Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser
Assembly of XFEL Cryomodules: Lessons and Results
1
S. Berry, CEA-Saclay, Irfu/SACM
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserOutline
Cryomodule production• Delivery and throughput• Quality control
Module performance vs. Clean Room proceduresModule repair activitiesConclusions
22016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserE-XFEL Cold Linac 17.5 GeV
1 + 100 accelerator modules
808 accelerating cavities1.3 GHz / 23.6 MV/m / 1010
25 RF stations 5.2 MW each
32016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser
CEA deliverable to European XFEL:
assembly of 103 accelerator modules
on the Saclay site and with CEA* infrastructure* nine pumping systems (with mass-spectrometer) and one laser-tracker from DESY
* two tuner control racks from INFN
Workforce by an industrial contractor Alsyom:
Quantity production goal: 1 module / week
Quality performance goal: Eacc > 23,6 MV/m
Cryomodule Production
42016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser
the XFEL Village
Module integration route
Coupler Area CO-WS1
Alignment Area AL-WS1 & 2
Shipment Area
SH-WS1 & CO-WS2
Roll-out Area
RO-WS1 & 2Warehouse
Clean room Area
CC-WS1 & 2SA-WS1 & 2
Cantilever Area CA-WS1
Assembly Hall : Workstations
52016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserComponent Industrialization / Handover
Cryo-systems
Vacuum vessels
45 from Zanon, 58 from IHEP/DESY
Tuners / DESY
800 Cavities / DESY400 Zanon / 400 RI
Helium tanks / DESY600 Zanon / 200 CNC / DESY
Current leads / DESY
Couplers / IN2P3650 Thales-RI150 CPI
Quadrupole-BPM / DESY103 Magnets / CiematBPM / 72 DESY – 31 CEA206 Gate Valves / DESY
Magnetic Shields / CEA
Bellows / BINP
6
There are 9 422 individual components integrated
and over 12 400 individual parts manipulated
per cryomodule
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserCryomodule Delivery
7
2016:25 modules
Figure: delivery of cryomodules, from XM-3 to XM100
• 103 modules delivered to DESY (incling XM-3, XM-2, XM-1).
• In 2015, one cryomodule was delivered every 4 days, 52 in total.
• The Cold Linac includes also two pre-series cryomodules: XM-2 and XM-1
• The shipment of XM100 was on 27 July 2016
2015:52 modules
2014:24 modules
XM-3 XM-2
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser
54
XM 4
L2L1
8
XM 5 XM 1 XM 2 XM -1
L3
L3
L3
L3
L3
Installation Progress XTL
Status: 16.09.2016
L001A2.1.L1 BC1
L2
L3
L3
BC2
XM 7 XM 6 XM11 XM 3 XM 13 XM 9 XM 10 XM 19
L002A2.2.L1
L003A2.3.L1
L004A2.4.L1
L005A3.1.L2
L006A3.2.L2
L007A3.3.L2
L008A3.4.L2
L009A4.1.L2
L010A4.2.L2
L011A4.3.L2
L012A4.4.L2
L013A5.1.L2
L014A5.2.L2
L015A5.3.L2
L016A5.4.L2
L017A6.1.L3
L018A6.2.L3
L019A6.3.L3
L020A6.4.L3
L021A7.1.L3
L022A7.2.L3
L023A7.3.L3
L024A7.4.L3
L025A8.1.L3
L026A8.2.L3
L027A8.3.L3
L028A8.4.L3
L029A9.1.L3
L030A9.2.L3
L031A9.3.L3
L032A9.4.L3
L033A10.1.L3
L034A10.2.L3
L035A10.3.L3
L036A10.4.L
3
L037A11.1.L3
L039A11.3.L3
L040A11.4.L
3
L041A12.1.L3
L042A12.2.L3
L043A12.3.L3
L044A12.4.L3
L045A13.1.L3
L046A13.2.L3
L047A13.3.L3
L048A13.4.L
3
L049A14.1.L3
L050A14.2.L3
L051A14.3.L3
L052A14.4.L
3
L053A15.1.L3
L054A15.2.L3
L055A15.3.L3
