ie Ri
ver -
Evan
s Cra
ry Br
idge
Jun-
098
78
021
12
Florid
a89
0160
2001
SR A
1A EB
over
St L
ucie
Rive
r - Ev
ans C
rary
Bridg
eJu
n-09
87
80
212
3Flo
rida
7901
8720
01US
92 B
road
way
Brid
ge ov
er IW
C W
BM
ar-0
97
77
921
34
Florid
a79
0188
2001
US 92
Bro
adw
ay B
ridge
over
IWC
EBM
ar-0
97
77
921
45
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6610
8Y6D
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP C
T
Mar
-10
66
73
215
6M
assa
chus
etts
B166
108Y
CDOT
NBI
2001
US 1
RAM
P CT
Ju
n-09
87
83
216
7M
assa
chus
etts
B166
108Y
DDOT
NBI
2001
US 1
RAM
P CT
Ju
n-09
77
73
217
8M
assa
chus
etts
B166
108Y
FDOT
NBI
2001
US 1
RAM
P CT
M
ar-1
07
67
321
89
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6611
8XYD
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP S
T
Jun-
098
77
321
910
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6611
8Y3D
OTNB
I20
01US
1 R
AMP S
T
May
-10
77
73
220
11M
assa
chus
etts
B166
598M
DDOT
NBI
2001
I 93 R
AMP X
X
Jan-
107
66
322
112
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6671
8TLD
OTNB
I20
01I 9
3 RAM
P MW
Apr-0
97
77
322
213
Miss
issipp
i55
7048
3P00
0000
020
01Na
tches
Trac
e Par
kway
- FH
WA
Dec-0
87
77
122
314
New
York
1075
569
2001
MR
14C
over
RTE
I-27
8 & M
arcy
Ave
Sep-
107
78
222
415
North
Car
olina
1870
015
2001
NC 32
over
Albe
mar
le So
und
Sep-
097
75
622
516
Virg
inia
2558
420
01Sm
art B
ridge
Rou
te 72
3 - W
ilson
Cre
ekNo
v-09
77
73
226
17Flo
rida
8605
2020
02SB
SR
A1A
& EB
SR
858
Ap
r-09
88
80
227
18Flo
rida
8606
3020
02I-5
95 &
US
1 to F
t Lau
derd
ale A
irpor
tNo
v-09
78
80
228
19Flo
rida
8606
3120
02En
tranc
e to F
t Lau
derd
ale A
irpor
tNo
v-09
79
90
229
20Flo
rida
8606
3220
02Ft
Laud
erda
le Ai
rpor
t to I
-595
& U
S 1
Nov-0
98
88
023
021
Florid
a86
0633
2002
Ft La
uder
dale
Airp
ort R
e-En
try R
amp
Nov-0
98
88
023
122
Florid
a86
0634
2002
Ft La
uder
dale
Airp
ort R
e-En
try R
amp
Nov-0
98
89
023
223
Florid
a86
0635
2002
Ft La
uder
dale
Airp
ort R
e-En
try R
amp
Nov-0
99
89
023
324
Geor
gia12
7-50
20-0
2002
Brun
swick
- Si
dney
Lanie
r SR
25 (U
S 17
)M
ar-1
17
78
0Ca
ble S
taye
d BC
234
25M
assa
chus
etts
B163
9282
FDOT
NBI
2002
US 1
RAM
P TC
M
ar-1
06
67
323
526
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6392
8DGD
OTNB
I20
02US
1 R
AMP T
C
Jul-0
97
76
3
B6
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
236
27M
assa
chus
etts
B163
928Q
GDOT
NBI
2002
US 1
RAM
P TC
Ju
l-09
87
83
237
28M
assa
chus
etts
B163
928X
UDOT
NBI
2002
US 1
RAM
P TC
Ju
l-09
77
83
238
29M
assa
chus
etts
B163
928X
WDO
TNBI
2002
US 1
RAM
P TC
M
ar-1
06
66
323
930
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6600
901D
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 NB
Fe
b-10
77
73
240
31M
assa
chus
etts
B166
009P
MDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP S
A - C
NDe
c-09
77
73
241
32M
assa
chus
etts
B166
018Y
WDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 S
B
Jan-
107
76
324
233
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6601
8YXD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 SB
M
ar-1
07
67
324
334
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6659
82ND
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 RAM
P XX
Ja
n-10
65
53
244
35M
assa
chus
etts
B166
618Q
XDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 N
B
Jun-
097
77
324
536
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6661
8QYD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 NB
Ap
r-09
76
73
246
37M
assa
chus
