BBL - DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 15 - REMEDIAL ... · 22.1 Lagoon Samples 7 2.22 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures 8 2.23 Stormwater Conveyances 8 22.4 Additional Samples 8 2.2.5

HUNTON& 200 PARK AVENUENEW YORK, NEWTORK 101664)136TEL 212 •309* 1000FAX 212 • 309 • 1100

February 6,2002

KATHY ROBBDIRECT DIAL: 212-309-1128EMAIL: krobb9hunton.com

FILE NO: 22948.002107

Mary Lynn Taylor, Esq.United States Dept. of the InteriorOffice of the SolicitorThree Parkway CenterSuite 385Pittsburgh, PA 15220

Via Overnight DeliveryRenita Ford, Esq.Environment & Natural Resources DivisionEnvironment Enforcement Section1425 New York Avenue, N.W.Room 13063Washington, D.C. 20005

Eileen Furey, Esq.Office of Regional CounselUnited States Environmental Protection Agency77 Jackson Blvd.Chicago, IL 60604

Re: Copies of RI/FS Submittals Related to the Plainwell Mill and 12th Street Landfill

Dear Renita, Eileen, and Mary:

Enclosed are copies of the following technical documents related to the 12th Street LandfillOperable Unit and the Plainwell Mill:

• Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site Description ofCurrent Situation, Volumes I, n, & ffi; Appendices B, E, and Aerial Photographs, May1992

• Test Pit Investigation Technical Memorandum, 12th Street Landfill Operable Unit,Plainwell, Michigan, Allied Paper, IncTPortage Creek/Kalamazoo River SuperfundSite, February 18,1994

• Technical Memorandum 8, Remedial Investigation, 12th Street Landfill Operable Unit,Plainwell, Michigan, Allied Paper, IncTPortage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteVolumes I, H, and m, May 1994

ATLANTA AUSTIN BANGKOK BRUSSELS CHARLOTTE DALLAS HONG KONG KNOXVILLE LONDONMCLEAN MIAMI NEW YORK NORFOLK RALEIGH RICHMOND WARSAW WASHINGTON

www.hunton.com

HUNTON&WILLIAMS ————————————————Renita Ford, Esq.Eileen Furey, Esq.Mary Lynn Taylor, Esq.February 6,2002Page 2

• Draft Technical Memorandum 15, Mill Investigations, Allied Paper, IncTPortageCreek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study,Volumes I and n, December, 1994

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Best regards.

Yours very truly,

iKw\Kat ly Robb y

Enc osures j

cc: w/out enclosureRobert Saunders, Esq.Pamela Barker, Esq.

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY

DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 15MILL INVESTIGATIONS

VOLUME I OF II

Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfiind Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan

December 1994

BUSIAND, BOUCK ft IS, INC.ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS

DRAFT FOR STATE AND FEDERAL REVIEW

Allied Paper, Inc. I Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

Draft Technical Memorandum 15Mill Investigations

Allied Paper, Inc./Portage CreeK/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan

December 1994

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS & QEOSdENTJSTS

6723 Towpath RoadSyracuse. New York 13214

(315) 446-9120


Table of ContentsPage

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 11.1 RI Location Descriptions and Background 1

1.1.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill 11.1.2 Sirapson Plainwell Mill 21.13 Portage Paper Mill 21.1.4 Former King Mill 31.1.5 Former Monarch Mill • ' • 41.1.6 King Street Storm Sewer 4

1.2 Objectives of the Remedial Investigations 413 Scope of the Technical Memorandum 5

SECTION 2 - INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES 62.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill 6

2.1.1 Former Lagoons 62.12 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures 62.13 Stormwater Conveyances 72.1.4 Additional Samples 7

2.2 Simpson Plainwell Mill 722.1 Lagoon Samples 72.22 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures 82.23 Stormwater Conveyances 822.4 Additional Samples 82.2.5 Warehouse Sampling 9

23 Portage Paper Mill 92.4 Former King Mill 10

2.4.1 Former Lagoons 102.4.2 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures 102.43 Stormwater Conveyance System 11

2.5 Former Monarch Mill 112.6 King Street Storm Sewer 112.7 Sample Collection Methods 122.8 QA/QC Review of Data 12

WM4MN BLASLANQ, BOUCK ft LEE, INC.I* SCIENTISTS


Table of Contents (Cont'd)SECTION 3 - INVESTIGATION RESULTS 14

3.1 Field Data 143.1.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill 143.1.2 Simpson Plainwell Mill 143.13 Portage Paper Mill 153.1.4 Former King Mill 153.1.5 Former Monarch Mill 163.1.6 King Street Storm Sewer 17

3.2 Analytical Data 1732.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill 17322 Simpson Plainwell Mill 183.2.3 Portage Paper Mill 193.2.4 R>rmer King Mill 193.2.5 Former Monarch Mill 2032.6 King Street Storm Sewer 20

SECTION 4 - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS 214.1 Field Data 21

4.1.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill 214.1.2 Simpson Plainwell Mill 214.1.3 Portage Paper Mill 214.1.4 Former King Mill 214.1.5 Former Monarch Mill 224.1.6 King Street Storm Sewer 22

4.2 Analytical Data 2242.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill 23422 Simpson Plainwell Mill 244.23 Former King Mill 2542.4 Former Monarch Mill 26425 King Street Storm Sewer 26

43 Conclusions 27

REFERENCES 28

MM4MN BLASLANQ, BOUCK ft LEE, INC.


TABLES

2-1 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program - Target Compound List/Target Analyte List2-2 Summary of Remedial Investigation Residuals/Soil/Solids Samples2-3 Sample Delivery Group Summary

3-1 Georgia-Pacific Mill Summary of Boring/Core Held Data3-2 Simpson Plainwell Mill Summary of Boring Field Data3-3 Former King Mill Summary of Boring Held Data3-4 Former Monarch Mill Summary of Boring Field Data3-5 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Core Field Data3-6 Georgia-Pacific Mill Summary of Detected PCS Results for Residuals/Soil Samples3-7 Georgia-Pacific Mill Summary of Detected PCDD/PCDF Results for Stormwater-Related Sample3-8 Simpson Plainwell Mill Summary of Detected PCB Results for Residuals/Soil Samples3-9 Simpson Plainwell Mill Summary of Detected PCDD/PCDF Results for Stormwater-Related Sample3-10 Simpson Plainwell Mill Warehouse Construction Site Sampling Summary of PCB RISc™

Immunoassay Soil Tests3-11 Former King Mill Summary of Detected PCB Results for Residuals/Soil Samples3-12 Former King Mill Summary of Detected PCDD/PCDF Results for Stormwater-Related Sample3-13 Former Monarch Mill Summary of PCB Results for Residuals/Soil Samples3-14 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Detected PCB Results for Soil Samples3-15 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Detected TCL VOC, SVOC, and Pesticide Results for Soil

Samples3-16 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Detected TAL Results for Soil Samples

4-1 Georgia-Pacific Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for Total PCB in Sofland Residuals

4-2 Georgia-Pacific Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for PCDD/PCDFin Stormwater-Related Sample

4-3 Simpson Plainwell Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for Total PCB inSoil and Residuals

4-4 Simpson Plainwell Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for PCDD/PCDFin Stormwater-Related Sample

4-5 Former King Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for Total PCB in Sofland Residuals

HM4MN BLASLAND, BOUCK * LEE, INC.IftSCIENTWTB


4-6 Former King Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for PCDD/PCDF inStormwater-Related Sample

4-7 Former Monarch Mill Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for Tbtal PCB inResiduals

4-8 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for Total PCBin Surficial Soil/Residuals

4-9 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for TCL VOC,SVOC, and Pesticides in Soil Sample

4-10 King Street Storm Sewer Summary of Detected Concentrations and Cleanup Criteria for TAL in SoilSample

FIGURES

1 Location Plan2 Georgia-Pacific Mill - Sampling Locations3 Simpson Plainwell Mill - Sampling Locations4 Portage Paper Mill - Proposed Sampling Locations5 Former King Mill - Sampling Locations6 Former Monarch Mill - Sampling Locations7 King Street Storm Sewer - Sampling Locations8 Simpson Plainwell Mill - Warehouse Construction Site Sampling Locations9 Georgia-Pacific Mill - Residuals/Soil PCB and PCDD/PCDD Data10 Simpson Plainwell Mill - Residuals/Soil PCB and PCDD/PCDF Data11 Simpson Plainwell Mill - Warehouse Construction Site PCB Results12 Former King Mill - Residuals/Soil PCS and PCDD/PCDF Data13 Former Monarch Mill - Residuals/Soil PCB Data14 King Street Storm Sewer - Residuals/Soil PCB Data15 King Street Storm Sewer - Pesticide and TCI/CAL Detections

BLASLAND, BOUCK ft LEE, INC.Ift I


APPENDICES

Appendix A Field DocumentationAppendix B QA/QC Review of Data - Summary of Precision and Accuracy AssessmentAppendix C Data Review ReportsAppendix D Chain-of-Custody RecordsAppendix E Subsurface Logs

«XM4MN BLASLANDb BOUCK & LEE, INC.I* SCIENTISTS


Disclaimer"Disclaimer: This document is a DRAFT document prepared by the respondents pursuant to a governmentAdministrative Order. This document has not received final acceptance from the Michigan Department ofNatural Resources. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed, unless otherwise stated, are thoseof the authors and not those of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources."

Note: After review and final acceptance of this document, the Disclaimer will read as follows:

Disclaimer"Disclaimer: This document was prepared by the respondents pursuant to a government AdministrativeOrder. This document has received final acceptance from the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed, unless otherwise noted, are those of the author and notthose of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources."

1BM4MN BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENOWHMft KtENTISrS


SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.1 Rl Location Descriptions and Background

As part of the Allied Paper, Ino/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS), six different properties were investigated. This technicalmemorandum describes RI activities and preliminary results for the following properties:

• Georgia-Pacific Corporation Kalamazoo Mill;• Simpson Plainwell Paper Company Mill;• Portage Paper Mill;• Former King Mill;• Former Monarch Mill; and• The King Street Storm Sewer area.

Locations of the mills and the King Street Storm Sewer area are shown on Figure 1.

1.1.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill

The Georgia-Pacific Corporation Kalamazoo Mill (Georgia-Pacific Mill) property is located at 2425King Highway hi Kalamazoo, Michigan (Figure 2). The property is bordered to the south by KingHighway (M-96) and to the southwest and west by the Kalamazoo River.

