Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
April 28, 2017
Mr. Ed Jones Washington State Department of Ecology, NWRO 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452
Re: West of 4th Site Agreed Order #DE10402 Draft Conceptual Pilot Study Work Plan, Site Unit 2
Dear Mr. Jones:
Please find enclosed the Draft Conceptual Pilot Study Work Plan for Site Unit 2. This report was prepared by Farallon Consulting on behalf of the four potentially liable persons (PLPs) [Art Brass Plating, Blaser Die Casting, Capital Industries, and PSC Environmental Services, LLC] identified by Ecology in the Agreed Order #DE10402 for the West of 4th Site.
Sincerely,
Aspect consulting, LLC Dana Cannon, LHG W4 Project Coordinator [email protected]
Attachments: Draft CVOC Pilot Study Work Plan for Site Unit 2 S:\Art Brass Plating 050067\W4 Ecology Correspondence\Cover Letters\SU2CVOCWorkPlanDraft_Cover_042717.docx
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
CONCEPTUAL PILOT STUDY WORK PLAN
Site Unit 2 Seattle, Washington
Submitted by: Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. 975 5th Avenue Northwest
Issaquah, Washington 98027
Farallon PN: 457-009
For: West of 4th Avenue Group
Site Unit 2 Joint Deliverable Capital Industries, Inc. Blaser Die Casting Co.
Stericycle Seattle, Washington
April 27, 2017
Prepared by:
Jennifer L. Moore Associate Scientist
Reviewed by:
Jeffrey Kaspar, L.G., L.H.G. Principal Geologist
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
i P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 ORGANIZATION ................................................................................... 1-2
2.0 CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN FOR PILOT STUDY ............................. 2-1
3.0 PRELIMINARY CLEANUP LEVELS ........................................................... 3-1
4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL ....................................................................... 4-1 4.1 GEOLOGY .............................................................................................. 4-1
4.1.1 Fill Unit ........................................................................................ 4-1 4.1.2 Younger Alluvium ....................................................................... 4-1 4.1.3 Older Alluvium ............................................................................ 4-1
4.2 HYDROGEOLOGY ................................................................................ 4-2 4.3 NATURE AND EXTENT OF GROUNDWATER
CONTAMINATION................................................................................ 4-2 4.4 GROUNDWATER GEOCHEMISTRY .................................................. 4-3
5.0 PROPOSED PILOT STUDY ............................................................................ 5-1 5.1 REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY................................................................. 5-1 5.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE ......................................................................... 5-1 5.3 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION .............................................. 5-2 5.4 BASELINE GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ........................................ 5-3 5.5 PERMITTING ......................................................................................... 5-3 5.6 PILOT STUDY APPROACH.................................................................. 5-4 5.7 MONITORING ........................................................................................ 5-4
5.7.1 ZVI Injection Monitoring ............................................................ 5-5 5.7.2 Performance Monitoring .............................................................. 5-6
6.0 PILOT STUDY DOCUMENTATION ............................................................. 6-1 6.1 PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND REPORTING ...................................... 6-1
6.1.1 Field Implementation Work Plan ................................................. 6-1 6.1.2 Quarterly Status Reports .............................................................. 6-2 6.1.3 Annual Progress Report ............................................................... 6-2 6.1.4 Pilot Study Completion Report .................................................... 6-2
7.0 SCHEDULE AND REPORTING ..................................................................... 7-1
8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................. 8-1
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
ii P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
FIGURES Figure 1 Site Diagram
Figure 2 Groundwater Monitoring Well Locations
Figure 3 Pilot Study Area Detail
TABLES Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 2 Summary of Preliminary Cleanup Levels
Table 3 Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
iii P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
ACRONYMNS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Aspect Aspect Consulting
BDC Blaser Die Casting Co.
bgs below ground surface
CI Capital Industries, Inc.
CVOCs chlorinated volatile organic compounds
Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Farallon Farallon Consulting, L.L.C.
Feasibility Study West of 4th Site Unit 2 Feasibility Study, Seattle, Washington
dated August 11, 2016, prepared by West of Fourth Group and
Pacific Groundwater Group
Fill Unit The shallow portion of the Younger Alluvium that has been
modified and comprises heterogeneous layers of gravelly sand,
silt, and silty sand with scattered inert anthropogenic debris such
as bricks and broken glass
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Technical memorandum regarding FINAL West of 4th
Groundwater Monitoring Program Plan 2017 through Draft
Cleanup Action Plan, W4 Joint Deliverable, Agreed Order No.
DE 10402 dated March 21, 2017, from Ms. Janet Knox of
Pacific Groundwater Group to Mr. Ed Jones of the Washington
State Department of Ecology
HASP Health and Safety Plan
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
iv P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
ISCR in-situ chemical reduction
PCE tetrachloroethene
PGG Pacific Groundwater Group
PLP potentially liable parties
PRB permeable reactive barrier
PSC PSC Environmental Services, LLC
Site The West of 4th Group Site consisting of Site Unit 1 and Site
Unit 2
Stericycle Burlington Environmental, LLC, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of PSC Environmental Services, LLC, which is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc.
SU1 Site Unit 1
SU2 Site Unit 2
TCE trichloroethene
WAC Washington Administrative Code
West of 4th Group Art Brass Plating, Inc.; Blaser Die Casting Co.; Capital
Industries, Inc.; and PSC Environmental Services, LLC
Work Plan Conceptual Pilot Study Work Plan, Site Unit 2, Seattle,
Washington dated April 27, 2017, prepared by Farallon
Consulting, L.L.C. (this document)
ZVI zero-valent iron
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
1-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. (Farallon) has prepared this Conceptual Pilot Study Work Plan (Work
Plan) on behalf of Art Brass Plating, Inc.; Blaser Die Casting Co. (BDC); Capital Industries, Inc.
(CI); and Burlington Environmental, LLC1 (collectively referred to herein as the West of 4th
Group), which are the potentially liable parties (PLPs) at the West of 4th Group Site (herein referred
to as the Site). The Site consists of Site Unit 1 (SU1) and Site Unit 2 (SU2) as depicted on Figure
1. The Art Brass Plating, Inc. property is located at SU1. The CI and BDC properties are located
at SU2.
This Work Plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Agreed Order No. DE
10402 entered into by the West of 4th Group and the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology) in April 2014, and the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation
as established in Chapter 173-340 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 173-340).
1.1 OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the Work Plan is to provide the general overview and framework for
implementation of an in-situ chemical reduction (ISCR) pilot study at SU2 as discussed in the West
of 4th Site Unit 2 Feasibility Study, Seattle, Washington dated August 11, 2016, prepared by West
of Fourth Group and Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG) (West of Fourth Group and PGG 2016)
(Feasibility Study). The ISCR technology that will be evaluated includes direct injection of zero-
valent iron (ZVI) into the subsurface to create a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) and treat affected
groundwater. The objectives of the pilot study include:
• Evaluate whether ISCR can reduce chlorinated volatile organic compound (CVOC)
concentrations in groundwater and eliminate the potential to affect the Lower Duwamish
Waterway;
1 Burlington Environmental, LLC, is a wholly owned subsidiary of PSC Environmental Services, LLC (PCS), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc., hereafter referred to in this document as “Stericycle” for simplicity.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
1-2 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
• Evaluate application of ISCR via direct injection to refine the understanding of whether
ZVI can be successfully distributed in the subsurface to create a PRB with the capability
to treat affected groundwater;
• Provide sufficient data regarding ISCR via direct injection to evaluate the feasibility of
applying injection-based technologies at SU2; and
• Provide information regarding injection-based technologies necessary to re-evaluate
cleanup alternatives presented in the Feasibility Study prior to preparation of the draft
Cleanup Action Plan.
1.2 ORGANIZATION
This Work Plan summarizes pertinent background information and provides context and a general
framework for the ISCR pilot study at SU2. This Work Plan is organized into the following
sections:
• Section 1, Introduction, presents an overview of the Site, the objectives, and the Work
Plan;
• Section 2, Constituents of Concern, presents the constituents of concern that will be
targeted during the pilot study;
• Section 3, Preliminary Cleanup Levels, presents the revised preliminary cleanup levels
for the Site that will be used to evaluate whether the remedial technology can meet the
cleanup objectives;
• Section 4, Conceptual Site Model, presents a description of the Site features, geology and
hydrogeology, nature and extent of contamination, and groundwater geochemistry;
• Section 5, Proposed Pilot Study, presents a description of the proposed pilot study,
including a discussion of the remedial technology, the pilot study approach, and operational
and performance monitoring programs;
• Section 6, Pilot Study Documentation, presents a description of documents that will be
generated to govern and report on pilot study activities;
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
1-3 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
• Section 7, Schedule and Reporting, summarizes the schedule for implementation of the
pilot study and associated reporting deliverables that will be submitted to Ecology; and
• Section 8, References, lists the documents cited in this Work Plan.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
2-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
2.0 CONSTITUENTS OF CONCERN FOR PILOT STUDY
The pilot study is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of an ISCR technology on reducing
concentrations of CVOCs in groundwater at the Site. The pilot study location is proximate to
monitoring well cluster CI-15 (Figures 2 and 3). Tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene
(TCE) are not present in groundwater at this location and cis-1,2-dicloroethene has been detected
at low concentrations (Table 1). Vinyl chloride concentrations have remained elevated in
groundwater at a depth of approximately 50 feet below ground surface (bgs) (Table 1). Therefore,
the pilot study will evaluate the effectiveness of ISCR to reduce or eliminate vinyl chloride in
groundwater.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
3-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
3.0 PRELIMINARY CLEANUP LEVELS
Preliminary cleanup levels for the Site are based on potential exposure pathways and were
established in the Revised Preliminary Cleanup Standards Memorandum, W4 Joint Deliverable,
Seattle, Washington dated September 12, 2014, from Farallon to Mr. Ed Jones of Ecology
(Farallon 2014). The preliminary cleanup levels were updated on January 17, 2017 to reflect
updates to human health criteria in the Clean Water Act promulgated by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) on November 15, 2016.
Current preliminary cleanup levels for the Site are summarized in Table 2 of this Work Plan. An
objective of the pilot study will be to evaluate whether ISCR is able to reduce concentrations of
vinyl chloride to less than current preliminary cleanup levels.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
4-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
The following section presents a summary of the conceptual site model for the Site, including
descriptions of the geology, hydrogeology, nature and extent of contamination, and groundwater
geochemistry affecting the Site and the pilot study area.
4.1 GEOLOGY
The lithology of the Site has been subdivided into two alluvial units, the Younger Alluvium and
the Older Alluvium (Aspect Consulting [Aspect] 2014). The shallow portion of the Younger
Alluvium has been modified and is referred to in Site documents as the Fill Unit. A detailed
description of these units is provided below.
4.1.1 Fill Unit The Fill Unit comprises heterogeneous layers of gravelly sand, silt, and silty sand with scattered
inert anthropogenic debris such as bricks and broken glass. The Fill Unit is present at depths
between approximately 0 and 8 feet bgs. The boundary between the Fill Unit and the Younger
Alluvium can be difficult to distinguish.
4.1.2 Younger Alluvium The Younger Alluvium comprises channel and floodplain fluvial deposits associated with the
Duwamish River (Booth and Herman 1998). The Younger Alluvium consists of a sandy silt to
silty sand unit overlying a silty fine- to medium-grained sand unit. Scattered natural debris,
including wood and organic material, is present in the Younger Alluvium. The Younger Alluvium
extends to a depth of approximately 25 to 30 feet bgs on the eastern portion of the Site and to a
depth of approximately 55 feet bgs on western portions of the Site, proximate to the Duwamish
River.
4.1.3 Older Alluvium The Older Alluvium comprises deltaic and estuarine alluvial materials. The Older Alluvium
consists of interbedded silty fine sand and sandy silt. A silt aquitard and bedrock were identified
in deep borings advanced east of 4th Avenue South (PSC 2003). These units were not encountered
during drilling at the Site.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
4-2 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
4.2 HYDROGEOLOGY
The PLPs for the Site refer to standardized hydrogeologic units in each of their documents that
correspond to the lithologic units that are described above (Aspect 2014). These hydrogeologic
units are:
• Water Table Interval: The Water Table Interval extends to a depth of up to 20 feet bgs;
• Shallow Interval: The Shallow Interval ranges in depth from 20 to 40 feet bgs; and
• Intermediate Interval: The Intermediate Interval includes groundwater monitored at the
Site at depths below 40 feet bgs.
Groundwater in these three hydrogeologic units flows west and southwest toward the Duwamish
River with little seasonal fluctuation. A downward vertical gradient is present between the Water
Table and Shallow Intervals. The vertical gradients between the Shallow and Intermediate
Intervals fluctuate between upward and downward in monitoring well clusters east of East
Marginal Way. The vertical gradient between the Shallow and Intermediate Intervals in
monitoring well clusters west of East Marginal Way, proximate to the Duwamish River, generally
are upward.
Tidal studies were documented in the remedial investigation reports for Art Brass Plating, Inc.
(Aspect 2012) and CI (Farallon 2012). Water levels at the Site are tidally influenced by Puget
Sound. This tidal influence is demonstrated in localized, transient flow reversals similar to those
observed at other sites in the vicinity of the Duwamish River. Tidal flow reversals diminish to 0.5
foot or less than 800 feet east-northeast of the Duwamish River.
4.3 NATURE AND EXTENT OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
CVOCs in groundwater, including PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride, migrate from source areas to the
west in SU1 and to the southwest in SU2, parallel to the flow of groundwater toward the Duwamish
River. Vinyl chloride is present at concentrations exceeding preliminary cleanup levels in the
Shallow and Intermediate Intervals in the pilot study area. As previously stated, PCE and TCE
have not been detected in the Water Table, Shallow, or Intermediate Intervals in the pilot study
area. Based on the groundwater analytical data to date, CI, Stericycle, and BDC could be among
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
4-3 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
the sources of vinyl chloride concentrations in the Shallow Interval. The source for vinyl chloride
concentrations in the Intermediate Interval is undetermined, but is consistent with a source area
up-gradient of the pilot study area. The Stericycle property generally is accepted as contributing
low concentrations of vinyl chloride across SU1 and SU2.
The SU1 and SU2 PLPs currently are evaluating potential locations of elevated vinyl chloride
present at the pilot study area and an area further north at monitoring well cluster CG-141. The
collective SU1 and SU2 remedial investigation results are being reviewed again to determine
whether the source of vinyl chloride is associated with the existing PLP source areas or a potential
unidentified orphan site. Additional investigation work may be conducted prior to implementing
the pilot study to confirm the source(s) of the elevated vinyl chloride. This information will be
used to refine the conceptual site model for the elevated vinyl chloride and to confirm the PLPs
that will participate in the pilot study and future cleanup activities, if needed.