etts
B166
618R
0DOT
NBI
2002
I 93 N
B
Mar
-10
66
63
247
38M
assa
chus
etts
B166
628T
MDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP K
Jan-
107
67
324
839
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
8TPD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ap
r-09
77
73
249
40M
assa
chus
etts
B166
628T
TDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP K
Apr-0
97
78
325
041
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6668
8MCD
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 RAM
P XXE
De
c-09
77
73
251
42M
assa
chus
etts
B166
6982
HDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 H
OV R
AMP E
B Ju
n-10
65
73
252
43M
assa
chus
etts
B166
6982
JDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 H
OV R
AMP E
B Ja
n-10
77
73
253
44M
assa
chus
etts
B166
708T
WDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP K
K
Mar
-10
66
73
254
45M
assa
chus
etts
B166
719P
WDO
TNBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP M
W
Ju
n-09
77
73
255
46M
assa
chus
etts
B166
8182
PDOT
NBI
2002
COM
B I9
0 RPS
&HOV
&AM
TK H
WY
FRO
NTAG
E RD
Jun-
097
77
325
647
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6681
8QVD
OTNB
I20
02HW
Y F
RONT
AGE R
D M
ar-1
17
67
325
748
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6682
8M5D
OTNB
I20
02I 9
3 RAM
P LL
De
c-10
65
73
258
49M
assa
chus
etts
C010
498Y
HDOT
NBI
2002
I 93 R
AMP T
S
Apr-1
07
76
325
950
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
420
02I-2
5 NB
to I-
40 W
B Bi
g I In
terch
ange
Nov-0
97
77
126
051
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
520
02I-2
5 SB
to I-
40 W
B Bi
g I In
terch
ange
Nov-0
97
67
126
152
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
720
02I-4
0 WB
to I-
25 S
B Bi
g I In
terch
nage
Oct-0
97
77
126
253
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0995
820
02I-2
5 SB
to I-
40 EB
Big
I Inte
rchan
geOc
t-09
77
75
263
54Ne
w M
exico
0000
0000
0009
959
2002
I-25 N
B to
I-40
EB B
ig I In
terch
ange
Nov-0
97
77
126
455
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0996
020
02I-4
0 EB
Ram
p to I
-25 S
B Bi
g I In
terch
nage
Nov-0
97
77
126
556
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0996
120
02I-4
0 EB
Ram
p to I
-25 N
B Bi
g I In
terch
nage
Nov-0
97
77
126
657
New
Mex
ico00
0000
0000
0996
220
02I-4
0 Wb R
amp t
o I-2
5 NB
Big I
Inte
rchna
geNo
v-09
77
71
267
58Vi
rgini
a27
293
2002
Poca
hont
as Pk
y EB
over
Jam
es R
iver
Sep-
107
67
326
859
Virg
inia
2729
420
02Po
caho
ntas
Pky W
B ov
er Ja
mes
Rive
rSe
p-10
77
73
269
60Vi
rgini
a27
295
2002
Fallin
g Cre
ek R
amps
- Ra
mp E
0f I-
95 N
BLSe
p-10
76
61
270
61Vi
rgini
a27
296
2002
Rmp A
150 &
Dup
ont R
amp H
of 89
5 WBL
Aug-
107
77
127
162
Virg
inia
2729
720
02Rm
p 895
& R
amps
0f 15
0 Ram
p G of
895 W
BLAu
g-10
77
71
272
63Flo
rida
9304
7720
03I-9
5 SB
to S
R-80
PB In
terch
ange
Dec-0
97
88
027
364
Florid
a93
0478
2003
SR-8
0 Ram
p NB
I-95 P
B Int
erch
ange
Dec-0
98
88
027
465
Florid
a46
0113
2003
Hath
away
US
98Oc
t-09
77
70
275
66Flo
rida
1701
7620
03RI
NGLIN
G CA
USEW
AY S
R 78
9 ove
r ICW
Jan-
107
78
027
667
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6600
900D
OTNB
I20
03I 9
3 NB
Ja
n-10
77
73
277
68M
assa
chus
etts
B166
659A
YDOT
NBI
2003
I 93 R
AMP A
S
Feb-
107
77
327
869
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6670
9URD
OTNB
I20
03I 9
3 RAM
P KK
Ju
n-09
77
73
279
70M
assa
chus
etts
B166
769Q
LDOT
NBI
2003
I 93 R
AMP C
C
Jul-1
07
77
328
071
Texa
s12
0200
0587
0100
520
03GU
