Upload
harley-striplin
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Association for Compensatory Educators
of Texas (ACET) ConferenceMay 9, 2013
TEA Focus:State Compensatory
Education (SCE) Program
Welcome and
Panel Member Introductions
2
Julie Wayman
Director, Student Success UnitDivision of Federal and State
Education Policy Texas Education Agency
Telephone: (512) 936-6403 Fax: (512) 463- 4246
3
Vickie Ansley
Coordinator, Title I/SCE Region 16 Education Service
Center
Telephone: (806) 677-5134 Fax: (806) 677-5001
~ Amarillo
4
Anita Villarreal
State Coordinator for Title I, Part ADivision of Federal and State
Education Policy
Telephone: (512) 463-9402Fax: (512) 463-9560
Email: [email protected]@tea.state.tx.us
5
Session GoalsThis fast-paced panel discussion seeks to provide:
• A Focus on Coordinating Services Between Programs
• Overview of the State Compensatory Education Program
• Overview of the Title I, Part A Program
• Leverage Points for Coordination
• Supplement Not Supplant Considerations
• Other Key Considerations
• Coordination Scenarios and Table Discussion
• Needs Assessment- Focus Group and Input for TEA6
Session Is Not
• Comprehensive SCE Training • Comprehensive Title I, Part A
Training
Note: Several training sessions on these state and federal programs are available at ACET. You are encouraged to attend those sessions for training purposes. 7
Opportunities For Coordination
• Data Analysis• Needs Assessment• Campus Planning– Student and Campus Needs– Supplemental Services– Researched-Based and Evidence-Based
Strategies– Staffing
• Service Delivery• Documentation• Monitoring and Evaluation
8
State Compensatory Education (SCE) Program
Overview and Coordination Considerations
Vickie Ansley
9
Intent and Purpose of the SCE Program
Programs and/or services designed to supplement the regular education program for identified at-risk students• The goal for SCE is to reduce the disparity in
performance on (a) the state assessment and (b) rates of high school completion between students at-risk of dropping out of school and all other district students.
• Expenses must directly impact students and cannot be used for parental involvement activities.
10
Key Players in the State Compensatory Education Program
School DistrictsAdministratorsBusiness PersonnelProgram CoordinatorPEIMS ClerkCounselorsClassroom TeachersParents
Education Service Centers
SCE ConsultantsPEIMS Curriculum Specialists Counselors Contact
LegislatorsTexas Education Agency
11
Supplement, Not Supplant
• Any program activity, program personnel, or program materials required by federal law, state law, or State Board of Education rule may not be funded with SCE funds.
• SCE funds must be used to provide support programs and/or services that supplement the regular education program so that students at risk of dropping out of school can succeed in school.
12
Budgeting for State Comp Ed
Fund 199PIC 24 or PIC 30 (See next slide)• SCE funds are part of the local budget
that must be used for supplemental expenses to address the needs of identified at-risk students
• The Direct Cost requirement is now 52%
(19 TAC §105.11 )
13
Understanding Program Intent (PIC) Codes
• PIC 24 – Accelerated Instruction – SCE on non-T-I campus (only identified at-
risk served)– SCE on a T-I campus below 40% poverty
(only at-risk)– Title I, Part C Migrant Services
• PIC 26 – SCE: Non-Disciplinary Alt. Ed. (Basic)
• PIC 28 – SCE: Disciplinary Alt. Ed. (Basic)
• PIC 29 – SCE: Disciplinary Alt. Ed. (Supplemental)
• PIC 30 – Title I Schoolwide Activities– Title I (SW campus) – SCE on T-I SW campus 40% poverty or above
14
SC5000 Campus Selection
(This schedule is located in the Consolidated Application for Federal Funding)
15
SCE Scenario 1Learn A Lot ISD will open a new elementary school for the 13-14 school year, Texas Elementary School. The low income percentage of the campus is 45.34%.
