Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
q. Golder Associates Md. 220 - 1755 Springfield Road Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada V1Y 5V5 Telephone (250) 860-8424
P.O. Box 307 Keremeos, British Columbia VOX 1NO
Attention: Art and Elsie Friesen
RE: PROOF OF WATER - LOT#I AND LOT#2, PART OF LOT B, SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 52, SIMILKAMEEN DIVISION YALE DISTRICT, PLAN 32785, KEREMEOS, BRlSTlSH COLUMBIA
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Friesen:
Golder Associates Ltd. (Golder) is pleased to submit this letter report presenting the results of pumping tests and water quality assessment (proof of water) conducted for two lots near Keremeos, B.C. (Figure 1). The legal description for the properties are Lot#l and Lot#2, part of Lot B, Section 20, Township 52, Similkameen Division Yale District (SDYD) Plan 32785 (Figure 2) (herein referred to as Lot#l and Lot#2). It understood that the lots are being subdivided and a "proof of water" is required by the Regional District of Osoyoos-Similkameen (RDOS) for both domestic groundwater supply wells. Written authorization to proceed with this assessment was provided by Mr. Art Freisen on August 7,2002.
According to Roza Alywin of the RDOS, Bylaw No. 300 (Section 4) is applicable to the site in regards to water supply issues. The requirements for the water wells are as follows:
Each parcel must be 9,000 f t2 (840 m2 or 0.2 acres) in area.
A well must be drilled for each parcel of the proposed subdivision.
All wells must be constructed to prevent surface water from entering the well and shall be provided with a cover made of reinforced concrete or met
50 -yui \ r :
i O\iPil i.\
OFFICES ACROSS NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH AMERICA, EUROPE, ASIA, AUSTRALASIA
W Art and Elsie Friesen I- August 21,2002
- 2 - 022-4 140
All wells must be capable of delivering water at a rate of not less than 3 Imperial gallons per minute (Igpm) (13.6 Wmin).
A water sample must be collected from each well and determined to be potable according to B.C. Drinking Water Quality Standards.
All testing and reports must be certified by a professional hydrologist or groundwater geologist.
1.0 BACKGROUND
The lots are located on the east side of Highway 3A, approximately 3 km northeast of Keremeos, B.C. (Figure 1). The eastern portion of Lot B slopes steeply to the west, with the remaining property sloping gently towards the southwest. Keremeos Creek flows southward through Lot B.
Figure 2 outlines the proposed property subdivision of Lot#l and Lot#2 from Lot B. The area of each lot is approximately 2000 m2. There are two existing wells on Lot#l, a well near the shop on the northern portion of the property (not tested in this investigation) and a second well located near the calf hutches and shop on the southern portion of the property (herein referred to as Well#l). Well#l supplies water for the house on Lot#l and drinking water for the livestock. The well on Lot#2 (herein referred to as Well#2) is located in the northeastern corner of the property and supplies water for the house on this property and some irrigation use.
Both wells are located in a sheltered well house, with an elevated concrete floor surrounding the well and a sealed plastic cover, preventing surface water from entering the wells.
Well#lwas drilled on May 22, 2000 by Cyclone Drilling of Kelowna, B.C. According to the well logs (attached to this report), subsurface conditions at this well consisted of clay with sand, gravel, cobbles and/or boulders to approximately 16 m. This was underlain by sand and gravel to a depth of 21 m and silty clay and sand to a depth of 23 m. The well contains a 15 cm (6-inch) diameter steel casing from ground surface and is screened from 19.2 m to 21.2 m. At the time of the well installation, the depth to water was 14.9 m depth. The recommended pump setting was at a depth of approximately 18.2 m, at an estimated flow rate was 151 Wmin (40 US gpm).
Golder Associates
w Art and Elsie Friesen
3 - ;jr August 2 1, 2002
022-4140
Well#2 was drilled on March 20, 1998 by Field Drilling Contractors Ltd. of Aldergrove, B.C. The well log for Well#2 (attached to this report) indicated silty sand and gravel were found to a depth of 12.2 m, underlain by sand and gravel to a depth of 16.8 m. The 15 cm diameter well was screened from 15.2 m to 16.9 m. According to the well log, the depth to water at the time of the well installation was 7.9 m. The recommended pump setting was at a depth of 14.9 m, at an estimated flow rate of 114 Wmin (30 US gpm).
