ASSESSMENT REPORT ON FOLLOW UP SOIL SAMPLING SURVEY · andrew tims, p.geo_ utm zone 16 -nad 83 projection 530930me,5499270mn july 24, 2008 ~ eived .1111282008 g!:o:c.~· ~> f, ssess~1ei~t

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

""'- -

ASSESSMENT REPORT ON FOLLOW UP SOIL

SAMPLING SURVEY

ON THE

Long Lake Property

McBean Lake Area, Thunder Bay Mining District

PREPARED BY:

Andrew Tims, P.Geo_

UTM Zone 16 - NAD 83 Projection

530930mE,5499270mN

July 24, 2008

~ EIVED .1111282008

G!:O:C.~· ~> f, SSESS~1EI~T ; :-: .E


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION 2

LOCATION AND ACCESS 2

CLAIMS AND OWNERSHIP 2

PREVIOUS WORK 4

REGIONAL GEOLOGY 6

WORK PROGRAM SUMMARY 9

Data Display 12

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12

REFERENCES 14

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 15

APPENDIX 1 - SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION MAPAPPENDIX 2 - SOIL ASSAY CERTIFICATES 16

APPENDIX 2 - SOIL ASSAY CERTIFICATES 17

Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4

Table 1 Table 2 Table 3

Map 1

FIGURES

Provincial Location Map Property Claim Map Regional Geology Map Compilation of Past and Present Gold Soil Geochemistry

TABLES

Property Claims List Mine Production Statistics, Geraldton, Ontario Soil Sample Data and Results

B" Horizon Gold Results (1:5000)


INTRODUCTION

This report presents and sununarizes the results of a 33 "B" Horizon soil sampling program,

completed during the period of June 4th to 5th, 2008, on the Long Lake property in Abrey

Township (Figure 1) of the Thunder Bay Mining District. Cameron Shaw of Ottawa,

Ontario, with assistance from Fred Blair of Winnipeg, Manitoba, undertook the soil program

under the direction of Andrew Tims of Thunder Bay, Ontario.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Long Lake property is located in Abrey township and in the McBean Lake area,

approximately 20 kilometre's east of Geraldton, 8 kilometres south of Longlac, in the

Thunder Bay mining district on NTS sheet 42E/10. (Fig. 1). The sampling covered

TB1241540 north of McBean Lake on the McBean Lake Area claim map (G-0321),

centered on UTM Zone 16 coordinates 531242E and 5499082N using NAD83

projection. Access for prospecting was by canoe from the boat launch at the

divergence of the Making Ground River and the forestry access road running beside

it, to t~e south shore of Milbean Lake, where thE prospecting and sampling were

conducted by foot.

CLAIMS AND OWNERSHIP

The Long Lake property consists of 4 contiguous staked claims, comprising

approximately 736 hectares (Figure 2). A list of the claims is found in Table 1

below.

Table 1

Long Lake property Claims List

Township/Area Claim Recording Claim Due Units Work otal Total Claim Number Date Date Required APplied Reserve Bank

MCBEAN LAKE 3015317 2004-Jun-14 2007 -Jul-29 10 $4,000 $0 $15 $0

MCBEAN LAKE 4221057 2007-Nov-23 2009-Nov-23 8 $3,200 $0 $0 $0

MCBEAN LAKE 1241540 2007-May25 2009-May-25 16 $6,400 0 0 0

MCBEAN LAKE 124 1541 2007-May25 2009-May-25 12 $4,800 0 0 0

2


/ /

" ~. ~--

.i'

/ ... .I'

(~~ '" 4\

1

I ~ .. 1 ~ ,

/ ~ ·W

~ Past and present prodJcing mines

r

_/

Long Lake Property

,

.~

Property Location Map

100

kilometres

3


PREVIOUS WORK

No historical assessment data for the immediate area of the property is recorded

before 1946. The Theresa Mine, located 5 kilometres to the northeast, produced

4,727 oz of gold and 198 oz of silver from 261,120 milled tons between 1935-1955.