1. What PIC code will be used for the Texas Elem. School SCE campus budget?
2. Which students can receive SCE services on the Texas Elem. School campus?
3. Do you need additional information to answer these questions? If so, what?
16
• PIC 32 – Pre-K Expenditures (currently)
• Beginning with 2013-2014 PEIMS budget financial data submission and the 2014-2015 PEIMS actual financial data submission–PIC 34 – Pre-K Expenditures specific
to State Compensatory Education
• For more information, see To the Administrator Addressed letter dated Monday, March 11, 2013 from TEA
Understanding Program Intent (PIC) Codes
17
SCE Scenario 2
Texas Elementary School will become a Title I SW campus in January of 2014 after completion of the required School Support Teams Schoolwide planning.
1. What PIC code will be used for the Texas Elem. School SCE campus budget beginning in January?
2. Which students can receive SCE services on the Texas Elem. School campus?
3. Do you need additional information to answer these questions? If so, what?
18
Requirements for C/DIPs• Comprehensive Needs Assessment -
conducted to identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing programs, practices, procedures, and activities; ensures the use of resources is carefully planned, supplemental and cost effective
NCLB Program Series: Improvement Plans19
NCLB Publications: Comprehensive Needs Assessment
20
NCLB Publications: Improvement Plans
SCE Planning Requirements: Linking SCE to Title I, Part A ~ Pages 12 & 13
21
Region 20 Publication Initiative
http://portal.esc20.net/portal/page/portal/NCLB/default.htm
22
Primary Source of Documentation for SCE Program
• The D/CIP is auditable documentation and is the primary record supporting expenditures attributed to SCE and Title I Programs.
• The D/CIP must be developed, evaluated and revised annually.
23
• SCE funds must be in a separate budget than Title I, Part A funds
• LEA maintains documentation that all funded programs and strategies are supported by scientifically-based research
• SW campus must be identified in the most current SAS (Schedule SC5000) of the Consolidated App. for Federal Funding at 40% low income or higher
• Flexibility – ONLY for T-I SW campuses at TRUE 40% economically disadvantaged
• Does not apply to: SW campuses using Feeder Pattern SW Previous Year Ed-Flex waiver A district or an ESC
SCE: Upgrading a Title I Schoolwide Program
24
The campus improvement plan can demonstrate how SCE dollars are being used to upgrade the T-I, Part A program by:
• Indicating the amount of SCE dollars used on the campus to upgrade the T-I, Part A SW educational program
• Indicating “effective” strategies being implemented to meet the needs of at-risk students
• Indicating how the SCE program is implemented to benefit all students in need
• Describing how other local, state and federal resources will be used in conjunction with Title I funds.
(A requirement for Schoolwide plans)
• SCE must still be evaluated for effectiveness for meeting the intent of the program
SCE: Upgrading a Title I Schoolwide Program
25
Module 9: SCE
Financial Accountability System Resource Guide (FASRG)
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=1222
26
Module 9 of the Financial Accountability System
Resource Guide (FASRG)
27
SCE Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=4082
28
Title I, Part A Overview and Coordination
Considerations
Anita Villarreal29
Title I, Part A
• Anita Villarreal ~ State Coordinator for Title I, Part A - Texas Education Agency
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=4261&menu_id=2147483742
30
Title I, Part AIntent and Purpose
To increase the achievement of all students, particularly those who are disadvantaged.
31
The federal supplement, not supplant provision is intended to ensure that services provided under Title I are in addition to, and not in place of, services that would otherwise be provided to participating students with state and local funds if Title I funds were not available.
Supplement not Supplant
32
Supplement not Supplant
Funds for this program must be used to supplement (increase the level of services) and not supplant (replace) funds from nonfederal sources.
33
Any program activity required by state law, State Board of Education (SBOE) rules, or local board policy may not be paid with these funds.
Supplement not Supplant
34
State or local funds may not be decreased or diverted for other uses merely because of the availability of these funds.
Supplement not Supplant
35
SCE NeedsAssessment
Focus Group
Julie Wayman36
1. What are 2-3 take-away ideas for SCE and Title 1, Part A coordination?
2. What are your remaining SCE and Title 1, Part A coordination questions?
3. What are some challenges with implementing the SCE Program?
4. What SCE question(s) do you have that are not answered in the existing TEA guidance documents?
5. In addition to the current SCE guidance documents, what additional technical assistance from TEA is needed regarding the SCE program?
SCE Needs Assessment Focus Group
37
Thank You!
Questions or Comments?
Please submit questions or comments to the
NCLB Mailbox: [email protected]
38