Audit 1 Comp

8/2/2019 Audit 1 Comp

1/17

Gharpure Engineering & Construction (P) Ltd.

1st

AUDIT COMPLAINCE

DATE : 12.12.11 to 14.12.11

Name of Client: NMMC

Name of Auditor:INDIAN REGISTER OF SHIPPING (IRS)

Name of work : Under the integrated Development of sewerage

system in Navi Mumbai municipal corporation area ( Underground

sewerage system for NMMC) Providing of sewer network &

improvement of sewage system in Turbhe & Vashi ward

Constructing, Erecting and Commissioning of Sewage TreatmentPlant of avg. advance technology including operation and

Maintenance for 3 years at Sector 20, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai.

The above documents were seen for the period of 20.08.2009 to

31.05.2010


2/17

1st

AUDIT COMPLAINCE

SR

NO.

OBSERVATION RAISED BY IRS COMPLAINCE REMARK

CIVIL WORK6.0 Methodology & Quality Assurance Plan:

I. It is stated by the contractor that tenderconditions do not specify preparation ofmethodology for the work, hencemethodology is not prepared.

II. It is suggested that contractor shallprepare a methodology for each andevery item of the BOQ to know how theitems will be executed by means ofmethodology of the sequence etc.

III. It is obligatory on the part of contractorto prepare QAP within 14 days fromcommencement of work and as suchQAP is prepared by the contractor butnot approved by PMC / NMMC.

IV. It is further noticed that many points arenot being complied as stated in the QAPprepared by the contractor though it isclaimed that QAP is prepared for theirown guidance.

Methodology attached.

(Pg No. 1)


(Pg No. 1)

PMC APPROVED

COPY ATTACHED


(Pg No. 1)

7.0 Control of Data and Documentation:

a) Base Documents:i) Tender copy Vol. I & IIii) Work Order copyiii) STP billing break up

(Approved)

iv) Correspondence filev) Daily progress reports

b) Technical Documents:A. STPi) Concrete consumption register-

Day to day concreteconsumption of various gradesof concrete is maintained inregister.

ii) Soil investigation report-Soilinvestigation was carried out byM/s. Geotechnical Solutions inNovember 2009 & December2009. & soil investigation reports

along with bore samples areavailable at siteiii) Cube testing register-

Cube test register ismaintained at site.

Already shown at theaudit time.

Already shown at the

audit time. Already shown

at the audit time. Already

shown at the audit time.


audit time.



audit time.




3/17

iv) Reinforcement steel challan file

is maintained at site .

v) Compaction test record compaction test record ismaintained layerwise.

vi) R.C.C. Pipe File- R.C.CPipe invoice along withmanufacturers testrecord is maintained

vii) Batch record file Datewise concrete batchrecord is maintained

viii) Mix design file RMCconcrete was procured

from Lafarge, Ultratech,and RMC India. Mixdesign from Lafarge,Ultratech, and RMCIndia was approved byPMC M/s. Tandon &Associates.

ix) Level Register: - level recordshould be documented in levelregister to verify on going work

as per drawing at any stage ofconstruction.

x) Instruction book- Instructionbook should be maintained atsite to record suggestions ofsenior officers visit / theirobservations of ongoing works &compliances of the same.

xi) Drawing file- Various Drawingfiles are maintained as pervarious units of sewagetreatment plant. All drawingsprepared by M/S S. N. GharpureEngg. & const. pvt. Ltd. &checked for dimension & levelsby SFC EnvironmentalTechnologies Pvt. Ltd(Technology provider fromAustria for SNG) & Only RCCproof checked by IIT p forapproval of Consultant (Tandon& assoc.) stamped by PMC, theapproval from NMMC shall besuitably furnished.

audit time.


audit time.


audit time.


audit time.


audit time.

NOTED.

Site instruction book is

maintained & photo

copy are attached

herewith Pg. No. 5

Drawing file available at

site. NMMC approval

work is under progress.

Noted.

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL


4/17

xii) The contractor has furnished usthe list of associated consultantsviz. C-Tech TechnologyConsultant, BEP consultant GA &RCC consultant, Sewer NetworkConsultant, Geo technicalconsultant, Electrical &Instrumentation Consultant.

