Upload
dina-nasution
View
227
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
1/31
AustralasianAustralasianParliamentary EnglishParliamentary English
Debate SystemDebate System
Johanes Leonardi T., S.Pd, M.Sc
English Education Study Program
Faculty of Teacher Training & Education
WIDYA MANDALA CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY -
SURABAYA
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
2/31
Definition
A formal method ofinteractive andrepresentationalargument.
Consist of two teamsdebating over an issue,more commonly called
a topic or proposition. Encouraged in high
schools and colleges
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
3/31
The Advantages
A means of encouraging
critical thinking. A means of personal
expressions.
Tolerance of others'opinions.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
4/31
Formation
Affirmative
Team
Negative
Team
Adjudicators
Chair Person Time Keeper
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
5/31
Australasian Debating
Affirmative:
1st Speaker
2nd Speaker
3rd Speaker
Reply Speaker
Negative:
1st Speaker
2nd Speaker
3rd Speaker
Reply Speaker
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
6/31
Speech Delivery
Substantive Speech:
5-8 minutes
Reply Speech:
3-5 minutes
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
7/31
Affirmative (The Government)
Has the right to definethe motion.
Support it with
constructive arguments.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
8/31
Negative (The Opposition)
Oppose the motion
defined by the
Affirmative. Build a counter-case
against the Affirmative.
Challenge the definition
if invalid only.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
9/31
Motion (Topic)
A prepositional statement
that determines what adebate shall be about:
That we should give
President SBY a chance.
That American pop culture isa threat to civilization.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
10/31
Defining the Motion
Must be debatable.
Must not a bizarre
distortion of the motion.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
11/31
Defining the Motion
That what goes up must come down.
what being the President of RI.
goes up takes power come down step down from the
power
That the Indonesian presidencyshould be limited to 2 terms
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
12/31
Challenging the Definition
Truistic Tautological/ Circular
Squirreling
Time & Place Setting
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
13/31
Truistic Definition
It is true by nature thus make the
arguments unarguable.
That we should eat, drink, and bemerry.
That we should eat because
otherwise we starve to death; drinkbecause otherwise we would die; and
be merry because we are alive.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
14/31
Tautological/Circular Definition
The given definition is circling to the
motion.
That technology is killing our work
ethic.
That all scientific advancements that
make life easier and therefore kill our
work ethic are killing our work ethic.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
15/31
Squirreling Definition
It isnt tied down to the spirit of the
motion & doesnt have a proper logicallink to the motion.
That the USA is opening up to the PRC.
USA: Untidy Students of Asia PRC: Pretty Room Cleaners
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
16/31
Time & Place Setting Definition
The subject matter of the debate
cannot be confined to a very particular
time & place.
Limiting the subject matter to only the
economic development of Japan
during the specific period of the Meijirestoration.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
17/31
Theme Line
It is the underlying logic of a teamscase.
Used to prove a teams stand on themotion. Key question: Why is it true? Indonesias presidency should be
limited to 2 terms in respect todemocracy, balance of power, andworld changes.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
18/31
Team Split
Distribution of arguments
to the 1st, 2nd, 3rd speaker.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
19/31
Argumentation
The process of explainingwhy a point of view should
be accepted.
Valid by its supporting
logic & facts.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
20/31
Good argumentation
Relevance
Organization Consistency & internal
logic
Clarity
Effective use ofevidence
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
21/31
Rebuttal
The process of proving
that the opposing teams
arguments should beaccorded less weight
than its claim.
Showing how & why the
oppositions arguments
are invalid.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
22/31
Rebuttal: The arguments are
Based on a wrong of facts/
interpretation of facts.
Irrelevant to the topic.
Illogical.
Involving unacceptable implications.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
23/31
Role of the First Speaker
Affirmative:
Defines the motion.
Presents the teams theme line
why the case is logically correct.
Outlines the team split.
Delivers 1st substantial argument.
Provide a brief summary of the case.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
24/31
Role of the First Speaker
Negative:
Accepts/challenges the definition.
Rebut 1st affirmatives arguments. Presents the theme line.
Outlines the theme split.
Delivers 1st substantial arguments. Provides a brief summary.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
25/31
Role of the Second Speaker
Affirmative:
Rebuts the 1st negatives arguments.
Restates the affirmative teams case.
Delivers 2nd substantial speech.
Provides a brief summary.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
26/31
Role of the Second Speaker
Negative:
Rebuts the two affirmative speakers. Restates the teams case.
Delivers the 2nd substantial
arguments. Provides a brief summary.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
27/31
Role of the Third Speaker
Affirmative:
Rebuts the two negative speakers.
Restates the theme line & the two
speakers arguments.
Summarizes the issues of the debate.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
28/31
Role of the Third Speaker
Negative:
Rebuts all three affirmative speakers.
Restates the theme line & the two
speakers arguments.
Summarizes the issues of the debate
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
29/31
Reply Speakers
Provide an overview of the debate. Identify the issues by both sides.
Provide a biased adjudication of the
debate.
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
30/31
Adjudication
The process of
determining whichteam wins the debate.
Matter: 40
Manner: 40
Method: 20
7/31/2019 Austral Asian Parliamentary English Debate System
31/31
HAPPY DEBATING!!!