32
1 American Segmental Bridge Institute Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges Fourth Edition, 2012

ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    14

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

1American Segmental Bridge Institute

Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

Fourth Edition, 2012

Page 2: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

Benicia Martinez, California Photo Courtesy of T.Y. Lin International

du•ra•bil•i•ty: able to exist for a long time without

significant deterioration

Acknowledgements(Fourth Edition)

The “Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges” 1994, identified 194 structures by type and age, evaluating 96 of these bridges based on bridge inspection reports, and rating

the bridge conditions using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines.

For this fourth report, approximately 460 segmental bridges were identified with data obtained for 363 bridges.

Contributions to the Durability Survey by individuals who were primary authors are acknowledged as follows:

by Brett Pielstick, P.E., Eisman & Russo, Inc.Chair, ASBI Bridge Condition Advisory Committee

Co-Authored by Leo Offredi, P.E., Eisman & Russo, Inc.

© Copyright 1994, 1999, 2008, 2012 by the American Segmental Bridge Institute. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher.

Cover Photos: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Tampa Bay, Florida; I-35W, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Benecia Martinez, California; High Five Interchange, US 75, Dallas, Texas; I-64 Kanawha River Bridge, Kanawha County, West Virginia.

Page 3: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 1

Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Tampa Bay, Florida. Photo Coutesy of Shutterstock.

Introduction As the name implies, a segmental bridge is a bridge built in short sections (called segments), i.e., one piece at a time, as opposed to traditional methods that build a bridge in very large sections. The bridge is made of concrete that is either cast-in-place (constructed fully in its final location) or precast (built in a pre-cast yard and transported to its final location for placement in the full structure)1.

Some of the primary advantages of segmental concrete bridge construction are the economics2, factory quality in tandem with accelerated construction methods. The inherit repetition and redundancy of segmental construction is key to obtaining higher quality and is considered the original Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) method. Through the use of form-travelers for cast-in-place or the casting machines for precast forms, segmental construction, with its similar or redundant operations associated with these methods, provides efficient production rates and cost savings in the casting and erection operation. The controlled environment of a casting yard for precast segmental bridges provides a factory controlled system with less exposure to the elements, allowing higher production rates and higher quality segments. These improved production methods lead directly to longer lasting durable bridges by extending the service life well beyond the design service life.

The first American Segmental Bridge Institute (ASBI) inventory of concrete segmental bridges built in the United States and Canada was published in 19943. The 1994 survey identified 194 structures by type and age, evaluating 96 of these bridges based on bridge inspection reports, and rating the bridge conditions using Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines. The 1994 report rated all segmental bridges as fair or better with 98 percent of the bridges rating as satisfactory or better.

Five years later in 19993, ASBI again solic-ited inspection reports from the owners to continue the evaluation of concrete segmental construction. Responses were obtained for 264 bridges, with inspection reports and con-dition ratings for 131 bridges. Again, for the 131 structures where inspection reports were available, all bridges were rated as “fair” or better. Of the 131 bridges, 99 percent had superstructure ratings of “satisfactory” or better, 79 percent had superstructure rates of “good” or better, and 31 percent had super-structure ratings of “very good” or better.

In 20074, ASBI solicited the inspection reports from the FHWA and owners, identifying over 400 bridges, and obtained 275 inspection reports including condition ratings. Again all segmental bridges were rated as “fair” or better. Of the 275 bridges reviewed, over 97 percent had superstructure ratings

of “satisfactory” or better, 85 percent had superstructure ratings of “good” or better, and 25 percent had superstructure ratings of “very good” or better. The average of the 275 seg-mental bridge superstructure ratings included in this report was 7, or “good condition.”

For this fourth report, approximately 460 segmental bridges were identified with data obtained for 363 bridges. Of these 363 structures, with service lives up to 40 years, 95 percent had superstructure ratings of “sat-isfactory” or better, 75 percent had ratings of “good” or better, and 18 percent had super-structure ratings of “very good” or better. The average rating of the representative sample was again found to be 6.9 or in “good condition.” This sampling of segmental bridg-es for 2012 reports 98 percent of the segmental bridges rating as satisfactory or better - which is the same percentage as the first report in 1994.

The findings of this fourth survey, based primarily on 2011 National Bridge Inventory (NBI) inspection reports, again indicates that concrete segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges are performing extremely well com-pared to their contemporaries, with projected service lives well beyond 50 years with minimum future interventions or maintenance required on the bridges.

Page 4: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

2 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

I-64 Kanawha River Bridge, Kanawha County, West Virginia.

Photos Courtesy of T.Y. Lin International

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0

5

10

15

20

Cumulative Total of Bridges Built Number Built Per Year

25

30

35

40

45

50

1973

19

74

1975

19

76

1977

19

78

1979

19

80

1981

19

82

1983

19

84

1985

19

86

1987

19

88

1989

19

90

1991

19

92

1993

19

94

1995

19

96

1997

19

98

1999

20

00

2001

20

02

2003

20

04

2005

20

06

2007

20

08

2009

20

10

Cu

mu

lati

ve T

ota

l o

f B

rid

ges

Bu

ilt

Nu

mb

er B

uil

t P

er Y

ear

Year Built

2012 Summary of Bridges Built by Year

Trend Line

Figure 1: Line Graph of Segmental Bridges Inventoried by Year with Cumulative Totals

Segmental Bridge InventoryThe purpose of the ASBI Durability Report is to summarize and quantify the existing con-dition of concrete segmental bridges, which now have service lives of up to 40 years in the United States, and demonstrate that this technology is durable, providing long-lasting structures. ASBI has inventoried segmen-tal concrete bridges by utilizing the FHWA 2011 NBI database5, as well as contacting individual states and agencies for information. Respondents were asked to identify concrete segmental bridges in their jurisdictions and, for each structure, provide the completion date, type of construction, span lengths, roadway width, and total bridge length.

The survey also requested that available bridge inspection reports be returned with the questionnaire.

All of the states and U.S. territories with concrete segmental bridges were represented in the data collected (38 identified).

Figures 1 represents the number of segmen-tal bridges constructed annually for which inspection reports were received for the 2012 Survey. An alphabetical listing of these Segmental bridges by state is included in Ap-pendix A. Appendix B presents a chronological listing based on year of construction.

Page 5: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 3

Rating for Concrete BridgesN NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deteriora-tion, spalling or scour.

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deteriora-tion, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major dete-rioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service - beyond corrective action.

Table 1: Coding Definitions for FHWA Bridge Condition Ratings5

ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteelSteel ContinuousPrestressedPrestressed Continuous

SegmentalWood and TimberMasonryAluminum and Cast IronOther

Concrete24.45%

ConcreteContinuous

10.69%

Steel17.45%

Steel Continuous7.95%

Prestressed29.46%

Prestressed Continuous

6.50%

Segmental0.11%

Wood and Timber2.85%

Masonry0.01%

Aluminumand Cast Iron

0.38%Other0.15%

Percentage of Bridges Built From 1970

Concrete29.24%

ConcreteContinuous

13.32%

Steel22.42%

Steel Continuous8.21%

Prestressed19.51%

Prestressed Continuous

3.57%

Segmental0.08%

Wood and Timber4.01%

Masonry0.29%

Aluminumand Cast Iron

0.24%Other0.15%

Percentage all Bridges by Type

Figure 2: Bridge Type by Percent of All Bridges in the NBI Figure 3: Bridge Type by Percent of Bridges Built from 1970

BackgroundThe following information is modeled from the December 2011 FHWA NBI Database, documenting the condition of bridges in the United States:

There are 604,426 bridges in the United States (373,670 built from 1970) listed in the 2011 FHWA NBI. Many of these bridges are from 40 to 75 years old and are beginning to show their age, with 69,223 bridges (11.45 percent) rated as structurally deficient. An additional 77,395 bridges are listed as functionally obsolete. The discussion in this survey focuses primarily on structural deficient bridges.

A bridge is classified as structurally defi-cient when it has a rating of poor (4 on the condition rating) or worse for the condition of the deck, superstructure or substructure, or when its load-carrying capacity is significantly below minimum standards. Table 1 presents the coding definitions for the FHWA bridge condition ratings. Replacement of the large backlog of structurally deficient bridges with

bridges, like segmental bridges, that have a long service life, is a desirable goal.

Figure 2 shows the proportion of all bridges, by type, in the 2011 FHWA NBI system. To better compare the performance of segmental bridges to all bridges in the NBI, the data for all the structures built in the past 40 years were broken out and analyzed. Figure 3 shows the proportion by bridge type included in the NBI built from 1970 to present.

Figure 3 shows that all concrete bridge types make up 71 percent of bridges built since 1970 but Figure 4 indicates they represent only 39 percent of the structurally deficient bridges from that same time period. More importantly, for this report, segmental bridges represent 0.12 percent of all bridges built from 1970 yet only represent .08 percent of structurally deficient bridges (Figure 4).

As shown in Figure 2, steel bridges of all types represent 31 percent of the total bridges in the NBI, with Figure 3 showing the percent of steel bridges built since 1970 to be about

Page 6: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

4 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

High Five Interchange, US 75, Dallas, Texas.

Photo Courtesy of Texas Department of Transportation

Concrete12.86%

ConcreteContinuous

6.18%

Steel36.76%

Steel Continuous6.58%

Prestressed16.89%

PrestressedContinuous

2.78%

Segmental0.06%

Masonry0.00%

Wood andTimber17.52%

Aluminum andCast Iron

0.33%Other0.04%

Percentage of Structurally De�cient BridgesFrom 1970 by Type

Figure 4: Percentage by Type, Structurally Deficient from 1970

0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteel Continuous

Prestressed Continuous

Steel

Prestressed

SegmentalW

ood and Timber

Aluminum and Cast Iron

Masonry

Other

1.02%

3.28%

0%

23.17%

1.93%1.61%2.16%3.12%

7.94%

2.18%1.98%

Percentage Structurally De�cient in Each Type from 1970

Per

cen

t D

e�ci

ent

in E

ach

Typ

e

Figure 5: Percentage Structurally Deficient in Each Type from 1970

25 percent of all bridge types. Figure 4 shows that 43 percent of steel bridges built since 1970 are structurally deficient. Timber bridges, while representing only 2.8 percent of the structures built since 1970, represent about 18 percent of the structurally deficient bridges on the system during this period.

In this study, seven segmental bridges identi-fied from four different states have been rated as structurally deficient in the 2011 NBI data. The states which have classified the seven seg-mental bridges as structurally deficient include Indiana, Minnesota, Florida and Connecticut. ASBI investigated the root cause of these con-dition ratings which included failure of drain-age systems which allowed de-icing chemical runoff to pond inside the box, resulting in excessive chloride penetration with complete loss of rebar and post-tensioning in Indiana and Minnesota. The structures in Indiana have been closed and will be replaced or taken out of service and the structure in Minnesota is under rehabilitation at this time. In Florida, the low condition rating was due to the substructure rating in a very aggressive marine environment. Recent inspections on some of the countries earliest bridges in the Florida Keys have shown improvement in condition ratings after some

intervention and improvements. In Connecticut, excessive deck cracking has caused deteriora-tion resulting in a low rating.

To better illustrate the percentage of structur-ally deficient bridges in each category, Figure 5 graphically depicts the percentage of struc-turally deficient bridges within each bridge type built since 1970. This chart shows that for each concrete bridge type, about 2 percent are structurally deficient. In comparison, it can also been seen that about 8 percent of steel bridge type and 3 percent of the steel continuous bridge type built since 1970 are structurally deficient.

By definition the functionally obsolete clas-sification means that a bridge fails to meet current design criteria for deck geometry, clearances, or approach roadway geometry or has low appraisal ratings for waterway adequacy or load capacity. For interest, Figure 6 shows the percentage of bridges built since 1970 that are functionally obsolete. Figure 7 shows the functionally obsolete bridges within each bridge type built since 1970.

Figures 8 and 9 depict the percent of deficient bridges either structurally or functionally by type and within each type, built since 1970.

Page 7: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 5

Figure 6: Percentage by Type, Functionally Obsolete from 1970

Figure 8: Percentage by Type, Deficient from 1970

Figure 7: Percentage Functionally Obsolete in Each Type from 1970

Figure 9: Percentage Deficient from 1970 within each Type

Percentage of Functionally Obsolete BridgesBuilt From 1970 by Type

Concrete14.28%

ConcreteContinuous

6.03%

Steel26.40%

SteelContinuous

13.24%

Prestressed29.81%

PrestressedContinuous

5.75%

Segmental0.07%

Wood andTimber3.98%

Masonry0.01%

Aluminum andCast Iron

0.26%

Other0.15%

ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteel Continuous

Prestressed Continuous

Steel

Prestressed

SegmentalW

ood and Timber

Aluminum and Cast Iron

Masonry

Other

7.58%

5.17%

15.79%

10.48%

4.41%

6.64%7.60%

12.50%11.36%

4.24%4.38%

0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

Per

cen

t o

f Fu

nct

ion

ally

Ob

sole

te in

Eac

h T

ype

Percentage Functionally Obsolete in Each Type from 1970

Concrete13.81%

Concrete Continuous

6.08%

Steel29.86%

SteelContinuous

11.01%

Prestressed25.50%

PrestressedContinuous

4.76%

Segmental0.06%

Wood and Timber8.51%

Masonry0.01%

Aluminum andCast Iron

0.29%

Other0.12%

Summary of De�cient Bridgesby Type From 1970

ConcreteConcrete ContinuousSteel Continuous

Prestressed Continuous

Steel

Prestressed

SegmentalW

ood and Timber

Aluminum and Cast Iron

Masonry

Other

0%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

Summary of Percentage De�cient in Each Type from 1970

Per

cen

t D

e�ci

ent

8.61%8.45%

15.79%

6.34%8.26%

9.76%

15.62%

19.30%

6.42%6.37%

33.66%

Page 8: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

6 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

71%

39%

56%50%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

All Concrete Type BridgesFrom 1970

Percent of Concrete Structures

to all Bridge Types

Percent of Structurally De�cient Concrete

Bridges to all Structurally De�cient BridgesPercent of De�cient Concrete

Bridges to all De�cient Bridges

Percent of Functionally Obsolete Concrete

Bridges to all Functionally Obsolete

Figure 10: All Concrete Type Bridges from 1970

Figure 13: Segmental Superstructure, Substructure and Deck Condition Ratings from 2011 Data

Figure 11: All Steel Type Bridges from 1970 Figure 12: All Segmental Type Bridges from 1970

25%

43%40% 41%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%

All Steel Type BridgesFrom 1970

Percent of Steel Structures

to all Bridge Types

Percent of Structurally De�cient Steel

Bridges to all Structurally De�cient BridgesPercent of De�cient Steel

Bridges to all De�cient Bridges

Percent of Functionally Obsolete Steel

Bridges to all Functionally Obsolete

0.114%

0.058%0.067% 0.064%

0.000%

0.020%

0.040%

0.060%

0.080%

.0100%

0.120%

Comparison of SegmentalBridges From 1970

Percent of Segmental Bridges

to all Bridge Types

Percent of Structurally De�cient Segmental

Bridges to all De�cient Bridges

Percent of De�cient Segmental

Bridges to all De�cient Bridges

Percent of Functionally Obsolete Segmental

Bridges to all Functionally Obsolete

1970-1975

1976-1980

1981-1985

1986-1990

1991-1995

1996-2000

2001-2005

2006-2010

Weighted Average Condition Deck 7.00 6.27 6.46 6.91 6.02 6.88 7.12 7.60 Weighted Average Condition Superstructure 7.40 6.23 5.71 6.66 6.77 7.24 7.04 7.70

Weighted Average Condition Substructure 7.00 6.82 6.50 7.17 7.06 7.12 7.25 7.75

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

8.00

Co

nd

itio

n R

atin

g

FHWA 2011 Condition Ratings By Year Built

Trend Lines

Finally, a direct comparison has been made in Figures 10, 11 and 12 of all concrete bridge types, all steel bridge types, and all segmen-tal bridge types showing the percent of each group built from 1970 as it relates to all bridg-es built in that period with the percentage of all structurally deficient bridges, functionally obsolete bridges and percent of all deficient bridges. From these graphs it can be seen in

Figure 10 that the concrete bridges, including segmental, represent a larger proportion of bridges built in this period to the proportion they represent for deficient structures in this category.

