Upload
imogene-weaver
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ASH 2008Advances in ITP Research
both Basic and Clinical
Huiping Sun
26-Feb-2009
ASH Program of ITP Reports
• ASH 50th Anniversary Review
• Education Program
• Oral Session
• Poster Session
• Satellite Symposium
ASH 50th Anniversary Review
• Megakaryopoiesis and Thrombopoiesis
by K Kaushansky
Education Program
• Helicobacter Pylori and Chronic ITP• Viral-Associated Immune Thrombocytop
enic Purpura• The Pathophysiology of ITP Revisited: In
effective Thrombopoiesis and the Emerging Role of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in the Management of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Helicobacter Pylori and
Chronic ITP• Virulence factors of H pylori such as CagA
and VacA play specific roles in the primary colonization and infection
• H pylori neutrophil-activation protein (HP-NAP) and the cell wall lopopolycacchride (LPS) induced the host immune response which caused polarized T helper 1(Th1) response of the host.
Table 1. Proportion of Helicobacter pylori(HP)-positive and HP-negative adult patients with ITP achieving a platelet count response. HP+
responders
HP+
Non-responders
HP-
responde
rs
HP-
Non-responders
Definition
of
response
Country
of
origin
Morimoto
2007
7 12 0 3 ① Japan
Asahi
2006
6 26 0 11 ② Japan
Inaba
2005
11 25 0 10 ③ Japan
Takahashi
2004
8 15 0 5 ④ Japan
Michel
2004
1 15 0 10 ⑤ USA
Ando
2004
10 17 0 2 ⑥ Japan
Hino
2003
12 21 0 3 ⑦ Japan
Overall
response
65(49.6%) 131 0 44
① Platelet count increase by 20 or more above baseline
② Increase in platelet count by 100 or more by 24 weeks
③ Platelet count above 100
④ Platelet count increase by 20 or more above baseline
⑤ Platelet count at least 50 and double from baseline
⑥ Platelet count above 90
⑦ Significant increase in platelet count
Table 2. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (CITP) Authors Total number Number of infected (%)
Pawlotsly et al (1995) 139 14(10)
Pivetti et al (1996) 33 12(36)
Garcia-Suarez et al (2000) 51 13(22)
Sakuraya et al (2002) 79 11(14)
Zhang et al (2003) 247 33(13)
Rajan et al (2005) 250 76(30)
Total 799 159(20)
Study only included patients with platelet counts of less than 25x109/L.
Viral-Associated Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
(HIV &HCV)
Novel agents under
clinical investigations
Clinical trials of novel agents
Romiplostim (AMG 531)
Thrombopoietin (TPO) peptide mimetic Binds at the endogenous TPO-binding site Weekly subcutaneous administration
Eltrombopag (Promacta SB49711)
TPO non-peptide mimetic Binds at the intramembrane portion of the TPO receptor Daily oral administration
AKR-501 (YM477)
TPO non-peptide mimetic Binding remote from endogenous TPO-binding site Daily oral administration
Indications currently under investigation
Autoimmune thrombocytopenia Thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease Thrombocytopenia associated with the treatment of hepatitis C virus Thrombocytopenia induced by chemotherapy for malignancy Thrombocytopenia associated with intrinsic marrow abnormalities Thrombocytopenia associated with the treatment of hematologic malignancy
Eltrombopag (RAISE) Abs #400
• 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in previously treated adults with ITP with plt counts <30000/ul
Results: • Pts n=197 (e=135,p=62)• E group: 8 times more likely to achieve plt counts 50000~400000/uL
(OR[95%CI]=8.2[4.32,15.38];p<0.001)• Baseline median platelet counts were 16000/uL in both groups and
never exceeded 30000/uL in the placebo group.• E group: platelets fose to 36000/uL after 1 week and ranged from 52
000 to 91000/uL for the remainder of the study.• Plt counts returned to near baseline 2 weeks after stopping eltrombo
pag.• Pts responded to eltrombopag regardless of previous therapy.• Fewer pts treated with eltrombopag had any bleeding or clinically si
gnificant bleeding throughout the trial.• AEs: overall incidence of AEs was similar.
