26
Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to Improve Student Outcomes Dr. Faye R. Jones Dr. Marcia A. Mardis Florida State University Supported in part by NSF 1700581 (2017-2020) 2019

Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to Improve

Student Outcomes

Dr. Faye R. Jones

Dr. Marcia A. Mardis

Florida State University

Supported in part by NSF 1700581

(2017-2020)2019

Page 2: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Today’s Agenda

1. Alumni Tracking

FITC Example

Promising Practices

1. Alumni Backtracking

Goal-Path Theory

Scenario: Lisa’s Journey

Demo (Illustration Video)

Implications and Limitations

1. Next Steps and Further Research2. Q&A

Page 3: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking

Page 4: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni TrackingFoundational Work

• Florida IT Career (FITC) Alliance (funded by Florida Board of Governors; $1.9M, 2 years)

• Focus on BS in IT, CS, CE in North Florida State Colleges and Universities

• 2013 – 2018 (5 years of reporting)

• Increase enrollment, retention, and completion rates

• Monitor and improve completer outcomes within a year of graduation:

• In-field employment

• Salary

• Extent to which students remain in FL

Page 5: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking (FITC) Questions

• What percentage of alumni in CS, CE, and IT are employed in-field within a year of obtaining their undergraduate degree?

• What are the salaries of alumni in these majors after they have graduated from these programs?

• Where (geographically) are students employed after graduation? To what extent are these students employed in state (i.e., Florida) after graduation?

Page 6: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

• Define a successful completer.

• What outcomes should a successful graduate from your program achieve (at a minimum) as it relates to employment?

• The vision…

• guides survey questionnaire creation

• defines “successful employment”

• prioritizes contexts of institution and state

• Where would you expect most of your graduates to go (geographically)?

• Are they more likely to go public or private sector?

• What have you exposed them to in order to justify these conclusions?

• Can you link your curriculum to these outcomes?

• What other sorts of services and activities do you offer to support these outcomes?

Alumni Tracking (FITC) Strategic Planning

Page 7: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking (FITC)Internal Institutional Considerations

• Obtain IRB approval

• Identify institutional policies that govern student/alumni surveys (Policies on alumni outreach).

• Minimize student response fatigue

• Who else sends alumni surveys? When? How often?

• Leverage appropriate institutional data sources for most current student contact information

Page 8: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

• Watch for nicknames, maiden names, common names, etc.

• Graduation list is updated daily. Keep original list.

• Take note of double majors – will you double count them?

• Consider variables to be collected longitudinally.

• Define a collection window

• Keep Data Analysis in mind. Determine supplemental data to be used (embed before, merge after, both).

• Ensure you have an IR specialist on team

Alumni Tracking (FITC) Data Collection Pre-planning

Page 9: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking (FITC) Data Collection Embed/Merge Examples

• Embed the source

• Embed Supplemental Data• Student ID

• Merge• Demographic info

• Performance Indicators

Page 10: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking (FITC) Alumni Survey QuestionsEmployment

• Please check the box(es) that describe(s) your current status.

❑I have a full-time job.

❑I have a part-time job.

❑I am not working because I choose to be unemployed.

❑I am not working, but not by choice.

❑I am not working (no reason provided).

• My job is located in (City) , (State) . (Note: We added international location option).

• My job is in a field related to my bachelor’s degree. Please check ◻ Yes or ◻ No

• My total annual salary is:

❑$16,000 or less

❑$16,001 to $32,000

❑$32,001 to $48,000

❑$48,001 or more

Survey questions provided by FL Board of Governors

Page 11: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

• Source 1: Surveys -Individual emails• Primary and secondary emails from multiple sources• Challenges

• Survey fatigue

• Survey timing (multiple attempts by others to contact student)

• Those without a job are least likely to respond

• Source 2: Phone Calls • Challenges:

• Disconnected numbers

• Uncomfortable calls (e.g., disgruntled students, esp. if unemployed).

• Less likely to provide salary and person information over the phone.

• More likely to get partial responses.

