31
AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances of the other magnets vs. ones expected from the design? 2.) Any impact on the expected safe machine collision energy for commissioning? 3.) What is the repair/replacement strategy in case of a damage to a magnet? What are the delays? 4.) How many spares are foreseen? 5.) What can be expected from central workshop in case of problems? How long will it take?

AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

1

What are today's issues for all other magnets?

Questions

1.) What are the as build performances of the other magnets vs. ones expected from the design?

2.) Any impact on the expected safe machine collision energy for commissioning?

3.) What is the repair/replacement strategy in case of a damage to a magnet? What are the delays?

4.) How many spares are foreseen?

5.) What can be expected from central workshop in case of problems? How long will it take?

Page 2: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

2

What are “all other magnets” ?

Warm magnets

– 19 types, 845 items installed

Cold Dispersion Suppressor Magnets

– 5 types, made by combining 7 different types of magnets, 64 sets installed

Cold Matching Section

– 9 types, made by combining 7 different types of magnets, 50 sets installed

Cold Separation Dipoles

– 4 types, 20 installed (4 spares)

Inner Triplet Magnets

– 3 types, made using 12 different magnets, 8*3 sets installed (1 spare each)

Cold Correctors

– 26 types*), 4662 sets installed

In total 5669 magnets coming in 66 types (11h talk?)

– *) depends on the way of counting

Page 3: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

3

Warm Magnets in the LHC and the transfer lines

Separation dipole /

3.4m

Separation dipole /

1.5m

Separation dipole / 0.75m

Separation dipole /

3.4m

Corrector / 1.7m

Corrector / 1.7m

Quadrupole / 3.1m

type MBXW MBXWT MBXWS MBW MCBWH MCBWV MQW

location IR1,5,8 IR2 IR8 IR3,7 IR3,7 IR3,7 IR3,7

total 29 3 3 24 10 10 52

for installation

25 2 2 20 8 8 48

spares 4 1 1 4 2 2 4

sets of spare coils

1 1 1 1 1.51

Dipole / 5.3m

Dipole / 6.7m

Dipole/ 3.4m

Dipole/ 2.8m

Quadrupole/ 2.99m

Quadrupole / 1.6m

Corrector / 0.45m

type MBHC MBI MBIA MBIB QTL MQI MCIAlocation TT40 TI2+8 TI2&8 TI2&8 TI2+8 TI2+8

total 4 360 59 11 1 185 105for

installation3 348 56 11 1 178 95

spares 1 12 3 0 depends 7 10sets of

spare coils0 2 4

Page 4: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

4

Septa and Total Sum of Warm Magnets

Injection Septum

magnets / 3.65m-4m

Injection Septum

magnets / 3.65m-4m

Beam Dumping Septum

magnets / 4m-4,46m

Beam Dumping Septum

magnets / 4m-4,46m

Beam Dumping Septum

magnets / 4m-4,46m

in total

type MSIA MSIB MSDA MSDB MSDC

location TI2+8 TI2+8 IR6 IR6 IR6

total 5 7 11 11 11 901for

installation4 6 10 10 10 845

spares 1 1 1 1 1 56sets of spare

coils1 1 1 1 2

Page 5: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

5

Performance and Fault Scenarios

1) 'As built' performance of all magnets is higher or equal to the one expected from the design. MBXWT will require a higher water flow-rate (6l/min instead of 4l/min) to reach the requested ultimate performance.

2) No impact on energy during commissioning.

3) Repair in situ for small damages / faults in short interventions. Replacement of magnet in all other cases.

4) Number of spares barely sufficient.

5) Magnet workshop exists, Main workshop delivers bits and pieces.

Anticipated Faults:

– Leakage due to Corrosion, Erosion, Mechanical forces on connectors

– Blocking of cooling circuit - Thermo-switch fault

– Insulation damage due to radiation, heat, forces

– Beam damage - Transport accident

Page 6: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

6

Caveat (1)

Delays for exchange and repair will probably depend rather on radiation cool-down times. Cool-down times depend on the length of intervention. For a MQW exchange >1week

The minimum replacement time depends on the time needed to bring the transport vehicles in the right places and to prepare them for the specific magnet type. At least one day, better two should be foreseen for this operation.

