Basic Assessment Report

The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.

Basic Assessment

Report Proposed Development of a Shell service station in Parklands, Western Cape.

Draft Basic Assessment Report April 2013 www.erm.com

Shell South Africa Marketing (Pty) Ltd

Draft Basic Assessment Report:

Proposed Development of a Shell Service Station, in Parklands

April 2013

www.erm.com ERM Reference: 0156639

Prepared by: Lindsey Bungartz and Aabida Davis

This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Southern Africa (Pty) Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. .

For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: Brett Lawson

Signed: Position: Partner Date: 02 April 2013

1

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT (AUGUST 2010)

Basic Assessment Report in terms of the NEMA Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010

AUGUST 2010 Kindly note that: 1. This Basic Assessment Report is the standard report required by DEA&DP in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2010 and must be

completed for all Basic Assessment applications. 2. This report must be used in all instances for Basic Assessment applications for an environmental authorisation in terms of the

National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998) (NEMA), as amended, and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010, and/or a waste management licence in terms of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (Act 59 of 2008) (NEM: WA), and/or an atmospheric emission licence in terms of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004 (Act No. 39 of 2004) (NEM: AQA).

3. This report is current as of 2 August 2010. It is the responsibility of the Applicant / EAP to ascertain whether subsequent

versions of the report have been published or produced by the competent authority.

4. The required information must be typed within the spaces provided in the report. The sizes of the spaces provided are not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. It is in the form of a table that will expand as each space is filled with typing.

5. Incomplete reports will be rejected. A rejected report may be amended and resubmitted. 6. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection. Where it is used in respect of material

information that is required by the Department for assessing the application, this may result in the rejection of the report as provided for in the regulations.

7. While the different sections of the report only provide space for provision of information related to one alternative, if more

than one feasible and reasonable alternative is considered, the relevant section must be copied and completed for each alternative.

8. Unless protected by law all information contained in, and attached to this report, will become public information on

receipt by the competent authority. If information is not submitted with this report due to such information being protected by law, the applicant and/or EAP must declare such non-disclosure and provide the reasons for the belief that the information is protected.

9. This report must be submitted to the Department at the postal address given below or by delivery thereof to the Registry

Office of the Department. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted. Please note that for waste management licence applications, this report must be submitted for the attention of the Department’s Waste Management Directorate (tel: 021-483-2756 and fax: 021-483-4425) at the same postal address as the Cape Town Office Region A.

10. Unless indicated otherwise, two electronic copies (CD/DVD) and three hard copies of this report must be submitted to the

Department.

DEPARTMENTAL DETAILS

CAPE TOWN OFFICE REGION A (Cape Winelands, City of Cape Town: Tygerberg and Oostenberg Administrations)

CAPE TOWN OFFICE REGION B (West Coast, Overberg, City of Cape Town: Helderberg, South Peninsula, Cape Town and Blaauwberg Administrations

GEORGE OFFICE (Eden and Central Karoo)

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Attention: Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A2) Private Bag X 9086 Cape Town, 8000 Registry Office 1st Floor Utilitas Building 1 Dorp Street, Cape Town Queries should be directed to the Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A2) at: Tel: (021) 483-4793 Fax: (021) 483-3633

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Attention: Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region B) Private Bag X 9086 Cape Town, 8000 Registry Office 1st Floor Utilitas Building 1 Dorp Street, Cape Town Queries should be directed to the Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region B) at: Tel: (021) 483-4094 Fax: (021) 483-4372

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Attention: Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A1) Private Bag X 6509 George, 6530 Registry Office 4th Floor, York Park Building 93 York Street George Queries should be directed to the Directorate: Integrated Environmental Management (Region A1) at: Tel: (044) 805 8600 Fax: (044) 874-2423

View the Department’s website at http://www.capegateway.gov.za/eadp for the latest version of this document.

http://www.capegateway.gov.za/eadp

2

DEPARTMENTAL REFERENCE NUMBER(S) File reference number (EIA): File reference number (Waste): File reference number (Other): PROJECT TITLE Proposed Development of a Shell service station in Parklands, Western Cape. The proposed installation of four X 46m3 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) for the storage of fuel at a proposed Shell service station in Parklands, Western Cape. DETAILS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER (EAP)

Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP): Environmental Resources Management (ERM) Southern Africa

Contact person: Tania Swanepoel Postal address: Postnet Suite 90, Private Bag, X12, Tokai

Postal code: 8000 Telephone: (021 ) 681 5400 Cell: 079 885 0135

E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 021 686 0736 EAP Qualifications B.Sc (Hons) (Geology); B.Sc (Hons) (Engineering & Env Geology)

EAP Registrations/Associations Pr Sci Nat International Association for Impact Assessment, South Africa (IAIA SA)

Details of the EAP’s expertise to carry out Basic Assessment procedures Tania Swanepoel is a Principal Consultant in the Impact Assessment team based in Cape Town, South Africa. Tania has over 14 years of experience in environmental consulting and engineering geology. Her experience includes environmental impact assessments, basic assessments, contaminated site investigations and risk assessments, remedial system monitoring and project management. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE CONTENT OF THE BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT: Shell South Africa Marketing (Pty) Ltd (Shell) is proposing to construct a service station on the corner of Sandown Road and Wood Drive in Parklands. The service station will have an on-site storage capacity of 184m3 for the storage of dangerous goods (diesel and petroleum), therefore triggering the need for a Basic Assessment (Listing Notice 1 (GN No R.544) Activity 13: “The construction of facilities or infrastructure for the storage, or storage and handling of a dangerous good, where such storage occurs in containers with a combined capacity of 80 cubic metres but not exceeding 500 cubic metres).” The product will be stored in four (4) Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), each with a capacity of 46m3. The service station will have infrastructure associated with the USTs such as underground pipelines connecting the USTs to the dispenser island for fuel dispensing, and breathing pipes to release any pressure build up within the USTs. The proposed site is located on erf 5940 (vacant) which is approximately 7600m2 in size. Residential areas are located adjacent to the South and East of the site and vacant land is located adjacent to the North and West of the site. The site is currently not zoned and a rezoning application is underway in terms of the Land Use Planning Ordinance( LUPO) to allow for the construction of a service station. The service station will have add-on services such as a fast food restaurant, car wash and convenience store. Water from the car wash will be treated before it is released into the municipal wastewater system (sewage system). It is anticipated that approximately 1100m3 of waste water will be treated annually. Used cooking oil from the restaurant facility will be collected by a licensed waste removal company and will be disposed at a licensed waste facility. An oil/water separator will be installed on the forecourt and all runoff from the forecourt, as well as stormwater will be directed to the oil/water separator. The oil/water separator will be cleaned, serviced and inspected regularly by a certified hazardous waste removal subcontractor. During the initial public participation phase, a number of stakeholders raised questions about the project that fall into the categories listed below: • potential groundwater and soil pollution; • possible decrease in surrounding property values; • risk of fires and explosions; and • employment opportunities. During the Basic Assessment (BA) process, a number of potential impacts were identified by the project team and these have been assessed, including the impacts associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning phases. A list of the potential impacts assessed have been included below:

3

• increase in traffic; • potential soil and groundwater contamination; • accidental fire and explosions; • air quality and dust; • loss of vegetation; • occupational health and safety; • employment opportunities; • possible decrease in surrounding property values • noise impacts; and • visual impacts.

Appropriate specialists were appointed to undertake the following studies: • Botanical Study; • Visual Impact Assessment; and • Traffic Impact Assessment.

The Botanical Study revealed that the site is degraded and there is no vegetation of conservation value on the site. Hence there were no serious biophysical constraints on the site. Three aspects of the development were identified for inclusion in the Visual Impact Assessment, namely: the service station, the lighting and the signage. The Visual Impact Assessment showed the service station and lighting is expected to be of a medium significance and signage medium- low significance after mitigation. A number of mitigation measures have been recommended which include mitigation through architectural measures, tree planting, careful lighting design, the use of reflectors as well as careful siting and design of signage. The Traffic Impact Assessment assessed the number of vehicles the service station would receive (trips) in the morning and evening peak periods. The calculations are a summation of vehicles received by the service station, the on site store and the fast food restaurant to be built. This assessment was done for the year 2014 (expected opening year of the service station) and the year 2020 (expected year most developments will be complete in Northern Parklands). The results are as follows: 50 trips are expected during the morning peak hour and 113 trips are expected during the evening peak hour per day in the year 2014. 60 trips are expected during the morning peak hour and 129 trips are expected during the evening peak hour per day in the year 2020. Most of the recommendations made in the TIA study, are directed towards Shell and the City of Cape Town. When Shell applies for access with the City of Cape Town, these recommendations will be discussed further.

An initial public participation process was conduct in 2012 and included the following activities: • A 30 day public registration period was initiated in May 2012; • A Background Information Document (BID) was distributed to surrounding landowners (within a 100m radius of the site)

including Parklands College, and Shoprite Checkers to the north of the site. A copy of the BID is included in Appendix F; • An advert was placed in TableTalk on Wednesday 30 May 2012 to inform the public of the commencement of the BA

process at the Parklands site; • Two site notices were placed on site to inform the public that an environmental impact assessment was taking place at

the site.; and • A poster was placed at Shoprite Checkers to inform the public of the commencement of the BA process at the Parklands

site. The Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR) will be released for a 40 day comment period, and comments received will be responded to and included in the Final BAR. Two layout Alternatives were assessed in the BAR. The layout of Alternative 1 has the convenience store and other add-on services situated in the north east portion of the site, while the south east corner will remain vacant for future use. Therefore the main activities associated with the service station will be located further away from the residential areas adjacent to the south and a portion of the east border of the site. The layout of Alternative 2 has the convenience store and other add-on services situated in the south east portion of the site, while the north east corner will remain vacant for future use. Therefore the main activities associated with the service station will be located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and a portion of the east border of the site. Through the impact assessment it was revealed that Layout 1 is the preferred alternative. The table below provides a list of the potential impacts assessed as well as their pre-and post- mitigation significance ratings. The potential impacts associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning of the Parklands Service Station, along with a pre and post mitigation signifigance rating are provided in the table below. Table 1: Construction/ Design Phase Impacts

Impact Pre Mitigation Post Mitigation Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Increased Traffic Low Negligible Visual Impact Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low

4

Impact on Air Quality (Alternative ) Medium Low to Medium Vegetation Loss (Alternative 1 and 2) Low Negligible Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Employment Creation (Alternative 1 and 2) Low Positive Low Positive Potential Loss of Cultural Heritage Resources (Alternative 1 and 2)

Negligible Negligible

Noise Impact (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Noise Impact (Alternative 2) Medium Low to Medium

Table 2: Operation Phase Impacts


Medium Low

Increased Traffic Low Negligible Visual Impact (Service Station) Medium to High Medium Visual Impact (Lighting) Medium to High Medium Visual Impact (Signage) Medium Medium to Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1 and 2) Low Low Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Medium Low

Employment Creation (Alternative 1 and 2) Low to Medium Positive Medium Positive Effect of Property Values (Alternative 1 and 2) Low N/A Noise Impact (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Noise Impact (Alternative 2) Medium Low to Medium

Table 3: Decomissioning Phase Impacts


Low to Medium Low

Increased Traffic Low Low Visual Impact Low to Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative ) Medium Low to Medium Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Loss of Employment (Alternative 1 and 2) Medium to High Medium Noise Impact (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Noise Impact (Alternative 2) Medium Low to Medium

Mitigation measures that must be adhered to during the design, construction, operation and decommissioning phases have been included in an Environmental Management Programme EMP (see Appendix H).

5

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

(a) Is the project a new development? YES NO

(b) Provide a detailed description of the development project and associated infrastructure. Shell is proposing to develop and operate a service station and associated add-on services on the corner of Sandown and Wood Drive, in Parklands, Western Cape. The project site is located on undeveloped (vacant) land, in the suburb of Parklands. Figure 1 below shows a view of the site looking south west.

Figure 1: Picture of the vacant site on which the proposed Shell service station is to be built The service station would consist of four 46m3 USTs and associated infrastructure. The total tank capacity on site would be 184m3. The development will entail the following infrastructure and add-on services: • 4 x 46m3 USTs; • associated pipelines; • pump islands and dispensers; • canopy; • paved forecourt; • convenience store; • fast food restaurant; • ATMS; • rest rooms; • car wash; and • vehicle access points. Appendix B includes site layout diagrams indicating the position and sizes of the infrastructure to be built on site.

6

Below is an expected visual model of the site looking south west from Sandown Road and north east from Wood Drive

Figure 2: Expected view looking south west from Sandown Road

Figure 3: Expected view looking north east from Wood Drive (c) List all the activities assessed during the Basic Assessment process: GN No. R. 544 Activity No(s):

Describe the relevant Basic Assessment Activity(ies) in writing as per Listing Notice 1 (GN No. R. 544)

Describe the portion of the development as per the project description that relates to the applicable listed activity.

Activity 13 The construction of facilities or infrastructure for the storage, or storage and handling of a dangerous good, where such storage occurs in containers with a combined capacity of 80 cubic metres but not exceeding 500 cubic metres.

Shell proposes to develop and operate a service station and associated infrastructure with a total on site dangerous good storage capacity of less than 500m3. Products (Diesel and Petroleum) will be stored in USTs below the service station forecourt.

GN No. R. 546 Activity No(s):

Describe the relevant Basic Assessment Activity(ies) in writing as per Listing Notice 3 (GN No. R. 546)


If the application is also for activities as per Listing Notice 2 and permission was granted to subject the application to Basic Assessment, also indicate the applicable Listing Notice 2 activities: GN No. R. 545 Activity No(s):

If permission was granted in terms of Regulation 20, describe the relevant Scoping and EIA Activity(ies) in writing as per Listing Notice 2 (GN No. R. 545)


Waste management activities in terms of the NEM: WA (Government Gazette No. 32368): GN No. 718 - Category A Activity No(s): Describe the relevant Category A waste management activity in writing.

Please note: If any waste management activities are applicable, the Listed Waste Management Activities Additional Information Annexure must be completed and attached to this Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.

7

If the application is also for waste management activities as per Category B and permission was granted to subject the application to Basic Assessment, also indicate the applicable Category B activities: GN No. 718 – Category B Activity No(s): Describe the relevant Category B waste management activity in writing.

Atmospheric emission activities in terms of the NEM: AQA (Government Gazette No. 33064): GN No. 248 Activity No(s): Describe the relevant atmospheric emission activity in writing.