L056A15.4.L3
L057A16.1.L3
L058A16.2.L3
L059A16.3.L3
L060A16.4.L
3
L061A17.1.L3
L062A17.2.L3
L063A17.3.L3
L064A17.4.L
3
L065A18.1.L3
L066A18.2.L3
L067A18.3.L3
L068A18.4.L
3
L069A19.1.L3
L070A19.2.L3
L071A19.3.L3
L072A19.4.L
3
L077A21.1.L3
L078A21.2.L3
L079A21.3.L3
L080A21.4.L
3
L089A24.1.L3
L090A24.2.L3
L091A24.3.L3
L092A24.4.L
3
L081A22.1.L3
L082A22.2.L3
L083A22.3.L3
L084A22.4.L
3
L093A25.1.L3
L094A25.2.L3
L095A25.3.L3
L096A25.4.L
3
L073A20.1.L3
L074A20.2.L3
L075A20.3.L3
L076A20.4.L
3
L085A23.1.L3
L086A23.2.L3
L087A23.3.L3
L088A23.4.L
3
L097A26.1.L3
L098A26.2.L3
L099A26.3.L3
L100A26.4.L
3
L038A11.2.L3
XM 18
DEMACO Cryo-connection
1.508 m
XM 27 XM 20
A2
A6
XM 30A7 A8
XM 31 XM 28 XM 14XM 34
P
XM 26 XM 35XM 37
SCB 1
DEMACO Cryo-connection
XM 38 SCB 2XM 39 XM 40 XM 41 XM 36
XM 43 XM42
96 Modules installed 1 RF-Station ready23 RF-Station in preperation
XM47XM44
P P
XM 49XM 16 XM 33XM 45XM 15
A9 A10
52 53 55 56 57 58 59 6160 62 63
XM 51XM 17
XM55
XM 52XM 53XM 25
A11
A12 A13 A14
XM 32
XM 67
P
XM 56
P
P
XM 48XM 23 XM 58
XM59
XM 12
P
P P
SCB 4
XM65
6867 70 747372 75696664 76
XM 64 XM 60
SCB 3
XM 57
XM 71
UV XTL-2AV
XM 63 XM 66
51
XM 21
XM 61
XM 69XM 68 XM 70
A5
A15 A16 A17
XM 72XM 73
XM 76XM 62
A4
A3
P
PP P
CS1 CS2
CS2
CS3
CS4
CS5
CS6
CS7
CS8
CS9
65
32
797877 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
XM -2XM 74XM 77 SCB 5XM 79
P PP
XM 81XM 80XM 78 XM 75
90 91 93 94 100
BC0DoglegInjectorDEMACO Cryo-connection
95 96 97 98 99 102101
P
SCB 6
P
XM83 XM82XM 22 XM84XM 86XM87XM 85
<<< Cabling >>>
22 24 25 26 28
P29 30 31 33 34 35 36 37
71
92
A18 xx xA19 A20
XM 89XM 88XM 90XM 92XM 54
<<< Rack cabling >>>
P P P
x x xA22 A23
103
XM 95XM 94XM 93
104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114
118
XM 91 XM 24XM 97XM 96 LastXM98
P P PA21
A24
23
116 120 126
x x A25
<< cabling >>
Wave Guide assembling
117 119 121 122 123 125 127
Wave Guide assembling
Wave Guide assembling
Interlock-door 1.102m
115
124 128
parked
End cap
129
133 137
Mobil Cleaning Room
Mobil Cleaning Room
Wave Guide assembling
<< Cleaning CS7 Racks + Floor >>
Wave Guide assembling
Connecting Power cable to Station
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser2016-08-18
92016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserProduction Throughput
10
• 5 days throughput was reached mid-October 2014 with XM15the design of the Assembly Infrastructure was sound
• 4-day throughput was reached in January 2015 with XM25
Courtesy
July 2016: XM100
March 2014: XM1
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserImproving Integration Processes
11
Acceleration and Quality of Production benefited mostly from:• New clean room assembly procedure: moving individual cavity venting
after the leak check of the cold coupler assembly, rather than later, before the string assembly. This eliminates one connection to pumping stations for cavity venting, and one valve closing-opening cycle.
• New equipment, e.g. string leak test plexi-box:
• Pure Argon gas for Titanium welding, instead of He-Ar (50%-50%),to avoid the long and unpredictable time to pump and purge the LHetank to reach the He background for the leak test (LT) by externalaccumulation.
