Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
1
1
Assignment 2
Katie King
16495021
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
2
2
HSC Quarantine Assessment Task
Part A. Independent research and instructional video
A.1 Video link
Outcomes (NSW Education Standards Authority [NESA], 2017):
BIO12-14 Analyses infectious disease in terms of disruption to homeostatic
mechanisms and the organism’s response, including the human
immune systems
Content (NESA, 2017):
Inquiry Question: How can the spread of infectious diseases be controlled?
• Investigate procedures that can be employed to prevent the spread of disease,
including but not limited to:
- Quarantine
Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXjNLqYiqh4&feature=youtu.be
A.2 Completed Lecture Module Activities
A.2.1 Week 6 Lecture Activity
One area of the HSC syllabus that I believe requires particularly good
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) is the area of adaption and natural selection.
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
3
3
Students can develop fundamental misconceptions in this area of science that can
greatly affect their understanding of the basic concept of adaptation and the method
by which adaptation occurs. One pedagogical method I would use to develop student
knowledge in this area is that of role-playing and student activity. Students would
leave the classroom environment to engage in an activity whereby they act as a
predator to capture ‘prey’ in the form of coloured toothpicks that either blend in or
stand out against the surrounding environment. By linking the colours of the
toothpicks to animal adaptations, this activity would provide students with a personal
experience they can utilise to build their knowledge regarding the concept of
adaptations.
A.2.2 Week 7 Lecture Activity
Task answers:
1. One finding of the study that resonated with me with regards to Biology was
the results of the resources and planning section. An interesting aspect of the
results was that teachers placed importance on the creation of resources
separate from textbook learning. Similar to some teachers in the study, I
believe student engagement can be achieved through classroom discussions
and tasks based around current topics students have prior knowledge about
(i.e. subjects that are topical in media). This is particularly important in the
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
4
4
content rich topic of Biology, where student relevance can assist students to
link subject ideas to real world examples.
2. The finding informs the way I would approach teaching in that I need to
develop methods of staying current with topical subjects in media relevant to
science, or find ways to link topical subjects to science.
Reply to discussion:
I agree that taking the time to learn student interests and incorporating these
interests into lessons is an effective method of forming positive relationships with
students. By doing this, students being to recognise that their opinions, interests and
any questions they may raise in class are valued by the teacher.
A.2.3 Week 8 Lecture Activity
Last name King
First name Katie
Type of resource Virtual lab
Name of resource Cell structure
URL https://www.explorelearning.com/index.cfm?method=cResourc
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
5
5
e.dspView&ResourceID=450
Resource
description
This virtual lab allows students to explore the structure of
animal and plant cells. The simulation allows students to
visualise different cell organelles and are provided information
regarding their structure and function.
Brief lesson
description
The simulation could be used to allow students to build
knowledge of cell structures of both plant and animal cells,
observing differences between the two. Students could also use
the visualisations to differentiate cell organelles by their
structure and link to function.
HSC Biology
module: Provide
name and number
Module 1 - Cells as the basis of life
Content dot points
within module
Inquiry question: What distinguished on cell from another?
Students: investigate a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell
structures, including but not limited to: - drawing scaled
diagrams of a variety of cells, - comparing and contrasting
different cell organelles and arrangements, - modelling the
structure and function of the fluid mosaic model of the cell
membrane.
Part B. Assessment task
Outcomes (NESA, 2017):
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
6
6
BIO12-14 Analyses infectious disease in terms of disruption to homeostatic
mechanisms and the organism’s response, including the human
immune systems
BIO11/12-4 Selects and processes appropriate qualitative and quantitative data and
information using a range of appropriate media
BIO11/12-6 Solves scientific problems using primary and secondary data, critical
thinking skills and scientific processes
BIO11/12-7 Communicates scientific understanding used suitable language and
terminology for a specific audience or purpose
Content (NESA, 2017):
Inquiry Question: How can the spread of infectious diseases be controlled?