Figure 11 shows that steel bridges have a higher percentage of deficient bridges to the total bridges built in their category.

Segmental Bridges represent a small portion of overall structures built but, by proportion, they are shown to be very robust and durable with a much higher percentage of bridges built to percentage of deficient structures in their category.

Page 9: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges | 7

Year Built

No. of Bridges

Condition RatingDeck Superstructure Substructure

4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 91971 01972 01973 1 1 1 11974 3 3 1 2 31975 1 1 1 119761977 13 2 3 8 1 7 4 1 4 91978 4 2 2 1 3 2 1 11979 1 1 1 11980 4 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 11981 6 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 3 11982 4 3 1 2 2 2 21983 10 5 5 4 1 2 3 1 2 71984 7 4 3 3 4 2 51985 1 1 1 11986 19 1 16 2 2 16 1 1 11 71987 3 3 1 2 1 1 11988 17 1 16 1 7 9 12 51989 24 8 14 2 9 15 3 15 61990 2 2 1 1 1 11991 17 7 10 4 12 1 3 9 51992 6 2 3 1 5 1 1 51993 17 1 12 4 1 1 3 12 3 7 71994 5 1 4 1 3 1 1 3 11995 2 2 2 21996 5 5 5 4 11997 7 1 6 4 3 6 11998 14 5 7 2 2 12 10 41999 9 8 1 8 1 1 82000 7 2 5 6 1 72001 16 1 11 4 3 13 1 1 10 42002 46 7 33 5 1 3 11 25 6 1 1 6 28 8 32003 11 1 9 1 9 2 2 6 32004 20 2 14 4 2 13 5 14 5 12005 21 2 10 7 2 12 7 2 9 10 22006 6 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 12007 11 1 4 5 1 1 3 6 1 1 4 5 12008 8 2 6 8 2 62009 10 7 1 2 7 1 2 7 1 22010 5 1 2 2 3 2 2 3Totals 363 6 18 64 221 45 9 5 1 0 1 10 70 204 63 9 0 2 5 39 214 90 13

Averages 6.9 6.9 7.2

Table 2: Summary of Bridge Ratings from Records Received in 2011

Inspection Report SummaryAnalysis of the provided bridge inspection reports utilized the bridge condition ratings defined in the FHWA’s manual, “Recording and Coding Guide for Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges.” In accor-dance with these guidelines, concrete decks are inspected for cracking, scaling, leaching, chloride contamination, pot holing, delamina-tion, and depth failures. Superstructures are inspected for signs of distress due to cracking, deterioration, section loss and malfunction, and misalignment of bearings.

Although the deck of a segmental concrete bridge is integral with the superstructure, it is rated as a deck only, and not as a superstruc-ture member.

Figure 13 summarizes the inspection report re-sults for deck, superstructure and substructure conditions for segmental concrete bridges built in the United States since 1970 and statistically evaluated in five year increments. The structural evaluation rating is an appraisal of the structure’s superstructure, substructure, and inventory load ratings.

The number of segmental bridges built in each year does not always agree with the sum of the bridges receiving condition ratings. Not every bridge is rated in all three categories and an inspection report was not received for every bridge.

The bridge survey ratings, shown in the compilation of NBI data in Figure 13, along with the data shown in Table 2, illustrate that segmental bridges constructed during the past 40 years have a high level of durability.

Overall Bridge Conditions The inspection reports indicate segmental superstructures are performing very well over time, with condition ratings of 5 or above for all but the seven bridges reported as structur-ally deficient. More importantly, 95 percent of the bridge condition ratings are 6 or better and 75 percent of the bridges have condition ratings of 7 or better. The superstructure con-dition ratings of the 363 reported segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges averaged a rating of 6.9.

The older bridges reported in the survey con-tinue to fare well. The oldest bridge, the John F. Kennedy Causeway, completed in 1973, has deck and superstructure condition maintain-ing ratings of 6. This bridge crosses the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and is exposed to an aggressive marine environment. The Califor-nia Pine Valley Bridge, completed in 1974, continues to fare very well with a superstruc-ture condition rating of 7, indicating that this bridge is in very good condition.

The eight Vail Pass bridges in Colorado, completed in 1977, all have superstructure condition ratings of 6 or 7. The Genesee River Bridge in Rochester, New York, a cast-in-place segmental structure completed in 1981, had a condition rating of 8 in 2004. These bridges exist in harsh winter environments with freezing and thawing conditions, coupled with de-icing salt applications. The “satisfactory,” “good,” and “very good” condition ratings for these bridges confirm that prestressed con-crete segmental bridges are high performing in aggressive environments and a preferred solution for a durable and aesthetic structure.

Page 10: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

8 | ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

R,S R(t)

S(t)

Distribution of R(t)

Mean service life

Service life density

Failure probabilityPf

TimeDistribution of S(t)

Targetservice life

R(t) - Resistance Function S(t) – Loading Function

Figure 14: Schematic Illustrating the Concept of Probabilistic Service Life

ConclusionsThe 2011 National Bridge Inventory (NBI) inspec-tion data summarized in this report shows that concrete segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges continue to perform well. This perfor-mance is reflected in the average superstructure condition rating of 6.9 on the NBI scale, indicating good condition. From the 363 segmental bridges of this study, only seven were noted as struc-turally deficient. Bridges constructed during the past 40 years using other materials and methods have experienced a much higher percentage of structural deficiency. In general, the service life of segmental and concrete cable-stayed bridges, based on bridge inspection data, exceeds 100 years, providing for low life-cycle costs.

Bridge Wearing Surface SurveyInformation on wearing surface treatments in Appendices A and B of this report indicates that these treatments vary widely from state to state. The American Segmental Bridge Institute recommendations on use of overlays and groov-ing and grinding are summarized below. These recommendations were developed considering experience in construction of segmental concrete bridges over the past 40 years, as well as documented excellent performance of segmental concrete bridge decks.

Additional protection against penetration of chlorides and corrosion of reinforcement is considered to be necessary for all bridge decks exposed to freeze-thaw cycles and application of de-icing chemicals. For all types of segmental bridges (precast or cast-in-place), it is ASBI’s recommendation that this additional protection should be provided by addition of 1 inch or 1½ inches of concrete cover, and that this additional cover should be placed monolithically with the deck concrete. This is considered to be the most economical and most effective means of providing the necessary corrosion protection for segmental bridges in aggressive environments. This procedure also eliminates the possibility of overlay delamination.

It is further recommended that the original superstructure design should allow for future re-moval of the top 1 inch of the deck concrete and

replacement with a new 2 inch overlay (consider future dead load in the design). The need for removal of the top 1 inch of deck concrete, and a new 2 inch overlay, can be based on measure-ment of chloride penetration into the integral overlay. Use of silica fume and other supple-mentary cementitious materials in the concrete mix to decrease permeability has been shown to be an effective means of minimizing chloride penetration into concrete, providing additional durability properties to the structure.

Many precast segmental bridges have been built conforming to normal rideability specifications us-ing the as-cast deck surface as the riding surface. However, requiring an additional ½ inch deck concrete for grooving and grinding is recommend-ed to achieve rideability specifications for either precast or cast-in-place segmental bridges.

The Acosta Bridge in Jacksonville, Florida, a cast-in-place balanced cantilever bridge with a main span of 630 ft., met rideability standards with 3/8 inch provided for grooving and grinding. However, the experience of some bridge owners indicates that ½ inch would not be sufficient for grooving and grinding for cast-in-place balanced canti-lever construction and a larger allowance may be appropriate. For precast balanced cantilever bridges, an allowance of ½ inch for grooving and grinding id considered adequate.

Assessment and Reliabil ityThe service life and reliability of Segmental Bridges can be addressed utilizing two methods, the empirical or probabilistic approach.

For the empirical method Figure 13 (as previously shown on page 6) can be used to predict a theo-retical service life by utilizing the trends or trend lines of the declination rates of these structures. Many of the states utilize trends associated with the deterioration of their structures to predict future inspection, interventions and maintenance needs. From the trend line associated with the condition rating for the superstructures of seg-mental bridges it can be seen that the condition rating of the superstructure declines approxi-mately 1.5 points over 40 years. Based on this performance and noting that a new segmental bridge enters the systems at a superstructure condition rating of 8 or above, a service life of 106 years can be easily interpolated, noting a ser-vice life of 133 years calculated for bridges that enter the system at a condition rating of 9. This average trend line could also be applied to ex-isting structures like John F. Kennedy Causeway

which, at 40 years of age, has a current condition rating of 6. At the current rate, this would indi-cate an additional 53 years of service life before the condition rating reaches a 4 or becomes rated as structurally deficient. It should be noted that the superstructure condition rating for the John F. Kennedy Causeway has not changed over the last five years and has remained at a 6.

The probabilistic6,7 (Figure 14) approach initially is not dependent on the field assessments but relies on the predicted resistance of the materials and systems of an individual structure as compared to the deterioration process of the structures environment (e.g. corrosion of reinforcement, alkali-silica reaction (ASR), etc.). Once the initial predictions are made and plotted, the distribution for the resistance factor and distribution for the environmental deterioration component are applied. As the structure ages these assumptions can be checked, compared, and correlated to make any adjustments to service life calculations.

Since the probabilistic approach to service life de-sign can be addressed during the design phase, it

can be used to adjust cover levels with different blends of material to provide the most econom-ical solution for a given service life. Additional work is now underway to calibrate building codes and specifications to determine the effective service life based on prescriptive cover depths, different binders (portland cement, supplemental cementitious materials such as fly ash, slag, and silica fume), allowable water-cement ratio’s and environmental conditions of the structure.

LIST OF REFERENCES1. Wikipedia – Segmental Bridges - http://en.wikipedia.

org/wiki/Segmental_bridge#History 2. James M Barker, Construction Techniques for Segmen-

tal Concrete Bridges, PCI JOURNAL/July-August 19803. Miller, Maurice, Durability Survey of Segmental

Concrete Bridges, ASBI, 1994, 1999.4. Brett H Pielstick, Durability Survey of Segmental

Concrete Bridges, ASBI 20075. Federal Highway Administration, Recording and Coding

Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges. 1995 Report FHWA-PD-96- 001 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.cfm

6. fib Bulletin 34, Model Code for Service Life Design, Task Group 5.6 Peter Schiessl Convener February 2006.

7. fib Bulletin 59, Condition Control and Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Task Group 5.8 Christoph Gehlen - Convener May 2011

Page 11: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

NBI Inspection Data for Concrete Segmental and Cable-Stayed Bridges Listed Alphabetically by State

Appendix A

Page 12: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A1

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

1Al

abam

a12

835

1982

Daulp

hin Is

land

Nov-1

07

66

12

Alab

ama

1543

019

91Co

chra

ne -

Afric

anto

wn

Jan-

116

66

23

Calif

ornia

57-6

92-L

1974

Pine V

alley

EBAu

g-08

78

76

4Ca

lifor

nia21

-49

1977

Napa

Vall

ey ov

er N

apa R

iver

Jan-

007

87

95

Calif

ornia

32c0

076

1978

Parro

ts Fe

rry B

ridge

Four

mile

s sou

th of

rout

e 4Fe

b-10

67

66

6Ca

lifor

nia24

-011

619

78El

Cam

ino A

ve S

acra

men

toDe

c-08

67

76

7Ca

lifor

nia57

c067

619

96M

onte

zum

a Roa

d San

Dieg

oM

ar-1

07

77

08

Calif

ornia

55C0

623

1994

BNSF

Am

trak M

etro

Link

/ El

Paso

Rd

Jun-

087

87

09

Calif

ornia

57 10

5419

92Ro

ute 7

8 San

Ysa

ble C

reek

May

-09

68

74

10Ca

lifor

nia10

0299

20

09SO

UTH

FORK

EEL R

IVER

Ju

l-09

78

70

11Ca

lifor

nia13

C002

220

07GO

ODYE

ARS

CREE

K

Au

g-08

75

70

12Ca

lifor

nia28

0153

R C2

220

07UP

BNS

F AM

TRAK

SUI

SUN

BANo

v-09

78

72

13Ca

lifor

nia30

0053

2009

GARD

NER

LANE

Oc

t-09

78

70

14Ca

lifor

nia30

0054

2009

MUR

PHYS

GRA

DE R

OAD

Oct-0

97

87

015

Calif

ornia

30 00

5520

09PE

NSTO

CK A

QUED

UCT

Oct-0

97

87

016

Calif

ornia

30 00

5620

09AN

GELS

CRE

EK

Oct-0

97

87

017

Calif

ornia

33C0

239R

2009

ARRO

YO D

EL V

ALLE

Oct-0

97

87

018

Calif

ornia

34-0

007L

2008

San F

rans

isco-

Oakla

nd B

ay B

ridge

Sky

way

Jun-

087

87

519

Calif

ornia

34-0

007R

2008

San F

rans

isco-

Oakla

nd B

ay B

ridge

Sky

way

Sep-

087

87

520

Color

ado

F-11-

AK19

77M

iller C

reek

EB I-

70Au

g-08

77

76

21Co

lorad

oF-1

1-AL

1977

Mille

r Cre

ek W

B I-7

0Au

g-08

77

76

22Co

lorad

oF-1

1-AM

1977

Blac

k Gor

e Cre

ek I-

70 EB

Jan-

006

66

623

Color

ado

F-11-

AN19

77Bl

ack G

ore C

reek

I-70

WB

Aug-

087

67

624

Color

ado

F-11-

AU19

77Co

Rd,

Gore

Cre

ek I-

70 EB

Aug-

087

66

625

Color

ado

F-11-

AV19

77Co

Rd,

Gore

Cre

ek I-

70 W

BAu

g-08

77

76

26Co

lorad

oF-1

1-AW

1977

I-70 E

B 13

.5 m

iles J

CT S

H91

Aug-

086

66

627

Color

ado

F-11-

AX19

77I-7

0 WB

9.7 M

iles E

of S

H 24

Aug-

087

77

628

Color

ado

F-07-

AK19

86I-7

0 WBN

DAp

r-08

77

86

29Co

lorad

oF-0

7-AL

1986

I-70 W

BND

Apr-0

87

77

630

Color

ado

F-07-

AN19

86I-7

0 WBN

DAp

r-08

87

76

31Co

lorad

oF-0

8-AA

1986

I-70 A

cces

s Rd G

rizzly

Cre

ekAp

r-08

88

86

32Co

lorad

oF-0

8-AB

1986

I-70 G

rizzly

Cre

ekM

ay-0

87

77

633

Color

ado

F-08-

AV19

89I-7

0 WBN

DAp

r-08

87

76

34Co

lorad

oF-0

8-BH

1989

Frenc

h Cre

ekAp

r-08

77

76

35Co

lorad

oF-0

8-AR

1991

I-70 C

olora

do R

iver /

UP R

RM

ay-0

87

77

636

Color

ado

F-08-

BJ19

93I-7

0 Han

ging L

ake

Apr-0

87

78

637

Color

ado

H-09

-U20

05M

AROO

N CR

EEK

Asp

en

May

-09

88

86

38Co

nnec

ticut

0620

0A19

93Fe

rry R

oad C

onn.

