11
Audience Feedback Eloise Hatton

Audience feeback

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Audience feeback

Audience Feedback

Eloise Hatton

Page 2: Audience feeback

1. Do you think the artist I have used are suitable for the rap/hip-hop genre?

Yes No

Series1 10 0

1

3

5

7

9

11

Series1

On this graph we can evidently see that 10 people thought that I had used a suitable artist for my front cover and throughout my magazine. Nobody thought I had chosen the wrong type of character. Therefore, this puts a positive affect towards my magazine.

Page 3: Audience feeback

2. What is the strongest/weakest part of my front cover?

Strongest:• Chosen Artist• Chosen amount of limited colours to keep it simple• Good use of direct address• Artist on the front cover links in with the genre (rap/hip-hop)• Clear background makes everything stand out

Weakest:• More cover lines• Website address is too small

Page 4: Audience feeback

3.What is the strongest/weakest part of my contents page?

Strongest:• Layout• Limited amount of colours to keep everything straight forward• Artists outfits suit the genre (rap/hip-hop)• Colour scheme links in with the whole magazine

Weakest:• More regulars• Too many dark colours• Some images look like they take over the main image of P.G.

Page 5: Audience feeback

4. What is the strongest/weakest part of my DPS?

Strongest:• Colour co-ordinated• Header links in with the artist and genre and reinforces it’s a music magazine• Positioning of image• Layout• “Professor Green” has been coloured green

Weakest:• Out of focused image• Amount of text

Page 6: Audience feeback

5. Do you think the images I have used suit the rap/hip-hop genre?

Yes

No

0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5Yes No

Series1 10 0

10

0

Series1

Once again, this graph shows positivity towards my magazine. Out of everybody I asked ‘Do you think the images I have used suit the rap/hip-hop genre’ agreed. Clearly showing on my graph, 10 people said yes and 0 people said no.

Page 7: Audience feeback

6. Would you change anything about the layout and why?

2

8

Yes No

On this doughnut graph, only 2 out of the 10 people I surveyed would change the layout. However, 8 people stated they that wouldn’t.

Page 8: Audience feeback

7. Do you think £4.50 is an appropriate price for this magazine?

Yes No

Series1 8 2

0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

6.5

7.5

Series1

On this graph it is shown that 8/10 people who I questioned thought £4.50 is an appropriate price for my ‘BEATS’ magazine. However, 2/10 people disagree.

Page 9: Audience feeback

8.Based on the front cover would you buy this magazine?

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.20

2

4

6

8

10

12

10

0

Series1

To make this graph more clear people said that based on how I have designed my front cover for my music magazine, they would buy it. Positively, nobody said that they would not. Therefore, I can now believe that I have designed my front cover to match my genre.

Page 10: Audience feeback

9. Do you think this magazine would appeal to the target audience of 16-34 year olds?

Yes

No

1 3 5 7 9 11Yes No

Series1 10 0

10

0

Series1

Page 11: Audience feeback

10. Do you think there are enough articles on the contents page?

Yes No

Series1 10 0

0.51.52.53.54.55.56.57.58.59.5

10

0

Series1

Looking at my feedback I can see here that I got a positive response from my audience, therefore I believe I have got enough information on my contents page.