However RCC proof checking &BEP approval is done by IIT &rest of the works are handled bysole agencies as mentionedabove without the requirementof further checking.

xiii) Stage passing particularly strataapproval record for footing byPMC is not reflected in RFI. TheRFI only mentions the item of

work e.g. PCC, plinth beam orany other foundation but doesnot throw light on strataapproval.

Shuttering/reinforcement checked/approvedetc. The general remark of inspection passedis ticked in the RFI which in fact should havebeen more elaboratetaking into the accountabove aspects of importance.B . UGD

Under mentioned documentswere found maintained at site.

a. Approved General masterplan/cross section

b. Challans along with MTCs forpipes/materials

c. Level registerd. Cube test registere. Approval/testing of pipes recordf. Bill recordg. Source approval record

Remark: in addition to above somerecords not available during audit areas follows.

i) approved hydro test recordii) approval for bitumen macadam

RFI attached. (Pg. No. 6a,6b)

OK.


audit time.


audit time.


audit time.Already shown at the

audit time.


audit time.

XEROX ATTACHED. (Pg.

No 8)

XEROX ATTACHED.

(Pg. No 9)

8.0 Plants and Equipments deployed at site:The site laboratory has the

following equipments -1. Cube moulds

(150mmx150mmx150mm)-40 nos.2. CTM of capacity 1000KN3. Sieves-1 set4. Core cutter5. Oven6. weighing Balance of capacity 10Kg.7. Slump cone-3 nos.


audit time.


audit time.


audit time.


audit time.

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL


5/17

Remark: Quality control lab has beenestablished at site. All necessary equipmentswere available at site. However validcalibration of Cube moulds Sieves, Slumpcone, etc was not available. Only Calibration ofCTM on 27-4-10 by Allied services & corecutter on 13-5-10 by Technical & scientificsales were available.

Now SIEVE CALIBRATION

is done at site &

certificates are attached.

(Pg. No. 22)

9.0 Testing and Quality Control ofmaterials & Products:

A. Soil investigationa. M/S Geotechnical Solutions conducted

geotechnical investigation and submittedreport No.IZ/GECL/SPD/STP/G-775Bdtd.15th Nov.2009. For this purpose BH 1to BH 7 =seven bore holes wereexecuted for ascertaining the sub profiles& BH 8 was made in the location ofpump house. Since structure of SBR is

located within the existing maturationponds (lagoons) column footings at theweathered rock level are recommendedfor supporting major units.

b. The execution of exploratory bore holes& the laboratory investigation werecarried out by M/s. DBM Geotechnics &construction. Pvt. Ltd.The observationsby the consultants are as under:

The ground water table

recorded during exploratory drilling ofholes was + 4.5 m RL. Since the pondswere almost full during investigation &the shallow ground water table duringinvestigation is expected to be due tothe pond. The surrounding areas are atlower level & the actual ground watertable should be much below +4.5m RL.The trial pit excavation made up to theweathered rock recorded water at +1.5mRL. The shallow ground water table is

expected to be due to the rains at thetime of investigation, hence the groundwater table at +2.00m RL(about 2.2mbelow FGL) may be used in the design offoundation & different structures.

c. The chemical analysis of Soil & groundwater:

The sulphates & chloride values arehigher than the allowable limits up towhich special precautions for foundation

concrete are not required. Precaution forsafe guarding the concrete & steel fromthe chemical attack shall be taken in theconstruction. However no specialconsideration appears to have been


audit time.


audit time.

Photographs are

attached. (Pg. No. )

NIL

NIL

NIL


6/17

done.Since the invert level of the

basin is +4.175 m RL the C-tech basin isproposed to be supported on columnfootings while the bed is designed assuspended slab. The recommendedfoundations level for the footings is+0.8m RL & SBC recommended is

40T/m2.The column height up to the base slabmay be of 2.2m & no intermediate tie forcolumns necessary.

d. Plate load tests are conducted forfoundation & the results show.

i.Ultimate bearing capacity as 136.96T/m2 & safe BC 46.65 T/m2 as withFOS- 3 So recommended SBC is 45T/m2 at a depth of 3m.

ii.For C-tech Basin No.2 & 4 Ultimate BCobserved 154.08 T/m2 with SBC as51.36 T/m2 with FOS-3. So SBCrecommended is 45 T/m2

iii.2nd Plate load test shows Ultimate BC as136.96 T/m2 & SBC as 40 T/m2 withFOS 3.

iv. For Blower room -Ultimate BC observed154.08 T/m2 SBC as 51.36 T/m2e. For staff Quarter the soil testing is done

through Oriental Consulting Engg. Alsofor all above tests the SBC is recommendedas 7 T/m2 at a depth of 4m below EGL.

