Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    1/44

    Great Valley Cente r

    201 Needham Street , Modesto , CA

    Tel : 2 0 9 /522 - 5 103 Fax : 2 0 9 /522 - 5 116

    www.greatvalley .org info @greatvalley .org

    Supporting the economic, social, and environmental

    well-being of Californias Great Central Valley

    As s e s s i n g t h e Re g i o n Vi A i n d i c A t o R s

    Education and Youth Preparedness

    (Second Edition)

    The State of the

    Great central valleyof California

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    2/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    3/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    4/44

    2

    th e s tAte o f t h e g ReAt ce n t R A l VA l l e y

    ed u c A t i o n A n d yo u t h PR e P A R e d n e s s

    Assessing the Region Via Indicators(Second Edition)

    W h a t a r e I n d i c a t o r s ?

    Indicators are powerul tools or monitoring and

    tracking overall quality o lie and or comparing

    perormance against goals or benchmarks. They

    help communities monitor conditions by providing

    a baseline against which uture changes can be

    measured. Indicators help to answer important

    questions such as how well the economy is

    unctioning, how the schools are doing, or whether

    air and water quality are improving or worsening.

    W h a t a r e G o o d I n d i c a t o r s ?

    A good indicator has several characteristics:

    It addresses the undamental part o long-term

    regional or community well-being.

    It is clear and understandable.

    It can be tracked, is statistically measured at

    regular intervals, and comes rom a reliable

    source.

    It is easy to communicate in concept as well as in

    terms o its value and importance to the region.

    It measures an outcome rather than an input.

    A b o u t t h i s R e p o r t :

    Since 1999, the Great Valley Center has produced

    an annual report in the five-part State of the Great

    Central Valleyseries. The themes are updated in

    five-year increments. This publication is a follow-up

    to the first education and youth preparedness report

    released in 2004 and authored by Nancy Goodban,

    Ph.D.; Mary Jo Ortiz, M.A.; John Hedderson, Ph.D.;

    and Lisa Branton, M.S. Other reports in the series

    cover The Economy, The Environment, Community

    Well-Being, and Public Health and Access to Care.

    H o w t o U s e t h i s R e p o r t :

    The data presented are a snapshot o inormation

    providing tools or measuring the community well-

    being o the Valley. The report oers data, analysis,

    and structure which can be used as a benchmark

    or assessing the progress o the Valley, providing

    valuable comparative inormation at the county,

    subregional, regional, and state levels.

    The indicators do not present the entire picture

    o conditions or issues in the Valley, but they may

    serve as a guide and model or urther research and

    dialogue. As with any indicator eort, the data

    should be used with the understanding that there is

    much more inormation available to create a more

    complete, and sometimes more local, assessment.

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    5/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    6/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    7/44

    5

    F a mi l y & H o me l i F e 6

    Child PoPulation 7

    Children in Single Parent FamilieS 8

    Child Care 9

    Child malt reat ment 10

    FoSter Care 11

    P o v e r t y & C H i l d r e n 1 3

    Children living in Poverty 14

    Food StamP PartiCiPation 15 StudentS enrolled in Free/reduCed PriCe 16

    meal ProgramS

    e d u C a t i o n 1 7

    Children attending PreSChool 18

    engliSh learnerS 19

    third grade reading SCoreS 22

    teaCher Quality 23

    SChool CaPa City 24

    truanCy 25

    high SChool droPoutS 26

    StudentS taking the Sat 28

    uC/CSu eligible StudentS 29

    C H i l d H e a l t H 3 0

    health inSuranCe 31 dental inSuranCe 32

    PhySiCal FitneSS 33Childhood obeSity 34Juvenile drug- and alCohol-related arreStS 35

    birthS to teenS 36

    low birth weight babieS 38

    data SourCeS 39

    CitationS & deFinitionS 40

    T a b l e o f C o n T e n T s

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    8/44

    6

    As some o the single greatest inluences in a young persons lie, the amily andconditions at home can either positively or negatively aect the development o

    children. Additionally, by understanding the changing demographics o todays

    child population, we can better plan or the uture needs in the region.

    The ethnicity of the Valleys child population is shiting. Between 2000 and 2008, the

    percentage o children who are Hispanic surpassed the percent o children who are white: in

    2000, 39% o children were Hispanic and 43% were white, but in 2008, 45% are Hispanic and

    37% are white.

    The Valleys population is more youthful than the population in the rest of the state; there are

    45 children under 18 or every 100 people o working age, compared to 42 statewide.

    A higher percentage of children are living in single-parent families in the Valley (34%) than in

    the state overall (31%).

    In addition to a lack of licensed child care throughout the region, child care costs are overly

    burdensome, requiring up to 65% o a Valley minimum wage earners wages.

    The percentage of children in the Valley who have been abused or placed in foster homes

    because o abuse and neglect has declined in recent years. However, Valley rates are still

    higher than rates in the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles Region, especially in the

    North Sacramento Valley.

    f A m i l y & h o m e l i f e

    With a rapidly changing youth

    demographic, issues of diversity

    are becoming a more important

    focus for Valley schools.Martone Elementary School in

    Modesto implemented a School

    Soul Success program to help

    students, parents, and faculty

    on conflict problem-solving with

    a greater sensitivity of the role

    that cultural diversity plays.

    Activities were conducted in both

    English and Spanish.

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    9/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    10/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    11/44

    9

    Child care remains expensive and there continues tobe a shortage of licensed care in the Valley.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    Child care availability:Availability is measured

    as the percentage o children age 0-13 who have

    working parents and or whom there are child care

    slots available in either a licensed child care center or

    licensed amily child care homes. All group child care

    is required to be licensed by the State o Caliornia.

    When a paid caregiver cares or children o only one

    other amily besides their own they are exempt rom

    licensing requirements. Exempt providers include

    paid nannies, relatives, riends, or neighbors receiving

    state-subsidized child care payments or low-income

    working amilies. These exempt providers are not

    included in the child care licensing igures. Ater-

    school centers that are exempt rom licensing

    requirements are also excluded rom these counts.

    Child care affordability:Aordability is measured as

    the percent o annual Caliornia state minimum wage

    ($15,600) that was needed to place a child up to 24

    months o age in a licensed child care center during

    2006.

    C H i l d C a r e

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Children who receive quality early childhood

    education enter school more ready to learn, have

    better language, math and social skills, experience

    ewer grade retentions, and have higher high school

    graduation rates.

    Aordable child care allows more mothers to

    participate in the workorce.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    In the Valley, there are licensed child care spaces or

    27% o children who need child care, matching the

    state percentage. The child care shortage is most

    acute in the San Joaquin Valley, where there are

    spaces available or only 23% o children who need

    care. However, only two counties in the North

    Sacramento Valley and Sacramento Metropolitan

    Region have a lower percentage than Caliornia as a

    whole.

    Child care aordability varies throughout Caliornia.

    Statewide, a minimum wage earner would need to

    pay 48% o his or her wages to cover the cost o

    child care or a child between the ages o 2 and 5 in

    a licensed child care center. In general, child careis less costly in the Valley (45% o wages) than in

    the San Francisco Bay Area (59%), the Los Angeles

    Region (49%), and the state overall.

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    40%

    45%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 0-13) WITH CHILD CARE NEEDS MET BY LICENSED CARE2006

    Source: California Child Care Resource & Referral Networkhttp://www.rrnetwork.org/our-research/2007-portfolio.html

    29

    43

    29

    31

    24

    27

    30

    36

    29

    38

    20

    25 24

    21

    25 25 23

    19

    24

    California 27

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF STATE MINIMUM WAGE NEEDED TO PLACE A CHILD (AGE 2-5) IN ALICENSED CHILD CARE CENTER2006

    Source: California Child Care Resource & Referral Networkhttp://www.rrnetwork.org/our-research/2007-portfolio.html

    2004-05 Regional Market Rate Survey of California Child Care Providers

    46

    4344 43 43

    4849

    47

    43

    50

    4345

    44 4543 43

    4443 43

    California 48

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    12/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    13/44

    11

    The Valley has a higher rate of first entries to fostercare compared to the state.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    First Entries:This measures the number o childrenage 0-17 per 1,000 who were removed rom their

    homes due to child abuse or neglect and entered

    child welare-supervised oster care or the irst time

    in 2006.