Magnet transport will be hindered by shielding blocks that will have to be removed. In particular in IR7, it is unclear to me, how and how far they are to be transported, what the impact of this operation is and at what moment of cool-down it can take place.

Repairs of the magnet connections can be executed after cool-down of the magnet. Exchange of coils requires opening of the magnet with particular tools. We have so far recuperated tools from the manufacturers or requested to keep them in a good shape for us and we will do so in future.

Page 7: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

7

Caveat (2)

Handling equipment for Russian magnets is not CE certified and will therefore not be readily accepted by SC. Currently no workunits for the repair, adaptation or replacement-acquisition of such equipment is forseen. It will require considerable time and effort to do such repairs. However, the time needed should be guaranteed by a sufficient number of spares.

MQW in particular is a structurally sensitive magnet that requires a particular procedure with sufficient space and time. As far as possible, the detailed production procedures were collected and filed. However like in football, it needs time to replace a trained team that achieved the tasks on a series of 52 magnets. (E.g. we know that the multipole parameters over the series follows a clear trend.)

Page 8: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

8

Optimistic Magnet Exchange Schedule

Magnet Exchange

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Ventil

atio

n inte

rven

tion

Acces

s with

Bugg

y Tr

ain

Acces

s with

Hyd

raulic

Aggre

gate

Apply

elec

trica

l sec

urity

mea

sure

s

Disco

nnect C

urre

nt

Mount

pro

tect

ion c

over

s

Lift M

agnet

Loadin

g

Transv

ersa

l Move

men

t

Transp

ort t

o Acc

ess

Point

Unload

ing

of dam

aged

mag

net

Closi

ng o

f shie

ldin

g in IP

6

Transp

ort f

rom

Acc

ess

Point

Unsecu

ring

Exit b

uggie

s

Exit w

ith B

uggy

Tra

in

Remove

Aux

iliar

y Jac

ks

Connec

t Wat

er

Connec

t Inte

rlock

s

Mount

pro

tect

ion c

over

Pre-A

lignm

ent

Ventil

atio

n inte

rven

tion

Work

Ma

n H

ou

rsIn total 22 man hours, in about 7hours.

Preparation, Vacuum and Alignment not counted

Page 9: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

9

Optimistic Magnet Exchange Schedule

Magnet Exchange

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Ventil

atio

n inte

rven

tion

Acces

s with

Bugg

y Tr

ain

Acces

s with

Hyd

raulic

Aggre

gate

Apply

elec

trica

l sec

urity

mea

sure

s

Disco

nnect C

urre

nt

Mount

pro

tect

ion c

over

s

Lift M

agnet

Loadin

g

Transv

ersa

l Move

men

t

Transp

ort t

o Acc

ess

Point

Unload

ing

of dam

aged

mag

net

Closi

ng o

f shie

ldin

g in IP

6

Transp

ort f

rom

Acc

ess

Point

Unsecu

ring

Exit b

uggie

s

Exit w

ith B

uggy

Tra

in

Remove

Aux

iliar

y Jac

ks

Connec

t Wat

er

Connec

t Inte

rlock

s

Mount

pro

tect

ion c

over

Pre-A

lignm

ent

Ventil

atio

n inte

rven

tion

Work

Ma

n H

ou

rsIn total 22 man hours, in about 7hours.

Preparation, Vacuum and Alignment not counted

17 man hours work for MEL

The section has only 12+1 staff and 10 industrial support for all accelerators

The LHC subsection (knowledge of the MQW) has 3 staff +1 industrial support

The radiation dose/magnet exchange is estimated to ~19 mSv, thereof ~12 mSv for MEL.

To stay below 2mSv/man/intervention => 6 people needed to exchange 1 magnet/month and 5/year.

Page 10: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

10

Optimistic Magnet Exchange Schedule

Magnet Exchange

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Ventil

atio

n inte

rven

tion

Acces

s with

Bugg

y Tr

ain

Acces

s with

Hyd

raulic

Aggre

gate

Apply

elec

trica

l sec

urity

mea

sure

s

Disco

nnect C

urre

nt

Mount

pro

tect

ion c

over

s

Lift M

agnet

Loadin

g

Transv

ersa

l Move

men

t

Transp

ort t

o Acc

ess

Point

Unload

ing

of dam

aged

mag

net

Closi

ng o

f shie

ldin

g in IP

6

Transp

ort f

rom

Acc

ess

Point

Unsecu

ring

Exit b

uggie

s

Exit w

ith B

uggy

Tra

in

Remove

Aux

iliar

y Jac

ks

Connec

t Wat

er

Connec

t Inte

rlock

s

Mount

pro

tect

ion c

over

Pre-A

lignm

ent

Ventil

atio

n inte

rven

tion

Work

Ma

n H

ou

rsIn total 22 man hours, in about 7hours.

