1 ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK IN INDONESIA The 4 The 4 th th Meeting of th Working Group on Meeting of th Working Group on the Asian Highway Priority Routes the Asian Highway Priority Routes Bangkok, Thailand 27-28 September 2011
Microsoft PowerPoint - Asian HW-Indonesia.pptxASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK
IN INDONESIA
The 4The 4thth Meeting of th Working Group onMeeting of th Working
Group on the Asian Highway Priority Routesthe Asian Highway
Priority Routes
Bangkok, Thailand 27-28 September 2011
2
Denpasar – Surabaya – Surakarta –Semarang – Cikampek – Jakarta
–Merak. Ferry : Ketapang-Gilimanuk
AH-2 :
Banda Aceh – Medan – Dumai –Pekanbaru – Jambi – Palembang
–Bakauheni. Ferry : Bakauheni – Merak.
AH-25 :
Non Toll Road 1,128 km. Toll Road 409 km. Ferry 8 km.
Non Toll Road 2,586 km Toll Road - km. Ferry 26 km.
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~
same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
Banda Aceh
Government Policy on Development & Maintenance of AH
Routes
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~
same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
Banda Aceh
Sibolga
Padang
Batam
Bengkulu
Pangkalpinang
AH - 25
AH - 2
Strategy • The optimization of existing road network and its
operation • Widening the links to reach the minimum standard •
Quality improvement of the links to desirable service level • The
priority will be according to the following order : crossing
border, provision of proper road signs and road marking, technical
standard adjustment, road safety and the development of missing
links.
Mid-Term National Development Plan •Capacity Expansion of Eastern
Trunk Road of Sumatera (where the majority of AH-25 laid on) with
minimum width 7 m. •Capacity Expansion of North Coast Trunk Road of
Java (where AH-2 laid on from Jakarta to Semarang) with minimum
width 14 m. •Capacity Expansion of Middle Trunk Road of Java (where
AH-2 laid on from Surakarta to Surabaya) and continue to Banyuwangi
via North Coast Trunk Road with minimum width 7m. •Capacity
Expansion of Southern Trunk Road of Bali (where AH-2 laid on from
Gilimanuk to Denpasar) with minimum width 6 m.
#
Current Status of AH Network Condition on June 2011
• In General, Road Condition of AH Route are relatively good. More
than 93 % are in stable condition which mean there shouldn’t be any
obstacle using the road anytime, any weather. The driver may run up
to 60 km/hr in flat terrain on uncongested traffic.
• The Fewer bad condition laid on north Sumatera and Pemalang-
Tegal, while the other poor laid on Jambi, Southern Sumatera and
Cirebon-Brebes.
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~
same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
AH - 25
AH - 2
0.001 - 4
4.001 - 8
8.001 - 12
12.001 - 100
Good
Fair
Poor
Bad
Good Fair Bad AH2 882.68
618.80
36.01 AH25
968.91
1,445.70
171.74 Grand Total
1,851.58 2,064.50
207.75
Good Fair Bad AH2 57% 40% 2% AH25 37% 56% 7% Grand Total 45%
50% 5%
Condition (Km) AHRoute
#
Bandar Lampung
Tanjung Pinang
Current Status of AH Network Width of Carriage Way on June
2011
• The most advanced route by the capacity point of view, is AH
Route No.2 that laid from Merak to Semarang which almost all the
road already meet 14 m.
• The Java Island itself, all the road already has minimum width 7
m.
• In order to meet government policy where the eastern trunk road
of Sumatera should have minimum width 7 m, there are still several
homework which scattered along the route, but the most are Riau and
Lampung.
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~
same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
Legend
0.1 - 4.499
4.5 - 5.499
5.5 - 5.999
6 - 6.999
7 - 13.999
14 - 100
< 4.5 m
*) the data is only covered non-toll road
< 4.5 m 4.5 6 m 6 7 m
7 14 m >= 14 m AH2
10.57
59.07
600.83
867.01
AH25
1.50
862.84
1,593.44
128.57
Grand Total
1.50
10.57
921.92
2,194.27
995.58
< 4.5 m 4.5 6 m 6 7 m
7 14 m >= 14 m AH2 0% 1% 4% 39% 56%
AH25 0.1% 0% 33% 62% 5% Grand Total 0% 0% 22% 53% 24%
Carriageway Width (Km)
Carriageway Width (%)
AHRoute
AHRoute
Current Status of AH Network Classification and Design Standards as
June 2011
Major On-Going Projects 2011
Bandar Lampung
Tanjung Pinang
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.1 - Link Name :
BTS. KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE - PANTON LABU/SIMPANG (KM 328) - Capacity
Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 -
Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006 - Link Name : BTS.
