ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG) 1 © Prof. K. ZografosLISBON MEETING 29/04/04 Transportation

ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG)

1© Prof. K. Zografos LISBON MEETING 29/04/04

Transportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory

Athens University of Economics and Business

Prof. Konstantinos G. Zografos

Evelpidon 47A and Lefkados 33116 32 Athens Greece

Tel.: +30-210-8203673-74-75Fax.: +30-210-8203684

e-mail: [email protected]

WP2: “OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT TRENDS AND TRANSLATION INTO PARAMETERS”

STEPS - LISBON MEETING

WP2: “METHODOLOGICAL AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT ISSUES”

29/04/04



WP2 OBJECTIVES (1)

IDENTIFY THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND ENERGY USE THROUGH THEIR INTERACTION WITH THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT.



WP OBJECTIVES (2)

IDENTIFY

•THE FACTORS AFFECTING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN:

•TRANSPORT

•LAND-USE

•ENERGY

•TAKE INTO ACCOUNT CHARACTERISTICS OF:

•VARIOUS TRANSPORT MODES

•FREIGHT PASSENGER TRANSPORT SYSTEM



Energy Supply

THE PROPOSED APPROACH

Socio-Economic Drivers

Political Drivers

Technological Drivers

Logistics / SCM Trends

Land Use

Mobility trends

Freight transport

Passenger transport

Energy Use / Management

Energy Supply

Energy Demand

Direct ImpactFeedback Impact



WP2: METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND SCOPE OF WORK (1)

TYPE OF MOVEMENT / GEOGRAPHICAL SCALE

TRANSPORT MODE

TYPE OF SYSTEM

•FREIGHT

•PASSENGER




TRANSPORT MODES TO BE ANALYZED

TYPES OF MOVEMENT – GEOGRAPHICAL SCALE

TYPES OF SYSTEMS

ROAD RAIL AIR WATER INTERMODAL

• PASSENGER

• FREIGHT

PASSENGER FREIGHT

• URBAN

• INTER - URBAN

• INTERNATIONAL

PASSENGER FREIGHT

• PRIVATE

• COLLECTIVE




“FORECASTING” HORIZON

SHORT

MEDIUM

LONG

RESEARCH METHODS

LITERATURE REVIEW

EXISTING STUDIES

SECONDARY DATA SOURCES

EXISTING DATA

NO NEW SURVEYS



TASK 2.1: ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

WORK BREAK-DOWN AND STRUCTURE

WP1: STATE-OF-THE-ART

WP2: TRANSPORT & ENERGY TRENDS AND TRANSLATION INTO MOBILITY INDICATORS

TASK 2.1.1: LOGISTICS / SCM TASK 2.1.2: MOBILITY/ PASSENGER TASK 2.1.3: ENERGY

TASK 2.2: IDENTIFICATION OF TRENDS

TASK 2.2.1: LOGISTICS / SCM

TASK 2.2.2: LAND USE TASK 2.2.3: MOBILITY TASK 2.2.4: ENERGY SUPPLY

TASK 2.3: IDENTIFICATION OF PARAMETERS

TASK 2.3.1: FREIGHT TRANSPORT TASK 2.3.2: PASSENGER TRANSPORT

TASK 2.3.3: IMPACT ON ENERGY USE / SUPPLY

TASK 2.4: SYNTHESIS



WP2 REVISED SCHEDULETask I.D. Task Description Partners involved Month

F M A M J J A S O N D

Task 2.1 ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

Task 2.1.1 LOGISTICS / SCM AUEB / TRANSLOG

Task 2.1.2 MOBILITY/ PASSENGER ITS

Task 2.1.3 ENERGY KUL

Task 2.2 IDENTIFICATION OF TRENDS

Task 2.2.1 LOGISTICS / SCM AUEB / TRANSLOG

Task 2.2.2 LAND USE S&W

Task 2.2.3 MOBILITY STRATEC

Task 2.2.4 ENERGY SUPPLY KUL

Task 2.3 IDENTIFICATION OF PARAMETERS

Task 2.3.1 FREIGHT TRANSPORT AUEB / TRANSLOG

Task 2.3.2 PASSENGER TRANSPORT ITS

Task 2.3.3 IMPACT ON ENERGY USE / SUPPLY KUL

Task 2.4 SYNTHESIS AUEB / TRANSLOG

ORIGINAL SCHEDULE REVISED SCHEDULE



D2.1 DELIVERABLE PREPARATION PLANTABLE OF CONTENTS

WHAT BY WHOM WHEN

1.0 INTRODUCTION AUEB / TRANSLOG

2.0 METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AUEB / TRANSLOG 04 / 04

3.0 PEST ANALYSIS 06 / 04

3.1 LOGISTICS & SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AUEB / TRANSLOG

3.2 MOBILITY / PASSENGER STRATEC / ITS

3.3 ENERGY KUL

4.0 IDENTIFICATION OF TRENDS 07 / 04

4.1 LOGISTICS & SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT TRENDS AUEB / TRANSLOG

4.2 LAND USE S & W

4.3 MOBILITY STRATEC

4.4 ENERGY KUL

5.0 IDENTIFICATION OF PARAMETERS 10 / 04

5.1 FREIGHT TRANSPORT AUEB / TRANSLOG

5.2 PASSENGER TRANSPORT ITS

5.3 ENERGY KUL

6.0 SYNTHESIS – CONCLUSIONS AUEB / TRANSLOG 12 / 04



WP2 MANAGEMENT ISSUES (1)

TEMPLATE FOR REPORTING WORK STATUS AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS:

Organization <Title of your organization>

Task assigned <Title of task assigned to you>

Planned completion date <Foreseen date for completing the task according to WP planning>

Progress made to date <Provide (in bullet format) a description of what has been accomplished until now, e.g.

- reviewed materials- sources used

- identified issues etc.)

Problems encountered <Provide problems associated with the implementation of your task, if any?

Expected deviation from the plan

S & W (LAND USE)

AUEB / TRANSLOG (SCM / LOGISTICS)



WP2 MANAGEMENT ISSUES (2)

RELATIONSHIP WITH WP1 RESULTS

WP1 DELAYS MAY AFFECT ON TIME COMPLETION OF WP2

BASED ON KOM DECISION WP2 SHOULD RECEIVE EARLY INPUT FROM WP1 IN APRIL?

THE NEW EXPECTED COMPLETION DAY OF WP2 IS DECEMBER 2004

Documents

ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG) 1 © Prof. K. ZografosLISBON MEETING 29/04/04 Transportation