• Reducing the impact of non-conformities, particularly imported NC.More human resources have been put on incoming inspection and QC.
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserQuality Control: Non Conformities
Non Conformities recorded by Alsyom fall into 3 categories:1) Tooling and equipment (TOOLING), responsibility by CEA/DESY2) Accelerator components (PRODUCT), responsiblity by suppliers3) Assembly operations (PROCESS), responsibility Alsyom
The number of PRODUCT Non-Conformities has not gone down. But, with better and more efficient detection at incoming inspection, the impact of PRODUCT NC on the module assembly has considerablydecreased, compared to when many NC were discovered ‘on the fly’.
122016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserQuality Control
13
Ask for torque specification from the begining
Alsyom QC ,
CEA QC ,The Quality Control
of QC is needed !
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserCryomodule Performance at AMTF
• AMTF average gradient is 18% above specs : Eacc = 27.8 MV/m.• All but 7 of 103 tested modules are on XFEL specs (23.6 MV/m):
• XM33, XM58 XM68 XM98 and XM99 are limited by individual cavityperformance
• XM45 was impacted by a clean room power outage• XM46 was impacted by beam vacuum leaks
14
Average operating gradient per cryomodule, clipping the VT results to 31 MV/m
111315171921232527293133
XM-3
XM-1
XM2
XM4
XM6
XM8
XM10
XM12
XM14
XM16
XM18
XM20
XM22
XM24
XM27
XM29
XM31
XM33
XM35
XM36
XM38
XM40
XM42
XM44
XM46
XM48
XM50
XM52
XM54
XM56
XM58
XM60
XM62
XM64
XM66
XM68
XM70
XM72
XM74
XM76
XM78
XM80
XM82
XM84
XM86
XM88
XM90
XM92
XM94
XM96
XM98
XM10
0
Average RF gradient (MV/m) for taylored RF distribution/individual cavities
spec
Eacc VT
Eacc AMTF
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserXM71 Performance
Cavities 2,4, 6 and 8 have higher field emissionin VT (@quench limit gradient) than in AMTF (@ 31 MV/m power limit).
15
Cavity field emissionQuench Limit
Operating Gradient
MT @ 31 MV/m
VT @ 34-38 MV/m
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserCryomodule Performance : XM46
16
XM46 string was leaky in the clean room AND before shipment. Bothleaks have been repaired at Saclay but they generated 2 extra connections of the beam vacuum to pumping groups, and 2 additional venting-pumping
Eacc = 19,7 MV/m
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserAbout Gradient Comparison
• Accelerating gradients are the most scrutinized module performance parameters, although heat loads, alignment and PED certification are entering the acceptance criteria.
• The absolute gradient is the result of the whole production chain, from the Nb sheet to the module test (MT). It is mostly determined bycavity manufacturing and module assembly.
• The quality of module assembly shows in the gradient differencebetween cavity acceptance (VT) and module acceptance (MT).
• The VT vs. MT comparison of both the ‘maximum’ and the ‘operational’ gradients is impaired by a systematic error:
1. Maximum gradients depend on 1) RF duty cycle, 2) cooling conditions and, 3) magnetic environment, which are completely different from VT to MT
mostly cavity-independent error2. Operational gradients depend, in addition, on X-Ray measurement
devices which are different from VT to MT (although cross-calibrated)mostly cavity-independent error
3. Finally, Q0 is not measured in MT: therefore the MT usable gradient couldcorrespond to lower or higher Q0 values cavity-dependent error
172016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserCryomodule Performance: VT vs. MT
• Significant gradient degradation from XM6 to XM23, while CEA and Alsyom put all their effort in achieving production goal of 1 CM/week: an audit of string and module assembly wasconducted by CEA on XM26
• A simplification of the clean room procedures was introduced at XM54: no degradation after
18
1st sample of 34 series CMEop = -2.1 MV/m
2nd sample of 19 series CMEop = -1.7 (-0.9) MV/m
last 48 series CMEop =+0.4 MV/m
CEA AuditNew clean
room procedure
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserXM26 Clean Room Assembly Audit
Audit Findings:• Operators walk too fast in the clean room.• Record the cleanliness level (< 10 particles / min) reached on the
angle valve before the pump connections to the cavity (CC and SA).• Two operators are requested to connect cavity to the pumping
system (CC and SA).• Two operators are requested to position inter-cavity bellows and
screw first 4 studs (SA).• Careful pre-alignment of parts (coupler and cavity flanges at CC,
inter-cavity bellow/cavity-coupler-side flange at SA) is requested for easy and clean assembly.