Rive

r NB

I-95

Jul-0

86

56

639

Conn

ectic

ut06

200B

1993

Ferry

Roa

d Con

n. Ri

ver S

B I-9

5Ju

l-08

64

66

40Flo

rida

9000

9419

81US

-1 Lo

ng K

ey

Aug-

097

64

241

Florid

a90

0098

1982

US-1

Cha

nnel

#5Fe

b-09

77

71

42Flo

rida

9001

0119

82US

-1 M

oser

Cha

nnel

Aug-

098

66

143

Florid

a90

0117

1983

US-1

Nile

s Cha

nnel

May

-09

76

71

44Flo

rida

8706

0219

84SR

821 R

amp t

o I-7

5 NB

Sep-

087

77

045

Florid

a87

0643

1986

Ram

p to I

-75 N

BOc

t-08

77

70

46Flo

rida

8706

4419

86I-7

5 NB

to S

R 82

1Oc

t-08

77

70

47Flo

rida

8706

4519

86SR

821 R

amp t

o I-7

5 SB

Oct-0

87

77

0

Page 13: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A2

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

48Flo

rida

8706

4619

86I-7

5 SB

Oct-0

87

77

049

Florid

a87

0647

1986

I-75 N

BOc

t-08

77

80

50Flo

rida

8603

8619

86SR

84 EB

I-59

5/ I-

75 In

terch

ange

Jan-

107

78

051

Florid

a86

0387

1986

I-595

WB

to I-

75SB

Inte

rchan

geJa

n-10

76

70

52Flo

rida

8603

8819

86I-7

5 NB

to I-

595E

B Int

erch

ange

Aug-

096

68

053

Florid

a86

0389

1986

I-75 I

ndian

Trac

e (SW

14)

Oct-0

97

78

054

Florid

a86

0385

1986

I-75S

B to

I-59

5EB

Inter

chan

geJa

n-10

77

70

55Flo

rida

8604

3419

87SB

US-

1 to S

t Lau

derd

ale A

irpor

tM

ar-0

87

77

056

Florid

a86

0510

1988

I-595

WB

to 86

9 NB

Inter

chan

geAu

g-09

77

80

57Flo

rida

8605

1519

8886

9 SB

to I-

75 S

B Int

erch

ange

Aug-

097

68

058

Florid

a86

0516

1988

869 t

o I-7

5 SB

Inter

chan

geFe

b-08

76

70

59Flo

rida

8605

1719

8886

9 SB

to I-

75 S

B 59

5 Int

erch

ange

Aug-

097

77

060

Florid

a86

0518

1988

869 S

b to I

-75 S

B 59

5 Int

erch

ange

Jan-

107

67

061

Florid

a86

0519

1988

I-75 N

B to

869 N

B Int

erch

ange

Aug-

097

78

062

Florid

a86

0520

2002

SB S

R A1

A &

EB S

R 85

8

Apr-0

98

88

063

Florid

a86

0476

1988

US 44

1 NB

to I-

595 W

B Int

erch

ange

Dec-0

97

57

064

Florid

a86

0477

1988

I-595

EB to

SR7

NB

595 I

nter

chan

geDe

c-09

77

70

65Flo

rida

8605

0919

89SB

869 t

o NB

I-75 I

nter

chan

geAu

g-09

77

70

66Flo

rida

8605

1119

89SB

869 t

o EB

I-595

Inte

rchan

geFe

b-08

76

80

67Flo

rida

7205

1819

89Na

poleo

n Bro

war

d Brid

ge (D

ames

Point

)Oc

t-09

76

76

68Flo

rida

8605

1219

89I-7

5 Sb t

o 896

NB

Inter

chan

geFe

b-08

76

80

69Flo

rida

7205

7019

91Ac

osta

Brid

ge S

BAu

g-08

77

70

70Flo

rida

7205

7119

91Ac

osta

Brid

ge N

BJa

n-10

76

70

71Flo

rida

8750

0019

91Po

rt Bl

vd IC

WFe

b-10

77

79

72Flo

rida

8750

0119

91Po

rt Bl

vd IC

WFe

b-10

77

71

73Flo

rida

5700

9119

93SR

293 C

hocta

wat

chee

Bay

Oct-0

87

77

074

Florid

a89

0151

1997

US-1

/ SR

-707

SB

over

St L

ucie

Rive

r - R

oose

velt

Bridg

eJu

n-08

78

70

75Flo

rida

8901

5219

97US

-1 /

SR-7

07 N

B ov

er S

t Luc

ie Ri

ver -

Roo

seve

lt Br

idge

Jun-

087

87

076

Florid

a79

0174

1997

SR 43

9 Sea

bree

ze W

B ov

er IW

COc

t-08

77

70

77Flo

rida

7901

7519

97SR

439 S

eabr

eeze

WB

over

IWC

Oct-0

86

77

078

Florid

a86

0622

1998

17th

Stre

et C

ausw

ay

Aug-

108

88

079

Florid

a86

0623

1998

17th

Stre

et C

ausw

ay

Aug-

108

88

080

Florid

a58

0174

1999

SR 28

1 - G

arco

n Poin

t - S

anta

Ros

a Bay

Brid

geAp

r-09

77

70

81Flo

rida

8901

5820

01SR

A1A

EB ov

er S

t Luc

ie Ri

ver -

Evan

s Cra

ry Br

idge

Jun-

098

78

082

Florid

a89

0160

2001

SR A

1A EB

over

St L

ucie

Rive

r - Ev

ans C

rary

Bridg

eJu

n-09

87

80

83Flo

rida

7901

8720

01US

92 B

road

way

Brid

ge ov

er IW

C W

BM

ar-0

97

77

984

Florid

a79

0188

2001

US 92

Bro

adw

ay B

ridge

over

IWC

EBM

ar-0

97

77

985

Florid

a86

0630

2002

I-595

& U

S 1 t

o Ft L

aude

rdale

Airp

ort

Nov-0

97

88

086

Florid

a86

0631

2002

Entra

nce t

o Ft L

aude

rdale

Airp

ort

Nov-0

97

99

087

Florid

a86

0632

2002

Ft La

uder

dale

Airp

ort t

o I-5

95 &

US

1No

v-09

88

80

88Flo

rida

8606

3320

02Ft

Laud

erda

le Ai

rpor

t Re-

Entry

Ram

pNo

v-09

88

80

89Flo

rida

8606

3420

02Ft

Laud

erda

le Ai

rpor

t Re-

Entry

Ram

pNo

v-09

88

90

90Flo

rida

8606

3520

02Ft

Laud

erda

le Ai

rpor

t Re-

Entry

Ram

pNo

v-09

98

90

91Flo

rida

9304

7720

03I-9

5 SB

to S

R-80

PB In

terch

ange

Dec-0

97

88

092

Florid

a93

0478

2003

SR-8

0 Ram

p NB

I-95 P

B Int

erch

ange

Dec-0

98

88

093

Florid

a93

0479

2004

I-95 S

B to

PBIA

PB In

terch

nage

Dec-0

97

77

094

Florid

a93

0480

2004

PBIA

to I-

95 S

BDe

c-09

77

80

Page 14: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A3

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

95Flo

rida

9304

8120

04I-9

5 SB

to PB

IA PB

Inte

rchna

geDe

c-09

78

80

96Flo

rida

9304

8220

04I-9

5 NB

to PB

IA PB

Inte

rchna

geDe

c-09

88

90

97Flo

rida

9304

8320

04PB

IA R

amp t

o I-9

5 NB

Dec-0

97

78

098

Florid

a93

0484

2004

PBIA

Ram

p to I

-95 S

BDe

c-09

88

80

99Flo

rida

4601

1220

04Ha

thaw

ay U

S 98

Oct-0

97

77

010

0Flo

rida

4601

1320

03Ha

thaw

ay U

S 98

Oct-0

97

77

010

1Flo

rida

1701

7620

03RI

NGLIN

G CA

USEW

AY S

R 78

9 ove

r ICW

Jan-

107

78

010

2Flo

rida

8709

7220

05SR

-25 o

ver O

keec

hobe

e Rd

Nov-1

08

88

610

3Flo

rida

7206

4020

05I-9

5 NB

to I-

295 N

B Ja

x Sou

th In

terch

ange

Ram

p I-2

Apr-0

87

78

010

4Flo

rida

7206

4120

05I-2

95 S

B to

I-95

NB

Jax S

outh

Inte

rchna

ge R

amp H

-1Ja

n-10

77

80

105

Florid

a72

0639

2004

I-95 S

B to

9A Ja

x Sou

th In

terch

ange

Ram

p J-2

Apr-0

87

78

010

6Flo

rida

1502

4420

05CL

EARW

ATER

MEM

ORIA

L CSW

Y. SR

60Ja

n-10

77

70

107

Florid

a10

0800

2006

SR-6

18 (C

ROSS

TOW

N) Le

roy S

elman

Exps

wy

Aug-

087

78

010

8Flo

rida

1008

0620

06SR

618 (

CROS

STOW

N) Le

roy S

elman

Exps

wy

Aug-

087

78

010

9Flo

rida

1008

1220

05CR

OSST

OWN

(SR-

618)

Lero

y Selm

an Ex

psw

yAu

g-08

88

80

110

Florid

a93

0506

2004

Roya

l Par

k Brid

geNo

v-10

88

70

111

Flroid

a93

0507

2004

Roya

l Par

k Brid

geNo

v-10

88

70

112

Florid

a72

0761

2010

I/95 I

-295

Nor

th Fl

yove

rJu

l-10

88

80

113

Florid

a89

0150

2006

Erne

st Ly

ons B

ridge

Ju

n-09

99

90

114

Geor

gia12

7-50

20-0

2002

Brun

swick

- Si

dney

Lanie

r SR

25 (U

S 17

)M

ar-1

17

78

011

5Ge

orgia

051-

0169

-019

91Sa

vann

ah -

Talm

adge

Mem

orial

Brid

ge S

R 40

4 Spu

r (US

17)