• Investigate procedures that can be employed to prevent the spread of disease,
including but not limited to:
- Quarantine
• Describe a variety of infectious diseases caused by pathogens, including
microorganisms, macroorganisms and non-cellular pathogens, and collect
primary and secondary-sourced data and information relation to disease
transmission
B.1 Scaffold of student learning
Prior to the assessment task, students would have completed the Inquiry
questions “How are diseases transmitted?” “How does a plant or animal respond to
infection?” and “How does the human immune system respond to exposure to a
pathogen?” (NESA, 2017, pg. 51) to attain background knowledge regarding
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
7
7
infectious disease, transmission methods and vectors, significance of studying disease
through societal effects and organisms responses to infection. Students would be
taught the metalanguage of disease, specifically focussing on the terms ‘symptom’,
‘treatment’, ‘transmission’, ‘direct contact’ and ‘indirect contact’, as well as
‘bacteria’, ‘virus’, ‘fungi’ and ‘prion’. Students would study various infectious
pathogens and use these terms to compare diseases in terms of causal factors, spread
and human responses. Subsequent to this, student learning would focus on
preventative measures to infectious disease. Students would compare methods of
prevention including vaccinations, quarantine, hygiene and public health campaigns,
as per the syllabus (NESA, 2017, pg. 52). During this instruction, students would
explicitly contrast the terms prevention and treatment, in order to understand
treatment occurs after someone has become infected, whereas prevention occurs in
order to stop someone becoming infected. Students would be asked to justify why
preventative measures are important to improve understanding of impact of disease on
society. To introduce students to the subject of quarantine specifically, students would
watch the above instructional video to gain a general understanding of the topic.
Students would then be asked to research instances where quarantine has been
effective in preventing the spread of disease. Students would also participate in an
excursion to explore Quarantine Station in Sydney. This would help students visualise
a historical quarantine station for the purposes of their assignment.
In relation to the task requirement to design of a quarantine station, students
would be exposed to design methodology at various points throughout the HSC
syllabus. Students would be asked to create models of biological phenomena. Student
confidence in design in general would be built during the design of practical
investigations throughout the unit. If students are not confident building or drawing a
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
8
8
floor plan of their quarantine station, they may create a video to describe how they
would set up their quarantine station. This would favour students with higher literacy
and communication skills. Scaffolds to assist the creation of a video would include
the earlier provision of a written set of instructions to describe the editing process.
B.2 Document of instructions
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
9
9
BIOLOGY Stage 6 HSC Course
Assessment Task No. 3 Task Weight: 30 %
Module 7: Infectious Disease Quarantine Station:
Group Research and Design Problem-Based Task
Student Name:
Teacher:
Date of Issue: Friday 14th June 2019 Due of Submission: Friday 19th July 2019 Declaration
• I declare, to the best of my knowledge, this submission is all my own work and does not contain material previously published, except where acknowledgement has been made.
• I have read and understood the NESA Rules and Procedures for Higher School Certificate Candidates booklet
• I declare I have a copy of this original assignment, or legible photographic evidence, in my possession.
• I am aware I will received a mark of zero if the task is submitted late unless an appeal and doctor’s certificate is approved.
• I am aware that any work that exceeds 10% above the word/time limitations will not be marked. Student signature: _________________________ Date: ____________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HSC Assessment Task No. 3 Receipt of Submission
Student Name: _____________________________
Date Due: ____________________ Date Submitted: ___________________
Teacher Name: __________________ Teacher Signature: __________________
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
10
10
Outcomes
BIO12-14 Analyses infectious disease in terms of disruption to homeostatic
mechanisms and the organism’s response, including the human immune
systems
BIO11/12-4 Selects and processes appropriate qualitative and quantitative data and
information using a range of appropriate media
BIO11/12-6 Solves scientific problems using primary and secondary data, critical
thinking skills and scientific processes
BIO11/12-7 Communicates scientific understanding used suitable language and
terminology for a specific audience or purpose
Task Description
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has been monitoring an outbreak of Black Plague
in Malaysia. They have advised countries to increase border defence against disease to
prevent further spread. The New South Wales Government has commissioned a number
of organisations, your group of scientists and architects included, to design a quarantine
station to be built at Sydney Airport.