4.4 GROUNDWATER GEOCHEMISTRY
The groundwater at the Site generally is an anaerobic environment conducive to reductive
dechlorination of CVOCs via microbial biodegradation. The Water Table Interval is overall the
least reducing of the groundwater intervals, whereas reducing conditions increase with depth. PCE
and TCE are readily reduced to their daughter products: cis-1,2-dichloroethene; trans-1,2-
dichlorethene; vinyl chloride; and ethene (Aspect 2014). Both cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl
chloride have been detected in monitoring well cluster CI-15, but only vinyl chloride has been
detected at concentrations exceeding preliminary cleanup levels (Table 2). Ethene, while not a
constituent of concern, is an indicator of complete reductive dechlorination of PCE or TCE.
Ethene concentrations in monitoring well cluster CI-15 are elevated (Table 3) relative to most
other areas of the Site, indicating that biodegradation processes are prevalent at this location.
ISCR is expected to create a more highly reducing environment that will accelerate the rate of
biodegradation. ISCR also reacts chemically with CVOCs, resulting in abiotic destruction of these
compounds. Groundwater geochemistry will be monitored during the pilot study to evaluate the
biotic and abiotic changes and corresponding effect on CVOCs present.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
5.0 PROPOSED PILOT STUDY
This section presents a description of the pilot study, including a discussion of the remedial
technology, the pilot study approach, and operational and performance monitoring programs.
5.1 REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGY
The remedial technology chosen for this pilot study is ISCR using ZVI. ZVI will add an abiotic
component to CVOC degradation at the Site and create a reductive environment that will enhance
the ongoing microbial biodegradation of CVOCs. The ZVI will be injected into a linear series of
up to 10 injection points to form a PRB to treat groundwater (Figure 3). Groundwater is treated
as it flows through the PRB. The PRB will neither reduce CVOC concentrations up-gradient of
the pilot study area nor affect existing vinyl chloride down-gradient of monitoring well cluster CI-
15. ZVI will not travel significantly beyond the injection radius with the flow of groundwater,
and is a technology that relies on CVOCs in groundwater to be in contact with the ZVI for
sufficient time to allow the chemical reduction reaction to occur and reduce or eliminate CVOCs.
Effectiveness of ISCR will be evaluated through assessment of the physical distribution of the ZVI
in the subsurface in a manner that successfully creates a PRB capable of effectively reducing
concentrations of CVOCs. This will be accomplished through advancement of post-injection
borings in the PRB area to physically observe the distribution of ZVI. The second measure of
effectiveness of ISCR will be reduction in CVOC concentrations within a reasonable time frame
following establishment of the PRB. This will be accomplished using the existing monitoring
wells CI-15-40 and CI-15-60 supplemented with two additional monitoring wells screened within
the Intermediate Interval. In addition to monitoring CVOC concentrations, groundwater
geochemical parameters will be monitored for evidence of chemical changes in water quality and
evidence of increased biodegradation.
5.2 UTILITY CLEARANCE
Public and private utility locating services will be contracted to clear the proposed performance
monitoring well and ZVI injection point locations prior to drilling and well installation activities.
Information pertaining to the locations of subsurface utilities will be documented for future
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-2 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
reference. Drilling locations may be modified as necessary during field activities based on access
considerations and the locations of utilities and other features.
5.3 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION
Access to the Jack in the Box property down-gradient of the proposed PRB is necessary to install
two performance monitoring wells to monitor the effectiveness of ISCR treatment and to track the
influence of the ZVI following injection (Figure 3). Ecology will assist in acquiring access to
areas required to conduct the pilot study. If access to the Jack in the Box property cannot be
obtained, an alternative pilot study location may be selected. However, the conceptual approach
presented herein will remain the same.
A drilling contractor licensed in the state of Washington will be subcontracted to advance the
borings and install two performance monitoring wells to depths up to 65 feet bgs. These borings
will be advanced using a track-mounted sonic drill rig. Sonic drilling is preferential because the
drilling method is easier to mitigate heaving sand conditions that impact well installation in this
area. Further, sonic drilling allows for a better soil sampling process for observing subtle changes
in the soil matrix that may affect the distribution of ZVI and transport of CVOCs.
Soil samples will be collected continuously below a depth of 30 feet bgs during advancement of
the borings to examine continuous cores and refine understanding of local geology that could affect
the pilot study. Subsurface conditions will be documented on boring logs, and soil samples from
selected intervals may be retained for CVOC analysis for waste profiling needs or to refine future
cleanup activities. The information recorded on the boring logs will include soil types, visual and
olfactory evidence of the potential presence of contaminants, depth to groundwater, and volatile
organic vapor concentrations as measured using a photoionization detector.
Monitoring wells will be installed at target depths of 55 and 65 feet bgs, respectively. The
monitoring wells will be constructed using 2-inch-diameter Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride casing
with a 5-foot section of 0.010-inch slotted screen. The target depths for the monitoring well
screens are approximately 50 to 55 feet bgs and 60 to 65 feet bgs where the highest anticipated
vinyl chloride concentrations are present. The monitoring wells will be completed with 8-inch-
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-3 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
diameter well monuments mounted flush with the surrounding grade. Each monitoring well will
be developed immediately following installation.
5.4 BASELINE GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
The newly installed monitoring wells will be allowed to recover for 48 hours prior to conducting
baseline groundwater sampling. Baseline groundwater samples will be collected from the two
newly installed monitoring wells and the existing monitoring wells, CI-15-40 and CI-15-60. The
groundwater sampling will be conducted in general accordance with standard procedures cited in
the technical memorandum regarding FINAL West of 4th Groundwater Monitoring Program Plan
2017 through Draft Cleanup Action Plan, W4 Joint Deliverable, Agreed Order No. DE 10402
dated March 21, 2017, from Ms. Janet Knox of PGG to Mr. Jones of Ecology (PGG 2017)
(Groundwater Monitoring Plan). The groundwater samples will be submitted to a Washington-
accredited laboratory for analysis of:
• CVOCs by EPA Method 8260C;
• Sulfate by American Society for Testing and Materials Method D516-07;
• Methane, ethane, and ethene by EPA Method RSK 175; and
• Dehalococcoides microbial populations by laboratory-specific DNA testing methods.
Farallon will also measure ferrous iron concentrations directly in the field using a field test kit.
Additional geochemical parameters that will be directly measured during sample collection using
field instrumentation will include temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction
potential, and specific conductance. The geochemical parameters cited above represent the key
parameters that will be used to evaluate abiotic and biotic activity throughout the pilot study.
5.5 PERMITTING
Farallon will work with the Seattle Department of Transportation to obtain a street use permit for
implementation of ISCR in the 1st Avenue South right-of-way. A traffic control service will be
contracted to prepare a traffic control plan for the pilot study area and to provide lane closure
signage and flaggers, as needed, due to the arterial nature of 1st Avenue South.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-4 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
Farallon will complete the Ecology underground injection control program registration process as
required by the Underground Injection Control Program (WAC 173-218) to register the ZVI
injection points as EPA Type 5B6 Class V injection wells for the purpose of improving
groundwater quality at a cleanup site. The underground injection control program registration
form and required supporting documentation will be submitted to Ecology for review and approval
prior to injection of the ZVI.
5.6 PILOT STUDY APPROACH
The pilot study will be implemented in 1st Avenue South proximate to monitoring well cluster CI-
15 (Figure 3). The PRB will be oriented across the 1st Avenue South right-of-way at a
perpendicular (90 degree) angle with the flow of groundwater. Microscale ZVI will be mixed at
the Site with injection additives to suspend and distribute ZVI at each of the injection points. A
drilling and injection contractor with experience using ISCR will mix and inject the ZVI slurry at
the pilot study area. The ZVI slurry will be injected under high pressure and high flow in 2.5-foot
lifts to form the PRB at depths ranging from approximately 45 to 65 feet bgs, corresponding with
the depths of highest vinyl chloride concentration detections. The injection points will be spaced
on 10-foot centers with an estimated radius of influence of 10 feet (Figure 3).
A conservative (i.e., non-reactive) dye tracer will be mixed with the ZVI slurry to assess
distribution of ZVI in the subsurface and to monitor the movement of groundwater during the
performance monitoring period.
Dosing of the ZVI slurry and the conservative dye tracer will be calculated and presented in the
planned Field Implementation Work Plan to be submitted to Ecology after key administrative
milestones pertaining to the pilot study design have been achieved. The pilot study period,
including injection and formation of the PRB and subsequent performance monitoring, is expected
to comprise 2 years of pilot study activities.
5.7 MONITORING
ZVI injection and post-ZVI injection performance monitoring will be used to monitor the ZVI
injection as it is occurring and the effectiveness of ISCR over up to a 2-year monitoring period,
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-5 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
which will be dependent upon performance monitoring results. The monitoring work that will be
conducted is described in the sections herein.
5.7.1 ZVI Injection Monitoring The drilling and injection contractor will monitor the injection rate and pressure at each injection
point continuously to minimize fracturing and development of preferential pathways in the soil
matrix during injection. The total volume of ZVI slurry that is injected at each injection point will
be documented to facilitate evaluation of the technology and potential future application of ISCR.
The ZVI slurry mixture will be sampled during the injection process to verify the dosing of the
ZVI mixture that was injected to form the PRB is consistent with design parameters.
Water levels and geochemical parameters, including but not limited to dissolved oxygen, oxidation
reduction potential, ferrous iron, and specific conductance, will be monitored at the closest
monitoring wells to the injection location, monitoring well cluster CI-15. The monitoring results
may be indicative of the radius of influence of the injections, potential preferential pathways within
the soil matrix, or other factors that may be considered if the technology is applied in other areas
of the Site or at SU2. The monitoring well cluster and other performance monitoring wells will
also be monitored during injection and post-injection for evidence of the conservative tracer.
Up to five direct-push borings will be advanced within and on the northern and southern sides of
the PRB approximately 2 weeks after injection of the ZVI slurry has been completed to assess the
distribution of the ZVI slurry within the soil matrix (Figure 3). The distance of these observation
borings from the PRB may be adjusted as follows to assess the radius of influence of the ZVI
injections.
The first observation boring will be advanced approximately 10 feet from the PRB to assess the
radius of injection of the ZVI slurry. If ZVI and the conservative dye tracer are not observed in
this observation boring, then the next observation boring will be advanced at a distance closer to
the PRB. If physical evidence of ZVI and the conservative dye tracer is observed in the first
observation boring, then the next observation boring will be advanced at approximately 15 feet
from the PRB to assess whether the ZVI injection achieved a greater radius of influence than
originally estimated. One observation boring will be advanced within the PRB to assess the
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-6 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
distribution of ZVI and potential for preferential distribution. The observation borings will be
advanced to a depth of at least 65 feet bgs. The actual depths and locations of borings will be
based on field observations.
5.7.2 Performance Monitoring Post-injection performance monitoring will include quarterly groundwater sampling of the two
newly installed performance monitoring wells and existing monitoring wells CI-15-40 and CI-15-
60 for the first year to assess the effectiveness of ISCR to increase the rate of vinyl chloride
reduction via abiotic and biotic processes.
The groundwater sampling will be conducted in general accordance with standard procedures cited
in the Groundwater Monitoring Plan. The groundwater samples will be submitted to a
Washington-accredited laboratory for analysis for:
• CVOCs by EPA Method 8260C;
• Sulfate by American Society for Testing and Materials Method D516-07; and
• Methane, ethane, and ethene by EPA Method RSK 175.
Dehalococcoides microbial populations will be assessed annually to determine whether the ISCR
treatment is also increasing the potential for biodegradation. Farallon will also measure ferrous
iron concentrations directly in the field using a field test kit. Additional geochemical parameters
that will be directly measured during sample collection using field instrumentation will include
temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, oxidation-reduction potential, and specific conductance.
Performance monitoring samples will also be visually screened in the field for evidence of the
presence of the conservative dye tracer to evaluate local groundwater flow direction and
groundwater flow rate proximate to the pilot study area.
The baseline sampling event and subsequent four quarterly groundwater sampling events will be
evaluated to determine whether sufficient data is available to conclude that ISCR has the potential
to reduce vinyl chloride concentrations. Ecology will be provided an Annual Progress Report as
described under Section 6, Pilot Study Documentation. If necessary, the pilot study will continue
for a second year. Performance groundwater sampling will be conducted semiannually in the
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
5-7 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
second year, coinciding with the standard March and September Site groundwater monitoring
program. The pilot study will conclude following the second year of performance groundwater
sampling.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
6-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
6.0 PILOT STUDY DOCUMENTATION
This section summarizes the pilot study documents that will be generated during the pilot study
activities.
6.1 PROJECT DOCUMENTS AND REPORTING
6.1.1 Field Implementation Work Plan A Field Implementation Work Plan for the pilot study will be submitted to Ecology following
Ecology approval of this Work Plan and confirmation that access to the Jack in the Box property
and 1st Avenue South can be acquired to conduct the pilot study. The Field Implementation Work
Plan will provide details regarding implementation of the pilot study, including: the final pilot
study location; ZVI injection design criteria; performance monitoring details; criteria for
evaluating effectiveness of the pilot study; and reporting requirements. The Field Implementation
Work Plan will also include the supporting documents that follow.
6.1.1.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan
The Field Implementation Work Plan will include a Sampling and Analysis Plan to guide
the sampling efforts associated with the pilot study. The Sampling and Analysis Plan will
include a discussion of sample locations and frequency to establish baseline groundwater
conditions prior to the pilot study and monitor the effectiveness of the pilot study for up to
2 years following injection of the ZVI.
The Sampling and Analysis Plan will include standard operating procedures related to the
specific field tasks that will be performed during the pilot study. These standard operating
procedures may include: field sampling and documentation; soil sampling; monitoring
well installation/construction; groundwater sampling procedures; and waste management.
6.1.1.2 Quality Assurance Project Plan
The Field Implementation Work Plan will include a Quality Assurance Project Plan to
assess the quality and reproducibility of analytical data generated in association with the
pilot study. The Quality Assurance Project Plan will also discuss quality assurance/quality
control samples that will be collected to support the pilot study.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
6-2 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
6.1.1.3 Health and Safety Plan
The Field Implementation Work Plan will include a Health and Safety Plan (HASP)
required for all field activities in accordance with WAC 173-340-810. The HASP will
comply with the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and the
Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (Chapter 49.17 of the Revised Code of
Washington).