(d) Please provide details of all components of the proposed project and attach diagrams (e.g. architectural drawings or

perspectives, engineering drawings, process flow charts etc.). All diagrams are included in Appendix B. Buildings YES NO Provide brief description: There will be one main building (between 270m2 and 500m2) on site which will house the following amenities: • offices; • restrooms (staff and public); • restaurant; • convenient store; and • dry/ cold stores. It is anticipated that the building will be located on the south eastern border of the site. A car wash facility will be constructed on site with three wash bays. It is anticipated that the car wash will be located to the south of the main on-site building (see Appendix B). Infrastructure (e.g. roads, power and water supply/ storage) YES NO Provide brief description: There is an existing short access road to the site. The existing site access road will be extended by 50 m to allow site users access to the dispenser islands and amenities. Bulk services such as power and water supply are not in place at the site. Proof of service confirmation will be included in the Final BAR in Appendix G. Water will be provided by the City of Cape Town and electricity will be provided by City of Cape Town. Processing activities (e.g. manufacturing, storage, distribution) YES NO Provide brief description: Storage facilities for raw materials and products (e.g. volume and substances to be stored) Provide brief description YES NO The service station will store fuel on site in four x 46m3 USTs, with a total on site capacity of 184m3. The USTs will store Diesel and Petroleum. Storage and treatment facilities for solid waste and effluent generated by the project Yes NO Provide brief description Water from the car wash facility and from the forecourt area will be treated by an on-site oil/water separator before discharge into the municipal sewage system. It is estimated that approximately 3000 litres will be treated per day. Shell will inspect the oil/water separator on a monthly basis and it will be cleaned by a Shell approved cleaning company. Used cooking oil from the restaurant kitchen facility will be collected from site by a private licenced waste removal company, and disposed of at a licenced waste facility. During the construction phase, rubble and other construction by-products will be generated. The construction rubble will be disposed of at a licenced landfill site which will have adequate capacity to absorb the additional waste. The total waste to be generated during the construction phase is expected to be 17m3. Waste by-products will be generated by the project during the operational phase which includes general office waste, waste water from the on-site car wash, and used cooking oil from the on-site restaurant. General office waste, that include paper, cardboard etc, will be stored in a general refuse area on site and will be collected regularly by the City of Cape Town Municipal contractors. Where possible general waste such as paper, plastic and cans will be recycled.

8

Other activities (e.g. water abstraction activities, crop planting activities) Yes NO Provide brief description Towards the completion of construction, certain areas will be landscaped.

2. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY Size of the property: (a) Indicate the size of the property (cadastral unit) on which the activity is to be undertaken. 7,600m2 Size of the facility: (b) Indicate the size of the facility (development area) on which the activity is to be undertaken. 4,000m2

Size of the activity: (c) Indicate the physical size (footprint) of the activity together with its associated infrastructure: 1184m2 (d) Indicate the physical size (footprint) of the activity: 200m2 (e) Indicate the physical size (footprint) of the associated infrastructure: 1000m2 and, for linear activities: Not applicable as this is not a linear project Length of the activity: (f) Indicate the length of the activity: m

3. SITE ACCESS

(a) Is there an existing access road? There is an existing short access road to the site. The existing site access road will be extended by 50 m to allow site users access to the dispenser islands and amenities. An additional access road will be built on site from Wood Drive The additional access road is expected to be between 30m and 50m in length (see Appendix B). Figure 4 below shows the existing site access road from Sandown Road i.e. left in access.

Figure4: Existing access road on site.

YES NO

(b) If no, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built? m c) Describe the type of access road planned:

9

Please Note: indicate the position of the proposed access road on the site plan. 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE ACTIVITY IS TO BE UNDERTAKEN AND THE

LOCATION OF THE ACTIVITY ON THE PROPERTY (a) Provide a description of the property on which the activity is to be undertaken and the location of the activity on the

property. The activity will take place on vacant land measuring approximately 7,600m2 (seven thousand, six hundred square metres) in size. The service station will occupy less than 50 percent of the available space on site, approximately 4, 000m2 (four thousand square meters). The installation of the USTs will occupy approximately 200m2 The property is surrounded by vacant land to the immediate north, west and north- west of the site. High density residential properties exist to the south, east and south east of the site. The activity will take set back and boundary development lines into account. The activity (UST installation) will occur to the west of the site. The car wash will be constructed to the south of the site and the buildings will be constructed to the east of site. Refer to Appendix B.

(b) Please provide a location map (see below) as Appendix A to this report which shows the location of the property and the

location of the activity on the property; as well as a site map (see below) as Appendix B to this report; and if applicable all alternative properties and locations.

Locality map Included in Appendix A:

The scale of the locality map must be at least 1:50 000. For linear activities of more than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g. 1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated on the map. The map must indicate the following: • an accurate indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the alternative sites, if any; • road names or numbers of all the major roads as well as the roads that provide access to the site(s) • a north arrow; • a legend; • the prevailing wind direction (during November to April and during May to October); and • GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre

point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection).

Site Plan Included in Appendix B

Detailed site plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. The site plan must contain or conform to the following: • The detailed site plan must be at a scale preferably at a scale of 1:500 or at an appropriate scale. The

scale must be indicated on the plan. • The property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50m of the site must be indicated on

the site plan. • The current land use (not zoning) as well as the land use zoning of each of the adjoining properties must

be indicated on the site plan. • The position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site must be

indicated on the site plan. • Services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above or underground), water supply pipelines,

boreholes, sewage pipelines, storm water infrastructure and access roads that will form part of the development must be indicated on the site plan.

• Servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude must be indicated on the site plan. • Sensitive environmental elements within 100m of the site must be included on the site plan, including (but

not limited to): o Rivers. o Flood lines (i.e. 1:10, 1:50, year and 32 meter set back line from the banks of a river/stream). o Ridges. o Cultural and historical features. o Areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or infested with alien species).

• Whenever the slope of the site exceeds 1:10, then a contour map of the site must be submitted.

(c) For a linear activity, please also provide a description of the route.

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site. The co-ordinates must be in degrees, minutes and seconds. The minutes should

Latitude (S): Longitude (E):

10

be given to at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.

33o 48‘5 .39“ 18o 30‘14 .25“

(d) or: For linear activities: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): • Starting point of the activity o ‘ “ o ‘ “ • Middle point of the activity o ‘ “ o ‘ “ • End point of the activity o ‘ “ o ‘ “ Please Note: For linear activities that are longer than 500m, please provide and addendum with co-ordinates taken every 100 meters along the route. 5. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Included as Appendix C Colour photographs of the site and its surroundings (taken of the site and from the site) with a description of each photograph.

The vantage points from which the photographs were taken must be indicated on the site plan, or locality plan as applicable. If

available, please also provide a recent aerial photograph. Photographs must be attached as Appendix C to this report. It

should be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site. Date of photographs must be included.

Please note that the above requirements must be duplicated for all alternative sites.

11

SECTION B: DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT Site/Area Description For linear activities (pipelines, etc.) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary to complete copies of this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section B and indicate the area which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan. 1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE Indicate the general gradient of the sites (highlight the appropriate box).

Flat Flatter than 1:10 1:10 – 1:4 Steeper than 1:4 2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE (a) Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site (highlight the appropriate box(es).

Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley Plain

Undulating plain/low hills

Dune Sea-front

(b) Please provide a description of the location in the landscape. The site is located on flat land that has been previously disturbed through activities such as vegetation clearing, dumping and infestation of alien plants (see Photolog in Appendix C). The property is surrounded by vacant land to the immediate north, west and north- west of the site. High density residential properties exist to the south, east and south east of the site. There are limited ecological processes on site due to fragmentation of the landscape and the development of surrounding roads and houses.

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE (a) Is the site(s) located on or near any of the following (highlight the appropriate boxes)?

Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep) YES NO UNSURE Seasonally wet soils (often close to water bodies) YES NO UNSURE Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with loose soil YES NO UNSURE Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water) YES NO UNSURE Soils with high clay content YES NO UNSURE Any other unstable soil or geological feature YES NO UNSURE An area sensitive to erosion YES NO UNSURE An area adjacent to or above an aquifer. YES NO UNSURE An area within 100m of the source of surface water YES NO UNSURE According to the 1:500 000 Hydrogeological map series for the Republic of South Africa, 2000, the site is underlain by an Intergranular aquifer type, with a low yield of between 0.1 and 0.5 l/s. The water table on the site may be shallow during the winter months (May to August) when the area experiences high rainfall.

(b) If any of the answers to the above are “YES” or “unsure”, specialist input may be requested by the Department.

(Information in respect of the above will often be available at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by Geological Survey may also be used).

(c) Please indicate the type of geological formation underlying the site.

Granite Shale Sandstone Quartzite Dolomite Dolorite Other (describe)

Please provide a description. According to the 1: 250 000 Geology Map Series, the site is underlain by sedimentary and volcanic rocks, specifically the Springfontyn formation.

12

4. SURFACE WATER (a) Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites (highlight the appropriate boxes)?

Perennial River YES NO UNSURE

Non-Perennial River YES NO UNSURE

Permanent Wetland YES NO UNSURE

Seasonal Wetland YES NO UNSURE

Artificial Wetland YES NO UNSURE

Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland YES NO UNSURE

(b) Please provide a description. There are no surface water resources on or adjacent to the site.

5. BIODIVERSITY Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the biodiversity occurring on the site and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. To assist with the identification of the biodiversity occurring on site and the ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.org or [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GIS Unit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/ EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used. A map of the relevant biodiversity information (including an indication of the habitat conditions as per (b) below) and must be provided as an overlay map to the property/site plan as Appendix D to this report. (a) Highlight the applicable biodiversity planning categories of all areas on site and indicate the reason(s) provided in the

biodiversity plan for the selection of the specific area as part of the specific category).

Systematic Biodiversity Planning Category If CBA or ESA, indicate the reason(s) for its selection in biodiversity plan

Critical Biodiversity

Area (CBA)

Ecological Support

Area (ESA)

Other Natural

Area (ONA)

No Natural Area

Remaining (NNR)

According to the City of Cape Town’s Biodiversity Network (Holmes and Stipinovich, 2012), the eastern boundary of the site is classified as `transformed’ (see Figure 3 below) and holds no conservation importance in terms of natural vegetation or species i.e. it holds no value in terms of Ecological Support Areas. The remainder of the site is unclassified.

Figure 3: Zoomed-in Google Earth ™ aerial image of proposed Parklands service station area in relation to the City of Cape Town’s Biodiversity Network (yellow shading = transformed) (Holmes and Stipinovich, 2012).

http://bgis.sanbi.org/

mailto:[email protected]

13

(b) Highlight and describe the habitat condition on site.

Habitat Condition

Percentage of habitat condition class (adding up

to 100%)

Description and additional Comments and Observations (including additional insight into condition, e.g. poor land management

practises, presence of quarries, grazing/harvesting regimes etc).

Natural 15% There are indigenous plants scattered across the site. The indigenous species

observed on site are of low conservation importance (i.e. no threatened species were found on site).

Near Natural (includes areas with low

to moderate level of alien invasive plants)

%

Degraded (includes areas heavily invaded by alien plants)

85% Most of the vegetation cover on the site is made up of exotic grasses (see Figure 4) and other alien vegetation.

Transformed (includes cultivation,

dams, urban, plantation, roads, etc)

%

(c) Complete the table to indicate:

(i) the type of vegetation, including its ecosystem status, present on the site; and (ii) whether an aquatic ecosystem is present on site.

(d) Please provide a description of the vegetation type and/or aquatic ecosystem present on site, including any important

biodiversity features/information identified on site (e.g. threatened species and special habitats)

Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems

Ecosystem threat status as per the National Environmental

Management: Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004)

Critical Wetland (including rivers, depressions, channelled

and unchanneled wetlands, flats, seeps

pans, and artificial wetlands)

Estuary Coastline Endangered

Vulnerable

Least Threatened YES NO UNSURE YES NO YES NO

14

The site would have historically been covered by Cape Flats Sand Fynbos according to the Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho, and Swaziland (Mucina, Rutherford and Powrie, 2005). The vegetation unit is Critically Endangered and thus remnant patches are of high conservation importance. The site has, however, undergone high levels of disturbance, with the result that most of the site is covered with exotic species and a relatively low cover of weedy remnant or pioneer species. The indigenous species observed are, therefore, of low conservation importance (i.e. no threatened species found). The species found on site include Trachyandra sp.; Tetragonia fruticosa, Osteospermum moniliferum, Ficinia bulbosa, Senecio sp., Centella tridentata, Atriplex semibaccata, Senecio sp, Carpobrotus edulis, Cyperus longus, Trichocephalus stipularis, Typha capensis, Thesium sp., Hermannia cf. verticillata, Elegia tectorum (single individual) and Lobelia linearis. Most of the vegetation cover is made up of exotic grasses such as kikuyu grass (Pennisetum), common oat grass (Avena fatua), hairy wild lettuce (Hypochoeris radicata), Russian tumbleweed (Salsola kali), Tall fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) and kweekgras (Cynodon dactylon). The site is considered to have low restoration potential due to the high levels of transformation and its position within an isolated urban area surrounded by residential development.

Figure 4: Northern portion of the site showing degraded area dominated by grasses and coppicing Port Jackson Willow (source: Dave McDonald)

6. LAND USE OF THE SITE

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.

Untransformed area Low density residential

Medium density residential

High density residential Informal residential

Retail Commercial & warehousing Light industrial Medium industrial Heavy industrial

Power station Office/consulting room

Military or police base/station/compound

Casino/entertainment complex

Tourism & Hospitality facility

Open cast mine Underground mine Spoil heap or slimes dam Quarry, sand or

borrow pit Dam or reservoir

Hospital/medical center School Tertiary education facility Church Old age home

Sewage treatment plant Train station or shunting yard Railway line Major road (4 lanes or

more) Airport

Harbour Sport facilities Golf course Polo fields Service station

15

Landfill or waste treatment site Plantation Agriculture River, stream or wetland

Nature conservation area

Mountain, koppie or ridge Museum Historical building Graveyard Archeological site

Other land uses (describe):

(a) Please provide a description. The vacant (untransformed) site contains both natural and degraded habitats, with the majority of the site covered by alien plants as described above. Figure 5 below shows the vacant site.

Figure 5: Portion of the site showing the untransformed nature of the site looking south

7. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA (a) Highlight the current land uses and/or prominent features that occur within +/- 500m radius of the site and neighbouring

properties if these are located beyond 500m of the site. Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.

Untransformed area Low density residential

Medium density residential

High density residential

Informal residential

Retail Commercial & warehousing Light industrial Medium industrial Heavy industrial

Power station Office/consulting room

Military or police base/station/compound

Casino/entertainment complex

Tourism & Hospitality facility

Open cast mine Underground mine Spoil heap or slimes dam Quarry, sand or

borrow pit Dam or reservoir

Hospital/medical center School Tertiary education facility Church Old age home

Sewage treatment plant Train station or shunting yard Railway line Major road (4 lanes or

more) Airport

Harbour Sport facilities Golf course Polo fields Service station

Landfill or waste treatment site Plantation Agriculture River, stream or wetland

Nature conservation area

Mountain, koppie or ridge Museum Historical building Graveyard Archeological site

Other land uses (describe):

(b) Please provide a description, including the distance and direction to the nearest residential area and industrial area.

16

Vacant land (untransformed area) surrounding the site to the immediate north, northeast, west and north west. The site is located in the newly developed Parklands/ Sunningdale area. The property is surrounded by vacant land to the immediate north, west and north- west of the site. High density residential properties exist to the south, east and south east of the site (refer to Appendix A). The nearest industrial area is located approximately 3 km south east of the site. Parklands College (school) is located approximately 240 meters north from the boundary of the site. Checkers (and other retail stores) is located approximately 280 meters north west from the boundary of site (see Figure 9)

Figure 6: Location of the site in Parklands (source: Google Earth Pro)

Figure 7: Residential community located on the southern boundary of the site

Figure 8: Residential community located on the eastern boundary of the site

Shopping Centre and Checkers

Parklands College

17

Figure 9: Retail land use located to the north of the site.

