Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gas Turbine - Modular Helium Reactor Design & Safety Approach
Presented to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff
24 September 2002
Laurence L Parme Manager, Reactor Safety & Licensing
General Atomics
1 of 20 24 Sept 02 4.GENERAL ATOMICS
Attachment 3
U.S. AND EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGY BASES FOR MODULAR HIGH TEMPERATURE REACTORS
BROAD FOUNDATION OF HELIUM REACTOR TECHNOLOGY
2 of 20 24 Sept 02
Steam Cycle Gas Turbine Cycle
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
INV7d Z#HkVAwlg
aMVaNVIS 3SI21dkVO3 S37nClOkV P
LO-LZ-9 (LZ)E:Lz-vi
S31*WDAV 7vdv3N3Dzo ides j7Z oz 10 c
aoncpqlugm
("IW" UHME) AýOj) a9l PU3
QDUWJVMM pus
!I&VIlnewows jw*odjipepnN
3D Arrangement of Plant
Reactor equipment Positioner Refueling Reactor maintenance and machine auxiliary repair building building
Crane central room * 600 MW(t)- 285 MW(e)
Electrical-technical buildin 3 vessels primary
coolant system
Power conversion system integrated in single vessel
OREN* Below grade housing
• Continuously conversion cavity operating, natural syte cooling
msystem circulating, air cooled reactor cavity cooling
Reactor
Reactor building + GENERAL ATOMICS
GT -MHR COMB INE S ADVANCED REACTOR
WITH SINGLE SHAFT
GAS TURBINE BASED POWER
CON VERS ION SYSTEM
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
5 of 20 24 Sept 02 I
I
11Z
Annular Core Limits Maximum Accident Fuel Temperature
REPLACEABLE CENTRAL &SIDE REFLECT OR•.
36 X OPERATING CONT ROL RODS
CORE BARRE LE
ACTIVE CORE -.
102 COLUMNS 10OBLOCKS HIGH
PERMANENT S IDE REFLECTOýd
BORATED PINS (1YP)
REFUELING PENETRATIONS
S ART-UP L)OLRODS
Fuel Elements
.ANNULAR CORE USES EXISTING TECHNOLOGY
L-199(10) 6 of 20 24 Sept 02
6-9-95+ GENERAL ATOMICS
I
I
GT-MHR Power Conversion Uses High Efficiency Brayton Cycle
LOW PRESSURE COMPRESSOR
7 of 20 24 Sept 02L-271 (12a) 8-14-94 A-36
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
:
HEM ]
Modular Gas-Reactor Safety Approach Differs From Earlier Reactor Designs
* GT-MHR safety emphasizes
- Keeping radionuclides at source during all accidents - Minimizing reliance on active/complex engineered systems
• Passive safety design is based on reoptimized application of established HTGR technology - High temperature fuel and core - Single phase, chemically & neutronically inert coolant - Specially tailored core power and geometry
Conservative, robust design with defense-in
depth remain foundations of safety
8 of 20 24 Sept 02 +.GENERAL ATOMICS
Key to GT-MHR Safety Multiple Ceramic Fuel Coatings
Pyrolytic Carbon Silicon Carbide
-- Porous Carbon Buffer
- Uranium Oxycarbide
TRISO Coated fuel particles (left) are formed into fuel compacts (center) and inserted into graphite fuel elements (right).
PARTICLES COMPACTS FUEL ELEMENTS
+ GENERAL ATOMICSL-029(5) 9 of 20 24 Sept 02
4-14-94
III II III II III
III 'I III II III
Coated ParticlesEven at Very High
Remain Intact Temperatures
� 4 � -- '-'�r :---.- - -
2600FUEL TEMPERATURE (°C)
10 of 20 24 Sept 02 + GENERAL ATOMICS
1.0
0.8z 0
LU LL uJ -I
IUL
0.6
0.4
0.2
0L1 1000
L-266(1) 7-28-94 W-9
Safety Focused on Assured Fuel Particle Integrity
* Fission (heat generation) shut down assured by - Large negative temperature coefficient 1 Passive - Large temperature margins JShutdown
• Heat removal assured by - Low power density & module thermal - Annular core and high LID ratio
Passive Cooling
* Chemical attack limited by - Absence of high pressure water sources - Nuclear graphite, core geometry, and limited air availability
11 of 20 24 Sept 02 4.GENERAL ATOMICS
Multiple Means Available to Control Heat Generation
* Control rods capable of terminating fission
* Reserve shutdown system provides independent and diverse means of terminating fission
• Large negative temperature coefficient and large core temperature margins can provide passive shutdown for anticipated transient without scram
12 of 20 24 Sept 02 GENERAL A TOMICS
Heat Generation Stops During Loss of Cooling Without Rod Motion
TIME (DAYS) 2
49
TIME (HOURS)
+ GENERAL ATOMICS13 of 20 24 Sept 02
0 I 3I I I I
NO REACTOR SCRAM Pressurized Loss of Forced Cooling 350 MW(t) MHTGR
450
r~n i-,
S40
30 CD
20 C30
10 CL
0' -1
Power controlled by negative temperature coefficient
REACTOR RECRITICAL
6 0 16 32 64 s0 96 112
I
I
'4ýý
Core Temperatures Maintained at Safe Levels With and Without Reactor Trip
50 100
TIME (HOURS)
+ GENERAL ATOMICS14 of 20 24 Sept 02
2000
0 LuJ
R 1500
LUJ I-L
1000
5000
Multiple Means Available to Remove Core Heat
Power conversion loop provides normal heat rejection - Normal operation
- Preferred mode of shutdown cooling - Operates with pressurized or depressurized coolant
* Shutdown cooling system offers alternative means of forced circulation heat removal
* Passive heat rejection to Reactor Cavity Cooling assures safety for all events
• Passive heat rejection to the surroundings limits maximum consequences
2GENERAL ATOMICS 15 of 20 24 Sept 02+
Passive Heat Removal Changes Reactor Design Philosophy
LARGE HTGRs r3000 MW(tUl
.O FSV [842 MW(T)]
PEACH BOTTOM [115 MW(T)]