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Aquifer Pumping Tests
To assess the well yield, a 2-hour pumping test was completed at each of the wells. The rationale for conducting a 2-hour pumping test (compared to longer duration pumping tests) were:
the well logs indicated that the wells were installed in unconfined, highly permeable materials and not bedrock, and
the Friesens indicated that the wells have been in use for the past 2 to 4 years, providing approximately 30+ gpm of water.
For these reasons, a 2-hour pumping test was conducted, with the option of extending the pump tests for a longer time period if the water levels were not a steady-state (Le., continuing to decrease) at the end of the 2-hour test.
The pumping tests and water sample collection was conducted by D. Atkinson of Golder on August 8, 2002. During the pump test, the following steps were conducted:
1. Static water levels were recorded in the wells prior to pumping.
2. Using the installed pumped, water was pumped out of each well at rate of approximately 19 L/min (4.2 Igpm) by opening a tap. It should be noted that the pump ran intermittently as required to recharge the pressure tank.
3. Water levels were recorded in each well during pumping.
4. Water levels were observed in each well during the well recovery following the completion of the aquifer pumping test.
Golder Associates
c Art and Elsie Friesen IrrS August 2 1,2002
4 - 022-4 140
Discharge from the wells was directed downgradient from the wells into nearby fields. The discharge rates were monitored regularly by measuring the time to fill a graduated pail and adjusted the flow rate as required. It should be noted that water use of the two wells was minimized for 24 hours prior to the pumping test. However, due to the use of the two wells for livestock watering and human consumption, some water use may have occurred prior and/or during the pumping test.
Upon the completion of the 2-hour pumping test, a water sample was collected on August 8, 2002 from each well and submitted to Cantest Analytical Laboratory of Burnaby, B.C for general potability, including fecal and total coliform analysis. The samples were delivered to Cantest by the following day and analyzed within the recommended holding time. The results of the water analyses were compared to the B.C. Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection (MWLAP) Drinking Water (DW) quality standards (from the Contaminated Sites Regulation) and the Canadian Drinking Water Quality (CDWQ) guidelines.
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Pumping Tests
Well# 1
The static water level in Well#l was observed to be 15.303 m below top of casing (btoc). The water levels during the 2-hour pumping test stayed constant while pumping at 19 L/min, with the water level not decreasing more than 2 cm while the pump was on. In general, the pump was on for a 2 min. interval every 5 min. to 10 min. to recharge the pressure tank. No recovery data was observed since the final water level immediately prior to stopping the pump test was 15.303 m btoc.
The static water level in Well#2 was observed to be 13.625 m btoc. Similar to Well#l, the water levels during the 2-hour pumping test did not decrease more than 5 cm while the pump was on. In general, the pump was on for a 2 min. interval every 5 min. to 10 min. to recharge to pressure tank. No recovery data was observed since the final water level immediately prior to stoppj.ng the pump test was 13.625 m btoc.
Golder Associates
w Art and Elsie Friesen August 2 1,2002
- 5 - 022-4 140
Based on the results of the 2-hour pumping tests, both wells appear to be capable of delivering at least 19 L/min (4.2 Igpm).
3.2 Chemical Analyses of Groundwater
The results of the chemical analyses of groundwater samples from the two wells are presented on the attached Table 1. The applicable MWLAP DW standards and the CDWQ guidelines are included fior reference.
The results indicated that the potability parameters met the MWLAP DW standards and the CDWQ guidelines, with the exception of total iron in Well#l. While the total (unfiltered) iron concentration, 10.53 mgL, in Well#l exceeded MWLAP and CDWQ standard of 0.3 mgL, the dissolved (filtered) iron concentration, 0.24 mg/L, was less than the drinking water standards. It should be noted the MWLAP specifies that the drinking water standards are for “unfiltered samples obtained at the point of consumption”, however the iron standards is based on aesthetic objectives rather than human health objectives. A water treatment system could be considered for Lot#l to reduce the total iron concentrations to meet the aesthetic iron standard.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of the aquifer pumping tests, Well#l and Well#2 are each considered capable of meeting the requirements of RDOS Bylaw No. 300 (Section 4) and delivering a minimum of 3 Igpm (13.6 Wmin), with both wells easily yielding 4.2 Igpm (19 Wmin) during the test. Although Golder was not present during the drilling and installation of the groundwater wells, both wells appeared to be constructed to prevent surface water from entering the well.