8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS Describe the existing social and economic characteristics of the community in order to provide baseline information. The site falls within the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality and is located in Subcouncil 1, Blaauwberg District, Ward 107. Blaauwberg is a large district, covering 55,000 ha, and includes core urban areas as well as areas of agricultural land and conservation areas. While the District contains fast-growing new development areas (such as Parklands), other areas remain underdeveloped, low income areas (such as Du Noon). There is a stark contrast between the more affluent areas along the Atlantic Seaboard and some of the low-income, more informal areas, where access to infrastructure, services and economic opportunity is poor. The important industrial areas of Killarney Gardens, Montague Gardens and Paarden Eiland are also located in the Blaauwberg District. The population of the Blaauwberg District was estimated to be 152,299 in 2001 and 267,113 in 2008, showing an annual growth rate of 7.82, significantly higher than that of the other Districts in the City of Cape Town. This can be attributed to the new residential areas that have been developed in the District in recent years. The unemployment rate within the District is 22.1 present; however the unemployment figures differ quite significantly within the District, with areas such as Atlantis and Du Noon experiencing higher unemployment rates of over 50 present. Parklands is an extensive, privately owned development area located within the urban edge. The area offers a range of different land uses, including residential, industrial, mixed use as well as various public facilities and conservation areas. The area has attracted young families as well as those looking to downsize, due to the relative affordability of the housing in this area. The racial composition of Parklands comprises of 88.4 percent White, 5.2percent Coloured, 4 percent Africans and 2.2 percent Indian (http://census.adrianfrith.com/place/17133015). (Source: http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/sdf/Documents/Blaauwberg_Executive_Summary.pdf)

http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/sdf/Documents/Blaauwberg_Executive_Summary.pdf

18

9. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ASPECTS (a) Please be advised that if section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act No. 25 of 1999), is applicable to your

proposed development, then you are requested to furnish this Department with written comment from Heritage Western Cape as part of your public participation process. Section 38 of the Act states as follows: “38. (1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (7), (8) and (9), any person who intends to undertake a development categorised as-

(a) the construction of a road, wall, power line, pipeline, canal or other similar form of linear development or barrier exceeding 300m in length;

(b) the construction of a bridge or similar structure exceeding 50m in length; I any development or other activity which will change the character of a site- (i) exceeding 5 000 m2 in extent; or (ii) involving three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof; or (iii) involving three or more erven or divisions thereof which have been consolidated within the past five years; or (iv) the costs of which will exceed a sum set in terms of regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources

authority; (d) the re-zoning of a site exceeding 10 000 m2 in extent; or (e) any other category of development provided for in regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources

authority, must at the very earliest stages of initiating such a development, notify the responsible heritage resources authority and furnish it with details regarding the location, nature and extent of the proposed development.”

(b) The impact on any national estate referred to in section 3(2), excluding the national estate contemplated in section

3(2)(i)(vi) and (vii), of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act No. 25 of 1999), must also be investigated, assessed and evaluated. Section 3(2) states as follows: “3(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), the national estate may include—

(a) places, buildings, structures and equipment of cultural significance; (b) places to which oral traditions are attached or which are associated with living heritage; I historical settlements and townscapes; (d) landscapes and natural features of cultural significance; (e) geological sites of scientific or cultural importance; (f) archaeological and palaeontological sites; (g) graves and burial grounds, including— (i) ancestral graves; (ii) royal graves and graves of traditional leaders; (iii) graves of victims of conflict; (iv) graves of individuals designated by the Minister by notice in the Gazette; (v) historical graves and cemeteries; and (vi) other human remains which are not covered in terms of the Human Tissue Act, 1983 (Act No. 65 of 1983); (h) sites of significance relating to the history of slavery in South Africa; (i) movable objects, including— (i) objects recovered from the soil or waters of South Africa, including archaeological and palaeontological objects and material, meteorites and rare geological specimens; (ii) objects to which oral traditions are attached or which are associated with living heritage; (iii) ethnographic art and objects; (iv) military objects; (v) objects of decorative or fine art; (vi) objects of scientific or technological interest; and (vii) books, records, documents, photographic positives and negatives, graphic, film or video material or sound recordings, excluding those that are public records as defined in section 1(xiv) of the National Archives of South Africa Act, 1996 (Act No. 43 of 1996).”

Is section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, applicable to the development? YES NO

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain:

The proposed development triggers, Section 38(1)(C) Any development or activity that will change the character of a site-9 (i) exceeding 5 000m2 in extent of the National Heritage Resources Act. The size of the development is expected to be greater than 5000m2 and the character of the site will change from vacant to developed (service station). A notification of intent to develop (NID) was completed by a Heritage Specialist (Tim Hart of ACO). The NID was submitted to Heritage Western Cape on the 14 June 2012. Heritage Western Cape responded to the NID on the 25 July 2012 and made the decision that “no further studies are required” for the proposed development. Appendix J includes proof of this communication.

Will the development impact on any national estate referred to in section 3(2) of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999?

YES NO

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain:

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO UNCERTAIN

19

If YES, explain:

Please Note: If uncertain, the Department may request that specialist input be provided.

10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES

(a) Please list all legislation, policies and/or guidelines that have been considered in the preparation of this Basic Assessment

Report.

LEGISLATION ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY

TYPE Permit/ license/

authorisation/comment / relevant consideration (e.g. rezoning or

consent use, building plan approval)

DATE (if already obtained):

National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998 as amended.

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Authority This Application

EIA Regulations in Government Notice R544 Activity 13



Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Act (No. 85 of 1993)

Department of Labour Comment This Application

National Environmental Management: Waste Act No 59 of 2008

Department of Environmental Affairs


National Heritage Resources Act, Section 38 (1) (C) (i) Heritage Western Cape Authority 25 July 2012

POLICY/ GUIDELINES ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY

Guideline on Public Participation (August 2010) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Waste Minimization Guideline for Environmental Impact Assessment Reviews (May 2003)


Guidelines for Environmental Management Plans (June 2005) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on Need and Desirability (August 2010) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on Alternatives (August 2010) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on Public Participation (August 2010) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Waste Minimization Guideline for Environmental Impact Assessment Reviews (May 2003)


Guideline for Involving Biodiversity Specialists in EIA Processes (2005) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline for Determining the Scope of Specialist Involvement in EIA Processes


Guideline for Involving Heritage Specialists in EIA Processes Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists in EIA Processes Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

(b) Please describe how the legislation, policies and/or guidelines were taken into account in the preparation of this Basic

Assessment Report. LEGISLATION / POLICY / GUIDELINE DESCRIBE HOW THE LEGISLATION / POLICY / GUIDELINE WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT

(e.g. describe the extent to which it was adhered to, or deviated from, etc). National Environmental Management Act- Guideline on Public Participation

• 30 Day Public Registration Period was initiated in May 2012. • A Background Information Document (BID) was distributed to surrounding

landowners (within a 100m radius of the site) including Parklands College, and Shoprite Checkers to the north of the site. A copy of the BID is included in Appendix F.

• An advert was placed in TableTalk on Wednesday 30 May 2012 to inform the public of the commencement of the BA process at the Parklands site.

• Two site notices were placed on site to inform the public that an environmental impact assessment was taking place at the site.

• A poster was placed at Shoprite Checkers to inform the public of the commencement of the BA process at the Parklands site.

Proof of the above is included in Appendix F.

20

National Environmental Management Act- Guideline on Environmental Management Plans

The guideline on EMPs will be consulted and all relevant requirements of the guideline will be taken into account during the compilation of the EMP. Please see Appendix E for the EMP.

Occupational Health and Safety Act (No. 85 of 1993)

All on site employees, contractors and subcontractors will adhere to the conditions stipulated in the OHS Act. Occupational Health and Safety has been considered throughout this application and has been focused on in the Impacts Section (Section F). The Act and its implications are mentioned in the following impacts: Noise, Dust as well as Access and Safety.

National Environmental Management: Waste Act No 59 of 2008

Waste will be produced during the construction and operation phase. Neither the type of the waste or quantities to be produced triggers the Waste Act, although the Waste Act has been taken into account in this process. Concrete and building rubble will be disposed of at an authorized landfill site. All waste removal will be undertaken by a licensed waste removal contractor. Waste produced during the operational phase including general office waste, waste water from the car wash as well as used oil from the on site restaurant will be removed by appropriate contractors as explained in Section F2.

Guideline on Need and Desirability (August 2010)

The need and desirability of the project has been explained using this framework. See Section D.

Provincial Road Access Guidelines (September 2002)

The current layout shows a left-out and right-out exit from the service station on to Wood Drive. Due to the width of Wood Drive (less than 120 m), such an exit is not permissible according to the Provincial Roads Access Guidelines 2002. As such Shell will update the layout to reflect a left-out only exit onto Wood Drive. A traffic circle is therefore proposed for the Wood Drive , Thetford intersection to allow vehicles to safely make a U-turn and return to Sandown Rd.

Please note: Copies of any permit(s) or licences received from any other organ of state must be attached this report as Appendix E.

21

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

The public participation process must fulfil the requirements outlined in NEMA, the EIA Regulations, and if applicable the NEM:

WA and/or the NEM: AQA. This Department’s Guideline on Public Participation (August 2010) and Guideline on Exemption

Applications (August 2010), both of which are available on the Department’s website (http://www.capegateway.gov.za/eadp),

must also be taken into account.

Please highlight the appropriate box to indicate whether the specific requirement was undertaken or whether there was a

deviation that was agreed to by the Department.

1. Were all potential interested and affected parties notified of the application by –

(a) fixing a notice board at a place conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of -

(i) the site where the activity to which the application relates is to be undertaken; and YES DEVIATED

(ii) any alternative site mentioned in the application; N/A YES DEVIATED

(b) giving written notice to – (i) the owner or person in control of that land if the applicant is not the owner or person in control of the land; YES N/A

(ii) the occupiers of the site where the activity is to be undertaken and to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken; N/A The site is currently vacant and there are no occupiers of the site.

YES DEVIATED

(iii) owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is to be undertaken and to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken; YES DEVIATED

(iv) the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site and alternative site is situated and any organisation of ratepayers that represent the community in the area; YES DEVIATED

(v) the municipality which has jurisdiction in the area; YES DEVIATED

(vi) any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity; and YES DEVIATED

(vii) any other party as required by the competent authority; YES DEVIATED

I placing an advertisement in -

(i) one* local newspaper; and YES DEVIATED (ii) any official Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing public

notice of applications or other submissions made in terms of these Regulations; YE S DEVIATED

N/A

(d) placing an advertisement in at least one* provincial newspaper or national newspaper, if the activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the boundaries of the metropolitan or local municipality in which it is or will be undertaken.

YE S DEVIATED

N/A

* Please note: In terms of the NEM: WA and NEM: AQA a notice must be placed in at least two newspapers circulating in the

area in which the activity applied for is to be carried out. Proof of the above is included in Appendix F.

2. Provide a list of all the state departments that were consulted:

DEA&DP’s Pollution and Waste Directorate City of Cape Town (Traffic, Solid Waste, Environmental) Ward Councilor Department of Water Affairs Heritage Western Cape Cape Nature Subcouncil Manager


22

Please note:

Should any of the responses be “No” and no deviation or exemption from that requirement was

requested and agreed to /granted by the Department, the Basic Assessment Report will be rejected.

A list of all the potential interested and affected parties, including the organs of State, notified and a list

of all the register of interested and affected parties, must be submitted with the final Basic Assessment

Report. The list of registered interested and affected parties must be opened, maintained and made

available to any person requesting access to the register in writing.

The draft Basic Assessment Report must be submitted to the Department before it is made available to

interested and affected parties, including the relevant organs of State and State departments which

have jurisdiction with regard to any aspect of the activity, for a 40-day commenting period. With regard

to State departments, the 40-day period commences the day after the date on which the Department

as the competent/licensing authority requests such State department in writing to submit comment. The

applicant/EAP is therefore required to inform this Department in writing when the draft Basic Assessment

Report will be made available to the relevant State departments for comment. Upon receipt of the Draft

Basic Assessment Report and this confirmation, this Department will in accordance with Section 24O(2)

and (3) of the NEMA request the relevant State departments to comment on the draft report within 40

days.

All comments of interested and affected parties on the draft Basic Assessment Report must be recorded,

responded to and included in the Comments and Responses Report included as Appendix F to the final

Basic Assessment Report. If necessary, any amendments in response to comments received must be

effected in the Basic Assessment Report itself. The Comments and Responses Report must also include a

description of the public participation process followed.

3. Please provide an overall summary of the Public Participation Process that was followed. (The detailed outcomes of this process must be included in a comments and response report to be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report (see note below) as Appendix F).

Initial Public Participation Process: • 30 Day Public Registration Period was initiated in May 2012. • A Background Information Document (BID) was distributed to surrounding landowners (within a 100m radius of the

site) including Parklands College, and Shoprite Checkers to the north of the site. A copy of the BID is included in Appendix F.

• An advert was placed in TableTalk on Wednesday 30 May 2012 to inform the public of the commencement of the BA process at the Parklands site.

• Two site notices were placed on site to inform the public that an environmental impact assessment was taking place at the site.

• A poster was placed at Shoprite Checkers to inform the public of the commencement of the BA process at the Parklands site.

Proof of the above is included in Appendix F.

40 Day Draft BAR Public Comment Period: • An advert will be placed in TableTalk advertising the availability of the Draft BAR as well as where the BAR can be

accessed. • Notification letters will be sent to all registered stakeholders and other identified stakeholders to inform them of the

availability of the Draft BAR. • A public meeting will be held approximately midway during the 40 day comment period. The public meeting will

allow stakeholders to voice their concerns, raise suggestions and receive further project information with the client being present. The date, time and venue will be advertised and notification will be sent to all stakeholders on the database.

Proof of the above will be included in the Final BAR.

23

The final Basic Assessment Report must be made available to registered interested and affected parties

for comment before submitting it to the Department for consideration. Unless otherwise indicated by the

Department, a final Basic Assessment Report must be made available to the registered interested and

affected parties for comment for a minimum of 21-days. Comments on the final Basic Assessment Report

does not have to be responded to, but the comments must be attached to the final Basic Assessment

Report.

The minutes of any meetings held by the EAP with interested and affected parties and other role players

which record the views of the participants must also be submitted as part of the public participation

information to be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix F.

Proof of all the notices given as indicated, as well as of notice to the interested and affected parties of

the availability of the draft Basic Assessment Report and final Basic Assessment Report must be submitted

as part of the public participation information to be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as

Appendix F.

24

SECTION D: NEED AND DESIRABILITY Please Note: Before completing this section, first consult this Department’s Guideline on Need and Desirability (August 2010) available on the Department’s website (http://www.capegateway.gov.za/eadp).

1. Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existing land use rights? YES NO Please explain The site is currently vacant and is zoned “undetermined”. The property will require rezoning to Business IV with concessional rights for a service station. The rezoning application will be undertaken by Francis Consultants. 2. Will the activity be in line with the following? (a) Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES NO Please explain Long term sustainability in development is the guiding principle underpinning the Western Cape PSDF. The proposed activity has taken the three pillars of Sustainable Development into account, namely, economic efficiency, social equity and ecological integrity. Economic Efficiency: The activity will create employment opportunities during the operation phase and provide economic security to the appointed construction company during the construction phase. Social Equity: The activity will adhere to Employment Equity requirements during both the construction and operational phase. Training opportunities will be presented where possible both phases. Ecological Integrity: According to the specialist study undertaken for this project, site has undergone high levels of disturbance and has a low ecological value. The development therefore will not destroy any ecology with a high conservation status. (b) Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES NO Please explain The site is within the Urban Edge in an area earmarked for mixed- use development. (c) Integrated Development Plan and Spatial Development Framework of the

Local Municipality (e.g. would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing approved and credible municipal IDP and SDF?).