1967 1973 1980
RADIONUCLIDE RETENTION IN
FIIEL PARTICLES
0 C.
w
UJ CL 2
I-w
0 I
z 0 Z5
C.) M
1985
CHRONOLOGY
SIZED AND CONFIGURED TO WITHSTAND EVEN A SEVERE ACCIDENT
1-222(1) 161of 20 24 Sept 02 1-12-96
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
4000
MHR
3000
2000
1000
4000
3000
1000
I
jw.At3'VP II'Viiii ,
.L. I P%" I i%06-L-17I
,///////2000
II I I
Temperature Gradient Provides Driving Force for Residual Heat Removal
600 MW/102 Column- I -I I
-------Central
Central Reflector
I I I I I
"--- Mm''
Core Barrel I
RSR RSR IPSR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110120130
Radius (inches)
3500
3000
2500 0 4-J
2000 CL
1500 E
1000
140 150
+ GENERAL ATOMICS17 of 20 24 Sept 02
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
0
a) 3
4-'
3
a) E a) F-
400
200
mr-
5 ff 2 -JI _I. 91500
a am
I Vessel
FUEL TEMPERATURES REMAIN BELOW DESIGN LIMITS DURING LOSS OF COOLING EVENTS
2
Time After Initiation (Days)
passive design ensures fuel remains below 1600 0C
18 of 20 24 Sept 02L-340(3) 11-16-94
+GENERAL ATOMICS
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
E-4 0)
o~ a)
800
6000
Risk From Water Ingress Significantly Reduced in GT-MHR
* No steam generators therefore no high pressure steam source
• Precooler and intercooler water pressure below primary coolant operating pressure
* Low water pressure in heat exchangers greatly reduces potential for water ingress during normal operation
* Liquid water transport to core under depressurized conditions limited by geometry
19 of 20 24 Sept 02 4.GENERAL ATOMICS
Inherent and Passive Features Control Air Attack
"* Non-reacting coolant (helium)
"* Embedded ceramic coated particles
"* Air ingress limited (requires failure of Class 1 vessels)
"• Below grade, closed reactor silo (isolation)
"* Air flow rate limited by core flow area (LID > 700)
"* Slow oxidation rate (nuclear grade graphite)
2 4GENERAL ATOMICS 20 of 20 24 Sept 02+
Low Potential for Graphite Fires
"• Test results successfully compared favorably to computer code (AlP) predictions
"• Extremely low probability of burning graphite - requires temperatures above those during
operation or accidents, and - requires large quantities of air
"• MHTGR analyses show introduction of air results in limited, decay heat driven oxidation
21 of 20 24 Sept 02 +,GENERAL ATOMICS
Graphite Oxidation Limited by Available Air
CROSS DUCT VESSEL FAILURE-
- INGRESS OF ONE SILO VOLUME
- OXIDATION MINIMAL
- OXIDATION SMALL
,OPENING AT TOP - INGRESS OF ONE VESSEL VOLUME
- NEGLIGIBLE OXIDATION
OPENING AT BOTTOM
- NO INGRESS
- NO OXIDATION
+ GENERAL ATOMICS22 of 20 24 Sept 02
Mass Transfer, Core Temperature, & Graphite Purity Limit Oxidation Rate
20 25
LU
C)
C/3
8
LS
0.05 <
30
TIME PAST INITIATING EVENT (DAYS)
+GENERAL ATOMICS23 of 20 24 Sept 02
1 0I
10-1
10-2
10-3
10-4
LU
LU
LU
CL
LU
LL.
z
LL.
