Bata

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Bata

Citation preview

Assignment 3 Strategic Management Junaid Baig 10108135 Muhammad Shoaib Hanan 10108117 Asad Baig

4Assignment 3 Strategic Management Junaid Baig 10108135 Muhammad Shoaib Hanan 10108117 Asad Baig

BATA: Strategic ChoicesQ1) why did Bata develop as a vertically integrated producers?Ans: Because they wanted to make strong brand image by providing consistent shoe quality at affordable prices. They wanted to improve the supply chain co-ordination. Through vertical integration they have more opportunities to differentiate by means of increased control over inputs. They wanted to capture upstream and downstream profit margins. They wanted to minimize the risk factors about quality and increased the entry barriers to the potential competitors.Q2) what events triggered the emergence of specialized firms along the value chain?Ans: These are the events that triggered the emergence of specialized Firms;1. Consumer buying power increased in 1980s.2. Trade barriers decreased in 2000s.3. The development of leather export industry.4. Remittance from migrant workers in the Middle East, together with the Afghan war, resulted in 6 % annual gross national product growth and increase consumer spending that resulted in threefold increase in shoe retailers and footwear manufacturer.5. The number of lather tanneries tripled during 1981-91 from 180 to 509, making quality finished leather widely available to small footwear manufacturer. Q3) why did Bata enter and then later leave the tanning business? Why did Bata outsource women`s fashion shoes and leather uppers, but not canvas shoes, slippers and joggers?Ans: They prefer to outsource complicated and trendy fashionable shoes because of their small volume. Due to small volume company incurred a high cost as compared to other shoes like joggers, slippers and canvas shoes. The sale of canvas shoes, slippers and joggers was very high as compared to women`s fashion shoes thats why they prefer to outsource them rather than to built in-house. Bata first entered and then leave the tanning business because they want to make a strong brand image by providing consistent shoe quality at affordable prices.Q4) Evaluate recent changes in channel policies in the light of Bata decision to focus on a few premium brands. Should Bata launch specialized Marie Claire Concept Stores for women`s fashion stores?Ans: Bata`s balance sheet showed a sharp increase in trade debt, which consisted mainly of credit to distributors. Trade debt increases from Rs 114 million in 1998 to 330 million in 1999 and 674 million in 2001. Whole sale volume was high but the margins were very low. Thats why company changed its policy to get out of price sensitive wholesale market and concentrate on market premium brands through company owned stores. Company Categories its own stores as A, B, C, and D. Exhibit 1 Shows that the highest sale occurred in Category A stores which constitutes only premium brand as compared to the other Categories so company decision to focus on some premium brands was right because of the market condition. It would be better advised to move out of the fashion footwear for women, as again prospective buyers in this segment will not really be able to associate style or fashion with a brand like Bata known for its functional footwear offering utility and reliability etc. So even if they do bring out a fashion brand Bata would not be in a position to challenge the supremacy of local, more responsive and trendy stores famous for women footwear. However they may continue to carry brands like Power, Weinbrenner for which they have exclusive distribution rights and also focus on their successful brands like Bubble gummers.Q5) Over the years, Bata has gradually decreased the level of in-house manufacturing while increasing its ownership and control over distribution and marketing. Discuss.Ans: In 1980s leather and footwear industry expanded and markets became more efficient. Smaller manufacturers who do not had access to quality raw materials, low cost capital, imported technology and distribution networks gained access to that, and developed specialized expertise. Therefore Bata and Servis faced who were facing competition from these smaller firms aswell asimported footwear started developingsupply networks to remain competitive. During 1981 to 1992 the no of tanneries tripled (from 180 to 509), making quality finished leather widely available to footwear manufacturers. As a result of the changed economics of vertical integration during the eighties, both Bata and Servis started a process of de-integration in the late 1990s. Bata diversified out ofleather tanning in 1996 and embarked on a program to increase outsourcing to specialized vendors and there labor force decreased by 20%. Bata increased their company owned stores from 160 to 256 and decrease their agencies from 100 to 91 and k-Scheme stores from 60 to 25. Q6) Discuss the impact of alliance with Shafi, Firaj, and Chinese producers on Bata`s Core competencies and competitive advantage. Is Bata inadvertently strengthening its own competition through these alliances?Ans: China is not being a threat for Bata because now a days peoples prefer quality products and china only provide the low cost products not the quality products so they did not think about alliance with Chinese producers. If Bata will make an alliance with Chinese producers then their reputation of quality products will suffer and it will decrease the company`s brand image. Shafi Group produces only premium shoes which is against the target market of Bata. But by making alliance with Shafi Group they can increase their market share which is according to the CEO of SIL`` only those who have the large market share and volumes will survive``. But according to my point of view they can`t do any alliance with any one of the above because it can hurt Bata`s Image in the eyes of their consumers.

Exhibit 1 Profile of a typical retail outlet by categoryABCD

Annual Sales16.26.72.52.1

Size in square feet22001450800700

No. of SKUs12501040960635

No. of outlets224127732

No. co-owned223720816