The results of chemical analyses of the groundwater indicate that all potability parameters met the BC MWLAP DW Standards and CDWQ guidelines, with the exception of total iron in Well#l. A water treatment system could be considered on Lot#l to reduce the total iron concentrations to meet the aesthetic iron standard.
Golder Associates
w Art and Elsie Friesen " August 21,2002
- 6 - 022-4140
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This letter report was prepared for the exclusive use of Art and Elsie Friesen and their representatives. Any use which a third party makes of this letter report, or any reliance on, or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibilities of such third parties. Golder accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this letter report. The Friesens have the right to submit this letter re:port to the Regional District of Osoyoos-Similkameen (RDOS) for review and comment. The RDOS may rely on the information contained in this letter report solely to carry out such a review and for the purposes of issuing approvals and/or certificates.
The letter report, which specifically includes all tables, figures attachments, and appendices, is based on data and information collected during the investigation conducted by Golder in August 2002. It provides a level of assurance commensurate with the level of study. The letter report is based solely on the site conditions encountered at the time of the field investigation, supplemented by data obtained by Golder Associates Ltd. as described in this letter report.
In evaluating the site, Golder has relied in good faith on information provided by the individuals and agencies noted in this letter report. We accept no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatements or inaccuracies contained in this letter report as a result of omissions, misinterpretations of .fraudulent acts of the persons or agencies interviewed.
This investigation was performed according to current professional standards and practices in the groundwater field.
Golder Associates
'Irrrr Art and Elsie Friesen - 7 -
'O$ August 21,2002 022-4140
6.0 CLOSURE
We trust this report provides you with the information you require at this time. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours very truly,
GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD.
Darlene Atkinson, M.Sc. Hydrogeologist
W. Scott Orth, M.Sc., P.Geo. Associate, Office Manager
Attachments DA/WSO/jmf N:\ACTIVE\4100\022-4140 FfUESEN - PROOF OF WATERWAL\RPT-0821-PROOF OF WATER.DOC
Golder Associates
August 2002 Table 'Lr 1 - Drinking Water Analytical Results w Well#l and Well#2, Friesen Properties, Keremeos, B.C.
Conventional Parameters Temperature, Field deg. C pH, Laboratory pH units Conductivity, Laboratory uS/cm True Color cu Turbidity NTU Hardness CaCO3 Total Dissolved Solids m g k Total Alkalinity CaC03 mg/L Bicarbonate Alkalinity HC03 mgL Carbonate Alkalinity C03 Hydroxide Alkalinity OH Dissolved Fluoride F
Nitrate and Nitrite N m g k Dissolved Chloride C1 m a
Dissolved Nitrate N m g k Nitrite N m g k Dissolved Sulphate SO4 mg/L Metals Analysis
Total Calcium Ca mgL Total Iron Fe m g 5 Total Magnesium Mg mgL Total Manganese Mn m g n Total Potassium K m g k
m a m a m g L m g h m g 5 m g k
,Dissolved Calcium Ca Dissolved Iron Fe Dissolved Magnesium Mg Dissolved Manganese Mn Dissolved Potassium K Dissolved Silicon Si02 Dissolved Sodium Na mgL Microbiological Analysis Total Coliform (Confirmed) C01./100 mL Fecal Coliform co1./100 mL
11.4 7.84 501 < 5 1.9 213 322 170 208 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.09 6.3 0.93 0.93
< 0.002 76.5
64.2 +'p"<-Y> I".#,**?
