Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | www.smeinc.com
September 16, 2021
City of Charleston: Department of Parks
823 Meeting Street
Charleston, South Carolina 29403
Attention: Mr. Neil O’Hara
Reference: Asbestos Assessment Update Letter
City of Charleston Fire Station #16
81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 218418
Dear Mr. O’Hara:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide this letter summarizing the asbestos assessment update of the
referenced structure, conducted on September 15, 2021. Our services were performed in general accordance with
S&ME Proposal No. 218418, dated September 13, 2021. The following sections include the project background,
findings, and conclusions and recommendations.
Background
On September 8, 2021, in an email to Mr. McMillan, you requested a proposal for an asbestos assessment update
to support the planned renovations at Fire Station 16 located at 81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road in Charleston,
South Carolina. S&ME previously prepared an Asbestos and Lead-based Assessment Report, dated August 8, 2017
(attached) for the referenced structure. Based on information you provided, it is our understanding no additional
building materials have been installed since the referenced 2017 assessment. The purpose of the assessment
update was to verify the findings of the referenced 2017 assessment report regarding asbestos containing
materials (ACMs) and provide recommendations to properly treat ACMs to prevent worker exposures, emissions,
and properly dispose of the subject materials.
Findings
The referenced 2017 report was reviewed and the condition of previously identified ACMs was reassessed.
The following ACM summarized in the following table (Table 1) was confirmed present at the subject site.
Limited Asbestos Assessment Update Report
City of Charleston – Fire Station 16
81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 218418
September 16, 2021 2
Table 1: Summary of ACMs
Material HA Location Asbestos
Type Percent Condition
Potential for
Disturbance
*Approx.
Quantity
Coating (black) associated
with the underside of a Sink SC Kitchen Sink Chrysotile 2 G, NF PD 5 SF
*The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.
Abbreviations:
HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear foot G = good
D = damaged SD = significantly damaged NF = non-friable F = friable
LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for sig. disturbance
The identified asbestos containing coating is classified as a Category I non-friable ACM, in good condition, with a
potential for disturbance due to the planned renovations.
The inspector’s SCDHEC license is provided in Attachment I and a copy of the referenced 2017 report is provided
in Attachment II.
Limitations
This report is provided for the sole use of the City of Charleston. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such
party's sole risk and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this
report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling and of the specific area referenced.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The asbestos assessment update conducted on September 15, 2021 of Fire Station 16 located at 81 Ashley Hall
Plantation Road in Charleston, South Carolina confirmed the presence of a Category I non-friable ACM, in good
condition.
We recommend proper removal and disposal of the identified ACM by a SCDHEC licensed contractor, prior to any
activities that may disturb the material. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) working in the subject
areas to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations. If additional suspect ACMs are
discovered that are not addressed in this report or the referenced 2017 report, bulk samples must be collected by
a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content, prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect
materials.
Limited Asbestos Assessment Update Report
City of Charleston – Fire Station 16
81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 218418
September 16, 2021 3
Closing
S&ME appreciates the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services and we look forward to our
continued association. If you have any questions concerning the report, please contact us at (843) 884-0005.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
James L. McMillan Terry W. Richburg
Project Industrial Hygienist Environmental Group Leader
Attachments
South Carolina
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Asbestos License
Joshua B. Veloso
Air Sampler AS-000640
Building Inspector BI-001989
S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com
Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
81 Ashley Hall Planation Road
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
Assessment Performed by and Report Prepared by:
__________________________________________________________ 8-9-17_______
William R. Seaborn (SCDHEC Accreditation# MP-01317) Date
Prepared for:
City of Charleston, Department of Parks
823 Meeting Street
Charleston, SC 29403
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
620 Wando Park Boulevard
Mt Pleasant, SC 29464
August 8, 2017
S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | f 843.881.6149 | www.smeinc.com
August 8, 2017
City of Charleston, Department of Parks
823 Meeting Street
Charleston, South Carolina 29403
Attention: Leon Patat
Reference: Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston - Fire Station 16
81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
Dear Mr. Patat:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide the enclosed report detailing the asbestos and lead-based paint
assessment of Fire Station 16 located at 81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road in Charleston, SC. The assessment
was performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal 42-1700901 dated July 21, 2017. The enclosed
report includes the executive summary, project background, assessment procedures, findings and results,
and conclusions and recommendations for the proper treatment of asbestos containing materials and
lead-based paint.