YES NO Please explain

The site is within the Urban Edge, within an area earmarked for mixed-use development. The development will provide job opportunities within the more impoverished communities surrounding Parklands, such as Du Noon. (d) Approved Structure Plan of the Municipality YES NO Please explain The site is within the Urban Edge, within an area earmarked for mixed-use development and will not interfere with Structure Plan of the Municipality. (e) An Environmental Management Framework (EMF) adopted by the Department (e.g. Would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing environmental management priorities for the area and if so, can it be justified in terms of sustainability considerations?)


The site is located on vacant land that has been previously disturbed. Although the vegetation type that would have been found on the site is Cape Flats Sand Fynbos, which is considered Critically Endangered, the high levels of disturbance have resulted in the site being covered with exotic species and indigenous species observed are therefore of low conservation importance with limited potential for restoration. Due to the high level of development around the site, it is ecologically isolated and of little conservation value. (f) Any other Plans (e.g. Guide Plan) YES NO Please explain


25

3. Is the land use (associated with the activity being applied for) considered within the timeframe intended by the existing approved Spatial Development Framework (SDF) agreed to by the relevant environmental authority (i.e. is the proposed development in line with the projects and programmes identified as priorities within the credible IDP)?


The development falls within an area earmarked for mixed use within the high density residential area of Parklands. The land use (commercial) does not contradict the IDP or SDF. The land is currently not zoned and a rezoning application is currently underway. 4. Should development, or if applicable, expansion of the town/area concerned

in terms of this land use (associated with the activity being applied for) occur here at this point in time?


The development falls within an area ear marked for mixed use within the high density residential area of Parklands. The land use (commercial) does not contradict the IDP or SDF. The land is vacant and currently not zoned. A rezoning application is currently underway. The site is located within the recently established suburb of Parklands and there are four service stations within a three km radius of the site. The service station and additional services, will provide additional convenience to surrounding residents and commercial users. The vacant land is degraded and has no vegetation or species of conservation importance i.e. no sensitive biological receptors have been identified. 5. Does the community/area need the activity and the associated land use

concerned (is it a societal priority)? (This refers to the strategic as well as local level (e.g. development is a national priority, but within a specific local context it could be inappropriate.)


The development of a service station will provide convenience to Parklands residents. The nearest service station to the proposed site is 2 km to the west. There are four other service stations within a 3 km radius of the site. Within the Blaauwberg District, there are areas, such as Du Noon, that have unemployment rates as high as 50 percent and the development of the service station would create 40 to 45 employment opportunities during the operational phase. Of these employment opportunities, 75 percent will be available to previously disadvantaged South Africans and could be sourced from Du Noon, located less than 4 km south east of the site. 6. Are the necessary services with adequate capacity currently available (at the

time of application), or must additional capacity be created to cater for the development? (Confirmation by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix E.)


The site is currently vacant and not connected to any services. Confirmation that there is capacity for the site to be connected to services is being sought and will be attached to the Final BAR as Appendix E. 7. Is this development provided for in the infrastructure planning of the

municipality, and if not what will the implication be on the infrastructure planning of the municipality (priority and placement of services and opportunity costs)? (Comment by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix E.)


The Parklands area has been identified by the City of Cape Town as a growth node, and therefore, the delivery of infrastructure to this area has been taken into consideration by the Municipality. It is expected that the service station will create additional traffic along both Sandown Road and Wood Drive. The current infrastructure planning of the municipality should take this additional traffic into account during their infrastructure planning. It is understood that a traffic light will be installed at the four way intersection between Sandown Road and Wood Drive to manage the traffic flow resulting from the Checkers Shopping Complex, Parklands College and the proposed service station. 8. Is this project part of a national programme to address an issue of national

concern or importance? YES NO Please explain

The service station is being developed by Shell, a private company, as part of their business development. It will however, create employment opportunities which will address the national concern of unemployment.

26

9. Do location factors favour this land use (associated with the activity applied for) at this place? (This relates to the contextualisation of the proposed land use on this site within its broader context.)


The site is located within the Urban Edge at the intersection between two major roads in Parklands, namely Sandown Road and Wood Drive. The traffic count and lack of other service stations in the area indicate that a service station would be appropriate at the site. The service station can be accessed from both Sandown Road and Wood Drive thus allowing high levels of commuter attraction. The service station will be able to conveniently service the needs of the surrounding residential community and commercial community including Checkers and Parklands College. 10. How will the activity or the land use associated with the activity applied for,

impact on sensitive natural and cultural areas (built and rural/natural environment)?


According to the Notification of Intent to Develop (NID) submitted to Heritage Western Cape, the area is free of any heritage resources of value and there is a very low possibility of archaeological or paleontological material on the site. The botanical assessment has shown that the study area has undergone high levels of disturbance, with the result that most of the site is covered with exotic species and a relatively low cover of weedy remnant or pioneer species. The indigenous species observed are therefore of low conservation importance (i.e. no threatened species found).

11. How will the development impact on people’s health and wellbeing (e.g. in terms of noise, odours, visual character and sense of place, etc)? YES NO Please explain

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) that may be emitted by the fuels stored on site are potentially hazardous to human health in large amounts. However, only small amounts of VOCs are anticipated during the filling of USTs, from the breather pipes or minor spills during the dispensing of fuel. The safety of staff, customers and neighbouring landowners may be compromised as a result of an accidental fire or explosion at the service station. The potential impact on of people’s health and well being is discussed in further detail in Section E. There will be increased noise levels during the construction phase due to site clearing activities, the movement of construction vehicles and other related activities. During the operational phase, there is expected to be higher noise levels due to increased traffic activity. This may be considered a nuisance factor to the surrounding residential community. The residential character (sense of place) of the immediate area could potentially be altered by the proposed service station and associated development. The area is however becoming urbanised and there are other commercial facilities within the vicinity of the site, such as the shopping centre north of the site The views of the adjacent residences could be affected depending on the height and siting of the proposed service station and the forecourt canopy. There will be an increase in the amount of light emanating from the proposed service station, particularly if it operates for 24 hours. 12. Will the proposed activity or the land use associated with the activity applied

for, result in unacceptable opportunity costs? YES NO Please explain

The potential impacts on the people’s wellbeing can be mitigated through the implementation of an operational phase EMP. It is not anticipated that the potential negative impacts associated with the Project will result in unacceptable impacts to people’s wellbeing or the surrounding environment. The activity will create employment opportunities for the residents within the Blaauwberg District, where, in certain areas, unemployment is very high. 13. What will the cumulative impacts (positive and negative) of the proposed

land use associated with the activity applied for, be? YES NO Please explain

At present, there are four service stations within a three km radius of the site, and one within one km of the site. Potential Soil/Groundwater Contamination: Although there are four petrol service stations in the area in total, within a three km radius from the site, the likelihood of any contaminants spreading from the site to other potentially contaminated land is low and vice versa. Each service station will have in place leak detection measures and spill response plans in place to limit and avoid soil and groundwater contamination. Noise Impacts during Construction: This will be determined by other construction activities taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage it is unclear what other construction activities may be taking place in the area in the second half of 2013. Traffic impacts throughout the life cycle of the development: It is expected that the cumulative impact associated with the increase in traffic related to the development will be negligible as the service station captures the existing traffic flow rather than creating additional traffic flow. However, the add-on services (such as the convenience store) is expected to deviate a small number of customers from their original route i.e. 25% of all trips to the convenience store will be by customers who usually take a different route but then decided to alter their route to go to the convenience store. Induced Economic Benefits: Forty five employment opportunities will be created during the operation phase, bringing additional income into households. The increase in disposable income available to households will result in increased demand for goods and services and greater spending within the Du Noon local community.

27

(17) Please describe how the general objectives of Integrated Environmental Management as set out in section 23 of NEMA have been taken into account: A holistic, integrated environmental approach has been taken, during the compilation of the report which includes: • Adequate consideration of the effects of the activity on the environment. • Procedures for the investigation, assessment and communication of the potential impact of activities were followed. • An adequate public participation process was followed which included informing neighbouring landowners. • Actual and potential impacts on the environment, socio-economic conditions and cultural heritage have been assessed

and associated mitigation measures has been outlined in this Basic Assessment report. These mitigation measures enhance benefits of the project, and decrease negative impacts of the project.

• Other objectives of IEM that have been taken into account include the consideration of risk, consequences and alternatives.

• (18) Please describe how the principles of environmental management as set out in section 2 of NEMA have been taken into account: Environmental resources must serve public interest The needs of people have been considered throughout the application process. The land is currently vacant and has not been zoned. It was reported by a neighbour that people were using the land for undesirable activity. The development of the land would eliminate the potential for this. The service station and associated convenience store will provide extra convenience to the surrounding community.

Sustainable development Integration of environmental, social and economic components has been taken into account when drafting this report and assessing the impacts. Additionally, energy saving technology such as low flush toilets and energy saving lighting will be installed during the construction of the service station.

Pollution and degradation of the environment The mitigation measures that have been recommended will assist to prevent, minimise or remedy pollution and degradation of the environment. Shell has a strict environmental management policy which will be implemented during the construction and operational phases of the development. Applicable mitigation measures and standards have been included in the EMP (see Appendix H). Non-renewable resources must be used responsibly Non- renewable resources such as electricity will be used in a responsible manner and used only when it is needed. Energy and water saving technology will be used during the operational phase of the development. Additionally, low water consumption plants will be planted during the construction phase. Environmental management must be integrated An integrated environmental approach has been applied throughout the compilation of this BAR. This BAR assesses the potential positive and negative impacts of the project, on the biophysical environment as well as the socio-economic environment.

14. Is the development the best practicable environmental option for this

land/site? YES NO Please explain

The site is considered to have low restoration potential due to the high levels of transformation and isolated position within an urban area. The site is degraded and of little conservation value. The site is surrounded by residential and commercial property and well suited to development. 15. What will the benefits be to society in general and to the local communities? Please explain The activity will create employment opportunities for the residents within the Blaauwberg District, where, in certain areas such as Du Noon, unemployment is very high. It is expected that 40- 45 people will be employed during the operational phase of the development, with approximately 75 percent of the employment positions being made available to previously disadvantaged South Africans. The service station will also provide convenience to the surrounding residential and commercial community, who will be able to utilise it for purchasing fuel, food and other goods from the convenience store that will be located on site. . 16. Any other need and desirability considerations related to the proposed activity? Please explain The development of a service station at the site will provide a convenience for motorists in the area needing to refuel. In addition, the add-on services, such as a convenience store and fast food restaurant will provide goods and services to the public.

28

SECTION E: ALTERNATIVES Please Note: Before completing this section, first consult this Department’s Guideline on Alternatives (August 2010) available on the Department’s website (http://www.capegateway.gov.za/eadp). “Alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purposes and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to –

(a) the property on which, or location where, it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; I the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity.

The NEMA prescribes that the procedures for the investigation, assessment and communication of the potential consequences or impacts of activities on the environment must, inter alia, with respect to every application for environmental authorisation –

• ensure that the general objectives of integrated environmental management laid down in NEMA and the National Environmental Management Principles set out in NEMA are taken into account; and

• include an investigation of the potential consequences or impacts of the alternatives to the activity on the environment and assessment of the significance of those potential consequences or impacts, including the option of not implementing the activity.

The general objective of integrated environmental management is, inter alia, to “identify, predict and evaluate the actual and potential impact on the environment, socio-economic conditions and cultural heritage, the risks and consequences and alternatives and options for mitigation of activities, with a view to minimising negative impacts, maximising benefits, and promoting compliance with the principles of environmental management” set out in NEMA. 1. In the sections below, please provide a description of any indentified and considered alternatives and alternatives that

were found to be feasible and reasonable. Please note: Detailed written proof the investigation of alternatives must be provided and motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist.

(a) Property and location/site alternatives to avoid negative impacts, mitigate unavoidable negative impacts and maximise

positive impacts, or detailed motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist: Shell identified the Parklands site through an internal site selection process, which included a feasibility study, a screening for obvious environmental red-flags and traffic count to confirm the commercial viability of a service station at the site. Shell has screened out a number of other potential site alternatives through this process and therefore, no site alternatives have been considered in this BAR. The proposed site is considered feasible and reasonable for the following reasons: • the site is disturbed and degraded, with scattered alien vegetation on the site; • the service station is commercially feasible; • the service station will improve the levels of convenience to surrounding residents and commercial areas; • the site is surrounded by commercial land uses to the north, and residential land uses to the south, and is thus a suitable

location to cater for commercial and residential land uses; and • the site is easily accessible off Sandown Road. (b) Activity alternatives to avoid negative impacts, mitigate unavoidable negative impacts and maximise positive impacts, or detailed motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist:

The sale of fuel is the core of Shell’s business and considering alternative activities for the site would be inconsistent with this objective. The storage of fuel for dispensing is in any event governed by SANS 10089-3 and the operation of the USTs at the Parklands site will conform to these standards. Therefore, no activity alternatives have been considered in this BAR. (c) Design or layout alternatives to avoid negative impacts, mitigate unavoidable negative impacts and maximise positive

impacts, or detailed motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist:


29

Two design layouts are being considered in this BAR, see Appendix B for layout diagrams. Alternative 1 (preferred alternative): The layout of Alternative 1 has the convenience store and other add-on services situated in the north east portion of the site, while the south east corner will remain vacant for future use. Therefore the main activities associated with the service station will be located further away from the residential areas adjacent to the south and a portion of the east border of the site. The bulk fuel delivery vehicles will not pass as close to the east boundary of the site in Alternative 1 as they would in Alternative 2. From a customer attraction perspective, Alternative 1 provides greater visibility from both Sandown Road and Wood Drive. Customers off Sandown Road would have better access to the service station. However, customers from Wood Drive have a further travelling distance to reach the forecourt.

N

30

Alternative 2: The layout of Alternative 2 has the convenience store and other add-on services situated in the south east portion of the site, while the north east corner will remain vacant for future use. Therefore the main activities associated with the service station will be located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and a portion of the east border of the site. The bulk fuel delivery vehicles will be closer to the east boundary when delivering fuel. From a customer attraction perspective, Alternative 2 provides for poor visibility for traffic travelling in a Northerly direction on Sandown Road. Alternative 2 provides good access for customers on Wood Drive but customers off Sandown Road would have a longer distance to drive to access the forecourt.

Both alternatives have been designed so as to minimize negative environmental and social impacts and maximise positive impacts. For example, the USTs are located away from the residential area in both design alternatives. The botanical study revealed that there are no sensitive biological receptors as the site is heavily degraded. Thus the design alternatives did not need to be adjusted to avoid any such receptors. . (d) Technology alternatives (e.g. to reduce resource demand and resource use efficiency) to avoid negative impacts, mitigate unavoidable negative impacts and maximise positive impacts, or detailed motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist: No technology alternatives are being considered in this BAR. The storage of fuel for dispensing is governed by SANS 10089-3 and the installation of the USTs at the Parklands site will conform to these standards. (e) Operational alternatives to avoid negative impacts, mitigate unavoidable negative impacts and maximise positive impacts, or detailed motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist: No operational alternatives are being considered in this BAR. The storage of fuel for dispensing is governed by SANS 10089-3 and the operation of the USTs at the Parklands site will conform to these standards.

