Barrier Removal Day

June 8, 2011

Flow of the day• 9:00-9:50

– Presentation 1: Big Picture-Barrier Removal- where we are at and where we are going?

• 9:50-10:00-Break• 10:00-11:00: Guided assessment-Improving your action plan• 11:00-12:00-Individual work time• 12:00-1:00-Lunch• 1:00-1:30-Individual work time• 1:30-2:20-Group Sharing/Presentation• 2:20-2:30-Break• 2:30-3:00-Presentation 2: Improving your MPA-GMP/Grading system• 3:00-4:00-Individual work time

Objectives for the day

By the end of the day CFs will: • Understand big picture purpose of BROP• Improve action plan in relation to indicators

that need clearer next steps• Understand GMP/BROP grading• Complete GMP/BROP document• Identify steps needed to set up monitoring of

BC, BR, and TR [if we have time]

Big Picture

[9:00-9:50]

• Objectives: At the end of the session, the CFs will be able to:– Appreciate their accomplishments in Barrier Removal: Big

Picture– Identify relevant key indicators in the management focus

Presentation

1. The overarching objectives of MPA Governance (BR framework)

2. The phases of MPA Governance (PEP 2 methodology)

1. MPA Governance Framework (BR): Objectives

Based on the cohort hypothesis:

• Improve MPA governance• Improve MPA enforcement

• Each MPA should reach 1 level higher or maintain Level 3 “enforced” or higher by July 2012

Why MPA governance and enforcement?

• Identified as the 2 key BR strategies during initial evaluation of TOC documents in March 2010 (Cebu workshop).

• Governance = the processes by which leaders are selected and how organizational policies are formulated and reviewed

• Enforcement is an important part of Governance and essential to MPA success so we highlighted it

TWG [in place with EO]

• Integral part of the BR and Social Marketing infrastructure

• Assist with implementation of MPA governance (BR) and Social Marketing campaign

• Done, but needs strengthening

PEP Methodology:the four Phases of MPA Governance (BR)

PCRA-FGDs, Community Reef Survey and MPA Effectiveness [April-May 2011]

Planning [MPA-GMP] [May-June2011]

Implementation [June 2011-June2012]

Monitoring and Evaluation

1. PCRA

• Setting up ManCom-Done, but needs to be guided constantly and strengthened

• MERF Baseline-Done, but need to inform Monitoring Plan [CR portion], updated annually

• Community reef monitoring-Done, but need to inform Monitoring Plan and strengthen the team; updated annually

• PCRA FGDs-Done, but need to be updated annually• MPA Effectiveness-Done, but need to be repeated in

June 2012

2. Planning (BROP) [all done]

• But, needs enhancement/improvement: How?– Workshop [later today]– Sessions: A combination of workshops and

presentations [later in Module 3]• TWG and ManCom Strengthening [June 24]• Climate Smarting our MPAs [June 30]• Setting up the Enforcement Continuum [July 6]• MPA Financing [July 7]• Site Visit in Handuman [MSN Awarded]

3. Implementation

• Implement MPA Governance plan as part of the MPA, in coordination with TWG and ManCom

Implementation of MPA Governance and Management Plan BR

Implementation of Monitoring Plan CR

June 2011-June 2012

• Monitoring Plan [TR, BC, BR metrics] ongoing and in progress feedback

• MPA Effectiveness [annual]

4. Monitoring and Evaluation-[Monitoring Plan and MPA Effectiveness]

Implementation of Monitoring Plan CR

June 2011-June 2012

Summary

• Discussed the four phases of MPA Governance (BR)

PCRA-FGDs, Community Reef Survey and MPA Effectiveness [April-May 2011]

Planning [MPA-GMP] [May-June2011]

Implementation [June 2011-June2012] Monitoring and

Evaluation [July 2011-June 2012]

Workshop: Improving your 6. Action Plans-Identifying key relevant indicators in the

management focus

• Objectives: This session will present:– The cohort analysis on MPA rating – Identify critical management focus: areas that needs

improvement

• Expected output– Improved Action Plan [key activities to address relevant

indicators]

• Process:– Presentation– Series of Workshop: Groups, Individual and grouping

• Materials:– Action plan– Series of Workshop: Individual and grouping

Guided Assessment 1: Whole Group

• Identify the relevant indicators in each management focus that requires work or maintain [if achieved] to up to Level 3

– Instructions:• Open your MPA form tab [I sent you yesterday]• Open action plan tab• Write the indicators identified as we go along• Highlight the added indicators to distinguish them from

original

MPA In

itiated

MPA Esta

blished

MPA Enforce

d

MPA Su

stained

MPA In

stitu

tionalize

d02468

1012141618

MPA effectiveness Rating

How to get to level 2 and 3?

Collaborative patrolling and surveillance, records maintained and open to everyone; Education program sustained for public awareness; Fishing

effectively stopped within MPA; Illegal and destructive fishing reduced outside of MPA [5 km radius]; Budget from LGU or other resources allotted

and accessible for MPA management; MB active and supported by legal instrument; MPA; billboards/boundary markers maintained

Ordinance passed and approved; MP adopted and legitimized by the LGU; MB formed and functional; Budget for Year 1 allocated;

Enforcement initiative allocated; Boundaries delineated; Signboards and billboards; MPA outposts and other structures; Biophysical

monitoring [7/17]

Level 1: 10/17

These are PERFORMANCE

INDICATORS. Build on this Level fast; use this

Level to build evidence to get to the

next Level:

These are RESULTS INDICATORS. If you document well your

achievements in level 2 , Level 3 will

be easy

Management plan

Management Body

Legal Instru

ment

Community ParticipationFinance IEC

EnforcementM&E

Maintenance and Infrastructure

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

Management Focus

1st

2nd 3rd

4th

5th

6th 7th

L2/1

3 [Enforce

ment a

ctiviti

es initiate

d]