LF-IN
TRAC
OAST
AL W
TRW
AY7
61
281
72Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
479
2003
IH 63
5/US
75 IN
TERC
HANG
E - H
igh F
ive7
71
282
73Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
480
2003
IH 63
5/US
75 IN
TERC
HANG
E - H
igh F
ive7
61
B7
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
283
74Flo
rida
9304
7920
04I-9
5 SB
to PB
IA PB
Inte
rchna
geDe
c-09
77
70
284
75Flo
rida
9304
8020
04PB
IA to
I-95
SB
Dec-0
97
78
028
576
Florid
a93
0481
2004
I-95 S
B to
PBIA
PB In
terch
nage
Dec-0
97
88
028
677
Florid
a93
0482
2004
I-95 N
B to
PBIA
PB In
terch
nage
Dec-0
98
89
028
778
Florid
a93
0483
2004
PBIA
Ram
p to I
-95 N
BDe
c-09
77
80
288
79Flo
rida
9304
8420
04PB
IA R
amp t
o I-9
5 SB
Dec-0
98
88
028
980
Florid
a46
0112
2004
Hath
away
US
98Oc
t-09
77
70
290
81Flo
rida
7206
3920
04I-9
5 SB
to 9A
Jax S
outh
Inte
rchan
ge R
amp J
-2Ap
r-08
77
80
291
82Flo
rida
9305
0620
04Ro
yal P
ark B
ridge
Nov-1
08
87
029
283
Flroid
a93
0507
2004
Roya
l Par
k Brid
geNo
v-10
88
70
293
84M
assa
chus
etts
B166
039P
FDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP S
A-CN
M
ar-1
06
77
329
485
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6658
9B0D
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P X
Ja
n-10
66
73
295
86M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589Q
WDO
TNBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Dec-0
97
77
329
687
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6658
9QXD
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P X
De
c-09
77
73
297
88M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589Q
YDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Dec-0
97
77
329
889
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6658
9RM
DOTN
BI20
04I 9
3 RAM
P X
Ja
n-10
77
73
299
90M
assa
chus
etts
B166
589R
NDOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP X
Jan-
107
77
330
091
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6662
9UTD
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P K
Ju
n-10
77
73
301
92M
assa
chus
etts
B166
629V
0DOT
NBI
2004
I 93 R
AMP K
Jun-
107
67
330
293
Mas
sach
uset
tsB1
6666
9QRD
OTNB
I20
04I 9
3 RAM
P FX
M
ar-1
07
77
330
394
Color
ado
H-09
-U20
05M
AROO
N CR
EEK
Asp
en
May
-09
88
86
304
95Flo
rida
8709
7220
05SR
-25 o
ver O
keec
hobe
e Rd
Nov-1
08
88
630
596
Florid
a72
0640
2005
I-95 N
B to
I-29
5 NB
Jax S
outh
Inte
rchan
ge R
amp I
-2Ap
r-08
77
80
306
97Flo
rida
7206
4120
05I-2
95 S
B to
I-95
NB
Jax S
outh
Inte
rchna
ge R
amp H
-1Ja
n-10
77
80
307
98Flo
rida
1502
4420
05CL
EARW
ATER
MEM
ORIA
L CSW
Y. SR
60Ja
n-10
77
70
308
99Flo
rida
1008
1220
05CR
OSST
OWN
(SR-
618)
Lero
y Selm
an Ex
psw
yAu
g-08
88
80
309
100
Indian
a41
966
2005
I-70 W
BL O
N RA
MP
Aug-
088
88
331
010
1Ind
iana
4196
820
05I-7
0 EBL
OFF
RAM
P Au
g-08
88
83
311
102
Indian
a41
972
2005
I-70 E
BL O
N RA
MP
Aug-
088
88
331
210
3M
assa
chus
etts
B166
038D
EDOT
NBI
2005
I 93 R
AMP S
ACN
M
ar-1
06
77
331
310
4M
assa
chus
etts
B166
038D
FDOT
NBI
2005
I 93 R
AMP S
ACN
M
ar-1
06
77
331
410
5M
assa
chus
etts
B166
599Q
5DOT
NBI
2005
COM
B I9
0&I93
RMP L
L&AM
TK I
93 R
AMP X
X M
ar-1
17
78
931
510
6M
assa
chus
etts
B166
629Q
4DOT
NBI
2005
COM
B I9
0&I93
RMP L
L&AM
TK I
93 R
AMP K
M
ar-1
17
77
931
610
7Ne
w Je
rsy12
2315
020
05Vi
ctory
Brdg
e - R
arita
n Rive
r NJ-
35Se
p-09
77
71
317
108
Ohio
2031
272
2005
I-280
Vet
eran
s Glas
s City
Sky
way
- M
aum
ee R
iver B
ridge
Dec-0
99
99
231
810
9So
uth C
aroli
na10
2000
1700
900
2005
Arth
ur R
aven
el Jr.
