View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
1/9
MARY L
JANIS ZINK SARTUC CI, ET
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
2/9
MARYLJANIS ZINK SARTUC CI, ET
APPELLANTS
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
3/9
Recently, T-Mobile decinecessitating a separate utility eSuperintendent, through the MCagreement granting Com cast a utelecommun ications tower on ea
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
4/9
have an interest that is any differenhundreds of thousands of residentsno facts alleging that they would bAppellants are residents or parentsallegations to support the conclusio
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
5/9
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
6/9
3 .fhis appeal shouldAppellants' claim that they
granting utility easements to Comcor discuss the subject of "easemen
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
7/9
4.ppellants' argumseveral disjointed statements thaAppellants referred to Board Pocharge that the Policy "was violatransmission facilities" and that
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
8/9
review and approv al of Telecomm uniBoard m eetings, Respondent's Exhibi
The actions taken by the Co unapplicable law or policy. The Superinof the reasons for granting the u tility e
8/4/2019 August 18, 2011 Motion to Dismiss
9/9