B. Observation on Concreterecord of STP -

a) Observation on Mix Design:-Suppliers NameUltratechMC(India)Godrej

b) Physical & chemical tests records inindependent lab for RMC suppliers:

Supplier's NameUltratechRMC India

Remark:

1. RMC concrete was procured fromLafarge , Ultratech, RMC India &mix design from Lafarge ,Ultratech,RMC India was approved by PMC

M/s. Tandon & Associates.2. Mix design from Lafarge & trial mixrecord of Ultratech, RMC India,Godrej was available during audit &following are the observation


audit time.

MIX DESIGN COPY

ATTACHED. (Pg. No. )

CHEMICAL & PHYSICAL

TEST COPY ATTACHED.

(Pg. No.)


audit time.


audit time.


audit time.

NIL

NIL

NIL


7/17

3. Trial mix test sheet and cube testresults attached with the mix designfrom Lafarge.

4. Physical properties & chemical testreports for Fine and coarseaggregate, cement, admixture and

water are attached with only mixdesign report from Lafarge.

5. Physical & chemical test records ofingredients of concrete from RMCsuppliers viz. Ultratech , RMC Indiaare not available with trial mixrecords to ascertain therequirements as per IS 10262.

6. Combined gradation of ingredientof concrete as per IS 10262 has notbeen enclosed with mix design.

7. Concrete mix design is notapproved by NMMCofficials.

c) Concrete Test

Remark:i. Frequency of concrete

cube test for all gradesmaintained as per IS456:2000.

ii. Independent lab testswere not carried out.

iii. Standard deviation wasnot computed on site.


audit time.

Attached. ( Pg.

No 41)

Attached. (Pg. No. 32 to40)

Mix design copies of

various grade M20 to

M35, all RMC suppliers

copies are submitted to

NMMC for approval.


audit time.

Independent test has

been carried out in PWD

for M20, M30, M35 grade

& Photo copies are

attached. (Pg. No. 7)

Standard deviation is now

computed. Standard

Deviation found 2.27 (i.egood quality) Photo copy

attached. (Pg. No. 7)

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

d) Verification of concrete records: following concrete work quality records

& its correlation has been verified .

Sr.No. Details of record For M25 For M35 REMARK

1 date of concrete 22-4-10 23-3-10

2 structure name

Blower

foundation C-tech footing


8/17

3 level record not available not available

Level record is being

traced & will be

submitted in next

audit.

4 RMC supplier Lafarge Godrej

5 batch slip available available

6 time of concreting 19:25 to 00.25 13.30 to 14.45

7 approved drawing available available

8 RFI not available not available

M35 AVAILABLEM25 RFI HAS BEENMISPLACED

9 BBS available available

10 theoretical quantity not mentioned not mentioned

Now theoreticalquantities are

calculated &

mentioned in

concrete pour card.

11 actual quantity 42 cu.m. 18 cu.m.

12 slump record available available

13 cube taken 12 12

Frequency of casting

cubes are nowfollowed as per ISper 456:2000.

14 cube results

7 days in N/mm2 20.52 30.44 & 30.73

28 days in N/mm2 31.4 42.29

e) Concrete batch recordi. Concrete batch slips of

Lafarge, Ultratech, RMCIndia, and Godrej havebeen reviewed & it isobserved that slumprecord at plant is notmentioned on batch slips.

ii. Slump record ismaintained in concreteregister at site.

Water added at the

time of concrete batch

as per mix design

record. However

slump record in batch

slip is not mentioned.

Noted. NIL


9/17

C Epoxy applicationrecord:

Records of epoxy application onconcrete structure such as challansand thickness check are notavailable during audit.

Epoxy challan are now

available at site with

MTC.

D. Backfilling:Records of backfilling work

for concrete structures such aschallans, consumption registerand thickness check are notavailable during audit.