Jan-

117

77

011

6Ha

waii

0030

00H3

0200

423

1995

HALA

WA

VAL V

IAD

IBFe

b-09

77

72

117

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0042

419

95HA

LAW

A VA

LL V

IA O

BFe

b-09

77

72

118

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0066

019

94W

INDW

ARD

VIAD

T IB

Feb-

097

77

211

9Ha

waii

0030

00H3

0200

661

1994

WIN

DWAR

D VI

ADT O

B Fe

b-09

77

72

120

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0084

119

96H3

-KAN

EOHE

IC IB

No

v-09

77

72

121

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0084

219

96H3

-KAN

EOHE

IC O

B

Nov-0

97

78

212

2Ha

waii

0030

00H3

0200

843

1996

KANE

OHE I

C RA

MP B

No

v-09

77

72

123

Idaho

0000

0000

0016

896

1991

Benn

ett B

ay B

ridge

Cou

er D

alene

’M

ay-0

96

66

312

4Illi

nois

1010

1331

0666

1980

I-39 &

I-51

SB

Kish

wau

kee R

iver B

ridge

May

-10

66

76

125

Illino

is10

1013

4106

8019

81I-3

9 & I-

51 N

B Ki

shw

auke

e Rive

r Brid

geM

ay-1

06

67

612

6Illi

nois

7501

2222

690

1988

I-72 E

B ov

er Ill

inois

Rive

rAp

r-10

76

79

127

Illino

is75

0123

2371

519

88I-7

2 WB

over

Illino

is Ri

ver

Apr-1

06

67

912

8Ind

iana

6100

176

1975

High

Brid

ge R

d ove

r Sug

ar C

reek

Jul-0

87

88

612

9Ind

iana

4271

519

77I-7

0 WB

Ram

p I-4

65 S

BJu

l-08

55

73

130

Indian

a17

560

1977

SR 47

over

Turke

y Run

Jun-

075

67

313

1Ind

iana

4995

519

77I-7

0 WB

toI-4

65 S

BSe

p-08

66

73

132

Indian

a26

790

1978

US 13

8(SR

26) o

ver W

abas

h Rive

r IL

Nov-0

75

56

313

3Ind

iana

3302

519

83Ra

mp B

over

Con

rail

Jun-

084

16

313

4Ind

iana

3302

619

83Ra

mp -

D EB

over

Rile

y Roa

dJu

n-08

41

73

135

Indian

a33

027

1983

Ram

p C EB

over

Rile

y Roa

dJu

n-08

41

73

136

Indian

a33

028

1983

Ram

p A W

B Ju

n-08

42

63

137

Indian

a33

029

1983

SR 12

over

cana

lJu

n-08

41

43

138

Indian

a49

0023

619

84W

est S

t ove

r IW

C Ca

nal

Sep-

086

67

113

9Ind

iana

4900

217

1986

Indian

a/M

ichiga

n ove

r IW

C Ca

nal

Sep-

087

77

114

0Ind

iana

6683

1992

SR 26

EB ov

er W

abas

h Rive

r, CSX

Dec-0

66

77

314

1Ind

iana

6685

1992

SR 26

WB

over

Wab

ash R

iver, C

SXDe

c-06

67

73

142

Indian

a33

163

2000

SR 91

2 EB

to I-

80 EB

Jun-

096

77

1

Page 15: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A4

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

143

Indian

a33

166

2000

SR 01

2 WB

to I-

80 W

BJu

n-09

67

71

144

Indian

a41

966

2005

I-70 W

BL O

N RA

MP

Aug-

088

88

314

5Ind

iana

4196

820

05I-7

0 EBL

OFF

RAM

P Au

g-08

88

83

146

Indian

a41

972

2005

I-70 E

BL O

N RA

MP

Aug-

088

88

314

7Iow

a25

301

1986

IA 2

over

Miss

ouri

Rive

rOc

t-08

77

84

148

Kent

ucky

037B

0007

4N

19

79E-

W C

onne

ctor -

KENT

UCKY

RIV

ERSe

p-08

77

81

149

Kent

ucky

007B

0013

7N

19

86Sk

yland

Dr. o

ver U

S 25

E M

ay-0

87

76

415

0Ke

ntuc

ky09

8B00

184N

1987

Ram

p B ov

er U

S 23

Feb-

097

78

415

1M

aine

2262

1983

Wisc

asse

t Brid

ge -

Shee

psco

t Rive

r - U

S Ro

ute 1

Nov-1

07

77

315

2M

aryla

nd20

0000

A-C-

0101

019

77Fre

drick

St o

ver U

S 40

and C

SXDe

c-09

76

61

153

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6392

82FD

OTNB

I20

02US

1 R

AMP T

C

Mar

-10

66

73

154

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6392

8DGD

OTNB

I20

02US

1 R

AMP T

C

Jul-0

97

76

315

5M

assa

chus

etts

B163

928Q

GDOT

NBI

2002

US 1

RAM

P TC

Ju

l-09

87

83

156

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6392

8XUD

OTNB

I20

02US

1 R

AMP T

C

Jul-0

97

78

315

7M

assa

chus

etts

B163

928X

WDO

TNBI

2002

US 1

RAM

P TC

M

ar-1

06

66

315

8M

assa

chus

etts

B166

0090

0DOT

NBI

2003

I 93 N

B

Jan-

107

77

315

9M

assa

chus

etts

B166

0090

1DOT

NBI

2002

I 93 N

B

Feb-

107

77

316

0M

assa

chus

etts

B166

009P

MDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP S

A - C

NDe

c-09

77

73

161

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6601

8YW

DOTN

BI20

02I 9

3 SB

Ja

n-10

77

63

162

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6601

8YXD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 SB

M

ar-1

07

67

316

3M

assa

chus

etts

B166

038D

EDOT

NBI

2005

I 93 R

AMP S

ACN

M

ar-1

06

77

316

4M

assa

chus

etts

B166

038D

FDOT

NBI

2005

I 93 R

AMP S

ACN

M

ar-1

06

77

316

5M

assa

chus

etts

B166

039P

FDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP S

A-CN

M

ar-1

06

77

316

6M

assa

chus

etts

B166

068Y

UDOT

NBI

1999

I 93 R

AMP N

S

May

-10

77

63

167

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6607

8YPD

OTNB

I19

99I 9

3 RAM

P SN

Ju

n-09

87

73

168

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6610

8Y6D

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP C

T

Mar

-10

66

73

169

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6610

8YCD

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP C

T

Jun-

098

78

317

0M

assa

chus

etts

B166

108Y

DDOT

NBI

2001

US 1

RAM

P CT

Ju

n-09

77

73

171

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6610

8YFD

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP C

T

Mar

-10

76

73

172

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6611

8XYD

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP S

T

Jun-

098

77

317

3M

assa

chus

etts

B166

118Y

3DOT

NBI

2001

US 1

RAM

P ST

M

ay-1

07

77

317

4M

assa

chus

etts

B166

569A

JDOT

NBI

2000

I 93 S

B

Feb-

117

77

317

5M

assa

chus

etts

B166

569N

3DOT

NBI

2000

I 93 S

B

Apr-0

97

77

317

6M

assa

chus

etts

B166

569Q

6DOT

NBI

2000

I 93 S

B

Jun-

097

77

317

7M

assa

chus

etts

B166

569Q

7DOT

NBI

2000

I 93 S

B

Apr-0

97

77

317

8M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589B

0DOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Jan-

106

67

317

9M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589Q

WDO

TNBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Dec-0

97

77

318

0M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589Q

XDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Dec-0

97

77

318

1M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589Q

YDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Dec-0

97

77

318

2M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589R

MDO

TNBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Jan-

107

77

318

3M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589R

NDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Jan-

107

77

318

4M

assa

chus

etts

B166

5982

NDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP X

X

Jan-

106

55

318

5M

assa

chus

etts

B166

598M

DDOT

NBI

2001

I 93 R

AMP X

X

Jan-

107

66

318

6M

assa

chus

etts

B166

599Q

5DOT

NBI

2005

COM

B I9

0&I93

RMP L

L&AM

TK I

93 R

AMP X

X M

ar-1

17

78

918

7M

assa

chus

etts

B166

618Q

XDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 N

B

Jun-

097

77

318

8M

assa

chus

etts

B166

618Q

YDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 N

B

Apr-0

97

67

318

9M

assa

chus

etts

B166

618R

0DOT

NBI

2002

I 93 N

B

Mar

-10

66

63

190

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

8TM

DOTN

BI20

02I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ja

n-10

76

73

Page 16: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A5

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

191

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

8TPD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ap

r-09

77

73

192

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

8TTD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ap

r-09

77

83

193

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

9Q3D

OTNB

I20

06I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ju

n-10

66

73

194

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

9UTD

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ju

n-10

77

73

195

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

9V0D

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ju

n-10

76

73

196

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

9Q4D

OTNB

I20

05CO

MB

I90&

I93RM

P LL&

AMTK

I 93

RAM

P K

Mar

-11

77

79

197

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6665

9AYD

OTNB

I20

03I 9

3 RAM

P AS

Fe

b-10

77

73

198

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6666

9QRD

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P FX

M

ar-1

07

77

319

9M

assa

chus

etts

B166

688M

CDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP X

XE

Dec-0

97

77

320

0M

assa

chus

etts

B166

6982

HDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 H

OV R

AMP E

B Ju

n-10

65

73

201

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6669

82JD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 HOV

RAM

P EB

Jan-

107

77

320

2M

assa

chus

etts

B166

708T

WDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP K

K

Mar

-10

66

73

203

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6670

9URD

OTNB

I20

03I 9

3 RAM

P KK

Ju

n-09

77

73

204

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6671

8TLD

OTNB

I20

01I 9

3 RAM

P MW

Apr-0

97

77

320

5M

assa

chus

etts

B166

719P

WDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP M

W

Ju

n-09

77

73

206

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6676

9QLD

OTNB

I20

03I 9

3 RAM

P CC

Ju

l-10

77

73

207

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6681

82PD

OTNB

I20

02CO

MB

I90 R

PS&H

OV&A

MTK

HW

Y F

RONT

AGE R

DJu

n-09

77

73

208

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6681

8QVD

OTNB

I20

02HW

Y F

RONT

AGE R

D M

ar-1

17

67

320

9M

assa

chus

etts

B166

828M

5DOT

NBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP L

L

Dec-1

06

57

321

0M

assa

chus

etts

C010

498Y

HDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP T

S

Apr-1

07

76

321

1M

ichiga

n54

1540

1400

0B01

019

83US

-131

SB

5 mi S

outh

Big

Rapid

sM

ay-1

07

67

212

Mich

igan

5415

4014

000B

020

1982

US-1

31 N

B 5 m

i Sou

th B

ig Ra

pids

May

-10

77

721

3M

ichiga

n73

1731

1200

0B03

119

80I-7

5 NB

At Zi

lwau

kee

Oct-0

96

77

214

Mich

igan

7317

3112

000B

032

1984

I-75 S

B at

Zilw

auke

eOc

t-09

67

721

5M

ichiga

n73

1731

1200

0B03

819

84I-7

5 SB

RAM

P at Z

ilwau

kee

Oct-0

97

77

216

Mich

igan

8218

2022

000S

436

1984

M-3

9 SB

RAM

P K in

Alle

n Par

kAu

g-10

77

621

7M

innes

ota

2740

920

08Sa

int A

ntho

ny Fa

lls B

ridge

New

I-35

W S

B

Oct-1

18

88

221

8M

innes

ota

2741

020

08Sa

int A

ntho

ny Fa

lls B

ridge

New

I-35

W N

B

Oct-1

18

88

221

9M

innes

ota

2761

119

80Ply

mou

th A

venu

eNo

v-11

71

85

220

Minn

esot

a62

555A

1998

Wab

asha

Stre

et N

BAu

g-11

78

84

221

Minn

esot

a62

555B

1998

Wab

asha

Stre

et S

BSe

p-11

78

84

222

Minn

esot

a82

856

2006

I-494

WB

Oct-1

18

88

422

3M

innes

ota

8285

520

10I-4

94 EB

Oct-1

18

88

422

4M

innes

ota

27V6

520

07M

N 12

1 NB

Apr-1

19

99

422

5M

innes

ota

27V6

620

07I-3

5W R

amp

Aug-

118

88

422

6M

innes

ota

27V7

320

07I-3

5W R

amp

Aug-

118

88

422

7M

innes

ota

27V7

520

08I-3

5W R

amp

Aug-

118

88

422

8M

innes

ota

27V7

620

08TH

62 W

BAu

g-11

88

84

229

Minn

esot

a27

V79

2008

I-35W

Ram

pAu

g-11

88

84

230

Miss

issipp

i11

0011

0024

0001

019

88I-1

10 ov

er R

R an

d Kee

gan B

atou

Dec-0

97

77

123

1M

ississ

ippi

1700

1100

2400

00A

1988

I-110

Inne

r Loo

p ove

r US

90De

c-09

77

71

232

Miss

issipp

i17

0011

0024

0000

B19

88I-1

10 O

uter

Loop

over

US

90De

c-09

77

71

233

Miss

issipp

i17

0011

0024

0008

A19

88I-1

10 O

ff Ra

mp o

ver D

ivisio

n St

Dec-0

97

78

123

4M

ississ

ippi

1700

1100

2400

08B

1988

I-110

On R

amp o

ver D

ivisio

n ST

Dec-0

97

78

123

5M

ississ

ippi

3100

6130

3000

450

1987

SR 61

3 Esc

ataw

pa R

ierAu

g-08

76

69

236

Miss

issipp

i55

7048

3P00

0000

020

01Na

tches

Trac

e Par

kway

- FH

WA

Dec-0

87

77

123

7M

ississ

ippi

SA43

0000

0000

051

2008

Lazy

Roa

dNo

v-09

88

81

238

Miss

ouri

2575

1981

IS-1

70 E

to IS

-70 E

Oct-1

07

66

0

Page 17: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A6

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

239

Miss

ouri

1213

219

99Cr

eve C

oeur

Lake

Brid

ge A

SBI 2

000 E

rnes

t Pet

zoid

Aug-

107

77

024

0M

issou

ri33

066

2010

MIS

SISS

IPPI R

VR, N

. BRO

A (Pr

estre

ssed

Con

crete

App

roac

h) St

eel C

ont.

Jun-

107

99

024

1M

issou

ri34

9319

85US

24 W

MIS

SISS

IPPI R

VRAu

g-10

66

60

242

Miss

ouri

3497

1994

US 67

S -

RRJu

n-10

67

50

243

Miss

ouri

4089

1997

MO

34 E

- AQU

Mar

-10

78

70

244

Miss

ouri

3285

420

10IS

29 S

- Le

vee

Jan-

109

99

024

5Ne

bras

kaS0

02 50

816

1983

N2 ov

er th

e Miss

ouri

Rive

rOc

t-08

77

74

246

Neva

da

0305

-B18

6819

92Ho

over

Dam

Byp

ass

Oct-0

95

77

624

7Ne

vada

I 214

119

99Ra

mp I

-15 S

to 95

E Sp

aghe

tti In

terch

nage

Feb-

097

77

124

8Ne

vada

I 939

1999

Ram

p US

95 S

W to

I-15

S S

pagh

etti

Inter

chan

geJa

n-09

77

71

249

Neva

daI 9

4019

99I01

5 Ram

p NW

Spa

ghet

ti Int

erch

ange

Jan-

097

77

125

0Ne

vada

I 904

R19

99Ra

mp N

MLK

Blvd

Spa

ghet

ti Int

erch

ange

Jan-

097

77

125

1Ne

w M

exico

0000

0000

0009

954

2002

I-25 N

B to

I-40

WB

Big I

Inte

rchan

geNo

v-09

77

71

252

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

520

02I-2

5 SB

to I-

40 W

B Bi

g I In

terch

ange

Nov-0

97

67

125

3Ne

w M

exico

0000

0000

0009

957

2002

I-40 W

B to

I-25

SB

Big I

Inte

rchna

geOc

t-09

77

71

254

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

820

02I-2

5 SB

to I-

40 EB

Big

I Inte

rchan

geOc

t-09

77

75

255

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

920

02I-2

5 NB

to I-

40 EB

Big

I Inte

rchan

geNo

v-09

77

71

256

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0996

020

02I-4

0 EB

Ram

p to I

-25 S

B Bi

g I In

terch

nage

Nov-0

97

77

125

7Ne

w M

exico

0000

0000

0009

961

2002

I-40 E

B Ra

mp t

o I-2

5 NB

Big I

Inte

rchna

geNo

v-09

77

71

258

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0996

220

02I-4

0 Wb R

amp t

o I-2

5 NB

Big I

Inte

rchna

geNo

v-09

77

71

259

New

Jersy

1223

150

2005

Victo

ry Br

dge -

Rar

itan R

iver N

J-35

Sep-

097

77

126

0Ne

w Je

rsy13

1516

920

09Sh

rew

sbur

y Rive

r - N

J-36

Dec-0

99

99

626

1Ne

w Yo

rk40

7054

119

81I-3

90 ov

er G

enes

see R

iver

Jul-1

07

78

3226

2Ne

w Yo

rk40

7054

219

81I-3

90 ov

er G

enes

see R

iver

Oct-1

08

77

3226

3Ne

w Yo

rk10

7556

920

01M

R 14

C ov

er R

TE I-

278 &

Mar

cy A

veSe

p-10

77

82

264

New

York

1060

919

2009

Brya

nt A

ve H

emps

tead

Ha

Rt 25

ADe

c-10

99

92

265

New

York

1093

850

1974

Sprin

g Stre

et PE

D OV

P 490

IAp

r-10

78

71

266

New

York

2266

590

1994

Nepp

erha

n Ped

BDG

over

Nep

perh

an A

veAp

r-11

75

81

267

North

Car

olina

5140

182P

0000

000

1983

Viad

uct (

Linn C

ove)