The Georgia-Pacific Mill property, formerly known as the Kalamazoo Paper Company, has beenoperated as a paper making facility by several companies since the mid-1800s, and continues toproduce paper.

Prior to constructing a primary darifier in 1954 for treatment of its process waste, all industrialwastewater from the mill was discharged into the Kalamazoo River in accordance with standardpractices at the time. After the primary darifier was constructed, the clarified effluent (overflow)from the darifier was directed to the Kalamazoo River, and the underflow wastewater was pumpedto two adjacent lagoons. The King Highway dewatering lagoons were constructed on the opposite sideof the river hi the late 1950s for dewatering die underflow from the darifier. The five on-site lagoonswere subsequently used only as emergency lagoons until 1980 when they were excavated and partiallybackfilled with soil.

A more extensive review of the physical setting and characteristics of the Georgia-Pacific Mfll iscontained hi the Allied Paper. IncJPor**** Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site Description of theCurrent Situation (DCS) report (Blasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C., 1992), and the Allied Paper.Inc./Portape Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Work Plan (Work Plan; Blasland & BouckEngineers, P.C., 1993b).

LASUMD, BOUCK ALEE, INC.


1.1.2 Simpson Plainwell MiU

The Simpson Plainwell Company Mill (Simpson Plainwell Mill) property is located at 200 AlleganStreet in Plainwell, Michigan (Figure 3). The 34-acre property is bordered by Scott Street to thenorthwest and by the Kalamazoo River to the north and east

This mill has produced a wide variety of paper products during its 106 years of operation. Deinkingof waste paper prior to reuse of the fiber was practiced at the mill until 1962, when deinkingoperations at the mill ended.

Process wastewater was discharged directly into the Kalamazoo River in accordance with standardpractices at the time until 1954 when a darifier was installed adjacent to the mill to provide primaryclarification. The clarified effluent was discharged into the Kalamazoo River, and lagoons wereinstalled to contain the wastewater underflow from the darifier. The lagoons were excavated twicea year and the paper-making residuals (residuals) were taken to the 12th Street Landfill. As part ofan expanded wastewater treatment system, an aeration basin and secondary clarifier were installed in1967, with clarified effluent discharged to the Kalamazoo River and the underflow directed to thelagoons.

In 1981, a new primary darifier was constructed and the original one razed. Also in 1981, amechanical dewatering system was installed to produce a cake of 30 to 40 percent solids.Consequently, the lagoons ceased to receive residuals. Residuals produced from the mechanicaldewatering system were disposed at commercial landfills. Residuals remaining in some of the lagoonswere removed hi 1981 and taken to the 12th Street Landfill. These lagoons are presently covered withsoil and vegetated. The present wastewater treatment facilities were constructed over some of theformer lagoon locations.

The wastewater treatment system was updated in 1983 when the original secondary darifier was takenout of service and a new secondary darifier was installed. In addition, the aeration basin was takenout of service, partially backfilled, and replaced by an activated sludge treatment system. Theactivated sludge treatment system is in use today along with primary and secondary darifiers.

A more extensive review of the physical setting and characteristics of the Simpson Plainwell Mill iscontained in the DCS and the Work Plan.

1.1.3 Portage Paper Mill

The Portage Paper Mill property is located along Portage Creek, approximately 3 miles upstream fromPortage Creek's confluence with the Kalamazoo River (Figure 4). The property is approximately 40acres hi area. Mill C is bordered to die south by Alcott Street, to the north by Bryant Street, to theeast by Portage Road, and to the west by Portage Creek. Mill D is bordered to the south by BryantStreet, to the north by Reed Street, to die east by Belford Street, and to the west by die ConrailRailroad tracks.

AND, BOUCK&LEE, INC. 2


The property has been the site of paper manufacturing since 1895, the year the Bryant PaperCompany was formed. The mill used both deinked recycled paper products and virgin pulp toproduce a variety of high-quality papers. The mill was sold to the St. Regis Paper Company in 1946,and to Allied Paper, Inc. in 1956. Originally, there were five mills (A through E). Waste paper wasdeinked and recycled at Mill A until 1971. Mill A was sold a series of times and then finally razedaround 1978.

A more extensive review of the physical setting and characteristics of the Portage Paper Mill iscontained in the DCS and the Work Plan.

1.1.4 Former King Mill

The former King Mill property is located southeast of the intersection of East Vine Street andClarence Street in the city of Kalamazoo, Michigan (Figure 5). The property is bordered to the northby East Vine Street, to the west by Clarence Street, to the south by Lake Street, and to the east bythe Grand Trunk Railroad right-of-way.

The King Mill was founded in 1901, and was purchased by Allied Paper, Inc. in 1922. Although itis unknown when deinking began at the King Mill, deinking operations ended in 1965.

Until 1955, untreated wastewater was conveyed to the Kalamazoo River, in accordance with standardpractices at the time, via a 48-inch diameter pipe. After 1955, the wastewater was treated in saveallsand a 110-foot diameter clarifier. A large portion of the clarified effluent was reused in the paper-making process, and the remaining effluent conveyed to the Kalamazoo River via the 48-inch diameterpipe.

Residuals produced from mill operations were dewatered and disposed at the A-Site. Based upon theinterpretation of aerial photographs, residuals were evidently held in one or two on-site lagoons. Inaddition, another clarifier was built and operated in the 1960s and early 1970s.

The King Mill was operated by Allied Paper, Inc. until 1971, after which it was sold to Arthur P. Doreand Shirley Dore of the Dore Wrecking Company, now Dore Enterprises located in Bay City,Michigan. They are the owners of the majority of the property, which consists of 14 parcels.

The King Mill was razed hi 1978. Since that time, the lot has been covered by grass and shrub-typevegetation. Two former lagoons to the east and the location of the clarifier to the northeast of themill have been covered with vegetation.

A more extensive review of the physical setting and characteristics of the former King Mill iscontained in the DCS and the Work Plan,

BLASLAND, BOUCK A LEE, INC.* SCIENTISTS


1.1.5 Former Monarch Mill

The former Monarch Mill property is located southeast of the intersection of Cork Street and theConrail Railroad tracks in the township of Kalamazoo, Michigan (Figure 6). The property is borderedto the north by Cork Street and to the west by Portage Creek.

The Monarch Mill, originally the Kalamazoo Paper Company Mill, began producing paper in 1867.After several ownership changes the Monarch Paper Company bought the mill and merged hi 1922with Allied Paper, Inc.

Until the early 1950s, process waste from the mill was discharged directly into Portage Creek inaccordance with standard practices at the time. In the 1950s, Allied Paper, Inc. constructed a primarytreatment facility for the mill's wastewater. The company installed a clarifier and established residualsdewatering and storage lagoons, which are located to the north of Cork Street Note that thewastewater treatment facilities and residuals disposal area are on the opposite side of Cork Street andare being investigated as part of the Allied Paper, Inc. Operable Unit The former millrace appearsto be an identifiable remaining on-site structure that may contain historic residuals.

The Monarch Mill produced carbon tissue and paper using kraft and deinked stock. The mill wasclosed and razed in 1980.

A more extensive review of the physical setting and characteristics of the former Monarch Mill iscontained in the DCS and the Work Plan.

1.1.6 King Street Storm Sewer

The King Street Storm Sewer area is located between the northwest section of the King HighwayLandfill Operable Unit and Riverview Paper (Figure 7) and consists of the east and west banks of aninlet of the Kalamazoo River with two culverts at its head. This inlet is approximately 135 feet inlength. Two separate culverts are located at the upstream end of the inlet: a 10-foot by 5-footconcrete box culvert and a 48-inch diameter concrete circular culvert/pipe. Two abandoned manholesare located east of the 48-inch diameter pipe. Based upon interpretation of historical aerialphotographs, the larger box culvert appears to be the King Street Storm Sewer outfall and the 48-inchdiameter pipe appears to be the former wastewater outfall from the former King Mill. The KingStreet Storm Sewer includes floodplain soils at the discharge point where it empties into theKalamazoo River.

A more extensive review of the physical setting and characteristics of the King Street Storm Sewerarea is contained in the DCS and the Work Plan.

BLASLAMD, BOUCKALEE, INC.t A SCIENTISTS


1.2 Objectives of the Remedial Investigations

The primary objective of the mill investigations was to assess whether any of the existing or former papermill properties may be a potential source of potychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) to the Kalamazoo River orPortage Creek. Due to the high detection limit for PCB in water samples relative to the levels consideredsignificant by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), the sampling activities focused onmill residuals and solid residue which may come into contact with surface runoff, as well as any other watersdischarged to the Kalamazoo River and Portage Creek, other than effluent from permitted wastewaterdischarges. Polychlorinated dibenzodiorins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF) were alsoscreened at select locations. Aspects of mill operations which are covered by other regulatory programs suchas wastewater treatment and discharge are not included in the RI activities. Corollary objectives include:

• Assess the presence, if any, and distribution of PCB in former on-site lagoons;• Assess the presence of PCB, if any, in former and present wastewater treatment structures and

piping;• Assess the presence of PCDD/PCDF, if any, in former and present stormwater conveyance piping;

and• Evaluate potential environmental and human exposure and risks.

1.3 Scope of the Technical Memorandum

The scope of this technical memorandum indudes both the presentation of results and the preluninaryfindings of the Mill Investigations. Also included are the field data, analytical data, and the results of thequality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) review of analytical data.

BLAStAND, BOUCK A LEE, INC.


SECTION 2 • INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIESAt each mill property, soil, solids, sediment, or residuals were evaluated by the installation of borings andcores, followed by sampling and laboratory analysis. The field sampling activities included sample analysisfor PCB and select sample analysis for PCDD/PCDF, as directed by the Work Plan. In addition, one samplefrom the King Street Storm Sewer was analyzed for CLP TCL/TAL constituents (Bible 2-1). Fielddocumentation associated with the investigation activities is presented in Appendix A.

Table 2.2 summarizes the samples collected as part of the investigations, and Figures 2 through 7 presentsampling locations.

2.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill

The investigation of the Georgia-Pacific Mill property was performed to determine the presence, if any, ofPCB associated with the mill's five former on-site lagoons, former wastewater treatment system darifier, andstormwater runoff at the mill. The investigation also assessed the nature and extent of residuals.