Preparation, Vacuum and Alignment not counted

17 man hours work for MEL

The section has only 12+1 staff and 10 industrial support for all accelerators

The LHC subsection (knowledge of the MWQ) has 3 staff +1 industrial support

The radiation dose/magnet exchange is estimated to ~19 mSv, thereof ~12 mSv for MEL.

To stay below 2mSv/man/intervention => 6 people needed to exchange 1 magnet/month and 5/year.

MEL would be unable to exchange a MQW under the present conditions

Page 11: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

11

Quench Behaviour of MQM and MQY Magnetsin the Matching Section and Dispersion Supressor

MQ

MC

01

MQ

M_0

2

MQ

M_0

7

MQ

MC

08

MQ

MC

09

MQ

M_1

5 S1

S4

S7

01000200030004000500060007000

Current

Magnet

Quench

AP

1M

QY

_0

1

AP

2

AP

1M

QY

_0

7

AP

2

S1

S3

S5

S7

S9

S110500

100015002000250030003500

4000

MQM

MQY

Extraordinary good quench behavior

Quench margin 1mJ/cm^3 in DS and 5mJ/cm^3 in MS

(short disturbance)

Page 12: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

12

Summary of MQXA Quench Training,Inner Triplet

5000

6000

7000

8000

QuenchNo Quench

Que

nch

Cur

rent

(A

)

MQXA-1 2 3 5 4

215 T/m

230 T/m

Quench Sequence

2b

Thermal cycle

Thermal cycle

7 106 9 8 111st T.C.

1912 13

Thermal cycle

14 15112nd

T.C.

16

Bore modification

17 18

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10

12

14

#1 #2 #3 #5 #4 #2b

#7 #6 #9 #8 #10

#11(

1st)

#12

#13

#14

#11

#15

#16

#17

#18

#19

Straight-SectionLead-EndReturn-End

Num

ber

of Q

uenc

h T

rain

ing

Magnet Number Number of quench reduced

Number of quenches high due to fault in the bore.

Page 13: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

13

Summary of MQXA Quench Training,Inner Triplet

5000

6000

7000

8000

QuenchNo Quench

Que

nch

Cur

rent

(A

)

MQXA-1 2 3 5 4

215 T/m

230 T/m

Quench Sequence

2b

Thermal cycle

Thermal cycle

7 106 9 8 111st T.C.

1912 13

Thermal cycle

14 15112nd

T.C.

16

Bore modification

17 18

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10

12

14

#1 #2 #3 #5 #4 #2b

#7 #6 #9 #8 #10

#11(

1st)

#12

#13

#14

#11

#15

#16

#17

#18

#19

Straight-SectionLead-EndReturn-End

Num

ber

of Q

uenc

h T

rain

ing

Magnet Number Number of quench reduced

Number of quenches high due to fault in the bore.

225 T/m

Page 14: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

14

Summary of MQXB Quench Training, Inner Triplet

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

Qu

ench

Cu

rren

t, A

4.5K

no quench

205T/m Operating Gradient

230T/m Test Goal

Superfluid

Prototype - Q2P1

01 02 03 04 06 05 1210

LQXB01 LQXB04LQXB03LQXB02

0811

LQXB05 LQXB06 LQXB07

07 09

14

15

Short sample current

Page 15: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

15

Summary of MQXB Quench Training, Inner Triplet

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

Qu

ench

Cu

rren

t, A

4.5K

no quench

205T/m Operating Gradient

230T/m Test Goal

Superfluid

Prototype - Q2P1

01 02 03 04 06 05 1210

LQXB01 LQXB04LQXB03LQXB02

0811

LQXB05 LQXB06 LQXB07

07 09

14

15

225 T/m

Page 16: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

16

Realistic Margin for the Inner Triplet

Using Lucas parameterization and ignoring the cooling (i.e. short times)

