39
Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric Jimmie Lawson Work with Yongdo Lim Louisiana State University Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 1/2

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and theThompson metric

Jimmie Lawson

Work with Yongdo Lim

Louisiana State University

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 1/25

Page 2: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Background

Let A be a unital C∗-algebra with identity e, and let A+ be

the set of positive invertible elements of A. It is known thatA

+ is an open convex cone in the space H(A) of hermitianelements. The geometry of A

+ has been studied by severalauthors. One particular focus in this geometry has been thestudy of appropriate non-positive curvature properties.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 2/25

Page 3: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Background

Let A be a unital C∗-algebra with identity e, and let A+ be

the set of positive invertible elements of A. It is known thatA

+ is an open convex cone in the space H(A) of hermitianelements. The geometry of A

+ has been studied by severalauthors. One particular focus in this geometry has been thestudy of appropriate non-positive curvature properties.

One approach has been to endow A+ with a natural Finsler

structure and metric and use this for a substitute for theRiemannian geometry commonly considered infinite-dimensional examples. For example,Andruchow-Corach-Stojanoff and Corach-Porta-Recht haveshown the convexity of the distance function along twodistinct geodesics and its equivalence to the well-knownLoewner-Heinz inequality.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 2/25

Page 4: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Background II

K.-H. Neeb established an appropriate differentialgeometric notion of seminegative (equal non-positive)curvature for certain classes of Finsler manifolds,particularly the infinite-dimensional symmetric spaces,including the case of A

+.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 3/25

Page 5: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Background II

K.-H. Neeb established an appropriate differentialgeometric notion of seminegative (equal non-positive)curvature for certain classes of Finsler manifolds,particularly the infinite-dimensional symmetric spaces,including the case of A

+.

Our approach has been somewhat different from either ofthe preceding. We replace the differential geometricstructure by the structure of a metric symmetric spaceendowed with a midpoint operation and studyseminegativity via the metric. We have obtained theconvexity of the metric for such symmetric spaces withweaker metric assumptions than those enjoyed by theFinsler metric on A

+.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 3/25

Page 6: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Overview

The main goal of this presentation is to present a verygeneral framework, that of a general notion of a symmetriccone, in which one can derive and study variousinequalities, such as those familiar from operator theory.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 4/25

Page 7: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Overview

The main goal of this presentation is to present a verygeneral framework, that of a general notion of a symmetriccone, in which one can derive and study variousinequalities, such as those familiar from operator theory.

Our notion of a symmetric cone is that of an open normalcone in a Banach space equipped with an axiomaticsymmetric structure that is appropriately connected to theconal structure. All of this of course, needs to be madeprecise.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 4/25

Page 8: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Proper and Normal Cones

Let V be a Banach space and let Ω henceforth denote anon-empty proper open convex cone of V : tΩ ⊂ Ω for allt > 0, Ω + Ω ⊂ Ω, and Ω ∩ −Ω = 0, where Ω denotes theclosure of Ω.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 5/25

Page 9: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Proper and Normal Cones

Let V be a Banach space and let Ω henceforth denote anon-empty proper open convex cone of V : tΩ ⊂ Ω for allt > 0, Ω + Ω ⊂ Ω, and Ω ∩ −Ω = 0, where Ω denotes theclosure of Ω.

We further assume that Ω is a normal cone: there exists aconstant K with ||x|| ≤ K||y|| for all x, y ∈ Ω with x ≤ y.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 5/25

Page 10: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

The Order

For a normal cone Ω, the relation

x ≤ y if and only if y − x ∈ Ω

is a partial order. We write x < y if y − x ∈ Ω.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 6/25

Page 11: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

The Order

For a normal cone Ω, the relation

x ≤ y if and only if y − x ∈ Ω

is a partial order. We write x < y if y − x ∈ Ω.