Brid
geOc
t-08
88
83
Cable
Sta
yed
319
110
Sout
h Dak
ota
2304
6203
2005
Four
Bea
rs Br
idge
Nov-0
99
99
320
111
Texa
s18
0570
2374
0147
420
05IH
635/
US75
RAM
PNE -
High
Five
Inte
rchan
ge7
732
111
2Te
xas
1805
7023
7401
477
2005
IH 63
5/US
75 R
AMPS
W- H
igh Fi
ve In
terch
ange
77
322
113
Texa
s18
0570
2374
0148
220
05IH
635 H
OV FL
YOVE
R- H
igh Fi
ve In
terch
ange
77
323
114
Texa
s18
0570
2374
0146
520
05HO
V T-R
AMP I
H 63
5 WB
77
324
1Flo
rida
1008
0020
06SR
-618
(CRO
SSTO
WN)
Lero
y Selm
an Ex
psw
yAu
g-08
77
80
325
2Flo
rida
1008
0620
06SR
618 (
CROS
STOW
N) Le
roy S
elman
Exps
wy
Aug-
087
78
032
63
Florid
a89
0150
2006
Erne
st Ly
ons B
ridge
Ju
n-09
99
90
327
4M
assa
chus
etts
B166
629Q
3DOT
NBI
2006
I 93 R
AMP K
Jun-
106
67
332
85
Minn
esot
a82
856
2006
I-494
WB
Oct-1
18
88
4CI
P32
96
Texa
s12
0850
0500
0137
320
06IH
45 N
B - G
alves
ton B
ay7
7
B8
Code
De
scrip
tion
Code
De
scrip
tion
1 M
onoli
thic
Conc
rete
(Con
curre
ntly
Place
d with
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k)
5 Ep
oxy O
verla
y2
Integ
ral C
oncre
te (S
epar
ate N
on-M
odifie
d Lay
er of
Con
crete
Add
ed to
Stru
ctura
l Dec
k) 6
Bitu
mino
us3
Late
x Con
crete
or S
imila
r Add
itive
9
Othe
r4
Low
Slum
p Con
crete
0
None
(No A
dditi
onal
Conc
rete
Thick
ness
or W
earin
g Sur
face
is In
clude
d in t
he B
ridge
Dec
k)
201
2 D
ura
bili
ty S
urv
ey o
f C
oncr
ete
Seg
men
tal B
ridges
by
Year
Built
2012
Con
ditio
n Su
rvey
No.