N

31

(f) the option of not implementing the activity (the No-Go Option): The No- Go alternative is the option of not implementing the activity, to leave the site as is. In this option the service station would not be constructed, and the 4 X 46m3 USTs for the storage of fuel would not be installed. If the No- Go alternative is implemented, the following potential negative impacts would not occur: • increase in traffic; • potential soil and groundwater contamination; • air quality and dust; • loss of vegetation; • occupational health and safety; • employment opportunities; • possible decrease in surrounding property values; • noise impacts; and • visual impacts.

However, not implementing the activity would also result in no employment opportunities being created for local residents of Du Noon, and therefore no secondary flow of money within the community. The site will remain vacant and may attract unwanted social nuisances. (g) Other alternatives to avoid negative impacts, mitigate unavoidable negative impacts and maximise positive impacts, or detailed motivation if no reasonable or feasible alternatives exist: Not Applicable (h) Please provide a summary of the alternatives investigated and the outcomes of such investigation: Please note: If no feasible and reasonable alternatives exist, the description and proof of the investigation of alternatives, together with motivation of why no feasible or reasonable alternatives exist, must be provided. Given the nature of the storage of and dispensing of fuel, no technology or activity alternatives have been considered in this BAR. Shell identified the Parklands site through an internal site selection process, which included a feasibility study, a screening for obvious environmental red-flags and traffic count to confirm the commercial viability of a service station at the site. Shell has screened out a number of other potential site alternatives through this process and therefore, no site alternatives have been considered in this BAR. Two design layouts are being considered in this BAR and Layout Alternative 1 is the preferred alternative. The botanical study revealed that there are no sensitive biological receptors as the site is heavily degraded. Thus the design alternatives did not need to be adjusted to avoid any such receptors. Alternative 1 indicates that the dispenser islands, convenience store and other add-on services will be located further from the south and east borders of the site, essentially increasing the distance between the residential area (located to the east and south of the site), and the main areas of activity during the service station operations. In addition, the Shell bulk delivery vehicles will not pass as close to the east boundary. Therefore, the noise levels associated with Alternative 1 are likely to have a less significant impact on the surrounding landowners.

32

SECTION F: IMPACT ASSESSMENT, MANAGEMENT, MITIGATION AND MONITORING MEASURES Please note: The information in this section must be duplicated for all the feasible and reasonable alternatives (where relevant). 1. PLEASE DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT WILL IMPACT ON THE FOLLOWING

ASPECTS: (a) Geographical and physical aspects: Potential Soil and/ or Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2) There is potential for soil and/ or groundwater contamination during the construction and operation phases, as a result of accidental spills or leaks. A spill or leak is seen as a chance event, and the impact that would arise as a result is not seen as an impact that occurs under normal operating procedures. Construction Phase: • During construction, activities such as cement mixing, if not managed properly, could leach contaminants into the soil or

groundwater. • Construction machinery used on site may leak contaminants such as fuel or lubricants into the soil or groundwater. Operational Phase: • During the operation phase a subsurface, accidental spill or leak may occur as a result of tank failure or a leak in a

pipeline, which would lead to contamination of soil and/ or groundwater. The level of contamination would depend on the volume of fuel leaked/ spilt.

• Minor spills may occur on the forecourt when the USTs are being refuelled by the bulk delivery vehicle or during the dispensing of fuel from the pumps.

Decommissioning Phase: • During the decommissioning, there is the potential for soil and/ or groundwater contamination if the USTs and associated

infrastructure are not decommissioned by a qualified professional and removed from site.

Potential Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1 and 2) There is potential for the air quality to be impacted through the construction activities and during operation. Construction Phase: • Construction activities such as vegetation clearance, earthworks and increase vehicle traffic on site may generate dust

during the construction phase. Dust generated during the construction phase may cause discomfort to contractors and pose a nuisance to surrounding land users and occupiers. This increase in dust levels will be temporary in nature.

• Construction vehicles and equipment on site will emit exhaust fumes, increasing the emissions level in the area, although this will also be temporary in nature.

Operational Phase: • During the operation phase, small amounts of VOCs may be released when fuel is being transferred from the bulk delivery

vehicle to the USTs, or when fuel is being dispensed from the USTs. The VOCs will be dispersed by air movement. • The increase in vehicle traffic on the site will cause an increase in the emission of exhaust fumes. Decommissioning Phase: • Decommissioning activities such as earthworks and demolition may generate dust. This impact would be temporary in

nature, for the duration of the decommissioning. • VOCs released from the USTs during decommissioning will be minimal due to the process of tank isolation, whereby a

soapy substance is added into the tank to dissolve the remaining hydrocarbons, ensuring the vapours released are of a low concentration.

Health and Safety Risks (Alternative 1 and 2) There is a health and safety risk associated with construction and operational activities. Construction Phase: • During the construction phase, open excavations, vehicle movement and other construction activities may pose a health

and safety hazard to construction workers. Operation Phase: • Petroleum and diesel fuel are considered dangerous substances as they are volatile and could potentially ignite under

specific circumstances. Therefore, there is a risk of fire or explosions on site, which would pose a threat to on site employees and surrounding land users.

33

Noise Impact (Alternative 1 and 2) Construction and operation activities may cause an increase in noise levels which may be a nuisance to surrounding land users. Construction • Construction vehicles and other construction machinery will increase the noise levels during working hours. • The noise generated during this phase will be sporadic and temporary in nature. Operation • During operation, the noises that may be associated with the service station may include music broadcast over speakers

in the forecourt, staff talking amongst one another, and vehicles revving as they leave the service station. Decommissioning Phase: • Noise associated with the decommissioning phase will be similar to that of construction, i.e. noise from machinery

associated with decommissioning activities.

(b) Biological aspects: (Alternative 1 and 2) Will the development have an impact on critical biodiversity areas (CBAs) or ecological support areas (CSAs)? YES NO

If yes, please describe: According to the City of Cape Town’s Biodiversity Network the eastern side of the site is categorized as transformed and holds no conservation importance in terms of natural vegetation or species. Will the development have on terrestrial vegetation, or aquatic ecosystems ( wetlands, estuaries or the coastline)? YES NO

If yes, please describe: The installation of USTs and the development of a service station will result in vegetation loss on site. However, the site has been previously disturbed and is degraded. As stated above, the site does not have any conservation value. During operation, landscaping with indigenous plants will reintroduce plant species. Will the development have an impact on any populations of threatened plant or animal species, and/or on any habitat that may contain a unique signature of plant or animal species? YES NO

If yes, please describe: Please describe the manner in which any other biological aspects will be impacted: N/A (c) Socio-Economic aspects: (Alternative 1 and 2) What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? R 15 million What is the expected yearly income or contribution to the economy that will be generated by or as a result of the activity?

R 100 million

Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES NO How many new employment opportunities will be created in the construction phase of the activity? It is anticipated that the contractor will use existing employees thus creating increased job security for existing employees.

0

What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the construction phase?

Unknown at this stage

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown at this stage; however the construction tender will prescribe specific BEE requirements that must be fulfilled.

%

How will this be ensured and monitored (please explain): The construction tender document will prescribe specific BEE requirements that must be fulfilled.. How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity?

45

What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years?

Unknown at this stage.

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? 75 %

How will this be ensured and monitored (please explain): This will included as part of the operational tender requirements and it will be aligned with Shells BEE requirements. Any other information related to the manner in which the socio-economic aspects will be impacted:

34

During the construction phase, there will be an increase in noise as a result of construction activities, which will result in a temporary nuisance and, therefore, a negative impact on quality of life. The service station will affect the sense of place for neighbouring residential users as the land is currently vacant. Additionally, the service station may attract more vehicles into the area, increasing the traffic in the area. (d) Cultural and historic aspects: (Alternative 1 and 2) The area was farmland until the late 20th century and has been recently enclosed by the suburb of Parklands. No environmental elements can be deemed a heritage resource as there are very low possibilities of archaeological and paleontological resources within the area or site. In response to the NID submitted on the 14 June 2012, Heritage Western Cape stated that “no further studies are required”. Please see Appendix G. 2. WASTE AND EMISSIONS (a) Waste (including effluent) management (Alternative 1 and 2) YES NO If yes, indicate the types of waste (actual type of waste, e.g. oil, and whether hazardous or not) and estimated quantity per type? M3

Hazardous Waste: Concrete (containing cement) 5m3 Non- Hazardous Waste: construction rubble 10 m3 Non- Hazardous Waste: off cuts and scrap metal 2 m3 Will the activity produce waste during its operational phase? YES NO If yes, indicate the types of waste (actual type of waste, e.g. oil, and whether hazardous or not) and estimated quantity per type? Hazardous Waste: • Hazardous waste may be produced during emergency situations only, such as an accidental spill.

Such spills will be cleaned up with an absorbent material, and that material will then be considered hazardous waste.

Non- Hazardous Waste • General waste, including office waste (1m3) • Cooking oil from the on site restaurant (0.5m3). • Waste water from the oil/water separator originating from the on-site car wash (3m3 per day).

4.5M3

Where and how will the waste be treated / disposed of (describe)? If yes, indicate the types of waste (actual type of waste, e.g. oil, and whether hazardous or not) and estimated quantity per type per phase of the development? • Hazardous waste material resulting from emergency situations will be removed by an appropriate hazardous waste

contractor and will be disposed of at a registered hazardous landfill site. Proof of appropriate disposal must be obtained by the Contractor.

• General waste will be collected by the Municipality once a week. • Cooking oil will be removed from site by a licenced contractor. • There will be an oil/water separator on site, and water from the forecourt will be directed into it. Once water has been

through the oil/water separator, it will be released into the City’s sewage system. The oil/water separators are inspected regularly by Shell and an external waste company to ensure that they are functioning correctly. The water released from the separator is also monitored to ensure that is it suitable to be released into the sewage system.

Has the municipality or relevant authority confirmed that sufficient capacity exists for treating / disposing of the waste to be generated by this activity(ies)? If yes, provide written confirmation from Municipality or relevant authority. Confirmation of capacity is currently being sought and will be included in the Final BAR.

YES NO

Will the activity produce waste that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility other than into a municipal waste stream? YES NO

If yes, has this facility confirmed that sufficient capacity exist for treating / disposing of the waste to be generated by this activity(ies)? Provide written confirmation from the facility and provide the following particulars of the facility: Confirmation of capacity with the City of Cape Town Municipality currently being sought for general waste and will be included in the Final BAR. Hazardous waste will be removed by a licensed contractor, who will have an existing contract with a licensed landfill site, confirming capacity.

YES NO

35

Does the facility have an operating license? (If yes, please attach a copy of the license.) YES NO

Facility name: Contact person: Postal address: Postal code: Telephone: Cell: E-mail: Fax: Describe the measures that will be taken to reduce, reuse or recycle waste: Paper, plastics and cans will be separated from the general waste stream and collected for recycling. (b) Emissions into the atmosphere Will the activity produce emissions that will be disposed of into the atmosphere? YES NO If yes, does it require approval in terms of relevant legislation? YES NO Describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration and how it will be treated/mitigated: The major source of air emissions result from the following sources: The emissions likely to occur during the operation phase are listed below. • VOCs may be emitted when fuel is being transferred from the bulk delivery vehicle to the USTs, or when fuel is being

dispensed from the USTs. • Exhaust fumes will be emitted from the vehicles using the service station. • VOCs will be emitted from the UST ventilation pipes. The quantity of emissions to be released is expected to be minimal and will be dispersed into the atmosphere. 3. WATER USE Please indicate the source(s) of water for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es) (Alternative 1 and 2)

Municipal Water board Groundwater River, Stream, Dam or Lake Other The activity will not use water

If water is to be extracted from a groundwater source, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month: m3 Please provide proof of assurance of water supply (eg. Letter of confirmation from municipality / water user associations, yield of borehole) Does the activity require a water use permit / license from DWAF? YES NO If yes, please submit the necessary application to Department of Water Affairs and attach proof thereof to this application. Describe the measures that will be taken to reduce water demand, and measures to reuse or recycle water:

4. POWER SUPPLY Please indicate the source of power supply eg. Municipality / Eskom / Renewable energy source (Alternative 1 and 2) Power will be supplied by the City of Cape Town. If power supply is not available, where will power be sourced from? 5. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient:

• Outdoor lighting will be downward facing and low wattage. • Lights used for non-security purposes will be energy efficient for example compact fluorescent lights (CFL) or LED lights. • Energy efficient heaters and air conditioners will be used in the convenience store and fast food restaurant. • Hot water geysers will be insulated to prevent energy loss.

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any:

• Outdoor lighting will be downward facing and low wattage. • Lights used for non-security purposes will be energy efficient for example compact fluorescent lights (CFL) or LED lights. • Energy efficient heaters and air conditioners will be used in the convenience store and fast food restaurant. • Hot water geysers will be insulated to prevent energy loss.

37

6. DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS PRIOR TO AND AFTER MITIGATION

Please note: While sections are provided for impacts on certain aspects of the environment and certain impacts, the sections should also be copied and completed for all other impacts.

(a) Impacts that may result from the planning, design and construction phase (briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the planning, design and construction phase.

Potential impacts on geographical and physical aspects:

Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

There is potential for soil and/ or groundwater contamination during the construction phase, as a result of accidental spills or leaks, resulting in product seeping into the ground and potentially moving in to the groundwater.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, typically limited to site or immediate surrounds Long-term

Probability of occurrence: Unlikely

Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High, remediation of contaminated soil is possible, either through the removal of the soil or in-situ bio-remediation.

Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation:

Low, although there are four service stations within a three km radius from the site, the likelihood of any contaminants spreading from the site to other potentially contaminated land is low. Furthermore, there are no other known potential sources of contamination in the immediate vicinity of the site, and the nearest industrial area is over 3 km from the site.

Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium

Degree to which the impact can be mitigated: High

Proposed mitigation:

• The forecourt must have an impervious surface, such that fuel and oil products will not leak into the soil or groundwater below the forecourt.

• The USTs must have a secondary containment area to prevent subsurface leaks from seeping straight into the ground.

• An appropriate storm water management system must be included in the final site layout.

• The design must ensure that all runoff from the forecourt is directed into the storm water management system, which must include an oil/water separator.

• The buildings will comply with the National Building Regulations and Standards Act No. 103 of 1977.

• All pipework will be double walled and comply with SANS 62- 1 and 2, SANS 1132 (pipework).

• All fire extinguishers must comply with SANS 1151 (Portable rechargeable fire extinguishers).

• The UST installation must comply with SANS 10089 part 1 (storage of dangerous goods in USTs);

• All construction vehicles will be properly maintained to prevent leaks.

• Cement mixing must be confined to a designated area and must be done on an impervious surface.

• Any fuel stored on site must be kept in a bunded containment area.

• Drip trays are to be utilised during daily greasing and re-fuelling of machinery and to catch incidental spills and pollutants.

• Drip trays are to be inspected on a weekly basis for leaks and effectiveness, and emptied when necessary. This is to be closely monitored during rain events to prevent overflow.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Negligible Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low


Increased Traffic Levels (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: Heavy vehicles delivering material can cause slight delays in existing traffic operations due to their slow and careful moving nature. Smoke, dust and noise pollution may also be caused by these

38

vehicles. The current layout shows a left-out and right-out exit from the service station on to Wood Drive. Due to the width of Wood Drive (less than 120 m), such an exit is not permissible according to the Provincial Roads Access Guidelines 2002. As such Shell will update the layout to reflect a left-out only exit onto Wood Drive. A traffic circle is therefore proposed for the Wood Drive Thetford intersection to allow vehicles to safely make a U-turn and return to Sandown Rd.