Any member ε of Ω is an order unit for the ordered space(V,≤), and the cone is normal if and only if the order unitnorm determined by ε

‖x‖ε = infM > 0 : −Mε ≤ x ≤ Mε

is compatible, i.e., determines the topology of V . In thiscase 0 ≤ x ≤ y implies ‖x‖ε ≤ ‖y‖ε, that is, we may (and do)assume without loss of generality that K = 1.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 6/25

Page 12: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

The Thompson Metric

A. C. Thompson has shown that Ω is a complete metricspace with respect to the Thompson (part) metric

d(x, y) = maxlog M(x/y), log M(y/x),

where M(x/y) := infλ > 0 : x ≤ λy.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 7/25

Page 13: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

The Thompson Metric

A. C. Thompson has shown that Ω is a complete metricspace with respect to the Thompson (part) metric

d(x, y) = maxlog M(x/y), log M(y/x),

where M(x/y) := infλ > 0 : x ≤ λy.The Thompson metric can be alternatively realized as anappropriately defined Finsler length metric (Nussbaum): forx ∈ Ω and v ∈ V = TxΩ, |v|x(= inft > 0 : −tx ≤ v ≤ tx).The Thompson part metric d(x, y) agrees with the Finslerdistance from x to y:

d(x, y) = inf∫ 1

0|γ′(t)|γ(t) : γ ∈ S, γ(0) = x, γ(1) = y,

where S =the set of piecewise C1-maps γ : [0, 1] → Ω.Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 7/25

Page 14: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Strict Symmetric Sets

A strict symmetric set is a triple (X, •,#) with left translationSxy := x • y representing the point symmetry through x,satisfying for all a, b, c ∈ X:

(S1) a • a = a (Saa = a);

(S2) a • (a • b) = b (SaSa = idX);

(S3) a • (b • c) = (a • b) • (a • c) (SaSb = SSabSa);

(S4) (strictness) the equation x • a = b (Sxa = b) has aunique solution x = a#b called the midpoint ofsymmetry or mean of a and b.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 8/25

Page 15: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Strict Symmetric Sets

A strict symmetric set is a triple (X, •,#) with left translationSxy := x • y representing the point symmetry through x,satisfying for all a, b, c ∈ X:

(S1) a • a = a (Saa = a);

(S2) a • (a • b) = b (SaSa = idX);

(S3) a • (b • c) = (a • b) • (a • c) (SaSb = SSabSa);

(S4) (strictness) the equation x • a = b (Sxa = b) has aunique solution x = a#b called the midpoint ofsymmetry or mean of a and b.

The binary operations • and # uniquely determine eachother via

c = a#b ⇔ c • a = b.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 8/25

Page 16: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

The Loos Axioms

The Loos axioms for a symmetric space posit a topological(smooth) space X equipped with a continuous (smooth)binary operation • satisfying (S1)-(S3) and(S4’) For each x ∈ X, the fixed points of Sx are isolated.

Our variant (S4) implies (S4’) since under (S4) the onlyfixed point of Sx is x itself. Thus the axioms for a strictsymmetric space have a purely algebraic formulation.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 9/25

Page 17: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Twisted Subgroups

A twisted subgroup P of a group G is a subset containingthe identity e, closed under inversion, and under(a, b) 7→ aba. With respect to a • b := ab−1a (sometimescalled the “core" operation), P satisfies (S1), (S2), and (S3).

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 10/25

Page 18: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Twisted Subgroups

A twisted subgroup P of a group G is a subset containingthe identity e, closed under inversion, and under(a, b) 7→ aba. With respect to a • b := ab−1a (sometimescalled the “core" operation), P satisfies (S1), (S2), and (S3).

The twisted subgroup P is a strict symmetric set if and onlyif it is uniquely 2-divisible (every element of P has a uniquesquare root in P ). In this casea#b = a1/2(a−1/2ba−1/2)1/2a1/2.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 10/25

Page 19: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Twisted Subgroups

A twisted subgroup P of a group G is a subset containingthe identity e, closed under inversion, and under(a, b) 7→ aba. With respect to a • b := ab−1a (sometimescalled the “core" operation), P satisfies (S1), (S2), and (S3).