Energy Density to reach Tcs in J/m^3 in the MPZ

100 125 150 175 200 2250

2000

4000

6000

8000

1 104

1.2 104

1.4 104

1.6 104

1.8 104

2 104

20000

0

EnergyA Ba g( )( )

EnergyB Bb g( )( )

225100g

T

m

MQXA

MQXB

2 mJ/cm^3, 0.4 mW/cm^3

Page 17: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

17

Summary of D2-D4 Quench Training

Page 18: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

18

MQM, MQY, MQXA, MQXB, MBX, MBRB, MBRS

2) No impact on safe energy during commissioning

3a) MQXA, MQXB, MBX, MBRB, MBRS: Replace with the one spare (warm-up, exchange, cooldown ~6 weeks) , repair magnet (6 months or more)

3b) MQM, MQY, MQTL: No complete spares available due to the big number of different combinations. At least two month for building a new assembly, followed by test, installation, ELQA, cool down, ELQA ~1 month

Magnet building workshop needed in 181, Main workshop has to provide welders.

Cryostating must also be available.

Page 19: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

19

Corrector Types

Main dipoles

– 2464 Sextupole Spool Correctors MCS (100)

– 1232 Decapole-Octupole Spool Correctors MCDO (100) Main quadrupoles (Short Straight Sections)

– 360 Sextupole-Dipole Correctors MSCB (20)

– 192 Tuning and Skew Quadrupoles MQT/S (20)

– 168 Octupole Lattice Correctors MO (20) Insertion quadrupoles

– 16 Sextupole-Dipole Correctors MSCB (see above)

– 122 Dipole Correctors MCBC/Y (14)

– 60 Long Trim Quadrupoles MQTL (4) Inner Triplets

– 27 Inner Triplet Dipole Correctors MCBX (3)

– 9 Sextupole-Dodecapole Inserts MCSTX (1)

– 9 Inner Triplet Corrector Packages MQSXA => MQSX/MCSOX (1)

4659 Corrector Magnets

13 Main types 10 Contracts

Total value of the spare correctors > 2.6 MCHF

Page 20: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

20

MCD

Histogram for MCDs - Tesla

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 More

Number of quenches to reach 550A

Nu

mb

er o

f m

agn

ets

AT-MEL-MC Histogram for MCDs - Tesla

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Number of quenches to reach 800 A

Nu

mb

er o

f m

ag

ne

ts

AT-MEL-MC

All Indian magnets reached design with the first quench.

Also the number of quenches to reach maximum +2 is considerably lower!

Histogram for MCDs - India

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9M

ore

Number of quenches to reach 800 A

Nu

mb

er

of

ma

gn

ets

AT-MEL-MC

Page 21: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

21

MCO

Histogram for MCOs - Tesla

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1 2 3 4 5 More

Number of quenches to reach 100 A

Nu

mb

er o

f m

agn

ets

AT-MEL-MC Histogram for MCOs - Tesla

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Number of quenches to reach 150 A

Nu

mb

er o

f m

ag

ne

ts

AT-MEL-MC

All Indian MCO reach 100 A with one quench. In most cases one quench is sufficient to reach 160A

Histogram for MCOs - India

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MoreNumber of quenches to reach 150 A

Nu

mb

er

of

ma

gn

ets

AT-MEL-MC

Page 22: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

22

MCS Antec and CAT

Histogram for MCS - Antec

1

10

100

1000

10000

1 2 3 4 5 Other

Number of quenches to reach 550 A

Nu

mb

er

of

ma

gn

ets

AT-MEL-MCHistogram for MCS - Antec

1

10

100

1000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15

Number of quenches to reach 850 A

Nu

mb

er

of

mag

ne

ts

AT-MEL-MC

Histogram for MCS - CAT

1

10

100

1000

1 2 Other

Number of quenches to reach 550 A

Num

ber o

f mag

nets

AT-MEL-MCHistogram for MCS - CAT

1

10

100

1000

1 2 3 4 5 6 More

Number of quenches to reach 850 A

Num

ber o

f mag

nets

AT-MEL-MC

550 A 850 A

Including one extra quench

Page 23: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

23

MOs

Histogram for M0 - Antec

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Mor

e

Number of quenches to reach 700 AN

umbe

r of

mag

nets

AT-MEL-MC

255 MOs reach the nominal current (550 A) at the first quench, 5 MOs at the second quench

700 A

Page 24: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

24

MQTs

Histogram for MQT - Ansaldo

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Number of quenches to reach 550A