This report is provided for the sole use of the City of Charleston. Use of this report by any other parties
will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third
parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the
assessment and of the specific areas referenced. The information provided in this assessment report
should not be used as a bidding document, and field conditions should be verified.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services. If you have any
questions concerning this report, please call us at (843) 884-0005.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Terry W. Richburg James L. Killingsworth, CHMM
Environmental Group Leader Environmental Services Area Manager, V.P.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 ii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1
1.0 Background ............................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Asbestos Assessment ................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Lead-based Paint Assessment .................................................................................................. 3
2.0 Asbestos Assessment ............................................................................................ 3
2.1 Assessment Procedures ............................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Findings and Results ................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key .......................................................................... 6
3.0 Lead-Based Paint Assessment ............................................................................. 6
3.1 Procedures ................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Findings ....................................................................................................................................... 7
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................. 7
4.1 Asbestos Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations ...................................................................................... 7
Appendices
Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results ................................................................................................... i
Appendix II – Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations ........................................................................................ ii
Appendix III – Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License................................................................................ iii
Appendix IV – Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Records .......................................... iv
Appendix V – Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings .......................................................................... v
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 1
Executive Summary
An asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on July 28, 2017, of the interior and exterior
of the City of Charleston Fire Station 16 located at 81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road in Charleston, South
Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials
(ACMs) and lead-based paint to support renovation activities. The assessment also complies with federal,
state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of asbestos containing building materials
that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.
Fire Station 16 is one story, with an attic area, and is comprised of two truck bays with additional storage
and laundry rooms to the Northeast. The Southwest side of the structure contains a living area, office,
kitchen area, two sleeping areas and three restrooms. The exterior of the structure is finished with vinyl
siding, and a pitched metal roof. Interior finishes include drywall walls and ceilings, spray-applied ceiling
texturing, and acoustical ceiling tiles. Flooring in the structure consists of bare concrete floors as well as
vinyl floor coverings. The structure was occupied on the day of our visit.
Asbestos
The suspect ACMs sampled from the subject areas as part of this assessment included drywall and
associated joint compound, vinyl floor tile and associated mastic, duct insulation and associated mastic,
mastic associated with the underside of a sink, piping insulation, spray-applied ceiling texture, and mastic
associated with rubber cove base.
Based on the bulk samples collected and analyzed as part of this assessment, the following ACMs were
identified:
Material HA Location Asbestos
Type Percent Condition
Potential for
Disturbance
*Approx.
Quantity
Fire Station 16
Coating associated with
the underside of a Sink SC Kitchen Chrysotile 2 G, NF LPD 5 SF
*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.
Abbreviations:
HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear feet
G = good D = damaged NF = non-friable F = friable
LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for significant disturbance
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 2
The assessment of the Fire Station identified asbestos containing mastic coating associated with the
underside of a sink, which is classified as a Category I Non-friable ACM. The ACM was in good condition,
with a limited potential for disturbance due to the planned renovation activities. The remaining bulk
samples collected from the structure did not exhibit the presence of >1% asbestos.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) defines a material an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a
representative sample.
We recommend proper removal and disposal of the identified ACMs, by a SCDHEC licensed asbestos
abatement contractor, prior to any destructive activities that may disturb the ACMs, as required by the
SCDHEC and EPA. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during the
planned renovation/demolition activities, bulk samples must be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector
and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials. This report
should also be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal
regulations.
Lead-based Paint Assessment
A lead-based paint assessment was performed on July 28, 2017, concurrently with the asbestos
assessment, of representative painted components associated with the interior and exterior of the former
residential structure. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
technology using a Thermo Scientific XLp 302 (serial #25910). For the purpose of this assessment, painted
surfaces with lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit (0.7 mg/cm2) are considered lead-
based paint.
Based on the assessment and testing performed on the painted components associated with the exterior
and interior of the structure, no lead levels meeting the SCDHEC disposal level (0.7 mg/cm2) were
identified. However, low levels of lead were present which may be applicable to the standards of
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) depending
upon the tasks impacting those painted surfaces.
Destructive actions to paint containing low levels of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding,
grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the
OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial
exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 3
1.0 Background
On July 19, 2017, you contacted Jim Killingsworth (S&ME) via email and requested an asbestos and lead-
based paint assessment of the structure located at 81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road in Charleston, South
Carolina. The structure is one story and is approximately 3,200 square feet. The purpose of the
assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paints
to comply with state and federal regulations prior to the renovation or demolition of a structure.