The twisted subgroup P is a strict symmetric set if and onlyif it is uniquely 2-divisible (every element of P has a uniquesquare root in P ). In this casea#b = a1/2(a−1/2ba−1/2)1/2a1/2.

Example. For a C∗-algebra A, the positive partA

+ = xx∗ : x ∈ A ∩ G(A) is such a twisted subgroup ofthe group G(A) of invertible elements.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 10/25

Page 20: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

A Converse

Let ε be a distinguished point of a strict symmetric set(P, •,#). For x ∈ P , define the displacement Q(x) : P → Pby Q(x) = SxSε. The displacements are isomorphisms of Pand generate the displacement group G(P ).

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 11/25

Page 21: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

A Converse

Let ε be a distinguished point of a strict symmetric set(P, •,#). For x ∈ P , define the displacement Q(x) : P → Pby Q(x) = SxSε. The displacements are isomorphisms of Pand generate the displacement group G(P ).

The map x 7→ Q(x) from P to G(P ), called the quadraticrepresentation, carries P to Q(P ), a uniquely 2-divisibletwisted subgroup of G(P ), and is an isomorphism onto Q(P )endowed with the core operation and corresponding meanoperation.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 11/25

Page 22: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Weighted Means

The core of the group (R,+) has operations

λ • µ = λ − µ + λ = 2λ − µ; λ#µ =λ + µ

2,

and these operations restrict to a strict symmetric structureon the dyadic rationals D.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 12/25

Page 23: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Weighted Means

The core of the group (R,+) has operations

λ • µ = λ − µ + λ = 2λ − µ; λ#µ =λ + µ

2,

and these operations restrict to a strict symmetric structureon the dyadic rationals D.

Given x 6= y in a strict symmetric set P , there exists aunique morphism of (D, •,#) to P taking 0 to x and 1 to y.We denote the image of t ∈ D by x#ty, called thet-weighted mean of x and y. Note x#1/2y = x#y.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 12/25

Page 24: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Powers

Dyadic powers for (P, •,#, ε) arise as a special case ofweighted means: xt = ε#tx for x ∈ P , t ∈ D.In the case of a uniquely 2-divisible twisted subgroupequipped with the core operation and with ε the identity, thisnotion agrees with powers in the group. Thus powers maybe alternatively defined through the quadraticrepresentation.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 13/25

Page 25: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Powers

Dyadic powers for (P, •,#, ε) arise as a special case ofweighted means: xt = ε#tx for x ∈ P , t ∈ D.In the case of a uniquely 2-divisible twisted subgroupequipped with the core operation and with ε the identity, thisnotion agrees with powers in the group. Thus powers maybe alternatively defined through the quadraticrepresentation.

For s, t ∈ D, x ∈ P , exponents satisfy the laws

xst = xst, xs • xt = x2s−t, xs#xt = x(s+t)/2.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 13/25

Page 26: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Symmetric Spaces

A pointed strict symmetric space with convex metric is apointed strict symmetric set P equipped with a completemetric d(·, ·) satisfying for all x, y ∈ P and g ∈ G(P )

(i) d(g.x, g.y) = d(x, y),

(ii) d(x−1, y−1) = d(x, y),

(iii) d(ε, x1/2) = (1/2)d(ε, x),

(iv) d(x1/2, y1/2) ≤ 12d(x, y) (Busemann nonpositive

curvature),

(v) x 7→ x2 : P → P is continuous.

A strict symmetric space with convex metric is a strictsymmetric set equipped with a complete metric that is apointed strict symmetric space with convex metric withrespect to some pointing.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 14/25

Page 27: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Symmetric Space Properties

Let (P, •,#) be a pointed strict symmetric space withconvex metric.