Previous work is as follows:

1934-37

1934-38

1946

1947-49 1950-53

1954 1969

1970-72

1978

1987

1987-88

Initial gold discovery at the Theresa Mine site by Moses Fisher; optioned to Afton Mines Ltd., Bulk sampling, limited gold and silver production; 3,647 m of drilling; sinking of shafts 1 & 2; Theresa Mines Ltd. was incorporated, Independent Mining undertakes line-cutting; magnetic and geological surveys on the majority of the present day Long Lake property, Shaft #3 at Theresa Mine sunk to 155 m; 10 934 m of drilling, Theresa Mine Mill operated at 106 tons per day; Shaft #3 deepened to 300m; 2 071 m surface and 15 202 m of underground drilling, Theresa Mine operations halted; patents suspended, O. Albert carried out trenching and stripping on a claim north of Milbean Lake, Canadian Nickel Co. conducted a drill program in the McBean Lake area, Shell Canada Resources Ltd. optioned the property held by Roxmark Mines and Discovery West in the Skirmer-McBean Lake Area; Questor Surveys completed an AEM survey with ground magnetic and EM follow-up surveys; a nine hole, 1,026 m drill program followed, Areodat flew an AEM survey over a 186 claim group in the McBean Lake area for Discovery West Corp and Roxmark Mines; follow-up prospecting, ground mag and EM surveys; two holes, 180 m, were drilled south of Skinner Creek between Skinner Lake and Milbean Lake, Duration Mines optioned the Theresa Mine property and dewatered the workings; completed 5 320 m of underground drilling, Duration Mines

4

-------------------

o 4216845

-- ----,-

_0; /

4216860

-L- ___ _ _ _

422847

CLAIM MAP

Figure 2

~UIM l ...... l.("I""'21Io<~l

kilometres


1996

1997

2004 2006

2007

declared bankruptcy; the mine contractor, J.S. Redpath gained ownership of the property as compensation, Cyprus Canada Inc. staked the original fifteen-claim block in June followed by 23 km of line cutting between Nov and Dec. An additional 12.34 km of lines were cut plus 35 km's of a mag-VLF surveying were completed in January and February. A 27-km poledipole array IP survey was completed between Feb and Mar. An eleven hole, 1,851 metre BQ reconnaissance scale drill program was completed during the months of March and April. Seventy-four kilometre's of line for Grid B were cut between June and August. Line cutting was accompanied by a 58.9 kilometre mag/VLF survey. Geological mapping was completed in August. A 13.7 km pole-dipole array IP survey was completed during August. A 10 drill hole, 1,656 meter BQ diamond drill program was conducted by Cyprus Canada Inc. between October 7th and 27th, 1997 Andrew A. Tims staked two claims on June 9th, 2004 A sampling program of 50 liB" horizon and 50 Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) media was undertaken by Andrew A. Tims on old grid lines on the property. Two additional claims were staked on May 5th and 6th, 2007 for Andrew A. Tims by Sky Bridge Development.

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Geraldton Gold camp is underlain by the east-southeast striking sediment-

volcanic Barton Bay synclinorium. The sediments are comprised of Precambrian

turbidite assemblages with interbeds of banded iron formation and lesser mafic

volcaniclastic rocks of the Southern Sedimentary unit (Kresz & Zayachivsky, 1991).

Semi-conformable sills of diorite/gabbro, including quartz and quartz-feldspar

porphyry intrude these formations. The sediments/volcanics and intrusives have

been deformed into tight large and small-scale isoclinal folds. Later intrafold and

drag folds have been superimposed on these structures. To the north, the

synclinorium is bound by a sequence of mafic volcanic flows and to the south by a

major east-southeast tectonic structure known as the Barton Bay deformation zone

(BBDZ). See Fig 3.

Several major longitudinal faults trend east-southeast, roughly parallel the axial

planes of the fold structures. These faults have been offset by the southwest trending

6


Long Lake fault producing a horizontal offset of 1 kilometre and a significant

displacement in the vertical sense. Rocks to the east of this fault are from a deeper

crustal level with a metamorphic grade of upper greenschist to amphibolite.