Blue

Ridg

e Par

kway

Jun-

097

77

626

8No

rth C

aroli

na13

7001

519

97NC

33 O

ver I

CW -

Croa

tan S

ound

Brid

ge

Sep-

097

78

126

9No

rth C

aroli

na18

7001

520

01NC

32 ov

er A

lbem

arle

Soun

dSe

p-09

77

56

270

North

Car

olina

1290

103

2007

Cape

Fear

Rive

r - I-

140 /

US-

17 B

ypas

sJu

n-08

77

72

271

North

Car

olina

 6800

15 19

97Ho

buck

enSe

p-11

77

71

272

North

Car

olina

 6401

03 20

07W

ilming

ton B

ypas

sJu

n-10

77

62

273

North

Car

olina

9300

1519

90 A

lbem

arle

Soun

dAu

g-11

77

56

274

Oklah

oma

0659

2000

0000

000

1999

US 59

over

Gra

nd La

ke -

Sailb

oat B

ridge

No

v-10

78

70

275

Oklah

oma

2479

1000

0000

000

2000

US 59

over

Gra

nd La

ke -

Sailb

oat B

ridge

Nov-1

07

87

027

6Oh

io20

3127

220

05I-2

80 V

eter

ans G

lass C

ity S

kyw

ay -

Mau

mee

Rive

r Brid

geDe

c-09

99

92

277

Oreg

on16

424 0

70 00

040

1988

COLU

MBI

A RI

VER

I-82

(Hw

y 070

) WB

Mar

-08

76

73

278

Oreg

on19

739 0

01 12

057

2007

S UM

PQUA

R &

COR

P I-5

(Hw

y 001

) SB

Nov-0

68

88

027

9Or

egon

26T0

9 000

0000

019

78SO

UTH

UMPQ

UA R

IVER

Ste

war

t Par

kway

Jun-

095

78

128

0Pe

nnsly

vania

6670

7699

0245

720

2007

Susq

uhan

na B

ridge

Turn

pike (

I-76)

May

-08

88

81

281

Penn

slyva

nia66

7076

9902

4573

020

07Su

squh

anna

Brid

ge Tu

rnpik

e (I-7

6)M

ay-0

88

88

128

2Pe

nnsly

vania

02 70

76 99

00 48

00

Alleg

heny

Rive

r Brid

ge EB

28

3Pe

nnsly

vania

02 70

76 99

00 48

01

Alleg

heny

Rive

r Brid

ge W

B 28

4Pu

erto

Rico

1982

119

92PR

10 ov

er G

agua

nas R

iver

Mar

-07

77

71

285

Rhod

e Isla

nd80

0019

92RI

138 o

ver W

est P

assa

ge N

arra

Bay

Mar

-10

57

53

286

Sout

h Car

olina

1010

5264

2400

1989

Wan

do R

iver B

ridge

Mar

-10

66

61

Page 18: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A7

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

287

Sout

h Car

olina

1010

5262

2500

1989

Wan

do R

iver B

ridge

Mar

-10

66

61

288

Sout

h Car

olina

1040

0030

0010

019

93As

hley R

iver C

harle

ston C

IPNo

v-08

66

61

289

Sout

h Car

olina

1020

0017

0090

020

05Ar

thur

Rav

enel

Jr. B

ridge

Oct-0

88

88

329

0So

uth D

akot

a23

0462

0320

05Fo

ur B

ears

Bridg

eNo

v-09

99

929

1Te

xas

1202

0005

8701

005

2003

GULF

-INTR

ACOA

STAL

WTR

WAY

76

129

2Te

xas

1210

2032

5603

075

1980

HOUS

TON

SHIP

CHAN

NEL

76

129

3Te

xas

1422

7000

1513

471

1998

IH 35

N &

S B

OUND

87

229

4Te

xas

1422

7000

1513

472

1998

IH-3

5 N&S

BOU

ND8

72

295

Texa

s14

2270

0151

0608

019

98OH

LEN

RD &

LOCA

L STR

EETS

87

229

6Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

081

1998

OHLE

N RD

& LO

CAL S

TREE

TS8

72

297

Texa

s14

2270

0151

0609

319

98US

183 N

B EN

T RAM

P8

72

298

Texa

s14

2270

0151

0609

419

98US

183 S

B EX

IT RA

MP

87

229

9Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

102

1998

US 18

3 & IH

35 M

AINL

ANE

87

230

0Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

103

1998

IH35

SB

FTG

RD8

72

301

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1033

719

89HO

USTO

N ST

TO EL

PASO

ST

77

230

2Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

338

1991

EL PA

SO S

T TO

HOUS

TON

ST7

72

303

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1033

919

89GU

ADAL

UPE S

T TO

S LA

REDO

67

230

4Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

340

1993

S LA

REDO

ST T

O GU

ADAL

UPE

67

230

5Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

341

1991

PARK

ING

AREA

77

230

6Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

342

1991

PARK

ING

AREA

76

230

7Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

344

1989

PECO

S ST

SB

77

230

8Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

345

1991

R.O.

W. S

OF D

URAN

GO B

LVD

88

230

9Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

346

1991

R.O.

W. N

OF D

URAN

GO B

LVD

68

231

0Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

347

1989

IH 35

ON-

RP &

GUA

DALU

PE7

72

311

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

819

89R.

O.W

. NEA

R LE

ONA/

FRT.R

D7

82

312

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

919

89R.

O.W

. N O

F S LA

REDO

78

231

3Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

350

1991

R.O.

W. N

OF W

CEV

ALLO

S7

82

314

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1035

119

91R.

O.W

. N O

F ALA

MO

ST7

82

315

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1035

619

89CA

MDE

N - Q

UINC

Y ST

67

231

6Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

357

1993

CAM

DEN

ST TO

N S

T MAR

YS7

72

317

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1035

819

89N

FLOR

ES-N

ST.

MAR

Y’S

ST7

72

318

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1035

919

93SA

N PE

DRO

TO B

ROOK

LYN

AV7

72

319

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

019

93N

ST M

ARY’

S ST

77

232

0Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

361

1993

R.O.

W. W

OF N

ST.

MAR

Y’S

77

232

1Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

362

1989

R.O.

W. N

EAR

ERIE

AVE.

78

232

2Te

xas

1422

70AA

1856

001

1986

Barto

n Cre

ek

77

323

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

319

89R.

O.W

. NEA

R BA

LTIM

ORE A

V7

72

324

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

419

93AT

LANT

A ST

& E

ELM

IRA

ST7

82

325

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

519

93IH

35 S

B OF

F RAM

P7

82

326

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1220

519

93W

MAG

NOLIA

TO N

FRIO

ST

67

232

7Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

206

1989

LOW

ER LE

VEL

67

232

8Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

207

1993

WOO

DLAW

N AV

E7

82

329

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1220

819

93N

TRIN

ITY-IH

10 O

N RA

MP

78

233

0Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

209

1993

R.O.

W. S

OF C

ULEB

RA7

82

331

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1221

019

93W

POPL

AR S

T7

82

332

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1221

119

89R.

O.W

. N O

F CUL

EBRA

78

133

3Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

212

1989

R.O.

W. S

OF C

ULEB

RA7

72

Page 19: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

A8

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

Alp

hab

etic

ally

by

Sta

te20

12 C

ondi

tion

Surv

ey

No.

Stat

eBr

idge

Num

ber

Year

Bu

iltN

ame

Insp

ectio

nD

ate

Dec

k

Con

ditio

nSu

pers

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Subs

truc

ture

C

ondi

tion

Surf

ace

Type

334

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1234

319

91R.

O.W

. S O

F W M

ARTIN

78

233

5Te

xas

1617

8006

1702

026

1973

GULF

-INTR

ACOA

STAL

WTR

WAY

66

233

6Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

479

2003

IH 63

5/US

75 IN

TERC

HANG

E - H

igh F

ive7

71

337

Texa

s18

0570

2374

0148

020

03IH

635/

US 75

INTE

RCHA

NGE -

High

Five

76

133

8Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

474

2005

IH 63

5/US

75 R

AMPN

E - H

igh Fi

ve In

terch

ange

77

339

Texa

s18

0570

2374

0147

720

05IH

635/

US75

RAM

PSW

- High

Five

Inte

rchan

ge7

734

0Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

482

2005

IH63

5 HOV

FLYO

VER-

High

Five

Inte

rchan

ge7

734

1Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

465

2005

HOV

T-RAM

P IH

635 W

B7

734

2Te

xas

1208

5005

0001

373

2006

IH 45

NB

- Galv

esto

n Bay

77

343

Texa

s12

0850

0500

0137

420

07IH

45 S

B - G

alves

ton B

ay7

734

4Te

xas

2012

4003

0603

030

1991

NECH

ES R

IVER

77

234

5Te

xas

2003

6005

0802

179

2009

Trinit

y Rive

r IH

10 W

B7

734

6Te

xas

1315

8006

0401

004

2000

9FM

2031

Inte

rcoas

tal W

ater

way

88

347

Texa

s12

0200

0586

0101

319

98Su

rfside

/ SH

332 I

nter

coas

tal C

anal

77

348

Virg

inia

2139

019

89Be

lvide

re S

t ove

r 2nd

Jam

es R

iver

Jun-

117

66

334

9Vi

rgini

a10

007

1990

Jam

es R

iver -

Rou

te 29

5 (Va

rina-

Enon

Brid

ge)

May

-11

75

60

350

Virg

inia

2729

320

02Po

caho

ntas

Pky E

B ov

er Ja

mes

Rive

rSe

p-10

76

73

351

Virg

inia

2729

420

02Po

caho

ntas

Pky W

B ov

er Ja

mes

Rive

rSe

p-10

77

73

352

Virg

inia

2729

520

02Fa

lling C

reek

Ram

ps -

Ram

p E 0f

I-95

NBL

Sep-

107

66

135

3Vi

rgini

a27

296

2002

Rmp A

150 &

Dup

ont R

amp H

of 89

5 WBL

Aug-

107

77

135

4Vi

rgini

a27

297

2002

Rmp 8

95 &

Ram

ps 0f

150 R

amp G

of 89

5 WBL

Aug-

107

77

135

5Vi

rgini

a25

584

2001

Smar

t Brid

ge R

oute

723 -

Wils

on C

reek

Nov-0

97

77

335

6W

ashin

gton

0010

200A

0000

000

1981

I-90 o

ver D

eny C

reek

Oct-0

86

67

335

7W

ashin

gton

0012

042A

0000

000

1984

182/

16N

over

Colu

mbia

Rive

rM

ay-1

06

67

335

8W

ashin

gton

0012

4042

B000

000

1984

182/

16S

over

Colu

mbia

Rive

rM

ay-1

06

66

335

9W

ashin

gton

0012

819A

0000

000

1988

I-82 o

ver C

olum

bia R

iver @

Ore

gon L

ineM

ar-1

07

67

336

0W

ashin

gton

0012

833A

0000

000

1989

Lake

Was

hingt

on R

ev I-

90Au

g-09

77

73

361

Was

hingt

on00

1283

3B00

0000

019

89La

ke W

ashin

gton

WB

I-90

Aug-

097

77

336

2W

ashin

gton

0014

409B

0000

000

1996

SR 50

9 ove

r Rve

r, RR

& Po

rtlan

d Ave

Sw

ing B

ridge

Jun-

107

77

336

3W

est V

irgini

a00

0000

0002

0A84

220

10I-6

4 EB

Kana

wha

Rive

r Brid

ge40

773

98

93

Page 20: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
Page 21: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

NBI Inspection Data for Concrete Segmental and Cable-Stayed Bridges Listed Chronologically by Year Built

