Atrial Fibrillation: New Ways to Treat an Old Rhythm Disclosures: None

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Atrial Fibrillation: New Ways to Treat an Old Rhythm Disclosures: None
  • Slide 3
  • Objectives Scope of atrial fibrillation problem? General information. Negative effects? Stroke Risk Reduction. Oral anticoagulation*. Device options*. Rate vs. Rhythm Control. Rate Control*. Rhythm Control. Cardioversion. Medications*. Ablation*. Practical Management. *: New Treatments
  • Slide 4
  • Epidemiology and Prognosis Most common sustained arrhythmia 2.2 million in US Last 20 years, 66% increase in admissions for a-fib 0.4-1% prevalence (up to 8% in those older than 80) Incidence: 0.1% per year 80 y/o Prognosis: Increased risk of stroke (5-fold). Increased risk of heart failure (3-fold). Double mortality rate. Diminished quality of life. Possible increased risk of dementia.
  • Slide 5
  • Dementia RiskDementia Risk AF indepenently associated with all forms of dementia 37025 consecutive patients from large database followed prospectively. 10161 (27%) developed AF 1535 (4.1%) developed dementia 5 years follow-up. Mean age 60.617.9 years
  • Slide 6
  • Dementia Risk cont.Dementia Risk cont. AF independently associated with all dementia. Highest risk of AD was in younger AF group Dementia patients had higher rates of HTN, CAD, CRI, heart failure and strokes. After dementia Dx, presence of AF = higher mortality (HR=1.38-1.45) Bunch et al., Heart Rhythm, 2010, 7: 433.
  • Slide 7
  • Stroke Risk ReductionStroke Risk Reduction
  • Slide 8
  • Oral AnticoagulationOral Anticoagulation Aspirin. Clopidogrel. Coumadin. Novel Oral Anticoagulants. Dabigatran (Pradaxa). Rivaroxaban (Xarelto). Apixaban (Eliquis).
  • Slide 9
  • Procedure/Device Therapy for Stroke Risk Reduction. Surgical LAA amputation. Watchman LAA occlude. Amplatzer Cardiac Plug. Lariat LAA amputation.
  • Slide 10
  • Lariat LAA LigationLariat LAA Ligation
  • Slide 11
  • LAA Occlusion: Amplatzer Cardiac Plug Jain AK, Gallagher S. Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage in non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of thromboembolism: NICE guidance. Heart 2011; 97:762.
  • Slide 12
  • LAA Occlusion: Watchman Jain AK, Gallagher S. Technology and guidelines Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage in non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of thromboembolism: NICE guidance. Heart 2011; 97:762.
  • Slide 13
  • LAA Occlusion/Amputation. Surgical LAA Amputation (Garcia-Fernandez et al., Role of left atrial appendage obliteration in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a transesophageal echocardiographic study, JACC, 2003, 42: 1253) 205 patients studied retrospectively after mitral valve replacement + LAA amputation. Stroke after 6 years was 3% (vs. 17% for those without LAA amputation. For the most part, standard of care at time of mitral valve surgery in patient with h/o atrial fibrillation. Limited data on stand-alone surgery.
  • Slide 14
  • LAA Occlusion/Amputation. Watchman: Protect AF trial Non-inferiority, 700 patients randomized 2:1. CHADS score of 1 or greater. Primary efficacy and primary safety endpoints. Concerns about safety. Not yet FDA approved. Amplatzer Cardiac Plug Lariat LAA amputation: some safety data, limited efficacy data.
  • Slide 15
  • Rate and Rhythm ControlRate and Rhythm Control
  • Slide 16
  • What should be driver for deciding between rhythm control and rate control strategy? 1.Desire to avoid anticoagulation. 2.Alter long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation. 3.Control of symptoms related to atrial fibrillation. 4.All of the above.
  • Slide 17
  • What should be main driver for deciding between rhythm control and rate control strategy? 1.Desire to avoid anticoagulation. 2.Alter long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation. 3.Control of symptoms related to atrial fibrillation. 4.All of the above.
  • Slide 18
  • Randomized, prospective 4060 patients. Rate control (80, 110 bpm) Rhythm control Age: 69.79.9 1 endpoint: overall mortality Mean f/u 3.5 years Rhythm control associated with more ADRxs, hospitalizations. AFFIRM:
  • Slide 19
  • Other Rate vs. Rhythm Trials RACE (Hagens et al., JACC, 2004, 43: 241) 522 patients, 689, no difference in composite 1 endpoint. PIAF (Hohnloser et al, Lancet, 2000, 356: 1789) 252 patients, 6110, no difference in symptoms. STAF (Carlsson et al., JACC, 2003, 41: 1690) 200 patients, 668, no difference in composite 1 endpoint. HOT CAF (Opolski et al., Chest, 2004, 126: 476) 205 patients, 6111, no difference in composite 1 endpoint.
  • Slide 20
  • AF and CHF:AF and CHF: 1376 pts (682 vs. 694) EF 35% CHF symptoms h/o atrial fibrillation 671 years old (34 pts
  • Slide 21
  • Exceptions to Rate vs. Rhythm Studies? Symptoms, Symptoms, Symptoms Patient preference. Patient expectation. Atrial fibrillation contributing/in-setting of other process CHF especially tachycardia-mediated cardimyopathy. COPD, pneumonia. Younger age? Average age of previous studies was 61-70. What is appropriate strategy in younger (