Lithologies west of Long Lake are of greenschist facies (Kresz & Zayachivsky, 1991).

Mary of the gold deposits in the Geraldton camp are thought to be spatially related

to the low angle splays off of the BBDZ (Bankfield-Tombill fault), as the majority of

the gold production occurs in rocks directly north of this major tectonic structure.

Gold mineralization occurs in several environments but the two most prolific, based

on historical production (Pye, 1951), are the porphyry/sediment contacts and

quartz-ankerite veins within or adjacent to highly folded sections of iron formation.

Between 1934 and 1968, the Geraldton camp produced approximately 2.9 million

ounces of gold at an average grade of 0.17 oz/ton from eleven, moderate to high

grade underground operations. Production statistics for the Geraldton camp are

Ested in Table 2.

Table 2 Mine Production Statistics, Geraldton, Ontaiio

MINE PERIOD TONS AU OZ. AU OZIT PROD. RATE 1. Macleod Cockshutt 1938-67 9404145 1 366404 0.15 500-1 000 2. little Lon lac 1934-53 1 780516 605449 0.34 250 3. Mosher 1962-66 2710657 330265 0.13 NA 4. Hardrock 1938-51 1 458375 269081 0.18 200-500 5. Ma net Consolidated 1938-51 359912 152089 0.42 100 6. Consolidated Mosher 1967-68 934084 109324 0.12 1000 7. Tombill 1838-42 190622 69120 0.36 100 8. Bankfreld 1937-42 231 009 66417 0.29 100 9. Jellex 1939-40 14722 5672 0.39 45 10. Theresa 1950-55 26120 4727 0.15 106 11. Talmora 1948 6634 1 417 0.21 50

TOTALS 193'4-68 17102074 2974293 I III

7

- - -- - -LEGEND

Mafic Vol Felsic Vol Sedimet Feldspar Porph Qtz-Fsp Porph

• Gabbro • Tronj, Syenite

Granite, Granodiorite

• Diabase

• Mineral Occurance

1 Historical Drill Hole

...,., Iron Formation

- - - -." --f

ABREY TWP I

- - - - - - - - -, r-::;;-

.~~~"~

~H· .. " I

/

-"D ""'-- " _ " =.L-.

LONG LAKE PROPERTY

1----/ REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAP

kilometres


WORK PROGRAM SUMMARY

C. Shaw assisted by F. Blair undertook a soil survey on 3 old cut lines (C,W &Wll)

established by Cyprus Canada Inc., west of Milbean Lake (see Map 1). Aside from

CPS positions, the relict lines Cyprus Canada Inc. established were used as

additional reference during the work program (see Figure 4). All of the samples

were collected on claim TB1241540.

June 3

June 4

JuneS

June6

1/2 day travel to Long Lac Ontario from Thunder Bay, Ontario;

Soil sampled partly along line W & C;

Soil sampled line Wand Wll;

1/2 day travel to Thunder Bay Ontario from long Lac, Ontario;

A soil survey composed of 33 liB" horizon soils was conducted. A total of three

survey lines spaced 100 and 200 m apart, totalling 800 m were traversed. Quality

assurance and control of the geochemical data involved taking a duplicates and the

insertion of a blank sample at the south end of each line.

Samples were taken every 25 m using a hand soil auger. Soil samples were taken

below the lowermost organic layer, with the depth below the 1/ A-B' interface

recorded. B horizon material consisted of yellow to orange to orange-red to light

brown to brown to dark brown mineral soit immediately beneath any grey oxidized

horizon.

Samples were placed into paper soil bags, except for the last ten taken which were in

whirlpack bags. Data collected included: sample number, sample location in both

grid as well as UTM coordinates, altitude, depth, vegetation type, colour, sample

type, topography, slope direction, texture, plus a section for noting comments or

cultural features.

9


Soil samples were delivered by the Andrew Tims to Accurassay Laboratories in

Thunder Bay.