E. Rock anchoring:PULL OUT test conducted for SPSSH-1, Wet well. Drawing no.SNG/NMMC/SAN/RCC/32(RO). Total101 nos. (32 mm dia rock anchorshaving 18T tension capacity) for wetwell. Rock anchors of 32 dia. are

spaced 1250mm x 1250mm &985mm x 1250mm in a 14000mminternal dia. of well. Note on theabove drawing states that groutingto be done with MC-Expacrete asper manufacturers instruction.However record was not shown &whether pressure grouting or gravityflow grouting was resorted to, notmentioned on the drawing.

As per drawing note During

construction floatation ofstructure due to sub soil waterlogging of site shall beprevented & stable equilibriumof the structure shall beensured & in detail of anchorthe test to be conducted fortension is 18 tones withoutspecifying no. of bars to besubjected to tests.Only 4 bars (Anchor bars No.44, 55

& 73, 84) as above drg. tested withRFI dtd.28-4-10 in the presence ofPMC, NMMC. Each anchor bar istested for 27KN load. However noinstruction of actual no. of testing tobe done is specified anywhere. Only4 bars tested out of 101 anchor i.e.4% approx. testing which shouldhave been at least 30%.

Further the report (4.9.3) statesthat the backfilling between the wet

well wall and the rock cutting can bedone using lean concrete containingfly ash and cement so that thelateral pressure on the wall is limitedto the water pressure. This could not


audit time.

Challan and MTC is

attached. Pg. No


audit time.

Designer has made allconsideration for

lateral pressure on

wall, so there is no any

requirement.

NIL

NIL


10/17

be ascertained.

F.Reinforcement steelReinforcement steel records up to 31-5-10

Dia. of

steel

in mm

Received

in lots

Total

Qty.

in MT.

Remark

8 8 52.49 All ITCs from structwel are available

10 6 53.33 One lot failed in yield stress & returned vide challan

no. 468 dtd. 16-4-10

12 9 114.87 all passed & Thane TMT(old) failed in yield stress

16 10 204.98

TC-31343-44 dtd.25-3-10 TMX 4076/dtd.14.3.10, 3

specimen tested

20 13 112.39 From Thane TMT(in Structwel) & TCR lab.

25 3 20.08Only one lot tested three specimen from Thane TMT 2Lots not tested (Structwel Lab.)

32 1 4.98 3 specimen tested in Structwel lab.& results found OK

The ITC from TCR engg. servicesPvt. Ltd. for the test conducted on10 mm dia. failed in 0.2% proofstress value. Value of

389.35N/mm2 tested on 11-1-10without Ref. no. but onlyAF7138.

16 mm dia. steel tested on 02-02-10 in TCR engg. Services lab.Shows yield stress value as433,423 & 415 and are borderlinecases for Fe 415 grade. Howeverthe UTS values are 569.87, 560.47& 554.18 N/mm2 & henceallowable. 12mm steel tested on05-2-10 in TCR Lab. shows Yieldstress value of three specimenshow 417.53, 388.97, 377.81

Already shown at the audit

time.

All failed reinforcement are

removed from site as per

mentioned reference of PMC

& NMMC Instruction.

NIL

NIL


11/17

N/mm2. less than the requiredmin. of 415 N/mm2 & it is writtenon test report 12mm dia. failed inTensile strength & contractor hasbeen instructed to remove thesteel from STP site by PMC.Removed from site vide challan468 dtd 16.4.2010..

10mm dia. steel tested bystructwel lab. on 05-4-10 videreport no.R&DLAB/2010/SAN0560709/0066.The values of 0.2% proof stressare 383.90, 382.61, 381.17N/mm2 showing consistent lowvalues than the required 415N/mm2 minimum. Remark in steeltesting register maintained at site

shows the material is rejected &removed from site with all 3signatures of Contractor, PMC &NMMC. Also for 12mm dia. in thesame report values are 411.83N/mm2, 410.51 N/mm2, and400.85 N/mm2 showing lowresults (border line) for ThaneFe415 old. However this testresults do not find mention in theregister. The UTS values for these

are 564.80, 569.69, 559.52N/mm2 & are acceptable. 3specimen of each dia. of bars aretested in independent lab. eitherStructwel or TCR lab. or CIDCOmaterial Testing Lab. & the resultsof 0.2% proof stress are generallyin order. Only in case of 10mm,12mm dia. steel, some lots arefailed in yield stress & removedfrom site vide challan 468 dtd. 16-4-10 of M/S Gharpure engg. &const. pvt. Ltd.In case of 16mm dia. steel lotreceived from Sumeet steel dtd.22-1-10 Qty. 9.53 MT (Gurdiansteel Pvt. Ltd. secondarymanufacturer) failed inPhosphorous content being0.093%0.06 max.. The steelregister mentions a remarkrejected & removed from sitewith signatures of contractor,

PMC, NMMC.