16.9 0.003 2.73
:$& &53;A%g
63.4 0.24 13.4
0.002 2.67 17
12.6
< 1 < 1
10.9 7.87 47 8 < 5 0.43 213 316 174 213 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.09 5.2 0.82 0.82
< 0.002 76.5
15 6.5 - 8.5
15 5
500
250
500
64.7 0.26 0.3 15.9
< 0.001 0.05 2.91 62.4 0.22 0.3 14
< 0.001 0.05 2.88 18.3 12.5 200
< 1 < 1
5
1.5
10 10 1
not detected not detected
022-4140
1.5 250 10 10 3.2
0.3 100 0.05
0.3 100 0.05
200
1. CDWQ - Canadian Drinking Water Quality Guidelines, Health Canada (1996). A 0 = Aesthetic Objective MAC = Maximum Acceptable Concentration
Regulation of the Waste Management Act B.C. Reg. 375196 (1996 with 2002 amendments). DW = Drinking Water Standards
2. BC MWLAP DW = British Columbia Ministry of Water Land and Air Protection Contaiminated Sites
3. Bold and shaded values indicates concentration exceeds the CDWQ and/or MWLAJ? Drinking Water Standard.
N:/Active/4100/4140/Lab Resultdwater resulkxls Golder Associates Page 1 of 1
1 :50,000 Figure 1 - Key Plan Proof of Water
Friesen Properties, Keremeos, British Columbia Golder Associates
.,. ,
.. .. ' . :., , . .+ - , ' . .
I
Figure 2 - Site Plan Proof of Water
Friesen Properties, Keremeos, British Columbia Golder Associates
P.0 Ban841 PhOCkr: (304) 857-2268 Fa: (604) 667-2267 __-- -- -... ,.-. -.- .......................... . .........
ALQERGRCIVE, B.C. V4W 2Vl ---*1.. ---.I, .. -.-.. . . .-_,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WATER WELL RECORD
10
- TO:
00 55
,-.. *.,.,,.".
Pscrtptloc iECTIQI
WELL LOG DEdCWPt ION! j i l t y eand and gravel . t.9. send ~ n d gravel
i 1
, ? u s 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L I N K S AutoFax
Date : August 19, 2002 TO : Golder Associates Ltd. Att'n: M s . Darlene Atkinson From: LINKS Automatic Fax Subject: Analytical results for Group# 30809091
( 0 9 : U O ) P g 1 of 1 6
Vancouver. BC V6J 1J8
Fax: 604 731 2386
Tel. 604 735 7276
1 800 665 8566
CanTesl Ltd.
Professional Anaivtical
A Member of the CANAM Group
Services
CANTEST Group# 30809091 Proj ect Name: Friesen Project Number: 022-4140 Submission Date: August 9 , 2002 Matrix : Water
This is a final report. A signed report and invoice will be sent by courier or mail.
Thank you for considering CANTEST for your analytical needs. Please feel free to contact a Technical Service Representative at (604) 734-7276 (1-800-665-8566) should you have any questions about the LINKS "AutoFax" or any other CANTEST services.
CANTEST & RESEARCH SERVICES GROUP Helping bring new Canadian products to market
NOTE: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it 1s addressed and contains information that is confidential. If the reader of this message is not the ktended recipient, or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, your are hereby notified that any disclosure or distribution of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communicofion In enor, piease notify us immediately by telephone and return the orlginal to us at the above address by mail without making a copy. Thank you.