L2/1

5 [Boundari

es deli

neated

]

L3/2

5 [Colla

borative

patrollin

g]

L3/2

5 [Fish

ing insid

e MPA]

L3/2

6 [Fish

ing outsi

de of M

PA]L4

/30

L4/3

60

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Enforcement

Guided Assessment 1: Identify enforcement key indicators that needs work

• L2/13 [Enforcement activities initiated]• L2/15 [Boundaries delineated]• L3/21 [Collaborative patrolling-PNP,

Surveillance, Fish Wardens]• L3/25 [Fishing inside MPA stopped]• L3/26 [Illegal Fishing outside of MPA reduced]

L1/5

[MB te

ntative

ly dete

rmined

]

L2/1

1 [MB fo

rmed

and fu

nctional]

L3/2

0 [MB ac

tive an

d supporte

d by leg

al instr

ument]

L4/2

9 [MB ca

pable

to run th

e MPA in

depen

dently

]

L4/3

2 MP perf

orman

ce m

onitored

MB capac

itated

for fu

nd sourci

ng0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Management Body

Guided Assessment 1: Identify management body key indicators that needs work

• L1/5 [MB tentatively determined]• L2/11 [MB formed and functional]• L3/20 [MB active and supported by legal

instrument]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Maintenance of infrastructure and Site Development

Guided Assessment 1: Identify maintenance of infra key indicators that needs work

• L2/16 [Signboards/billboards posted]• L2/17 [MPA outpost and other structures]• L3/22 [MPA structures maintained]

L1/2

[Site

surve

yed usin

g stan

dard m

ethods]

L2/1

8 [Biophysi

cal m

onitorin

g inclu

ding loca

l parti

cipati

on]

L3/2

4 [Reg

ular parti

cipato

ry biophysi

cal m

onitorin

g]L4

/33

L4/3

4L5

/42

L5/4

302468

1012141618

Monitoring and Evaluation

Guided Assessment 1: Identify monitoring and evaluation key indicators that needs work

• L1/2 [Site surveyed using standard methods]• L2/18 [Biophysical monitoring including local

participation]• L3/24 [Regular participatory biophysical

monitoring]• Cohort: Include [1] MPA Rating in June 2012

and [2] Reference Monitoring Plan

L2/12 [Budget for Year 1 allocated]

L3/19 [Budget from LGU or from other sources allocated and accessible for

MPA MAnagement]

L4/28 L4/35 L5/490

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18 Financing

Guided Assessment 1: Identify financing indicators that needs work or how to maintain if you scored

• L2/12 [Budget for Year 1 implementation allocated]

• L3/19 [Budget from LGU or from other sources allocated and accessible for MPA Management]

02468

1012141618

IEC

Guided Assessment 1: Identify IEC indicators that needs work

• L1/7 [Education program raising awareness about MPA functions]

• L2/14 [IEC activities conducted]• L3/23 Education program sustained

L1/4 [Preliminary Management Plan

drafted]

L2/10 [MP adopted and legitimized by

the LGU]

L4/27 L5/38 L6/390

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Management Plan

Guided Assessment 1: Identify management plan indicators that

needs work

• L1/4 [Preliminary Management Plan drafted]• L2/10 [MP adopted and legitimized by the

LGU]

Individual Work Time [11:00-1:30]

• Inform the following columns:– Smart objectives [Establish enforcement system by

August 2011]– Specific activities [i.e. Training of fish wardens, install

logbook in guardhouse, install surveillance team]– Persons responsible [FT-Andres Pal-ing]– Time frame [July 2011]– Budget [25T]– Source of budget [LGU, external, Rare/BR Funds-]– Support needed [BFAR, DENR, DILG]

Grouping Sharing Activity [1:30-2:20]Group 1 [Mga Tits: Vince, Cherry, Ate Ruby,

Renante]Group 2 [Mga Tits: Ate Annabele, Armando,

Jovenal, Dag]Group 3 [Mga Tits: Sheryll, Beth, Cathy, Ate Deza]

2. Write all outputs in a manila paper [per group]

3. Group presentation [choose 1 presenter]4. Refer to the groups outputs [if applicable]-to

enhance your MPA-GMP

Improving your MPA-GMP

[2:30-4:00]

Objectives:

• At the end of the session the CFs will be able to:– Explain how the MPA Governance and

Management Plan (MPA-GMP) fits into the PEP Methodology and Campaign plan

– Identify gaps in the document and finalize your MPA GMP

Process:

• Presentation [30 minutes]– Objectives of the MPA Governance and

Management Plan (BROP) – What is the MPA-GMP?– MPA-GMP Template– Run through the whole MPA-GMP document and

grading system

Objectives of MPA-GMP:

• To be the steering document for all MPAs to achieve governance and enforcement [Level 3 ‘enforced’]

• To consolidate the results of all the PCRA into action plan and provide a guide for implementers

• To clarify who, what, how and when for MPA governance plus source, support needed

What is MPA-GMP (BROP)?

• A guide for the implementers (TWG / ManCom) that analyzes results of PCRA and offers a road map for improving MPA governance

• A document containing what, when who, budget

• A living document that will be enhanced throughout the Module 3

Rundown of documents:

• MPA-GMP Format– Please take into account dates for:• Vulnerability Assessment [CC stuff]• Fisheries Survey [Biomass]• Biophysical survey [monitoring]

• Grading system

Individual Work Time: 3:00-4:00

• Finalize MPA-GMP [taking into account grading system]

• Deadline for submission: 11:00 PM emailed to me CC Ariela and Your PPMs

• Long Paper Size