    Exits to Permanency:This measures the percentage

    o children age 0-17 who were discharged rom the

    oster care system to a permanent home ater 24

    months or more in care prior to turning 18 in 2006.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Foster care provides a saety net or children whohave been removed rom their homes by child welare

    services due to child abuse or neglect. Public policy

    and law generally hold that a childs best interests are

    served by being with their parents and social service

    agencies work to strengthen the amily with the goal

    o reuniication.

    Children who are removed rom their home may

    eel socially isolated and depressed. In addition,

    many children are moved rom one oster setting to

    another. They are at risk or behavioral problems,

    drug and alcohol use, and delinquency. Those who

    remain in oster care until they age out at 18 oten

    end up homeless.

    Foster children are more likely to have physical and

    mental health problems and do poorly in school.

    F o S t e r C a r e

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    Mirroring the trends or the rates o substantiatedchild maltreatment reerrals, irst entries to oster

    care rates have declined in the Central Valley since

    1998, but still remain higher than those o Caliornia

    as a whole and other Caliornia regions.

    At 7.0 per 1,000 children in 2006, the North

    Sacramento Valley rate o entry to oster care is more

    than double that o Caliornia (3.2) and is higher

    than other Valley subregions, the San Francisco Bay

    Area (2.3), and the Los Angeles Region (3.2).

    Length o stay in oster care is an indication o how

    quickly child welare is able to resolve the problem

    that led to the childs removal. When children are

    removed rom their parents care, child welare tries

    to ind a sae environment with relatives. When

    that is not possible they are placed in non-kin oster

    homes or group homes. The goal is reuniication

    with the parents or another permanent plan or the

    child. All Valley subregions, and all but ive Valley

    counties (Colusa at 8%, Glenn at 11%, Sacramento

    at 12%, Fresno at 14%, and Stanislaus at 16%), do

    as well as or better than the state (17%), the SanFrancisco Bay Area (15%), and the Los Angeles

    Region (20%) in inding permanent homes or oster

    care children.

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    Los AngelesRegion

    San FranciscoBay Area

    San JoaquinValley

    SacramentoMetropolitan Region

    North SacramentoValley

    EXITS TO PERMANENCY FROM FOSTER CARE AFTER 24 MONTHS OR MORE IN CARE2006

    Source: UC Berkeley Center for Social Services Research (CSSR) / CA Department of Social Serviceshttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/

    17

    26

    21

    15

    20California 17

    Central Valley 21

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    200620052004200320022001200019991998

    RATE OF FIRST ENTRIES TO FOSTER CARE1998-2006

    Source: UC Berkeley Center for Social Services Research (CSSR) / CA Department of Social Serviceshttp://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelfare/

    CentralValley

    California San FranciscoBay Area

    Los AngelesRegion

    4.3

    4.8

    3.6

    4.2

    3.13.2

    4.24.64.6

    6.26.46.4

    6.1

    6.9

    3.23.3

    4.1

    3.5

    3.6

    4.2

    2.32.22.32.5

    3.43.53.8

    4.2

    4.7

    3.83.5 3.4

    2.82.8 3.1 3.2

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    14/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    15/44

    13

    One o the greatest challenges acing the Valley is the high rate o poverty.

    Poor children are more likely to go hungry, live in inadequate housing

    and unsae neighborhoods, and have poor access to health care. They are

    less likely to be in good health and succeed in school and more likely to be

    involved in the criminal justice system. The regions children, especially

    those in the San Joaquin Valley, are worse than children statewide on all

    the economic indicators measured here.

    Twenty-two percent of the Valleys children are living in poverty, compared to 18%

    in the state overall. More than one in four children in the San Joaquin Valley live

    in poverty.

    Twice as many Valley households (8%) receive food stamps than statewide (4%).

    More than 50% of children in the Valley and statewide are enrolled in free or reduced

    price meal programs at school.

    P o V e R t y & c h i l d R e n

    The Community Food Bank in

    Fresno provides nutritious food

    for 50,000 people, 38% of which

    are children, living in isolated,

    rural communities with little

    access to fresh produce each

    week. Through their Kids Caf

    and Mobile Pantry programs,

    they are also educating parents

    and children how to prepare

    healthy meals and maintain a

    balanced diet.

    PhotoprovidedbyComm

    unityFoodBank

    .

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    16/44

    14

    More than 1 in 4 children live in poverty in the SanJoaquin Valley.D e f i n i t i o n :

    Children Living in Poverty:This indicator representsthe number o children under the age o 18 living

    below the Federal Poverty Level in 2006. (In 2006,

    the poverty threshold in Caliornia or a amily o

    two adults and two children was $20,444.)

    Parental Unemployment:This indicator is measured

    as the percentage o children living in two-parent

    households in which neither parent is working or in

    single-parent households in which the one parent is

    not working.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?Children in poverty live in stressul environments

    without the necessities most children have, such as

    adequate nutrition and aid in physical and cognitive

    growth and development.

    Children rom poor amilies are less likely to urther

    their education and have a stable job and income as

    adults and are more likely to have poor health.

    C H i l d r e n l i v i n g i n P o v e r t y

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    The Central Valley (22%), overall, has a higherpercentage o children living in poverty than the

    state (18%), particularly in the San Joaquin Valley

    (26%). Both the North Sacramento Valley and

    the Sacramento Metropolitan Region are at 15%, 3

    percentage points below the state average.

    In six o the eight counties o the San Joaquin Valley,

    more than 1 in 4 children live in poverty. San

    Joaquin County (19%) and Stanislaus County (20%)

    are the two exceptions, yet still have rates higher than

    that o the state as a whole.

    At 12%, parental unemployment in the Central Valley

    is higher than the state as a whole (9%), the San

    Francisco Bay Area (7%), and the Los Angeles Region

    (9%). Only three Valley counties (El Dorado, Placer,

    and Sutter at 5%)all located in the Sacramento

    Metropolitan Regionhave rates lower than the

    state.

    O the Valley counties measured, all have a lower

    median household income than the state, which was

    $74,801 in 2006.

    NOTE: Data was not available for the North Sacramento Valley counties of

    Colusa, Glenn, and Tehama.

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    Tula

    re

    Stanisla

    us

    SanJo

    aquin

    Merced

    Madera

    King

    sKe

    rn

    Fresno

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacram

    ento

    Placer

    ElDorad

    o

    Shasta

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 0-17) LIVING IN POVERTY2006

    Source: U.S. Census Bureauhttp://factfinder.census.gov

    17

    25

    8

    5

    16

    1718

    23

    29 2930

    32

    28

    1920

    28

    California 18

    0%

    3%

    6%

    9%

    12%

    15%

    18%

    Tula

    Stanisla

    us

    SanJo

    aquin

    Merced

    Madera

    King

    sKe

    rn

    Fresno

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacram

    ento

    Placer

    ElDorad

    o

    Shasta

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 0-17) LIVING WITH UNEMPLOYED PARENT(S)2006

    Source: U.S. Census Burehttp://factfinder.census.g

    12 12

    5 5

    10

    5

    10

    16

    14 14

    12

    16

    12

    11

    12

    California 9

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    17/44

    15

    Food stamp rates are highest in the San JoaquinValley.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    A ood stamp recipient is a person receiving oodstamp coupons that can be exchanged or groceries.

    In general, households are eligible or ood stamps

    only i their gross monthly income is less than 130%

    o the Federal Poverty Level ($2,097 or a amily o

    our in 2006) and their net income is less than 100%

    o the ederal poverty level ($1,613 or a amily o

    our in 2006). Families on TANF2/CalWORKs 3

    are also generally eligible or ood stamps.