1. For x 6= y, ∃! αx,y : (R, •,#) → (P, •,#) a continuoushomomorphism that is also a metric geodesic such thatαx,y(0) = x and αx,y(1) = y.

2. For every pair (β, γ) of such geodesics, the real function

t 7→ d(β(t), γ(t))

is a convex function (Busemann NPC II).

3. The maps (x, y) 7→ x • y : P × P → P and(t, x, y) 7→ αx,y(t) := x#ty : R × P × P → P arecontinuous. The element x#ty is called the t-weightedmean of x and y. Note that x#y = x#1/2y.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 15/25

Page 28: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Cones With Symmetric Structures

Key Lemma. Let Ω be an open normal cone in a Banachspace V. Suppose in addition that (Ω, •,#, ε) is a pointedstrict symmetric set such that the displacementsQ(x) : Ω → Ω are positively homogeneous for all x ∈ Ω.Then (λx)−1 = 1

λx−1 and λtε = (λε)t for all λ > 0 and alldyadic rationals t. Moreover µx#tλx = µ1−tλtx for all x ∈ Ω,µ, λ > 0 and all dyadic rationals t. Furthermore, thefollowing conditions are equivalent:

(i) (λx)1/2 =√

λx1/2 for all x ∈ Ω and λ > 0;

(ii) (λx)t = λtxt for any dyadic rational t and x ∈ Ω andλ > 0;

(iii) Q(λx) = λ2Q(x) for any x ∈ Ω and λ > 0.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 16/25

Page 29: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Key Theorem I

Theorem. Let Ω be an open normal cone in a Banachspace V. Suppose that there is a pointed strict symmetricstructure on Ω satisfying

(i) ε#x = x1/2 ≤ (ε + x)/2.

(ii) the squaring map x 7→ x2 = Q(x)ε is continuous (in therelative norm topology of Ω).

(iii) every basic displacement Q(x) is continuous and linear(that is, additive and positively homogeneous) on Ω.

Then Ω is a strict symmetric space with convex metric withrespect to the Thompson metric that satisfies the equivalentconditions (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Key Lemma.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 17/25

Page 30: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Key Theorem II

Furthermore, (i) the order-reversing property of inversion,(ii) the harmonic-geometric-arithmetic mean inequality, and(iii) the Loewner-Heinz inequality all hold: for a, b ∈ Ω,

(i) b−1 ≤ a−1 if a ≤ b,

(ii) 2(a−1 + b−1)−1 ≤ a#b ≤ 12(a + b), and

(iii) at ≤ bt if a ≤ b, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 18/25

Page 31: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Key Theorem II

Furthermore, (i) the order-reversing property of inversion,(ii) the harmonic-geometric-arithmetic mean inequality, and(iii) the Loewner-Heinz inequality all hold: for a, b ∈ Ω,

(i) b−1 ≤ a−1 if a ≤ b,

(ii) 2(a−1 + b−1)−1 ≤ a#b ≤ 12(a + b), and

(iii) at ≤ bt if a ≤ b, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.

Cones satisfying the hypotheses (and hence conclusions)of the preceding theorem will be called Loos symmetriccones.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 18/25

Page 32: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Nonpositive Curvature

It is interesting to note that in the context of cones equippedwith symmetric structures the weakened form of thegeometric-arithmetic mean inequality

ε#x = x1/2 ≤ (ε + x)/2

yields both the Loewner-Heinz inequality and Busemannnonnegative curvature (in the sense that the Thompsonmetric is convex).

Question: Is convexity of the Thompson metric equivalentto convexity of the Hilbert metric?