6.1.2 Quarterly Status Reports Quarterly status will be submitted to Ecology in the standard Quarterly Progress Reports prepared
for each SU2 PLP. The Quarterly Progress Reports will include a summary of the performance
monitoring results as the pilot study progresses.
6.1.3 Annual Progress Report An Annual Progress Report will be submitted to Ecology to document overall progress during the
first year of the pilot study and evaluate whether continuing a second year is necessary to meet the
pilot study objectives. The first Annual Progress Report will provide details on the implementation
of the pilot study, provide a summary of the first year of performance monitoring data, and discuss
work planned for the second year of the pilot study, if necessary.
6.1.4 Pilot Study Completion Report The Pilot Study Completion Report will be submitted to Ecology following the conclusion of the
2-year pilot study, and will include a summary of the overall pilot study results and conclusions.
The Pilot Study Completion Report will summarize the effectiveness of ISCR in increasing the
rate at which vinyl chloride concentrations are reduced, and will include conclusions regarding the
effects of ISCR on biotic activities. The Pilot Study Completion Report also will discuss whether
and how implementation of the technology can be achieved at other areas.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
7-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
7.0 SCHEDULE AND REPORTING
This section summarizes the schedule for implementation of the pilot study and associated
reporting deliverables that will be produced. The milestones associated with implementation of
the pilot study and the potential schedule to achieve those milestones is provided below.
Deliverables Anticipated Schedule
Submittal of Work Plan April 28, 2017
Submittal of Field Implementation Work Plan Within 45 days of confirmation of access to
the Jack in the Box property and 1st Avenue
South.
Submittal of Quarterly Progress Reports Each quarter following implementation of
the pilot study.
Submittal of Annual Progress Report Within 30 days following receipt of
performance monitoring results for the
fourth quarterly sampling event at the
conclusion of the first year of the pilot
study.
Submittal of Pilot Study Completion Report Within 30 days following receipt of the final
performance monitoring sampling event
results for the second year of the pilot study.
Field Work Anticipated Schedule
Permits and Access Agreements Initiated upon Ecology approval of the
Work Plan.
Performance Monitoring Well Installation Within 30 day of approval of Field
Implementation Work Plan.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
7-2 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Event Within 2 weeks following installation of
new performance monitoring wells.
ZVI Injection/PRB Formation To be scheduled upon Ecology approval of
the Field Implementation Work Plan, and
following receipt of applicable street use
and injection permits and review of the
baseline groundwater monitoring event.
Advancement of Observation Borings Within 2 weeks following completion of the
ZVI injection and PRB formation.
Initial Year of Performance Monitoring Initial quarterly groundwater monitoring
event to be conducted within 90 days of ZVI
injection. Subsequent three events to be
conducted quarterly thereafter.
Second Year of Performance Monitoring To be initiated following Ecology review of
Annual Progress Report and consensus that
pilot study should continue for a second
year.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
8-1 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
8.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aspect Consulting (Aspect). 2012. Remedial Investigation Report, Art Brass Plating. Prepared
for Art Brass Plating, Inc. September 27.
______. 2014. Memorandum Regarding Site Conceptual Model Technical Memorandum
(Revised), W4 Joint Deliverable. From Aspect Consulting, LLC. To Ed Jones,
Washington State Department of Ecology. December 15.
Booth, D.B., and L. Herman. 1998. Duwamish Basin Groundwater Pathways Conceptual Model
Report. City of Seattle, Office of Economic Development.
Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. (Farallon). 2012. Revised Draft Remedial Investigation Report,
Capital Industries, Inc., 5801 3rd Avenue South, Seattle, Washington, Agreed Order No. E
5348. Prepared for Capital Industries, Inc. October.
______. 2014. Technical Memorandum Regarding Revised Preliminary Cleanup Standards
Memorandum, W4 Joint Deliverable, Seattle, Washington. From Farallon. To Ed Jones,
Washington State Department of Ecology. September 12.
Pacific Groundwater Group (PGG). 2006. Blaser Die Casting Soil and Groundwater
Investigation Report. October 30.
———. 2007. Blaser Die Casting Pilot Source Control Action Plan. April 10.
———. 2008. Status Report, Blaser Die Casting, 5700 Third Avenue South, Seattle, Washington.
June.
———. 2017. Technical Memorandum regarding FINAL West of 4th Groundwater Monitoring
Program Plan 2017 through Draft Cleanup Action Plan, W4 Joint Deliverable, Agreed
Order No. DE 10402. From Janet Knox. To Ed Jones, Washington State Department of
Ecology. March 21.
PSC Environmental Services, Inc. (PSC). 2003. Final Comprehensive Remedial Investigation
Report for Philip Services Corporation’s Georgetown Facility. November 14.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
8-2 P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
West of Fourth Group and Pacific Groundwater Group (West of Fourth Group and PGG). 2016.
West of 4th Site Unit 2 Feasibility Study, Seattle, Washington. August 11.
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
FIGURES
CONCEPTUAL PILOT STUDY WORK PLAN Site Unit 2
Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
CONSULTING
Checked By: JK Disc Reference:
SITE DIAGRAMWEST OF 4TH AVENUE GROUP
SITE UNIT 2SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Quality Service for Environmental Solutions | farallonconsulting.com
Farallon
WashingtonIssaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
OregonPortland | Bend | Baker City
CaliforniaOakland | Sacramento | Irvine
Date: 4/27/2017Drawn By: tperrinDocument Path: Q:\Projects\457 CapitalIndust\009 Feasibility\Figure1_FeasPilotArea_Sitemap.mxd
FARALLON PN: 457-009
DRAFT
G ART BRASS PLATING, INC.
G BLASER DIE CASTING CO.
G
CAPITAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
G
STERICYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
DUWAMISH RIVER
SLIP #2TERMINAL 115
S EDDY ST
12TH
AVE S
S PEARL ST
3RD A
VENU
E SOU
TH
S BAILEY ST
S DAWSON ST
I-5 FWY
SOUTH BRANDON STREET
SOUTH BENNETT STREET
SOUTH DAWSON STREET
SOUTH HOMER STREET
7TH A
VENU
E SOU
TH
UTAH
AVEN
UE SO
UTH
SOUTH FRONT STREET
CORS
ON AV
ENUE
SOUT
H
CARL
ETON
AVEN
UE SO
UTH
SOUTH FINDLAY STREET
ELLIS
AVE S
SOUTH MEAD STREET
SOUTH ORCAS STREET
EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH
FLOR
A AVE
NUE S
OUTH
SOUTH
LUCIL
E STR
EET
SOUTH DORIS STREET
5TH A
VENU
E SOU
THSR 99
SOUTH MICHIGAN STREET
SOUTH NEBRASKA STREET
1ST A
VENU
E SO
UTH
SOUTH VALE STREET
4TH A
VENU
E SOU
TH
SOUTH HARNEY STREET
SOUTH FIDALGO STREET
6TH AVENUE SOUTH
AIRPORT WAY SOUTH
I-5 FREEWAY
OHIO
AVEN
UE SO
UTH
WEST MARGINAL WAY SOUTHWEST
SITE UNIT #1(SU1)
SITE UNIT #2(SU2)
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE 1
³0 250 500
SCALE IN FEET
ART BRASS PLATING, INC.
BLASER DIE CASTING CO.
CAPITAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
STERICYCLE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
SITE UNIT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
CONSULTING
Checked By: JK Disc Reference:
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSWEST OF 4TH AVENUE GROUP
SITE UNIT 2SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Quality Service for Environmental Solutions | farallonconsulting.com
Farallon
WashingtonIssaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
OregonPortland | Bend | Baker City
CaliforniaOakland | Sacramento | Irvine
Date: 4/26/2017Drawn By: tperrinDocument Path: Q:\Projects\457 CapitalIndust\009 Feasibility\Figure2_FeasPilotArea_SampleLocs.mxd
FARALLON PN: 457-009
DRAFT
!A!A !A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A !A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A
!A!A!A!A
!A
!A!A!A
!A!A!A
!A
!A!A
!A!A!A
!A
!A!A!A!A
!A
!A!A!A
!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A!A!A!A
!A!A!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A!A!A
!A!A!A
!A!A!A
!A!A
!A
!A
!A
!A!A!A
!A!A
!A
!A!A!A!A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A!A
!A!A!A
!A!A!A
!A
!A !A
!A
!A!A
!A
!A
!A
G ART BRASS PLATING, INC.
G BLASER DIE CASTING CO.
G
CAPITAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
G
MW-17-40
GMW-17-60 G
MW-19-40
G
MW-19-60
G
MW-3
G
MW-3-30
G
MW-3-50
G
MW-8-70
G
MW-9
G
BDC-11-40
GBDC-11-60
G BDC-2-WTG
BDC-3-60
G
CG-137-40
G
CG-137-WT
GPSC-CG-140-30 G
PSC-CG-140-40
G
CG-141-40 G
CG-141-50
GCG-141-WT
CI-11-30
G
CI-1-40
G
CI-1-60
G
CI-7-40
G
CI-MW-1-40
G
CI-MW-1-60
G
CI-MW-1-WT
MW-2
G
MW-20-40
G
MW-20-60
GMW-22-30MW-22-50
G
MW-23-30MW-23-50
MW-24MW-24-30MW-24-50
G
MW-25-50
G
MW-25-75
GMW-26-40
G
MW-26-55
MW-27
MW-4
G
MW-5MW-6MW-6-30
G
MW-7
G
MW-8
G
MW-8-30
G
BDC-10-40
G BDC-10-60
G
BDC-11-WT
G
BDC-1-WT
G
BDC-3-40
G
BDC-3-WTG
BDC-4-WT
G
BDC-6-30
G
BDC-6-60
G
BDC-6-WT
PSC-CG-133-40
G
PSC-CG-134-40
G
PSC-CG-134-WT
G PSC-CG-136-40G
PSC-CG-136-WT
G
CG-140-70
G CG-140-WT
PSC-CG-144-35
PSC-CG-145-35
PSC-CG-151-25
G
PSC-CG-166-80
G CI-10-35G
CI-10-65
G
CI-10-WT
CI-11-60
CI-11-WT
CI-12-30CI-12-60
CI-12-WT
G
CI-13-30
G
CI-13-60
G
CG-137-50
G CI-13-WT
G
CI-14-35
CI-14-70CI-14-WT
G CI-15-40G
CI-15-60
CI-16-30CI-16-60
G
CI-16-WT
CI-17-30CI-17-WT
CI-18-30CI-18-WT
CI-19-30G
CI-19-WT
G
CI-7-60
G
CI-8-40
G CI-8-60
G
CI-9-40
G
CI-9-70
G
CI-9-WT
GMW-3 MW-4
G
MW-5
MW-6
G
MW-7
G
MW-8
CI-20-80
G
BDC-13-40
PLANT 1 PLANT 2PLANT 2CANOPY
PLANT 3 PLANT 4
STORAGE YARD
GULLINDUSTRIESBUILDING
BLASER DIE CASTING FACILITY
OLYMPICMEDICAL BUILDING
MARTIN SIGNFABRICATION
G
CITY LIGHT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
G
OTT REAL ESTATEPROPERTY(JACK IN THE BOX)
FRAY EQUIPMENTCOMPANY
MOBILE CRANECOMPANYKAPSTONE CONTAINER
CORPORATION
CERTAINTEED GYPSUM INC
MULTI-TENANTWAREHOUSE
MULTI-TENANTWAREHOUSE
MULTI-TENANTWAREHOUSE
FITTINGSINCCOMPANY
CAL PORTLAND
SLIP #2
BUCKNER WEATHERBYBUILDING
PACIFICLAMPSUPPLY
B & OI
CHRISTFERSON RADER& KIEF BUILDING
BECKWITH ANDKUFFEL BUILDING
PLANT 5
DUWAMISH RIVER
SITE UNIT 1
SITE UNIT 2
UTAH
AVEN
UE SO
UTH
2ND A
VENU
E SOU
TH
SOUTH FINDLAY STREET
SOUTH LUCILE STREET
5TH A
VENU
E SOU
TH
SR 99
SOUTH ORCAS STREET
SOUTH FRONT STREET
EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH
1ST A
VENU
E SO
UTH
4TH A
VENU
E SOU
TH
OHIO
AVEN
UE SO
UTH
6TH A
VENU
E SOU
TH
FIGURE 2
³0 150 300
SCALE IN FEET
!A ART BRASS PLATING MONITORING WELL
!A BLASER DIE CASTING MONITORING WELL
!A CAPITAL INDUSTRIES MONITORING WELL
!A STERICYCLE MONITORING WELL
SITE UNIT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
NOTE: COLOR IS USED ON THE MAP AND MAY NOT REPRODUCE IN BLACK AND WHITE.
CONSULTING
Checked By: JK Disc Reference:
PILOT STUDY AREA DETAILWEST OF 4TH AVENUE GROUP
SITE UNIT 2SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Quality Service for Environmental Solutions | farallonconsulting.com
Farallon
WashingtonIssaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
OregonPortland | Bend | Baker City
CaliforniaOakland | Sacramento | Irvine
Date: 4/26/2017Drawn By: tperrinDocument Path: Q:\Projects\457 CapitalIndust\009 Feasibility\Figure6_su2_pilotdetail.mxd
FARALLON PN: 457-009DRAFT
<
A
<
A
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
%%2
%%2
%%2
%%2
%%2!A!A!A!A
!A
!A
!A
!A !A!A
!A!A
!A
CI-10-35G
PSC-CG-140-30
G
PSC-CG-140-40
CG-140-70CG-140-WT
CG-141-40CG-141-50
CG-141-WT
CI-10-65G
CI-10-WT
CI-15-40
CI-15-60
CI-20-80
OLYMPICMEDICAL BUILDING
OTT REAL ESTATEPROPERTY(JACK IN THE BOX)
BECKWITH ANDKUFFEL BUILDING
CAPITAL INDUSTRIESPLANT 5
1ST A
VENU
E SOU
TH
SOUTH FIDALGO STREET
SOUTH FIDALGO STREET
EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH
SITE UNIT 1
SITE UNIT 2
G
CAPITAL INDUSTRIESPLANT 1
CHEVRON STATION
FIGURE 3
NOTE: COLOR IS USED ON THE MAP AND MAY NOT REPRODUCE IN BLACK AND WHITE.
