ASW Process for Standard 6 Virtual Meeting July 10, 2015

ASW Process for Standard 6

Virtual MeetingJuly 10, 2015

NCDPI ASW Team

AP/IBSneha Shah-Coltrane

CoordinatorJen DeNeal

ASW Questions

Please capture your questions by writing them down. As we progress through today’s meeting, listen carefully for the answer.

Periodically, we will ask you to enter any unanswered questions from the sections we’ve just covered in the Questions box to be answered.

Poll Questions

Who are you with ASW?• ASW Coordinator for my district or

charter school• ASW Lead for my school or

department• Teacher who uses ASW for

Standard 6• Curious Onlooker or Observer

Poll Questions

Where are you joining us from today?• Office/School• Home• On the Road• Vacation Location• That information cannot be

disclosed.

Poll Questions

Did your district/charter implement ASW during 2014 – 2015?• Yes, so I have some experience with ASW.• Yes, but ASW is new to me this year.• Not sure.• No, but some training was done on ASW.• No, I/we are all new to ASW.

Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.

Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students.

Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.

Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.

Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice.

Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.

NC Professional Teaching Standards

5 Rating Categories

1 65432Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

KnowContent

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute

to Academic

Success

3 Rating Categories

Not Demonstrated

Developing

Proficient

Accomplished

Distinguished

Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System

Overview of Standard 6

Contribute to

Academic Success

End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests

6 NC Final Exams

6 Career Technical Education Assessment

6 Analysis of Student Work

K-3 Checkpoints6

6

Analysis of Student Work

6 Analysis of Student Work

Contribute

to Academic

Success

ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in:• Advanced Placement, • Arts Education, • Healthful Living, • International Baccalaureate, and • World Languages.

Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

Principal’s Input

Confirm Teacher Participation

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

2015 – 2016 ASW Process Timelinehttp://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/15-16Implementation

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/15-16Implementation

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/15-16Implementation

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

ASW Process: A Quick Guide

Teaching Context

• Screen shot

Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s schedule has been validated. The principal will then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the schedule is correct.

Principal’s Input


Class Selection

The online platform will select the classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts.

ASW Questions

Now is the time to enter any unanswered questions from the sections we’ve just covered in the Questions box to be answered by the ASW Team and shared with all.


Objectives:Using the Strands and Standards Guidance Charts, the teacher will choose 5 objectives.

Objective Selection

Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart

Some examples of meetings:• PDPs• teacher meetings

Principal’s Input


Teacher decisions needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA):a) A specific objective

b) Sample type• Individual Student

or

• Whole Class

c) Collection Method

d) Student work samples from Point 1 and Point 2

e) Context

5 Timelapse Artifacts

A.S.W.

A.S.W.

A.S.W.

A.S.W.

The Clarifying Objective or CO that is chosen must match the teacher’s instruction and artifacts. A.S.W.

A.S.W. A.S.W.

A.S.W.

A.S.W.Analysis ofStudentWork

Specific Objective

The Teacher may choose:Option 1 – Individual Student Work SamplesCollect and keep 2 work samples:• for each class member• for a specific objective • at 2 separate points in time

OR

Sample Type

The Teacher may choose:Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples2 work samples that represent the entire class• for a specific objective • at 2 separate points in time

Sample Type

Pre TestSljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf

sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf

sdf

Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf

sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0

lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljkLjdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;lj

kw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf

Sljd

Collection Method → File Size

Up to 20 MB per file!

Time passes

Teachers Collect Work Samples for Timelapse Artifacts

. . . weeks. . . months . . .


TA 1

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples

Online platform will select3 students

The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students.

Student Selection

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples

If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled and another student will be selected.

Student Selection

TA 1

TA 1

Principal’s Input

The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher.

ASW Virtual Meeting Activity

Go to the Teacher Resources page on the ASW wiki at http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ and download the

ASW Quick Guide, plus . . .

1 or more resources that will be helpful to you and/or your team as you implement the ASW Process in 2015 – 2016

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/


ASW Questions


Poll Questions

What did you download from the Teacher Resources page after the ASW Quick Guide?• ASW Course Codes• Planning Worksheet(s)• Strands & Standards Chart(s)• Other . . . • I got distracted but I’ll do it later.


Frequency and Duration: • How often and for how long do you see your

students? Examples: 45 minutes once per week for an entire year, 30 minutes twice per week for a semester.

• Include information about missed classes or special scheduling information that might be helpful to the reviewer.

Context

What is the purpose of the Narrative Context?