AUG-19-2002 09:15 LINKS RutoFax 93% P.O1
gug 1 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L I N K S AutoFax
Q0
CLIENT SAMPLE Well Lot Well Lot I DENT IF1 CAT1 ON: #1 #2
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
t
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
DATE SAMPLED: Aug 9/02
CANTEST ID: 208090300
( 0 9 : O O ) P g 2 of 1 6
w
bjective
Aug 9/02
208090301
pH, Laboratory 7.84 7.87 True Color e 5 < 5 Turbidity 1.9 0.43 Total Dissolved Solids 322 31 6 Total Alkalinity CaC03 170 174 Bicarbonate Alkalinity HC03 208 21 3 Carbonate Alkalinity C03 < 0.5 < 0.5 Hydroxide Alkalinity OH e 0.5 < 0.5 Dissolved Chloride CI 6.3 5.2 Dissolved Sulphate SO4 76.5 76.5
RUG-19-2002 09115
6.5 - 8.5 pH units 15 cu 5 NTU 500 mg/L
mg/L mg/L mgiL mgiL
250 mg/L 500 mg/L
LINKS RutoFax
Total Metals Analysis Iron Fe 0.53 X Manganese Mn 0.003
93%
0.26 1 < 0.001
Page 3
P.02
Aug 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: LINKS AutoFax
crr
CLIENT SAMPLE Neil Lot Nell Lot IDENTlFl CATION: #1 #2
~~
DATE SAMPLED: Aug 9/02 Aug 9/02
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
208090300 CANTEST ID:
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
208090301
( 0 9 : 0 2 ) P q 3 of 16
U
Conductivity Hardness CaC03 Dissolved Fluoride F Nitrate and Nitrite N Dissolved Nitrate N Nitrite N Dissolved Sulphate SO4 Total Metals Analysis Calcium Ca Magnes ium Mg Potassium K Microbiological Analysis
Fecal Coliform Total Coliform (Confirmed)
501 213 0.09 0.93 0.82 0.93 0.82 10.0
76.5 76.5
64.2 16.9 2.73 2.91
< 0.002 < 0.002 1 .o
< 1 < 1 < 1 < 1
pS/crn = microsiemens per centimeter C01./100 mL = Colonies per 100 mL c = Less than detection limit
mg/L = milligrams per liter
RI IG-I 9-2L1W A 9 1 16 LINKS FlutoFax 93%
Page 4
P.03
Aug 19, 0 8 : 5 9 PST by: L I N K S AutoFax
'
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
CLIENT SAMPLE Well Lot Well Lot IDENTI Fl CATION: #I #2
SAMPLE PREPARATION:
DATE SAMPLED: Aug9/02 Aug9/02
CANTEST ID: 208090300 208090301
Calcium Ca 63.4 Iron Fe 0.24 Magnesium Mg 13.4 14.0 Manganese Mn 0.002 < 0.001 Pot as siu m K 2.67 2.88 Silicon Si02 17.0 18.3 0.05 Sodium Na 12.6 12.5 0.05
D I S SO LV E D D I S S 0 LVE D
LIMIT
( 0 9 : O l ) P g 4 of 1 6
VI
Page 5
RUG-19-2002 09:16 LINKS RutoFax 93% P.04
H u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: LINKS AutoFax
(cr
QC Type
pH Calibration Verification
D up1 i cate
Blank Conductivity Calibration Ve
Duplicate
Calibration Verification
Duplicate
Duplicate
D up1 i cate Duplicate Duplicate
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
QC Result
101.7 0.0 0.5
1 102.7 3.5 3.6
100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
(09:02) Pg 5 of 16
w
%Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D.
u S/c rn %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D.
Batch Quality Control for Conventional Parameters in Water
98 0 0
0 96 0 0
Parameter
Duplicate
Blank Alkalinity Calibration Ver. Duplicate Duplicate
Conductivity
8.1
2.8 94.0 0.2 0.6
rue Color
urbidify
Duplicate
Duplicate
Blank Dionex Certified Standard D up1 i cat e Duplicate Duplicate
otal Dissolved Solids
otal Alkalinity CaC03 r NC
NC
< 0.05 99.0 NC PASS PASS
Bicarbonate Alkalinity HC03
Carbonate Alkalinity C03
Hydroxide Alkalinity OH
Dissolved Fluoride F mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D. II
0 90 0 0 0
Blank Duplicate
D up1 icat e D up1 icat e
Units Lower Upper 1 /Limit /Limit
% Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.
NTU R.P.D.
R.P.D.
mg/L % Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D.
R.P.D. R.P.D.
R.P.D.
75 0 0 0
0 0
0
0 85 0 0
0 0
0
102 3 3
1
5 5
105 10 10 10
I104
0.1 15
18
4 115 9 9
9 9
9
I O ( 9 R.P.D.
0.05 110 10 10 10
(Continued on next page)
RUG-19-2002 09:17 LINKS RutoFax 93%
Page 6
P. 05
A u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L T N K S AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 2 ) Pg 6 o i 1 6
w U
R.P.D.
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
0 10
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.
mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.
mg/L %Recovery %Recovery R.P.D.
mg/L %Recovery R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D. R.P.D.