³0 25 50
SCALE IN FEET
!A ART BRASS PLATING MONITORING WELL!A BLASER DIE CASTING MONITORING WELL
!A CAPITAL INDUSTRIES MONITORING WELL!A STERICYCLE MONITORING WELL
<
APROPOSED PERFORMANCE MONITORINGWELLS
%%2 OBSERVATION BORING LOCATION!( ZVI INJECTION POINT LOCATION
G APPROXIMATE DIRECTION OFGROUNDWATER FLOW10' RADIUS OF INFLUENCE FOR INJECTIONPOINT
ZERO-VALENT IRON PERMEABLE REACTIVEBARRIERSITE UNIT 2 (SU2) PILOT STUDY AREASITE UNIT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
DRAFT—Issued for Regulatory Review
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\457-009 DRAFT Pilot Study WP.docx
TABLES
CONCEPTUAL PILOT STUDY WORK PLAN Site Unit 2
Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
1 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
CG-137-40-031513 CG-137-WT 3/15/2013 < 0.40 39 40 7.2 0.49CG-137-WT-080813 CG-137-WT 8/8/2013 < 0.20 38 38 9.2 0.77CG-137-WT-031314 CG-137-WT 3/13/2014 < 0.20 31 48 9.0 0.86CG-137-WT-092414 CG-137-WT 9/24/2014 < 0.40 28 54 9.2 0.73CG-137-WT-031815 CG-137-WT 3/18/2015 < 0.40 16 57 9.0 0.96CG-137-WT-092415 CG-137-WT 9/24/2015 < 0.40 14 60 8.7 0.61CG-137-WT-032316 CG-137-WT 3/23/2016 < 0.40 7.2 86 9.0 2.3CG-137-WT-092116 CG-137-WT 9/21/2016 < 0.40 7.5 98 10 0.67CI-10-WT-031413 CI-10-WT 3/14/2013 < 0.40 56 21 1.1 < 0.40CI-10-WT-080713 CI-10-WT 8/7/2013 < 0.40 50 25 1.4 < 0.40CI-10-WT-031314 CI-10-WT 3/13/2014 < 0.20 38 12 0.61 < 0.20CI-10-WT-092414 CI-10-WT 9/24/2014 < 0.40 38 51 1.6 < 0.40CI-10-WT-031815 CI-10-WT 3/18/2015 < 0.40 46 57 1.4 < 0.40CI-10-WT-092215 CI-10-WT 9/22/2015 < 0.40 40 72 1.8 < 0.40CI-10-WT-032416 CI-10-WT 3/24/2016 < 0.20 23 12 0.42 < 0.20CI-10-WT-092116 CI-10-WT 9/21/2016 < 0.40 31 81 2.3 < 0.40CI-10-WT-032917 CI-10-WT 3/29/2017 < 0.20 24 34 1.2 0.23CI-11-WT-031313 CI-11-WT 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.22 < 0.20 0.64CI-11-WT-031214 CI-11-WT 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-11-WT-032316 CI-11-WT 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.22 < 0.20 0.61CI-12-WT-031413 CI-12-WT 3/14/2013 < 0.20 0.31 0.59 < 0.20 2.9CI-12-WT-031114 CI-12-WT 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-12-WT-031715 CI-12-WT 3/17/2015 < 0.20 0.39 0.26 < 0.20 < 0.20
-- CI-12-WT 3/22/2016CI-13-WT-031313 CI-13-WT 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-13-WT-080613 CI-13-WT 8/6/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.3 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-13-WT-110514 CI-13-WT 11/5/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-13-WT-092315 CI-13-WT 9/23/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-13-WT-092016 CI-13-WT 9/20/2016 < 0.20 0.21 1.3 < 0.20 < 0.20
DUP-1-092016 CI-13-WT 9/20/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.1 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-13-WT-032817 CI-13-WT 3/28/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.3 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-14-WT-031413 CI-14-WT 3/14/2013 < 0.20 0.98 0.77 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-14-WT-080613 CI-14-WT 8/6/2013 < 0.20 1.7 1.2 < 0.20 < 0.20
DUP-1-080613 CI-14-WT 8/6/2013 < 0.20 1.4 0.92 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-14-WT-031214 CI-14-WT 3/12/2014 < 0.40 3.2 81 0.97 0.61CI-14-WT-092414 CI-14-WT 9/24/2014 < 0.20 7.4 34 0.55 0.25CI-14-WT-031715 CI-14-WT 3/17/2015 < 0.40 8.2 66 0.83 0.78CI-14-WT-092215 CI-14-WT 9/22/2015 < 0.20 4.8 3.7 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-14-WT-032316 CI-14-WT 3/23/2016 < 0.20 2.8 4.1 0.21 < 0.20CI-14-WT-092016 CI-14-WT 9/20/2016 < 0.20 4.1 13 0.5 < 0.20CI-14-WT-032817 CI-14-WT 3/28/2017 < 0.20 3.0 8.2 0.38 < 0.20
116 3 6.9 3 NR 4 559 3 1.3 3
Not Sampled - Well Inaccessible
Water Table Zone
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Water Table Zone
Water Table Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
2 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl ChlorideCI-16-WT-031513 CI-16-WT 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-16-WT-031214 CI-16-WT 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-16-WT-032316 CI-16-WT 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-17-WT-031313 CI-17-WT 3/13/2013 2.7 2.3 1.0 < 0.20 0.37CI-17-WT-080613 CI-17-WT 8/6/2013 1.9 2.0 4.7 < 0.20 0.99CI-17-WT-031114 CI-17-WT 3/11/2014 9.6 1.7 2.1 < 0.20 0.78CI-17-WT-110514 CI-17-WT 11/5/2014 7.0 2.6 3.9 < 0.20 2.6CI-17-WT-031715 CI-17-WT 3/17/2015 3.2 3.0 2.5 < 0.20 1.3CI-17-WT-092315 CI-17-WT 9/23/2015 3.7 2.4 5.8 < 0.20 3.2CI-17-WT-032216 CI-17-WT 3/22/2016 7.1 4.0 2.7 < 0.20 0.95CI-17-WT-092016 CI-17-WT 9/20/2016 < 0.20 0.24 2.1 < 0.20 0.67CI-17-WT-032817 CI-17-WT 3/28/2017 9.1 2.1 2.5 < 0.20 0.94CI-18-WT-031313 CI-18-WT 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-18-WT-031114 CI-18-WT 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-18-WT-032216 CI-18-WT 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-18-WT-032817 CI-18-WT 3/28/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-19-WT-031413 CI-19-WT 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-19-WT-031114 CI-19-WT 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-19-WT-032216 CI-19-WT 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-19-WT-033017 CI-19-WT 3/30/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-031313 CI-9-WT 3/13/2013 2.7 21 2.3 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-080713 CI-9-WT 8/7/2013 3.9 22 2.5 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-031214 CI-9-WT 3/12/2014 3.5 26 2.3 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-092314 CI-9-WT 9/23/2014 6.3 23 0.96 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-031715 CI-9-WT 3/17/2015 3.8 22 2.2 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-092315 CI-9-WT 9/23/2015 4.1 26 2.9 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-032316 CI-9-WT 3/23/2016 2.7 19 3.0 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-092016 CI-9-WT 9/20/2016 3.8 24 3.1 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-WT-032917 CI-9-WT 3/29/2017 9.6 34 3.4 < 0.20 < 0.20
MW-2-031915 MW-2 3/19/2015 < 0.40 17 72 4.4 1.1MW-2-092415 MW-2 9/24/2015 < 0.40 7.4 91 4.7 1.5MW-2-032316 MW-2 3/23/2016 < 1.0 12 110 5.9 1.5MW-2-092216 MW-2 9/22/2016 < 1.0 < 1.0 92 4.4 1.1MW-2-032917 MW-2 3/29/2017 < 0.20 26 24 4.4 < 0.20MW-3-031815 MW-3 3/18/2015 < 0.20 4.3 28 0.40 0.37MW-3-032316 MW-3 3/23/2016 < 0.20 5.4 22 0.38 0.25MW-3-032917 MW-3 3/29/2017 < 0.20 3.2 6.0 < 0.20 < 0.20
116 3 6.9 3 NR 4 559 3 1.3 3Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Water Table Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
3 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
MW-4-031313 MW-4 3/13/2013 < 0.20 1.7 1.1 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-080813 MW-4 8/8/2013 0.22 1.7 1.8 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-031314 MW-4 3/13/2014 < 0.20 1.3 1.1 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-092414 MW-4 9/24/2014 < 0.20 0.90 0.61 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-031715 MW-4 3/17/2015 < 0.20 0.88 0.46 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-092315 MW-4 9/23/2015 < 0.20 1.3 1.3 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-032416 MW-4 3/24/2016 < 0.20 0.97 0.68 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-4-092216 MW-4 9/22/2016 < 0.20 0.97 0.61 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-5-031815 MW-5 3/18/2015 < 0.40 50 32 0.87 1.4MW-5-032216 MW-5 3/22/2016 < 0.40 45 24 0.66 0.88MW-6-031915 MW-6 3/19/2015 6.8 3.2 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-6-032216 MW-6 3/22/2016 6.1 1.9 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-6-033017 MW-6 3/30/2017 5.3 2.6 0.29 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-7-031313 MW-7 3/13/2013 21 14 2.9 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-7-080813 MW-7 8/8/2013 8.6 4.6 4.7 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-7-031214 MW-7 3/12/2014 21 12 2.8 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-7-092314 MW-7 9/23/2014 11 5.5 3.3 < 0.20 0.20MW-7-031715 MW-7 3/17/2015 13 8.7 4.3 < 0.20 0.25MW-7-092315 MW-7 9/23/2015 12 4.6 3.1 < 0.20 0.74MW-7-032216 MW-7 3/22/2016 30 20 1.4 < 0.20 < 0.20MW-7-092016 MW-7 9/20/2016 8.8 4.7 2.4 < 0.20 0.23
CI-MW-7-032917 MW-7 3/29/2017 15 10 1.5 < 0.20 < 0.20116 3 6.9 3 NR 4 559 3 1.3 3
Water Table Zone
Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Water Table Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
4 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
CG-137-WT-031513 CG-137-40 3/15/2013 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 46CG-137-40-080813 CG-137-40 8/8/2013 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 46CG-137-40-031314 CG-137-40 3/13/2014 < 0.20 0.38 0.61 < 0.20 47CG-137-40-092414 CG-137-40 9/24/2014 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 49CG-137-40-031815 CG-137-40 3/18/2015 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 57CG-137-40-092415 CG-137-40 9/24/2015 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 42CG-137-40-032316 CG-137-40 3/23/2016 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 50CG-137-40-092216 CG-137-40 9/22/2016 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 34CG-141-40-031413 CG-141-40 3/14/2013 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 120CG-141-40-080713 CG-141-40 8/7/2013 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 < 1.0 170CG-141-40-031314 CG-141-40 3/13/2014 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.2 < 1.0 150CI-141-40-092314 CG-141-40 9/23/2014 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.0 < 1.0 170CG-141-40-031815 CG-141-40 3/18/2015 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.3 < 1.0 160CG-141-40-092315 CG-141-40 9/23/2015 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.4 < 1.0 190CG-141-40-032416 CG-141-40 3/24/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.35 < 0.20 20CG-141-40-092116 CG-141-40 9/21/2016 < 1.0 < 1.0 2.1 < 1.0 150CG-141-40-032917 CG-141-40 3/29/2017 < 1.0 < 1.0 1.6 < 1.0 130CI-10-35-031413 CI-10-35 3/14/2013 < 0.20 27 4.2 0.46 6.2CI-10-35-080713 CI-10-35 8/7/2013 < 0.20 24 5.1 0.44 9.3CI-10-35-031314 CI-10-35 3/13/2014 < 0.20 26 5.1 0.49 8.6CI-10-35-092414 CI-10-35 9/24/2014 < 0.20 19 4.4 0.39 10CI-10-35-031715 CI-10-35 3/17/2015 < 0.20 21 6.7 0.49 10CI-10-35-092215 CI-10-35 9/22/2015 < 0.20 20 4.9 0.47 9.8CI-10-35-032416 CI-10-35 3/24/2016 < 0.20 21 5.4 0.48 8.0CI-10-35-092116 CI-10-35 9/21/2016 < 0.20 17 5.5 0.45 11CI-10-35-032917 CI-10-35 3/29/2017 < 0.20 23 10 0.54 5.9CI-11-30-031313 CI-11-30 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.36 < 0.20 0.93CI-11-30-031214 CI-11-30 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.26 < 0.20 0.74CI-11-30-031915 CI-11-30 3/19/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.46 < 0.20 0.85CI-11-30-032316 CI-11-30 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.28 < 0.20 1.0
2.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Shallow Zone
Shallow Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
5 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
CI-12-30-031413 CI-12-30 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.69 < 0.20 7.6CI-12-30-080613 CI-12-30 8/6/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.2 < 0.20 22CI-12-30-031114 CI-12-30 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.47 < 0.20 1.5DUP-1-031114 CI-12-30 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.46 < 0.20 1.5
CI-12-30-092314 CI-12-30 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.54 < 0.20 3.9DUP-1-092314 CI-12-30 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.48 < 0.20 3.2
CI-12-30-031715 CI-12-30 3/17/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.36 < 0.20 1.3DUP2-031715 CI-12-30 3/17/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.38 < 0.20 1.4
CI-12-30-092215 CI-12-30 9/22/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.53 < 0.20 1.7DUP-1-092215 CI-12-30 9/22/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.50 < 0.20 1.6
CI-12-30-032216 CI-12-30 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.34 < 0.20 1.3CI-12-30-092016 CI-12-30 9/20/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.0 < 0.20 1.7CI-13-30-031313 CI-13-30 3/13/2013 < 0.20 0.33 33 < 0.20 0.43CI-13-30-031114 CI-13-30 3/11/2014 < 0.20 1.0 46 0.37 0.75CI-13-30-031715 CI-13-30 3/17/2015 < 0.40 1.3 57 0.51 0.51
DUP1-031715 CI-13-30 3/17/2015 < 0.40 1.2 54 0.43 0.51CI-13-30-032216 CI-13-30 3/22/2016 < 0.40 1.4 69 0.49 0.64DUP-1-032216 CI-13-30 3/22/2016 < 0.40 1.4 68 0.49 0.65
CI-13-30-032817 CI-13-30 3/28/2017 < 0.40 1.4 54 0.50 0.70CI-14-35-031413 CI-14-35 3/14/2013 < 0.40 48 36 0.68 1.4CI-14-35-080613 CI-14-35 8/6/2013 < 0.40 34 60 0.84 1.3CI-14-35-031214 CI-14-35 3/12/2014 < 0.40 42 58 1.3 0.97CI-14-35-092414 CI-14-35 9/24/2014 < 0.40 17 89 0.77 1.1CI-14-35-031715 CI-14-35 3/17/2015 < 1.0 26 100 1.1 1.3CI-14-35-092215 CI-14-35 9/22/2015 < 0.40 8.2 95 0.97 1.2CI-14-35-032316 CI-14-35 3/23/2016 < 0.40 14 68 1.0 1.2CI-14-35-092116 CI-14-35 9/21/2016 < 0.20 0.52 22 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-14-35-032817 CI-14-35 3/28/2017 < 0.40 13 67 1.1 1.2
2.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Shallow Zone
Shallow Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
6 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
CI-15-40-031513 CI-15-40 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.3 < 0.20 0.42DUP-3-031513 CI-15-40 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.5 < 0.20 0.42
CI-15-40-080713 CI-15-40 8/7/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.1 < 0.20 0.76DUP-2-080713 CI-15-40 8/7/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.0 < 0.20 0.75
CI-15-40-031314 CI-15-40 3/13/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.0 < 0.20 1.3DUP-3-031314 CI-15-40 3/13/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.0 < 0.20 1.3
CI-15-40-092314 CI-15-40 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.6 < 0.20 1.0DUP-2-092314 CI-15-40 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.7 < 0.20 1.2
CI-15-40-031815 CI-15-40 3/18/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.0 < 0.20 1.2CI-15-40-092315 CI-15-40 9/23/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.9 < 0.20 2.0DUP-2-092315 CI-15-40 9/23/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 3.0 < 0.20 1.7
CI-15-40-032416 CI-15-40 3/24/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.9 < 0.20 0.91DUP-3-032416 CI-15-40 3/24/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.9 < 0.20 0.96