Nu

mb

er o

f m

agn

ets

AT-MEL-MCHistogram for MQT - Ansaldo

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Number of quenches to reach 600 AN

um

ber

of

mag

net

s

AT-MEL-MC

The MQT family has a comparatively high field and gradient,

I don’t expect much better behavior at 1.9 K

550 A 600 A

Page 25: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

25

Margin of the Q6 in IR3 (6 MQTLs)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

5000

1 104

1.5 104

2 104

2.5 104

3 104

3.5 104

Energy BB( )

BeamEnergy BB( )

Energy [J/m^3] needed to raise the temperature from 4.3 K to Tcs, cooling ignored

~in Gray if divided by 10^4

10 mJ/cm^3

Looks better than I expected

1 mW/cm^3

Page 26: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

26

Inner Triplet Correctors

KEK supplied

CERN supplied

MQXB MQXBMQXA

MCBX

MCBX

BPM

BPM

LMQXC LMQXA

To IP

Q2 Q1

FNAL supplied

A1 / B1 A1 / B1

MQXA

MCBXA

MQSX

LMQXB

MCSOX

Q3

A1 / B1B6 / B3

B4A4A3

A2

MCBX

Page 27: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

27

Quench performance:MCBX #4 Individual powering

Quenches at 4.4 K

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Quench number

Que

nch

Cur

rent

[A]

Inner Dipole

Inner Dipole 2nd Run

Outer Dipole

Outer Dipole 2nd Run

The

rmal

Cyc

leCourtesy of AT-MTM

Page 28: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

28

Superconducting motor

MCBX: Combined powering

Page 29: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

29

MSCB: Quench Performance

Training and Retraining of first 33 MCBM Dipole modules at 4.3 K

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Q1

Q3

Q5

Q7

Q9

Q11

Q13

Q15

Q17

R1

Q1

R1

Q3

R1

Q5

R1

Q7

R1

Q9

R1

Q11

R1

Q13

R1

Q15

R2

Q1

R2

Q3

R2

Q5

R2

Q7

R2

Q9

R2

Q11

R2

Q13

R2

Q15

R3

Q2

R3

Q4

R3

Q6

R3

Q8

R3

Q10

R3

Q12

R3

Q14

R4

Q1

R4

Q3

Quench

Qu

ench

Cu

rren

t [A

]

The

rmal

cyc

le

The

rmal

cyc

le

The

rmal

cyc

le

The

rmal

cyc

le

Production “fault” was intercepted, newer magnets are much better

Sextupoles are quenching much better as well.

Page 30: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

30

MSCB: Quench Performance

Training and retraining of first 28 MSM Sextupole modules at 4.3 K

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800Q

1

Q3

Q5

Q7

Q9

Q11

Q13

Q15

R1

Q2

R1

Q4

R1

Q6

R1

Q8

R1

Q10

R1

Q12

R1

Q14

R1

Q16

R1

Q18

R1

Q20

R1

Q22

R1

Q24

R1

Q26

R2

Q1

R2

Q3

R2

Q5

R2

Q7

R2

Q9

R2

Q11

R3

Q2

R3

Q4

Quench

Qu

ench

Cu

rren

t [A

]

The

rmal

cyc

le

The

rmal

cyc

le

The

rmal

cyc

le

Page 31: AT-MEL AT-MEL, K. H. Mess, “Chamonix” 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 What are today's issues for all other magnets? Questions 1.) What are the as build performances

AT-MELA

T-M

EL,

K.

H.

Mes

s, “

Cha

mon

ix”

2005

, C

ER

N,

1211

Gen

eva

23

31

Summary

Warm magnets

– Spares available, Manpower not available

– Workshop as for all other warm magnets

DS & MS

– Modules as spares, must be configured to cold masses and cryostated. Workshop in 181 (press) necessary including manpower!

Inner Triplett and Separation Dipoles

– ½ insertion as spare.

– Repair situation unclear to me (Japan/Toshiba- US/BNL/FNAL)

– Expected to fail within 7 years, we must start a replacement design now!

Correctors

– Included in the other magnets

– Spares available, manpower barely sufficient in the long run!

– Repair in house (> ½ year or longer if wire has to be procured)