KOTA LANGSA - BTS. PROV. SUMUT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) :
45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil
Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 26 - Link No. : 021 - Link Name :
PEMATANG REBA - SIBERIDA - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) :
27450000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 4021109 - Rehabillitation
Cost (mil Rp) : 3958500
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 27 - Link No. : 028 - Link Name : BTS.
PROV. RIAU - MERLUNG - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 200000000
- Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) :
0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 34 - Link No. : 015 - Link Name :
SIMPANG INDRALAYA - MERANJAT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) :
7890000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil
Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 36 - Link No. : 013.1 - Link Name :
BUJUNG TENUK - TERBANGGI BESAR - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) :
56573430 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil
Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-2 - AH No. : 29 - Link No. : 013 - Link Name : BTS.
KOTA CIREBON - LOSARI (BTS. PROV. JATENG) - Capacity Expansion Cost
(mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 51569964 -
Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km)
Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) AH2
10
95,243,674
49
212,578,499
45
127,167,805
AH25
284
1,209,975,462
22
77,980,418
96
124,717,035
Grand Total
295
1,305,219,136
71
290,558,917
140
251,884,840
Capacity Expansion AHCode
Bandar Lampung
Tanjung Pinang
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.2 - Link Name :
PANTON LABU - SP PEUREULAK - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 -
Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil
Rp) : 25000000
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006 - Link Name :
LANGSA - BTS.SUMUT - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment
Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) :
51188000
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 30 - Link No. : 002.2 - Link Name :
BTS. KODYA (MANDALA) - MUARA BULIAN - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp)
: 8901912 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 22500000 - Capacity
Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 30000000
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 21 - Link No. : 006.2 - Link Name :
KANDIS - DURI - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3000000 -
Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 9750000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil
Rp) : 31075000
Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km)
Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) AH2
57
258,723,145
145
535,996,196
69
109,375,315
AH25
163
683,989,972
70
250,089,300
85
170,388,912
Grand Total
220
942,713,117
215
786,085,496
154
279,764,227
AHCode Capacity Expansion Betterment/Reconstruction
Rehabillitation/Periodic Maint.
g <= 6 Bil Rp
6 - 20 Bil Rp
20 - 45 Bil Rp
45 - 90 Bil Rp
Programme of Road Signs Installation
4.25 BILLION RUPIAH2010 -20112. AH-25 (450 UNIT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
AND 550 UNIT SINGLE SIGNS)
2.5 BILLION RUPIAH2008 - 20091. AH-2 (250 UNIT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
AND 300 UNIT SINGLE SIGNS)
6.75 BILLION RUPIAHTOTAL COST
COST ESTIMATION TIME PLANNED
ROUTE NUMBERING
IN INDONESIA
National Road Safety Master Plan (NRSMP) 2011 – 2035
AHCode RSA Blackspot Total AH2 9 13 22 AH25 2 14 16
In the road design projects, Directorate General of Highway (DGH)
has been considering safety, such as on EINRIP projects and SRIP
projects as part of National Road Safety Master Plan (NRSMP) 2011 –
2035.
Following the step above, DGH has been carrying out Road Safety
Audit (RSA) including in detailed design stage, road work, and
pre-opening stage.Road safety audit identified a range of issues
that will potentially affect the safety of users of the road when
the works are completed.
DGH has the Strategic Plan to reduce the number of hazardous
locations in Indonesia. Directorate General of Highways (DGH) have
done Crash Reduction Investigation and prepared the countermeasures
to address road safety issues at the East Corridor in Sumatra
(Bakauheni to Banda Aceh via Palembang) and the North Coast Road in
Java (Cilegon to Banyuwangi via Jakarta and Surabaya). Respectively
these corridors are 1800 Km and 1200 Km long. DGH had collect crash
data from Indonesian National Traffic Police before doing the
investigation.
Monitoring Road Safety Audit And Blackspot Investigation
Report
Concluding Remarks
• Asian Highway in Indonesia at this time continues to progress and
is expected to reach the target at the end of 2014, where the AH-25
will have a standard class II and AH-2 of the Merak- Cikampek
already be Primary class, Cikampek-Semarang as Class I and
Semarang-Surabaya-Banywangi as Class II and Gilimanuk Denpasar as
Class III.
• Various development cooperation and the improvement of road
infrastructure needs to be done to accelerate the achievement of
standards
• Asian highway network availability is less meaningful without
being followed by various facilities in co-operation of traffic and
inter-modal transportation.
13