44
Assessing Mobile Touch Interfaces for Tetraplegics Tiago Guerreiro Hugo Nicolau Joaquim Jorge Daniel Gonçalves

Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Assessing Mobile Touch Interfaces

for Tetraplegics

Tiago Guerreiro

Hugo NicolauJoaquim Jorge

Daniel Gonçalves

Page 2: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Mobile evolution …

Page 3: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Touch Interfaces

…Le a d in g t o

Page 4: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

pleasant

Page 5: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Tactile feedback

loss of tactile feedback

Page 6: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Loss of physical stability

Page 7: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

hard to select targets

Page 8: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

it occurs to everyone

Page 9: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

… and motor impaired

Page 10: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

require less strength

Page 11: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Adapt to users’ needs

Page 12: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Wobbrock, EdgeWrite, 2003

Froehlich, Barrier Pointing, 2007

Page 13: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Provide the knowledge to build better touch interfaces

Page 14: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…We p e r f o rm e d

Page 15: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…Te s t e d s e v e r a l

InteractionTechniques

Page 16: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…S c r e e n a r e a s

… c o r n e r s

Page 17: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…S c r e e n a r e a s

… e d g e s

Page 18: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…S c r e e n a r e a s

… m id d le a r e a s

Page 19: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7 mm

… a n d t a r g e t s iz e s

12 mm 17 mm

Page 20: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta p p in g

Page 21: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

C r o s s in g

Page 22: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

E x it in g

Page 23: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

G e s t u r in g

Page 24: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

15 participants28-64 years old

C4-C7 lesion level6 left-handed

never used touchscreens

Page 25: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…F o c u s o n

Tapping

Page 26: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta r g e t S iz e

0H Targe t s iz e has no influe nce on task e rrors

Page 27: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta r g e t S iz e

Page 28: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ta r g e t S iz e

0H Targe t s iz e has no influe nce on task e rrors

[F=25.110 p<.001]

Page 29: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

C o r n e r Ta r g e t s

H0Task errors are not dependent on the target’s position (corner vs center)

Page 30: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm35%

35%

27%

27%

22%

22%

4 5 % 2 4 % 2 0 %

35%

35%

27%

27%

22%

22%

C o r n e r Ta r g e t s

Page 31: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

C o r n e r Ta r g e t s

0H Task errors are not dependent on the target’s position (corner vs center)

[p>.05]

Page 32: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

E d g e Ta r g e t s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (e dge v s ce nte r)

Page 33: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

4 5 % 2 3 % 2 2 %

45%

4 0 % 45%

23%

2 6 % 23%

22%

19 % 22%

4 5 % 2 3 % 2 2 %

E d g e Ta r g e t s

Page 34: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

E d g e Ta r g e t s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (e dge v s ce nte r)

[p>.05]

Page 35: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

E d g e Ta r g e t s

5 3 % 2 7 % 2 0 %

6 1% 3 3 %

28%

11% 2 4 %

22%

11% 11%

22%

3 7 % 3 0 % 13 %

4 4 % 3 3 % 3 1%

37%

4 4 % 4 1%

4 1% 2 7 % 7

%52%

2 3 % 1 8%

5 3 % 11% 7 %

Left

Right

Page 36: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ve r t ic a l A r e a s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (top v s bottom v s ce nte r)

Page 37: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

45% 28% 27%

39% 28% 24%

43% 19% 12%

7mm 12mm 17mm

Ve r t ic a l A r e a s

Page 38: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Ve r t ic a l A r e a s

0H Task e rrors are not de pe nde nt on the targe t’s pos ition (top v s bottom v s ce nte r)

Largest [p<.05]Medium [p<.01]

Page 39: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

. . .S u g g e s t io n s f o r

Tapping

Page 40: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…R e g a r d in g t a r g e t s iz e

12 mm

Page 41: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

, …H o w e v e r e r r o r r a t e s a r e s t i l l

High

Page 42: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

…R e g a r d in g t a r g e t p o s it io n

Support

Page 43: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

Remaining interaction techniques

Differences between able-bodied and tetraplegics

F u t u r e Wo r k

Page 44: Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

The EndHugo [email protected]