Fire Station 16 is one story, with an attic area, and is comprised of two truck bays with additional storage
and laundry rooms to the Northeast. The Southwest side of the structure contains a living area, office,
kitchen area, two sleeping areas and three restrooms. The exterior of the structure is finished with vinyl
siding, as well as a pitched metal roof. Interior finishes include drywall walls and ceilings, spray-applied
ceiling texturing, and acoustical ceiling tiles. Flooring in the structure consisted of bare concrete floors as
well as vinyl floor coverings. The structure was occupied on the day of our visit.
1.1 Asbestos Assessment
The asbestos assessment was conducted to assess, sample, and identify ACMs in accordance with
regulatory requirements. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures
and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40
Code of the Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the South Carolina
Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), along with Title 29 Code of Federal
Regulations, part 1926 enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The
following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and
analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations related to ACMs.
1.2 Lead-based Paint Assessment
The purpose of the testing was to assess and identify lead-based paint coatings associated with the
interior of the referenced structure. The identification of these materials will aid in the compliance of
occupational exposure (OSHA) and/or environmental releases of airborne lead dust in accordance with
OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) and provide information to determine proper disposal of
lead-based paint coated components and debris in accordance with the SCDHEC and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).
2.0 Asbestos Assessment
2.1 Assessment Procedures
The assessment was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs associated with the subject
structure. Significant destructive testing was not performed, therefore the possibility exists that suspect
materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as inside pipe chases, wall voids, or flooring overlays.
If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must
be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 4
A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC
and EPA. Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk
samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and
submitted to our in-house Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) laboratory. The samples were subsequently
analyzed by PLM, and confirmation analysis was performed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) by
EMSL Analytical, for representative non-friable organically bound materials reported negative by PLM.
The laboratories are located in Charlotte, North Carolina and are accredited by the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology.
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with
dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I
(1-1-87 edition), Part 763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based
on six optical characteristics: morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of
elongation and dispersion staining colors. The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos
identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Suspect non-friable organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were
analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with SCDHEC requirements.
2.2 Findings and Results
The suspect ACMs sampled from the subject areas as part of this assessment included drywall and
associated joint compound, vinyl floor tile and associated mastic, duct insulation and associated mastic,
mastic associated with the underside of a sink, piping insulation, spray-applied ceiling texture, and mastic
associated with rubber cove base.
Based on the bulk samples collected and analyzed as part of this assessment, the following ACMs were
identified:
Material HA Location Asbestos
Type Percent Condition
Potential for
Disturbance
*Approx.
Quantity
Fire Station 16
Coating associated with
the underside of a Sink SC Kitchen Chrysotile 2 G, NF LPD 5 SF
*Note: The quantities are estimated and should be field verified for bidding purposes.
Abbreviations:
HA = homogeneous area SF = square feet LF = linear feet
G = good D = damaged NF = non-friable F = friable
LPD = low potential for disturbance PD = potential for disturbance PSD = potential for significant disturbance
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 5
The EPA classifies ACMs into two categories; friable and non-friable. A friable material creates a greater
health hazard due to the fact that it may be "crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by the forces
expected to act upon it in the course of demolition or renovation operations
The assessment of the Fire Station identified asbestos containing mastic coating associated with the
underside of a sink, which is classified as a Category I Non-friable ACM. The ACM was in good condition,
with a low potential for disturbance due to the planned demolition activities. The remaining bulk samples
collected from the structure did not exhibit the presence of >1% asbestos.
The EPA and the OSHA defines a material an ACM if an asbestos content of greater than one percent
(>1%) is detected in a representative sample.
A summary of asbestos results is provided in Appendix I, and exhibits the sample number, location, type
of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and
corresponding result for each sample. A diagram of bulk sample locations is provided in Attachment II,
and a copy of the inspector’s SCDHEC license is provided in Attachment III. Copies of the laboratory
analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Attachment IV.
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 6
2.3 Abbreviations and Hazard Assessment Key
In accordance with the EPA and SCDHEC, confirmed ACMs are assigned a hazard assessment based on its
present condition and potential for disturbance. The hazard assessment is used as a tool for prioritization
in remedial actions regarding ACM(s) as noted in Appendix I, Table 3.