Batch Quality Control for Conventional Parameters in Water
0 90 0 0 0
0 90 0 0 0 0
0 86 93 0
0 90 0 0 0 0
'arameter
)issolved Fluoride F
)issolved Chloride
)issolved Nitrate
litrite
lissolved Sulphate
CI
N
N
SO4
QC Type
Duplicate
Blank Dionex Certified Standard Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate
Blank Dionex Certified Standard Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate
Blank Spike Calibration Verification Duplicate
Blank Dionex Certified Standard Duplicate Duplicate D up1 i cate Duplicate
QC Result
=ASS
c 0.2 104.6 1.1 1.6 6.5
< 0.05 98.3 0.0 2.2
UC 'ASS
< 0.002 99.0
UC
< 0.5 102.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
UC
98.0
0.2 110 12 12 12
0.05 110 10 10 10 10
0.002 112 107 12
1 110 10 10 10 10
uS/cm = microsiemens per centimeter CU = color units NTU = nephelometric turbidity units c = Less than detection limit R.P.D. = Relative Percent Difference
mg/L = milligrams per liter
PASS = Duplicate sample results were in the range of one to five times the detection limit. R.P.D. calculation is not applicable in this range. Acceptance criteria is a maximum difference between the duplicates equivalent to the value of the detection limit. NC = Not Calculated. Duplicate sample results were less than the detection limit. Relative Percent Difference calculatioi is not defined for analyte levels of less than detection limit.
RUG-19-2002 09:18
Page 7
D mC
Aug 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L T N K S AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 3 ) Pg 7 of 16
w U
Parameter Du licate Duplicate Spike ICPMS Spik ICPMS Spik z [R.F.D.) Limits (% Recovery, Limits 208090048 208090049 208090327
Magnesium Mg 0.4 20 Manganese Mn 110 69- 131 100 69 - 131
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
RUG-19-2002 09:18 97%
Page 8
P 07
A u q 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T b y : L T N K S AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 3 ) P q 8 of 1 6
W w
Parameter ICPMS Lab ICPMS Lab Total Blank Total Blank Fortified Fortified (mg/L) Limits Blank (% Blank Limits Recovery)
blanganese Mn 95 82 - 120 < 0.0002 0.001
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
potassium K
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
< 0.002 0.05
Batch Quality Control for Total Metals Analysis in Water (QC# 34796)
mg/L = milligrams p e r liter
Page 9
n nn
h u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 PST by: LTfiTKS AutoFax ( 0 9 : 0 4 ) Pg 9 of 1 6
w 'PI
Parameter
Aluminum AI Antimony Sb Arsenic As Barium Ba Beryllium Be Boron B Cadmium Cd Calcium Ca Chromium Cr Cobalt co Copper c u I tun Fe Lead Pb Lithium Li Magnesium Mg Manganese Mn Molybdenum Mo Nickel Ni Pot assiu rn K R u bidi urn Rb Selenium Se Silicon Si02 Silver
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
% Recovery Limits
92 87 - 131 93 86 - 110 96 88 - 108 96 88 - 114 100 91 - 127 100 87 - 129 97 87 - 111 96 91 - 121 92 86 - 124 90 88 - 118 93 90 - 112 88 85 - 182 93 88 - 114 103 85 - 115 100 91 - 121 102 88 - 130 89 85 - 105 95 86 - 112 96 84 - 118 90 50 - 200 105 95 - 115 99 87 - 115
72- 118
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
Instrument Quality Control for the HP 7500 ICPMS (QC# 86008)
nlr.,
Page 10
n on
Auq 19,. 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L T N K S AutoFax or)
Duplicate Units Result
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
Evaluation
( 0 9 : 0 4 ) Pg 10 of 1 6
W
Batch Quality Control for Microbiological Analysis in Water (QC# 34718)
Parameter
Fecal Coliform
QC Type
Duplicate Duplicate
Duplicate Duplicate Duplicate
Result
<1 <1
<1 <1 <1
Co1./100 mL = Colonies per 100 mL PASS = Duplicate analysis is within the 95% Confidence Limits. Duplicate analysis is evaluated using criteria included in British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual 1994 Edition, Section E, pages E l 1 to E12. (MPN method), or page E-56 (MF method).