    Undocumented immigrants are not eligible to receive

    ood stamps. This indicator represents the percent o

    the total population receiving ood stamps.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    The ood stamp program is the cornerstone o

    ederally-unded ood assistance to low-income

    amilies, including those moving rom welare to

    the workorce. Food stamps provide a saety net by

    providing amilies resources to buy ood. Access to

    ood stamps helps to ensure adequate nutrition or

    children, providing a stronger oundation or healthy

    growth and development and success in school.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?Nearly twice as many Central Valley households

    receive ood stamps (just under 8%) than the

    state as a whole (just over 4%). Only three Valley

    F o o d S t a m P P a r t i C i P a t i o n

    counties have the same or lower rate o ood stampparticipation as the state: El Dorado (2%), Placer

    (1%), and Yolo (4%). All three are located in the

    Sacramento Metropolitan Region. In the San

    Joaquin Valley, all counties have a rate o at least 7%

    (San Joaquin and Stanislaus) and most are more than

    10%.

    In 2007, the US Census Bureau changed how

    they classiy the race and ethnicity o ood stamp

    participants. Prior to 2007, the Census Bureau

    only tracked the ethnicities o ood stamp recipients.

    Beginning in 2007, participants were instructed to

    indicate i they were Hispanic or Latino in addition

    to selecting a race, such as white, black, or Asian. As

    a result, racial data collected ater 2006 cannot be

    compared with ethnic data rom previous years.

    Within the Valley, the largest racial/ethnic groups

    to participate in ood stamp programs in 2006 were

    whites (39%) and Hispanics (38%). In the San

    Joaquin Valley, 52% o households receiving ood

    stamps were Hispanic, 31% white, 10% Black, 6%

    Asian/Paciic Islander, and 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native.

    NOTE: Data was not available for the North Sacramento Valley counties of

    Colusa, Glenn, and Tehama.

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    Tula

    re

    Stanisla

    us

    SanJo

    aquin

    Merced

    Madera

    King

    sKe

    rn

    Fresno

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacram

    ento

    Placer

    ElDorado

    Shasta

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS

    2006

    Source: California Department of Social Services

    http://www.cdss.ca.gov/research/PG355.htm

    6

    7

    2

    1

    7

    5

    4

    7

    10

    9

    11

    12

    10

    7 7

    13

    California 4

    PERCENTAGE OF PARTICIPATING VALLEY HOUSEHOLDS IN FEDERAL & STATE FOOD PROGRAMS

    BY RACE/ETHNICITY

    2006

    Source: California Department of Social Services

    http://www.cdss.ca.gov/research/PG355.htm

    White

    BlackHispanic

    American Indian/AlaskAsian/Pacific Islander

    Other

    39%

    38%

    14%

    8%1%

    .1%

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    18/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    19/44

    17

    In terms o student and school perormance measures such as third

    grade reading scores and average class size, the Valley as a whole has

    rates similar to those statewide. But in terms o college aspirations or

    adequately preparing young people to transer into a CSU or UC campus,

    the Valley alls short o the state norms. Challenges acing the region

    particularly the San Joaquin Valleyinclude high poverty rates, a large

    child population, and high rates o English Learners.

    At 21%, the Valley has a lower percentage of English Learners (EL) than the state as a

    whole (25%). The San Joaquin Valley, which has a signiicant Latino and Asian

    immigrant population, matches the state rate o EL. While the average third grader in

    the Valley is perorming almost as well on reading tests as the average Caliornia child,

    third graders in the San Joaquin Valley have signiicantly lower reading scores.

    The Valleys truancy rate is higher than the states (31% of students compared to 25%

    statewide). Likewise, approximately hal the regions counties have higher dropout

    rates than the state as a whole. O the 10 Valley counties with truancy rates higher than

    the state, six also have higher dropout rates.

    The regions school counselors, valuable in helping students chart the course to a

    college path, are overburdened with 759 students to each counselor, compared to 684

    students in the state as a whole.

    Additionally, high school seniors take the SAT I

    and graduate with courses meeting UC/CSU

    requirements at a lower rate in the Valley than theircounterparts statewide.

    e d u c A t i o n

    Students from Porterville High School

    painted a series of murals throughout

    their school's hallways representing the

    six pillars of character: caring, citizen-

    ship, fairness, respect, responsibility,

    and trustworthiness. During the project,

    the students also learned about project

    management and working together.

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    20/44

    Children in the San Joaquin Valley are least likelyto attend preschool. Valley rates range from 23% inTulare County to 61% in El Dorado County.

    D e f i n i t i o n :This indicator measures the number o 3- and 4-year

    olds who attend preschool, as reported by their

    parents, divided by the total number o 3- and 4-year

    olds.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Young childhood is a critical time or childrens

    cognitive, social, emotional, and physical

    development. While parents are childrens irst

    teachers and provide them with an essential

    oundation or later learning, quality preschools oer

    all children opportunities to develop important skills

    and understanding that contribute to success during

    their school years.

    Children who attend quality preschool programs are

    less likely to be placed in special education or held

    back a grade. They are also more likely to exhibit

    positive behaviors in the classroom, do better on

    standardized math and reading tests, graduate rom

    high school and continue their education.

    When every child arrives at school prepared to

    do his or her best, the whole classroom beneits.

    Furthermore, the entire K-12 system enjoys gains

    as ewer resources must be diverted to special or

    remedial education.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    A lower percentage o children in the Central Valley

    are enrolled in preschool (35%) than in the state

    (42%), the San Francisco Bay Area (53%), and the

    Los Angeles Region (40%), due particularly to the

    low San Joaquin Valley rate (31%). The North

    Sacramento Valley rate (39%) and the Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region rate (41%), while still lower

    than that o the state, are much closer.

    All counties in the San Joaquin Valleywith the

    exception o Stanislaus County at 42%have a lower

    preschool enrollment rate than the state. Conversely

    every county in the Sacramento Metropolitan

    Region, except or Sacramento at 35%, exceeds the

    state rate.

    NOTE: This data set groups Trinity Countynot considered to be in theValleywith the North Sacramento Valley counties of Colusa, Glenn, and

    Tehama.

    C H i l d r e n a t t e n d i n g P r e S C H o o l

    18

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    Los AngRegi

    San FranciscoBay Area

    San JoaquinValley

    SacramentoMetropolitan Region

    North SacramentoValley

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 3-4) ENROLLED IN SCHOOL2005

    Source: Children Now, 2007 California County Dhttp://publications.childrennow.org/publications/invest/cdb07/databook_

    IPUMS USA, Minnesota Populati

    http://usa.ipums.org/usa/in

    3941

    31

    53

    40

    California 42

    Central Valley 35

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    Tula

    re

    Stanisla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    sKe

    rn

    Fres

    noYo

    lo

    Sutt

    er/Y

    uba

    Sacr

    amento

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Shasta

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 3-4) ENROLLED IN SCHOOL2005

    Source: Children Now, 2007 California County Data Bookhttp://publications.childrennow.org/publications/invest/cdb07/databook_2007.cfm

    IPUMS USA, Minnesota Population Center

    http://usa.ipums.org/usa/index.shtml

    56

    26 27

    61 60

    35

    43

    50

    34

    29 28

    40

    28 2823

    California 42

    Colu

    sa,Gle

    nn,Teh

    ama,

    Trin

    ity

    42

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    21/44

    19

    One in four students in the San Joaquin Valley is anEnglish Learner.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    English Learners (EL) are those students or whomthere is a report o a primary language other than

    English on the state Home Language Survey. This

    survey is based on a state-approved oral language

    assessment or grades K-12 and includes a literacy

    assessment or grades 3-12 only. English Learners

    have been shown to lack the English language skills

    o listening comprehension, speaking, reading, and

    writing necessary to succeed in the schools regular

    instructional programs.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Becoming proicient in the English language is

    critical to long-term success in school, leading to

    higher socioeconomic status through high school

    graduation, college education, and better career

    opportunities.

    English proiciency opens avenues o civic and

    community participation, such as voting in elections,

    that might not otherwise be available.

    Students o lower socioeconomic backgrounds

    generally require more time to master English.

    Oral proiciency can take 3 to 5 years; academic

    competence, 4 to 7 years. 4

    At the time EL students are learning English, theymust also master content presented in the school

    curriculum.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    Because o its large immigrant population, a quarter

    o Caliornias K-12 students are classiied as EL.

    These break down to 21% in the Central Valley, 22%

    in the San Francisco Bay Area, and 28% in the Los

    Angeles Region. In the San Joaquin Valley alone,

    the percentage o EL students matches the state at

    25%.