The B horizon samples were dried, and screened through -80 mesh. The -80 portion

is fired in the assay lab. In the fire assay lab, the sample is mixed with a lead based

flux and fused for an appropriate length of time. The fusing process results is a lead

button, which is then placed in a cupelling furnace where aU of the lead is absorbed

by the cupel and a silver bead, which contains any gold, platinum and palladium, is

left in the cupel. The cupel is removed from the furnace and allowed to cool. Once

the cupel has cooled sufficiently, the silver bead is digested using a 1:3 ratio of nitric

acid to hydrochloric acid. The samples are bulked up with 1.0 mls of distilled de

ionized water and 1.0 mls of 1 % digested lanthanum solution. The total volume is

3.0 mls. The samples cool and are vortexed. The contents are allowed to settle. Once

the samples have settled they are analyzed for gold, platinum and palladium using

atomic absorption spectroscopy. The atomic absorption spectroscopy unit is

calibrated for each element using the appropriate ISO 9002 certified standards in an

air-acetylene flame. A control sample with a known gold value and a blank is sent

through the instrument with each batch of samples. The following elements were

determined by ICP analysis; CUI Cd, Pb, Zn, Co, Ni, Y, Ba, Til Ca, Mg, AI, Li, Fe, As,

Sb, Bi, TI, W, Sn, Mo, Ag, B, K, Be, V, Na, Mn, PI Se, Cr, and Si were the elements

analyzed from the B horizon soils.

10

-------------------2008 Soil Sample Data

SampleNum UTME UTMN Depth (em) Vegetation Colour Horizon Topography Texture Comments Au (ppb) C-25 531507 5499840 45 spruce yellow B flat silt damp <5 C-50 531510 5499860 15 spruce birch ash brown B flat sand damp <5 C-75 531513 5499900 30 spruce yellow B flat silt wet <5 C-100 531516 5499921 30 spruce dark brown B flat silt wet <5 C-125 531519 5499949 61 spruce red brown B flat silt wet <5

C-150 531520 5499977 45 spruce red brown B silt wet <5 W-25 531297 5499857 61 spruce iyellow B flat silt moist <5 W-50 531299 5499882 30 ash spruce Iyellow brown B flat silt moist <5 W-75 531302 5499906 30 spruce ash bog Iyellow B flat clay damp 7 W-100 531304 5499931 15 spruce birch dark brown B flat sand moist <5 W-125 531306 5499955 15 spruce alder bog yellow orange B flat sand moist <5 W-150 531309 5499980 30 spruce bog !yellow brown B flat sand moist <5 W-175 531311 5500005 81 spruce bog dark brown B flat sand wet <5 W-200 531316 5500029 91 birch spruce Iyellow brown B flat sand moist <5 W-225 531318 5500054 45 spruce ash Iyellow brown B flat sand moist <5 W-250 531321 5500079 30 birch spruce Iyellow brown B flat sand damp <5 W-275 531323 5500104 15 alder brown B flat sand damp <5 W-300 531325 5500130 15 ash spruce red brown B flat sand damp <5 WII-25S 531192 5499796 15 birch ash spruce Iyellow brown B slope-SE sand damp <5 WI I-50S 531194 5499821 8 ash spruce brown B flat sand damp <5 WIl-O 531195 5499853 18 ash spruce brown B slope-S sand moist <5 WII-25 531197 5499874 61 spruce ash brown B flat sand damp <5 WII-50 531198 5499902 76 spruce ash dark brown B flat sand moist <5 WII-75 531200 5499929 30 brown B sandy silt damp <5 WII-100 531201 5499955 15 ash spruce brown B flat sandy silt damp <5

WII-125 531203 5499982 15 cedar spruce brown B slope-NE sand moist <5 WII-150 531204 5500008 30 cedar brown B slope-E sandy silt moist <5 WII-175 531206 5500035 81 ash spruce Iyellow brown B slope-NE sandy silt moist <5 WII-200 531208 5500062 91 spruce birch lyellow brown B slope-NE sand wet <5 WII-225 531209 5500088 45 ash Iyellow brown B slope-S sand wet <5 WII-250 531211 5500115 50 spruce ash red brown B slope-N sand damp <5 WII-275 531212 5500141 15 spruce birch red brown B flat sand damp <5 WII-300 531214 5500168 15 spruce red brown B flat sand damp <5

Page 1 Skinner_Soil_Data_200B.xls


Data Display

Sample locations are shown on Map 1 with tabulated field notes in Table 3 above.