Appendix B

Page 22: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B1

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

11

Texa

s16

1780

0617

0202

619

73GU

LF-IN

TRAC

OAST

AL W

TRW

AY6

62

22

Calif

ornia

57-6

92-R

1974

Pine V

alley

WB

Aug-

087

77

63

3Ca

lifor

nia57

-692

-L19

74Pin

e Vall

ey EB

Aug-

087

87

64

4Ne

w Yo

rk10

9385

019

74Sp

ring S

treet

PED

OVP 4

90I

Apr-1

07

87

15

5Ind

iana

6100

176

1975

High

Brid

ge R

d ove

r Sug

ar C

reek

Jul-0

87

88

66

1Ca

lifor

nia21

-49

1977

Napa

Vall

ey ov

er N

apa R

iver

Jan-

007

87

97

2Co

lorad

oF-1

1-AK

1977

Mille

r Cre

ek EB

I-70

Aug-

087

77

68

3Co

lorad

oF-1

1-AL

1977

Mille

r Cre

ek W

B I-7

0Au

g-08

77

76

94

Color

ado

F-11-

AM19

77Bl

ack G

ore C

reek

I-70

EBJa

n-00

66

66

105

Color

ado

F-11-

AN19

77Bl

ack G

ore C

reek

I-70

WB

Aug-

087

67

611

6Co

lorad

oF-1

1-AU

1977

Co R

d, Go

re C

reek

I-70

EBAu

g-08

76

66

127

Color

ado

F-11-

AV19

77Co

Rd,

Gore

Cre

ek I-

70 W

BAu

g-08

77

76

138

Color

ado

F-11-

AW19

77I-7

0 EB

13.5

mile

s JCT

SH9

1Au

g-08

66

66

149

Color

ado

F-11-

AX19

77I-7

0 WB

9.7 M

iles E

of S

H 24

Aug-

087

77

615

10Ind

iana

4271

519

77I-7

0 WB

Ram

p I-4

65 S

BJu

l-08

55

73

1611

Indian

a17

560

1977

SR 47

over

Turke

y Run

Jun-

075

67

317

12Ind

iana

4995

519

77I-7

0 WB

toI-4

65 S

BSe

p-08

66

73

1813

Mar

yland

2000

00A-

C-01

010

1977

Fredr

ick S

t ove

r US

40 an

d CSX

Dec-0

97

66

119

14Ca

lifor

nia32

c007

619

78Pa

rrots

Ferry

Brid

ge Fo

ur m

iles s

outh

of ro

ute 4

Feb-

106

76

620

15Ca

lifor

nia24

-011

619

78El

Cam

ino A

ve S

acra

men

toDe

c-08

67

76

2116

Indian

a26

790

1978

US 13

8(SR

26) o

ver W

abas

h Rive

r IL

Nov-0

75

56

322

17Or

egon

26T0

9 000

0000

019

78SO

UTH

UMPQ

UA R

IVER

Ste

war

t Par

kway

Jun-

095

78

123

18Ke

ntuc

ky03

7B00

074N

1979

E-W

Con

necto

r -KE

NTUC

KY R

IVER

Sep-

087

78

124

19Illi

nois

1010

1331

0666

1980

I-39 &

I-51

SB

Kish

wau

kee R

iver B

ridge

May

-10

66

76

2520

Mich

igan

7317

3112

000B

031

1980

I-75 N

B At

Zilw

auke

eOc

t-09

67

726

21M

innes

ota

2761

119

80Ply

mou

th A

venu

eNo

v-11

71

85

CIP

2722

Texa

s12

1020

3256

0307

519

80HO

USTO

N SH

IP CH

ANNE

L7

61

281

Florid

a90

0094

1981

US-1

Long

Key

Au

g-09

76

42

292

Illino

is10

1013

4106

8019

81I-3

9 & I-

51 N

B Ki

shw

auke

e Rive

r Brid

geM

ay-1

06

67

630

3M

issou

ri25

7519

81IS

-170

E to

IS-7

0 EOc

t-10

76

60

314

New

York

4070

541

1981

I-390

over

Gen

esse

e Rive

rJu

l-10

77

832

325

New

York

4070

542

1981

I-390

over

Gen

esse

e Rive

rOc

t-10

87

732

336

Was

hingt

on00

1020

0A00

0000

019

81I-9

0 ove

r Den

y Cre

ekOc

t-08

66

73

347

Alab

ama

1283

519

82Da

ulphin

Islan

dNo

v-10

76

61

358

Florid

a90

0098

1982

US-1

Cha

nnel

#5Fe

b-09

77

71

369

Florid

a90

0101

1982

US-1

Mos

er C

hann

elAu

g-09

86

61

3710

Mich

igan

5415

4014

000B

020

1982

US-1

31 N

B 5 m

i Sou

th B

ig Ra

pids

May

-10

77

738

11Flo

rida

9001

1719

83US

-1 N

iles C

hann

elM

ay-0

97

67

139

12Ind

iana

3302

519

83Ra

mp B

over

Con

rail

Jun-

084

16

340

13Ind

iana

3302

619

83Ra

mp -

D EB

over

Rile

y Roa

dJu

n-08

41

73

4114

Indian

a33

027

1983

Ram

p C EB

over

Rile

y Roa

dJu

n-08

41

73

4215

Indian

a33

028

1983

Ram

p A W

B Ju

n-08

42

63

4316

Indian

a33

029

1983

SR 12

over

cana

lJu

n-08

41

43

4417

Main

e22

6219

83W

iscas

set B

ridge

- Sh

eeps

cot R

iver -

US

Rout

e 1No

v-10

77

73

4518

Mich

igan

5415

4014

000B

010

1983

US-1

31 S

B 5 m

i Sou

th B

ig Ra

pids

May

-10

76

746

19Ne

bras

kaS0

02 50

816

1983

N2 ov

er th

e Miss

ouri

Rive

rOc

t-08

77

74

4720

North

Car

olina

5140

182P

0000

000

1983

Viad

uct (

Linn C

ove)

Blue

Ridg

e Par

kway

Jun-

097

77

6

Page 23: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B2

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

4821

Florid

a87

0602

1984

SR 82

1 Ram

p to I

-75 N

BSe

p-08

77

70

4922

Indian

a49

0023

619

84W

est S

t ove

r IW

C Ca

nal

Sep-

086

67

150

23M

ichiga

n73

1731

1200

0B03

219

84I-7

5 SB

at Zi

lwau

kee

Oct-0

96

77

5124

Mich

igan

7317

3112

000B

038

1984

I-75 S

B RA

MP a

t Zilw

auke

eOc

t-09

77

752

25M

ichiga

n82

1820

2200

0S43

619

84M

-39 S

B RA

MP K

in A

llen P

ark

Aug-

107

76

5326

Was

hingt

on00

1204

2A00

0000

019

8418

2/16

N ov

er C

olum

bia R

iver

May

-10

66

73

5427

Was

hingt

on00

1240

42B0

0000

019

8418

2/16

S ov

er C

olum

bia R

iver

May

-10

66

63

5528

Miss

ouri

3493

1985

US 24

W M

ISSI

SSIPP

I RVR

Aug-

106

66

0Ca

ble S

taye

d56

1Co

lorad

oF-0

7-AK

1986

I-70 W

BND

Apr-0

87

78

657

2Co

lorad

oF-0

7-AL

1986

I-70 W

BND

Apr-0

87

77

658

3Co

lorad

oF-0

7-AN

1986

I-70 W

BND

Apr-0

88

77

659

4Co

lorad

oF-0

8-AA

1986

I-70 A

cces

s Rd G

rizzly

Cre

ekAp

r-08

88

86

605

Color

ado

F-08-

AB19

86I-7

0 Griz

zly C

reek

May

-08

77

76

616

Florid

a87

0643

1986

Ram

p to I

-75 N

BOc

t-08

77

70

627

Florid

a87

0644

1986

I-75 N

B to

SR

821

Oct-0

87

77

063

8Flo

rida

8706

4519

86SR

821 R

amp t

o I-7

5 SB

Oct-0

87

77

064

9Flo

rida

8706

4619

86I-7

5 SB

Oct-0

87

77

065

10Flo

rida

8706

4719

86I-7

5 NB

Oct-0

87

78

066

11Flo

rida

8603

8619

86SR

84 EB

I-59

5/ I-

75 In

terch

ange

Jan-

107

78

067

12Flo

rida

8603

8719

86I-5

95W

B to

I-75

SB In

terch

ange

Jan-

107

67

068

13Flo

rida

8603

8819

86I-7

5 NB

to I-

595E

B Int

erch

ange

Aug-

096

68

069

14Flo

rida

8603

8919

86I-7

5 Ind

ian Tr

ace (

SW14

)Oc

t-09

77

80

7015

Florid

a86

0385

1986

I-75S

B to

I-59

5EB

Inter

chan

geJa

n-10

77

70

7116

Indian

a49

0021

719

86Ind

iana/

Mich

igan o

ver I

WC

Cana

lSe

p-08

77

71

7217

Iowa

2530

119

86IA

2 ov

er M

issou

ri Ri

ver

Oct-0

87

78

473

18Ke

ntuc

ky00

7B00

137N

1986

Skyla

nd D

r. ove

r US

25E 

May

-08

77

64

7419

Texa

s14

2270

AA18

5600

119

86Ba

rton C

reek

7

775

20Flo

rida

8604

3419

87SB

US-

1 to S

t Lau

derd

ale A

irpor

tM

ar-0

87

77

076

21Ke

ntuc

ky09

8B00

184N

1987

Ram

p B ov

er U

S 23

Feb-

097

78

477

22M

ississ

ippi

3100

6130

3000

450

1987

SR 61

3 Esc

ataw

pa R

ierAu

g-08

76

69

7823

Florid

a86

0510

1988

I-595

WB

to 86

9 NB

Inter

chan

geAu

g-09

77

80

7924

Florid

a86

0515

1988

869 S

B to

I-75

SB

Inter

chan

geAu

g-09

76

80

8025

Florid

a86

0516

1988

869 t

o I-7

5 SB

Inter

chan

geFe

b-08

76

70

8126

Florid

a86

0517

1988

869 S

B to

I-75

SB

595 I

nter

chan

geAu

g-09

77

70

8227

Florid

a86

0518

1988

869 S

b to I

-75 S

B 59

5 Int

erch

ange

Jan-

107

67

083

28Flo

rida

8605

1919

88I-7

5 NB

to 86

9 NB

Inter

chan

geAu

g-09

77

80

8429

Florid

a86

0476

1988

US 44

1 NB

to I-

595 W

B Int

erch

ange

Dec-0

97

57

085

30Flo

rida

8604

7719

88I-5

95 EB

to S

R7 N

B 59

5 Int

erch

ange

Dec-0

97

77

086

31Illi

nois

7501

2222

690

1988

I-72 E

B ov

er Ill

inois

Rive

rAp

r-10

76

79

8732

Illino

is75

0123

2371

519

88I-7

2 WB

over

Illino

is Ri

ver

Apr-1

06

67

988

33M

ississ

ippi

1100

1100

2400

010

1988

I-110

over

RR

and K

eega

n Bat

ouDe

c-09

77

71

8934

Miss

issipp

i17

0011

0024

0000

A19

88I-1

10 In

ner L

oop o

ver U

S 90

Dec-0

97

77

190

35M

ississ

ippi

1700

1100

2400

00B

1988

I-110

Out

er Lo

op ov

er U

S 90

Dec-0

97

77

191

36M

ississ

ippi

1700

1100

2400

08A

1988

I-110

Off

Ram

p ove

r Divi

sion S

t De

c-09

77

81

9237

Miss

issipp

i17

0011

0024

0008

B19

88I-1

10 O

n Ram

p ove

r Divi

sion S

TDe

c-09

77

81

9338

Oreg

on16

424 0

70 00

040

1988

COLU

MBI

A RI

VER

I-82

(Hw

y 070

) WB

Mar

-08

76

73

9439

Was

hingt

on00

1281

9A00

0000

019

88I-8

2 ove

r Colu

mbia

Rive

r @ O

rego

n Line

Mar

-10

76

73

Page 24: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B3

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

9540

Color

ado

F-08-

AV19

89I-7

0 WBN

DAp

r-08

87

76

9641

Color

ado

F-08-

BH19

89Fre

nch C

reek

Apr-0

87

77

697

42Flo

rida

8605

0919

89SB

869 t

o NB

I-75 I

nter

chan

geAu

g-09

77

70

9843

Florid

a86

0511

1989

SB 86

9 to E

B I-5

95 In

terch

ange

Feb-

087

68

099

44Flo

rida

7205

1819

89Na

poleo

n Bro

war

d Brid

ge (D

ames

Point

)Oc

t-09

76

76

100

45Flo

rida

8605

1219

89I-7

5 Sb t

o 896

NB

Inter

chan

geFe

b-08

76

80

101

46So

uth C

aroli

na10

1052

6424

0019

89W

ando

Rive

r Brid

geM

ar-1

06

66

110

247

Sout

h Car

olina

1010

5262

2500

1989

Wan

do R

iver B

ridge

Mar

-10

66

61

103

48Vi

rgini

a21

390

1989

Belvi

dere

St o

ver 2

nd Ja

mes

Rive

rJu

n-11

76

63

104

49W

ashin

gton

0012

833A

0000

000

1989

Lake

Was

hingt

on R

ev I-

90Au

g-09

77

73

105

50W

ashin

gton

0012

833B

0000

000

1989

Lake

Was

hingt

on W

B I-9

0Au

g-09

77

73

106

51Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

337

1989

HOUS

TON

ST TO

EL PA

SO S

T7

72

107

52Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

339

1989

GUAD

ALUP

E ST T

O S

LARE

DO6

72

108

53Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

344

1989

PECO

S ST

SB

77

210

954

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

719

89IH

35 O

N-RP

& G

UADA

LUPE

77

211

055

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

819

89R.

O.W

. NEA

R LE

ONA/

FRT.R

D7

82

111

56Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

349

1989

R.O.

W. N

OF S

LARE

DO7

82

112

57Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

356

1989

CAM

DEN

- QUI

NCY

ST6

72

113

58Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

358

1989

N FL

ORES

-N S

T. M

ARY’

S ST

77

211

459

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

219

89R.

O.W

. NEA

R ER

IE AV

E.7

82

115

60Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

363

1989

R.O.

W. N

EAR

BALT

IMOR

E AV

77

211

661

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1220

619

89LO

WER

LEVE

L6

72

117

62Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

211

1989

R.O.

W. N

OF C

ULEB

RA7

81

118

63Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

212

1989

R.O.

W. S

OF C

ULEB

RA7

72

119

64No

rth C

aroli

na93

0015

1990

 Albe

mar

le So

und

Aug-

117

75

612

065

Virg

inia

1000

719

90Ja

mes

Rive

r - R

oute

295 (

Varin

a-En

on B

ridge

)M

ay-1

17

56

012

11

Alab

ama

1543

019

91Co

chra

ne -

Afric

anto

wn

Jan-

116

66

212

22

Color

ado

F-08-

AR19

91I-7

0 Colo

rado

Rive

r / U

P RR

May

-08

77

76

123

3Flo

rida

7205

7019

91Ac

osta

Brid

ge S

BAu

g-08

77

70

124

4Flo

rida

7205

7119

91Ac

osta

Brid

ge N

BJa

n-10

76

70

125

5Flo

rida

8750

0019

91Po

rt Bl

vd IC

WFe

b-10

77

79

126

6Flo

rida

8750

0119

91Po

rt Bl

vd IC

WFe

b-10

77

71

127

7Ge

orgia

051-

0169

-019

91Sa

vann

ah -

Talm

adge

Mem

orial

Brid

ge S

R 40

4 Spu

r (US

17)

Jan-

117

77

0Ca

ble S

taye

d BC

128

8Ida

ho00

0000

0000

1689

619

91Be

nnet

t Bay

Brid

ge C

ouer

Dale

ne’

May

-09

66

63

129

9Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

338

1991

EL PA

SO S

T TO

HOUS

TON

ST7

72

130

10Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

341

1991

PARK

ING

AREA

77

213

111

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

219

91PA

RKIN

G AR

EA7

62

132

12Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

345

1991

R.O.

W. S

OF D

URAN

GO B

LVD

88

213

313

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

619

91R.

O.W

. N O

F DUR

ANGO

BLV

D6

82

134

14Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

350

1991

R.O.

W. N

OF W

CEV

ALLO

S7

82

135

15Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

351

1991

R.O.

W. N

OF A

LAM

O ST

78

213

616

Texa

s15

0150

0072

1234

319

91R.

O.W

. S O

F W M

ARTIN

78

213

717

Texa

s20

1240

0306

0303

019

91NE

CHES

RIV

ER7

72

138

18Ca

lifor

nia57

1054

1992

Rout

e 78 S

an Y

sable

Cre

ekM

ay-0

96

87

413

919

Indian

a66

8319

92SR

26 EB

over

Wab

ash R

iver, C

SXDe

c-06

67

73

140

20Ind

iana

6685

1992

SR 26

WB

over

Wab

ash R

iver, C

SXDe

c-06

67

73

141

21Ne

vada

03

05-B

1868

1992

Hoov

er D

am B

ypas

sOc

t-09

57

76

Page 25: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B4

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

142

22Pu

erto

Rico

1982

119

92PR

10 ov

er G

agua

nas R

iver

Mar

-07

77

71

143

23Rh

ode I

sland

8000

1992

RI 13

8 ove

r Wes

t Pas

sage

Nar

ra B

ayM

ar-1

05

75

314

424

Color

ado

F-08-

BJ19

93I-7

0 Han

ging L

ake

Apr-0

87

78

614

525

Conn

ectic

ut06

200A

1993

Ferry

Roa

d Con

n. Ri

ver N

B I-9

5Ju

l-08

65

66

146

26Co

nnec

ticut

0620

0B19

93Fe

rry R

oad C

onn.