2.1.1 Former Lagoons

Ib characterize the nature and extent of residuals in the former lagoons, a field reconnaissance wasperformed and eight borings installed. The reconnaissance was conducted by probing the groundsurface with a hand shovel in the vicinity of the lagoons. Based on the observed residuals from thereconnaissance, six borings (GPL-1 through GPL-4, GPL-6, and GPL-2B) and two cores (GPL-5 andGPL-7) were installed hi the five former lagoons at the locations shown on Figure 2.

Borings and cores were sampled continuously to provide for visual characterization. At locationsGPL-1, GPL-2, GPL-3, GPL-4, and GPL-5, samples were collected from select intervals and analyzedfor PCB. The borings and cores were installed using a hand-driven stainless-steel bucket auger orLexan® tubing. All samples were collected in a manner consistent with the Allied Paper. Inc./FbrtagcCrcek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site Field Sampling Plan (FSP; Blasland & Bouck Engineers P.C.,1993c).

Upon completion, and as directed by the MDNR, all borings were abandoned by refilling the boreholewith the cuttings removed with the auger. The remainder of the borehole annulus was filled withhydrated bentonite. All boring and core locations were flagged and subsequently surveyed forhorizontal and vertical control.

2.1.2 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures

A sample was collected from the former primary clarifier to assess the presence, if any, of PCB. Asection of Lexan® tubing and a hand pump were used to collect the sample from the former primaryclarifier (GPC-1). The sample location is shown on Figure 2. This sample was analyzed for PCB.

BLASLWD, BOUCK A LEE, INC.* SCIENTISTS


2.1.3 Stormwater Conveyances

A stormwater drainage analysis of the mill was performed and the results reported in TechnicalMemorandum 1 - Mill Investigation/Proposed Stormwater Sediment Sampling Locations, which wasapproved by the MDNR in January 1994 and then submitted hi February 1994 (TechnicalMemorandum 1; Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.). The drainage analysis assessed an overall stormwatercatchment area to locate a representative stormwater sediment collection point (GPD-1). The samplelocation is shown on Figure 2. The GPD-1 sample was collected with a stainless steel trowel andsubmitted for PCB and PCDD/PCDF analyses.

2.1.4 Additional Samples

At the MDNR's request, one additional sample (GPP-1) was collected. The sample location is shownon Figure 2. This sample was taken from a pile of gypsum-like substance located to the west ofLagoon 3. This sample was collected with a stainless-steel hand trowel and submitted for PCBanalysis.

Collection of QA/QC samples was done hi conjunction with the collection of the samples. The number ofQA/QC samples for this purpose followed the guidelines presented hi the Allied Paper. Inc./PortageCreek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP; Blasland & BouckEngineers, EC., 1993d).

2.2 Simpson Plainwell Mill

The investigation of the Simpson Plainwell Mill property was performed to determine the presence, if any,of PCB at the former mill lagoons, the former wastewater treatment system, and the stormwaterconveyances. The investigation also assessed the nature and extent of residuals.

2 .1 Lagoon Samples

Ib characterize the nature and extent of residuals hi the former lagoons (A through N) at theSimpson Plainwell Mill, 13 borings (SPL-1 through SPL-13) were drilled at the locations shown onFigure 3. The locations of the 13 borings were selected during an initial field reconnaissance. Thefield reconnaissance was conducted to determine the location of the former lagoons and a formeraeration basin. The lagoon boundaries were estimated by measuring from the existing fenceline andcorrelating those measurements with a site map. Existing surface depressions were also taken intoaccount while locating the lagoons.

Note that boring location SPL-9 was to be completed hi former Lagoon I. However, upon initialinstallation of SPL-9, it became evident that the location was on top of a mound, which may havebeen the berm of the former lagoon. As a result, the boring was terminated at 6 feet below groundsurface (bgs) and the boring location labeled SPL-9A, The boring location was moved 4 feet to theeast, and completed as SPL-9B. Each boring was sampled continuously with a split-spoon samplerfor visual characterization. Samples from select depth intervals at locations SPL-1 through SPL-5 were

BLASLAMD, BOUCK A LEE, INC.i in IIMII n


to be collected for PCB analysis, in accordance with the Work Plan. However, samples were selectedfor analysis from borings SPL-11 and SPL-13 as alternatives to the samples from borings SPL-3 andSPL-5, due to the lack of a residuals layer at these borings. All samples were collected in the mannerprescribed in the FSP.

A residuals sample from the former aeration basin (SPL-6) was not collected due to the lack of anobserved residuals layer in the boring. However, one soil sample was collected from both the 0.0 to0.5 feet bgs interval, and the 2- to 4-foot bgs interval.

Upon completion, all borings were abandoned by pumping the borehole full with a cement/bentonite(approximately 4 percent bentonite) grout Cuttings were placed in containers, as described in theAllied Paper. Inc./Portage Creck/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site Health and Safety Plan (HASP;Blasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C., 1993a) and were transported to the 12th Street Landfill OperableUnit for storage at the end of the field program. All boring and core locations were flagged andsubsequently surveyed for horizontal and vertical control.

2^2 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures

Two solids samples (SPC-1 and SPC-2) were collected from former wastewater treatment plantstructures to assess the presence of PCB. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 3. SPC-1 wascollected from the area of the razed primary darifier. SPC-2 was collected from the end of a formerdischarge pipe that had historically conveyed process water to the Kalamazoo River. These twosamples (SPC-1 and SPC-2) were collected using a stainless-steel trowel.

The Work Plan described sampling from the former secondary darifier (SPC-3); however, withMDNR concurrence, SPC-3 was not sampled because there were no solids observed in the secondarydarifier.

2^3 Stonnwater Conveyances

A stormwater drainage analysis of the mfll was performed and the results reported in TechnicalMemorandum 1. As outlined hi Technical Memorandum 1, a sample was to be collected from OutfallA, however, since no sediment was present in the Outfall, Outfall B was used as an alternate. Thedrainage analysis identified an overall stormwater catchment area to locate a representativestormwater sediment collection point (SPD-1). SPD-1 was collected with a stainless steel trowel andanalyzed for PCB and PCDD/PCDE

2.2.4 Additional Samples

At the direction of the MDNR, an additional soil sample (SPI-1) was collected from an area identifiedas the location where waste may have been temporarily stored The sample location is shown onFigure 3. SPI-1 was installed through sofl fill with a hand-auger. A sample was collected at a depthof 3 to 3.5 feet bgs and analyzed for PCB. As directed by the MDNR, the boring was backfilled uponcompletion.

BLASLAND, BOUCK ALEE, INC.


Collection of QA/QC samples was done in conjunction with the collection of the samples. The number ofQA/QC samples for this purpose followed the guidelines presented in the QAPP.

"LUS Warehouse Sampling

In anticipation of the warehouse construction at the Simpson Plainwell Mill, on-site testing for PCBwas performed on September 21, October 6, and October 12,1994 at the warehouse construction site.This series of sampling was not included in the scope of the RI/FS as presented in the Work Plan.

A total of 23 soil borings were installed. In addition, two grab samples, and a composite sample werecollected. Thirty-six samples including two duplicates were tested on-site for PCB using EnSysCorporation PCB RISc™ immunoassay test kits. Seven samples were selected and submitted to thelaboratory for Aroclor-specific quantification. Sample locations are shown on Figure 8.

At locations SPG-1, SPG-2, SPG-3, SPW-8 through SPW-19, and SPW-21 surficial (0-0.5 feet bgs)samples were collected. At locations SPW-1 through SPW-7, samples were collected at the 0-0.5,2.0-2.5, and 4.0-4.5 feet bgs depth intervals (45-5.0 for SPW-1 and SPW-2). Grab and composite sampleswere collected from stock-piled soil (from excavation of a water line) at locations SWL-1 throughSWL-3.

Asphalt and concrete were removed prior to soil sampling at locations SPW-12 and SPW-13, andSPW-14 through SPW-17, respectively.

Each immunoassay test kit had a lower screening limit of 1 part per million (ppm). Samples SPG-1through SPG-3, SPW-3 and SPW-4 had an upper screening limit of 25 ppm. Since only one out offour samples in this series had a result greater than (>) 1 ppm and its concentration was also screenedas less than (<) 25 ppm, the 25 ppm interpretation was not completed for SPW-5 through SPW-13.Sample locations SPW-14 through SPW-19, SPW-21, and SWL-1 through SWL-3 had upper screeninglimits of 25 ppm. Sample SPW-6 which had a screening result of >1 ppm was also analyzed for PCBby gas chromatography.

Samples taken from the warehouse construction site were not visually characterized.

2.3 Portage Paper Mill

As directed by the Work Plan, several locations at the Portage Paper Mill were to be sampled to determinethe presence, if any, of PCB associated with the wastewater and process water conveyances. However, thehistorical residuals were removed from the Bryant Clarificr in May 1992. Therefore, when the samplingteam and an MDNR representative visited die property to examine the sampling locations determined inthe Work Plan and the stonnwater catchment area sampling location determined hi Technical Memorandum1, it was observed that there were little historical residuals in the proposed sampling locations. As a result,the MDNR concurred that it was not necessary to collect samples.

, BOUCK A LEE, INC.tSCJENmrS


2.4 Former King Mill

The investigation activities at the former King Mill were performed to determine the presence, if any, ofPC8 associated with the mill's former lagoons and clarifiers, and to assess whether stormwater runoff ordrainage from the 48-inch diameter pipe (which apparently discharged mill wastewater to the KalamazooRiver), are potential contributors of PCB to the Kalamazoo River. In addition, a site drainage analysis wasperformed to assess the nature of surface runoff to storm sewers.

2.4.1 Former Lagoons

A field reconnaissance was performed in the area surrounding the lagoons to visually inspect thelocation of the former lagoons. The ground surface was probed with a hand shovel around thelagoons to determine if residuals were present.

To characterize the nature and extent of the residuals present in the lagoons at the former King Mill,six borings were installed (KM-3 through KM-8) at the locations shown on Figure 5. All borings weresampled continuously for visual characterization. Samples from select depth intervals at locations KM-4 and KM-7 were analyzed for PCB. All samples were collected in the manner prescribed in the FSP.

Upon completion, and as directed by the MDNR, all hand-auger borings were abandoned by replacingthe cuttings into each borehole. The remainder of the borehole annulus was filled with hydratedbentonite. Boring KM-5 was installed with a trailer-mounted rig, and it was abandoned by pumpingthe borehole full with a cement/bentonite (approximately 4 percent bentonite) grout. Cuttingsproduced during the installation of KM-5 were containerized as described hi the HASP, and weretransported to the Allied Paper, Inc. Operable Unit at the end of the field program. All boringlocations were flagged and subsequently surveyed for horizontal and vertical control.