Present Condition
F = Friable
NF = Non-friable
G = Good (Very localized limited damage)
D = Damaged (Damage of less than 10% distributed and less than 25% localized)
SD = Significantly Damaged (Damage equal to or greater than 10% distributed, 25% localized)
Potential for Future Disturbance
LPD = Low Potential for Disturbance (Contact, Vibration, and Air Erosion all of Low Concern)
PD = Potential for Damage (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of Moderate Concern)
PSD = Potential for Significant Damage (Contact, Vibration, or Air Erosion of High Concern)
Hazard Assessment
3.0 Lead-Based Paint Assessment
3.1 Procedures
A lead-based paint assessment and testing was performed on representative painted components
associated with the interior and exterior of the subject areas. The components were analyzed with a
Thermo Scientific XLp-302 XRF spectrum analyzer (serial #25910). The suspect painted finishes were
selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which
it was applied. The possibility exists that lead-based paint finishes are present in those inaccessible areas
such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc. The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead
at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment,
paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned activities.
Significantly
Damaged
(SD)
Damaged
(D)
Good
(G)
PSD PD LPD PSD PD LPD
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 7
The OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne
concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action
level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit
of 50 µg/m3.
3.2 Findings
Based on the assessment and testing performed on July 28, 2017, of the painted components associated
with the exterior of the referenced structures, no lead levels meeting the SCDHEC disposal level (0.7
mg/cm2) were identified. However, low levels of lead were present in various paints and may be
applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the
planned treatments of those painted surfaces.
The summary of XRF readings is provided in Appendix V, and should be reviewed in full.
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
An asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on July 28, 2017 of the structure located at
81 Ashley Hall Plantation Road in Charleston, South Carolina and a Category I non-friable ACM was
identified. Lead-based paint, applicable to the SCDHEC disposal standards, was not identified. However,
low levels of lead applicable to the standards of the OSHA were identified.
This report should be provided to contractor(s) involved in any renovation/demolition activities to assist
with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.
4.1 Asbestos Recommendations
Due to the planned renovation activities that may disturb the identified ACM, we recommend proper
removal and disposal of the ACM by a SCDHEC licensed asbestos abatement contractor, prior to
destructive activities to the ACM.
If additional suspect ACMs that are not addressed in this report are discovered during the planned
renovation activities, bulk samples must be collected by a South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SCDHEC) licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to
disturbance or disposal of the suspect material(s). This report should also be provided to the contractor(s)
to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.
4.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations
Destructive actions (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation,
etc.) to paint containing low levels of lead will require the contractor comply with the standards of the
OSHA regulation 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial
exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.
Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray
fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF
may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example
Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Assessment Report
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
August 8, 2017 8
disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess
of the OSHA Action Level.
Summary of Asbestos Results
City of Charleston - Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
Date of Sampling: July 28, 2017
Sample No. Location Material2Approx.
Quantity
Asbestos
Type1Percent Condition
Potential for
Disturbance
Hazard
Assessment
197-DW-01 Laundry Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-DW-02 Captain's Bedroom ND NA NA NA NA
197-DW-03 Large Bedroom ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-01 Laundry Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-02 Living Area ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-03 Large Bedroom ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-04 Locker Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-05 Bathroom 2 ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-06 Bathroom 2 ND NA NA NA NA
197-JC-07 Bathroom 1 ND NA NA NA NA
197-PI-01 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-PI-02 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-PI-03 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-PI2-01 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-PI2-02 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-PI2-03 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-SP-01 Storage Room ND NA NA NA NA
197-SP-02 Large Bedroom ND NA NA NA NA
197-SP-03 Living Area ND NA NA NA NA
197-SP-04 Office ND NA NA NA NA
197-SP-05 Living Area ND NA NA NA NA
197-SC-01 Kitchen Chrysotile 2 G, NF LPD 1
197-SC-02 Kitchen Chrysotile 2 G, NF LPD 1
3197-SC-03 Kitchen ND NA NA NA NA
Table II: Summary of Asbestos Results
Drywall
Joint Compound
6,500 SF
Coating associated with the
underside of a Sink (black)
6 LF
6 LF
1,100 SF
5 SF
Pipe Insulation (white)
Pipe Insulation (blue)
Spray-Applied Ceiling Texture
1 of 2
Summary of Asbestos Results
City of Charleston - Fire Station 16
Charleston, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-197
Date of Sampling: July 28, 2017
Sample No. Location Material2Approx.