Eltrobopag (EXTENT)Abs #401
• An ongoing, open-label study designed to assess the long-term safety and clinical benefit of eltrobopag in patients with chronic ITP
Results: • Pts n=165 ( refractory or non refractory)• 75% of refractory patients achieved plt counts ≥5
0000/uL and 2Xbaseline, compared to 84% of non-refractory pts (p=0.1425).
• Weekly median plt counts in both groups remained at or above 50000/uL from week 1 through week 39.
• The proportion of pts with significant bleeding in both groups was lower than baseline at any point from week 1 through week 39.
RomiplostimAbs#402
• Long-term treatment with Romiplostin in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia purpura(ITP): 3-year update from an open-label extension study
Possible adverse effects of thrombopoietic growth factor therapy
Thrombocytosis Thrombosis Tumor/leukemia cell growth Interaction with other cytokines Formation of neutralizing antibodies cross-reactive with native thrombopoietin Stem cell depletion Platelet activation and acceleration of pathophysiologic processes Increased bone marrow reticulin or collagen deposition Rebound thrombocytopenia below baseline upon sudden cessation of therapy
Rituximab
• Treat the patients with either ITP or TTP with CD20 monoantibody.
(Poster)( Abs#2289, 2297, 3433)
Rituximab (375 mg/m2;Roche France, Paris, France was infused intravenously Once weekly for 4 weeks.
Francesco Zaja M.D.
Clinica Ematologica
University of Udine, Italy
.
DEXAMETHASONE PLUS RITUXIMAB VS DEXAMETHASONE
IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT PATIENTS WITH
IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA (ITP)
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
RITUXIMAB IN ITP: RATIONALE FOR STUDY DESIGN
Objective:
• to evaluate Rituximab efficacy and safety in a prospective
randomized study
Selection of the patients:
• ITP (ASH guidelines)
• adults (very high probability of chronic disease)
• ≤ 20 x 109/L platelet count (high risk disease)
• front line (homogeneous population)
For internal use only
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Primary• sustained response: PLT 50 x 109/L at 6 months with no additional
therapy after day 30
Secondary• safety profile: incidence of serious adverse events
• initial response: PLT 50-100-150 x 109/L day + 30
• activity of Dexamethasone + Rituximab salvage therapy
• identification of factors predictive of sustained response
• immunologic assessment
• pharmacokinetics
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
STUDY TREATMENTS
days
D D
D RTX
D: Dexamethasone 40 mg po, on days 1, 2, 3, 4
D D
D D D RTX RTXRTX
1 2 3 4 7 14 21 28
1 2 3 4 7 14 21 28
days
ARM A: Dexamethasone
ARM B: Dexamethasone + Rituximab
RTX: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV, on days 7, 14, 21, 28
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
ENROLLMENT
• Start enrollment: June 2005
• Stop enrollment in June 2007, after having accrued
101 patients, when the results of the first interim
analysis on 50 patients indicated a 52% advantage
of sustained response for Dexamethasone +
Rituximab arm (81% vs 29%).
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
PATIENTS CHARACTERISTICS
Dexa N=52 Dexa + RTX N=49
Male vs Female 37% vs 63% 45% vs 55%
Median age, years 49 49
PLT 10 x 109/L 24 (46%) 22 (45%)
PLT 11-20 x 109/L 28 (54%) 27 (55%)
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
EFFICACY: INITIAL RESPONSE
Initial
response
(day +30)
PLT 50 x 109/L
(Overall Response) PLT 100 x 109/L PLT 150 x 109/L
DexaDexa
+ RTXP Dexa
Dexa
+ RTXP Dexa
Dexa
+ RTXP
ITT 27% 68% < 0.001 23% 48% 0.015 18% 36% 0.178
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
EFFICACY: SUSTAINED RESPONSE
Sustained
response,
(month +6)
PLT 50 x 109/L
(Sustained Response)PLT 100 x 109/L PLT 150 x 109/L
DexaDexa
+ RTXP Dexa
Dexa
+ RTXP Dexa
Dexa
+ RTXP
ITT 36% 63% 0.004 33% 53% 0.019 25% 43% 0.029
PP 39% 85% <0.001 37% 77% <0.001 29% 65% 0.002
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-UdineML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
FACTORS PREDICTIVE OF SUSTAINED RESPONSE
Factors P
Age NS
Sex NS
Platelets < vs > 10 x 109/L NS
Baseline CD20 lymphocyte count NS
Baseline IgG serum level NS
Treatment (dexa plus rituximab vs dexa) 0.004
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
PATIENTS OF ARM A “RESCUED” WITH DEXA+RTX
Sustained
response
(month +6)
PLT 50 x 109/L
(sustained response)PLT 100 x 109/L PLT 150 x 109/L
Patients: 27 56 % 44 % 37 %
For internal use only
Follow up in patients who achieved sustained response
Dexa N= 11 Dexa + RTX N= 23Dexa + RTX
salvage therapy N= 13
Median FU, months (range) 18 (10-26) 22 (10-34) 18 (10-34)
Relapse rate (PLT < 50x109/L) 2 (18%) 2 (9%) 1 (8%)
Time to relapse, months 10, 14 18, 30 10
0.0
00.