Assay certificates are located in Appendix 2. Figure 4 includes historical humus and

soil data. For purposes of statistical analysis gold assay values below detection

limit of 5 ppb were given a default value of 2.5.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Previous drilling by Cyprus Canada Inc just to the southwest of this work program

intersected 1.98 g/t Au over 7.3 m in hole SK97-04, 0.58 g/t Au over 5.4 metres in

hole SK97-09 and 1.87 g/t Au over 6.5 metres in hole SK97-10 over a total strike

length of 175 m.

Gold results for the "B" Horizon soils are shown on Map 1 and compared with

humus results in Figure 4 as graduated symbols. The present survey was designed

to test the northwest continuation of gold trends picked up in 2007 soil sampling.

The results indicate no such trends exist.

Further work on Long Lake property should include:

1) Drill testing of the known auriferous mineralization down dip, down

plunge and along strike where indicated by the soil survey should be

conducted.

Drill Testing. 1500 m BQTK @$125/m 500 Assays @ $32/ sample Geologist +Tech 30 days @ $600/ day Field Costs 30 days @ $600 day

.$239500

12

- - - -I

Dtchtion 6" 15' W N I

I ,I ~ I ~

I " ~ I

I I 1 .. • 1 T . I: ..

- .- .- .- .~.-. •

•

TB421§§87

~

~

- -

, y .. T .. ~

~

f • ~

~ .- T

• • , •

•

- - -TB1241 540

T .-.- • ~ .-~

... , ~

~ ~ .. ~

I , ~

• TB301 $117

~

~

~

" •

~ ..

T f

~

~

" ~

• ~

T y ~

~ y

~

~

•

"

-

• •

•

"

- - - - - - - - -... ~ ...

:++-+~ !-+- ..... + .... .... ... ~-: .. !'~ ..... + ..... = .. + ... oW.

-!~!1-:+"" ... .......... ... .... ... ......... ... ... .... "" ...... ~-... ....

... "" ... y . ...

-.-++~~~~+.~~~+.++~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ - - - -

.: :: .. : ..... ~ .... ;:-!.:- .. ~ ~ • • • + •

"'*' • .. ................ -.--............. .. ~ ..... ...... .....

+ ............................... . ... ...

Milh.·QII Lnb-

f ... ...

~ ... ~

•

• T .. T ~

~

~

" •

T .. ~

~

•

•

-+-.... .- ... ...w. ...

~

~

"

~

•

•

2006 Sois · , • 05

0 1

1997 CYPfUS Solfs

• 14 7 14

1997 Cyprus Humus

• 5 2.5 05

2007 Soi. by Au

• 50 • 25

5

2008 SOU:.

· 50

• 25 5

HlStoflul On' CoIl8f t Tr.lC~

LONG l.AKE PROPERTY

GOLD GEOCHEMISTRY IN SOIL 8. HUMUS

,. . __ .. __ . __ . __ . __ . __ . __ . __ . __ ._-.--.--.--.--.--.----S.--.--. __ .....


REFERENCES Bajc, AF., 1998; A comparative analysis of enzyme leach and mobile ion selective

extractions; case studies from glaciated terrain, northern Ontario. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, vol 61, pp. 113-148.

Bruce, E.L., 1935; Little Long Lac Gold Area, Vol. XLIV, Part HI, Ontario Department of Mines Report

Kresz, D.U. and Zayachivsky, B., 1991; Precambrian geology, northern Long Lake area; Ontario Geological Survey, Report 273, 77 p.

MacDonald, AJ., 1988; The Geraldton Gold Camp: The role of Banded Iron Formation, Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5694, 173 p.