2AJ, Former Wastewater Treatment Structures

To assess the presence of PCB, if any, in the areas near the two razed clarifiers, two borings weredrilled (KM-1 and KM-2) at the locations shown on Figure 5. KM-1 and KM-2 were sampledcontinuously for visual characterization, and KM-2 was sampled at select intervals for PCB analysis.All samples were collected using a hand auger hi the manner prescribed in the FSP. No samples werecollected from the KM-1 location, after concurrence by the MDNR that no evidence of the formerdarifier's location or existence was observed. At KM-2, residuals were not evident; consequently, noresiduals sample was collected.

A grab sample (KMS-1) collected within the outfall of the 48-inch diameter pipe was analyzed forPCB. In addition, the 48-inch diameter pipe was monitored to determine whether it discharged waterduring storm events.

(£eMM BLASLAND, BOUCK A LEE, INC. 10>flM4MN BUniMtfHI * KKHTISTS


2.4.3 Stormwater Conveyance System

A drainage analysis was performed for the former King Mill property to determine the overallstormwater catchment area. A sample was collected at a representative stormwater sedimentcollection point (KMD-1) using a LexanQ tube and a hand pump. The sample was then submittedfor PCB and PCDD/PCDF analysis.

Collection of QA/QC samples was done in conjunction with the collection of the samples. The number ofQA/QC samples for this purpose followed the guidelines presented hi the QAPP.

2.5 Former Monarch Mill•.

To assess the presence of PCB, if any, in former Monarch Mill millrace soils, two borings (MM-1 and MM-2) were installed at the locations shown on Figure 6. These borings were installed to a depth correspondingto the surface elevation of Portage Creek on the north side of Cork Street (approximately 15 feet). Eachboring was sampled continuously with a split-spoon sampler for visual characterization, and at a selectinterval for PCB analysis. All samples were collected in the manner prescribed hi the FSP.

Upon completion, all borings were abandoned by pumping the borehole full with a cement/bentonite(approximately 4 percent bentonite) grout Cuttings produced during the installation of the borings wereplaced into containers as described hi the HASP, and were transported to the Allied Paper, Inc. OperableUnit for storage at the end of the field program. The locations were flagged and subsequently surveyed forhorizontal and vertical control.

Collection of QA/QC samples was done hi conjunction with the collection of the samples. The number ofQA/QC samples for this purpose followed the guidelines presented hi the QAPP.

2.6 King Street Storm Sewer

To characterize the nature and extent of PCB, if any, hi soils in the King Street Storm Sewer area, a totalof 11 soil hand borings (KSHB-1 through KSHB-11) were installed at locations shown on Figure 7. Eightof the borings (KSHB-1 through KSHB-4 and KSHB-8 through KSHB-11) were obtained along the westernside of the inlet where no previous samples had been collected. These borings were advanced to a depthof 3 feet bgs or to the water table, whichever was less. Two samples from boring locations KSHB-1 KSHB-2, KSHB-3, and KSHB-4 were analyzed for PCB. Samples were obtained from the 0- to 0.5-foot bgs intervaland the 0.5-fbot interval below the residuals layer, where present. If no residuals were found, then thedeeper sample was collected from the 1.5- to 2L54bot bgs interval or the 1-foot interval above the watertable.

Borings KSHB-8 through KSHB-11 were collected to determine the extent of residuals, if any, on thewestern side of the inlet. These borings were taken for visual characterization only.

1tMM BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. 11»8S«4W 0WNNBRSA SCIENTISTS


Boring KSHB-5 was obtained to determine the extent of residuals, if any, near the 48-inch diameter pipe.Borings KSHB-6 and KSHB-7 were obtained in the area on the eastern side of the inlet where samples hadpreviously been collected. Each boring was advanced to a depth of 3 feet bgs or to the water table,whichever was less. From each boring, two samples were collected for PCB analyses as follows: one fromthe surficial 0- to 0.5-foot bgs interval, and the other from either the 1.5- to 2.5-foot bgs interval or the 1-foot interval above the water table. The deeper sample from KSHB-5 was analyzed for CLP TCL/IALconstituents.

All samples were obtained utilizing a stainless-steel bucket auger or a stainless-steel scoop. Samplingmethods were performed in accordance with the FSP.

Collection of QA/QC samples was done in conjunction with the collection of the samples. The number ofQA/QC samples for this purpose followed the guidelines presented in the QAPP.

2.7 Sample Collection Methods

The sampling scheme for PCB analysis from borings for the former lagoon locations, in accordance with theWork Plan, was as follows:

• One sample collected from the 0- to 0.5-foot bgs interval;

• One sample collected for every 10-foot interval of residuals between 0.5 feet bgs and theresiduals/native soil interface; and

• One sample collected from the OS- to 2.0-foot interval below the identifiable residuals/native soilinterface.

A summary of the Mill Investigations' residuals/soil/solids samples is presented hi Table 2-2.

A total of 37 borings/cores were installed (22 for analytical purposes) during RI activities at the four mills(Georgia-Pacific, Simpson Plainwell, former King, and former Monarch) and the King Street Storm Sewerarea. From these borings/cores, 13 residuals, 5 residuals/soil, and 34 soil samples were analyzed for PCB.Two grab samples requested by the MDNR, six wastewater-related samples, and three stormwater-relatedsamples were also analyzed for PCB. The three stormwater-related samples were analyzed forPCDD/PCDF, and one soil sample was analyzed for CLP TCL/TAL constituents.

2.8 QA/QC Review of Data

Analytical data reports for the Mill Investigation samples underwent detailed review and evaluation to assessoverall analytical precision and accuracy. Analytical data, organized into sample delivery groups (SDGs),were reviewed using techniques appropriate to the various media and compounds tested Table 2-3 presentsthese SDGs and their associated samples and matrices.

,aaeM BLASLAMD, BOUCK A LEE, INC. 12wSJt4N iMUIHMIU « SCIENTISTS


Laboratory analysis precision was assessed by comparing the analytical results between matrix spike (MS)and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples for organics, and MS and laboratory duplicates for inorganics.Field duplicates were also used and relative percent differences (RPD) were calculated for each pair ofduplicate analyses. To assess the analytical method's accuracy, other indicators such as surrogate spike andblank spike recovery data were also examined.

A precision and accuracy summary, as assessed through the review of QA/QC information includingMS/MSD recovery data, RPD between recoveries, matrix spike blank recovery data, field duplicate RPDcalculation results, surrogate spike recovery data, blank spike recovery data, and blank contaminationdetection, is presented in Appendix B.

A more detailed analysis of data quality can be found in the data review reports presented in Appendix C.Also note that data review procedures derive from applicable USEPA guidance (USEPA, 1989; 1991) andthe QAPP.

Chain-of-Custody records are presented in Appendix D.

BLASLAND.BOUCK&LEE, INC. 134k ACfENnSTS


SECTION 3 - INVESTIGATION RESULTS3.1 Field Data

The media sampled and observed during the Mill Investigations included soil, solids, sediment, and residuals.Tables 3-1 through 3-5 present field data summaries for the mills and the King Street Storm Sewer area.Field notes documenting the field activities and observations are provided in Appendix A.


Field data to characterize the extent of residuals in the former lagoons were collected during theinvestigation by conducting a field reconnaissance and installing borings and cores. Six borings andtwo cores (GPL-1 through GPL-7 and GPL-2A) were completed hi the lagoons (Figure 2). Visualobservations of the subsurface materials to characterize the residuals, fill, and native soil were usedto generate subsurface logs for each boring and core. The subsurface logs are presented in AppendixE. Samples obtained from the wastewater treatment structures (GPC-1), the stormwater conveyances(GPD-1) and a pile of gypsum-like substance (GPP-1) were grab samples; therefore, a visualcharacterization of the subsurface profile could not be logged

Residuals were found hi four of the six borings and both cores at the Georgia-Pacific Mill property.Borings GPL-2B and GPL-6 did not encounter residuals. The thickness of the residuals ranged from0.3 to 4.5 feet The maximum depth of residuals was observed at 4.5 feet bgs. The maximum depthand thickness of 4.5 feet was observed at the western end of the former Lagoon 3 at boring locationGPL-3. Evidently, during the process of removing the residuals from the former lagoon, a slightmounding resulted at the western end of the lagoon. Therefore, when boring GPL-3 was advanced,4.5 feet of residuals were encountered. Residuals, according to the Burmistcr Soil ClassificationSystem, were generally characterized as grey day material with "little" (10 to 20 percent) to "some"(20 to 35 percent) paper fibers. The residuals were generally homogeneous with little variation incolor or texture. The residuals were collected with either a hand-auger or Lexan® tubing, and weredescribed as soft

In general, native soil underlying the residuals is characteried as brown fine sand with a trace (<10percent) of silt, or silt with a trace of fine sand.

Soil probing indicates that residuals extend westward beyond the original berms of former Lagoons1,2, and 3.

Table 3-1 presents a summary of field data collected at the Georgia-Pacific Mill property.

3.1.2 Simpson Plainwell Mill

Field data to characterize the extent of residuals in the former lagoons at the Simpson Plainwell Millproperty were collected during the investigation. Thirteen borings (SPL-1 through SPL-5, and SPL-7through SPL-13) were completed in the former lagoons (Figure 3). SPL-6 was completed in the

BLASLAND, BOUCK 4 LEE, INC. 14ASCIENTOTS


former aeration basin. Visual observations of the subsurface materials to characterize the residuals,fill, and native soil were used to generate subsurface logs for each boring. The subsurface logs arepresented in Appendix E. Samples taken from the former wastewater treatment structures (SPC-1and SPC-2), stonnwater conveyances (SPD-1) and the area where wastes may have been temporarilystored (SPI-1) were grab samples; therefore, a visual characterization of the subsurface profile couldnot be logged.

Residuals were found in 11 of the 13 borings installed in the former lagoons. Boring SPL-5 (LagoonK) and SPL-12 (Lagoon D) did not encounter residuals. Residuals, where found, range up to 10.5feet in thickness. Residuals were observed to a maximum depth of 18 feet bgs (Table 3-2). Noresiduals were observed in the former aeration basin (SPL-6). Residuals, according to the BurmisterSoil Classification System were generally characterized as grey clay material with little" (10 to 20percent) to "some" (20 to 35 percent) paper fibers. The residuals were generally homogeneous withlittle variation in color or texture. Blow counts taken during split-spoon sampling were lowthroughout the entire thickness of residuals, and ranged between weight of rods (WOR) or weight ofhammer (WOH) to 1 or 2 blows per inch (N "Value = 1).