You are to work in Groups of 3 to conduct research regarding Black Plague symptoms,
transmission and treatment, the concept of quarantine and features of quarantine stations.
You are then to design a quarantine station for an airport. This station can be either a
permanent structure or a quickly assembled structure to be used when necessary (you
must justify your decision in your presentation). You may design your quarantine station by
creating ONE of the following:
• A labelled 3D model of your station (choose an appropriate size for class
presentation)
• A labelled floor plan/map of your station, either computer or hand drawn (choose an
appropriate size for class presentation)
• A video explaining the features of your station (5-7 minutes in length)
You must present your research as a PowerPoint presentation to the class (5-7 minutes in
length). Your presentation must include aspects of Black Plague (including symptoms,
transmission and treatment) and link these concepts to the importance of quarantine. You
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
11
11
must use your 3D model or floor plan to present the ideas behind your quarantine station
to the class, explain features incorporated in your station, and justify decisions made
during the design process using your research about the disease and the features of
quarantine. NOTE: if you choose the video option, your justifications must be included in
the video; your class presentation will focus solely on aspects of swine flu.
In your design, you should consider:
- Quarantine/isolation levels
- Filtration
- Sterilisation
- Decontamination
- Hospital ward for quarantined patients
- Triage ward for testing patients
- Outgoing waste systems
- Personal protection strategies
- Administration area for records
What to submit
As a group, you must submit your quarantine station design (either a hard copy of your
design or a USB with your video, depending on your choice of medium). You must also fill
in and submit the attached document, stating contributions of each group member to the
task. Attach the group contributions sheet (1 copy) to your groups signed cover sheets (1
for each member). Each group member will receive a receipt of submission when the task
has been accepted.
Referencing
You are to provide a complete reference list (with a minimum of 3 references) at the end of
your assignment using APA referencing style, as per previous instruction.
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
12
12
Group Member Contributions to the task
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
13
13
B.3 Marking guide
Criteria Limited Basic Sound High Outstanding
Describe microorganism resulting in disease and the consequent human reaction (BIO12-14; BIO11/12-4)
Recalls limited knowledge and has elementary understanding of cause and effect of infectious disease
Recalls basic knowledge and understanding of cause and effect of infectious disease
Demonstrates sound knowledge and clear understanding of cause and effect of disease
Demonstrates thorough knowledge and understanding of cause of effect of disease
Demonstrates an extensive knowledge and understanding of cause and effect of infectious disease
Discuss the transmission of the disease and relate transmission to the significance of quarantine measures and pandemics (BIO12-14; BIO11/12-4)
Provide, using simple qualitative data, the transmission of the infectious disease
Provide, using, fundamental qualitative data, the transmission of the infectious disease and provide some link to quarantine measure
Provides, using qualitative data, the transmission of the infectious disease and explain links to quarantine measures
Explain, using qualitative data, the transmission of the infectious disease and coherently link to concepts of quarantine measures
Analyses and evaluates data regarding transmission of the infectious disease and link to concepts of quarantine measures
Synthesis and justify a quarantine station layout/explanation, explaining relevant design features (BIO11/12-4; BIO11/12-6)
Identifies and applies knowledge and information of scientific concepts to plan a quarantine station
Identifies and applies knowledge and information of scientific concepts to plan a quarantine station and fundamentally justifies design
Generally discusses and applies knowledge and information of scientific concepts to plan a quarantine station and frequently justifies design
Correctly discusses and applies knowledge and information of scientific concepts to plan a quarantine station and effectively justifies design
Correctly and extensively discusses knowledge and information of scientific concepts to plan a quarantine station and succinctly and logically justifies design
Clearly communicates presented information using appropriate scientific language (BIO11/12-7)
Communicates using fundamental written/verbal expression, using general biological terms occasionally, and graphics where appropriate
Communicates uses fundamental written/verbal expression, using some general biological terms correctly, and graphics where appropriate
Communicates using clear written/verbal expression, using general biological terms frequently and correctly, and graphics where appropriate
Communicates effectively, using precise biological terms frequently and correctly, and graphics where appropriate
Communicates succinctly, logically and sequentially, using precise biological terms extensively and correctly, and graphics where appropriate
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
14
14
B.4 Expected learning from task
By completing the assignment, students will present either a three-dimensional
model of a floor plan, a 2D floor plan (either hand drawn or computer generated) or a
video describing a plan for a quarantine station. In order for students to complete this
task they must research and understand concepts of quarantine including levels of
quarantine and isolation, treatment facilities, filtration systems, sterilisation,
decontamination and personal protection. Student critical thinking and problem
solving skills must then be used to create a logical design for their station. The
assessment therefore assists in the building of problem-solving and critical thinking
skills, which are considered to be critical skills to learn for student ongoing success
(Kandemir & Gür, 2009).