Mann, A W., Birrell, R.D., Mann, A.T., Humphreys, J.L., Perdrix, J.L., 1998; Application of mobile metal ion technique to routine geochemical exploration. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, Vol 61, pp. 87-102.

Pye, E.G., 1951; Geology of Errington Township, Little Long Lac Area, Vol. LX, Part VI; Ontario Department of Mines Report. 140p.

Wamtech Pty Ltd., 1996; MMI Operations Manual for Mobile Metal Ion Geochemical Soil Surveys. MMI Technology, Version 4.98

14


STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Andrew A. B. Tims, of 317 Sillesdale Cr., Thunder Bay Ontario hereby certify that:

1.) I am the co-author of this report.

2.)

3.)

4.)

I graduated from Carleton University, in Ottawa, with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology (1989).

I possess a valid prospector's license and have been practising my profession as a geologist involved in mineral exploration for the past 19 years.

I am a practising member of the Association of Professional Geoscientist of Ontario as well as a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

'I / .

. " / / ,

Thunder Bay, Ontario July 24, 2008

c>; //C{~Z( {~lf Andrew Tims Geologist Northern Mineral Exploration Services

15

I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX 1 - Soil Sample Location Map

I I I I I I I I 16

I

~---------------------------'-------------------------------'W~I~300+<

I Declination 6°15' W N

•

I •

I •

I •

I •

I •

I I • , •

/! I •

-------------------------TB4216BB7

T81241540

WI-275+ <5

WI-250+ <5

WI-225+ <5

W-300+ <5

W-275+ <5

W-250+ <5 WI-200+ <5 W-225+ <5

WI-175+ <5 W-200+ <5

WI-150 + <5 W-175+ <5

WI-125+ <5 W-150+ <5

WI-100 + <5 W-125 + <5

WI-75 + <5 W-100+ <5

WI-50+ <5 W-75 + 7 WI-25 + <5 W-50 + <5 WI-O + <5 W-25 + <5

WI-50S + <5

WI-25S+ <5

TB3015317

C-150 + <5

C-125 + <5

C-100+ <5 C-75+ <5

C-50+ <5 C-25 + <5

Sample' Ail (Ppb)

+ Soil Sample Location

Historical Drill Collar & Trace

NOTE: • 0(6 d.not .. below detection U~

LONG LAKE PROPERTY

0.. .-.. SOIL SAMPLE - LOCATION MAP ..... -'-: 1,S1IO ...-, 1.."T'Wz.totl t/WloDn ... ........ '

a so 100 200 i

metr ..

-

. _. --- - - - ---- - ---- - - - ---- - ---- - j

I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX 2 - Soil Assay Certificates

I I I I I I I I 17

I


Certificate of Analysis Wednesday July 2 2008

Tims, Andrew 317 Sillesdalea Cr. Thunder Bay, ON, CAN P7C1S7 FaX#: (807) 474-0875 Email#·[email protected]

Ace #

1S8611

158612

158613

158614

1S8615

158616

158617

158618 158619

158620 Dup

158621

158622

1S8623

158624

158625

158626

158627

158628

158629

158630

158631

158632

158633

158634

158635

PROCEDURE CODES AL4AU3 AL41CPAR

Client 10

C-25N

C-50N

C-7SN

C-l00N

C-12SN

C-1S0N

W-2SN

W-50N

W-75N

W-75N

W-100N

W-125N

W-1S0N

W175N

W-200N

W-225N

W-250N

W-27SN

ViI-300N

WI I-OS

WII-25S

Villi-50S

WII-2SN

Villi-SON

WII-75N

Certified

Derek Oemlaniuk H Sse. Laboratory Manager

Dalte F<eceived: Jun 12, 2008

Date Completed: Jul :~, 2008

Job #: 200841841

Heference:

Sample #: 33 Soil

Au ,I\u Au ppb az.lt gft (ppm)