• Source 3: Social Media• Requires fast response from alumni• Script• Facebook

• limit before blocking

• Requires ongoing connections with student beyond graduation

• FITC Population• Cohort 1 (CH1) (2013-14) = 258 alumni in CS, CE, IT; Cohort 2 (CH2)

(2014-15) = 312; Total CH1 & CH2 = 570

Collection

Method

Response

Rate (%)

Unreachable

(%)

Survey

Invitation

(Primary

emails)

114 (20%) 114 (20%)

Bounced

Survey

Invitation

(secondary

emails)

29 (5%) 103 (18%)

Phone Calls 29 (5%) 97 (17%)

Social

Media

153 (27%) 46 (8%)

Total

Response

325 (58%)

Alumni Tracking (FITC) Data CollectionOverlapping Sources

Page 12: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Qualtrics Insight Platform and Social Media

Page 13: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Q1 – What percentage of CS, CE, and IT BS completers are employed after a year?

• 325 responded to the survey

• 308 (or 94%) reported employment information.

• Of the 308 employed alumni

• 292 or 95% were employed full-time

• 16 or 5% were employed part-time.

• 87% were working in a field related to their major

• 2% were self-employed.

• 11% of responders indicated that they were enrolled in college.

Alumni Tracking Results (FITC)

Page 14: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Q2 – What are alumni salaries?

35% (n=107) $48,001 - $64,000

29% (n=89) $32,001 - $48,000

14% (n=43) $64,001- $80,000

10% (n=31) $16,001 - $32,000

4% (n=12) $16,000 or less.

The two highest salary categories, $80,001-$100,000

and $100,001 or more each had 4% of respondents

(n=12 each).

Figure shows, graduates of the three programs tend to

secure jobs with salaries in excess of $32,000 per year.

Note: 88% went into the private sector.\Responders (N=306)

Alumni Tracking Results (FITC)

Page 15: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking Results (FITC)

Q3 – Where are our students employed?

• 80% (n=230) of graduates are

employed on the east coast

• 19% (n=55) employed in mid

or western U.S.

• 1% (n=2) employed overseas

Maps created with Google Maps

Page 16: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Alumni Tracking Results (FITC)

Q3 – In-state employment location by major

Figure shows 55% (or 158 out of 287) all FSU CE,

IT, and CS alumni were employed in Florida.

• highest concentrations (n=132) employed in

central and south Florida.

• Of those living in North Florida (n=26), 95%

(n=24) of them resided in a major city (e.g.,

Jacksonville, Pensacola, or Tallahassee), or in a

tourist city such as Panama City.

• remaining 2 graduates live in small towns or rural

locations.

Q3b. Are they in Florida?

Page 17: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Backtracking Alumni Pathways

Page 18: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

= Influencer

=Hindrance

=Critical Juncture

Deeper into Path-Goal Theory

Formal Learning

(coursework)

Informal Learning

(Clubs, Mentors)

Experiential

Learning

(Internships, Jobs)

Goal 1

Student

Outcome

Graduation

Goal 2

Completer

Outcome

Higher Ed/

Employment

…but in REVERSE!

Page 19: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Backtracking Alumni

Supplement

quantitative

data with in-

depth

participant

experiences

gained

through

interviews.

Interview to

saturation.

Page 20: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Individual Pathway Scenario: Sample Interview Data

Completion: Graduating with a 3.2 GPA and an IT AS, Lisa interviewed at Municode and because her

communication skills were so strong, became a Network Design scrum leader.

Semester 8 (9 credits): Critical Juncture: Lisa failed her certification exam and is discouraged. Hindrance:

The college’s career counselors didn’t offer her any alternatives. Desperate, Lisa reaches out to former

Technical Writing teacher. He encourages her to sit for the exam again, but advises Lisa to take a

Advanced Networking course first (Influencer), along with Hardware Fundamentals and Storytelling, for

relaxation and fun. He also called his contact at Municode (Influencer). His contact was eager to keep

Lisa at Municode because she was a great intern.

Semester 7 (9 credits): Influencer: Lisa is a paid intern at Municode, while completing her final courses,

including Network Topology, the course which was supposed to prepare her for the Cisco Certified

Design Associate certification. Influencer: She has learned time management strategies from Raul and

his peer support team and is able to balance her internship and two other courses.