Rive

r SB

I-95

Jul-0

86

46

614

727

Florid

a57

0091

1993

SR 29

3 Cho

ctaw

atch

ee B

ayOc

t-08

77

70

148

28So

uth C

aroli

na10

4000

3000

100

1993

Ashle

y Rive

r Cha

rlesto

n CIP

Nov-0

86

66

114

929

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1034

019

93S

LARE

DO S

T TO

GUAD

ALUP

E6

72

150

30Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

357

1993

CAM

DEN

ST TO

N S

T MAR

YS7

72

151

31Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

359

1993

SAN

PEDR

O TO

BRO

OKLY

N AV

77

215

232

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

019

93N

ST M

ARY’

S ST

77

215

333

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

119

93R.

O.W

. W O

F N S

T. M

ARY’

S7

72

154

34Te

xas

1501

5000

1710

364

1993

ATLA

NTA

ST &

E EL

MIR

A ST

78

215

535

Texa

s15

0150

0017

1036

519

93IH

35 S

B OF

F RAM

P7

82

156

36Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

205

1993

W M

AGNO

LIA TO

N FR

IO S

T6

72

157

37Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

207

1993

WOO

DLAW

N AV

E7

82

158

38Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

208

1993

N TR

INITY

-IH 10

ON

RAM

P7

82

159

39Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

209

1993

R.O.