<5 <0001 <O.OOS

<5 <0001 <0005

<S <0001 <ODDS

<5 <0 COl <0.005

<5 <0001 <O.OOS

<5 <0 COl <0.005

<5 <0001 <0 ODS

<5 <0001 <0.005

<5 <0001 <O.OOS

7 <0001 0007

<5 <0001 <OOOS

<5 <0 (101 <0.005

<5 <0001 <O.OOS

<5 <0001 <0005

<5 <0 001 <0005

<5 <0001 <0.005

<5 <0 (J01 <OOOS

<5 < 0 001 <0005

<S <0001 <0 DOS

<5 <0001 <0 DOS

<5 <0001 <0005

<5 <0001 <0005

<5 <0001 <0005

<5 <0 001 <OOOS

<5 <0 001 <0005

The results included on t:his report relate only to the items tested The Certificate o·r Analysis should not be reproduced except in full. without the written approval of the laboratory

AL903-0131-07/02/20081 27 PM

Page 1 01'.2


Certificate of Analysis Wednesday July 2 2008

Tims, Andrew 317 Smesdalea Cr Thunder Bay, ON, CAN P7C1S7 Fax#: (807) 474-0875 Email#·[email protected]

Ace #

158636 158637

158638 158639

158640 Dup

158641

158642

158643 158644 158645

PROCEDURE CODES Al4AU3, AL41CPAR

Chent ID

WII-l00N

W\!,125N

WI/-150N

WlI-175N

WII-17SN

WII-200N

WII-225N

\N\\·250N

W11-27SN

W!\-300N

Certified

By: ~_"_._....:::::;.... __ :::>

Derek Demianiuk H.Bsc LatlOratory Manager

Date Received. Jun 12, 2008 Date' Completed. Ju12,2008

Job # 200841841 Reference: Sample #: 33 Soil

Au Au Au ppb Qz1t gft (ppm)

<5 <0001 .::0005

<5 <0001 <0.005 <5 <0001 <0.005

<5 <0001 <0.005 <5 <0001 .::0.005

<5 <000"', <:0005

<5 <Q001 <0 005

<5 <0001 <0005 <5 <0001 <0005 <5 <0 001 <0005

The results ioclu,jed on this report relate::mly to the items tested The Certificate of Analysis should not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the ICiboratory

AL903·0131·07102120C8 1 27 PM

Page 201'2

- - - -

Tlms Andrew Date Created 08-07-03030750 PM Job Number 200841841 Date Received Jun 12. 2008 Number of Samples 33 Type of Sample SOli Date Completed Jui 2. 2008 PrOject 10

Accur II Chent f<lg

158611 C-25N 158612 C50N 158613 C-7SN 158614 C-,OON 15861::) C 125N

158616 C-150N 158617 W-25N '586 18 W-50N 158619 W-f':JN 158620 VV-75N 158621 W100N 158622 W-125N 158623 W 1S0N 15'3624 W-175N 158625 W-200N 158626 W·225N 15862 i W250N 158628 \,tV 275N 158629 V'nOON 158630 WII-OS 158631 W!J·25S 158632 WlI-50S

Aq

ppre

,1

,.1

063

Q 84

1 30

100

042

: 3B

C 94

o 5~

0'19

2 76

G

4

18

41

30

-'6 29

37

35

36

?A

39

44

45

',n 28

32

32

-

34

44

40

40

15

53

52

22

32

11

51

<1

-I

·1

-

4

4

t YO

1,1

} 34

91

094

o

J 3']

0 1 i

!J :)6

12

-

Cd Co C,

- - - - - - - - -

• The results Included on thiS report relate only to the Items tested , ThiS CertifIcate of AnalYSIS should not be reproduced except 111 full Without the written approval

of the laboratory 'The methoas used for these analysis are not accredited under ISO/lEe 17025

c, Fe K Mg Mn p Sb Se Sn

- -

TI V w in

flOIT' 00'11 PPO"! ppm pom pprT. opm f)i, ppm ppm ppm ppm pprr· ppm po"',,\ ppm ppm ppm npm ppm ppm