All failed reinforcement are

removed from site as per

mentioned reference of PMC

& NMMC Instruction.

NIL

10. Contractual Aspects:I. Tender document is made

available during the audit.II. Bar chart planning is prepared by

Already shown at the audit

time.

NIL


12/17

the contractor but not approvedby PMC / NMMC.

III. The time extension is approvedthree times.

IV. Excess and saving statement isprepared.

V. There is no variation in contractup to 31.05.2010.

VI. It is stated by the contractor thatno weekly / monthly progress isbeing submitted. however it isstated by the contractor that PMCis submitting MPR based on theinformation and facts.

VII. As per contract conditioncontractor can work is two shifts.

VIII. RFI is being maintained for eachand every activity duly signed bycontractor, PMC and NMMCengineer.

IX. Work order book is notmaintained by the contractorthough obligatory to maintain asper contract conditions.

X. PMC had some format for issuingnecessary instructions to thecontractor whenever solicited butthere is no trace of compliancesfor the instructions given by PMCengineer.

XI. QAP and safety manual is notapproved by PMC and NMMC.

XII.

Till period of 31.05.2010.Contractor has claimed two R.A.Bills and mobilization advancepayment.

No claims were made towards priceescalation.

Now Bar Chart planning

prepared & approved by

PMC. Photo copy are

attached herewith.

Noted.

Noted.

Work order book ismentioned & attached

herewith.

As per instruction given by

PMC, necessary action was

taken and complained on

work order instruction book

itself only.

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

11 SAFETY MEASURES:I. Necessary NOC is taken from the

Police Authority for partly diversion

of traffic etc. NOC was valid up to31.05.2011II. CAR and W.C. are valid policy are in

force since commencement of thework and both are valid up to20.08.2012 and 20.08.2011respectively.

III. Contractor is having a labourLicence no DC / THA / KLA / 057 /057/55 dated 18.12. 2009 is validup to 31.12.2011.

IV. It is obligatory on the part ofcontractor to submit and get

approval of safety manual fromPMC / NMMC

V. Contractor has prepared a safetymanual in general but same is notapproved by PMC / NNMC.

Noted.

Noted.

Noted.

Noted.

Noted.

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL


13/17

VI. Good record is being maintained bythe contractor for all aspects of theHSE except scaffolding procedureand is made available for theinspection.

VII. Contractor has appointed qualifiedsafety officer in HSE and fire.

VIII. Interaction with safety officer isdone.

IX. Some photos were given by thecontractor for the period up to31.05.2011. many photos revealthat no PPEs were used byworkmen.

Noted.

Noted.

Noted.

PPEs are now provided toworkers during excavation

photo proofs are attached.

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL


14/17

MECHANICAL WORKS

1) Mechanical works:1) BEP(BASIC ENGINEERING PACKAGE)

seen approved by IIT.2) Process &.Instrumentation. Diagram seen

approved by IIT3) Hydraulic calculation for pump

station/velocity calculation for pipe linesapproved by IIT.

Following machinery details checked for theperiod 21ST 2009 TO 31ST MAY 2010. frominward register and found following inconsistenciesA) Decantor :-

i. Make : Alfa lavalii. Qty : 3 Nosiii. Model : Aldec-45

1) Performance test report seen but noparticular identification on report isobserved thereby traceability can not befound

2) No approved/verified signature on anyreport of MTC of TPI

3) ( Tandon & Associates)4) As per release note, Noise level/Capacity

to be checked at site however no report

seen for the same.5) No motor certificates available.B) Agitator

Make : Fibre & Fibre productsQty : 2 Nos Motor: 1.5 Hp

Sr no :2744699/7055473Gear box : A-237

1) All certificates seen but no signature ofTPI on any certificates showingverification.( Tandon & Associates)

C) Submersible pumpMake : Aqua machineryQty : 15 NosModel/Sr no :2033DM 080:-18571