A fine to coarse sand and a brown and black fill were observed above the residuals layers. The fillmaterial was also found mixed in with the residuals. The fill consists of various amounts of fine tocoarse sand, gravel, silt, and coal ash.

The native soil underlying the residuals and fill is characterized as a grey to black fine to coarse sand.

Table 3-2 presents a summary of the field data collected at the Simpson Plainwell Mill property.

3.1 J Portage Paper Mill

As described in the Work Plan, samples were to be collected at the Portage Paper Mill property,however, because the historical residuals were removed prior to the mill being re-activated, theMDNR concurred that it was not necessary to collect samples.


Field data to characterize the extent of residuals in the former King Mill lagoons were collectedduring the investigation by conducting field reconnaissance and installing borings. Six borings (KM-3through KM-8) were completed hi the area of the former lagoons, and two borings (KM-1 and KM-2)were installed in the area of the former darifiers (Figure 5). Visual observations of the subsurfacematerials to characterize the residuals, fill, and native soil were used to generate subsurface logs foreach boring. The subsurface logs are presented in Appendix E. Samples collected from thestonnwater conveyance system (KMD-1) and from the 48-inch diameter pipe (KMS-1) were notvisually characterized.

To determine whether the 48-inch diameter pipe discharged water to the Kalamazoo River, the pipewas inspected the morning of June 13,1994 approximately 5 hours into a major rainfall event The

BLASLAND, BOUCK ft LEE, INC. 15t scaamsTs


inspection was conducted by removing die manhole cover on East Vine Street (Figure 5). The pipewas inspected before the rainfall event and it was observed that the manhole was dry. After therainfall event it was again observed that the manhole was dry, indicating that the pipe did not conveywater to the aver during the major precipitation event.

Residuals were observed in all six of die borings installed hi the former lagoons. The thickness of theresiduals ranged from 03 to 9.5 feet The maximum depth of residuals was found at 9.5 feet bgs. Noresiduals were observed in the area of the former clarifiers. Residuals, according to the BurmisterSoil Classification System, were generally characterized as grey clay material with little" (10 to 20percent) to "some" (20-35 percent) paper fibers.

At boring locations KM-3, KM-4, KM-6, and KM-8, residuals were observed at the ground surface.At boring locations KM-5 and KM-7, a dark brown silt and a grey/brown day, respectively, wereobserved above the residuals layer. No residuals were observed at locations KM-1 and KM-2.

The native soil underlying the residuals in the area of the former lagoons is generally characterizedas brown fine sand and silt layers.

The ground surface around the lagoons was probed with a hand shovel to determine the extent ofsurficial residuals outside the lagoon perimeters. It was observed that residuals did not extend beyondthe estimated borders of Lagoon NS. The surficial residuals in the area of Lagoon EW were observedto extend outside the lagoon's estimated original borders to the north and east, and approaching theGrand Trunk Railroad.

Table 3-3 presents a summary of field data collected at the former King Mill property.


Field data to characterize the former mfllrace soils were collected during the investigation. Twoborings (MM-1 and MM-2) were installed (Figure 6). Visual observations of the subsurface materialsto characterize the materials encountered in die former millrace were used to generate subsurface logsfor each boring. The subsurface togs are presented in Appendix E.

Residuals were found hi one of die two borings. At boring location MM-1 residuals were observedfrom 11.0 to 11.5 feet bgs. Residuals, according to die Burmister Classification System, were generallycharacterized as grey day material wim Tlttie" (10 to 20 percent) to "some" (20 to 35 percent) paperfibers.

Miscellaneous soil and demolition fill materials were found to depdis of 10 to 12 feet Formermillrace soils were identified immediately below die fill materials and consisted of coarse soils witiisome organic matter. The former millrace soft layer was observed to be approximately 0.5- to 1-footthick; below this layer is a fine gravel layer overlying native soils consisting of sflty sands.

Table 3-4 presents a summary of die field data collected at die former Monarch Mfll property.

BOUCK&LEE, INC. 16tacioman



Tb characterize the extent of residuals, if any, and soils in the King Street Storm Sewer area, 11 soilhand borings (KSHB-1 through KSHB-11) were installed at locations shown on Figure 7. The fielddata included the visual observation of the subsurface materials.

Grey clayey soils with fibers, which may indicate residuals, were observed in eight of the elevenborings. Borings KSHB-3, KSHB-4, and KSHB-S did not encounter these soils. The grey clayey soilshad a thickness of 1.0 to 2.5 feet, and were observed at a maximum depth of 3.0 feet bgs.

The King Street Storm Sewer area soils include fine sands, silts, and days with some organic matter.

Table 3-5 presents a summary of the field data collected at the King Street Storm Sewer area.

3.2 Analytical Data


The results of PCB and PCDD/PCDF analyses of Georgia-Pacific Mill property residuals/soil samplesare presented in Table 3-6 and Table 3-7, respectively, and on Figure 9.

PCB were detected in four of five surfldal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) samples collected in the former lagoons.Detected total PCB concentrations range from an estimated 020 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) atGPL-3 to 110 mg/kg at GPL-1. The average of the detected total PCB concentrations is 31 mg/kg.PCB were not detected in the surfidal sample at GPL-4.

PCB were detected hi the three subsurface residuals samples collected in the former lagoons. TotalPCB concentrations are 53 mg/kg, 70 mg/kg. and 3.4 mg/kg in samples from GPL-2, GPL-3, and GPL-5, respectively.

PCB were detected in the five native soil samples collected in the former lagoons. Total PCBconcentrations range from an estimated 0.043 mg/kg at GPL-5 to an estimated 2.9 mg/kg at GPL-1.The average total PCB concentration is 1.1 mg/kg.

The total PCB concentration of the wastewater-related sample (GPC-1) collected from the formerprimary clarifier is an estimated 0.15 mg/kg.

The total PCB concentration of the stormwater-related sample (GPD-1) is 0.65 mg/kg.

The total PCB concentration of the sample from a pile of gypsum-like substance near Lagoon 3 (GPP-1) is 0.15 mg/kg.

PCDD/PCDF were detected in the stormwater-related sample (GPD-1). 23,7,8-Tetrachlorinateddibenzo-p-diorin (23,7,8-TCDD) was not detected. 23,7,8-letrachlorinated dibenzofuran (23,7,8-

fMMM BLASLAMD, BOUCK A LEE, INC. 17fflmtitf MMMHBtt A SCIENTISTS


TCDF) was detected at a concentration of 2.9E-6 mg/kg. Hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorinatedPCDD/PCDF congeners were also detected in the sample.


The results of PCB and PCDD/PCDF analyses of Simpson Plainwell Mill property residuals/soil/solidssamples are presented in Table 3-8 and liable 3-9, respectively, and on Figure 10.

PCB were detected in two of five surfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) samples collected in the former lagoons.The total PCB concentration of the SPL-2 sample is an estimated 0.040 mg/kg. The total PCBconcentration of the SPL-11 sample is an estimated 0.038 mg/kg. PCB were not detected in thesurficial samples from SPL-1, SPL-4, and SPL-13.

PCB were detected in the five subsurface residuals samples collected hi the former lagoons. TotalPCB concentrations range from 0.11 mg/kg at SPL-13 to an estimated 1.6 mg/kg at SPL-11. Theaverage total PCB concentration is 0.74 mg/kg.

PCB were detected in the five native soil samples collected in the former lagoons. Total PCBconcentrations range from an estimated 0.025 mg/kg at SPL-2, to an estimated 0.12 mg/kg at SPL-1.The average total PCB concentration is 0.067 mg/kg.

PCB were detected in the surficial (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) sample collected in the former aeration basinarea (SPL-6) at a total PCB concentration of 027 mg/kg. PCB were not detected in the samplecollected from the 2- to 4-foot bgs interval.

PCB were detected in the solids samples collected from the area of the razed primary darifier, aformer pipe, an area where wastes .may have been temporarily stored, and the representative mfllstormwater catchment area. SPC-1, collected from the area of the razed primary darifier, had a totalPCB concentration of 0.74 mg/kg. SPC-2, collected from the end of a former discharge pipe that hadhistorically conveyed process water to the Kalamazoo River, had a total PCB concentration of 240mg/kg. SPI-1, collected from an area where wastes may have been temporarily stored, had a totalPCB concentration of 1.4 mg/kg. The SPD-1 sediment sample collected from the locationrepresentative of the stormwater reHHBttPt area had a total PCB concentration of 3.9 mg/kg. Thissample was taken from a manhole that also had formerly handled process wastewater.

The EnSys Corporation PCB RISc™ immunoassay results from the soil samples taken at thewarehouse construction site are presented in Table 3-10, and on Figure 11.

Seven out of the 36 sample PCB results at the warehouse construction site were >1 ppm (SPW-3,SPW-3" (duplicate), SPW-5, SPW-6, SFW-7, SPW-8, and SPW-9); PCB detections were only in thesurfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) soil layers. The remaining samples were <1 ppm.

BOUCKALEE, INC. 19• •oomara


In order to quantity the "greater than 1 ppm* detection at SPW-6, the surficial (0-0.5 feet bgs) soilsample was submitted for laboratory analysis for PCB. The analytical result, as reported by thelaboratory, indicates that PCB were detected at a total PCB concentration of 1.8 mg/kg.

PCDD/PCDFwere detected hi the stormwater-related sample (SPD-1). 23,7,8-TCDD was detectedat a concentration of 5.1E-5 mg/kg. 23»7,8TCDF was detected at a concentration of 6.5E-4 mg/kg.Penta-, hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorinated PCDD/PCDF congeners were also detected.

3.2.3 Portage Paper Mill

As described hi the Work Plan, samples were to be collected at the Portage Paper Mill to assess thepresence, if any, of PCB associated with the process water and stormwater conveyances to PortageCreek. However, because the historical residuals were removed from the Bryant Clarifier prior to themill being re-activated, the MDNR concurred that it was not necessary to collect samples.

3.2.4 Former King MiU

The results of PCB and PCDD/PCDF analyses of former King Mill residuals/soil samples arepresented in Table 3-11 and Table 3-12, respectively, and on Figure 12.