Extent and duration of impact: Local – limited to immediate adjacent road network Short term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Negligible

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Negligible Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Degree to which the impact can be mitigated: Medium


• The final design layout must take into consideration recommendations made by the Traffic Specialists, including a left-in, left out access only on Wood Drive, to ensure compliance with the Provincial Roads Access Guidelines 2002.

• Co-ordination of movement of vehicles on and off site to reduce risks and prevent congestion on roads in the vicinity of the site.

• No vehicles or machinery should be serviced or refuelled onsite. • Peak traffic hours should be avoided. • Large vehicle turning must take place onsite and not in the

adjacent roads. In cases where activities may obstruct traffic, local traffic officials must be contacted.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Negligible Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Negligible


Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1)

Nature of impact:

There is potential for the air quality to be impacted through the construction activities that may generate dust through exposing soil and disturbing the ground. Fugitive dust can be considered a nuisance factor for surrounding land users and occupiers. Construction vehicles will emit exhaust fumes while in use. Alternative 1 is located further from the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore reducing the potential for fugitive dust to cause a nuisance for surrounding landowners south and east of the site. Exhaust emissions produced by construction equipment will be dispersed and it is not anticipated that they will cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to the site and immediate surrounds Short- term



Low, however, this will be determined by other construction activities that may produce dust taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage it is unclear what other construction activities may be taking place in the area in the second half of 2013.




• Dust suppression methods, such as wetting or laying straw, should be applied where there are large tracts of exposed surfaces.

• Stock piles and spoil heaps must be covered with tarpaulins or straw to prevent fugitive dust.

• All construction vehicles must be appropriately maintained to

39

minimise exhaust emissions Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low



Nature of impact:

There is potential for the air quality to be impacted through the construction activities that may generate dust through exposing soil and disturbing the ground. Alternative 2 is located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore increasing the potential for fugitive dust to cause a nuisance for surrounding landowners south and east of the site. Exhaust emissions produced by construction equipment will be disbursed and it is not anticipated that they will cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners.




Low, however, this will be determined by other construction activities that may produce dust taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage it is unclear what other construction activities may be taking place in the area in the second half of 2013.

Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium



• Dust suppression methods, such as wetting or laying straw, should be applied where there are large tracks of exposed surfaces.

• Stock piles and spoil heaps must be covered with tarpaulins or straw to prevent fugitive dust.

• All construction vehicles must be appropriately maintained to minimise exhaust emissions.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low to Medium Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Potential impact on biological aspects: Vegetation Loss (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: Loss of vegetation will occur as a result of vegetation clearing to prepare for construction.

Extent and duration of impact: Local limited to the site Short- term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low


Low, although the development of the Parklands suburb has resulted in extensive loss of Cape Flats Sand Fynbos habitat, the site has high levels of degradation and low restoration potential (mainly due to the isolated position and loss of surrounding habitat due to development).

Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Degree to which the impact can be mitigated: Low

Proposed mitigation: Indigenous, low maintenance and water-wise landscape design must be included in the final design.


Potential impacts on socio-economic aspects: Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

40

Nature of impact: During the construction phase, open excavations, vehicle movement and other construction activities may pose a health and safety hazard to construction workers.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to the site Short- term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Medium

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Not Applicable Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium



• The construction site must be fenced off to prohibit unauthorised access and site access must be strictly controlled.

• All employees, contractors and subcontractors to wear appropriate PPE.

• Open excavations must be clearly marked. • All employees, contractors and subcontractors must comply

with Shell’s Health and Safety Policy. • Appropriate health and safety signage must be displayed on

site. Cumulative impact post mitigation: Not Applicable Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Potential impacts on socio-economic aspects: Employment Creation (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

The construction phase will create limited employment opportunities as contractors are likely to utilize existing staff. However, the construction phase will provide job security for the existing employees of the appointed contractor.

Extent and duration of impact: Local/ regional Short- term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Not Applicable Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Not Applicable

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Medium (positive) Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low Positive

Degree to which the impact can be enhanced: Low


The following measures should be implemented to ensure that this positive impact is enhanced: • Appointed contractors must comply with Shell’s employment

equity policy. • As far as possible, local employment must be used to fill any

vacant construction jobs. • No employment applications may take place at the entrance to

the site, rather formal employment channels must be used. Cumulative impact post mitigation: Not Applicable Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low Positive

Potential impacts on cultural-historical aspects: Potential Loss of Cultural Heritage Resources (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

The construction of the service station could disturb cultural heritage artefacts buried beneath the surface. A Notice of Intent was submitted to Heritage Western Cape an in response to the NID, Heritage Western Cape stated that “no further studies are required” Appendix G includes the NID.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to the site Short - term

Probability of occurrence: Unlikely

Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Not Applicable as it is unlikely that any artefacts of cultural heritage significance would be found on the site.

Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources:

Not Applicable as it is unlikely that any artefacts of cultural heritage significance would be found on the site.

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Negligible Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Negligible

41


Proposed mitigation: If by chance an artefact of potential historical significance is uncovered during construction, Heritage Western Cape must be notified immediately.


Potential noise impacts: Noise Impact (Alternative 1)

Nature of impact:

Construction vehicles and other construction machinery will increase the noise levels during working hours. Increased noise levels may be a nuisance factor to surrounding land users and occupiers. Alternative 1 is located further from the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore reducing the potential for noise levels to cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners south and east of the site.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, confined to the site and immediate surrounds. Short- term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low


Low, however, this will be determined by other construction activities taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage it is unclear what other construction activities may be taking place in the area in the second half of 2013.




• The contractor will adhere to local authority by-laws relating to noise control.

• Construction activities will be restricted to regular working hours, i.e. Monday to Friday (8am- 5pm).

• Mechanical equipment with lower sound power levels will be selected to ensure that the permissible occupation noise-rating limit of 85 dBA is not exceeded.

• Equipment will be fitted with silencers as far as possible to reduce noise.

• All equipment to be adequately maintained and kept in good working order to reduce noise.

• Neighbouring landowners should be informed prior to any very noisy activities eg high intensity drilling. A grievance procedure will be established whereby noise complaints can be received, recorded and responded to appropriately.

• Construction workers and personnel will wear hearing protection when required.

• Noise levels must comply with the SANS 100103 – 0994 (recommended noise levels).


Potential noise impacts: Noise Impact (Alternative 2)

Nature of impact:

Construction vehicles and other construction machinery will increase the noise levels during working hours. Alternative 2 is located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore increasing the potential for noise levels to cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners south and east of the site.



Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low, however, this will be determined by other construction activities taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage it is

42

unclear what other construction activities may be taking place in the area in the second half of 2013.









• Neighbouring landowners should be informed prior to any very noisy activities eg high intensity drilling. A grievance procedure will be established whereby noise complaints can be received, recorded and responded to appropriately.

• Construction workers and personnel will wear hearing protection when required.

• Noise levels must comply with the SANS 100103 – 0994 (recommended noise levels).

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Negligible Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium

Potential visual impacts: Visual Impact (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: Visual impact caused by construction related activities such as, stockpile material, trucks, construction offices, hoarding and excavation machinery.




Low, however, this will be determined by other construction activities taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage it is unclear what other construction activities may be taking place in the area in the second half of 2013.





• The construction site, material stores, stockpiles and lay-down area should be kept tidy.

• Measures to control wastes and litter should be included in the contract specification documents.

• Wind-blown dust from stockpiles and construction activities, should be controlled.

• An environmental management plan (EMP) should be prepared and an environmental control officer (ECO) employed for the duration of the construction phase.


(b) Impacts that may result from the operational phase (briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the operational phase.

Potential impacts on the geographical and physical aspects:

Soil and Groundwater contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: There is potential for soil and/ or groundwater contamination during the operation phase, as a result of accidental spills or leaks.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, typically limited to site and immediate surrounds Long-term

43

Probability of occurrence: Possible Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low to Medium


There are four service stations within a three km radius of the site. Under normal operating circumstances the cumulative impact on soil and/ or groundwater would be Low, as minor spills are typicall limited to the site and immediate surrounds. In the unlikely event of a major leak or spill at one or more of the service stations, there is a chance of contaminants spreading from the site to other land in the area.




• Any significant spills or leak incidents must be reported in terms of the National Environmental Management Act and the Water Act.

• USTs must be fitted with automatic leak detectors that alert management to a leak.

• Fuel dispenser pumps must be located on a hardened surface to contain spillages.

• The accumulated contents of the oil/water separator must be removed by an accredited company.

• The oil/water separator must be inspected regularly to ensure that it is functioning at all times.

• Water discharged from the oil/water separator must be monitored to ensure it meets the required standard.

• Overfill and spillages during tanker refuelling and fuel dispensing should be prevented by the installation of automatic cut off devices.

• Tanker delivery drivers must be present during delivery of fuel with the emergency cut off switch.

• In the event of the pump dispenser or the hoses being knocked over or ripped off, the fuel supply must be cut off by shear-off valves.

• All forecourt staff must undergo appropriate training, which must include training to prevent spillages during fuel dispensing.

• The USTs, pipelines and other associated infrastructure must be inspected regularly for leaks and to ensure structural integrity.

• A closed coupling must be used when fuel is being transferred from the bulk delivery vehicle to the USTs.

• An Emergency Response Plan must be in place for the site, this must clearly describe emergency procedures and include emergency contact numbers.

• If contamination or leakage is detected, Shell’s Emergency Response Plan must be followed.

• Following a leak or accidental spill, a remediation plan must be compiled and executed.

• Accidental spills that may occur on the forecourt must be cleaned up immediately using a spill absorbent, which must then be removed by a licenced contractor.

• Fuel stock must be monitored on a daily basis and these records must be kept on site.

• USTs must have corrosion protection and secondary containment.

• Inspection wells will be installed within the UST containment area, at all four corners of the containment area. These wells must be inspected on a monthly basis so that leaks can be detected early.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low


Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

Impact on air quality due to exhaust fumes from motor vehicles, emissions from the vent pipes and the release of VOCs from fuel transfer. The VOCs released during fuel transfer and vents will disburse into the atmosphere shortly after being released and are not likely to travel to the surrounding areas.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to site and immediate surrounds Long-term

44

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Medium Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low



• USTs to be fitted to the breather pipes. • Vent pipes to be fitted such that they face away from the

neighbouring residential areas. • All Shell delivery vehicles will be adequately maintained to

reduce exhaust emissions. Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low


Increased Traffic Levels (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: Slight increase in traffic volumes on surrounding road network. Slight increase in non-motorised transport on surrounding road network.

Extent and duration of impact:

Local – limited to immediate adjacent road network Long-Term – life of the project. The current layout shows a left-out and right-out exit from the service station on to Wood Drive. Due to the width of Wood Drive (less than 120 m), such an exit is not permissible according to the Provincial Roads Access Guidelines 2002. As such Shell will update the layout to reflect a left-out only exit onto Wood Drive. A traffic circle is therefore proposed for the Wood Drive Thetford intersection to allow vehicles to safely make a u-turn and return to Sandown Rd.

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Negligible




• Optimise traffic light timings at traffic light intersections (note that the traffic lights are still to be built).

• Provide adequate non-motorised transport facilities (note that the sidewalks are still to be built).

• Shell will comply with the Provincial Road Access Guidelines, Document 2002.


Potential other impacts: Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

Petroleum and diesel fuel are considered dangerous substances as they are volatile and could potentially ignite under specific circumstances. Therefore, there is a risk of fire or explosions on site, which would pose a threat to on-site employees and surrounding land users and occupiers. However, this impact is highly unlikely to occur as there are numerous imbedded mitigation measures to minimize the risk of fires and explosions.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, typically limited to site or immediate surrounds Long - term

Probability of occurrence: Unlikely Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: High

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low, as it is not likely that a fire or explosion would spread to another service station.

45




• Fire extinguishers and sand bags must be readily available onsite and easily accessible.

• Fire fighting equipment must comply with SANS 1151 (Portable rechargeable fire extinguishers - Halogenated hydrocarbon type extinguishers), and be inspected regularly.

• Appropriate health and safety signage must be displayed on site.

• An Emergency Response Plan must be in place for the site, this must clearly describe emergency procedures and include emergency contact numbers.

• No smoking may be permitted on site. • No cell phones may be used during fuel dispensing. • Staff must be trained adequately so as to identify potential high

risk situations and implement the Emergency Response Plan. • Overfill and spillages during tanker refuelling and fuel dispensing

should be prevented by the installation of automatic cut off devices.

• Tanker delivery drivers must be present during delivery of fuel with the emergency cut off switch and a fire extinguisher.

• A closed coupling must be used when fuel is being transferred from the bulk delivery vehicle to the USTs to prevent fugitive emissions.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Potential impacts on the socio-economic aspects: Employment Creation (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

It is expected that 40- 45 people will be employed during the operational phase of the development, with approximately 75 percent of the employment positions being made available to previously disadvantaged South Africans.

Extent and duration of impact: Local/ regional Long- term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Not Applicable Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Not Applicable


Low, 45 employment opportunities will be created during the operation phase, bringing additional income into households. The increase in disposable income available to households will result in increased demand for goods and services and greater spending within the local community.

Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium Positive

Degree to which the impact can be enhanced: Medium


• All recruitment must be in-line with Shell’s Employment Equity Policy.

• The policy will also promote the employment of women to ensure that gender equality is attained as defined in the Employment Equity Act No 55 of 1998.

• Where possible, priority should be given to job seekers from the local area.

• Shell must build the capacity of employees through development plans, technical, health and safety training and provide them with relevant training certificates.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Medium Positive Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium Positive

Potential impacts on the socio-economic aspects: Effect of Property Values (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

The presence of a service station may cause a real or perceived decrease in property values in the adjacent area. The reverse is that the amenity benefit may be attractive to some neighbouring occupiers. The in-filling of such areas with appropriate commercial development also accords with urban planning principles.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to properties surrounding the site Long- term

46

Probability of occurrence:

Unlikely Given the indeterminable nature of this potential impact, and the fact that it may have the positive impacts described above, an unlikely probability is appropriate.

Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Indeterminable

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low


Proposed mitigation: Assuming that the design, functionality and appearance of the development will be environmentally and aesthetically acceptable, no further mitigation is appropriate.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: N/A Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) N/A

Potential impacts on the cultural-historical aspects: Not Applicable during the operation phase. Nature of impact: Extent and duration of impact: Probability of occurrence: Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources:

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High)

Degree to which the impact can be mitigated: Proposed mitigation: Cumulative impact post mitigation: Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High)

Potential noise impacts: Noise Impacts (Alternative 1)

Nature of impact:

During operation, the noises that may be associated with the service station may include music broadcast over speakers in the forecourt, staff talking amongst one another, and vehicles revving as they leave the service station. Alternative 1 is located further from the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore reducing the potential for noise levels to cause a nuisance to surrounding land users and occupiers south and east of the site. The Shell bulk delivery vehicles will not pass as close to the east boundary according to the layout of Alternative 1.


Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Not Applicable Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low


Low, the primary source of noise pollution in the area is Sandown Road and Wood Drive and it is not likely that the increased traffic on the site will create noise over and above the existing ambient noise levels.


Degree to which the impact can be mitigated: Low to Medium


• A grievance procedure will be established whereby noise complaints can be received, recorded and responded to appropriately.