TO 18577-7 NOSANS 1023 SXM-004 :- 18582 TO

18585-4 NOS1527 DL 010 :- 18578 TO 18581-4

NOS1) Performance test/curve test report not

available for Model no 2033 DM 088 -6nos,1527 DL 010- 3NOS & ANS 1023 SXM004- 3NOS

2) All other releated documents found inorder but no signature verifying thedocuments by TPI(Tandon & Associates)

ALREADY SHOWN ON AUDIT

DATE


DATE


DATE

XEROX ATTACHED

Noise Record note is kept infile (XEROX ATTACHED)


DATE

PERFORMANCE TEST/CURVE

TEST REPORT FOR MODELNO.2033 DM 080-6 NOS 1520

DL 010-3 NOS & ANS 1023

SXM 004-3NOS-MADE

AVAILABLE & PUT IN FILE

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL


15/17

D) Submersible pumpMake: KishoreQty : 4 NosModel/Sr no :KDS 70LD 200:-83809

TO 83810-2 NOSKDS 75LD 200:-83811 TO 83812-2

NOS1) Performance test/curve test report

verified & found in order for followingModel KDS 70LD 200:-83809 TO 83810-2 NOSKDS 75LD 200:-83811 TO 83812-2

NOS

2) All other releated documents foundin order but no signature verifyingthe documents by TPI(Tandon &Associates )

E) Motor pumpMake : Jyoti Ltd

Qty : 3 Nos1)All other releated documents found

in order but no signature verifyingthe documents by TPI(Tandon &Associates ) &Mainly no entry ininward register.

F) Inward register has detail of followingmotor pump but no certificatesavailable.a) Make : W R Talwalkar

Qty : 1 NosSr no :146.08.09045Mechanical fine bar

b) Make : Jash engQty : 2 NosModel screen ZA-1135-900 6MM

2)All other releated documents foundin order but no signature verifyingthe documents by TPI(Tandon &Associates ) &Mainly no entry ininward register.

3) Data sheet/QAP verified & found ok.

SHOWN & PUT IN FILE

SIGNED BY TPI (TONDON &

ASSOCIATE)

ENTRY IN INWARD REGISTER

MADE

NOTED & WILL BE

SUBMITTED IN NEXT 4TH

AUDIT

4) 5)G).Ductile Iron PIPES----------------------XEROX ATTACHED-------

Make. Lanco Size/ Qty . 500 dia(K9) x 810.50 Mtrs

Challan no Received in mtrs Size

18491 111MTRS 500 Dia x K9


16/17

18490 108.50MTRS 500 Dia x K9

18533 161.50MTRS 500 Dia x K9

18534 157MTRS 500 Dia x K9

18538 105.50MTRS 500 Dia x K9

18562 167MTRS 500 Dia x K9

Above Details checked & found in order but no signature verfying the documents by

TPI(Tandon & Associates)

ELECTRICAL WORKS

12 Electrical ObservationsDocument referred:-Tender no.

1. Following Quality control documentsare not available.

a). Drawing register: To know theapproval status and the number ofcopies issued for site activities

b) Non-Conformityreports/Conformity records notavailable.

2. Category for the inspection of variouselectrical items eg. Transformer,Switchgear, Motor etc. indicated in thetender as A, B and C. But the Scope ofinspection under specific category is notmentioned, same to be produced.

Following Electrical items received atsite during the period 21.08.2009 to31.05.2010 as mentioned in theirinward material register.

a) Transformer (11KV/433V)-Joint Inspection report of kirloskar,Tendon & associates and NMMC wasavailable where as approved DataSheet/QAP were not available in theproject file. As per tender type testcertificate of transformer having similarconstruction and design required whereas same was not available in projectfile.

b) LT cable :- Approved data sheetand manufacturer testcertificates were not available inthe project file

c) Control panel ,PLC panel and

PMC & NMMCINSPECTED

XEROX ATTACHED


17/17

switches:- No supportingdocuments are available in theproject file

d) HT panel: - Joint Inspectionreport of ABB, Tendon &associates and NMMC wasavailable. Approved QAP/data

sheet was not available in theproject file.

e) Ultrasonic flow transmitter:-Approved data sheet wasavailable. Calibration reportsand manufacturer testcertificates were not available inthe project file

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER JUNIOR ENGG.

GHARPURE ENGG. & CONST. PVT LTD TONDON & ASSOCIATES NMMC