4

5

'.4 28

'V

n sO

32

36

29

14

lR

38

12

13

10

12

10

, 09 J4

'21 003 1S 024

1 54 Q 03 1()

i '( j J 0;7

1 50 005 ",,? 125 009 14 T34

, ":),) 0 19 1 04

1 43

, 68

(: 07

009 18

(j iF<

056

244

177

315

001

01 ·100

00: ~6 <\00

': 002 11

00; '5

..-1002 '1 <,-~OG

·<00

002 " <' 002 14 211

17 / 03 Q 09 19 04:- 26' D 01

12 007 1~ :t6 2D~ DOL 1.5

, '2 O} 11 124 007 10

094 003 018 <100 <1 001

/44

262

182

160

10 0 93 0 02 'J ') ~ lOr, '-' • '00

.ID J. 59 0 04 1 56 ,.1) 0, -lOa

lor ,-00' ·100

') C 03 22 e 51 ljT~ 001 40 <.100

Certified By/ /:' f It Derek Demlanluk H Bse

F.l

53

49

41

40

88

754 24

825 <1 "r:

..-t:, ,C; <:.10 824 '1

n [11 .1[' 686 ·1 52

~ '0 n02 "c 14?4 <1 81 <10

11 '7 4"' 'n

" ,~ 002 "0 ?F %9 31 ,10

02 'ie i.:.

< S <10 952

<:5 "'iO 15 897 <! 32

<; 2S 682 ,1 21

<5 "i) 0 02 10 ;';2 r)~ 25 <10

003 "0 588 <1 24 <10

-:-, 002 <'(J 5.24 24 ~-'"

,·10 :1 2219 ":'184 10

c5'5 '10 830" 29 <10

6'5 • 10 - 1 6~ i (j

11

8

4

36

56

40

29

31

59

25

Page 1 of 2

-

- - - -

Tlms Andrew Date Created 08-07-03030750 PM Job Number 200841841 Date Rece'ved "un 12 2008 Number of Samples 33 Type of Sample SOil !late Comoleted J,d 2 2008 Project ID

l\ccur # Client Tag

1~8633 WJi25N 158634 WII-50N '58535 W!I-''iN 158636 Will OON 158631 WI!-125N 1 ~8638 WII-150N '58639 W!I-17SN 158640 VVii175N 158641 WI1200N 1 b6642 Wii-225N 158643 WII-250N 158644 WII-275N 158645 WII-300N

Ag pprp

·-1

<1

<1

.,

AI

1 06

1 42

1 41

166

164

!)

3~

310

40

- -

Ca

o 6Y

88 144

54

004

- - - - - - - - - - - -

- The results Included on rhls report relate only to the ItemS tested - Th!s Cert!f1cate 01 An;:JIYSIS should not be reproduced except In full. Without the written approval

of the laboratory -The methods used for these analySIS are not accredited under ISOllEe 17025

Cd Co Cf Mg Mn Mo Na Pb Sb Se So Sr T, Ti V w y Zn

pDm ppm Dpn1 ppm ppm ppm Dom npn' DPr'" 00'1' PPr:'1 ontn com oorn [lpm Dom opm ppm

·4

6

6

15~

~8

35

20

40

32

24

144

'4 186

16 ~:':;4 ::-'04 36 11)t. 247

F. :;E~ ()4 t) 1J piOO

12 . 16 OO~ 19 88" 300

296

22

:) 29

9 , 84 (l02

, t()

o 02 ~ HJ 40 1()

'253 ,1 3 7

0] dO • ?"il '".1 6L\

'19f, '4

18 34 'Q 9 -: ~ f; (}1 '! S;

~i H10 892 ·c

Il 56

100 62 ,,~ 002 .... 10 1104 • 1 ~:.: 10

Page 2 of 2

-

Documents

ASSESSMENT REPORT ON FOLLOW UP SOIL SAMPLING SURVEY · andrew tims, p.geo_ utm zone 16 -nad 83 projection 530930me,5499270mn july 24, 2008 ~ eived .1111282008 g!:o:c.~· ~> f, ssess~1ei~t