Quantity
Asbestos
Type1Percent Condition
Potential for
Disturbance
Hazard
Assessment
Table II: Summary of Asbestos Results
197-DM-01 AtticND
NDNA NA NA NA
197-DM-02 AtticND
NDNA NA NA NA
3197-DM-03 Attic
ND
NDNA NA NA NA
197-CB-01 Captain's BathroomND
NDNA NA NA NA
197-CB-02 Bathroom 2ND
NDNA NA NA NA
3197-CB-03 Bathroom 1
ND
NDNA NA NA NA
197-FT-01 KitchenND
NDNA NA NA NA
197-FT-02 Captain's BathroomND
NDNA NA NA NA
3197-FT-03 Bathroom 1
ND
NDNA NA NA NA
ND = No Asbestos Detected LPD = low potential for disturbance F= friable
NA = Not Applicable PD = potential for disturbance
SF = square feet PSD = potential for significant disturbance EA = each
LF = linear feet
1EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.
2Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.
3Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis.
G = good
D = damaged NF = non-friable
SD = significantly damaged
Mastic associated with Rubber
Cove Base (beige)
Vinyl Floor Tile (12" beige) and
associated Mastic (brown)
735 SF
110 LF
1,925 SF
Mastic associated with Duct Work
(white)
2 of 2
LEGEND
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
NOTE: NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC DISPOSAL
LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.
197-PI-01
197-PI-02
197-PI-03
197-PI2-01
197-PI2-02
197-PI2-03
197-SP-01
197-JC-01
197-DW-01
197-DW-03
197-SP-02
197-JC-03
197-FT-01
197-JC-07
197-FT-03
197-CB-03
197-JC-06
197-CB-02
197-JC-04
197-JC-05
197-CB-01
197-DW-02
197-SP-04
197-FT-02
197-SP-03197-SP-05
197-JC-02
197-XX-XX
197-SC-01
197-SC-02
197-SC-03
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL
COATING (BLACK) ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNDERSIDE OF A SINK
-APPROXIMATELY 5 SQUARE FEET
SCALE:
PROJECT NO.
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
APPROVED BY:
FIGURE NO.
Q:\d
raw
in
gs\4213\2017\197 FS 16\4213-17-197.d
wg
ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT ASSESSMENT
CITY OF CHARLESTON FIRE STATION # 16
81 ASHLEY HALL PLANTATION
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
NTS LAJ
4213-17-197 8-07-20171
S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com
South Carolina
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Asbestos License
William Seaborn
Air Sampler AS-00416Building Inspector BI-01317
Charleston Branch 620 Wando Park Blvd.
Mt. Pleasant SC 29464
Asbestos Analysis Summary
Client Job
Client Name
Date Analyzed
Date Received
8/3/2017
7/31/2017
City of Charleston Fire Station 16
9771D Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929
NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPYPerformed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-197
AsbestosComments %/Type %/Type
2 CELLULOSE 98 GYPSUM17-6957 197-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
5 CELLULOSE 95 GYPSUM17-6958 197-DW-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
2 CELLULOSE 98 GYPSUM17-6959 197-DW-03 BEIGE FIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6960 197-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
Page 1 of 6
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report
may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there
have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include
floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these
materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane WasilewskiLaboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-197
AsbestosComments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-6961 197-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6962 197-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6963 197-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6964 197-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6965 197-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6966 197-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
Page 2 of 6
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report
may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there
have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include
floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these
materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane WasilewskiLaboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-197
AsbestosComments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-6967 197-CB-01 YELLOW NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-6968 197-CB-02 YELLOW NONFIBROUS ND
2 CELLULOSE 98 OTHER17-6970 197-DM-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
2 CELLULOSE 98 OTHER17-6971 197-DM-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-6973A 197-FT1-01 BEIGE NONFIBROUS NDTILE
100 OTHER17-6973B 197-FT1-01 YELLOW NONFIBROUS NDMASTIC
Page 3 of 6
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report
may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there
have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include
floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these
materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane WasilewskiLaboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-197
AsbestosComments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-6974A 197-FT1-02 BEIGE NONFIBROUS NDTILE
100 OTHER17-6974B 197-FT1-02 YELLOW NONFIBROUS NDMASTIC
5 CELLULOSE 95 OTHER17-6976A 197-PI1-01 GREY NONFIBROUS NDWRAP
5 CELLULOSE
3 SYNTHETIC
2 GLASS
90 OTHER17-6976B 197-PI1-01 BEIGE FIBROUS NDINSULATION
5 CELLULOSE 95 OTHER17-6977A 197-PI1-02 GREY FIBROUS NDWRAP
5 CELLULOSE
3 SYNTHETIC
2 GLASS
90 OTHER17-6977B 197-PI1-02 BEIGE FIBROUS NDINSULATION
Page 4 of 6
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report
may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there
have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include
floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these
materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane WasilewskiLaboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-197
AsbestosComments %/Type %/Type
5 CELLULOSE 95 OTHER17-6978A 197-PI1-03 GREY FIBROUS NDWRAP