W. S

OF C

ULEB

RA7

82

160

40Te

xas

1501

5000

7212

210

1993

W PO

PLAR

ST

78

216

141

Calif

ornia

55C0

623

1994

BNSF

Am

trak M

etro

Link

/ El

Paso

Rd

Jun-

087

87

016

242

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0066

019

94W

INDW

ARD

VIAD

T IB

Feb-

097

77

216

343

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0066

119

94W

INDW

ARD

VIAD

T OB

Feb-

097

77

216

444

Miss

ouri

3497

1994

US 67

S -

RRJu

n-10

67

50

Cable

Sta

yed

165

45Ne

w Yo

rk22

6659

019

94Ne

pper

han P

ed B

DG ov

er N

eppe

rhan

Ave

Apr-1

17

58

116

646

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0042

319

95HA

LAW

A VA

L VIA

D IB

Feb-

097

77

216

747

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0042

419

95HA

LAW

A VA

LL V

IA O

BFe

b-09

77

72

168

1Ca

lifor

nia57

c067

619

96M

onte

zum

a Roa

d San

Dieg

oM

ar-1

07

77

016

92

Haw

aii00

3000

H302

0084

119

96H3

-KAN

EOHE

IC IB

No

v-09

77

72

170

3Ha

waii

0030

00H3

0200

842

1996

H3-K

ANEO

HE IC

OB

No

v-09

77

82

171

4Ha

waii

0030

00H3

0200

843

1996

KANE

OHE I

C RA

MP B

No

v-09

77

72

172

5W

ashin

gton

0014

409B

0000

000

1996

SR 50

9 ove

r Rve

r, RR

& Po

rtlan

d Ave

Sw

ing B

ridge

Jun-

107

77

3Sw

ing B

ridge

173

6Flo

rida

8901

5119

97US

-1 /

SR-7

07 S

B ov

er S

t Luc

ie Ri

ver -

Roo

seve

lt Br

idge

Jun-

087

87

017

47

Florid

a89

0152

1997

US-1

/ SR

-707

NB

over

St L

ucie

Rive

r - R

oose

velt

Bridg

eJu

n-08

78

70

175

8Flo

rida

7901

7419

97SR

439 S

eabr

eeze

WB

over

IWC

Oct-0

87

77

017

69

Florid

a79

0175

1997

SR 43

9 Sea

bree

ze W

B ov

er IW

COc

t-08

67

70

177

10M

issou

ri40

8919

97M

O 34

E - A

QUM

ar-1

07

87

0Ca

ble S

taye

d17

811

North

Car

olina

1370

015

1997

NC 33

Ove

r ICW

- Cr

oata

n Sou

nd B

ridge

Se

p-09

77

81

179

12No

rth C

aroli

na 68

0015

 1997

Hobu

cken

Sep-

117

77

118

013

Arizo

na22

9519

98SR

87 -

Low

er S

cew

tail B

ridge

No

v-09

67

70

Balan

ced C

antil

ever

181

14Flo

rida

8606

2219

9817

th S

treet

Cau

sway

Au

g-10

88

80

182

15Flo

rida

8606

2319

9817

th S

treet

Cau

sway

Au

g-10

88

80

183

16M

innes

ota

6255

5A19

98W

abas

ha S

treet

NB

Aug-

117

88

4CI

P18

417

Minn

esot

a62

555B

1998

Wab

asha

Stre

et S

BSe

p-11

78

84

CIP

185

18Te

xas

1202

0005

8601

013

1998

Surfs

ide/ S

H 33

2 Int

erco

asta

l Can

al7

718

619

Texa

s14

2270

0015

1347

119

98IH

35 N

& S

BOU

ND8

72

187

20Te

xas

1422

7000

1513

472

1998

IH-3

5 N&S

BOU

ND8

72

188

21Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

080

1998

OHLE

N RD

& LO

CAL S

TREE

TS8

72

Page 26: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B5

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

189

22Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

081

1998

OHLE

N RD

& LO

CAL S

TREE

TS8

72

190

23Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

093

1998

US 18

3 NB

ENT R

AMP

87

219

124

Texa

s14

2270

0151

0609

419

98US

183 S

B EX

IT RA

MP

87

219

225

Texa

s14

2270

0151

0610

219

98US

183 &

IH 35

MAI

NLAN

E8

72

193

26Te

xas

1422

7001

5106

103

1998

IH35

SB

FTG

RD8

72

194

27Flo

rida

5801

7419

99SR

281 -

Gar

con P

oint -

San

ta R

osa B

ay B

ridge

Apr-0

97

77

019

528

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6606

8YUD

OTNB

I19

99I 9

3 RAM

P NS

M

ay-1

07

76

319

629

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6607

8YPD

OTNB

I19

99I 9

3 RAM

P SN

Ju

n-09

87

73

197

30M

issou

ri12

132

1999

Crev

e Coe

ur La

ke B

ridge

ASB

I 200

0 Ern

est P

etzo

idAu

g-10

77

70

198

31Ne

vada

I 214

119

99Ra

mp I

-15 S

to 95

E Sp

aghe

tti In

terch

nage

Feb-

097

77

119

932

Neva

daI 9

3919

99Ra

mp U

S 95

SW

to I-

15 S

Spa

ghet

ti Int

erch

ange

Jan-

097

77

120

033

Neva

daI 9

4019

99I01

5 Ram

p NW

Spa

ghet

ti Int

erch

ange

Jan-

097

77

120

134

Neva

daI 9

04R

1999

Ram

p N M

LK B

lvd S

pagh

etti

Inter

chan

geJa

n-09

77

71

202

35Ok

lahom

a06

5920

0000

0000

019

99US

59 ov

er G

rand

Lake

- Sa

ilboa

t Brid

ge

Nov-1

07

87

020

336

Indian

a33

163

2000

SR 91

2 EB

to I-

80 EB

Jun-

096

77

120

437

Indian

a33

166

2000

SR 01

2 WB

to I-

80 W

BJu

n-09

67

71

205

38M

assa

chus

etts

B166

569A

JDOT

NBI

2000

I 93 S

B

Feb-

117

77

320

639

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6656

9N3D

OTNB

I20

00I 9

3 SB

Ap

r-09

77

73

207

40M

assa

chus

etts

B166

569Q

6DOT

NBI

2000

I 93 S

B

Jun-

097

77

320

841

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6656

9Q7D

OTNB

I20

00I 9

3 SB

Ap

r-09

77

73

209

42Ok

lahom

a24

7910

0000

0000

020

00US

59 ov

er G

rand

Lake

- Sa

ilboa

t Brid

geNo

v-10

78

70

210

1Flo

rida

8901

5820

01SR

A1A

EB ov

er S

t Luc

ie Ri

ver -

Evan

s Cra

ry Br

idge

Jun-

098

78

021

12

Florid

a89

0160

2001

SR A

1A EB

over

St L

ucie

Rive

r - Ev

ans C

rary

Bridg

eJu

n-09

87

80

212

3Flo

rida

7901

8720

01US

92 B

road

way

Brid

ge ov

er IW

C W

BM

ar-0

97

77

921

34

Florid

a79

0188

2001

US 92

Bro

adw

ay B

ridge

over

IWC

EBM

ar-0

97

77

921

45

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6610

8Y6D

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP C

T

Mar

-10

66

73

215

6M

assa

chus

etts

B166

108Y

CDOT

NBI

2001

US 1

RAM

P CT

Ju

n-09

87

83

216

7M

assa

chus

etts

B166

108Y

DDOT

NBI

2001

US 1

RAM

P CT

Ju

n-09

77

73

217

8M

assa

chus

etts

B166

108Y

FDOT

NBI

2001

US 1

RAM

P CT

M

ar-1

07

67

321

89

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6611

8XYD

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP S

T

Jun-

098

77

321

910

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6611

8Y3D

OTNB

I20

01US

1 R

AMP S

T

May

-10

77

73

220

11M

assa

chus

etts

B166

598M

DDOT

NBI

2001

I 93 R

AMP X

X

Jan-

107

66

322

112

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6671

8TLD

OTNB

I20

01I 9

3 RAM

P MW

Apr-0

97

77

322

213

Miss

issipp

i55

7048

3P00

0000

020

01Na

tches

Trac

e Par

kway

- FH

WA

Dec-0

87

77

122

314

New

York

1075

569

2001

MR

14C

over

RTE

I-27

8 & M

arcy

Ave

Sep-

107

78

222

415

North

Car

olina

1870

015

2001

NC 32

over

Albe

mar

le So

und

Sep-

097

75

622

516

Virg

inia

2558

420

01Sm

art B

ridge

Rou

te 72

3 - W

ilson

Cre

ekNo

v-09

77

73

226

17Flo

rida

8605

2020

02SB

SR

A1A

& EB

SR

858

Ap

r-09

88

80

227

18Flo

rida

8606

3020

02I-5

95 &

US

1 to F

t Lau

derd

ale A

irpor

tNo

v-09

78

80

228

19Flo

rida

8606

3120

02En

tranc

e to F

t Lau

derd

ale A

irpor

tNo

v-09

79

90

229

20Flo

rida

8606

3220

02Ft

Laud

erda

le Ai

rpor

t to I

-595

& U

S 1

Nov-0

98

88

023

021

Florid

a86

0633

2002

Ft La

uder

dale

Airp

ort R

e-En

try R

amp

Nov-0

98

88

023

122

Florid

a86

0634

2002

Ft La

uder

dale

Airp

ort R

e-En

try R

amp

Nov-0

98

89

023

223

Florid

a86

0635

2002

Ft La

uder

dale

Airp

ort R

e-En

try R

amp

Nov-0

99

89

023

324

Geor

gia12

7-50

20-0

2002

Brun

swick

- Si

dney

Lanie

r SR

25 (U

S 17

)M

ar-1

17

78

0Ca

ble S

taye

d BC

234

25M

assa

chus

etts

B163

9282

FDOT

NBI

2002

US 1

RAM

P TC

M

ar-1

06

67

323

526

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6392

8DGD

OTNB

I20

02US

1 R

AMP T

C

Jul-0

97

76

3

Page 27: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B6

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

236

27M

assa

chus

etts

B163

928Q

GDOT

NBI

2002

US 1

RAM

P TC

Ju

l-09

87

83

237

28M

assa

chus

etts

B163

928X

UDOT

NBI

2002

US 1

RAM

P TC

Ju

l-09

77

83

238

29M

assa

chus

etts

B163

928X

WDO

TNBI

2002

US 1

RAM

P TC

M

ar-1

06

66

323

930

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6600

901D

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 NB

Fe

b-10

77

73

240

31M

assa

chus

etts

B166

009P

MDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP S

A - C

NDe

c-09

77

73

241

32M

assa

chus

etts

B166

018Y

WDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 S

B

Jan-

107

76

324

233

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6601

8YXD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 SB

M

ar-1

07

67

324

334

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6659

82ND

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 RAM

P XX

Ja

n-10

65

53

244

35M

assa

chus

etts

B166

618Q

XDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 N

B

Jun-

097

77

324

536

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6661

8QYD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 NB

Ap

r-09

76

73

246

37M

assa

chus

etts

B166

618R

0DOT

NBI

2002

I 93 N

B

Mar

-10

66

63

247

38M

assa

chus

etts

B166

628T

MDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP K

Jan-

107

67

324

839

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

8TPD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ap

r-09

77

73

249

40M

assa

chus

etts

B166

628T

TDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP K

Apr-0

97

78

325

041

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6668

8MCD

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 RAM

P XXE

De

c-09

77

73

251

42M

assa

chus

etts

B166

6982

HDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 H

OV R

AMP E

B Ju

n-10

65

73

252

43M

assa

chus

etts

B166

6982

JDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 H

OV R

AMP E

B Ja

n-10

77

73

253

44M

assa

chus

etts

B166

708T

WDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP K

K

Mar

-10

66

73

254

45M

assa

chus

etts

B166

719P

WDO

TNBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP M

W

Ju

n-09

77

73

255

46M

assa

chus

etts

B166

8182

PDOT

NBI

2002

COM

B I9

0 RPS

&HOV

&AM

TK H

WY

FRO

NTAG

E RD

Jun-

097

77

325

647

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6681

8QVD

OTNB

I20

02HW

Y F

RONT

AGE R

D M

ar-1

17

67

325

748

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6682

8M5D

OTNB

I20

02I 9

3 RAM

P LL

De

c-10

65

73

258

49M

assa

chus

etts

C010

498Y

HDOT

NBI

2002

I 93 R

AMP T

S

Apr-1

07

76

325

950

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

420

02I-2

5 NB

to I-

40 W

B Bi

g I In

terch

ange

Nov-0

97

77

126

051

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

520

02I-2

5 SB

to I-

40 W

B Bi

g I In

terch

ange

Nov-0

97

67

126

152

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

720

02I-4

0 WB

to I-

25 S

B Bi

g I In

terch

nage

Oct-0

97

77

126

253

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0995

820

02I-2

5 SB

to I-

40 EB

Big

I Inte

rchan

geOc

t-09

77

75

263

54Ne

w M

exico

0000

0000

0009

959

2002

I-25 N

B to

I-40

EB B

ig I In

terch

ange

Nov-0

97

77

126

455

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0996

020

02I-4

0 EB

Ram

p to I

-25 S

B Bi

g I In

terch

nage

Nov-0

97

77

126

556

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0996

120

02I-4

0 EB

Ram

p to I

-25 N

B Bi

g I In

terch

nage

Nov-0

97

77

126

657

New

Mex

ico00

0000

0000

0996

220

02I-4

0 Wb R

amp t

o I-2

5 NB

Big I

Inte

rchna

geNo

v-09

77

71

267

58Vi

rgini

a27

293

2002

Poca

hont

as Pk

y EB

over

Jam

es R

iver

Sep-

107

67

326

859

Virg

inia

2729

420

02Po

caho

ntas

Pky W

B ov

er Ja

mes

Rive

rSe

p-10

77

73

269

60Vi

rgini

a27

295

2002

Fallin

g Cre

ek R

amps

- Ra

mp E

0f I-

95 N

BLSe

p-10

76

61

270

61Vi

rgini

a27

296

2002

Rmp A

150 &

Dup

ont R

amp H

of 89

5 WBL

Aug-

107

77

127

162

Virg

inia

2729

720

02Rm

p 895

& R

amps

0f 15

0 Ram

p G of

895 W

BLAu

g-10

77

71

272

63Flo

rida

9304

7720

03I-9

5 SB

to S

R-80

PB In

terch

ange

Dec-0

97

88

027

364

Florid

a93

0478

2003

SR-8

0 Ram

p NB

I-95 P

B Int

erch

ange

Dec-0

98

88

027

465

Florid

a46

0113

2003

Hath

away

US

98Oc

t-09

77

70

275

66Flo

rida

1701

7620

03RI

NGLIN

G CA

USEW

AY S

R 78

9 ove

r ICW

Jan-

107

78

027

667

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6600

900D

OTNB

I20

03I 9

3 NB

Ja

n-10

77

73

277

68M

assa

chus

etts

B166

659A

YDOT

NBI

2003

I 93 R

AMP A

S

Feb-

107

77

327

869

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6670

9URD

OTNB

I20

03I 9

3 RAM

P KK

Ju

n-09

77

73

279

70M

assa

chus

etts

B166

769Q

LDOT

NBI

2003

I 93 R

AMP C

C

Jul-1

07

77

328

071

Texa

s12

0200

0587

0100

520

03GU

LF-IN

TRAC

OAST

AL W

TRW

AY7

61

281

72Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

479

2003

IH 63

5/US

75 IN

TERC

HANG

E - H

igh F

ive7

71

282

73Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

480

2003

IH 63

5/US

75 IN

TERC

HANG

E - H

igh F

ive7

61

Page 28: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B7

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

283

74Flo

rida

9304

7920

04I-9

5 SB

to PB

IA PB

Inte

rchna

geDe

c-09

77

70

284

75Flo

rida

9304

8020

04PB

IA to

I-95

SB

Dec-0

97

78

028

576

Florid

a93

0481

2004

I-95 S

B to

PBIA

PB In

terch

nage

Dec-0

97

88

028

677

Florid

a93

0482

2004

I-95 N

B to

PBIA

PB In

terch

nage

Dec-0

98

89

028

778

Florid

a93

0483

2004

PBIA

Ram

p to I

-95 N

BDe

c-09

77

80

288

79Flo

rida

9304

8420

04PB

IA R

amp t

o I-9

5 SB

Dec-0

98

88

028

980

Florid

a46

0112

2004

Hath

away

US

98Oc

t-09

77

70

290

81Flo

rida

7206

3920

04I-9

5 SB

to 9A

Jax S

outh

Inte

rchan

ge R

amp J

-2Ap

r-08

77

80

291

82Flo

rida

9305

0620

04Ro

yal P

ark B

ridge

Nov-1

08

87

029

283

Flroid

a93

0507

2004

Roya

l Par

k Brid

geNo

v-10

88

70

293

84M

assa

chus

etts

B166

039P

FDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP S

A-CN

M

ar-1

06

77

329

485

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6658

9B0D

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P X

Ja

n-10

66

73

295

86M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589Q

WDO

TNBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Dec-0

97

77

329

687

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6658

9QXD

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P X

De

c-09

77

73

297

88M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589Q

YDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Dec-0

97

77

329

889

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6658

9RM

DOTN

BI20

04I 9

3 RAM

P X

Ja

n-10

77

73

299

90M

assa

chus

etts

B166

589R

NDOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP X

Jan-

107

77

330

091

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6662

9UTD

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P K

Ju

n-10

77

73

301

92M

assa

chus

etts

B166

629V

0DOT

NBI

2004

I 93 R

AMP K

Jun-

107

67

330

293

Mas

sach

uset

tsB1

6666

9QRD

OTNB

I20

04I 9

3 RAM

P FX

M

ar-1

07

77

330

394

Color

ado

H-09

-U20

05M

AROO

N CR

EEK

Asp

en

May

-09

88

86

304

95Flo

rida

8709

7220

05SR

-25 o

ver O

keec

hobe

e Rd

Nov-1

08

88

630

596

Florid

a72

0640

2005

I-95 N

B to

I-29

5 NB

Jax S

outh

Inte

rchan

ge R

amp I

-2Ap

r-08

77

80

306

97Flo

rida

7206

4120

05I-2

95 S

B to

I-95

NB

Jax S

outh

Inte

rchna

ge R

amp H

-1Ja

n-10

77

80

307

98Flo

rida

1502

4420

05CL

EARW

ATER

MEM

ORIA

L CSW

Y. SR

60Ja

n-10

77

70

308

99Flo

rida

1008

1220

05CR

OSST

OWN

(SR-

618)

Lero

y Selm

an Ex

psw

yAu

g-08

88

80

309

100

Indian

a41

966

2005

I-70 W

BL O

N RA

MP

Aug-

088

88

331

010

1Ind

iana

4196

820

05I-7

0 EBL

OFF

RAM

P Au

g-08

88

83

311

102

Indian

a41

972

2005

I-70 E

BL O

N RA

MP

Aug-

088

88

331

210

3M

assa

chus

etts

B166

038D

EDOT

NBI

2005

I 93 R

AMP S

ACN

M

ar-1

06

77

331

310

4M

assa

chus

etts

B166

038D

FDOT

NBI

2005

I 93 R

AMP S

ACN

M

ar-1

06

77

331

410

5M

assa

chus

etts

B166

599Q

5DOT

NBI

2005

COM

B I9

0&I93

RMP L

L&AM

TK I

93 R

AMP X

X M

ar-1

17

78

931

510

6M

assa

chus

etts

B166

629Q

4DOT

NBI

2005

COM

B I9

0&I93

RMP L

L&AM

TK I

93 R

AMP K

M

ar-1

17

77

931

610

7Ne

w Je

rsy12

2315

020

05Vi

ctory

Brdg

e - R

arita

n Rive

r NJ-

35Se

p-09

77

71

317

108

Ohio

2031

272

2005

I-280

Vet

eran

s Glas

s City

Sky

way

- M

aum

ee R

iver B

ridge

Dec-0

99

99

231

810

9So

uth C

aroli

na10

2000

1700

900

2005

Arth

ur R

aven

el Jr.

Brid

geOc

t-08

88

83

Cable

Sta

yed

319

110

Sout

h Dak

ota

2304

6203

2005

Four

Bea

rs Br

idge

Nov-0

99

99

320

111

Texa

s18

0570

2374

0147

420

05IH

635/

US75

RAM

PNE -

High

Five

Inte

rchan

ge7

732

111

2Te

xas

1805

7023

7401

477

2005

IH 63

5/US

75 R

AMPS

W- H

igh Fi

ve In

terch

ange

77

322

113

Texa

s18

0570

2374

0148

220

05IH

635 H

OV FL

YOVE

R- H

igh Fi

ve In

terch

ange

77

323

114

Texa

s18

0570

2374

0146

520

05HO

V T-R

AMP I

H 63

5 WB

77

324

1Flo

rida

1008

0020

06SR

-618

(CRO

SSTO

WN)

Lero

y Selm

an Ex

psw

yAu

g-08

77

80

325

2Flo

rida

1008

0620

06SR

618 (

CROS

STOW

N) Le

roy S

elman

Exps

wy

Aug-

087

78

032

63

Florid

a89

0150

2006

Erne

st Ly

ons B

ridge

Ju

n-09

99

90

327

4M

assa

chus

etts

B166

629Q

3DOT

NBI

2006

I 93 R

AMP K

Jun-

106

67

332

85

Minn

esot

a82

856

2006

I-494

WB

Oct-1

18

88

4CI

P32

96

Texa

s12

0850

0500

0137

320

06IH

45 N

B - G

alves

ton B

ay7

7

Page 29: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

B8

Code

De

scrip

tion

Code

De

scrip

tion

1 M

onoli

thic

Conc

rete

(Con

curre

ntly

Place

d with

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k)

5 Ep

oxy O

verla

y2

Integ

ral C

oncre

te (S

epar

ate N

on-M

odifie

d Lay

er of

Con

crete

Add

ed to

Stru

ctura

l Dec

k) 6

Bitu

mino

us3

Late

x Con

crete

or S

imila

r Add

itive

9

Othe

r4

Low

Slum

p Con

crete

0

None

(No A

dditi

onal

Conc

rete

Thick

ness

or W

earin

g Sur

face

is In

clude

d in t

he B

ridge

Dec

k)

201

2 D

ura

bili

ty S

urv

ey o

f C

oncr

ete

Seg

men

tal B

ridges

by

Year

Built

2012

Con

ditio

n Su

rvey

No.

No

Tim

eSt

ate

Brid

ge N

umbe

r Ye

ar

Built

Nam

eIn

spec

tion

Dat

eD

eck

C

ondi

tion

Supe

rstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

bstr

uctu

re

Con

ditio

nSu

rfac

e Ty

peC

onst

ruct

ion

Met

hod

330

7Ca

lifor

nia13

C002

220

07GO

ODYE

ARS

CREE

K

Au

g-08

75

70

331

8Ca

lifor

nia28

0153

R C2

220

07UP

BNS

F AM

TRAK

SUI

SUN

BANo

v-09

78

72

332

9M

innes

ota

27V6

520

07M

N 12

1 NB

Apr-1

19

99

4Pr

ecas

t33

310

Minn

esot

a27

V66

2007

I-35W

Ram

pAu

g-11

88

84

Prec

ast

334

11M

innes

ota

27V7

320

07I-3

5W R

amp

Aug-

118

88

4Pr

ecas

t33

512

North

Car

olina

1290

103

2007

Cape

Fear

Rive

r - I-

140 /

US-

17 B

ypas

sJu

n-08

77

72

336

13Or

egon

1973

9 001

1205

720

07S

UMPQ

UA R

& C

ORP I

-5 (H

wy 0

01) S

BNo

v-06

88

80

337

14Pe

nnsly

vania

6670

7699

0245

720

2007

Susq

uhan

na B

ridge

Turn

pike (

I-76)

May

-08

88

81

pre-

cast,

span

-by-s

pan

338

15Pe

nnsly

vania

6670

7699

0245

730

2007

Susq

uhan

na B

ridge

Turn

pike (

I-76)

May

-08

88

81

pre-

cast,

span

-by-s

pan

339

16Te

xas

1208

5005

0001

374

2007

IH 45

SB

- Galv

esto

n Bay

77

340

17Ca

lifor

nia34

-000

7L20

08Sa

n Fra

nsisc

o-Oa

kland

Bay

Brid

ge S

kyw

ayJu

n-08

78

75

341

18Ca

lifor

nia34

-000

7R20

08Sa

n Fra

nsisc

o-Oa

kland

Bay

Brid

ge S

kyw

aySe

p-08

78

75

342

19M

innes

ota

2740

920

08Sa

int A

ntho

ny Fa

lls B

ridge

New

I-35

W S

B

Oct-1

18

88

2Pr

ecas

t34

320

Minn

esot

a27

410

2008

Saint

Ant

hony

Falls

Brid

ge N

ew I-

35W

NB

Oc

t-11

88

82

Prec

ast

344

21M

innes

ota

27V7

520

08I-3

5W R

amp

Aug-

118

88

4Pr

ecas

t34

522

Minn

esot

a27

V76

2008

TH 62

WB

Aug-

118

88

4Pr

ecas

t34

623

Minn

esot

a27

V79

2008

I-35W

Ram

pAu

g-11

88

84

Prec

ast

347

24M

ississ

ippi

SA43

0000

0000

051

2008

Lazy

Roa

dNo

v-09

88

81

348

25No

rth C

aroli

na 64

0103

 2007

Wilm

ingto

n Byp

ass

Jun-

107

76

234

926

Calif

ornia

10 02

99

2009

SOUT

H FO

RK EE

L RIV

ER

Jul-0

97

87

035

027

Calif

ornia

30 00

5320

09GA

RDNE

R LA

NE

Oct-0

97

87

035

128

Calif

ornia

30 00

5420

09M

URPH

YS G

RADE

ROA

D

Oc

t-09

78

70

352

29Ca

lifor

nia30

0055

2009

PENS

TOCK

AQU

EDUC

T

Oc

t-09

78

70

353

30Ca

lifor

nia30

0056

2009

ANGE

LS C

REEK

Oc

t-09

78

70

354

31Ca

lifor

nia33

C023

9R20

09AR

ROYO

DEL

VAL

LE

Oc

t-09

78

70

355

32Ne

w Je

rsy13

1516

920

09Sh

rew

sbur

y Rive

r - N

J-36

Dec-0

99

99

635

633

New

York

1060

919

2009

Brya

nt A

ve H

emps

tead

Ha

Rt 25

ADe

c-10

99

92

357

34Te

xas

2003

6005

0802

179

2009

Trinit

y Rive

r IH

10 W

B7

735

835

Texa

s13

1580

0604

0100

420

09FM

2031

Inte

rcoas

tal W

ater

way

88

359

36Flo

rida

7207

6120

10I/9

5 I-2

95 N

orth

Flyo

ver

Jul-1

08

88

036

037

Minn

esot

a82

855

2010

I-494

EBOc

t-11

88

84

CIP

361

38M

issou

ri33

066

2010

MIS

SISS

IPPI R

VR, N

. BRO

A (Pr

estre

ssed

Con

crete

App

roac

h) St

eel C

ont.

Jun-

107

99

0Ca

ble S

taye

d36

239

Miss

ouri

3285

420

10IS

29 S

- Le

vee

Jan-

109

99

0Ca

ble S

taye

d36

340

Wes

t Virg

inia

0000

0000

020A

842

2010

I-64 E

B Ka

naw

ha R

iver B

ridge

4077

39

89

3Ba

lance

d Can

tilev

er

Cons

tructi

on

Page 30: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges
Page 31: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

I-35W, Minneapolis MinnesotaMain Photo Courtesy of FIGG; Inset Photos Courtesy of Shutterstock

Page 32: ASBI Durability Survey of Segmental Concrete Bridges

Follow us on142 Cimarron Park Loop, Suite F, Buda, Texas 78610-2837 Tel: 512.523.8214 n Fax: 512.523.8213

e-mail: [email protected] n website: www.asbi-assoc.org