    Among Valley counties, three have a student

    population o more than 30% EL (Colusa at 39%,

    Merced at 32%, and Madera at 31%). Additionally,

    within the San Joaquin Valley, only three counties

    have lower percentages o EL than the state: Kings

    (24%), San Joaquin (23%), and Kern (22%).

    e n g l i S H l e a r n e r S

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF ENGLISH LEARNERS

    2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    12

    39

    17

    3

    13

    5

    7

    19 19

    22

    20

    26

    22

    24

    3132

    23

    25

    29

    California 2528

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    Los Angeles

    Region

    San Francisco

    Bay Area

    San Joaquin

    Valley

    Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region

    North Sacramento

    Valley

    11

    25

    28

    PERCENTAGE OF ENGLISH LEARNERS

    2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/

    California 25

    22

    17

    Central Valley 21

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    22/44

    Finance, in the year 2000, over 43.8% o the

    students, ages 017 in the Central Valley were White

    while 38.8% were Latino. Since 2000 there has been

    a signiicant change in the demographic numbersso that in 2008, Latinos are now 45.3% o the

    ages 017 and Whites are now 37.2%. A complete

    reversal in the demographic numbers has occurred.

    These are our school age children and the economic

    uture o our Central Valley.

    An unortunate truth regarding the number o

    Latino students in the State o Caliornia, and

    especially in the Central Valley, is that a large number

    o Latino students, particularly male Latinos, are

    dropping out o schoolsome as early as middleschool. Unortunately, the number o Latino

    students who make it through high school and

    onto college campuses and eventually onto graduate

    school is minimal at best. Considering the number

    o Latino children who begin school, the number

    graduating rom high school presents a serious

    shortall. The Rand Corporation recently published

    a 2008 literature review o an empirical study, The

    Impact of Educational Quality on the Community,

    in which they pointed out the interrelatedness o

    academic achievement and the improved level o

    educational attainment. In other words, as schools

    do a better job o reaching out to and teaching our

    children, the level o educational attainment will rise.

    This may seem a somewhat simplistic statement but

    with the dropout rate o our Latino Central Valley

    students reaching as high as 44% in one assembly

    district, the point must be made.

    In July o 2008, Dr. David P. Lopez, currentCaliornia State Board o Education memberand also current President o the National Hispanic

    University in San Jose was the keynote speaker atthe summer institute organized and held by the

    Caliornia Association o Latino Superintendents and

    Administrators (CALSA). Reerring to his days as a

    young man working in the ields, he made reerence

    to his athers statement in the early morning hours

    when the water arrived to irrigate the ields, el

    agua llegthe water arrived. This was the most

    important time o the day or making sure that the

    plants received their source o growth and energy.

    His point is that or all the residents o Caliornia,

    the wave o inluence, energy, and lie orce is arrivingdaily in the orm o the Latino peopleel agua

    lleg.

    There is a demographic change occurring that

    has aected, and continues to aect, the state o

    education or the Central Valley o Caliornia. The

    change in student demographics or the State o

    Caliornia, and speciically or the Central Valley, has

    recently been described by various educational leaders

    such as Dr. Fernando Elizondo, Executive Director

    o CALSA, as a Latino Tsunami. For instance, in

    20022003 the number o Latino children attending

    schools in Caliornia was 2,819,504 or 45.2% o the

    total students. In 20062007 the number increased

    to 3,026,956 or 48.1%. During the same period o

    time in Fresno County, the Latino student population

    increased rom 102,030 to 107,780, an increase o

    over 2% (Ed-Data 2008). According to additional

    data provided by the Caliornia Department o

    Kenneth R. Magdaleno, Ed.D.

    Kremen School of Education and Human Development

    California State University, Fresno

    th e s tAte o f ed u c A t i o nf o R lAt i n o s i n t h e c e n t R A l VA l l e y

    Not everything that is faced can be changed,

    but nothing can be changed until it is faced.

    James Baldwin

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    23/44

    A quick look at the economic impact on our nation,

    state, and Central Valley is that:

    The workorce in the nation, state, and Central1.

    Valley is becoming more diverse.

    The racial/ethnic groups that are the astest2.

    growing in the nation, state, and Central Valley

    are the least educated.

    I current population trends continue and3.

    stakeholders in the nation, Caliornia, and the

    Central Valley do not improve the education o

    all students, the skills o the workorce and the

    incomes o its residents will continue to decline

    and impact all o us.

    There are currently over six million students in

    Caliornia schools, o which over 48% are Latino.

    O the 48%, more than 1.3 million studentsare Spanish-speaking and designated as English

    language learners, or emerging bilinguals and

    a national resource as described by Dr. Oelia

    Garcia, Proessor o Bilingual Education at the

    Teachers College, Columbia University. A third o

    the nations almost ive million English language

    learners are in Caliornia schools (WestEd 2008).

    As emerging bilinguals in ive to six years a great

    many o the Latino students in Caliornia will be at

    least bilingual while many o the states residents will

    remain monolingual. Such is their value as a nationalresource in a rapidly changing world where being

    bilingual and multilingual is a resource.

    This point o view diers drastically with the deicit

    thinking model that has been historically prevalent as

    it relates to Latinos, Latino students, and emerging

    bilinguals. Deicit thinking, deined by the point o

    view that deicient cultures and behaviors, most

    oten based on incorrect stereotypes, are at ault

    or the achievement gap rather than societal and

    systemic inequities, has long been used to explain the

    achievement gap in our schools and communities. In

    other words, the problem is with them, not us is

    that which oten prevents change rom occurring

    because there is no motivation to change the way we

    do things since we are not part o the problem.

    Perhaps Lisa Delpit, author o the prize winning

    book Other Peoples Children: Cultural Conflict in

    the Classroom, said it best when she stated, it all

    begins with attitude. It is extremely important that

    teachers, administrators, students, parents, and the

    community begin developing what I call an Asset

    Rich Learning Culture where what students bring

    to school, whether it be a dierent language or

    culture, is celebrated rather than seen as a deicit.

    Our students do not arrive with an empty slate.They have a culture and language rich in value. It

    is vital that our educators recognize and use the

    assets brought to school by our students as and that

    teachers and administrators begin to see themselves as

    critical bridge builders between races and cultures.

    O such importance is their role in developing the

    uture leaders o tomorrow.

    Education is certainly one o the most important

    routes to economic success. Latinos have long spoken

    to, and addressed, the many barriers to attaining aquality education. However, while acknowledging

    the act that barriers exist, it is time to look orward

    and work with other racial and ethnic groups to build

    bridges to success. Addressing issues o classroom

    rigor, equal access, higher expectations, and early

    literacy will help Latinos take their rightul place

    at the head o the class. To be Latino in Caliornia

    today is a wonderul opportunity, especially as the

    world around us becomes more diverse and that

    diversity becomes more celebrated. It is time that

    we make use o our bilingual ability and bicultural

    knowledge to make the world around us a better

    placeand it is time or those with which whom we

    live and learn rom to help us do so.

    And this will take you to a place you could only have

    imagined in years past...

    Considering the number of Latino

    children who begin school, the

    number graduating from high

    school presents a serious shortfall.

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    24/44

    22

    Two Valley subregions have higher third gradereading scores than the state overall.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    This indicator measures the number o third graders

    testing at or above the 50th national percentile

    ranking in reading on 2007 Caliornia Achievement

    Tests, Sixth Edition Survey (CAT/6 Survey), a

    nationally standardized test used in Caliornias

    Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)

    program. The purpose o administering the CAT/6

    Survey is to compare Caliornia students academic

    achievement with students nationwide. Caliornia

    students test results are compared to the results

    o a national sample o students tested in the same

    grade at the same time o the school year. Begun

    in 1998, the STAR program requires that nearly all

    students in grades 2 through 11 be tested annually.

    These test scores include English Learners who are

    designated by the schools as not luent in English.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    By the end o the third grade, children should show

    evidence o reading comprehension and be able to

    read unamiliar words through various strategies such

    as roots, preixes, and suixes.

    Third grade reading scores are highly correlated with

    later academic success. Early intervention is critical

    or children who are struggling with reading.