• Equipment such as mechanical equipment, extraction fans, refrigerators that are fitted with noise reduction facilities (e.g. side flaps, silencers etc) must be used as per operating instructions and maintained properly.

• Noise levels should comply with the SANS Code of Practice 100103 – 0994 (recommended noise levels).

• Local by-laws for noise levels must be adhered to. Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low

47

Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Potential noise impacts: Noise Impacts (Alternative 2)

Nature of impact:

During operation, the noises that may be associated with the service station may include music broadcast over speakers in the forecourt, staff talking amongst one another, and vehicles revving as they leave the service station. Alternative 2 is located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore increasing the potential for noise levels to cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners south and east of the site. The Shell bulk delivery vehicles will pass close to the east boundary of the site according to the layout of Alternative 2, increasing the potential for the noise to create a nuisance for surrounding land users and occupiers south and east of the site.


Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Not Applicable Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low


Low, the primary source of noise pollution in the area is Sandown Road and Wood Drive and it is not likely that the increased traffic on the site will create noise over and above the existing ambient noise levels.





• Equipment such as mechanical equipment, extraction fans, refrigerators that are fitted with noise reduction facilities (e.g. side flaps, silencers etc) must be used as per operating instructions and maintained properly.

• Noise levels should comply with the SANS Code of Practice 100103 – 0994 (recommended noise levels).

• Local by-laws for noise levels must be adhered to. Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium

Potential visual impacts: (Service Station) Service Station (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

The presence of the service station in a residential area will have a visual impact in the area, particularly for the neighbouring landowners. The lighting used for signage will add the impact during the night time.


Local, including the immediately adjacent residential developments. Adjacent residential developments are generally surrounded by high perimeter walls, with each parcel of development designed as an ‘island’, mostly inward looking with internal parking courts. However, some residential developments, especially those to the east and south of the site are oriented to the north overlooking the proposed service station. Visibility is determined by the distance between the proposed service station and the viewer as well as obstruction caused by the surrounding buildings. Degree of visibility in relation to the distance of the proposed service station are as follows: 0- 100m: Highly visible 100- 250m: Moderately visible 250- 500m: Marginally visible 500m and more: Hardly visible Long term-

Probability of occurrence: High Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Not Applicable

48

Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low


Low to Medium. The proposed service station will add to the commercial activities in a residential area. The area, however, is in the process of becoming more urbanised. Further development of the service station site with additional uses is not known at this stage.

Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium to High



• Planting of trees along the boundary of the site, between the service station and the residential properties..

• Building and landscaping should receive on-going maintenance to avoid visual decay.

• Litter and waste should be effectively managed to avoid visual problems in the area.

• Architectural measures should be implemented from the design phase which includes the following: • Commercial buildings should ideally be clustered, possibly

around an internal court, to avoid the visual scatter of isolated buildings on the site.

• The facades should be modulated to provide scale in sympathy with the surrounding residential development.

• Consideration should be given to introducing pitched roofs to be more congruent with the surrounding roofscape.

• There should be no access roads, parking bays, wash bays or detail bays within the 5m building line to allow adequate space for a tree-planted buffer strip on the eastern and southern boundaries of the site.

• A dense tree-planting belt should be created on the perimeter between the service station and the adjacent residential development. The Sandown Road and Wood Drive street frontages should also be landscaped.

• A landscape plan should be prepared by a qualified landscape architect and form part of the building plan submission to the local authority.

• All yards and storage areas to be enclosed by masonry walls or screens.

• The forecourt apron and parking bays should be paved with brick or other unit pavers to minimise expansive asphalt areas.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium

Potential visual impacts: (Lighting of the service station)

Lighting of the service station (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

The lighting associated with the service station, including the need for bright lighting at night for the forecourt, and for signage in a residential area will have a visual impact in the area will create a visual impact for surrounding residents.


Local, including the immediately adjacent residential developments. Adjacent residential developments are generally surrounded by high perimeter walls, with each parcel of development designed as an ‘island’, mostly inward looking with internal parking courts. However, some residential developments, especially those to the east and south of the site are oriented to the north overlooking the proposed service station. Visibility is determined by the distance between the proposed service station and the viewer as well as obstruction caused by the surrounding buildings. Degree of visibility in relation to the distance of the proposed service station are as follows: 0- 100m: Highly visible 100- 250m: Moderately visible 250- 500m: Marginally visible 500m and more: Hardly visible Long term

Probability of occurrence: High

49

Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low to Medium Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium to High



• Planting of trees along the boundary of the site, between the service station and the residential properties..

• External lighting should be confined to the dispensing forecourt, commercial outlets and other essential areas.

• Lights should be low-level, where possible, and fitted with reflectors to avoid light spillage.

• Lights and signage should be fixed to buildings or walls, where possible, to avoid unnecessary masts and visual clutter.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium

Potential visual impacts: (Signage) Signage (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: In order for the service station to attract customers, there is a need for identifiable corporate and direction signage, most of which will be illuminated at night.


Local, including the immediately adjacent residential developments. Adjacent residential developments are generally surrounded by high perimeter walls, with each parcel of development designed as an ‘island’, mostly inward looking with internal parking courts. However, some residential developments, especially those to the east and south of the site are oriented to the north overlooking the proposed service station. Visibility is determined by the distance between the proposed service station and the viewer as well as obstruction caused by the surrounding buildings. Degree of visibility in relation to the distance of the proposed service station are as follows: 0- 100m: Highly visible 100- 250m: Moderately visible 250- 500m: Marginally visible 500m and more: Hardly visible Long term

Probability of occurrence: High Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low to Medium Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium



• Lights and signage should be fixed to buildings or walls, where possible, to avoid unnecessary masts and visual clutter.

• Signage related to the enterprise should be confined to the tower, canopy and entrances. Other corporate or advertising signage and flags should be avoided or restricted.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium to Low

50

(c) Impacts that may result from the decommissioning and closure phase (briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the decommissioning and closure phase.


Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact:

There is potential for soil and groundwater contamination as a result of accidental spills and leaks from USTs and associated infrastructure that may have occurred during the operation phase.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, typically limited to site or immediate surrounds Long-term, as hydrocarbon contamination may persist in the subsurface for an extended period before degradation takes place.

Probability of occurrence: Possible Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Low

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium



• Residual product must be removed from the USTs and associated infrastructure

• USTs must be degassed before removal. • Soil samples must be taken from the base and sides of the UST

excavation to determine whether or not the soil has been impacted during the lifespan of the UST.

• Excavated soil will be screened with a PID to ensure appropriate handling of impacted soil (i.e. bioremediation at an appropriately licensed facility) or reuse of the soil as backfill onsite. Should it be determine that the site has been impacted and the soil and/or groundwater have been contaminated, a Remediation Action Plan must be developed and implement by appropriately qualified personnel.




Nature of impact:

There is potential for the air quality to be impacted through the decommissioning activities that may generate dust through excavation activities and disturbing the ground. Alternative 1 is located further from the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore reducing the potential for fugitive dust to cause a nuisance for surrounding landowners south and east of the site. Exhaust emissions produced by construction equipment will be dispersed and it is not anticipated that they will cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners.




Low, however, this will be determined by other construction/ or decommissioning activities that may produce dust taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the decommissioning of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage, this cannot be determined, but given the nature of the surrounding landuse, it is unlikely that other decommissioning activities would be taking place.





• Stockpiles and soil heaps must be covered with tarpaulins or

51

straw to prevent fugitive dust. • All construction vehicles must be appropriately maintained to

minimise exhaust emissions Cumulative impact post mitigation: Negligible Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low



Nature of impact:

There is potential for the air quality to be impacted through the decommissioning activities that may generate dust through excavation activities and disturbing the ground. Alternative 2 is located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore increasing the potential for fugitive dust to cause a nuisance for surrounding landowners south and east of the site. Exhaust emissions produced by construction equipment will be dispersed and it is not anticipated that they will cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners.




Low, however, this will be determined by other construction/ or decommissioning activities that may produce dust taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the decommissioning of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage, this cannot be determined, but given the nature of the surrounding landuse, it is unlikely that other decommissioning activities would be taking place.





• Stockpiles and soil heaps must be covered with tarpaulins or straw to prevent fugitive dust.

• All construction vehicles must be appropriately maintained to minimise exhaust emissions


Potential impact biological aspects: Not Applicable – Following decommissioning, the site will likely be used for another type of development, but it is unlikely that the site will be restored to natural vegetation.

Nature of impact:

Potential impacts on the socio-economic aspects: Increased Traffic (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: Vehicle traffic around the site may increase and impact the natural traffic flow around the site.





52


• Co-ordination of movement of vehicles on and off site to reduce risks and prevent congestion on roads in the vicinity of the site.

• No vehicles or machinery should be serviced or refuelled onsite. • Peak traffic hours should be avoided. • Large vehicle turning must take place onsite and not in the

adjacent roads. In cases where activities may obstruct traffic, local traffic officials must be contacted.


Potential impacts on the socio-economic aspects: Loss of Employment (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: The closure of the service station will mean that those employed at the service station will no longer be required, and their employment may be terminated.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to employees employed at the service station. Long-term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Not Applicable

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Medium, the loss of employment will lead to a decrease in household income and less spending with the community.

Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium - High



• Existing employees may be transferred to another service station if feasible.

• Employees must be given adequate notice prior to closure, to allow them time to seek alternative employment.

• Service station management must supply employees with a letter of recommendation and certificate of skills to assist them with future job applications.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Medium Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Medium

Potential impacts on the socio-economic aspects: Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: During the decommissioning phase, open excavations, vehicle movement and other construction activities may pose a health and safety hazard to workers.

Extent and duration of impact: Local, limited to the site Short- term

Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: Low Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Medium

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Not Applicable Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium



• The construction site must be fenced off to prohibit unauthorised access and site access must be strictly controlled.

• All employees, contractors and subcontractors to wear appropriate PPE.

• Open excavations must be clearly marked. • All employees, contractors and subcontractors must comply

with Shell’s Health and Safety Policy. • Appropriate health and safety signage must be displayed on

site. Cumulative impact post mitigation: Not Applicable Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

Potential noise impacts: Noise and Vibrations (Alternative 1)

Nature of impact: Vehicles and other machinery required for decommissioning will increase the noise levels during working hours.

53

Decommissioning activities which are likely to cause vibrations include: • gaining access to the underground tanks through the

demolition of concrete by excavation machinery; and • entry and use of construction vehicles as well as cranes on

site.

Alternative 1 is located further from the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore reducing the potential for noise levels to cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners south and east of the site.


Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Not Applicable


Low, however, this will be determined by other construction or decommissioning activities taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the decommissioning of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage, this cannot be determined, but given the nature of the surrounding landuse, it is unlikely that other decommissioning activities would be taking place.





• Decommissioning activities will be restricted to regular working hours, i.e. Monday to Friday (8am- 5pm).




• Neighbouring landowners should be informed prior to any very noisy activities eg, high intensity drilling.


• Workers and personnel will wear hearing protection when required.


Potential noise impacts: Noise and Vibrations (Alternative 2)

Nature of impact:

Vehicles and other machinery required for decommissioning will increase the noise levels during working hours. Decommissioning activities which are likely to cause vibrations include: • gaining access to the underground tanks through the

demolition of concrete by excavation machinery; and • entry and use of construction vehicles as well as cranes on

site. Alternative 2 is located closer to the residential areas adjacent to the south and east boundary of the site, therefore, increasing the potential for noise levels to cause a nuisance to surrounding landowners south and east of the site.


Probability of occurrence: Definite Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources: Not Applicable

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low, however, this will be determined by other construction activities taking place in the immediate vicinity of the site during the construction of the Parklands Service Station. At this stage, this

54

cannot be determined, but given the nature of the surrounding landuse, it is unlikely that other decommissioning activities would be taking place.





• Decommissioning activities will be restricted to regular working hours, i.e. Monday to Friday (8am- 5pm).




• Neighbouring landowners should be informed prior to any very noisy activities eg, high intensity drilling.


• Workers and personnel will wear hearing protection when required.


(d) Any other impacts:

Potential Visual impacts: Visual Impacts (Alternative 1 and 2)

Nature of impact: Trucks used for decommissioning activities, rubble and stockpiles may cause a visual impact.

Extent and duration of impact: Localised extent and approximately 6 week duration Probability of occurrence: High

Degree to which the impact can be reversed: High, when decommissioning is complete, the visual impact associated with the decommissioning will be reversed.

Degree to which the impact may cause irreplaceable loss of resources:

None

Cumulative impact prior to mitigation: Low Significance rating of impact prior to mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low to Medium

Degree to which the impact can be mitigated: The visual impact is short-lived and will not change the nature of area significantly.


• The decommissioning area must be fenced and shade cloth attached, where necessary.

• At the end of the life of the project, structures no longer required must be demolished and removed from the site.

• Roads, parking and other paved areas no longer required must be broken up and the site re-instated or redeveloped.

Cumulative impact post mitigation: Low, there is no indication at this activity will take place at the same time as other construction or decommissioning activities in the vicinity.

Significance rating of impact after mitigation (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, or Very-High) Low

7. SPECIALIST INPUTS/STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Please note: Specialist inputs/studies must be attached to this report as Appendix G. Also take into account the Department’s Guidelines on the Involvement of Specialists in EIA Processes available on the Department’s website (http://www.capegateway.gov.za/eadp).

Specialist inputs/studies and recommendations: Botanical Specialist Study: The design of the service station should incorporate green spaces to soften and minimize the impacts of the concrete structures to be built. Indigenous plants that attract birds and insects should be incorporated into the landscaping design of the site. Low maintenance, water-wise indigenous species as recommended by the specialist (see Appendix G) should be planted on site.


55

Visual Specialist Study: Service stations, particularly if open for 24 hours, are not normally compatible immediately adjacent to residential areas. Mitigating circumstances in this case are that the medium density residential complexes are generally inward looking and do not therefore tend to orientate towards the street. The service station includes a convenience store, which could be of benefit to the local residents. Little is known about the ‘future developments’ or other proposed development on the eastern portion of the site. In order to avoid additional cumulative impacts, it is recommended that light industrial uses, such as panel-beating, tyre or shock-absorber fitting uses not be considered in this location, and that only low-key commercial uses, such as convenience stores or restaurants, be permitted. (see Appendix G). Traffic Specialist Study: To assist with the traffic flow and remain compliant with the Provincial Road Access Guidelines document, design phase mitigation measures have been recommended by the Traffic Specialist, given the current site layout plan. Shell must apply to the City of Cape Town for site access onto Sandown Rd and Wood Drive. During this application process, the recommendations made by the Traffic Specialist will be considered by the City of Cape Town and Shell. The City of Cape Town will confirm which of the recommendations must be implemented and who will be responsible for the implementation. These recommendations include: • Traffic lights must be installed at the Sandown Road/ Wood Drive intersection; • A left-in left- out access must be constructed on Wood Drive midway between Sandown Road and Thetford Road which

can accommodate heavy vehicles (fuel delivery trucks); • A traffic circle must be built at the Wood Drive/ Thetford Road intersection to allow U- turns and to accommodate fuel

delivery trucks; a bus/ mini- bus embayment be investigated on Sandown Road or Wood Drive in proximity to the proposed development;

• And the existing paved sidewalks should be incorporated into the design of the roundabout and that a paved sidewalk

be constructed on the eastern side of Wood Drive to link with existing sidewalks. Once Shell have obtained access permission from the City of Cape Town, the EMP and the Final Site Layout Plan must be updated to reflect any revised mitigation or changes to the Layout.