• Improvement of operator positions versus critical RF surfaces (avoid top assembly, request seated).
• Gate valve connection to pumping system procedure has been reviewed to ensure better cleanliness (CC).
192016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserSA-WS: pre-alignement of bellows
Observation during XM26 assembly
202016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserClean Procedures: Comparison
21
Procedure n°1 n°2 n°3 n°4
# Gate valve to pipe connections 34 22 14 14
# Gate valve open/close cycles 33 21 13 13
# N2 blowing after an opening 17 17 9 9
# Leak checks 52 40 32 23
Number of vacuum operations for a complete cryomodule assembly
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserCryomodule Performance: n°1-2 vs. n°3-4
22
Procedures n°3 and n°448 cryomodulesEop = +0.4 MV/m
Procedures n°1 and n°2:54 cryomodulesEop = -2.0 MV/m
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserConclusions for Cryomodule Assembly
• E-XFEL Cryomodule Assembly at Saclay implied 4 main overlappingphases:
1. Mastery of assembly procedures [ T1/2008 – T1/2013 ], with XM-32. Mastery of infrastructure and tooling [ T3/2010 – T1/2013 ], at XM-13. Mastery of non-conformities handling, both imported-PRODUCT and
PROCESS-generated non-conformities [ T3/2012 – T3/2014 ], at XM154. ‘Mastery’ of the industrial operator
• Productivity [ T1/2014 – T4/2014 ], at XM25• Quality Assurance [ T4/2014 – ongoing ]
This process depends on the early availability of the cryomodule components: ‘Practice makes perfect’
• The difficulties and the risks of coupler assembly had been under-estimated by CEA, especially for the coupler warm part
• Better module RF performance is correlated to Clean Room practice and Clean Room procedures.
• The goal of ‘zero mistake’ has been missed: the rate of ~ 1 major mistake every 2 weeks is an organisational problem.
232016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron LaserConclusions (2/2)
• E-XFEL Cavity production demonstrates the existence of EU vendorsfor cavities in the range 30 – 40 MV/m.
• E-XFEL AMTF demonstrates that RF testing is feasible) at a rate compatible with one ILC hub, even if 100% MT is the chosen option: 11-day cycle per module, with 3 MT bunkers in AMTF
• E-XFEL Cryomodule Assembly demonstrates that a 3-day throughputis feasible for ILC production, leading to about 120 modules per yearon one production site.
• When all assembly equipments are operating under nominal conditions, there are clear indications that RF performance of the cryomodules is impaired by:
• The invasiveness of operators in the clean room• The invasiveness of vacuum operations on the beam vacuum. Both
can be mitigated with good quality control and floor inspections• Clean room assembly can be further improved, qualitatively and
quantitatively, e.g. by unifying cold coupler and string assembly in a unique workstation (2 shifts required to achieve 3-day throughput).
242016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser
Thanks to my co-workpackage leaders:
WP03 K Jensch and O. Napoly, WP09 A. Matheisen
Thanks to the CEA team:
C. Cloué, C. Madec, S. Régnaud, C. Simon
C. Boulch, P. Charon, J-P. Charrier, M. Fontaine, Y. Gasser, G. Monnereau,
J-L. Perrin, T. Trublet, B. Visentin
Thanks to ALSYOM
P. Pluvy, J. Dumas, C. Abdi, F. Déau, F. Chatillon,
M. Jurado and their team, G. Guillonneau (SEIV)
Thanks to DESY and LAL colleagues
S. Barbanotti, M. Schmöckel, H. Hintz, F. Hoffmann, W. Kaabi, D. Käfer,
R. Klos, L. Lilje, W. Maschmann, M. Schlösser, A. Verguet, and many others
Acknowlegments for Module Integration
25
the last of the cavities
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU
XFELX-Ray Free-Elect ron Laser
26
Thank you for your attention
2016 September 28th LINAC16, MSU