14
Assessing Variation in Revenue- Generating Strategies of Local Health Departments Sergey Sotnikov, PhD; Huabin Luo, PhD; Timothy Van Wave, DrPH Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support Centers for Disease Control and Prevention APHA 142 nd Annual Meeting November 15-19, 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support

Assessing Variation in Revenue-Generating Strategies of Local Health Departments

  • Upload
    said

  • View
    32

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Assessing Variation in Revenue-Generating Strategies of Local Health Departments. Sergey Sotnikov, PhD; Huabin Luo, PhD; Timothy Van Wave, DrPH. Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support Centers for Disease Control and Prevention APHA 142 nd Annual Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Assessing Variation in Revenue-Generating Strategies of Local Health Departments

Sergey Sotnikov, PhD; Huabin Luo, PhD; Timothy Van Wave, DrPHOffice for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

APHA 142nd Annual MeetingNovember 15-19, 2014

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionOffice for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support

Page 2: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Background and Research Objective

Local health departments (LHDs) rely on funding from various revenue sources, including state, local, and federal funds, fees, personal services billing, and health insurers.

The purposes of the study were to Describe the relative contribution of these funding sources Evaluate how LHD revenue-generating strategies (broad diversification

vs. reliance on one revenue source) are associated with the overall levels of LHD spending

Page 3: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

NACCHO, 2010. National Profile of Local Health Departments. Available at http://nacchoprofilestudy.org/materials/2010-profile-study/.

City Township Town State Tribal Private foundations Private insurance

Federal Medicaid Medicare Patient personal fees Non-clinical fees Fines

Data were obtained from the 2010 National Profile of Local Health Departments Study (Profile study), in which LHD directors were asked to apportion LHD revenues (in %) across the following categories:

Study Design

Page 4: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Study Design (continued)

Each LHD revenue-source pattern can be described on a continuum, from well-diversified to highly dependent on one source.

We calculated a degree of diversification of revenues for each LHD using the Herfindahl index (defined as a sum of squared shares of all revenue sources).

A revenue stream is considered to be well diversified if the Herfindahl index is below the threshold point of 1,500.

Page 5: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Population Studied

A sample of 1,363 LHDs that participated in the NACCHO 2010 Profile study

Page 6: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Principal FindingsPer Capita Spending

LHDs with well-diversified revenues (Herfindahl index <1,500) spent $93/capita, 55% more than the sample’s average of $60/capita, reflecting the sample’s less diversified average revenue portfolio.

LHDs with more diversified portfolios of revenues were associated with higher per capita public health spending in communities served by LHDs.

Page 7: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments
Page 8: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments
Neitzel, Stephanie (CDC/OSTLTS/OD) (CTR)
Page 9: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Principal Findings LHDs receiving more than 50% of their revenue from

Medicaid spent $102/per capita, almost twice the sample average.

LHDs obtaining more than 50% of their total revenues from federal or state sources were spending at average per capita levels of $60/person and employing an average number of full-time employees (FTEs).

LHDs getting more than 50% of their total revenues from county and city sources spent 1/3 and 1/2 less than average LHD and employed 50%–75% fewer FTEs.

The number of services provided by LHDs do not vary by revenue categories.

Page 10: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments
Page 11: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Conclusions

LHDs with well-diversified revenue sources were positively associated with higher levels of LHD per capita spending.

LHDs relying on Medicaid as principal source of revenue were also associated with higher levels of LHD per capita spending.

Page 12: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Implications for Policy, Delivery, or Practice

Diversifying revenue sources might help LHDs maximize available funds for community health improvement.

Page 13: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

Implications for Policy, Delivery, or Practice (continued)

LHDs relying on Medicaid as the principal source of revenue were the most successful in securing financial resources for public health spending.

Withdrawing from provision of personal care services (paid for by Medicaid), as recommended by IOM, may have a negative effect on LHDs that are relying on Medicaid as the principal source of revenue.

Page 14: Assessing Variation in  Revenue-Generating  Strategies of Local Health  Departments

For more information, please contact CDC’s Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support

4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop E-70, Atlanta, GA 30341Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.cdc.gov/stltpublichealth

The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Questions? Comments?

We value your input!Sergey [email protected]

Centers for Disease Control and PreventionOffice for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support