56

8. IMPACT SUMMARY Please provide a summary of all the above impacts. The potential impacts associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning of the Parklands Service Station, along with a pre and post mitigation signifigance rating are provided in the table below. Table 1: Construction/ Design Phase Impacts Impact Pre Mitigation Post Mitigation Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Increased Traffic Low Negligible Visual Impact (Alternative 1 and 2) Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative ) Medium Low to Medium Vegetation Loss (Alternative 1 and 2) Low Negligible Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Employment Creation (Alternative 1 and 2) Low Positive Low Positive Potential Loss of Cultural Heritage Resources (Alternative 1 and 2)

Negligible Negligible

Noise Impact (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Noise Impact (Alternative 2) Medium Low to Medium Table 2: Operation Phase Impacts Impact Pre Mitigation Post Mitigation Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Medium Low

Increased Traffic Visual Impact (Service Station) (Alternative 1 and 2) Medium to High Medium Visual Impact (Lighting) (Alternative 1 and 2) Medium to High Medium Visual Impact (Signage) (Alternative 1 and 2) Medium Low to Medium Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1 and 2) Low Low Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Medium Low

Employment Creation (Alternative 1 and 2) Low to Medium Positive Medium Positive Effect of Property Values (Alternative 1 and 2) Low N/A Noise Impact (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Noise Impact (Alternative 2) Medium Low to Medium Table 3: Decomissioning Phase Impacts Impact Pre Mitigation Post Mitigation Potential Soil and Groundwater Contamination (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Increased Traffic Low Low Visual Impact (Alternative 1 and 2) Low to Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Impact on Air Quality (Alternative ) Medium Low to Medium Occupational Health and Safety (Alternative 1 and 2)

Low to Medium Low

Loss of Employment (Alternative 1 and 2) Medium to High Medium Noise Impact (Alternative 1) Low to Medium Low Noise Impact (Alternative 2) Medium Low to Medium

9. OTHER MANAGEMENT, MITIGATION AND MONITORING MEASURES (a) Over and above the mitigation measures described in Section 6 above, please indicate any additional management,

mitigation and monitoring measures. Additional management, mitigation and monitoring measures have been included in the EMP as Appendix H. (b) Describe the ability of the applicant to implement the management, mitigation and monitoring measures. Shell have been responsible for the construction, operation and decommissioning of service stations throughout South Africa and globally for over 30 years. Shell has both the capacity and resources to implement the EMP and any other additional mitigation measures that have been recommended. Shell will draw on external consultants to assist with groundwater monitoring and remediation if required.

57

Please note: A draft ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME must be attached this report as Appendix H.

SECTION G: ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES AND CRITERIA, GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE, UNDERLAYING ASSUMPTIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES (a) Please describe adequacy of the assessment methods used. ERM’s approach to impact assessment can typically be divided into four steps, as described below:

1. Site Visit - A site visit was carried out by ERM in order to better understand the site setting and the biophysical and social context of the site and identify sensitive receptors on or around the site.

2. Impact/ Opportunity Identification and Specialist Studies – Based on past experience and what was identified on the site investigation, the consultants identified potential impacts and opportunities associated with the proposed development of a service at the Parklands site and appointed appropriate specialists to undertake specialist studies necessary to complete the impact assessment.

3. Specialist study integration and impact assessment – The specialist studies were reviewed and integrated into the BAR, and all potential impacts and opportunities identified have been described and assessed in this BAR. The methodology used to assess the potential impacts has been outlined in Section (b) below.

4. Identification of Mitigation Measures – ERM (together with the Applicant) identified measures that will be taken to avoid or minimise any potential adverse effects on the biophysical and social environment and to enhance potential opportunities during the design, construction, operation and decommissioning phases. These mitigation measures have been included in the EMP attached as Appendix H.

The adequate assessment and evaluation of the potential impacts and opportunities associated with the proposed project necessitates a scientific approach that will reduce the subjectivity involved in making such evaluations. ERM have developed a clearly defined impact assessment methodology that is used by ERM offices globally. It is our belief that the impact assessment methodology is sound and adequate to assess the potential impacts and opportunities associated with the proposed development of the Parklands Service Station. (b) Please describe the assessment criteria used. The significance of a potential impact can be described in terms of its importance. Importance relates to one or multiple factors such as: • potential cumulative effects; • the extent, duration, nature, severity and likelihood of occurrence; • the effect of the impact in terms of the degree of change to the biophysical and socio-economic environment; • the sensitivity of the receiving environment; and • an indication of whether the impact meets legal or policy requirements.

Impact Magnitude

Extent

Local – impacts that are limited to the boundaries of the development site or that affect an area in a radius of 1km around the development site. Regional – impacts that affect regionally important environmental resources or are experienced at a regional scale as determined by administrative boundaries, habitat type/ecosystem. National – impacts that affect nationally important environmental resources or affect an area that is nationally important/ or have macro-economic consequences.

Duration

Temporary – impacts are predicted to be of short duration and intermittent/occasional. Short-term – impacts that are predicted to last only for the duration of the construction period. Long-term – impacts that will continue for the life of the Project, but ceases when the project stops operating. Permanent – impacts that cause a permanent change in the affected receptor or resource (e.g. removal or destruction of ecological habitat) that endures substantially beyond the project lifetime.

Intensity

BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT: Intensity can be considered in terms of the sensitivity of the biodiversity receptor (i.e. habitats, species or communities). Negligible – the impact on the environment is not detectable. Low – the impact affects the environment in such a way that natural functions and processes are not affected. Medium – where the affected environment is altered but natural functions and processes continue, albeit in a modified way. High – where natural functions or processes are altered to the extent that they will temporarily or permanently cease.

58

Where appropriate, national and/or international standards are to be used as a measure of the impact. Specialist studies should attempt to quantify the magnitude of impacts and outline the rationale used. ____________________________________________________________ SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT: Intensity can be considered in terms of the ability of people/communities affected by the Project to adapt to changes brought about by the Project. Negligible – there is no perceptible change to people’s livelihood. Low - people/communities are able to adapt with relative ease and maintain pre-impact livelihoods. Medium – people/communities are able to adapt with some difficulty and maintain pre-impact livelihoods but only with a degree of support. High - affected people/communities will not be able to adapt to changes or continue to maintain-pre impact livelihoods.

Likelihood - the likelihood that an impact will occur Unlikely The impact is unlikely to occur. Possible The impact is likely to occur under most conditions. Definite The impact will occur.

Based on the above criteria, one can synthesise the ratings given to determine the overall significance of the impact. The significance (before mitigation) is described as: Negligible: insignificant or no impact. Low: an impact for which no mitigation or management is necessary. Medium: an impact that requires some level of effective mitigation and/or management. High: an impact, which, if not effectively mitigated and/or managed, can result in significant impacts. The significance of an impact (after mitigation) is described as: Negligible: Insignificant or no residual impacts. Low: Residual impacts which after mitigation have a >30 percent likelihood of occurrence, low in severity, restricted over time and space, and impact. Medium: Residual impacts, which after mitigation, have a 50 percent likelihood of occurring, medium-term impacts, occurring outside the site boundary. High: 100 percent likelihood of occurring, extensive over space and time (cumulative) and would potentially stop the development from occurring. (c) Please describe the gaps in knowledge. There are no significant gaps in information required for the assessment of the potential biophysical and socio-economic impacts and opportunities related to the proposed development. ERM suggests that there is sufficient information contained within this report to enable the DEA&DP to reach a decision regarding the proposed development of the Parklands Service Station. (d) Please describe the underlying assumptions. The conclusions presented in this BAR assume that the site conditions as experienced and documented during the site investigations are representatives of general and typical conditions. Assumptions made for the Traffic Impact Assessment: • A left- in left- out access will be constructed to access and exit the service station as opposed to the left- in, left- out,

right- out access as shown in the site development plan; • Traffic lights will be constructed on the Sandown Road and Wood Drive Intersection by the City of Cape Town; • The service station will be operational by 2014, thus this was used as the base year to determine the traffic impact of the

development; • Existing traffic volumes on Sandown Road and Wood Drive were increased by three percent per year, to obtain expected

background 2014 traffic volumes; • A traffic circle will be constructed at the Wood Drive, Thetford Road intersection by the time the development is

operational; • Four percent of passing traffic will stop at the service station 1; • For every 100m2 of area in the on site store, 2.83 vehicles will stop in the morning peak hour and 20 vehicles will stop in

the evening peak hour; • The fast food restaurant on site will not operate in the morning; and • For every 100m2 of area of the on site fast food restaurant, 70 vehicles will stop in the evening peak hour.

1 The South African Trip Generation Rates Document

59

(e) Please describe the uncertainties. • An impact assessment will always contain a degree of subjectivity, as it is based on the value judgment of the EIA

practitioner. The evaluation of significance is thus contingent upon values, professional judgement, and dependent upon the environmental and community context.

• ERM relied on the client to provide correct and up to date information around the proposed layout and design of the

service station. • The descriptions provided for the biophysical and socio-economic receiving environment are based on site investigations

as well on existing secondary data.

SECTION H: RECOMMENDATION OF THE EAP

In my view (EAP), the information contained in this application form and the documentation attached hereto is sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for. YES NO

If “NO”, list the aspects that should be further assessed through additional specialist input/assessment or whether this application must be subjected to a Scoping & EIR process before a decision can be made:

If “YES”, please indicate below whether in your opinion the activity should or should not be authorised: Activity should be authorised: YES NO Please provide reasons for your opinion The reasons listed below provide reasoning for the EAP’s reasoning that the project should be granted positive Environmental Authorisation: • no sensitive biological receptors were identified on the site by the botanical specialist; • Shell has the capacity and resources to adequately implement the mitigation measures stipulated in EMP; • the service station will be located in an area with sufficient traffic flow to make a business case for the presence of a

service station on the corner of Sandown Rd and Wood Dr; • while sensitive social receptors (surrounding landowners) are located close to the site, the potential impacts on these

receptors can be adequately mitigated; • the medium density residential complexes (surrounding the site) are generally inward looking and do not therefore tend

to orientate towards the street; • the service station and shop could be viewed as an amenity for the local residents; and • • the service station will capture existing traffic flow rather than increase traffic flow in the area. If you are of the opinion that the activity should be authorised, then please provide any conditions, including mitigation measures that should in your view be considered for inclusion in an authorisation. • All mitigation measures listed in the EMP must be adhered to by the Applicant and subcontractors appointed by the

Applicant. • A grievance procedure will be established whereby any complaints can be received, recorded and responded to

appropriately. • Fire extinguishers and sand bags must be readily available onsite and easily accessible. • Fire fighting equipment must comply with SANS 1151 (Portable rechargeable fire extinguishers - Halogenated

hydrocarbon type extinguishers), and be inspected regularly. • Appropriate health and safety signage must be displayed on site. • An Emergency Response Plan must be in place for the site, which must clearly describe emergency procedures and

include emergency contact numbers. • No smoking may be permitted on site. • No cell phones may be used during fuel dispensing. • Staff must be trained adequately so as to identify potential high risk situations and implement the Emergency Response

Plan. • USTs must have secondary containment. • Overfill and spillages during tanker refuelling and fuel dispensing should be prevented by the installation of automatic cut

off devices. • Tanker delivery drivers must be present during delivery of fuel with the emergency cut off switch and a fire extinguisher. • A closed coupling must be used when fuel is being transferred from the bulk delivery vehicle to the USTs to prevent

fugitive emissions. • Any significant spills or leak incidents must be reported in terms of the National Environmental Management Act and the

Water Act. • USTs must be fitted with automatic leak detectors that alert management to a leak. • Fuel dispenser pumps must be located on a hardened surface to contain spillages. • The accumulated contents of the oil/water separator must be removed by an accredited company. • The oil/water separator must be inspected regularly to ensure that it is functioning at all times. • Water discharged from the oil/water separator must be monitored to ensure it meets the required standard. • Overfill and spillages during tanker refuelling and fuel dispensing should be prevented by the installation of automatic cut

off devices. • Tanker delivery drivers must be present during delivery of fuel with the emergency cut off switch. • In the event of the pump dispenser or the hoses being knocked over or ripped off, the fuel supply must be cut off by

60

shear-off valves. • All forecourt staff must undergo appropriate training, which must include training to prevent spillages during fuel

dispensing. • The USTs, pipelines and other associated infrastructure must be inspected regularly for leaks and to ensure structural

integrity. • A closed coupling must be used when fuel is being transferred from the bulk delivery vehicle to the USTs. • An Emergency Response Plan must be in place for the site andmust clearly describe emergency procedures and include

emergency contact numbers. • If contamination or leakage is detected, Shell’s Emergency Response Plan must be followed. • Following a leak or accidental spill, a remediation plan must be compiled and executed. • Accidental spills that may occur on the forecourt must be cleaned up immediately using a spill absorbent, which must

then be removed by a licenced contractor. • Fuel stock must be monitored on a daily basis and these records must be kept on site. • USTs must have corrosion protection. • Inspection wells will be installed within the UST containment area, at all four corners of the containment area. These wells

must be inspected on a monthly basis so that leaks can be detected early. • Commercial buildings should ideally be clustered, possibly around an internal court, to avoid the visual scatter of isolated

buildings on the site. • The facades should be modulated to provide scale in sympathy with the surrounding residential development, as far as

possible. • Consideration should be given to introducing pitched roofs to be more congruent with the surrounding roofscape. • There will be no access roads, parking bays, wash bays or detail bays within the 5m building line to allow adequate

space for a tree-planted buffer strip on the eastern and southern boundaries of the site. • A dense tree-planting belt will be created on the perimeter between the service station and the adjacent residential

development. The Sandown Road and Wood Drive street frontages will also be landscaped. • A landscape plan must be prepared for the site and form part of the building plan submission to the local authority. • All yards and storage areas to be enclosed by masonry walls or screens. • The forecourt apron and parking bays should be paved with brick or other unit pavers to minimise expansive asphalt

areas, this does not apply to areas that must be impervious to limit potential contamination of soil • External lighting must be confined to the dispensing forecourt, commercial outlets and other essential areas, as far as

possible. • Lights should be low-level, where possible, and fitted with reflectors to avoid light spillage. • Lights and signage must be fixed to buildings or walls, where possible, to avoid unnecessary masts and visual clutter. • Signage related to the enterprise must be confined to the tower, canopy and entrances. Other corporate or advertising

signage and flags should be avoided or restricted. Duration and Validity: Environmental authorisations are usually granted for a period of three years from the date of issue. Should a longer period be required, the applicant/EAP is requested to provide a detailed motivation on what the period of validity should be.

61

SECTION I: APPENDICES The following appendices must be attached to this report:

Appendix Tick the box if Appendix is attached

Appendix A: Locality map

Appendix B: Site plan(s)

Appendix C: Photographs

Appendix D: Biodiversity overlay map

Appendix E: Permit(s) / license(s) from any other organ of state including service letters from the municipality

Appendix F:

Public participation information: including a copy of the register of interested and affected parties, the comments and responses report, proof of notices, advertisements and any other public participation information as required in Section C above.

Appendix G: Specialist Report(s) Specialist Declerations will be included in the Final BAR

Appendix H : Environmental Management Programme

Appendix I: Additional information related to listed waste management activities (if applicable) N/A

Appendix J: Any Other Heritage Western Cape