No
Tim
eSt
ate
Brid
ge N
umbe
r Ye
ar
Built
Nam
eIn
spec
tion
Dat
eD
eck
C
ondi
tion
Supe
rstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
bstr
uctu
re
Con
ditio
nSu
rfac
e Ty
peC
onst
ruct
ion
Met
hod
330
7Ca
lifor
nia13
C002
220
07GO
ODYE
ARS
CREE
K
Au
g-08
75
70
331
8Ca
lifor
nia28
0153
R C2
220
07UP
BNS
F AM
TRAK
SUI
SUN
BANo
v-09
78
72
332
9M
innes
ota
27V6
520
07M
N 12
1 NB
Apr-1
19
99
4Pr
ecas
t33
310
Minn
esot
a27
V66
2007
I-35W
Ram
pAu
g-11
88
84
Prec
ast
334
11M
innes
ota
27V7
320
07I-3
5W R
amp
Aug-
118
88
4Pr
ecas
t33
512
North
Car
olina
1290
103
2007
Cape
Fear
Rive
r - I-
140 /
US-
17 B
ypas
sJu
n-08
77
72
336
13Or
egon
1973
9 001
1205
720
07S
UMPQ
UA R
& C
ORP I
-5 (H
wy 0
01) S
BNo
v-06
88
80
337
14Pe
nnsly
vania
6670
7699
0245
720
2007
Susq
uhan
na B
ridge
Turn
pike (
I-76)
May
-08
88
81
pre-
cast,
span
-by-s
pan
338
15Pe
nnsly
vania
6670
7699
0245
730
2007
Susq
uhan
na B
ridge
Turn
pike (
I-76)
May
-08
88
81
pre-
cast,
span
-by-s
pan
339
16Te
xas
1208
5005
0001
374
2007
IH 45
SB
- Galv
esto
n Bay
77
340
17Ca
lifor
nia34
-000
7L20
08Sa
n Fra
nsisc
o-Oa
kland
Bay
Brid
ge S
kyw
ayJu
n-08
78
75
341
18Ca
lifor
nia34
-000
7R20
08Sa
n Fra
nsisc
o-Oa
kland
Bay
Brid
ge S
kyw
aySe
p-08
78
75
342
19M
innes
ota
2740
920
08Sa
int A
ntho
ny Fa
lls B
ridge
New
I-35
W S
B
Oct-1
18
88
2Pr
ecas
t34
320
Minn
esot
a27
410
2008
Saint
Ant
hony
Falls
Brid
ge N
ew I-
35W
NB
Oc
t-11
88
82
Prec
ast
344
21M
innes
ota
27V7
520
08I-3
5W R
amp
Aug-
118
88
4Pr
ecas
t34
522
Minn
esot
a27
V76
2008
TH 62
WB
Aug-
118
88
4Pr
ecas
t34
623
Minn
esot
a27
V79
2008
I-35W
Ram
pAu
g-11
88
84
Prec
ast
347
24M
ississ
ippi
SA43
0000
0000
051
2008
Lazy
Roa
dNo
v-09
88
81
348
25No
rth C
aroli
na 64
0103
2007
Wilm
ingto
n Byp
ass
Jun-
107
76
234
926
Calif
ornia
10 02
99
2009
SOUT
H FO
RK EE
L RIV
ER
Jul-0
97
87
035
027
Calif
ornia
30 00
5320
09GA
RDNE
R LA
NE
Oct-0
97
87
035
128
Calif
ornia
30 00
5420
09M
URPH
YS G
RADE
ROA
D
Oc
t-09
78
70
352
29Ca
lifor
nia30
0055
2009
PENS
TOCK
AQU
EDUC
T
Oc
t-09
78
70
353
30Ca
lifor
nia30
0056
2009
ANGE
LS C
REEK
Oc
t-09
78
70
354
31Ca
lifor
nia33
C023
9R20
09AR
ROYO
DEL
VAL
LE
Oc
t-09
78
70
355
32Ne
w Je
rsy13
1516
920
09Sh
rew
sbur
y Rive
r - N
J-36
Dec-0
99
99
635
633
New
York
1060
919
2009
Brya
nt A
ve H
emps
tead
Ha
Rt 25
ADe
c-10
99
92
357
34Te
xas
2003
6005
0802
179
2009
Trinit
y Rive
r IH
10 W
B7
735
835
Texa
s13
1580
0604
0100
420
09FM
2031
Inte
rcoas
tal W
ater
way
88
359
36Flo
rida
7207
6120
10I/9
5 I-2
95 N
orth
Flyo
ver
Jul-1
08
88
036
037
Minn
esot
a82
855
2010
I-494
EBOc
t-11
88
84
CIP
361
38M
issou
ri33
066
2010
MIS
SISS
IPPI R
VR, N
. BRO
A (Pr
estre
ssed
Con
crete
App
roac
h) St
eel C
ont.
Jun-
107
99
0Ca
ble S
taye
d36
239
Miss
ouri
3285
420
10IS
29 S
- Le
vee
Jan-
109
99
0Ca
ble S
taye
d36
340
Wes
t Virg
inia
0000
0000
020A
842
2010
I-64 E
B Ka
naw
ha R
iver B
ridge
4077
39
89
3Ba
lance
d Can
tilev
er
Cons
tructi
on
I-35W, Minneapolis MinnesotaMain Photo Courtesy of FIGG; Inset Photos Courtesy of Shutterstock
Follow us on142 Cimarron Park Loop, Suite F, Buda, Texas 78610-2837 Tel: 512.523.8214 n Fax: 512.523.8213
e-mail: [email protected] n website: www.asbi-assoc.org