5 CELLULOSE
3 SYNTHETIC
2 GLASS
90 OTHER17-6978B 197-PI1-03 BEIGE FIBROUS NDINSULATION
1 SYNTHETIC 99 PERLITE17-6979 197-PI2-01 BLUE FIBROUS ND
<1 SYNTHETIC 100 PERLITE17-6980 197-PI2-02 BLUE FIBROUS ND
<1 SYNTHETIC 100 PERLITE17-6981 197-PI2-03 BLUE FIBROUS ND
98 OTHER17-6982 197-SC-01 BLACK NONFIBROUS 2 CHRYSOTILE
Page 5 of 6
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report
may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there
have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include
floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these
materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane WasilewskiLaboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-197
AsbestosComments %/Type %/Type
98 OTHER17-6983 197-SC-02 BLACK NONFIBROUS 2 CHRYSOTILE
5 VERMICULITE
95 OTHER
17-6985 197-SP-01 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND
25 VERMICULITE
75 OTHER
17-6986 197-SP-02 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND
5 VERMICULITE
95 OTHER
17-6987 197-SP-03 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND
5 VERMICULITE
95 OTHER
17-6988 197-SP-04 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND
2 VERMICULITE
98 OTHER
17-6989 197-SP-05 BEIGE NONFIBROUS ND
Page 6 of 6
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report
may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there
have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include
floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these
materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane WasilewskiLaboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.376 Crompton Street Charlotte, NC 28273
Tel/Fax: (704) 525-2205 / (704) 525-2382
http://www.EMSL.com / [email protected]
EMSL Order: 411705969
Customer ID: SMEI54
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Jane Wasilewski Phone: (704) 940-1830
S&ME, Inc. Fax: (704) 565-4929
9771D Southern Pine Blvd. Received Date: 08/04/2017 11:40 AM
Charlotte, NC 28273 Analysis Date: 08/07/2017
Collected Date:
4213-17-197Project:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound Materials by TEM via
EPA/600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1
Sample ID Description Appearance % Matrix Material % Non-Asbestos Fibers Asbestos Types
197-CB-03
411705969-0001
Mastic Only Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
100 None No Asbestos Detected
197-DM-03
411705969-0002
Mastic Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
100 None No Asbestos Detected
197-FT-03
411705969-0003
Tile Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
100 None No Asbestos Detected
197-FT-03
411705969-0004
Mastic Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
100 None No Asbestos Detected
Analyst(s)
Derrick Young (4) Lee Plumley, Laboratory Manager
or other approved signatory
This laboratory is not responsible for % asbestos in total sample when the residue only is submitted for analysis. The above report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced,
except in full, without written approval by EMSL Analytical , Inc. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with
multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Charlotte, NC
Initial report from: 08/08/2017 08:19:48
ASB_PLMEPANOB_0012_0002 Printed 8/8/2017 8:19:54AM Page 1 of 1
SUMMARY OF XRF SPECTRUM LEAD ANALYZER READINGS
FIRE STATION 16
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 4213-17-197
DATE OF TESTING: 7-28-17
XLN
No.Site Floor Side Room Structure Component Color Substrate Condition Results
Action
LevelLead Units
1 Shutter Cal 2.65 mg/cm2
2 Calibrate 1 mg/cm2
3 Calibrate 1 mg/cm2
4 Calibrate 1 mg/cm2
5 Fire Station 16 First A Laundry Wall Grey Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
6 Fire Station 16 First A Laundry Rack Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
7 Fire Station 16 First A Laundry Rack Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
8 Fire Station 16 First A Laundry Door Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
9 Fire Station 16 First A Laundry Door Grey Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
10 Fire Station 16 First D Bay Trim Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
11 Fire Station 16 First C Bay Panel Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
12 Fire Station 16 First D Bay Door Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
13 Fire Station 16 First D Bay Door Casing Grey Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
14 Fire Station 16 First B Bay Door Casing Grey Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
15 Fire Station 16 First B Bay Door Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
16 Fire Station 16 First B Bay Window Frame Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
17 Fire Station 16 First B Living Room Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
18 Fire Station 16 First B Living Room Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
19 Fire Station 16 First B Living Room Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
20 Fire Station 16 First A Living Room Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
21 Fire Station 16 First A Living Room Door Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
22 Fire Station 16 First A Living Room Door Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
23 Fire Station 16 First A Living Room Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
24 Fire Station 16 First D Kitchen Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
25 Fire Station 16 First D Kitchen Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
26 Fire Station 16 First D Kitchen Door Casing Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
1 of 4
SUMMARY OF XRF SPECTRUM LEAD ANALYZER READINGS
FIRE STATION 16
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 4213-17-197
DATE OF TESTING: 7-28-17
XLN
No.Site Floor Side Room Structure Component Color Substrate Condition Results
Action
LevelLead Units
27 Fire Station 16 First B Kitchen Door Casing Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