Students must also justify their decisions regarding their station with specific
reference to the spread of disease. Students must demonstrate an understanding of the
scientific terminology associated with infectious disease. In particular should consider
modes of transmission, and relate this back to the overall topic of quarantine. Students
must also understand concepts of societal impacts of disease in order to justify their
quarantine structure. This would specifically be discussed during the justification of
the type of structure they design (i.e. a permanent structure or quick build temporary
structure).
Part C. Justification
The instructional video and assessment task incorporate a range of different
pedagogical strategies in their conception. In particular, the strategies of technology,
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
15
15
logical information presentation and visualisation in instructional videos, as well as
students choice and differentiation, drawing and scaffolds in assessment will be
addressed.
The information presented in Part A acts as background information to assist
basic student comprehension of quarantine for further class-based discussion (Chan,
2010). The information is concisely grouped into a logical sequencing pattern. By
grouping relevant information together, the cognitive load required to process the
information is reduced, allowing students to more easily process the material (Chan,
2010). The presentation of information in video format also further assists the
lowering of cognitive load by allowing students to engage with the medium in a way
best suited to their learning needs (Chan, 2010; Forbes et al., 2016). By adding
visualisations, the presentation also assists students to visualise and understand
concepts of quarantine. In particular, the video includes a map of North Head
Quarantine station in order to demonstrate the vastness of the area and make students
realise the large undertaking quarantine can be. Also the incorporation of a
visualisation of an air filtration system allows students to more readily visualise how
filtration works.
The assessment task requires students to design a quarantine station by
building knowledge and understanding of aspects and concepts involved in quarantine
stations prior to planning a floor map that incorporates their researched features. The
task was designed to avoid traditional question and answer assessment style. This
follows recent trends diverging from conventional assessment (Lee, Lin & Tsai,
2013). Furthermore, the design nature of the task and the requirement of students to
justify their product, means that students must use their research, knowledge and
critical thinking skills to solve a problem (the need for an airport quarantine base).
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
16
16
This higher skill set is an important aspect of the assessment task as it promotes
cognitive development through challenge-based learning (Siegal Wisseher &
Halverson, 2008). By using this representation of scientific ideas in conjunction with
a real world scenario, students demonstrate their ability to use inquiry-based, goal-
orientated learning to solve problems (Quellmalz et al., 2012; Van Meter et al. 2006).
Furthermore, research suggests that the incorporation of pictorial
representations into higher order tasks can positively impact student outcomes (Van
Meter et al., 2006). In essence, by creating a quarantine station plan, students generate
a visual representation of their textual-based research (Van Meter et al., 2006). The
process of generating this visual representation assists student cognitive organisation
of conducted research, resulting in increased student outcomes (Van Meter et al.,
2006). This aspect of the assessment could particularly help low literacy and EAL/D
students engage with the task. The assessment task, however, does not ignore diverse
classroom in which some students may not be design or drawing-orientated learners.
