View
223
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Asymptotic Methods: Introduction to Boundary Function Method (Lectures 7 - 9)
Leonid V. KalachevDepartment of Mathematical Sciences
University of Montana
Based of the book The Boundary Function Method for Singular Perturbation Problems by A.B. Vasil’eva, V.F. Butuzov and L.V. Kalachev, SIAM, 1995
(with additional material included)
Lectures 7 - 9: Simple BoundaryValue Problems, Method of Vishik and
Lyusternik for Partial Differential Equations. Applied Chemical
Engineering Example.
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Simple Boundary Value Problems
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
!!!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
----------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
============================
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
IMPORTANT !L
eonid V. K
alachev 2003 U
M
!!!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
!!!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Illustration of Condition 3΄: one point of intersectionL
eonid V. K
alachev 2003 U
M
Illustration of Condition 3΄: two points of intersectionL
eonid V. K
alachev 2003 U
M
No points of intersection: Condition 3΄ is not satisfied L
eonid V. K
alachev 2003 U
M
!!!
This concludes the construction of the leading order approximation!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
All the terms of theleading order approximation havenow been determined:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Generalizations:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Singularly Perturbed Partial Differential Equations
The Method of Vishik-Lyusternik
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
IMPORTANT !
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Generalization:
Corner layer boundary functions. Natural applicationsinclude singularly perturbed parabolic equations and, e.g, singularly perturbed elliptic equations in rectangular domains.
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Chemical EngineeringExample:
Model reductions for multiphase phenomena(study of a catalyticreaction in a three phase continuously stirred tank reactor[CSTR])
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Series process consisting of the following stages:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Reaction scheme:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Some notation (for a detailed notation listSee Haario and Kalachev [2]):
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Initial and boundary conditions:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Micro-model
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
The Limiting Cases
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Uniform asymptotic approximation in the form:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
!!!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
!!!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Similar for higher order terms!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
We look for asymptotic expansion in the same form!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
!!!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Higher order terms can be constructed in a similar way!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Asymptotic approximation in the same form!
This case is a combination of Cases 1 and 2. Omitting thedetails, let us write down the formulae for the leading orderapproximation.
Corresponding initial condition:
And
Similar analysis for higher order terms!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
We apply the same asymptotic procedure!
Corresponding initial condition:
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Comparison of the solutions for a fullmodel (with ‘typical’ numerical values of parameters) and the limiting cases:
Cases 2 and 4 both approximate the full model considerably well!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
The task then is to design anexperimental setup that allows one to
discriminate between Case 2 and Case 4:
Changing input gas concentration!
With typical experimental noise in thedata, the discrepancy between Cases 2 and 4
might not exceed the error level!
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
REFERENCES:
1. A.B.Vasil’eva, V.F.Butuzov, and L.V.Kalachev, TheBoundary Function Method for Singular PerturbationProblems, Philadelphia: SIAM, 1995.
2. H.Haario and L.Kalachev, Model reductions for multi-phase phenomena, Intl. J.of Math. Engineeringwith Industrial Applications (1999), V.7, No.4,pp. 457 – 478.
3. L.V.Kalachev, Asymptotic methods: application to reduction of models, Natural Resource Modeling (2000),V.13, No. 3, pp. 305 – 338.
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM
Leonid V
. Kalachev 2003
UM