Semester 6 (12 credits): With a loan from her mother, Lisa got a scooter. The money she saved on gas

went into her certification fee fund. Lisa completed her Network Fundamentals course, along with three

other courses. Critical Juncture: Unable to work, Lisa connected with the student pantry and emergency

fund to tide her over until she could begin working again.

Page 21: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Semester 5 (0 credits): Lisa participates in a local “job hop” (Influencer) led by her Technical Writing instructor, which included a visit to Municode. Lisa liked the work environment and saw herself there. Influencer: Lisa’s instructor introduced her to a manager who said that all Municode employees had relevant certifications. Lisa also enrolled in Network Fundamentals. Critical Juncture Lisa’s car broke down and she had a hard time getting to school. (Hindrance): She took an Incomplete in Network Fundamentals.

Semester 4 (6 credits): Lisa interned at Ghostly, a local cybersecurity firm. She found the security work boring, but realized she had a flair for network design. She took the Technical Writing course and earned a 3.0! She credited her great instructor. Influencer: Lisa reported that with faculty support she became confident enough to start writing cover letters and a resume!

Semester 3 (8 credits): With Raul’s support, Lisa re-took her English course and passed. She also took a CAD course and realized why algebra is important!

Semester 2 (8 credits): Lisa took remedial algebra courses and, culminating in a 2.6 GPA, but she failed her English course, despite tutoring. Critical Juncture! Lisa’s college connected her with Raul, a peer writing coach (Influencer).

Semester 1 (8 credits): Lisa was dual-enrolled while in a high school and earned 8 credits and a Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) certificate, but she remembered neglecting writing and algebra skills in high school (Hindrance).

Individual Pathway Scenario: Sample Interview Data

Page 22: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

What does this look like in practice?For each participant, aggregate:

1. Layer 1: Institutional Research and College Data (IR Data)

2. Layer 2: Completer and Alumni Data (Surveys, 6 mo - 1yr after graduation)

For selected participants, integrate:

1. Layer 3: Pathway Explanatory Model (Interview to Saturation)

Results allow you to identify:

● Recurring critical junctures, including weak spots in curriculum

● Effective and needed student supports

● Placement of soft skills opportunities within student experiences

● The interplay between formal and informal learning experiences

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHz8vhLKR4c

Page 23: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Next Steps / Future Research

Page 24: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Next Steps for Alumni Tracking Research

• Longitudinal Alumni Tracking• Use of alumni data to investigate and evaluate academic program efficacy• Post-graduation completer outcomes are becoming THE performance

metric for assessing program and student success (not just program completion).

• Automate IR dashboards to inform inquiry and share with others

• Use data to fuel change and improve decision-making

• Leverage various social media platforms to bolster alumni outreach and participation (RR)

• Use data to inform local economic contribution ROI models

• Not many CCs have time or expertise to do this…how do we build capacity?

Page 25: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Office of Alumni Employment Tracking Support Services (OAETSS)

Recognize

Institutional

Factors

Recognize

Student

Employment

Factors

Recognize

Program

Factors

Program and

student

employment

Goals and

Expectations

Office of

Alumni and

Employment

Tracking

Support

Services

(OAETSS)

1. Stress

Employability

Factors

And Student

Goals

2. Integrate Social

Media (e.g.,

LinkedIn) into

Coursework

learning

Outcomes

3. Conduct

Regular

Student and

Employer

Data Collection

and

Analysis

4. Promote

Student Employer

Networking

5. Other

considerations

Tracking of

Employment

Information

Upon

Graduation or

Program

Departure

External

Data

Sources

Integrate IR

sources

Alumni

Employment

Database

(AEDB)

Strategies

to Update

and Expand

Student and

Employment

Data

Reports from

Alumni

Employment

Database

1. Update

Student

Employment

Goals

2. Reassess

Success

Strategies of the

Office of Alumni

Employment

3. Revise

Curriculum as

Needed

4. Reduce

Institutional and

Program Barriers

Affecting Tracking

5. Other

considerations

Feedback

Page 26: Backtracking Alumni: Using Institutional Research to

Questions?

This research was supported in part by NSF 1304382, 1700581, and the

Florida Board of Governors TeAMs Grant Program

Dr. Marcia A. Mardis

Professor & Associate Dean, CCI

[email protected]

Dr. Faye R. Jones

Faculty Researcher, CCI

[email protected]