CI-15-40-092116 CI-15-40 9/21/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 5.8 < 0.20 0.81CI-16-30-031513 CI-16-30 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-16-30-031214 CI-16-30 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-16-30-032316 CI-16-30 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-17-30-031313 CI-17-30 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.23CI-17-30-031114 CI-17-30 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-17-30-032216 CI-17-30 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.38DUP-2-032216 CI-17-30 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.36
CI-17-30-032817 CI-17-30 3/28/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.72CI-18-30-031313 CI-18-30 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-18-30-031114 CI-18-30 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.42CI-18-30-031715 CI-18-30 3/17/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-18-30-032216 CI-18-30 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-18-30-032817 CI-18-30 3/28/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-19-30-031413 CI-19-30 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.2 < 0.20 1.2CI-19-30-080613 CI-19-30 8/6/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.7 < 0.20 1.6CI-19-30-031114 CI-19-30 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.7 < 0.20 1.2CI-19-30-092314 CI-19-30 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.8 < 0.20 1.4CI-19-30-031815 CI-19-30 3/18/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.8 < 0.20 1.7CI-19-30-092215 CI-19-30 9/22/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.6 < 0.20 1.6CI-19-30-032216 CI-19-30 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.9 < 0.20 1.1CI-19-30-092016 CI-19-30 9/20/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.7 < 0.20 0.97DUP-2-092016 CI-19-30 9/20/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.6 < 0.20 0.91
CI-19-30-033017 CI-19-30 3/30/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.5 < 0.20 6.32.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2
Shallow Zone
Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Shallow Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
7 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
CI-7-40-031313 CI-7-40 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.78 < 0.20 1.1CI-7-40-080813 CI-7-40 8/8/2013 0.31 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.80CI-7-40-031214 CI-7-40 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.0 < 0.20 1.5CI-7-40-092314 CI-7-40 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.46CI-7-40-031715 CI-7-40 3/17/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.5 < 0.20 1.7CI-7-40-092315 CI-7-40 9/23/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.81CI-7-40-032216 CI-7-40 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.2 < 0.20 0.96CI-7-40-092016 CI-7-40 9/20/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.78CI-8-40-031413 CI-8-40 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 15 < 0.20 10CI-8-40-031314 CI-8-40 3/13/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 25 < 0.20 13CI-8-40-031815 CI-8-40 3/18/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 24 < 0.20 12CI-8-40-032216 CI-8-40 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 20 < 0.20 10CI-9-40-031313 CI-9-40 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 4.9 < 0.20 0.88CI-9-40-031214 CI-9-40 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 4.8 < 0.20 0.83CI-9-40-031715 CI-9-40 3/17/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 5.5 < 0.20 0.85CI-9-40-032316 CI-9-40 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 5.6 < 0.20 0.55
2.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2
CG-141-50-031413 CG-141-50 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CG-141-50-080713 CG-141-50 8/7/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CG-141-50-031314 CG-141-50 3/13/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.44CI-141-50-092314 CG-141-50 9/23/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CG-141-50-031815 CG-141-50 3/18/2015 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 140CG-141-50-092315 CG-141-50 9/23/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CG-141-50-032416 CG-141-50 3/24/2016 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 160CG-141-50-092116 CG-141-50 9/21/2016 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 140CG-141-50-032917 CG-141-50 3/29/2017 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 140
DUP-1-032917 CG-141-50 3/29/2017 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 150CI-10-65-031413 CI-10-65 3/14/2013 < 0.20 0.29 0.66 < 0.20 1.2CI-10-65-031314 CI-10-65 3/13/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.77 < 0.20 1.5CI-10-65-031815 CI-10-65 3/18/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.89 < 0.20 1.8CI-10-65-032416 CI-10-65 3/24/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.60 < 0.20 1.9CI-11-60-031313 CI-11-60 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.77CI-11-60-031214 CI-11-60 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.91CI-11-60-032316 CI-11-60 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.67
2.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2
Shallow Zone
Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Intermediate Zone
Intermediate Zone
Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Shallow Zone
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
8 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
CI-12-60-031413 CI-12-60 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-12-60-031114 CI-12-60 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
--- CI-12-60 3/17/2015--- CI-12-60 3/22/2015
CI-13-60-031313 CI-13-60 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20DUP-1-031313 CI-13-60 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
CI-13-60-031114 CI-13-60 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20DUP-2-031114 CI-13-60 3/11/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
CI-13-60-032216 CI-13-60 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-13-60-032817 CI-13-60 3/28/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
CG-137-50-031413 CI-137-50 3/14/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 4.1CG-137-50-080813 CI-137-50 8/8/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 3.9CG-137-50-031314 CI-137-50 3/13/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 3.1CG-137-50-031915 CG-137-50 3/19/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.0CG-137-50-092415 CG-137-50 9/24/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.5CG-137-50-032316 CG-137-50 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 1.6CG-137-50-092116 CG-137-50 9/21/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 3.1CI-14-70-031513 CI-14-70 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.28 < 0.20 0.41DUP-2-031513 CI-14-70 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.22 < 0.20 0.44
CI-14-70-032316 CI-14-70 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.77 < 0.20 0.34CI-14-70-032817 CI-14-70 3/28/2017 < 0.20 < 0.20 2.2 < 0.20 0.76CI-15-60-031413 CI-15-60 3/14/2013 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 86CI-15-60-080713 CI-15-60 8/7/2013 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 110CI-15-60-031314 CI-15-60 3/13/2014 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 72CI-15-60-092314 CI-15-60 9/23/2014 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 88CI-15-60-031815 CI-15-60 3/18/2015 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 93
DUP3-031815 CI-15-60 3/18/2015 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 79CI-15-60-092315 CI-15-60 9/23/2015 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 96CI-15-60-032416 CI-15-60 3/24/2016 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 99CI-15-60-092116 CI-15-60 9/21/2016 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 100CI-15-60-032917 CI-15-60 3/29/2017 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 63DUP-2-032917 CI-15-60 3/29/2017 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 < 0.40 65
CI-16-60-031513 CI-16-60 3/15/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-16-60-031214 CI-16-60 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-16-60-032316 CI-16-60 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20
2.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Intermediate Zone
Intermediate Zone
Not Sampled - Well InaccessibleNot Sampled - Well Inaccessible
Table 1Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
9 of 9 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Sample Identification Sample Location Date
Analytical Results (micrograms per liter)1
PCE TCEcis-1,2-
Dichloroethenetrans-1,2-
Dichloroethene Vinyl Chloride
CI-20-80-092415 CI-20-80 9/24/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-20-80-121815 CI-20-80 12/18/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-20-80-032316 CI-20-80 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-20-80-062816 CI-20-80 6/28/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-20-80-092116 CI-20-80 9/21/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-7-60-031313 CI-7-60 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-7-60-031214 CI-7-60 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-7-60-032216 CI-7-60 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-8-60-031815 CI-8-60 3/18/2015 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-8-60-032216 CI-8-60 3/22/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20CI-9-70-031313 CI-9-70 3/13/2013 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.28CI-9-70-031214 CI-9-70 3/12/2014 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.24CI-9-70-032316 CI-9-70 3/23/2016 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.25
2.9 2 0.7 2 NR 4 1,000 2 0.18 2
NOTES:PCE = tetrachloroethene
Shallow Zone = groundwater collected from 20 to 40 feet below ground surface
4NR denotes "not researched," which indicates that no regulatory standards or toxicity information are available for the constituent of concern to derive a cleanup level for the medium of potential concern.
Results in bold denote concentrations exceeding applicable cleanup levels.
3Groundwater cleanup levels protective of the air pathway for unrestricted land use (residential and commercial sites) and industrial land use were derived using the following equation: Gwcul = Aircul/GIVF.
1Analyzed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 8260B or 8260C.< denotes analyte not detected at or exceeding the laboratory reporting limit listed.
2 Preliminary Cleanup Level based on the letter regarding EPA's Partial Approval/Partial Disapproval of Washington's Human Health Water Quality Criteria and Implementation Tools dated November 15, 2016, prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Intermediate Zone = groundwater collected from 40 to 70 feet below ground surface
Preliminary Cleanup Levels-Intermediate Zone
TCE = trichloroetheneµg/l = micrograms per liter
Water Table Zone = groundwater collected from the first-encountered groundwater to 20 feet below ground surface
Intermediate Zone
Table 2Summary of Preliminary Cleanup Levels
Updated January 18, 2017West of 4th Site
Seattle, WashingtonFarallon PN: 457-010
4/27/2017P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
Table 11 of 1
Sediment
Puget Sound Background
Concentrations for Metals1
Soil Cleanup Level Protective of Direct
Contact Pathway (Unrestricted Land Use)2
Soil Cleanup Level Protective of Direct
Contact Pathway (Industrial Land Use)2
Soil Cleanup Level Protective of Air Quality based on
Protection of Groundwater as Potable Drinking
Water3
Soil Cleanup Level Protective of Groundwater
Concentrations Protective of Surface
Water Quality4
Groundwater Cleanup Level Protective of Air
Quality Water Table Zone (Unrestricted Land Use)5
Groundwater Cleanup Level Protective of Air
Quality Water Table Zone (Industrial Land Use)5
Groundwater Cleanup Level
Protective of Surface Water6
Groundwater Cleanup Level Protective of
Sediment7
Air Cleanup Level Protective of Inhalation
Pathway (Unrestricted Land Use)2
Air Cleanup Level Protective of Inhalation Pathway (Industrial Land Use)2
Surface Water Cleanup Level Protective of
Human Health8
Surface Water Cleanup Level Protective of
Aquatic Life Sediment Cleanup Level9
(Milligrams/kilogram)
Tetrachloroethene Carcinogen -- 476 21,000 0.08 0.04 116 482 2.9 36,000 9.6 40 2.9 -- 190Trichloroethene Carcinogen -- 12 1,750 0.03 0.006 6.9 37 0.7 4,760,000 0.37 2 0.7 194 12 8,950cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Non-Carcinogen -- 160 7,000 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Non-Carcinogen -- 1,600 70,000 0.59 6 559 1,224 1,000 -- 27.4 60 1,000 -- --1,1-Dichloroethene Non-Carcinogen -- 4,000 175,000 0.055 0.025 538 1,176 3.2 -- 91.4 200 3.2 -- --Vinyl chloride Carcinogen -- 0.67 87.5 0.002 0.001 1.3 12.7 0.18 543,000 0.28 2.8 0.18 210 13 2021,4-Dioxane Carcinogen -- 10 1,310 0.004 0.32 2,551 25,510 78 -- 0.5 5 78 -- --Arsenic Carcinogen 20 20 87.5 Not Applicable 0.082 Not Applicable Not Applicable 0.14 / 5 10 241 Not Applicable Not Applicable 0.14 / 5 10 36 14 7Barium Non-Carcinogen -- 16,000 700,000 Not Applicable 824 Not Applicable Not Applicable -- -- Not Applicable Not Applicable -- -- --Cadmium Non-Carcinogen 1 80 3,500 Not Applicable 1.2 Not Applicable Not Applicable 8.8 760 Not Applicable Not Applicable -- 8.8 15 5.1Copper Non-Carcinogen 36 3,200 140,000 Not Applicable 1.1 Not Applicable Not Applicable 3.1 11 18,000 Not Applicable Not Applicable -- 3.1 15 390Iron Non-Carcinogen 58,700 58,700 2,450,000 Not Applicable -- Not Applicable Not Applicable -- -- Not Applicable Not Applicable 1,000 -- --Manganese Non-Carcinogen 1,200 11,200 490,000 Not Applicable -- Not Applicable Not Applicable 100 -- Not Applicable Not Applicable 100 -- --Nickel Non-Carcinogen 48 1,600 70,000 Not Applicable 11 Not Applicable Not Applicable 8.2 2,200 Not Applicable Not Applicable 100 8.2 15 15.9Zinc Non-Carcinogen 85 24,000 1,050,000 Not Applicable 101 Not Applicable Not Applicable 81 6,600 Not Applicable Not Applicable 1,000 81 15 410
NOTES:Preliminary cleanup levels presented represent the most stringent cleanup levels for the constituent of concern listed in the media indicated. -- indicates no value is available. In the case of ARARs, the reference sources do not publish values for the noted chemicals. In the case of calculated values, one or more input parameters are not available.
1 Backgound metals values from Ecology Publication No. 94-115, Natural Background Soil Metals Concentrations in Washington State. Arsenic background from MTCA, Table 740-1 Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses.2 Cleanup level is based on standard Washington State Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation (MTCA) Method B (unrestricted land use) or Method C (industrial land use) values from the Cleanup and Risk Calculations tables (CLARC).