PCB were detected hi one of two surficial (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) samples from the former lagoons. KM-7had a total PCB concentration of 79 mg/kg, with 60 mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1242 and 19 mg/kgquantified as Arodor 1248. PCB were not detected hi the KM-4 sample. The subsurface residualssample from KM-7 had a total PCB concentration of 34 mg/kg, quantified as Arodor 1242. Thenative soil sample had a total PCB concentration of 1.2 mg/kg, quantified as Arodor 1242.

PCB were not detected hi the native sofl sample from location KM-4.

The surficial (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) sofl sample from sampling location KM-2, collected hi the formerclarifier B, had a total PCB concentration of 0.43 mg/kg. PCB were not detected hi the deeper (3.5to 4.0 feet bgs) soil sample from ««™pHffg location KM-2.

Sample KMS-1, collected from the 48-inch diameter pipe, had a total PCB concentration of 5.8 mg/kg,with 4.7 mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1254 and 1.1 mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1260. The duplicatesample total PCB concentration was 92 mg/kg, with 7.6 mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1254 and 1.6mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1260.

The stormwater-related sample (KMD-1) had a total PCB concentration of 0.17 mg/kg, with 0.070mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1248, 0.063 mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1254, and an estimated 0.041mg/kg quantified as Arodor 1260.

PCDD/PCDFwere detected hi the stormwater-related sample (KMD-1) and its duplicate. 23,7,8-TCDD was detected at a concentration of 9.8E-6 mg/kg hi the sample and 9.6E-6 mg/kg hi theduplicate. 2,3,7,8-TCDF was detected at a concentration of 2.1E-5 mg/kg hi the sample and 2.1E-6

BLASUHD.BOUCK ALEE, INC. 19


mg/kg in the duplicate. Penta-, hexa-, hepta-, and octachlorinated PCDD/PCDF congeners were alsodetected in the sample.

3^5 Former Monarch Mill

The results of PCB analysis of former Monarch Mill residuals/soil samples are presented in lable 3-13and on Figure 13.

In the former millrace, a residuals sample was collected from boring location MM-1, and a soil samplewas collected from boring location MM-2; PCB were not detected in the two samples.


The results of PCB analysis of King Street Storm Sewer area soils are presented in lable 3-14 andon Figure 14. The results of the CLP TCL/TAL constituent analyses in soil are presented in lable3-15 (TCL) and Table 3-16 (TAL).

Total PCB concentrations in the surfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) samples range from 037 mg/kg at KSHB-1to 11 mg/kg at KSHB-6. The average detected concentration is 42 mg/kg. Total PCB concentrationsin the deeper (greater than 0.5 feet bgs) soil samples ranged from 1.8 mg/kg at KSHB-1 to 32 mg/kgat KSHB-3. The average total PCB concentration is 9.0 mg/kg.

The 1.5 to 2J feet bgs soil sample at boring location KSHB-5 was also analyzed for TCL [volatileorganic compounds (VOCs), semivolatfle organic compounds (SVOCs), and pesticides] constituents,and TAL analytes. Two VOCs, vinyl chloride and acetone, were detected at estimated concentrationsof 0.008 mg/kg and 0.015 mg/kg, respectively. Sixteen SVOCs and four pesticides were detected inthe sample. Eighteen TAL analytes were detected, however, seven of the analytes (barium, beryllium,cobalt, nickel, potassium, selenium, and vanadium) were also detected in the laboratory blank.

BLAStMtD,BOUCKALEE, INC. 20A »CIENTOTS


SECTION 4 - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS4.1 Field Data

Field data were collected regarding the presence, if any, and extent of residuals at the mill properties andthe King Street Storm Sewer. Each property is discussed below.


In the mill's five former lagoons, borings indicate that residuals are present at depths up to 4.5 feetbgs. Where present, the thickness of the residuals ranges from 03 to 4.5 feet Hie maximum depthand thickness of 4.5 feet was observed at the western end of the former lagoon at boring locationGPL-3. Evidently, during the process of removing the residuals from the former lagoon, a slightmounding resulted at the western end of the lagoon. Therefore, when boring GPL-3 was advanced,4.5 feet of residuals were encountered.

In general, the residuals overlie a native soil consisting of brown fine sand with traces of silts or siltwith trace fine sands. Solids are present in the former primary darifier and at the representativestormwater conveyance sampling location (GPD-1). Soil probing around the lagoons indicatesresiduals extend to the west beyond the original berms of Lagoons 1,2, and 3.


At the Simpson Plainwell Mill, residuals are present in ten of the 12 former lagoons sampled, atdepths up to 10.5 feet bgs. The boring drilled in the former aeration basin (SPL-6) did not containresiduals. Solids are present at the end of a former discharge pipe (SPC-2), and at the representativestormwater conveyance sampling location (SPD-1). The razed secondary darifier did not containsolids.

A fine to coarse sand and a brown and blade fill were observed above and below the residuals layers.Fill was also mixed in with the residuals and consisted of sand, gravel, silt, and coal ash. The nativesoil underlying the residuals is characterized as sand.

4.13 Portage Paper Mill

No sampling was required at the Portage Paper Mill; refer to sections 23,3.13, and 3.23 for a moredetailed discussion.


At the former King Mill, residuals are present hi the two lagoons at depths from 03 feet bgs to amaximum of 9.5 feet bgs. No residuals were observed near the two former darifiers. Solids wereobserved in the 48-inch diameter pipe (KMS-1). Residuals were also observed at the sofl surfaceoutside of Lagoon EW.

IMaM BLASLAND, BOUCK A LEE, INC. 21fMMMM CNOMHBMASCKNflSTS


The native soil underlying the lagoons is comprised of layers of sand and silt

There was no flow in the 48-inch diameter former wastewater pipe (KMS-1) during a wet-weatherevent, indicating that the pipe does not convey water toward the river during either dry or wetweather.


At the former Monarch Mill, a thin layer (less than 0.5 feet thick) of residuals are present in one ofthe two mUlrace borings at a depth of 11.0 to 11.5 feet bgs. Miscellaneous soil and demolition fillmaterials are present above the residuals.


At the King Street Storm Sewer, residuals were evident in eight of the 11 cores. The thickness ofresiduals hi the cores range from 1.0 to 25 feet Residuals were not observed hi cores KSHB-3,KSHB-4, and KSHB-S, located on the western side of the outfall area. KSHB-5 is located near theend of the 48-inch diameter pipe.

4.2 Analytical Data

This section presents a preliminary evaluation of the analytical data collected from each mill and the KingStreet Storm Sewer in terms of frequency of FCB detection and range of concentration. These data arescreened against the MDNR Type B and Generic Industrial Type C criteria. The MDNR Type B criteriaused in this preliminary screening process are conservative (health protective) and generic. For example,Type B criteria for direct contact with son assume that both dermal contact and ingestion occur on a dailybasis for life. Ingestion is assumed to occur at a rate of 0.09 grams per day times an adsorption factor of50 percent for FOB and PCDD/PCDF. Dermal absorption is assumed to occur at a rate of 0.9 grams perday times an adsorption factor of one percent. Site-specific information on the actual and potential usesof the mill properties and vicinity will be considered when the human health and ecological risk assessmentsare conducted. This screening evaluation using generic human-health based criteria is not intended toreplace site-specific risk assessment, but rather to provide a basis for current decision-making regarding theneed for further investigation.

In general, there are three categories of the MDNR Type B and Generic Industrial Type C criteria forcompounds in soil. Two of these categories are intended to protect groundwater and surface water, and arebased on 20-times the drinking water standard and 20-times the groundwater/surface water interface (GSI)value, respectively. The GSI is the criterion used by the MDNR to assess influences of groundwaterdischarge from Act 307 sites to surface waters.

The third category, the direct contact value, b based on human exposure to soil via ingestion and dermalcontact For purposes of screening these data, all results are compared to direct contact values. In the caseof the stormwater-related samples, the sampling was conducted to assess stonnwater conveyances aspotential PCB and PCDD/PCDF pathways to the Kalamazoo River. Therefore, sediments within the

M UCK A LEE, INC.


conveyances that may come in direct contact with surface water runoff from the surficial soils of the millproperties were sampled and analyzed for the presence, if any, of these constituents, and the results thenscreened against Type B and Type C direct contact criteria. Although these criteria are based upon directcontact exposure and risk estimates, they are relevant to the surface runoff pathway since they representconstituent levels that would be acceptable for surficial soils hi the environment that could come in contactwith surface runoff.

Soil sample TAL analyte concentrations from die King Street Storm Sewer (KSHB-5 sample only) are alsoscreened against MDNR Default Type A cleanup criteria. The Default Type A criteria are representativeof naturally occurring background concentrations of TAL analytes hi soil. The criteria are derived by theMDNR based on analysis of the 1991 Michigan Background Soil Survey (MDNR, 1993).

4.2.1 Georgia-Pacific Mill .

A summary of detected PCB concentrations and MDNR cleanup criteria is presented in Table 4-1.For comparison, the MDNR Type B and Generic Industrial Type C criteria based on direct contactexposure are presented.

In the former lagoons, PCB were detected in four of the five surficial (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) residuals/soilsamples. Total PCB concentrations for three of the samples (GPL-1, GPL-2, and GPL-5) exceed theType B direct contact value of 1.0 mg/kg, and one total PCB concentration (GPL-1) exceeds theGeneric Industrial Type C direct contact value of 7.5 mg/kg. The former lagoon surfidal residuals/soiltotal PCB concentrations range from not detected to 110 mg/kg, and the average total PCBconcentration is 24 mg/kg.

In the former lagoons, PCB were detected in the five native soil samples. Two of the samples (GPL-2and GPL-4) exceed the Type B direct contact value; however, the GPL-4 duplicate did not exceed thecriteria. All five native soil sample total PCB concentrations do not exceed the Generic IndustrialType C direct contact value. Ibtal PCB concentrations for the former lagoon native soil samplesrange from 0.043 mg/kg to 2.9 mg/kg, and the average total PCB concentration is 1.1 mg/kg.

The total PCB concentration (0.15 mg/kg) of the wastewater-related sample from the former darifier(GPC-1) does not exceed the Type B or die Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values.

The total PCB concentration (0.65 mg/kg) of the stormwater-related sample (GPD-1) does not exceedthe Type B or the Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values.

The total PCB concentration (0.15 mg/kg) of the additional grab sample (GPP-1), taken at theMDNR's request from the pile of gypsum-like material, does not exceed the Type B or the GenericIndustrial Type C direct contact values.