28 Fire Station 16 First B Kitchen Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
29 Fire Station 16 First C Utility Room Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0.02 mg/cm2
30 Fire Station 16 First C Hall Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
31 Fire Station 16 First C Hall Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
32 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom C Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
33 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom C Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
34 Fire Station 16 First B Bathroom C Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
35 Fire Station 16 First B Bathroom C Door Casing Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
36 Fire Station 16 First B Bathroom C Wall Casing Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
37 Fire Station 16 First B Bathroom C Wall Casing Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
38 Fire Station 16 First D Bathroom B Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
39 Fire Station 16 First D Bathroom B Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
40 Fire Station 16 First D Bathroom B Stall Red Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0.4 mg/cm2
41 Fire Station 16 First D Bathroom B Stall Red Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0.4 mg/cm2
42 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom B Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
43 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom B Door Casing Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
44 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom A Door Casing Blue Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
45 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom A Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
46 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom A Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
47 Fire Station 16 First C Bathroom A Wall Beige Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
48 Fire Station 16 First B Large Bedroom Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
49 Fire Station 16 First D Large Bedroom Locker Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
50 Fire Station 16 First C Large Bedroom Door Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
51 Fire Station 16 First C Large Bedroom Door Casing Blue Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
2 of 4
SUMMARY OF XRF SPECTRUM LEAD ANALYZER READINGS
FIRE STATION 16
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 4213-17-197
DATE OF TESTING: 7-28-17
XLN
No.Site Floor Side Room Structure Component Color Substrate Condition Results
Action
LevelLead Units
52 Fire Station 16 First A Large Bedroom Wall Blue Drywall Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
53 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Trim Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
54 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Trim White Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
55 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Trim White Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0.01 mg/cm2
56 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Door Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
57 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Door Casing Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
58 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Door Casing Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
59 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Door Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
60 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Rail Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
61 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Rail Yellow Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0.3 mg/cm2
62 Fire Station 16 First C Exterior Trim Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
63 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
64 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim White Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
65 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim White Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
66 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Tank White Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
67 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Bollard Yellow Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
68 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
69 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim White Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
70 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim White Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
71 Fire Station 16 First B Exterior Trim Grey Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
72 Fire Station 16 First A Exterior Bay Door Casing Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
3 of 4
SUMMARY OF XRF SPECTRUM LEAD ANALYZER READINGS
FIRE STATION 16
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
S&ME PROJECT NO. 4213-17-197
DATE OF TESTING: 7-28-17
XLN
No.Site Floor Side Room Structure Component Color Substrate Condition Results
Action
LevelLead Units
73 Fire Station 16 First D Exterior Door Casing Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
74 Fire Station 16 First D Exterior Door Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
75 Fire Station 16 First D Exterior Trim Grey Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
76 Fire Station 16 First D Exterior Trim White Wood Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
77 Fire Station 16 First D Exterior Trim White Metal Intact Negative 0.7 0 mg/cm2
78 Calibrate 1 mg/cm2
79 Calibrate 1.1 mg/cm2
80 Calibrate 1.1 mg/cm2
SCDHEC requires special disposal for paint containing lead >0.7 mg/cm2
OSHA does not recognize a concentration of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration a worker is exposed.
4 of 4