10 Arsenic Cleanup level of 5 ug/L based on background concentrations for state of Washington (MTCA Table 720-1).11 The surface water cleanup level for copper had previously been tabulated as 2.4ug/L; however this value is based on an approach using site-specific water effects ratio which has not been determined. We have replaced this with 3.1 ug/L, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria published by EPA under 304 of the Federal Clean Water Act - Aquatic Life Criteria Table.12 Oak Ridge Nation Laboratory (ORNL) Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Potential Contaminants of Concern for Effects on Aquatic Biota13 Peer Review Literature - DeRooij et al., 2004, Euro Chlor Risk Assessment for the Marine Environment OSPARCOM Region – North Sea – Environmental Monitoring and Assessment14 WAC- 173-201A-24015 National Recommended Water Quality Criteria published by EPA under 304 of the Federal Clean Water Act - Aquatic Life Criteria TableTable updated August 14, 2015 based on revisions to AWQC; July 20, 2016 based on Ecology comments on the Draft FS Reports for SU1 and SU2 (clarify footnotes, add sediment values, add surface water CULs protective of aquatic life); and January 17, 2017 based on EPA's revisions to the Clean Water Act Human Health criteria (dated 11/15/16).
(Micrograms/cubic meter)
7 Groundwater screening levels based on the transfer of contaminants from groundwater to sediment were calculated by dividing the sediment screening level by the associated partition coefficients. Koc and Kd values are from MTCA. Fraction of carbon assumed at 0.02 based on Lower Duwamish Waterway Feasibility Study (AECOM, 2012).8 The most stringent exposure pathway for human health receptors are for consumption of fish. Listed values are based on ARARs listed in CLARC except: (1) 1,4-dioxane is derived from MTCA Method B default values and values; (2) PCE, TCE, trans-DCE, vinyl chloride, nickel and zinc are based on EPA's revised CWA Human Health Criteria - Organism Only dated 11/15/16. 9 Sediment has not been confirmed to be affected by groundwater discharge to surface water. Sediment cleanup levels were derived from the Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site Record of Decisions (EPA, 2014), which does not contain values for nickel, TCE, PCE, or vinyl chloride. These constituents are not listed in the Sediment Managment Standards (WAC 173-204) either. EPA Region 3 BTAG
(Micrograms/liter)
"Not Applicable" is used where the constituent of concern will not affect the media of potential concern due to an incomplete pathway.
3 Soil cleanup levels for protection of air quality are calculated using MTCA Equation 747-1 where the potable Method B groundwater cleanup level was used as Cw. Concentrations of hazardous substances in soil that meet the potable groundwater protection standard currently are considered sufficiently protective of the air pathway for unrestricted and industrial land uses.4 Soil cleanup levels for protection of surface water quality are calculated using MTCA Equation 747-1 where the groundwater cleanup level protective of surface water in this table was used as Cw. 5 Groundwater cleanup levels protective of the air pathway for unrestricted land use (residential and commercial sites) and industrial land use were derived using the following equation: Gwcul = Aircul/GIVF. 6 Human health and marine aquatic ecologic receptors were considered. Refer to the Surface Water Cleanup Levels Protective of Human Health and Aquatic Life in this table. The more stringent value of the two receptors has been listed for the Groundwater Cleanup Level Protective of Surface Water.
Constituent of ConcernCarcinogen or Non-
Carcinogen
Preliminary Cleanup Levels
Soil Groundwater Air Surface Water
(Milligrams/kilogram) (Micrograms/liter)
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
1 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
3/15/2013 0.85 0.14 11 4,800 2.4 95 < 0.1 8.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.64 16.02 0.107 141.7 2.0
8/8/2013 0.41 < 0.050 13 3,500 1.6 84 < 0.1 6.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.89 17.56 0.173 67.1 2.4
3/13/2014 3.19 < 0.050 49 7,300 0.2 250 < 0.1 17 < 1.5 < 1.5 6.47 16.25 0.258 -20.4 3.1
9/24/2014 0.52 1.2 54 8,600 0.4 300 < 0.1 16 < 1.0 < 1.0 6.6 18.06 0.313 -27.2 3.7
3/18/2015 0.23 < 0.050 18 7,200 0.6 180 < 0.1 6.8 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.52 16.75 0.191 22.9 3.8
9/24/2015 0.46 < 0.050 26 5,900 4.2 190 < 0.1 15 < 1.0 0.57 5.70 18.88 0.203 IE 3.7
3/23/2016 2.89 < 0.050 13 3,800 2.0 130 < 0.1 94 < 2.2 0.56 6.46 16.19 0.152 -24.5 3.1
9/21/2016 1.68 < 0.050 35 6,200 4.0 240 < 0.1 14 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.44 18.6 0.2533 -67.1 3.4
3/14/2013 0.4 0.78 23 3,000 1 56 < 0.1 2.6 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.17 14.95 0.165 9.7 4.5
8/7/2013 0.41 1.1 45 3,200 1.2 120 < 0.1 9.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.30 18.88 0.47 176.2 5.9
3/13/2014 8.13 2.1 32 1,600 0.4 110 < 0.1 2.3 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.22 15.61 0.262 109.6 4.7
9/24/2014 0.38 0.74 39 2,400 0.5 420 < 0.1 17 1.7 < 1.0 6.40 19.31 0.291 -23 4.5
3/18/2015 8.77 0.23 37 1,500 < 0.2 140 < 0.1 5 0.61 < 0.50 6.21 15.14 0.276 50.6 4.6
9/22/2015 0.65 0.33 53 2,000 < 0.2 490 < 0.1 8.9 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.12 20.23 0.32 -26.8 4.4
3/24/2016 0.75 4.2 33 550 < 0.2 110 < 0.1 3.8 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.15 14.93 0.269 112.0 4.5
9/21/2016 0.28 1.1 43 4,400 < 0.2 610 < 0.1 27 1.5 < 0.50 6.22 19.6 0.3009 102.5 5.4
3/29/2017 3.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.16 14.3 0.232 187.6 NA
3/13/2013 0.6 NA NA NA 1.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.47 13.48 0.521 -15.7 NA
3/12/2014 5.18 NA NA NA 1.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.42 14.17 1.413 -40.2 NA
3/23/2016 0.31 NA NA NA 1.5 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.42 15.25 0.505 -115.4 NA
3/14/2013 0.96 0.06 120 4,800 1 120 < 0.1 73 8.5 < 6.0 6.23 15.15 0.438 35.4 3.3
3/11/2014 5.62 < 0.050 380 5,200 0.6 500 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 7.36 11.11 0.834 -7.1 2.2
3/17/2015 0.17 0.31 350 6,200 0.8 240 < 0.1 29 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.26 13.69 1.01 42.3 2.6
3/13/2013 0.66 NA NA NA 0.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.45 13.51 0.726 56.4 NA
8/6/2013 0.76 0.21 150 < 56 0.6 36 < 0.1 < 1.0 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.49 15.3 0.965 116.9 2.6
11/5/2014 1.31 2.9 170 820 NA 30 NA 0.74 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.65 17.53 0.718 40 2.9
9/23/2015 2.5 3 95 200 < 0.2 < 10 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.17 15.77 0.529 IE 2.4
9/20/2016 1.01 0.74 77 2,100 < 0.2 14 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.29 15.5 0.521 163.0 3.4
3/28/2017 1.01 NA NA NA < 0.2 NA NA NA NA NA 6.31 13.9 0.37 148.2 NA
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
CI-12-WT
CI-11-WT
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Water Table Zone
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
CI-10-WT
CI-13-WT
CG-137-WT
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
2 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/14/2013 1.15 8.5 47 500 0.4 120 < 0.1 < 1.0 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.96 16.53 0.42 90 3.5
8/6/2013 0.2 9.8 40 < 56 0.4 120 < 0.1 < 1.0 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.19 19.89 0.702 127.3 3.2
3/12/2014 5.34 0.33 33 1,700 1 200 < 0.1 81 10 < 5.0 6.29 16.45 0.287 47 5.3
9/24/2014 0.62 1.3 31 160 0.2 62 < 0.1 24 < 2.0 < 2.0 6.45 18.27 0.257 133 4.2
3/17/2015 0.72 0.074 23 540 0.4 93 < 0.1 77 1.4 < 0.50 6.17 15.72 0.235 90 4.6
9/22/2015 0.96 5.2 32 85 < 0.2 66 < 0.1 6.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.52 20.90 0.307 IE 3.8
3/23/2016 2.17 3.6 31 290 0.20 63 < 0.1 3.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.22 14.68 0.270 -7.7 4.3
9/20/2016 2.86 6.3 29 4,000 0.5 400 < 0.1 2.6 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.21 20.6 0.3137 1.6 4.7
3/28/2017 0.73 5.0 27 NA NA NA NA 2.4 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.08 14.2 0.272 157.4 4.5
3/15/2013 0.7 NA NA NA 1.8 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.51 16.09 0.547 -117 NA
3/12/2014 7.36 NA NA NA 1.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.39 13.47 0.497 -52.6 NA
3/23/2016 8.69 NA NA NA 2.3 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 5.71 14.85 0.564 -85.9 NA
3/13/2013 0.08 < 0.050 42 9,500 2 330 < 0.1 2400 < 250 < 250 6.77 13.09 2.62 18.2 2.7
8/6/2013 0.22 < 0.050 26 8,700 1.2 290 < 0.1 680 < 50 < 50 6.85 18.69 1.915 36.7 2.7
3/11/2014 1.88 3.5 110 3,600 1.8 190 < 0.1 190 < 25 < 25 6.65 12.32 1.394 0.2 2.4
11/5/2014 1.23 < 0.050 40 7,700 NA 320 NA 550 < 50 < 50 5.81 19.46 1.24 8 3
3/17/2015 0.82 0.29 97 13,000 2 730 < 0.1 690 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.39 14.51 3.727 -6.4 3.3
9/23/2015 0.69 0.11 48 12,000 4.6 340 < 0.1 260 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.50 18.11 2.691 IE 3.3
3/22/2016 7.33 < 0.050 86 4,300 1.75 310 < 0.1 270 < 250 < 0.68 6.58 13.27 1.835 -93.3 2.9
9/20/2016 0.43 2.0 < 5.0 35,000 2.0 460 < 0.1 7,700 < 66 < 5.4 6.81 16.7 0.980 -102.9 6.2
3/28/2017 0.16 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.68 12.3 1.594 -2.9 NA
3/13/2013 1.06 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.67 11.8 0.955 100.6 NA
3/11/2014 2.53 NA NA NA 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.56 12.82 0.561 31.2 NA
3/22/2016 3.34 NA NA NA < 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.05 12.62 0.584 -87.6 NA
3/28/2017 3.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.23 12.4 0.662 178.1 NA
3/14/2013 1.35 NA NA NA 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.66 11.46 7.24 -282 NA
3/11/2014 1.85 NA NA NA 0.1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.81 12.4 8.68 -242 NA
3/22/2016 0.19 NA NA NA 0.3 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.47 13.08 12.11 -280.6 NA
3/30/2017 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.77 13.0 10.593 -318.8 NA
Water Table Zone
CI-14-WT
CI-17-WT
CI-18-WT
CI-19-WT
CI-16-WT
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
3 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/13/2013 0.57 1.6 36 4,900 1 110 < 0.1 2.6 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.87 13.93 0.256 71.6 2.6
8/7/2013 0.36 0.52 30 1,900 0.8 100 < 0.1 4.3 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.42 17.88 0.406 128.2 3.2
3/12/2014 0.75 3.8 25 1,900 0.6 130 < 0.1 1.2 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.13 14.62 0.341 155.1 3.6
9/23/2014 0.38 11 39 4,500 0.4 180 < 0.1 0.82 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.19 19.9 0.473 13 4.5
3/17/2015 8.7 1.1 31 760 < 0.2 130 < 0.1 4.8 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.99 15 0.283 17.2 3.4
9/23/2015 1.22 2.5 33 420 < 0.2 120 < 0.1 9.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.07 18.16 0.303 9.4 2.7
3/23/2016 0.07 2.8 29 1,300 < 0.2 140 < 0.1 24 < 0.74 < 0.50 6.03 14.29 0.317 40.8 2.8
9/20/2016 0.40 4.5 32 6,300 0.5 180 < 0.1 49 < 1.5 < 0.50 6.14 18.2 0.3419 68.5 3.5
3/29/2017 0.29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.88 14.4 0.373 135.8 NA