A summary of PCDD/PCDF concentrations, including the calculated TCDD equivalents for eachcongener and relevant MDNR criteria is presented hi Table 4-2. For comparison, the MDNR TypeB and Generic Industrial Type C deanup criteria based on direct contact exposure are also presented.

BLASLAND, BOUCK * LEE, INC. 23


For risk screening purposes, PCDD/PCDF concentrations are converted to TCDD equivalents andthe results compared to the TCDD-based criteria. The TCDD equivalent concentration (2.8E-6mg/kg) in the stormwater-related sample (GPD-1) does not exceed the Type B or Generic IndustrialType C direct contact criteria of 13E-5 mg/kg and 2.0E-4 mg/kg, respectively.


A summary of detected PCB concentrations and MDNR cleanup criteria is presented in Table 4-3.For comparison, the MDNR Type B and Generic Industrial Type C criteria based on direct contactexposure are presented.

In the former lagoons, PCB were detected in two of the five surfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) residuals/soilsamples; however, the total PCB concentrations do not exceed the Type B or the Generic IndustrialType C direct contact values. The average total PCB concentration for the former lagoon surfidalresiduals/soil samples is 0.031 mg/kg.

In the former lagoons, PCB were detected in the five native soil samples; however, the total PCBconcentrations do not exceed the Type B or the Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values. Theaverage total PCB concentration for the former lagoon native soil samples is 0.067 mg/kg.

The total PCB concentration (027 mg/kg) of the surfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) sample from the formeraeration basin (SPL-6) does not exceed die Type B or Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values.PCB were not detected in the former aeration basin native soil sample.

PCB were detected in the three wastewater-related samples. Total PCB concentrations are 0.74mg/kg, 240 mg/kg, and 1.4 mg/kg for samples from locations SPC-1, SPC-2, and SPI-1, respectively.Total PCB concentrations for two of the three samples (SPC-2 and SPI-1) exceed the Type B directcontact value. The SPC-2 sample, collected from the end of a former discharge pipe that hadhistorically conveyed process water to the Kalamazoo River, exceeds the Generic Industrial Type Cdirect contact value.

The total PCB concentration (3.9 mg/kg) of the stormwater-related sample (SPD-1) exceeds the TypeB direct contact value, but does not exceed die Generic Industrial Type C direct contact value. Thissample was taken from a manhole mat also had formerly handled process wastewater.

Based on field screening using EoSys Corporation PCB RISc™ immunoassay test kits, PCBconcentrations at the warehouse construction site are below 1 ppm except for sampling locations SPW-3, SPW-3" (duplicate), SPW-5, SPW-6, SPW-7, SPW-8, and SPW-9. The soil samples at locationsSWP-1, SWP-2, and SPW-6 were analyzed by the laboratory (surifidal sample only for SPW-6). Theanalytical results, as reported by the laboratory, indicate that PCB were detected at an averageconcentration of 037 mg/kg. The surifidal sample from SPW-6 had a reported total PCBconcentration of 1.8 mg/kg, which exceeds die Type B direct contact value; however, it is below theGeneric Industrial Type C direct contact value.

BLftSUMP, BOUCKA LEE, INC, 24A


A summary of PCDD/PCDF concentrations induding the calculated TCDD equivalents for eachcongner and relevant MDNR criteria is presented hi Table 4-4. For comparison, the MDNR TypeB and Generic Industrial Type C cleanup criteria based on direct contact exposure are also presented.For risk screening purposes, PCDD/PCDF concentrations are converted to TCDD equivalents andthe results compared to the TCDD-based criteria. The TCDD equivalent concentration (6.0E-4mg/kg) of the stormwater-related sample (SPD-1) exceeds the Type B and Generic Industrial TypeC direct contact criteria of 1.3E-5 mg/kg and 2.0E4 mg/kg, respectively.


A summary of detected PCB concentrations and MDNR cleanup criteria is presented hi Table 4-5.For comparison, the MDNR Type B and Generic Industrial Type C criteria based on direct contactexposure are also presented.

In the former lagoons, PCB were detected in one of the two surficial (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) samples. Thetotal PCB concentration (79 mg/kg) of the sample from location KM-7 exceeds both the Type B andthe Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values. PCB were not detected in the surfidal samplefrom the KM-4 location.

In the lagoons, PCB were detected hi one of the two native soil samples. The total PCBconcentration (12 mg/kg) of the sample from the KM-7 location exceeds the Type B direct contactvalue, but not die Generic Industrial Type C direct contact value. PCB were not detected in the KM-2 native soil sample.

The average total PCB concentration of two duplicate samples from the 48-inch diameter pipe (KMS-1) is 7.5 mg/kg, and therefore exceeds die Type B direct contact value, but does not exceed theGeneric Industrial Type C direct contact value. During a wet weather event, there was no flow hi thepipe.

The total PCB concentration (0.43 mg/kg) of the surfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) wastewater-related samplecollected at KM-2 hi the area of former Qarifier B does not exceed Type B or Generic IndustrialType C criteria. No PCB were detected in the native soil 3.5- to 4.0-foot bgs interval sample at KM-2.

The total PCB concentration (0.17 mg/kg) of the stormwater-related sample (KMD-1) does not exceedthe Type B or the Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values.

A summary of PCDD/PCDF concentrations induding the calculated TCDD equivalents for eachcongener and relevant MDNR criteria is presented hi Table 4-6. For comparison, the MDNR TypeB and Generic Industrial Type C cleanup criteria based on direct contact exposure are also presented.For risk screening purposes, PCDD/PCDF concentrations are converted to TCDD equivalents andthe results compared to the TCDD-based criteria. The total TCDD equivalent concentration (2.1E-5mg/kg) hi the stormwater-related sample from KMD-1 exceeds the Type B direct contact criteria of13E-5 mg/kg, but does not exceed the Generic Industrial Type C value of 2.0E-4 mg/kg.

tieaM BLASLAHD, BOUCK & LEE, INC. 25NM4MN IMCMMBRtASCIEMnsrS



A summary of detected PCB concentrations and MDNR cleanup criteria is presented in lable 4-7.For comparison, the MDNR Type B and die Generic Industrial Type C criteria based on directcontact exposure are also presented.

PCB were not detected in the samples collected at the former Monarch Mill (MM-1 and MM-2).Samples were not analyzed for PCDD/PCDF.


A summary of detected PCB concentrations and MDNR cleanup criteria is presented in lable 4-8.For comparison, the MDNR 'type B and the Generic Industrial "type C criteria based on directcontact exposure are also presented.

PCB were detected in the seven surfidal (0 to 0.5 feet bgs) residuals/soil samples. Five of the totalPCB concentrations of samples from KSHB-2, KSHB-3, KSHB-4, KSHB-6, and KSHB-7 exceed thelype B direct contact value. However, only the KSHB-6 sample total PCB concentration exceeds theGeneric Industrial "type C direct contact value. The average total PCB concentration is 4.2 mg/kg.

The sample collected from the IS- to 25-foot bgs interval at boring location KSHB-5 was alsoanalyzed for CLP TCL/TAL constituents. A summary of detected TCL concentrations and cleanupcriteria is presented in lable 4-9. For comparison, the MDNR Type B and Generic Industrial TypeC criteria based on direct contact exposure are also presented.

Two VOCs (vinyl chloride and acetone) were detected at concentrations of 0.008 mg/kg and 0.015mg/kg respectively; however, the concentrations do not exceed their Type B or Generic IndustrialType C direct contact values.

Sixteen SVOCs were detected in the sample; however, only three SVOCs [benzo(b)fiuoranthene,benzo(a)pyrene, and dibenzo(aji)anthracene] exceed their Type B direct contact values, and no SVOCconcentrations exceed their Generic Industrial Type C direct contact values.

Four pesticides were detected (aldrin, alpha-chlordane, gamma-chlordane, and 4,4'-DDE) in thesample; however, the sample concentrations do not exceed then- Type B or Generic Industrial TypeC direct contact values.

A summary of detected TAL concentrations and MDNR criteria is presented in lable 4-10. Forcomparison, the MDNR Type B criteria based on direct contact exposure, and the Default Type Acriteria based on soil cleanup values are also presented.

Eighteen TAL anarytes were detected in the sample. Eight of the detected analytes (arsenic, barium,cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, and selenium) exceed their Type A soil cleanup criteria;however, only one of the anarytes (arsenic) exceeds its Type B direct contact value.

BLASLAHD, BOUCK & LEE, INC. 26


4.3 Conclusions

Based on the preliminary evaluation of the field and analytical data collected during the remedialinvestigations, the primary conclusions are summarized as follows:

• The results of the Georgia-Pacific Mill Investigation indicate the need to further assess the extentof residuals within the eastern end of the three former lagoons located in the northwest corner ofthe property, as well as to the west of the lagoons. No additional response to the data collectedat other locations is necessary.

• The results of the Simpson Plainwell Mill Investigation indicate the need to further assess whetherthe sediment in the sampled storm-sewer manhole (SPD-1) represents current or historicdeposition. Mill records indicate, however, that many years ago the storm sewer discharged processwater. Although the former deinking plant pipe is no longer active, the need to cap an area whichincludes the pipe, due to the potential for flood damage, will involve a response to the observationof PCB hi the residue solids contained in the pipe. No other responses to the data are indicatedfor the lagoons or former wastewater treatment facilities.

• The results of the former King Mill Investigation indicate the need for additional sampling in andaround the EW lagoon to further assess the extent of residuals outside of the lagoon, and to obtainsufficient information regarding PCB levels for addressing potential remedial needs or alternativeshi the RI/FS. The PCB levels seen in die EW lagoon contrast with the lack of detection of PCBin the NS lagoon. Thus, the need for additional characterization of PCB levels hi the residuals hithe NS lagoon is also indicated. No additional response is indicated to address the area of theformer darifiers or stormwater drainage.

• No additional response is necessary at the former Monarch Mill.

• The combination of historic and current data for the King Street Storm Sewer area appearsufficient to complete the assessment of this area in the RI/FS.

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. 27


REFERENCESBlasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C., Allied Paper. Inc./Portagc Creek/Kalamazoo River Supcrfund SiteDescription of the Current Situation. (Syracuse, NY: July 1992).

Blasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C.. Allied Paper. Ino/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Supcrfund Site Healthand Safety Plan.(Syracuse. NY: June 1993a).