25
0.5
00.
75
1.0
0C
um
ula
te p
roba
bilit
y
0 10 20 30 40Months
Salvage Therapy Arm A
Arm B
Dexa + RTXsalvage therapy
Dexa + RTXDexa
Dexa Dexa + RTXDexa + RTX
salvage therapy
2 years RFS 78% 94% 90%
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
TOXICITY
Dexa N= 52 Dexa + RTX N= 49Dexa + RTX
salvage tx N= 27
Patients with any adverse events 26 (50%) 37 (76%) 18 (67%)
Patients with
serious adverse events
1 (2%) 3 (6%) 3 (11%)
1. Rib fracture 5
months after Dexa
1. Platelet decrease, in-pt
hospitalization 18 days
after the 4th RTX.
2. SV tachycardia during the
1st RTX (stop RTX).
3. Interstitial pneumonia one
month after the 4th RTX.
1. Platelet decrease, in-pt
hospitalization 11 days
after the 4th RTX.
2. Convulsion during
the 1st RTX (stop RTX).
3. TIA
No toxic or hemorragic deaths observed
P= NS
P= 0.006
For internal use only
Therapy Baseline Week 24 P value
IgG, mean
value (g/L)
Arm A
Arm B
12.86
11.32
9.33
9.70
0.050
0.002
IgA, mean
value (g/L)
Arm A
Arm B
2.19
2.44
1.85
1.71
0.367
< 0.001
IgM, mean
value (g/L)
Arm A
Arm B
1.57
1.09
1.11
0.71
0.805
< 0.001
CD20+ ly mean
value x 109/L
Arm A
Arm B
0.42
0.33
0.20
0.00
0.895
< 0.001
CHANGES OF IgG, IgA, IgM and CD20+LYMPHOCYTES
Clinica Ematologica-UdineML18542 study
For internal use only
ML18542 study Clinica Ematologica-Udine
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this randomized study indicate that Rituximab plus
a single course of Dexamethasone vs a single course of
Dexamethasone monotherapy:
• improves the rate of initial response (68% vs 27%)
• improves the rate of sustained response (63% vs 36%)
• is an active salvage therapy in 56% of patients refractory to
Dexamethasone monotherapy
• has increased incidence of AEs with similar incidence of SAEs
For internal use only
R. Fanin Udine
M. Baccarani Bologna
P. Mazza Taranto
F. Lauria Siena
L. Gugliotta Reggio Emilia
A. Zaccaria Ravenna
F. Ferrara Napoli
E. Angelucci Cagliari
S. Amadori Roma, Tor Vergata
G. Leone Roma, Cattolica
E. Morra Milano
G. Visani Pesaro
V. Liso Bari
S. Mirto Palermo
G. Pizzolo Verona
G. Semenzato Padova
G. Rossi Brescia
A. Gallamini Cuneo
G. Fioritoni Pescara
R. Foà Roma, La
Sapienza
....... . .
.. ...
.
.
...
..
AKNOWLEDGEMENTS
M. Regazzi Pavia (PK studies)
F. Soldano, M. Isola Udine (Statistics)E. Gamba
For internal use only