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 19/25

Page 33: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Example: C∗-Algebras

If A is a unital C∗-algebra with identity e, then the cone A+

of positive invertible elements is an open normal convexcone in the closed subspace H(A) of hermitian elements.The set A

+ is a twisted subgroup (closed under(x, y) 7→ xy−1x) with unique square roots of themultiplicative group of invertible elements of A, hence apointed strict symmetric set with respect to x • y = xy−1xand distinguished point the identity e. Furthermore, thepowers computed in the algebra agree with those computedin (A+, •, e), so that the squaring map is continuous. Thecondition x1/2 ≤ (e + x)/2 is equivalent to (e − x)2 ≥ 0, thusvalid. Since Q(x)y = x(y−1)−1x = xyx, the mapping Q(x) isa continuous and linear on H(A).

It follows that the cone A+ is a Loos symmetric cone.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 20/25

Page 34: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Harmonic-Arithmetic Approximation

Many results concerning the cone of positive elements inan algebra generalize to Loos symmetric cones.

For x, y in a Loos symmetric cone Ω in a Banach space V ,define H1 = H(x, y), the harmonic mean, and A1 = A(x, y),the arithmetic mean. Inductively define Hn+1 = H(Hn, An)and An+1 = A(Hn, An). Then for each n,

Hn ≤ Hn+1 ≤ x#y ≤ An+1 ≤ An,

and Hn → x#y, An → x#y.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 21/25

Page 35: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Inequalities

Numerous operator inequalities remain valid in the moregeneral context of Loos symmetric cones, for example,

The Furuta Inequality: Let Ω be a Loos symmetric cone ina Banach space V and let 0 < b ≤ a. If 0 ≤ p, q, r ∈ R

satisfies p + 2r ≤ (1 + 2r)q and 1 ≤ q, then

bp+2r

q ≤ (br.ap)1

q .

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 22/25

Page 36: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

JB-Algebras

A Jordan algebra is a vector space Z with a commutativemultiplication xy such that x(x2y) = x2(xy) holds for x, y ∈ Z.A JB-algebra V is a real Jordan algebra with unit eendowed with a complete norm || · || such that

||zw|| ≤ ||z|| ||w||, ||z2|| = ||z||2, ||z||2 ≤ ||z2 + w2||.

(The hermitian elements x = x∗ of any C∗-algebra form aJB-algebra with respect to the symmetric productx y := (xy + yx)/2. )

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 23/25

Page 37: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

JB-Algebras

A Jordan algebra is a vector space Z with a commutativemultiplication xy such that x(x2y) = x2(xy) holds for x, y ∈ Z.A JB-algebra V is a real Jordan algebra with unit eendowed with a complete norm || · || such that

||zw|| ≤ ||z|| ||w||, ||z2|| = ||z||2, ||z||2 ≤ ||z2 + w2||.

(The hermitian elements x = x∗ of any C∗-algebra form aJB-algebra with respect to the symmetric productx y := (xy + yx)/2. )

Theorem. Let V be a JB-algebra and let Ω = exp V be theassociated positive cone. Then Ω is a Loos symmetric cone.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 23/25

Page 38: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Hermitian Banach Algebras

Let Z be a unital Banach algebra Z with a continuousinvolution ∗ and let X consist of the self-adjoint elements ofZ. Let e denote the unit element of Z. The unital Banachalgebra Z is called hermitian if σ(x) ⊂ R and||x|| = sup |σ(x)| for every x = x∗. We let

Ω := x = x∗ : σ(x) ⊂ (0,∞).

Theorem. Let Z be a hermitian Banach algebra. Then Ω isa Loos symmetric cone of X.

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 24/25

Page 39: Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metricconstantin.vernicos.org/Articles/Hilbgeom.pdfThe Order For a normal cone Ω, the relation x ≤ y if and only if y −x ∈ Ω is a

Open Problem

The least squares mean A of positive matrices A1, . . . , An

minimizes

F (X) =n∑

i=1

d2(X,Ai),

where d is the trace Riemannian metric.

Problem. Does the least squares mean generalize to Loossymmetric cones?

Axiomatic Symmetric Cones and the Thompson metric – p. 25/25