3/19/2015 0.72 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.5 17.56 0.16 -3.3 NA
9/24/2015 IE NA NA NA 0.8 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 5.91 18.61 0.131 IE NA
3/23/2016 0.86 NA NA NA 3.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.27 17.29 0.242 -19.3 NA
9/22/2016 0.30 NA NA NA 1.5 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.41 18.4 0.2974 -27.5 NA
3/29/2017 2.49 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.32 16.7 0.369 35.3 NA
3/18/2015 1.17 < 0.050 30 13,000 < 0.2 270 < 0.1 48 1.3 < 0.50 5.97 15.3 0.31 7.6 6.4
3/23/2016 1.12 0.085 40 13,000 0.20 230 < 0.1 42 3.6 < 0.50 6.27 14.79 0.341 -65.3 5.7
3/29/2017 0.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.25 14.2 0.305 37.2 NA
3/13/2013 1.58 2.2 60 1,100 0.6 840 < 0.1 7.9 1.1 < 0.50 6.09 13.53 0.361 45.9 4.6
8/8/2013 0.18 1.4 84 340 1 610 < 0.1 7.1 1.7 < 0.50 6.46 19.03 0.79 107.1 5.5
3/13/2014 2.48 2.6 63 1,100 0.8 770 < 0.1 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.25 14.49 0.414 266.8 4.7
9/24/2014 0.31 0.72 99 140 0.2 450 < 0.1 41 4.1 < 2.5 6.4 19.53 0.546 11 6.7
3/17/2015 8.74 5.3 71 860 < 0.2 990 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.97 15.86 0.452 66.7 4.8
9/23/2015 0.24 0.51 71 280 < 0.2 570 < 0.1 6.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.25 18.94 0.473 7.1 6.1
3/24/2016 4.12 2.1 41 670 < 0.2 560 < 0.1 1.3 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.90 13.37 0.324 75.3 3.6
9/22/2016 0.40 0.66 86 520 0.5 970 < 0.1 5.4 0.59 < 0.50 6.28 18.7 0.579 180.7 6.3
3/18/2015 0.81 < 0.050 49 8,100 NA 540 NA 53 3 < 0.50 6.01 15.69 0.429 4.8 5.8
9/23/2015 1.41 < 0.050 54 7,700 5 480 < 0.1 29 < 2.0 < 0.50 6.05 18.67 0.392 -19.3 5.6
3/22/2016 2.20 < 0.050 35 5,700 2.0 510 < 0.1 96 5.2 < 0.50 6.28 15.12 0.395 33.7 5.7
9/21/2016 0.22 < 0.050 50 20,000 4.0 560 < 0.1 28 1.5 < 0.50 6.34 18.4 0.4337 -31.9 8.2
MW-3
MW-4
Water Table Zone
MW-5
CI-9-WT
MW-2
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
4 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/19/2015 0.67 NA NA NA 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 5.94 15.85 0.396 83.5 NA
3/22/2016 0.38 NA NA NA 1.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 5.98 16.05 0.295 85.2 NA
3/30/2017 0.56 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.12 16.2 0.370 136.3 NA
3/13/2013 2.06 0.92 21 3,300 2 44 < 0.1 2.8 1.2 < 0.50 6.13 13.21 0.128 25.5 2
8/8/2013 0.38 2.9 48 16,000 1.6 320 < 0.1 7.5 1.4 < 0.50 6.59 16.8 0.543 62.9 2.8
3/12/2014 1.38 8.2 51 7,300 1.2 240 < 0.1 21 3.8 < 1.5 6.16 14.55 0.369 141.4 2.4
9/23/2014 0.62 2.7 60 8,700 2.6 250 < 0.1 20 3.2 < 1.0 6.37 18.73 0.386 -73 3.1
3/17/2015 IE 1.1 46 8,700 < 0.2 250 < 0.1 59 8.7 < 0.50 5.90 15.11 0.317 81.1 3.7
9/23/2015 0.69 4.1 34 NA 3 NA < 0.1 220 30 < 0.50 6.15 18.52 0.366 -22 3.8
3/22/2016 2.94 2.1 36 8,000 1.0 68 < 0.1 9.2 0.99 < 0.50 5.92 13.81 0.260 74.4 2.8
9/20/2016 0.38 6.3 48 70,000 2.0 210 < 0.1 60 8.0 < 0.50 6.06 18.0 0.3833 17.8 7.3
3/29/2017 2.36 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.06 14.0 0.318 67.1 NA
3/14/2013 0.47 1 98 1,600 1 190 < 0.1 < 1.0 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.48 13.87 0.411 31.1 2.3
3/13/2014 2.25 2.3 74 3,300 1 210 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.90 14.22 0.462 255.5 2.6
9/23/2014 0.49 0.71 59 930 0.8 160 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.17 19.8 0.365 23 2.6
3/18/2015 1.94 2.5 90 570 < 0.2 110 < 0.1 < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.69 14.62 0.498 63 3.3
9/23/2015 0.67 0.51 71 970 NA 220 < 0.1 3.0 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.65 17.86 0.406 49.6 2.7
3/22/2016 0.61 3.4 88 490 < 0.2 150 < 0.1 1.4 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.89 14.08 0.503 66.1 3.2
9/20/2016 0.23 0.30 59 15,000 1.5 340 < 0.1 5.5 < 0.50 < 0.50 5.91 17.3 0.3953 68.4 4.0
3/14/2013 0.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.96 15.12 0.471 -92.2 NA
3/15/2013 0.34 < 0.050 < 5.0 7,600 2.8 560 < 0.1 1,600 < 250 < 250 7.15 15.64 0.35 -116.3 3.8
8/8/2013 0.36 < 0.050 < 5.0 9,500 3.2 570 < 0.1 2,500 < 500 < 500 6.72 15.92 0.607 39.2 4.2
3/13/2014 1.94 < 0.050 < 5.0 6,900 1.4 550 < 0.1 2,100 < 250 < 250 6.52 15.79 0.387 -38.7 3.9
9/24/2014 1.87 0.087 < 5.0 9,700 0.2 660 < 0.1 1,600 < 250 < 250 6.57 16.36 0.37 -40.8 4.4
3/18/2015 5.02 < 0.050 < 5.0 7,900 0.4 590 < 0.1 1,700 60 32 6.51 15.89 0.381 -16.6 4.5
9/24/2015 0.72 < 0.050 < 5.0 8,200 3.2 520 < 0.1 900 < 50 22 5.48 17.11 0.379 IE 4.2
3/23/2016 3.72 < 0.050 < 5.0 6,700 2.0 500 < 0.1 1,700 250 18 6.51 15.96 0.363 -48.1 4.6
9/22/2016 0.40 < 0.050 < 5.0 9,100 2.5 540 < 0.1 2,000 65 21 6.60 16.8 0.3844 -47.5 4.4
Water Table Zone
MW-8
Shallow Zone
CG-137-40
MW-6
MW-7
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
5 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/14/2013 6.76 < 0.050 63 23,000 3.2 930 < 0.1 10,000 < 500 300 6.00 15.81 0.462 -49 3.3
8/7/2013 0.64 < 0.050 67 21,000 2 870 < 0.1 8,900 < 500 < 500 6.64 14.16 0.68 99 3.4
3/13/2014 4.08 0.18 58 21,000 0.4 860 < 0.1 4,900 < 500 < 500 6.34 13.05 0.458 -50.5 3.7
9/23/2014 0.54 0.069 56 21,000 0.2 870 < 0.1 10,000 < 500 < 500 6.35 14.36 0.432 -47.6 3.8
3/18/2015 0.28 0.060 46 23,000 0.6 920 < 0.1 8,500 20 200 6.39 13.78 0.45 -25.2 3.8
9/23/2015 0.77 0.19 47 23,000 1.8 850 < 0.1 7,200 < 250 350 5.36 14.24 0.442 IE 4.3
3/24/2016 9.05 < 0.050 53 17,000 2.0 850 < 0.1 2,300 < 20 17 5.97 13.27 0.385 -29.4 3.8
9/21/2016 0.19 < 0.050 42 23,000 2.0 870 < 0.1 8,000 < 120 180 6.43 14.7 0.4484 -53.4 4.1
3/29/2017 0.07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.19 13.7 0.439 -54.6 NA
3/14/2013 0.69 NA NA NA 2.8 NA 0.1 NA NA NA 6.05 15 0.265 -32.4 NA
8/7/2013 0.22 NA NA NA 1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.56 17.89 0.461 33 NA
3/13/2014 2.6 NA NA NA 4.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.33 16.23 0.297 -33.5 NA
9/24/2014 0.92 NA NA NA 3 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.51 18.08 0.294 -114 NA
3/17/2015 9.61 NA NA NA 1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.12 16.22 0.286 -33 NA
9/22/2015 0.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.27 19.23 0.267 -67.8 NA
3/24/2016 0.65 NA NA NA 5.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.30 15.74 0.279 -17.8 NA
9/21/2016 0.46 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.40 18.3 0.2734 -54.0 NA
3/29/2017 0.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.34 15.5 0.292 -56.5 NA
3/13/2013 0.38 0.15 < 25 38,000 1.6 910 < 0.1 7,300 < 500 < 500 6.10 13.78 0.529 -55.3 5.0
8/6/2013 0.35 0.46 < 25 33,000 2 780 < 0.1 5,400 < 500 < 500 6.73 12.37 0.704 -35 5.2
3/12/2014 1.26 0.29 < 25 27,000 1.6 860 < 0.1 5,400 < 500 < 500 6.46 15.28 0.537 -70.6 5.5
9/23/2014 0.71 0.086 < 25 43,000 < 0.2 850 < 0.1 5,400 < 500 < 500 6.69 17.3 0.492 -95.8 5.0
3/19/2015 1.08 0.40 < 25 61,000 0.6 1100 < 0.1 6,600 < 10 < 3.0 6.33 15.2 0.585 -108.2 6.7
9/22/2015 0.80 < 0.050 < 25 36,000 2.0 810 < 0.1 5,300 < 250 < 0.50 5.84 18.7 0.465 270.6 5.1
3/23/2016 7.90 < 0.050 < 25 46,000 1.8 840 < 0.1 7,400 < 100 < 12 6.40 14.95 0.514 -124.3 5.3
9/21/2016 0.45 < 0.050 < 25 43,000 2.0 800 < 0.1 7,000 < 110 < 12 6.58 16.8 0.4732 -99.2 5.9
Shallow Zone
CI-11-30
CG-141-40
CI-10-35
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
6 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/14/2013 0.381 NA NA NA 1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.06 15.6 0.381 -34 NA
8/6/2013 0.43 NA NA NA 1.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.48 15.56 0.592 54.3 NA
3/11/2014 4.01 NA NA NA 2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.40 13.2 0.479 -2.8 NA
9/23/2014 1.24 NA NA NA 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.63 15.87 0.482 -35.2 NA
3/17/2015 0.13 0.11 42 19,000 2.2 470 < 0.1 240 2.2 < 0.50 6.16 14.32 0.419 8.6 4.6
9/22/2015 9.04 < 0.050 34 14,000 2.0 330 < 0.1 210 < 15 < 0.50 5.62 15.93 0.363 IE 4.9
3/22/2016 0.11 0.063 83 13,000 3.0 390 < 0.1 220 < 50 < 0.50 6.47 13.15 0.370 -225.6 4.3
9/20/2016 2.92 < 0.050 28 25,000 3.5 730 < 0.1 130 5 < 0.50 6.41 16.8 0.3254 -57.0 5.2
3/13/2013 0.28 NA NA NA 1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.62 13.91 0.698 55.5 NA
3/11/2014 3.01 NA NA NA 0.8 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.53 14.8 0.428 -10.9 NA
3/17/2015 4.11 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.26 14.91 0.41 37.5 NA
3/22/2016 8.07 NA NA NA < 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.35 14.66 0.366 -120.1 NA
3/28/2017 0.22 < 0.050 33 NA 2.5 NA NA 140 < 3.9 < 0.68 6.35 14.5 0.326 -23.8 5.0
3/14/2013 1.68 < 0.050 29 18,000 2 360 < 0.1 120 12 < 10 6.06 17.51 0.309 -40 3.2
8/6/2013 0.35 < 0.050 30 17,000 1.8 340 < 0.1 95 < 10 < 10 6.53 18.87 0.453 39.3 3.3
3/12/2014 7.11 < 0.050 39 18,000 0.8 370 < 0.1 93 12 < 5.0 6.37 16.01 0.32 -1.3 3.3
9/24/2014 0.7 0.055 31 19,000 0.4 350 < 0.1 47 5.8 < 5.0 6.53 17.29 0.289 -38.2 3.6
3/17/2015 2.22 0.15 32 23,000 0.4 400 < 0.1 120 7.9 < 0.50 6.31 15.22 0.315 -16.7 3.7
9/22/2015 1.33 0.47 31 18,000 1.6 360 < 0.1 56 7.9 < 0.50 5.19 18.58 0.299 IE 3.5
3/23/2016 0.48 1.1 31 19,000 3.0 390 < 0.1 110 9 < 0.50 6.36 15.32 0.315 -76.4 3.7
9/21/2016 0.71 < 0.050 28 21,000 2.0 350 < 0.1 74 8.7 < 0.50 6.41 16.7 0.285 -59.1 3.5
3/28/2017 0.64 < 0.050 31 NA 2.0 NA NA 120 18 < 0.57 6.32 14.6 0.292 -37.6 3.6
3/15/2013 0.79 NA NA NA 0.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.09 13.25 0.107 -351.7 NA
8/7/2013 0.61 NA NA NA 1.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.72 15.12 0.32 99.7 NA
3/13/2014 2.98 NA NA NA 0.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.33 12.7 0.351 -35.7 NA
9/23/2014 0.96 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.4 15.3 0.362 -26.1 NA
3/18/2015 1.74 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.21 13.93 0.422 -9.7 NA
9/23/2015 1.02 NA NA NA 0.80 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 5.65 15.20 0.400 IE NA
3/24/2016 0.10 NA NA NA 4.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.17 13.90 0.370 -36.9 NA
9/21/2016 0.87 NA NA NA 1.5 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.37 14.8 0.3775 -29.2 NA
CI-15-40
CI-14-35
CI-13-30
Shallow Zone
CI-12-30
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
7 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/15/2013 2.07 NA NA NA 1.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.69 17.13 0.535 -121 NA
3/12/2014 4.12 NA NA NA 1.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.44 14.07 0.778 -57.6 NA
3/23/2016 0.29 NA NA NA 2.5 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.35 14.76 0.614 -108.5 NA
3/13/2013 6.68 NA NA NA 1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.90 13.6 1.213 -70.5 NA
3/11/2014 6.68 NA NA NA 1 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.90 14.01 0.594 -112.9 NA
3/22/2016 4.37 NA NA NA 2.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.62 14.69 0.600 -135.3 NA
3/28/2017 0.14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.69 13.5 0.621 -148.6 NA
3/13/2013 0.18 < 0.050 63 4,100 1 120 < 0.1 1,600 < 250 < 250 6.63 13.28 0.856 71.3 2.4
8/6/2013 0.36 < 0.050 37 4,200 1.2 140 < 0.1 1,100 < 75 < 75 6.56 15.83 0.73 94.6 3.3
3/11/2014 0.81 0.056 12 4,600 0.8 160 < 0.1 4,200 < 500 < 500 6.51 13.4 0.426 -7.1 3.7
11/5/2014 1.44 0.23 40 5,500 < 0.2 140 < 0.1 4,600 < 500 < 500 4.97 17.19 0.453 78 3.5
