1
The Customer From the time it was founded, Nippon Seiki has extended its business, focusing on the development and manufactur- ing in-vehicle instrumentation. Nippon Seiki’s technologi- cal competence in this field is highly rated, and as a leading manufacturer of instrument panels it supplies a large num- ber of automobile and motorcycle manufacturers. The Challenge Reducing ECU testing man-hours while simultaneously im- proving quality of overall testing With growing computerization in automobiles, instrument panels are moving toward multifunctionality. That is why manual ECU test execution, pass/fail detection, and creating reports took a huge amount of time. This has resulted in in- creased ECU testing man-hours, and their reduction has be- come a major issue. The Solution Automation of ECU Testing using the CANoe Test Feature Set CANoe, provided by Vector, is used by a large number of cus- tomers who develop in-vehicle ECUs. The CANoe Test Feature Set is designed to automate ECU stimulation, pass/failure detection and test report generation. To solve the issue of increased man-hours, the following proposal was made to Nippon Seiki: Test samples: Delivery of a total of five test samples, includ- ing a CAN Message Synchronization Test, Diagnostic Test, and Gateway Test. Training of employees involved in testing. Technical support: In the context of technical support for customers with maintenance contracts. The CANoe Test Feature Set can also support fault diagnostics and serve as a diagnostic tester. The Advantages Test Execution Time Dramatically Reduced Automating ECU test execution, pass/fail detection and re- port generation helped Nippon Seiki to successfully reduce total ECU test time from more than 18 hours to just over 12 hours. In particular, test execution time, which previously took 11 hours, has now been shortened to about 4 minutes! The more frequently testing is executed, the greater the gains in testing efficiency. Finally, use of the CANoe Test Feature Set has dramatically reduced the man-hours needed to per- form the tests (see table below). A System Design Department Manager described the advan- tages of automatic execution like this: “There is certainly some test case implementation work to be done when auto- mating. But once the test case is created, the ability to reuse it again and again is a huge advantage. In turn, this improves overall testing quality.” In this project, 30% of all ECU test cases are automated using the CANoe Test Feature Set. Nippon Seiki will be expanding its automated testing coverage in the future and targeting even greater efficiency in ECU testing. Case Study Automating ECU Test Execution, Pass/Fail Detection, and Report Generation Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. V1.0 11/2009 VJ_PND_JAP_Nippon Seiki_Automating_ECU_Testing_Execution_EN Your contact at Vector: Katsuhiro Kinoshita [email protected] www.vector-japan.co.jp (*) Test No. 2 is executed simultaneously with Test No. 1. Table: Comparison, in relation to test case and manhours, between conven- tional test method and the use of the CANoe Test Feature Set

Automating ECU Test Execution, Pas Fail Detection, and ...tages of automatic execution like this: “There is certainly some test case implementation work to be done when auto-mating

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Automating ECU Test Execution, Pas Fail Detection, and ...tages of automatic execution like this: “There is certainly some test case implementation work to be done when auto-mating

The CustomerFrom the time it was founded, Nippon Seiki has extended its business, focusing on the development and manufactur-ing in-vehicle instrumentation. Nippon Seiki’s technologi-cal competence in this field is highly rated, and as a leading manufacturer of instrument panels it supplies a large num-ber of automobile and motorcycle manufacturers.

The ChallengeReducing ECU testing man-hours while simultaneously im-proving quality of overall testingWith growing computerization in automobiles, instrument

panels are moving toward multifunctionality. That is why

manual ECU test execution, pass/fail detection, and creating

reports took a huge amount of time. This has resulted in in-

creased ECU testing man-hours, and their reduction has be-

come a major issue.

The SolutionAutomation of ECU Testing using the CANoe Test Feature SetCANoe, provided by Vector, is used by a large number of cus-

tomers who develop in-vehicle ECUs. The CANoe Test Feature

Set is designed to automate ECU stimulation, pass/failure

detection and test report generation. To solve the issue of

increased man-hours, the following proposal was made to

Nippon Seiki:

Test samples: Delivery of a total of five test samples, includ-

ing a CAN Message Synchronization Test, Diagnostic Test,

and Gateway Test.

Training of employees involved in testing.

Technical support: In the context of technical support for

customers with maintenance contracts.

The CANoe Test Feature Set can also support fault diagnostics

and serve as a diagnostic tester.

The AdvantagesTest Execution Time Dramatically ReducedAutomating ECU test execution, pass/fail detection and re-

port generation helped Nippon Seiki to successfully reduce

total ECU test time from more than 18 hours to just over 12

hours. In particular, test execution time, which previously

took 11 hours, has now been shortened to about 4 minutes!

The more frequently testing is executed, the greater the gains

in testing efficiency. Finally, use of the CANoe Test Feature

Set has dramatically reduced the man-hours needed to per-

form the tests (see table below).

A System Design Department Manager described the advan-

tages of automatic execution like this: “There is certainly

some test case implementation work to be done when auto-

mating. But once the test case is created, the ability to reuse

it again and again is a huge advantage. In turn, this improves

overall testing quality.”

In this project, 30% of all ECU test cases are automated using

the CANoe Test Feature Set. Nippon Seiki will be expanding its

automated testing coverage in the future and targeting even

greater efficiency in ECU testing.

Case StudyAutomating ECU Test Execution,

Pass/Fail Detection, and Report Generation

Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd.

V1.0

11/

2009

VJ_

PND_

JAP_

Nip

pon

Seik

i_Au

tom

atin

g_EC

U_T

esti

ng_E

xecu

tion

_EN

Your contact at Vector:Katsuhiro Kinoshita [email protected]

(*) Test No. 2 is executed simultaneously with Test No. 1.

Table: Comparison, in relation to test case and manhours, between conven-tional test method and the use of the CANoe Test Feature Set