Page 11
Q7.V P 1 m
A u y 1 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: LTNKS A u t o F a x U
Parameter QC Type QC Result
Total Coliform (Confirmed) Blank < 1
Fecal Coliform Blank < 1
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
( 0 9 : 0 4 ) P y 11 of 1 6
U
07.r
CoI./lOO mL
Page 12
n 1 1 1 1
A u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 P S T b y : L T W K S AutoFax W
QC Type No. Samples
Blank
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
lQC TY Pe
( 0 9 : 0 5 ) Pg 1 2 of 16
w
No. Samples
Batch Quality Control Frequency Summaty
Blank Duplicate
1 2
Turbidity Analysis (Batch# 34696)
QC Type
No. Samples
Blank
No. Samples
Blank Duplicate
1 4
QC Type No. Samples
(Continued on next page)
Page 13
P 1 3
A u y ? 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by: L - - ’ ” S AutoFax OJ
QC Type
Batch Size -
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
No. Samples
54
( 0 9 : 0 5 1 P g 1 3 of 16 ‘c9
QC Type
Batch Size
Batch Quality Control Frequency Summary
Coliform MF Method in Water (Batch# 34718)
Blank Duplicate
No. Samples
7
QCTYpe
Batch Size
Turbidity Analysis (Batch# 34696)
No. Samples
52
QCTYpe
Batch Size
Auto-Titrator Analysis (Batch# 34697)
No. Samples
39
II I NO. Samples L I
Batch Size 1 26
(Continued on next page)
.-._I.
Page 14
D 1 7
Lw's Aug 19, 08:59 P S T by:
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
Batch Quality Control Frequency Summary
Total Metals Preparation (Batch# 34796)
No. Samples I I
\Batch Size 1 54
Page 15
b-" A u y 1 9 , 0 8 : 5 9 P S T by:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID STATUS
Well Lot #1 Unacceptable
Analysis Report
REPORT ON: Analysis of Water Samples
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd. Suite 220 1755 Springfield Road Kelowna, B.C. V1Y 5v5
Att'n: Ms. Darlene Atkinson
CHAIN OF CUSTODY: PROJECT NAME: Friesen
731 87 SEBC
PROJECT NUMBER: 022-4140
( 0 9 : O L ) P g I S of 1 6
w CANTEST LTD.
Professional Analytical Services
4506 Canada Way Burnaby. B C. V5G 1 K5
FAX: 604 731 2386
TEL: 604 734 7276
1 800 665 8566
NUMBER OF SAMPLES: 2 REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
DATE SUBMITTED: August 9,2002 GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
SAMPLE TYPE: Water
NOTE: Test results contained in this repott refer only to the testing of samples submitted.
Aesthetic Objective Summary:
I / CLIENT SAMPLE ID I HEALTH I HARDNESS L I I I
ell Lot #1 I Acceptable I Hard
(Continued)
CANTEST LTD.
Tim Matsushita Coordinator, Water Laboratory
A Member ofthe w\wvI Group w w testing-labs.com
Page 1 of 15
n ~ r r
w ' A u g 19, 0 8 : 5 9 PST b y :
CLIENT SAMPLE ID HEALTH HARDNESS
pe l1 Lot #Z Acceptable Hard L
REPORTED TO: Golder Associates Ltd.
REPORT DATE: August 19,2002
GROUP NUMBER: 30809091
(09:Ov Py 16 of 16
pH, Laboratory - pH analysis was performed in the laboratory using a pH meter. It must be recognized that the B.C. Ministry of Environment and other regulatory agencies recommend that pH be analyzed immediately upon sample collection. In light of this, pH measurements should be performed in the field.
Conventional Parameters - analyses were performed using procedures based on those described in "British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual For the Analysis of Water, Wastewater, Sediment and Biological Materials" (1994 Edition), Province of British Columbia and "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" 20th Edition, (1998), published by the American Public Health Association.
Metals in Water - analysis was performed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP), Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy (ICP/MS) or Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry.
Microbiological Parameters - analyses were performed using procedures based on those described in "8. C. Environmental Laboratoty Manual For the Analysis of Water, Wastewater, Sediment and Biological Materials" (1994 Edition) and "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater", 20th Edition (1998). Analysis may be performed using either the MPN Method (reported as "Most Probable Number') or the Membrane Filtration (MF) Method (reported as "Colonies or CFU per unit volume"). Method selection is dependent upon factors including turbidity, microbial levels, etc.
TEST RESULTS;
(See following pages)
Page 2