    Test scores are also highly correlated with

    socioeconomic status. The relatively low reading

    scores in the Valley relect the high poverty rates,

    as well as the large number o immigrant students

    whose native language is not English.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    At 37%, Central Valley third graders are reading at or

    above the 50th national percentile ranking at a rate

    nearly equal to the state as a whole (38%). Within

    the Valley, both the North Sacramento Valley (46%)

    and the Sacramento Metropolitan Region (45%)

    have rates higher than the state. However, the San

    Joaquin Valley (32%) rate is lower than those o the

    state, other Valley subregions, the San Francisco Bay

    Area (45%), and the Los Angeles Region (35%).

    All eight counties o the San Joaquin Valley have

    rates below that o the state, while within the North

    Sacramento Valley and the Sacramento Metropolitan

    Region, only two counties (Colusa at 31% and Yubaat 36%) have rates below that o the state.

    t H i r d g r a d e r e a d i n g S C o r e S

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF THIRD GRADERS TESTING AT OR ABOVE THE50TH NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANKING FOR READING

    2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2007/viewreport.asp

    46

    31

    38

    4947

    5860

    4042 43

    36

    32 32 33 33 32 3335

    28

    California 38

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Los Ange

    Regio

    San Francisco

    Bay Area

    San Joaquin

    Valley

    Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region

    North Sacramento

    Valley

    PERCENTAGE OF THIRD GRADERS READING AT OR ABOVE THE

    50TH NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANKING FOR READING2007

    Source: California Department of Ed

    http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2007/viewrep

    46 45

    32

    45

    35

    Central Valley 37

    California 38

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    25/44

    23

    There is a higher percentage of credentialed teachersin the Central Valley than in the state.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    Credentialed Teachers:This indicator measures the

    percentage o the total teaching sta in the public

    schools who have completed a teacher preparation

    program and hold a preliminary, clear, proessional

    clear, or lie teaching credential. 5

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Credentialed teachers are better equipped to

    eectively teach, manage their students, write unit

    plans, and connect with dierent cultures.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    The percentage o credentialed teachers is high

    throughout the state (95%), the Valley (96%), the

    San Francisco Bay Area (95%), and the Los Angeles

    Region (94%).

    Among Valley counties, all but our have higher

    rates than the state. The counties with the lowest

    percentage are: Merced (94%), Kings (93%), San

    Joaquin (93%), and Yuba (91%).

    t e a C H e r q u a l i t y

    %

    %

    %

    %

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF TEACHING STAFF WITH FULL TEACHING CREDENTIALS

    2007-2008

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    99

    98

    96

    99 99

    98 98

    97

    96 96

    91

    97

    95

    93

    97

    94

    93

    97

    96

    California 95

    85%

    90%

    95%

    100%

    Los Angeles

    Region

    San Francisco

    Bay Area

    San Joaquin

    Valley

    Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region

    North Sacramento

    Valley

    PERCENTAGE OF TEACHING STAFF WITH FULL TEACHING CREDENTIALS

    2007-2008

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    98

    94

    97California 95

    9595

    Central Valley 96

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    26/44

    24

    Class size in the Valley is comparable to the state, butcounselors continue to be overburdened.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    Class Size:This indicator measures class size, which

    is derived rom the number o students enrolled

    divided by the number o classes in which these

    students are enrolled. Classroom counts and

    enrollment counts used in calculation do not

    include the ollowing: classes with enrollment o 0

    or more than 50 students, special education classes,

    teachers who do not have other instruction-related

    assignments, and department chairs. Average class

    size is reported here or grades K-12.

    Counselor/Student Ratio:The counselor/student

    ratio measures the number o K-12 counselorsavailable divided by the number o students enrolled.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Smaller class sizes, when coupled with good teachers,

    have been ound to be eective in improving

    student achievement, although the results o class

    size reduction are mixed because low-income and

    rural districts can ace diiculty in recruiting highly

    qualiied and experienced teachers.

    The number o counselors is signiicant, particularly

    in high schools, because it indicates the support

    that is available or students with regard to career

    planning and preparation or college.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    Average class size numbers include K-3, in which the

    class sizes are typically around 20 students, as well as

    the later elementary and secondary classes which are

    much larger. The average class size or Caliornia is

    25 students. Within the Valley, average class sizes

    vary between 21 and 25 students. Colusa, Glenn,

    and Yuba counties have the lowest average class sizesat 21 students.

    At 759 students to every counselor in the Central

    Valley, counselors have more than three times

    as many students to oversee than the American

    School Counselor Association recommended

    1:250. Statewide, there are 684 students to every

    counselor. The highest pupil counselor ratios in the

    Valley can be ound in the San Joaquin Valley (811),

    particularly in Kings (1010), Madera (1279), and

    Tulare (1072) counties. Thirteen o the 19 counties

    in the Valley have pupil counselor ratios higher than

    the statewide ratio.

    S C H o o l C a P a C i t y

    0

    10

    20

    30

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    AVERAGE CLASS SIZE

    2007-2008

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    24

    21 21

    2 3 23

    2524 24

    22

    25

    21

    2524 24

    2324

    25 25 25California 25

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1,000

    1,200

    1,400

    Stan

    isla

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PUPIL/COUNSELOR RATIO

    2007-2008

    Source: California Department of Ed

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/da

    5

    90

    California 684

    756

    691

    57

    0

    451

    916

    615

    633

    714

    705

    742

    666

    853

    1279

    1010

    802

    719

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    27/44

    25

    A higher percentage of Valley students are truantthan in the state and other California regions.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    A truant student is deined as a student with an

    unexcused absence or tardy or three or more days

    per school year.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Truancy has been correlated with students dropping

    out o high school. 6

    Truant students are at risk or educational ailure,

    social isolation, substance abuse, low sel-esteem,

    unwanted pregnancy, unemployment, violence and

    criminality, and incarceration as adults. 7

    Truants are more likely to participate in daytimejuvenile crime. 8

    t r u a n C y

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    The Central Valleys rate o truant students (31%)

    is substantially higher than the state overall (25%),

    the San Francisco Bay Area (24%) and the Los

    Angeles Region (24%). Within the Valley, both the

    Sacramento Metropolitan Region (31%) and the San

    Joaquin Valley (32%) have rates higher than that o

    the North Sacramento Valley (24%).

    Among Valley counties there is much variation. Nine

    o the 19 counties have truancy rates below that o

    the state overall, while 6 o the remaining 10 have

    rates greater than 30%: San Joaquin (31%), Yolo

    (31%), Kern (36%), Stanislaus (36%), Sacramento(37%), and Fresno (38%).

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    Tulare

    Stan

    islaus

    SanJo

    aquin

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    Kings

    Kern

    Fresno

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutter

    Sacr

    amento

    Placer

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shasta

    Glenn

    Colusa

    Butte

    PERCENTAGE OF TRUANT STUDENTS2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    26

    14

    12

    30

    14

    22

    16

    37

    28

    31

    19

    38

    36

    18

    28

    23

    31

    36

    17

    California 25

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    Los Angeles

    Region

    San Francisco

    Bay Area

    San Joaquin

    Valley

    Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region

    North Sacramento

    Valley

    PERCENTAGE OF TRUANT STUDENTS2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    24

    3132

    24 24

    California 25

    Central Valley 31

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    28/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    29/44

    27

    U N D E R S T A N D I N G T H E

    S T A T E W I D E S T U D E N T I D E N T I F I E R S Y S T E M

    Prior to 2008, high school dropout rates were calculatedusing complex ormulas that were, admittedly, educated

    guesses. But in 2002, Caliornia State Senate Bill 1453

    required that each student be assigned a unique and

    anonymous Statewide Student Identiier (SSID). In July

    2008, the Caliornia Department o Education (CDE)

    oicially released data or the school year o 2006-2007,

    stating that it is the most accurate data to date. Given

    the change in calculation methods, data rom previous

    years cannot be compared with the newly-released data.

    The new SSID system allows the CDE to more accurately

    ollow a students path throughout their school years. For example, under previous methodology, i astudent reported plans to transer to another school, there was no mechanism to know i they actually

    enrolled in another school. Now, i that student does not reenroll, it is known and schools can ollow-

    up. The new system also paints a clearer picture o student activity with 28 student withdrawal codes,

    allowing educators to speciically target problem areas.