For students who are more literacy orientated, the option exists to create an ICT based
resource to promote or sell their design, using descriptions and explanations of the
features and concepts of quarantine they have incorporated. By explicitly stating that
these students must present their knowledge in video format, teachers are encouraging
the development of ICT skills as well as creative thinking.
There has been a recent increase in the use of learner-centred education, which
has permeated into the area of assessment (Lee et al., 2013). Research has indicated
that lack of choice in educational settings can reduce student outcomes and therefore
have a negative effect on the learning experiences of students (Hennessy et al., 2010).
The use of choice in the assessment task, therefore allows learners to more readily
engage with the task (Waters, Smeaton & Burns, 2004). This differentiation means
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
17
17
that teachers are assessing the same outcomes for all students, while allowing for
equality due to diverse needs during the assessment (Siegal et al., 2008).
Scaffolds are a key feature of assessment tasks in order to direct and support
students (Siegal et al., 2008). The assessment task is scaffolded in that it provides
students with specified information regarding topics that should be included in their
submission. By providing students with a list of topics relating to quarantine and
features of quarantine stations, teachers can effectively guide student thinking (Siegal
et al., 2008). The marking guide is also scaffolded for students in that the outcome
syllabus reference numbers have been connected to the criteria. This allows students
to link terminology from the marking guide to syllabus based required outcomes. This
was done, as research suggests that in order to improve student learning during
assessment tasks, students must be explicitly aware of the outcomes required of them.
This can assist students to focus their learning (Fenhsam & Cumming, 2013).
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
18
18
References
NSW Education Standards Authority. (2017). NSW syllabus for the Australian
curriculum: Biology Stage 6 syllabus. NSW Government. Retrieved from
http://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au
Chan, Y. M. (2010). Video instructions as support for beyond classroom learning.
Procedia Social and Behavioural Science, 9(1), 1313-1318. doi:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.326
Fensham, P. J. & Cumming, J. J. (2013). “Which Child Left Behind”: Historical
issues regarding equity in science assessment. Education Sciences, 3(3), 326-
343. doi: 10.3390/edusci3030326
Forbes, H., Oprescu, F. I., Downer, T., Phillips, N. M., McTier, L., Lord, B., Barr, N.,
Alla, K., Bright, P., Dayton, J., Simbag, V. & Visser, I. (2016). Use of videos
to support teaching and learning of clinical skills in nursing education: A
review. Nurse Education Today, 42(1), 53-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.010
Hennessy, E., Hernandez, R., Kieran, P. & MacLoughlin, H. (2010). Teaching and
learning across disciplines: student and staff experiences in a newly
modularised system. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 675-689. doi:
10.1080/13562517.2010.507301
Kandemir, M. A. & Gür, H. (2009). The use of creative problem solving scenarios in
mathematics education: views of some prospective teachers. Procedia Social
and Behavioural Sciences, 1(1), 1628-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.286
Lee, M., Lin, T. & Tsai, C. (2013). Proving or improving science learning?
Understanding high school students’ conceptions of science assessment in
Taiwan. Science Education, 97(2), 244-270. doi: 10.1002/sce.21046
16495021: ASSIGNMENT 2
19
19
Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D. & Buckley, B. S. (2012). Science
assessments for all: Integrating science simulations into balanced state science
assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363-393.
doi: 10.1022/tea.21005
Siegal, M. A., Wissehr, C. & Halverson, K. (2008). Sounds like success: A
framework for equitable assessment. The Science Teacher, 75(3), 43-46.
Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au
Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A. & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated
drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 31(2), 142-166. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.04.001
Waters, F. H., Smeaton, P. S. & Burns, T. G. (2004). Action research in the secondary
science classroom: Student response to differentiated, alternative assessment.
American Secondary Education, 32(3), 89-104. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au