22 FT2 CROSSDUCT VESSEL FAILURE WITH UNLIMITED AIR SUPPLY (APP. G.4)
22 FT2 CROSSAUCT VESSEL FAILURE (APRP.4)A
13 IN.2 RELIEF VALVE FAILURE (DBE-IO)
n0.05 IN.2 INSTRUMENT LINE LEAK (DDE-l)
10-50 5 10 15
I I
With Fuel Damage Precluded, Accident Releases Limited to Lesser Sources
"• Fission products within particles with initially defective coatings (as-manufactured defect fraction)
"* Fission products within particles experiencing inservice particle failure
"* Fission products associated with Uranium contamination of graphite
* Activity in primary coolant
* Activity "plated-out" on coolant boundary surfaces during normal operation
240of 20 24Sept02 + GENERAL ATOMICS
Below-Grade Siting Augments Enhanced Safety
Reactor equipment Positioner Refueling Reactor maintenance and machine auxiliary repair building building ° Reduced seismic
Crane central room response
Electrical-technical n Effective heat sink using
.. , surrounding earth
p. Robust structure - Additional containment
of accident releases 7,-Limited vulnerability of
core and key safety features to surface Po-wer Reactor
conversion fcavity events system -cooling
system Limits oxidant ingress
Ratbuln+ GN ALTMReactor
Reactor building + GENERAL ArTOMICS
GT-MHR Optimization of Established Gas Reactor Features Provides
* Enhanced, easily understood safety
• Assured accomplishment of safety functions with simple, passive features
• Limited consequences, even for beyond design basis accidents
Cost of passive features offset by
design simplicity and modularity
260of120 24 Sept 02 + GENERAL ATOMICS
G T-MHR Project Update
and Pre-Application Objectives
Presented to NRC Staff 24 September 2002
Walter Simon Senior Vice President, Power Reactor Division
General Atomics
+ GENERAL ArTOMICS
:Attachment 4
GT-MHR Design Development An International Program
S....___________.. ..... ' - • •• • • •. , • -- .. •L• .. .. . -. . ...... • ,,•, •....
o Engineering in Russia under joint US/RF agreement for destruction of surplus weapons Plutonium
• Sponsored jointly by US (DOE) and RF (Minatom) with support from provided
V by Japan and EU
Ky~aae~au ýOKBMv
+uGcmuEym ALATOIC
+GENERAL ATOMIfCS
Preliminary Design Completed
"* System design requirements and component specifications established
"* System configurations and component layouts developed
"• Nuclear, thermal, and structural analyses prepared
"• Technology development plans in-place
"* Test articles, test facilities and rigs are being developed
"• Bench-Scale fuel facility construction initiated
"• Subcontractors selected in key areas and assisting with hardware development
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
Design Effort is 40% Complete
• More than 1800 work products (10,000 pages) completed.
• Includes more than 300 drawings, 80 development test plans & 100 analysis reports.
• More than 30 meetings of US and Russian engineers to discuss design details held
• Detailed schedule with more than 6000 activities prepared.
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
Final Design Begun Major Items in Next Phase Planning
"• Continue final design of systems and components
"• Initiate reactor and Power Conversion Unit (PCU) development tests
"• Continue structural material development for vessel, reactor, and Power Conversion Unit components
"* Perform validation of computer codes
"* Start physics validation tests
"* Complete Bench-Scale Fuel Facility & test fuel
"* Complete initial plot plan, plant layout, building arrangements and auxiliary system designs
"• Initiate reactor irradiation tests of fuel, graphite, and carbon-carbon composites
O'GENERAL ATOMICS
U.S. Effort Aimed at Commercializing Russian Developed Design
• GT-MHR industrial consortium for US deployment being pursued
* Potential users of GT-MHR - Providing input on design
- Supporting very long lead activities (e.g., licensing)
GT-MHR Utility Advisory Board (UAB) includes 35% ofUS nuclear cap
Enteigy
)acity
PDominion- a Prog
ConstollaUon NWx~ar
ress Energy
* DOE/I National Labs supporting generic gas cooledreactor technologies
+ GENERAL ArTOMICS
4 m
PSEG
Objective & Expectations for GT-MHR Pre-Application Interaction
* Familiarize staff with GT-MHR technology
• Identify and resolve key, GT-MHR specific, licensing issues as early as possible
* Leverage ongoing DOE and NEI activities for GTMHR applicability
• Candid dialogue between NRC staff and design team
• Receive NRC feedback on GT-MHR approach to safety assurance
Prepare way for commercialization of GT-MHR
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
Key Areas Seen As...
"• GT-MHR Source Term - Coated particle fuel
- Use of mechanistic release model
- GT-MHR containment system including reactor building
"* Import of non-US technology including use of test data from outside US
"• Licensing approach and unique aspects of modular reactor licensing
Ideally, pre-application aimed at GT-MHR specific subtopics not covered by DOE & NEI efforts
+ GENERAL ATOMICS
.. ,.X.-