    The system does have its limitations, however. Some school districts may not be adequately equipped to

    update the data and be inclined to mark other when the location o a student is unknown. All o these

    students are then counted as dropouts. Additionally, the CDE is still using enrollment data collected on

    CBEDS Inormation Day rather than actual numbers. This is particularly problematic or schools with

    high-volumes o short-term students. Once student-level data are collected or our-years, the CDE will

    be able to provide more accurate numbers rather than estimated dropout rates based on actual data orone year.

    Anticipated to be ully implemented in 2009-2010, the Caliornia Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data

    System (CALPADS) will provide educators with even more inormation.

    The dismal educational outcomes should prod Caliornias leadership to address more ully a critical issue

    aecting the states ability to compete economically with other states and countries.

    For More Information:

    SSID and a complete list o student withdrawal codes: www.cde.ca.gov/ds/td/lo/ssid.aspCaliornia Dropout Research Project: www.lmri.ucsb.edu/dropouts

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    30/44

    Fewer than 30% of Valley high school seniors arepreparing for a college career by taking the SAT I.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    This indicator measures the percent o high schoolseniors taking the SAT I, although many students

    take the SAT I in both their junior and senior years.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    The SAT I is used by colleges and universities to

    determine the probable success that students will

    have in post-secondary education and is required by

    many in the admission process.

    The number o students taking the SAT I also

    indicates how many students plan on attending

    college and how well our schools are doing helpingour students aspire to a postsecondary education.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    Central Valley students are ar less likely to take theSAT (27%) than students in the state overall (37%),

    the San Francisco Bay Area (47%), and the Los

    Angeles Region (38%). Within the Valley, students

    in the North Sacramento Valley (22%) and the San

    Joaquin Valley (25%) are taking the SAT I at a lower

    rate than students in the Sacramento Metropolitan

    Region (34%).

    Among Valley counties, only twoboth in the

    Sacramento Metropolitan Regionhave rates higher

    than the state: Placer at 38% and Yolo at 43%. In

    three Valley counties, ewer than one in ive seniorsare thinking about their utures by taking the SAT I:

    Madera and Yuba at 18% and Tehama at 15%.

    S t u d e n t S t a k i n g t H e S a t

    28

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS TAKING THE SAT I

    2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Educationhttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    25

    30

    2120

    15

    35

    38

    34

    23

    43

    18

    31

    24 24

    18

    2425

    2022

    California 37

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    Los Ang

    Regi

    San Francisco

    Bay Area

    San Joaquin

    Valley

    Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region

    North Sacramento

    Valley

    PERCENTAGE OF HIGH SCHOOL SENIORS TAKING THE SAT I2006-2007

    Source: California Department of E

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/d

    22

    34

    25

    47

    38

    California 37

    Central Valley 27

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    31/44

    The average high school student in the Valley is lesslikely to complete courses required for admission intothe UC/CSU system than the average Californiahigh school student.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    Another measure o college readiness is the

    percentage o twelth grade graduates who have

    completed all the courses required or University o

    Caliornia (UC) and/or Caliornia State University

    (CSU) entrance with a grade o C or better.

    Course completion represents only a portion o the

    entrance requirements or UC or CSU.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    College attendance leads to better uture

    employment chances and higher socioeconomicstatus.

    Completion o UC/CSU required courses represents

    the maximum number o students who may be

    eligible to attend post-secondary education; not all

    students complete the other requirements. It also

    relects school capacity, including the availability o

    academic guidance counselors and their eectiveness

    in encouraging completion o the requirements.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    UC/CSU course requirement completion in the

    Valley (30% o high school graduates in 2007) is

    lower than the state overall (35%), the San Francisco

    Bay Area (46%), and the Los Angeles Region (37%),

    thus making students less prepared or a uture

    college career. The rate is particularly low in the

    North Sacramento Valley (24%), compared to 29% in

    the Sacramento Metropolitan Region and 32% in the

    San Joaquin Valley.

    In only ive Valley counties did more than 30% o

    students completed the course requirements to

    transer to a UC or CSU, including Kings (31%),

    Placer (36%), Yolo (38%), El Dorado (39%), and

    Fresno (46%). On the other end o the spectrum,

    six counties have rates o 20% or lower: Sutter (9%),

    Colusa and Shasta (17%), Yuba (18%), Madera(19%), and Merced (20%).

    When comparing UC/CSU course completion by

    race and ethnicity, Asian/Paciic Islander students

    have the highest completion rates among graduates

    in that racial group. In recent years, the rates o

    white and American Indian/Alaska Native students

    have dropped, while all other group rates have

    increased.

    Caliornia Community Colleges (CCC) are a more

    aordable and accessible higher education optionor many students. Valley high school graduates

    are more than twice as likely to transer directly to a

    CCC (23.2%) than they are to a CSU (10.3%) and

    more than ive times as likely to transer directly to a

    CCC than to a UC (4.4%).

    u C / C S u e l i g i b l e S t u d e n t S

    29

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES MEETING UC/CSU COURSE REQUIREMENTS

    2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    26

    17

    29

    17

    26

    39

    36

    23

    9

    38

    18

    46

    23

    31

    1920

    25

    2123

    California 35

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    2006-20072003-20041997-19981994-1995

    PERCENTAGE OF CENTRAL VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES MEETINGUC/CSU COURSE REQUIREMENTS BY RACE/ETHNICITY

    1994-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    White Asian/Pacific Islander

    Black

    American Indian/

    Alaska Native

    Hispanic/Latino

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    32/44

    30

    The Valley generally ares better than the state as a whole concerning

    measures o overall child health, such as health and dental insurance,

    physical itness, and childhood obesity. However, measures that address

    high-risk behavior such as drug and alcohol use and early sexual activity

    leading to teen pregnancy show that the Valley is struggling, particularly

    in the North Sacramento Valley.

    Ninety-three percent of children in the Valley have health insurance and 81% have

    dental insurance, close to the rates statewide. But disparities exist between racial and

    ethnic groups. Latino and American Indian/Alaska Native children are less likely to

    have health insurance than other groups.

    While the percentages of children who are physically fit or obese in the Valley are similar

    to statewide percentages, the overall picture is poor. Only 32% o Valley 9th graders are

    considered physically it and 33% o Valley 5th, 7th, and 9th graders are obese.

    The juvenile drug- and alcohol-related arrest rate for the Valley is 7.4 per 1,000

    children age 10-17, which is very close to the state rate o 7.0. In the North

    Sacramento Valley, the rate is much higher at 12.3.

    Likewise, the percentage of births to teen mothers in the Valley is 11.5% in the Central

    Valley, while only 9.1% statewide.

    c h i l d h e A l t h

    Physical activity has

    substantial health benefits

    for children and adolescents,

    including favorable effectson endurance capacity,

    muscular strength, body

    weight and blood pressure.

    Schools that offer physical

    education programs also post

    positive effects on academic

    achievement for students.

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    33/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    34/44

    32

    Compared to the other Valley subregions, the NorthSacramento Valley has the lowest dental insurancecoverage rate.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    This indicator measures the percent o children age

    0-17 with dental insurance at the time the Caliornia

    Health Interview Survey was completed.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Many pediatricians identiy dental problems as

    a serious concern, especially among low-income

    children.

    Children who see a hygienist or dentist are more

    likely to be educated on the importance and proper

    method o caring or teeth and gums.

    Parents learn to avoid dental problems such as early

    caries (a demineralization o the tooth surace caused

    by bacteria) or baby bottle tooth decay caused by

    allowing the child to go to sleep with a bottle that

    has juice or milk in it.

    Having dental insurance makes it more likely that a

    child will receive assessment and treatment or dental

    problems, including seeing a hygienist or teeth

    cleaning every six months.

    d e n t a l i n S u r a n C e

    Improper or lack o dental care leads to dental

    problems and, in turn, discomort and pain which

    distracts children rom classroom instruction,

    subsequently impeding learning and potentially

    causing more serious and expensive dental problems

    in the uture.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    The Central Valley has a slightly higher percentage

    (81%) o children with dental insurance compared to

    the state overall (79%). Among Valley subregions,

    the Sacramento Metropolitan Region has the highestrate (83%), ollowed by the San Joaquin Valley (80%)

    and the North Sacramento Valley (74%) with a rate

    below that o the state.