3/17/2015 0.58 < 0.050 80 5,100 1.2 180 < 0.1 3,800 < 10 < 0.50 6.17 13.9 0.572 12.2 2.6
9/23/2015 0.77 0.30 68 3,200 3.8 160 < 0.1 1,300 < 50 < 0.50 5.88 15.68 0.537 IE 3.1
3/22/2016 0.26 < 0.050 85 2,600 1.5 140 < 0.1 59 < 5.0 < 0.50 6.25 13.54 0.569 -121.3 2.4
9/20/2016 1.79 < 0.050 59 51,000 2.5 450 < 0.1 5,100 < 68 < 4.9 6.47 15.7 0.558 22.5 4.0
3/28/2017 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.15 13.1 0.64 45.4 NA
3/14/2013 1.08 < 0.050 44 3,100 1.4 480 < 0.1 350 < 50 < 50 6.45 15.4 6.648 -201 5.5
8/6/2013 0.49 < 0.050 63 3,000 1.4 510 < 0.1 740 < 50 < 50 6.53 15.59 0.935 56 NA
3/11/2014 7.98 < 0.050 < 5.0 3,300 1.2 380 < 0.1 1,200 < 100 < 100 6.63 13.21 0.511 -92.2 4.6
9/23/2014 1.81 < 0.050 19 3,400 0.4 350 < 0.1 330 < 50 < 50 6.72 15.46 0.472 -94.8 5.2
3/18/2015 7.94 < 0.050 28 2,400 0.4 400 < 0.1 1,500 1.1 < 0.50 6.55 13.82 0.555 -27.1 6.0
9/22/2015 0.90 < 0.050 17 1,900 < 0.2 270 < 0.1 390 < 25 < 0.50 6.01 15.46 0.495 IE 5.8
3/22/2016 1.53 < 0.050 30 2,000 1.5 310 < 0.1 1,200 < 130 < 2.1 6.15 13.85 0.578 -177.8 6.6
9/20/2016 1.47 < 0.050 30 12,000 0.5 380 < 0.1 1,200 < 20 < 1.7 6.62 15.7 0.566 -35.4 6.4
3/30/2017 0.09 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.01 14.5 0.426 -277.6 NA
CI-18-30
CI-19-30
Shallow Zone
CI-16-30
CI-17-30
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
8 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/13/2013 0.24 NA NA NA 4.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.46 13.82 0.429 -49.9 NA
8/8/2013 0.82 NA NA NA 2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.77 17.42 0.789 42.5 NA
3/12/2014 0.31 NA NA NA 0.6 NA 0.2 NA NA NA 6.47 15.33 0.359 -7.4 NA
9/23/2014 0.93 NA NA NA 3 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.65 18.72 0.521 -112 NA
3/17/2015 9.47 NA NA NA < 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.28 15.6 0.412 -43.2 NA
9/23/2015 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.33 16.49 0.473 -71.8 NA
3/22/2016 IE NA NA NA 5.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.47 14.51 0.459 -50.4 NA
9/20/2016 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.64 16.4 0.4757 -75.0 NA
3/14/2013 0.28 0.095 < 25 19,000 3.6 960 < 0.1 3,600 380 < 250 6.23 14.13 0.526 -58.9 4.6
8/8/2013 0.28 0.10 < 15 18,000 1.2 910 < 0.1 5,500 < 500 < 500 6.78 15.68 0.91 25.4 5.4
3/13/2014 2.83 0.059 33 22,000 2.3 870 < 0.1 3,900 < 500 < 500 6.48 14.13 0.549 -61.4 5.0
9/23/2014 0.82 0.071 < 20 16,000 < 0.2 910 < 0.1 3,800 380 < 250 6.74 18.59 0.583 -134 5.1
3/18/2015 0.85 2.7 25 22,000 < 0.2 930 < 0.1 6,200 180 4.6 6.28 15.55 0.552 -58.8 5.2
9/24/2015 1.77 0.57 < 10 17,000 1.2 870 < 0.1 3,700 < 250 < 1.0 6.33 16.26 0.588 IE 5.1
3/22/2016 0.21 < 0.050 < 25 21,000 2.0 900 < 0.1 4,100 480 2 6.43 14.37 0.568 -56.2 5.7
9/20/2016 0.21 < 0.050 < 10 37,000 4.0 1,000 < 0.1 6,700 360 1.3 6.62 16.3 0.581 -73.1 4.9
3/13/2013 0.39 0.10 31 17,000 3.6 510 < 0.1 330 < 25 < 25 6.30 13.88 0.343 -44 3.1
8/7/2013 0.33 < 0.050 31 17,000 2.6 520 < 0.1 460 < 50 < 50 6.65 17.59 0.594 26 3.5
3/12/2014 1.2 < 0.050 < 5.0 12,000 2.6 430 < 0.1 230 < 15 < 15 6.44 14.56 0.325 -49.1 4.4
9/23/2014 0.67 0.091 < 10 13,000 1.6 430 < 0.1 630 < 50 < 50 6.64 18.98 0.329 -118 3.5
3/17/2015 8.88 0.072 12 11,000 1 400 < 0.1 630 6.2 < 0.50 6.24 15.5 0.29 -26.4 3.2
9/22/2015 0.58 < 0.050 < 5.0 9,100 2.0 330 < 0.1 570 < 50 < 0.50 6.24 16.89 0.242 -94.2 2.8
3/23/2016 0.85 < 0.050 15 12,000 3.5 390 < 0.1 590 < 13 < 1.2 6.34 14.58 0.294 -59.5 2.9
9/20/2016 0.29 < 0.050 5.6 15,000 3.5 390 < 0.1 990 < 9.1 < 1.6 6.60 17.4 0.278 -73.5 3.1
CI-7-40
CI-8-40
CI-9-40
Intermediate Zone
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
9 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/14/2013 3.58 < 0.050 19 690 0.6 110 < 0.1 180 < 10 < 10 6.04 13.75 0.283 159 3.3
8/7/2013 2.29 < 0.050 48 1,500 1.2 300 < 0.1 23 < 1.5 < 1.5 6.44 16.57 0.509 119.6 4.3
3/13/2014 8.24 0.17 14 190 0.4 27 < 0.1 8.6 < 0.50 < 0.50 6.26 11.74 0.281 17.5 3.0
9/23/2014 0.8 0.15 41 950 0.2 210 < 0.1 160 < 10 < 10 6.11 16.56 0.318 60.1 4.4
3/18/2015 0.31 0.15 27 4,700 0.4 810 < 0.1 3,600 15 190 6.57 13.61 0.495 -25.1 4.9
9/23/2015 0.66 < 0.050 42 1,100 1.2 330 < 0.1 60 < 3.0 0.59 5.82 16.70 0.334 IE 5.1
3/24/2016 0.62 0.077 28 5,500 2.0 860 < 0.1 3,700 < 73 290 6.50 13.78 0.496 -85.7 4.0
9/21/2016 0.18 < 0.050 25 4,900 1.5 820 < 0.1 2,900 < 75 180 6.79 14.9 0.497 -67.7 5.1
3/29/2017 0.22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.53 13.4 0.482 -67.4 NA
3/14/2013 0.23 NA NA NA 3.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.91 15.02 0.374 -86.6 NA
3/13/2014 0.13 NA NA NA 2.8 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.96 15.93 0.429 -99.5 NA
3/18/2015 0.85 < 0.050 < 5.0 3,000 < 0.2 390 < 0.1 4,900 8.3 1.6 6.42 15.54 0.428 -66.7 4.9
9/22/2015 0.19 < 0.050 < 5.0 3,100 3.0 360 < 0.1 4,300 < 250 < 0.50 6.94 17.16 0.415 -210 5.2
3/24/2016 0.09 < 0.050 < 5.0 3,200 2.5 380 < 0.1 6,700 < 100 < 7.8 6.97 15.00 0.418 -105.0 5.3
9/21/2016 0.21 < 0.050 < 5.0 4,400 2.0 420 < 0.1 9,100 < 110 < 7.3 7.12 17.3 0.427 -120.3 4.8
3/13/2013 0.31 0.080 < 5.0 8,200 1.2 610 < 0.1 12,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 6.57 13.72 0.528 -35.5 4.2
3/12/2014 1.18 0.083 < 5.0 8,000 1.4 620 < 0.1 8,000 < 500 < 500 6.74 15.58 0.727 -74.5 4.7
3/23/2016 0.20 < 0.050 < 5.0 6,700 1.5 480 < 0.1 13,000 < 330 < 22 6.84 14.80 0.774 -118.4 6.2
3/14/2013 0.96 < 0.050 < 5.0 1,300 1 170 < 0.1 3,600 < 250 < 250 7.22 15.66 0.432 -132 4.0
3/11/2014 1.65 0.074 < 5.0 750 1.2 180 < 0.1 1,500 < 100 < 100 7.46 13.57 0.436 -95.8 4.2
3/17/2015
3/22/2016
3/13/2013 0.8 NA NA NA 0.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.71 12.99 0.582 87.1 NA
3/11/2014 1.88 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.80 13.93 0.549 -107.5 NA
3/22/2016 0.21 NA NA NA 0.5 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.86 14.40 0.599 -174.2 NA
3/28/2017 0.39 < 0.050 < 5.0 NA 2.0 NA NA 15,000 < 280 < 34 7.78 14.0 0.573 -113.6 9.5
CI-11-60
CI-12-60
CI-13-60
CG-141-50
CI-10-65
Intermediate Zone
Not Sampled - Well Inaccessible
Not Sampled - Well Inaccessible
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
10 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/14/2013 NA < 0.050 < 5.0 3,900 2.8 770 < 0.1 3,800 < 250 150 NA NA NA NA 3.7
8/8/2013 0.31 0.10 < 5.0 4,400 2.2 720 < 0.1 4,100 < 500 < 500 7.26 18.35 0.835 -9.7 4.0
3/13/2014 2.51 0.48 < 5.0 3,300 0.8 740 < 0.1 3,100 < 500 < 500 7.06 16.01 0.56 -85.9 4.1
9/24/2014 0.71 0.061 < 5.0 3,700 0.6 790 < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.29 16.96 0.525 -95.2 4.4
3/19/2015 8.57 < 0.050 < 5.0 3,200 0.2 840 < 0.1 3,600 38 210 6.90 16.2 0.569 -87.7 4.5
9/24/2015 8.25 0.055 < 5.0 3,500 3.0 770 < 0.1 3,500 < 250 270 6.85 19.22 0.564 IE 4.4
3/23/2016 0.24 < 0.050 < 5.0 5,200 2.0 830 < 0.1 5,000 < 140 190 6.98 15.04 0.560 -91.8 5.0
9/21/2016 0.20 < 0.050 < 5.0 7,000 4.0 810 < 0.1 5,600 < 79 170 7.05 17.3 0.553 -119.3 4.6
3/15/2013 3.35 NA NA NA 2.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.07 16.75 0.443 -127 NA
3/23/2016 0.30 NA NA NA < 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.98 14.98 0.465 -127.2 NA
3/28/2017 0.21 < 0.050 < 5.0 NA 2.0 NA NA 4,400 < 110 < 17 6.73 14.0 0.452 -111.8 5.7
3/14/2013 1.47 0.34 < 5.0 7,100 1.6 690 < 0.1 2,900 < 250 210 6.56 15.61 0.478 -60 4.2
8/7/2013 0.29 < 0.050 < 5.0 7,200 1.6 690 < 0.1 3,500 < 500 < 500 6.91 15.55 0.741 22.4 4.7
3/13/2014 4.9 < 0.050 < 5.0 6,300 0.2 710 < 0.1 730 < 50 66 6.65 12.99 0.489 -60.2 5.2
9/23/2014 0.57 0.57 < 5.0 7,600 < 0.2 720 < 0.1 3,400 < 250 260 6.58 15.12 0.46 -58.7 4.7
3/18/2015 0.4 < 0.050 < 5.0 7,100 0.4 770 < 0.1 5,200 44 260 6.62 14.3 0.495 -48.2 5.4
9/23/2015 0.80 0.36 < 5.0 7,700 1.6 730 < 0.1 3,600 < 250 370 6.20 15.01 0.485 IE 4.7
3/24/2016 1.44 < 0.050 < 5.0 7,100 1.2 720 < 0.1 3,500 < 89 330 6.63 13.98 0.498 -89.3 5.2
9/21/2016 1.05 < 0.050 6.1 8,400 1.0 660 < 0.1 3,100 < 120 150 6.71 15.2 0.490 -57.7 5.4
3/29/2017 0.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.61 14.5 0.48 -77.3 NA
3/15/2013 0.78 NA NA NA 1.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.78 17.92 0.756 -126 NA
3/12/2014 0.8 NA NA NA 1.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.68 14.14 0.786 -45.8 NA
3/23/2016 4.11 NA NA NA 2.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.74 14.28 0.837 -161.4 NA
9/24/2015 6.93 NA NA NA 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.22 17.07 0.465 IE NA
12/18/2015 0.84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.81 13.41 0.496 -204.1 NA
3/23/2016 1.02 NA NA NA 1.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.29 14.30 0.503 -134.7 NA
6/28/2016 .76 NA NA NA 0.25 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.61 18.36 0.485 -129 NA
9/21/2016 0.67 NA NA NA 0.5 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 7.39 17.4 0.4915 -98.2 NA
CI-16-60
CI-20-80
CG-137-50
CI-15-60
CI-14-70
Intermediate Zone
Table 3Summary of Natural Attenuation and Water Quality Parameters
Site Unit 2Seattle, Washington
Farallon PN: 457-010
P:\457 Capital Indust\457009 West of 4th - W4 PLP Group\Reports\Pilot Study WP\Tables\457-009 Pilot Study WP tables
11 of 11 DRAFT -- Issued for Regulatory Review
Available Organic Carbon
Sample Location Sample Date
Dissolved Oxygen 1 (mg/l)
Nitrate2
(mg/l)Sulfate3
(mg/l)Total Iron4
(µg/l)
Total Manganese4
(µg/l)Ethane6
(µg/l)Ethene6
(µg/l)
Water Quality Parameters 1Metabolic ByproductsTotal and Dissolved MetalsElectron Receptors
Ferrous Iron5
(mg/l)Temperature
(°Celsius)Conductivity
(mS/cm)ORP (mV)
TOC7
(mg/l)pH
Manganese (II)5
(mg/l)Methane6
(µg/l)
3/13/2013 0.58 0.58 < 5.0 8,300 5 680 < 0.1 6200 1400 1500 6.59 13.71 0.516 -58 3.7
3/12/2014 0.62 < 0.050 < 5.0 8,600 1.6 700 0.1 4000 < 500 < 500 6.69 14.65 0.595 -56 4.2
3/22/2016 1.14 < 0.050 < 5.0 8,700 2.0 670 < 0.1 4800 < 250 1 6.63 14.12 0.568 -65.6 4.8
3/18/2015 0.94 NA NA NA < 0.2 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.76 14.95 0.507 -88.2 NA
3/22/2016 0.23 NA NA NA 2.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.97 14.27 0.506 -89.1 NA
3/13/2013 0.3 NA NA NA 3.6 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.53 14.08 0.443 -60.3 NA
3/12/2014 3.75 NA NA NA 0.4 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.60 14.25 0.514 -71.1 NA
3/23/2016 0.12 NA NA NA 2.0 NA < 0.1 NA NA NA 6.42 14.33 0.513 -73.5 NANOTES:< denotes analyte not detected at or exceeding the reporting limit listed. electron receptors = compounds that gain electrons and are sources of energy during biodegradation1Collected using a Yellow Springs Instrument multimeter with flow-through cell. ° = degrees2Analyzed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 353.2. IE = instrument error3Analyzed by American Society for Testing and Materials Method D516-02 or ASTM Method D516-07. mg/l = milligrams per liter; equivalent to parts per million4Analyzed by EPA Method 6010C. mS/cm = milliSiemens per centimeter specific conductance units5Measured in the field using conventional chemistry parameters by EPA/American Public Health Association Methods. mV = millivolt units for measurement of oxidation-reduction potential (ORP)6Analyzed by EPA Method RSK-175. metabolic byproducts = compounds that result from biodegradation processes7Analyzed by Standard Method 5310B. TOC = total organic carbon µg/l = micrograms per liter
NA= not analyzed
CI-9-70
CI-7-60
CI-8-60
Intermediate Zone