• To communicate to the reviewer where the students’ skill or knowledge is in relation to the selected objective at two points in time during instruction,

How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?

Context

How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?

This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways.1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest.3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow.4. The elbows are bending during the compression.

• To describe the amount of growth that occurred in relation to the selected objective between the two points in time.

Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2, including how much time passed between the two points in time.

Context

Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.

CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival

Timelapse Artifact – Individual Student Work Samples

1

2

1

2

1

2

1 Timelapse

Artifact

Upload Evidence

Timelapse Artifact – Whole Class Work Samples 2

1

1 Timelapse Artifact

Upload Evidence

All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platformas the teacher’sEvidence Collectionfor the school year.

TA 3Individual Students

TA 4Individual Students

TA 5Whole Class

TA 1 Individual Students

TA 2 Whole Class

Upload Evidence


The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Blind Review

ED M


The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise.

Blind Review

Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth


If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year.

M

Blind Review

M


If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.

M

Reviewer #3

Blind Review

E

2-Step ASW Process ReviewThese will be explained in detail in later modules.

#1Evidence Collection Checklist

#2

ASW Quality Rubric

Blind Review

ASW Questions



• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth

• M = Meets Expected Growth

• E = Exceeds Expected Growth

Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:

Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection

Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection

Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Evidence Collection Rating Form:

TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5

Receive Rating

• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth

Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:

Evidence Collection Rating Form:

TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5

Receive Rating

D M M M E

Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating

a

Receive Rating

aDoes Not Meet Meets ExceedsD D D D D M M M M M E E E E ED D D D E M M M M E M E E E ED D D D M D M M M M M M E E ED D D E E M M M E E D E E E ED D D M E D D M M M D M E E ED D D M M D M M M E D D M M E

D D M E E

D M M E E

D D E E E

An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own data for Standard 6

Effectiveness Status

3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6

6 6 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Standard Standard Standard

6 6

Contribute to Academic

Success

6Year 1

2014-2015Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Year 22015-2016

Meets Expected Growth

Year 32016-2017



Ms. NC’s 3 years of growth data:

2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1)

2015-16 Meets (Year 2)+ 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)

Ms. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth

Effectiveness Status LEAs/Charter Schools who took part in ASW in 2014 Best 2 out of 3 years of data

6 6


Success

6Year 1

2014-2015Meets

Expected Growth

Year 22015-2016

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Year 32016-2017



Mrs. NC’s 3 years of growth data:

2014-15 Meets (Year 1) School Wide Data 2015-16 Does Not Meet

(Year 2)+ 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)

Mrs. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth

Effectiveness Status LEAs/Charter Schools who waived out of ASW in 2014 Best 2 out of 3 years of data

School Wide Data

6 6


Success

6Year 1

2015-2016Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Year 22016-2017


Year 32017-2018



Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data:

2015-16 Does Not Meet (Year 1)

2016-17 Meets (Year 2)+ 2017-18 Meets (Year 3)

Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2015-2018 Meets Expected Growth

Effectiveness StatusCharter Schools that are part of ASW for the first time in 2015

Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017

2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership

Standard 2 Establish Environment

Standard 3Know Content

Standard 4Facilitate Learning

Standard 5 Reflect on Practice

Standard 6Three year growth

data

X

X

XX

X3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017


Principal Role

In Need of Improvement

Effective Highly Effective

Any rating lower than proficient

Proficient or Higher

on Standards1-5

Accomplishedor Higher

on Standards1-5

1Demonstrate Leadership

2Establish Environment

345

Know Content

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Standards

Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth


6Contribute to Academic Success (3 yrs. of data)


2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership

Standard 2 Establish Environment

Standard 3Know Content

Standard 4Facilitate Learning

Standard 5 Reflect on Practice

Standard 6Three year growth

data

X

X

XX

XBest 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017


Effective

Principal Role

ASW Questions


Questions about Educator Effectiveness, NCEES or ASWVisitwww.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model

or http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki

or

ASW Wiki at http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/

You can also email questions to

[email protected]

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model

http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NCEES+Wiki





mailto:[email protected]

Thank you for joining us today!

This broadcast will be archived on the ASW Wiki under Virtual Meetings on the Professional Development tab http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/VirtualMeetings

approximately 1 week from today

Don’t forget . . .

The next virtual meeting is about ASW Professional Development and will be on Tuesday, July 28.

Register using the link on the Virtual Meetings wikipage.

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/VirtualMeetings

http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/VirtualMeetings

Documents

ASW Process for Standard 6 Virtual Meeting July 10, 2015