    The highest coverage rates in the Valley are ound in

    the Sacramento Metropolitan Region in Sutter (87%)

    and Yuba (88%) counties. The counties with the

    lowest rates are Butte (70%) and Shasta (73%) in the

    North Sacramento Valley.

    Children who live in rural areas are less likely to have

    access to a pediatric dentist whether or not they areinsured.

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    Tulare

    Stanislaus

    SanJo

    aquin

    Merced

    Madera

    Kings

    Kern

    Fresno

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutter

    Sacram

    ento

    Placer

    ElDorado

    Shasta

    Butte

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 0-17) WITH DENTAL INSURANCE2005

    Source: 2005 California Health Interview Surveyhttp://www.chis.ucla.edu/

    70

    82

    73

    84

    76

    84

    87

    80

    88

    79 79

    86

    83

    8079

    82

    California 79

    Colu

    sa,Glenn

    ,Teham

    a

    82

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    Los AngRegi

    San FranciscoBay Area

    San JoaquinValley

    SacramentoMetropolitan Region

    North SacramentoValley

    PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN (AGE 0-17) WITH DENTAL INSURANCE2005

    Source: 2005 California Health Interviehttp://www.chis.u

    74

    83

    80

    84

    77

    California 79

    Central Valley 81

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    35/44

    33

    Student physical fitness rates have been improvingthroughout the state since 2000.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    The Caliornia Physical Fitness Test is administeredto students in public schools. This indicator

    measures the percentage o ninth grade students

    tested in 2006-2007 who obtained scores within

    the Healthy Fitness Zone with respect to aerobic

    itness, body composition, abdominal strength,

    trunk extension strength, upper body strength,

    and lexibility. Students are required to meet all

    six standards to be considered physically it. The

    Healthy Fitness Zone represents a level o itness that

    oers some degree o protection against diseases that

    result rom sedentary living.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Physically it children have better memory,

    concentration and energy levels, are healthier

    physically and emotionally, and are less prone to

    obesity and Type 2 diabetes.

    These children are likely to continue practicing a

    healthy liestyle while adults, making them less likely

    to be obese or have heart disease, strokes, high

    blood pressure, Type 2 diabetes, cancer, ractures,

    and depression.

    The American Heart Association recommends that

    children ages ive and older get at least 30 minutes

    o moderate exercise every day and 30 minutes o

    vigorous exercise 3-4 times a week.

    It is important or schools to ensure that studentsparticipate regularly in physical education classes. In

    addition, with ewer students walking or biking to

    school and playing outside ater school, and with

    some schools reducing P.E. classes due to other

    requirements, amilies must ocus on helping their

    children stay it. Family activities can include hiking,

    walking, bicycling, or playing in the park so that

    children and parents can build a healthy liestyle

    together.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?Rates o physical itness among ninth grade students

    have been increasing steadily since 2000-2001. In

    general, the average Valley student is a little more

    likely to be physically it than students in the Los

    Angeles Region, but slightly worse than the San

    Francisco Bay Area. Within the Valley, the North

    Sacramento Valley has traditionally had higher rates

    o physical itness and experienced a sharp increase

    between the school years o 2005-2006 and 2006-

    2007.

    In only two Valley counties are ewer than a quarter

    o ninth graders physically it: Merced at 21% and

    Yuba at 18%. In 10 o the remaining 18 counties, at

    least one-third o students are physically it.

    P H y S i C a l F i t n e S S

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    %

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF PHYSICALLY FIT NINTH GRADERS

    2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    48

    32

    43 43

    31

    4142

    3334

    32

    18

    33

    27

    39

    28

    21

    2526

    37

    California 30

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    2006-20072005-20062004-20052003-20042002-20032001-20022000-2001

    PERCENTAGE OF PHYSICALLY FIT NINTH GRADERS

    2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Education

    http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/

    North

    Sacramento ValleyCalifornia Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region

    San Joaquin

    Valley

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    36/44

    34

    Obesity is most prevalent in the San Joaquin Valley.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    Childhood obesity is measured using the body

    composition component o the Caliornia Physical

    Fitness Test administered to grades 5, 7, and 9 in

    public schools. Students whose test scores indicate

    that they are not in the Healthy Fitness Zone or

    body composition are considered to be obese. Body

    composition test results provide an estimate o the

    percent o a students weight that is at.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Childhood obesity has many health and psychosocial

    consequences that oten continue into adulthood.

    Children who are overweight are at risk odeveloping high blood pressure, high cholesterol,

    asthma, and Type 2 diabetes. These children also

    have the potential o becoming overweight in

    adulthood as well as having a stroke, heart disease,

    or arthritis as adults. The psychosocial consequences

    o childhood obesity include decreased sel-esteem,

    depression, and anxiety.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    Obesity rates are high in the state overall (32%), the

    Valley (33%), the San Francisco Bay Area (28%),

    and the Los Angeles Region (34%). In the Valley,

    the San Joaquin Valley has the highest percentage

    o obese children (35%) and the Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region has the lowest (29%).

    Within the San Joaquin Valley, more than one-third

    o children are obese in every county, while this is

    true o only two counties in the North Sacramento

    Valley (Colusa at 37% and Glenn at 34%) and no

    counties in the Sacramento Metropolitan Region.

    C H i l d H o o d o b e S i t y

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF OBESE CHILDREN (GRADES 5, 7, & 9)2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Educationhttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest

    28

    California 32

    3029

    34

    37

    32

    303030

    24

    22

    343535

    3738

    3736

    34

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    Los AngRegi

    San FranciscoBay Area

    San JoaquinValley

    SacramentoMetropolitan Region

    North SacramentoValley

    PERCENTAGE OF OBESE STUDENTS (GRADE 5, 7, & 9)2006-2007

    Source: California Department of Ehttp://dq.cde.ca.gov/d

    3029

    35

    28

    34California 32

    Central Valley 33

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    37/44

    35

    crime. That is, the data do not simply relect teen drug

    and alcohol use; some jurisdictions crack down with a

    get tough approach and show higher arrest rates.

    Alcohol is the most commonly used substance among

    youth. It is correlated with other risky behaviors such as

    truancy, ighting, drunk driving, and sexual activity.

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    Juvenile drug- and alcohol-related arrest rates in

    the Valley (7.4 per 1,000) are slightly higher than

    those in the state as a whole (7.0), due mostly to

    the North Sacramento Valley (12.3). Both the

    Sacramento Metropolitan Region (6.7) and the

    San Joaquin Valley (7.1) have rates closer to that o

    the state. Rates o elony and misdemeanor arrests

    ollow a similar pattern to that o the combined

    totals.

    Since 1996, both juvenile elony and misdemeanor

    arrest rates or drug- and alcohol-related oenses

    have steadily decreased, with the exception o the

    North Sacramento Valley, which has seen a slightincrease in both elony and misdemeanor arrests

    since that time.

    Juvenile drug- and alcohol-related arrest rates areincreasing in the North Sacramento Valley anddeclining in the San Joaquin Valley and Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    This indicator represents the percentage o elony

    and misdemeanor drug- and alcohol-related arrests

    o juveniles age 10-17. Misdemeanor arrests include

    drunk and disorderly conduct, Driving Under the

    Inluence (DUI), liquor law violations, glue sniing,

    marijuana, and other drug oenses. Felony arrests

    tend to involve injury or substantial property loss,

    and can include DUI, marijuana, dangerous drugs,

    and other drug oenses.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Drug and alcohol use can lead to poor health, academic

    ailure, and other problems.

    Juvenile drug- and alcohol-related arrests are the tip o

    the iceberg; the vast majority o teen drug and alcohol

    use does not conclude in arrest.

    Identiying the prevalence o teen drug- and alcohol-

    related arrests is important in assisting community

    leaders and policy makers in the development o

    programs which ocus on prevention, education,

    and direct targeting o resources or treatment and

    intervention. At the same time, interpretation o these

    data needs to take into account local policies on juvenile

    J u v e n i l e d r u g - a n d a l C o H o l - r e l a t e d a r r e S t S

    0

    6

    2

    8

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    FELONY & MISDEMEANOR ARREST RATE FOR DRUG- OR ALCOHOL-RELATED OFFENSES(PER 1,000 JUVENILES AGE 10-17)2005

    Source: Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justicehttp://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/datatabs.php

    Misdemeanor Arrests Felony Arrests

    11.

    5

    1.

    2

    3.

    1

    1.

    7

    1.

    9

    1.

    8

    9.

    9

    9.

    2

    14.

    1

    10.

    0

    0.

    3

    1.

    5

    0.

    9

    1.

    4

    1.

    7

    1.

    2

    1.

    1

    1.

    7

    1.

    5

    1.

    4

    0.

    7

    1.

    1

    1.

    2

    1.

    3

    14.

    6

    7.

    5

    7.

    4

    3.

    5

    7.

    0

    9.

    6

    6.

    6

    5.

    3

    4.

    5

    8.

    0

    4.

    6

    15.

    1

    4.

    2

    6.

    1

    California 5.6

    California 1.4

    12.8

    10.7

    12.9

    10.9

    11.8

    14.9

    9.18.3

    4.8

    8.77.7

    7.1

    6.0

    9.4

    5.3

    16.2

    5.4

    7.4

    15.9

    0

    6

    12

    18

    2005200420032002200120001999199819971996

    FELONY & MISDEMEANOR ARREST RATE FOR DRUG- OR ALCOHOL-RELATED OFFENSES(PER 1,000 JUVENILES AGE 10-17)1996-2005

    Source: Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justicehttp://ag.ca.gov/cjsc/datatabs.php

    CentralValley

    California San FranciscoBay Area

    Los AngelesRegion

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    38/44

    H o w a r e w e d o i n g ?

    While births to teen mothers have been steadilydeclining since 1996, the Central Valley percentage

    (11.5%) continues to be signiicantly higher than the

    state percentage (9.1%), that o the San Francisco

    Bay Area (5.7%), and that o the Los Angeles Region

    (9.4%). This dierence can be accounted or the

    high rates ound in the North Sacramento Valley

    (11.6%) and the San Joaquin Valley (13%). The

    Sacramento Metropolitan Region, at 8.4%, ares

    better than the state as a whole.

    Within Valley counties, only our have a rate o

    births to teen mothers under 10%: Placer at 4.9%,

    El Dorado at 6.8%, Yolo at 7.7%, and Sacramento

    at 8.9%. All are located in the Sacramento

    Metropolitan Region.

    The rate of teen pregnancy is declining, but the

    Valley still exceeds the other regions in the state.

    D e f i n i t i o n :

    This indicator represents live births to mothers age15-19 as a percentage o all live births.

    W h y i s i t i m p o r t a n t ?

    Children born to teen mothers are typically born into

    a disadvantaged lie, where athers are oten absent

    or not supportive to the mother in raising the child.

    This compounds the eect o teen mothers being

    poorly prepared or motherhood with limited savings,

    education, work experience, and emotional maturity.

    Many teens who have babies are dependent on Medi-

    Cal.

    Teen mothers are more likely to drop out o school and

    less likely to marry. It takes many years or them to

    begin to earn income and have education comparable to

    others their age.

    Children o teen mothers are more likely to have

    behavioral problems and academic trouble throughout

    their school years.

    b i r t H S t o t e e n S

    36

    0%

    6%

    12%

    18%

    Tula

    re

    Stan

    isla

    us

    SanJo

    aqui

    n

    Mer

    ced

    Mad

    era

    King

    s

    Kern

    Fres

    no

    Yuba

    Yolo

    Sutt

    er

    Sacr

    amen

    to

    Plac

    er

    ElDor

    ado

    Teha

    ma

    Shas

    ta

    Glen

    n

    Colu

    sa

    Butt

    e

    PERCENTAGE OF LIVE BIRTHS TO TEEN MOTHERS (AGE 15-19)2005

    Source: California Department of Public Healthhttp://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Pages/CountyBirthStatisticalDataTables.aspx

    10.3

    California 9.1

    12.812.0

    13.9

    11.8

    13.3

    7.7

    10.2

    8.9

    4.9

    6.8

    13.0

    14.2 14.1 14.213.3

    11.3 11.4

    13.9

    0%

    6%

    12%

    18%

    200420032002200120001999199819971996

    PERCENTAGE OF LIVE BIRTHS TO TEEN MOTHERS (AGE 15-19)1996-2005

    Source: California Department of Publichttp://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Pages/CountyBirthStatisticalDataTab

    CentralValley

    California San FranciscoBay Area

    Los Regi

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    39/44

    I S S U E B R I E F

    F O R G I R L S O N L Y

    Youth development comes in many orms

    including leadership training, political and

    civic engagement, recreational alternatives, and

    educational programs, all designed to encourage

    young people in sel-discovery and ostering a

    sense o sel-worth and responsibility to grow

    into conident and successul adults.

    But not all youth are equal. At Girls

    Incorporated, it is acknowledged that while

    boys and girls are similar, girls also have and

    do ace speciic challenges that are better met

    in a setting exclusively or them and has been

    empowering girls o all ages or nearly 150 years

    through its 105 local chapters in the US and

    Canada. Under the guiding principle o creating a sae and supportive environment or girls, Girls Inc.

    programs ree girls rom stereotypical roles and allow them to develop healthy and independent images o

    themselves.

    In 2006, Girls Inc. o the Northern Sacramento Valley was incorporated, serving the counties o Shasta,

    Tehama, and Glenn. Being the only Girls Inc. eort in the Central Valley, it is uniquely positioned to

    address some o the struggles o the region, including teen pregnancy, child maltreatment, and drug and

    alcohol use. They ocus their eorts through our core programs: Will Power/Wont Power addressingthe avoidance o early pregnancy by planning or the uture, Project BOLD equipping girls with the

    power to protect themselves against violence, Friendly PEERsuasion directed toward substance abuse

    prevention and being positive peer inluences, and a Girls Circle support program providing a place where

    girls can encourage one another through sharing their own experiences.

    In a region marked by low household incomes and educational attainment, Girls Inc. is inspiring and

    empowering girls in the Northern Sacramento Valley to secure a brighter uture or themselves.

    For More Information:

    Girls Inc. o the Northern Sacramento Valley: www.girlsincnsv.org

    37

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    40/44

  • 7/31/2019 Assessing The Education and Youth of the Great Valley Center - 2008

    41/44

    39

    F a m i l y & H o m e L i f e

    Child Population

    Youth Dependency Ratio Data

    U.S. Census Bureau

    2006 Population Estimates, Table T8-2006

    http://actinder.census.gov/

    Race/Ethnic Data

    Caliornia Department o Finance

    Race/Ethnic Population Projections

    with Age and Sex Detail

    www.do.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/Data/

    RaceEthnic/Population-00-50/RaceData_2000-2050.php

    Children in Single Parent Families

    U.S. Census Bureau

    2006 American Community Survey, Table B23008http://actinder.census.gov/

    Child Care

    Caliornia Child Care Resource & Reerral Network

    The Caliornia Child Care Portolio, 2007

    www.rrnetwork.org/our-research/2007-portolio.html

    Availability Population Data

    Caliornia Department o Finance

    Race/Ethnic Population Projections

    with Age and Sex Detail

    www.do.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/Data/

    RaceEthnic/Population-00-50/RaceData_2000-2050.php

    Availability Parental Labor Force Data

    U.S. Census Bureau

    2000 Census

    http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html

    Affordability Data

    2004-05 Regional Market Rate Survey o Caliornia Child

    Care Providers

    Child Maltreatment

    UC Berkeley Center or Social Services Research (CSSR)

    Caliornia Department o Social Services

    Child Welare Dynamic Report System, Reerral &

    Substantiation Rates

    http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelare/

    Foster Care

    First Entry Data

    UC Berkeley Center or Social Services Research (CSSR)

    Caliornia Department o Social Services

    Child Welare Dynamic Report System, Entry Rates

    http://cssr.berkeley.edu/ucb_childwelare/

    Exits to Permanency