Blasland & Bouck Engineers, PC., Allied Paper. Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Supcrfund SiteRemedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Work Han. (Syracuse. NY: July 1993b).

Blasland & Bouck Engineers, PC., Allied Paper. Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteRemedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Field sampling PlanT (Syracuse. NY; July 1993c).

Blasland & Bouck Engineers, PC., Allied Paper. ^ncT/fortage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteQuality Assurance Project Plan. (Syracuse, NY: July 1993d).

Blasland Bouck & Lee, Inc., Technical Memonm^fm 1 - Mill Investigation/Proposed Stormwater SedimentSampling Locations. (Syracuse, NY: February 1994).

MDNR, MERA Operational Memorandum #15: Default TVpe A Cleanup Criteria. September 30, 1993.

MDNR, MERA Operational Memorandum #8: Revision 3: 1Vpe B Criteria. February 4, 1994a.

MDNR, Addendum to MERA Operational MeIDoranf%ft #& Revision 3: Type B Criteria. June 21, 1994b.

MDNR, MERA Operational Memorandum lt*14- Revision 2; Generic Remedial Action Plans UsingGeneric Industrial or Generic Commercial CleiMHTP Criteria and Other Requirements for TVpe C RemedialAction Plan. June 21, 1994c.

USEPA, Laboratory Data \folidation: Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analysis (Draft).Hazardous Site Evaluation Division, (October, 1989).

USEPA, National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review (Draft). Contract Laboratory Program,December 1990, revised June 1991.

BLASLAND, BOUCK ALEE, INC. 28

CD(0

TABLE 2-1

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAQE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

DRAFT FORSTATE ANDFEDERALREVIEW

MILL INVESTIGATIONSUSEPA CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM-TARGET COM POUND LIST/TARGET ANALYTE LIST

TARQETCbMPbUNbtiSt

VOC»acetonebenzenebromodichloromethanabromoformbromomethane2-butanonecarbon disuffidecarbon tetraohlorldechlorobenzenechloroethanechloroform

chloromethanedibromochloromethane1.1-dchlorodhan*1.2-dfohloroethane1.1 - dlchloroethene1,2-dlchloroetheM (total)1,2-dichk>ro propanecle-1,3-dichloropropenetrane— 1,3—dtohtorepropeneethylbenzene2-hexanone

methytene chloride4—methyl—2— pentanone•tyrene1,1,2,2 — tatrachktroethanetetrachloroethenetoluene1.1.1-trichloroethana1.1.2-trlchk>roethanetrichloroethenevinyl chloridexytenee (totaQ_______

SVOC«acenaphtheneacenaphthyleneanthracenebenzo(a) anthracenebenzo(b)fluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenebenzo(g,h,i)perylenebenzo(a)pyrene

—bromophenyl phenyl ether-benzyl phthalate

carbazole4-chloroanllnebi«(2-chk>roethoxy) methaneble(2-chloroethyQ ether4-ch(oro-3-methyl phenol2-chk>ranaphthalene2-chtero phenol4—chlorophenyl phenyl ether2,2>-oxybia(1 -ohloro propane)chyreene

dlbenzo(a.h) anthracenedlbenzofurandi-n-butylpMhatate1 ,2-dichlorobenzene1 ,3- dlchloro benzene1,4-dichlorobenzene3.3'-dlchlorobenzldme2,4-dichlorophenoldiethyl phthalate2,4-dlmethylphenol4.6-dlnhro-2-methy« phenol

2,4-dlnltro phenol2.4-dinltrotehiene2,6-dlnltrotoluenedl-n-octyl phthalatebl«(2-ethlyhexy9ph«Mlatefluoranthenefluorenehexachlorobenzenehexaohlorobutadtomhexachloroovolopentadlene

hexachloroethanelndeno(1 .3-leophorone2—methylnaphthalene2— methyl phenol4-methyiphenolnaphthalene2-nHroanllne3-nHroanllne4-nHroanllnenitrobenzene2-nitrophenol4-nHrophenoln-nltroeodlphenylamlnen-nrtroeo-dl-n-propytamlnepentaohloro phenolphenanthrenephenolpyrene1,2,4-trichlorobenzene2.4,5-trlohtero phenol2.4.8-triohtoro phenol_____

See Notee on Page 2

1594593LOH Revleion No.: 0 1of2 29-Oec-94

TABLE 2-1

AWED PAPER. INC7PORTAOE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE


MILL INVESTIGATIONSUSEPA CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM-TARGET COMPOUND LIST/TARGET ANALYTE LIST

^R&CdM'pbUN^W

Peeticldes/PCB Compoundsaldrinalpha- BHCArodor- 1016*Aroctor- 1221*Aroctor- 1232*Aroolor- 1242*Aroctor- 1248*Aroctor - 1254*Aroctor- 1260*

beta- BHCgam ma- BHC (Kndam)deHa-BHCalpha-chlordWMgamma-chlordan*4,4' -ODD4.4' -DDE4.4--DDTdieldrin

endosulfan 1endosuKan IIendosulfan sutfateendrinendrin aldehydeendrin ketoneheptachlorheptachlor epoxidemethoxychlortoxaphene

TARGETANALYtE :UST^:^& ' '-^:- '- : - , : '- i:^$t$l^%%&i^ <• -': U^ ^; i' < '•• •'' fv^B^ • -^M^lMSîim

M«tal«/Oth«r Compoundsaluminumantimonyarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumcalcium

L chromium

cobaltcoppercyanideironleadmagnesiummanganesemercury

nickelpotassiumseleniumsliversodiumthaliumvanadiumzinc

Notes:

TCL: USEPA, 1991 a.TAL USEPA, 1991b.•PCB were not included in the TCL/TAL analyses but were analyzed separately.

1594593LOH Revision No.: 0 2 of 2 29-Dec-94

TABLE 2-2


MILL INVESTIGATIONSSUMMARY OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESIDUALS/SOIL/SOLIDS SAMPLES


Georgia-Pacific MillGPC-1 0-1 Soil G52018 PCBGPD-1 NA Sediment Q62019 PCB+PCPP/PCPFGPP-1 NA Solids G62009 PCBGPL-1 0-0.5 Residuals G(i 004

0.5-1 SoilPCB MS/MSP

G52005 PCBGPL-2 0-0.5 Soil G52010 PCB

0.5-1.5 Residuals G52D11 PCB1.5-2.5 Soil PCB

GPL-3 0-0.5 Residuals PCB3.5-4.5 Residuals G62007 PCB4.5-5.0 Soil Q52008 PCB

GPL-4 0-0.5 Residuals GS2000 PCB0.5-1 Soil PCB

Duplicate (QS2001)Duplicate (G52003)

GPL-5 0-0.5 Soil PCB0.5-0.75 Soil/Residuals 062016 PCB0.75-2.0 Soil .G5SM7. PCB

Slmpson-Plalnwell MillSPC I 0-0.5 PCBSPC-2 NA Soil/Residuals 856026 PCBSPD-1 NA Sediment 866027 PCB + PCDD/PCDF MS/MSPSPI-1 3-3.5 Soil 866019 PCB MS/MSPSPL-1 0-0.5 Soil 866000

4-6 Residuals 8660016-8 Soil 866002

PCBPCBPCB

SPL-2 0-0.5 Soil PCB8-10 Residuals 886004 PCB10-12 son 886006 PCB

SPL-4 0-0.5 Soil 886010 PCB12-14 Residuals 866011 PCB16-18 Soil 886012 PCB

SPL-6 0-0.5 Soil 886013 PCB2-4 Soil 886014 PCB

SPL-11 0-0.5 Soil 856016 PCB10-10.5 Residuals 866016 PCB10.5-12 Soil 886017 PCB

SPL-13 0-0.5 Soil 886006 PCB0.5-1 Soil 886007 PCB14-16 Residuals 850 (016-18 Soil

PCBPCB MS/MSP

See Notes on Page 3

2494414LOE RmWon No.: 0 1of3 29-060-94

TABLE 2-2


MILL INVESTIGATIONSSUMMARY OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESIDUALS/SOIL/SOUDS SAMPLES


p||||||;||;|||

Slmpson-Plainwell Mill - Warehouse Construction Site SamplingSPG-1SPG-2SPG-3SPW-1

SPW-2

SPW-3

SPW-4

SPW-5

SPW-6

SPW-7

SPW-8SPW-9SPW-10SPW-1 1SPW-1 2SPW-1 3SPW-USPW-1 5SPW-1 6SPW-1 7SPW-1 8SPW-1 9SPW-21SWL-1SWL-2SWL-3

0.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.52.0-2.54.5-5.00.0-0.52.0-2.54.5-5.00.0-0.52.0-2.54.0-4.50.0-0.52.0-2.54.0-4.50.0-0.52.0-2.54.0-4.50.0-0.5

2.0-2.54.0-4.50.0-0.52.0-2.54.0-4.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.50.0-0.5

NA*NA*NA*

(composite)

SoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

SoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoli

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

Immunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCB

PCBPCBPCBPCBPCBPCB

Immunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCB/PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCBImmunoassay PCB

Duplicate (SPW-D1)MS/MSD

Duplicate taken

•

Split sample submitted tor PCBanalysis

Duplicate taken

See Notes on Page 3

2484414LOE RevUlon No.: 0 2of3 29-D«c-94

TABLE 2-2


MILL INVESTIGATIONSSUMMARY OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION RESIDUALS/SOIL/SOLIDS SAMPLES


Be

Former King MillKMD-1 NA Sediment FS0017 PCB+PCDD/PCDF MS/MSP and Duplicate (FS0018FKMS-1 NA Soil F60015 PCB Duplicate (F50016)KM-2 0-0.5 Soil FS0006 PCB

3.5-4 Soil F50007 PCBKM-4 0-0.5 Residuals F50000 PCB Duplicate (F50001)

1.5-2 Soil F50002 PCBKM-7 0-0.5 .Soil F50003 PCB

6-6.5 Residuals FS0004 PCB MS/MSP7-7.5 Soil FS0005 PCB

Former Monarch MillMM-1 10-12 Residuals PCB MS/MSP and Duplicate (M58002)MM-2 11.5-13.5 Soil M88000 PCB

Kino Street Storm SewerKino StreKSHB-1 0-0.5

0.5 - 1.5 Soil/ResidualsziaoooZ18001

PCBPCB

KSHB-2 0-0.5 Soil Z18002 PCB1.0-2.0 Soil/Residuals Z18003 PCB

KSHB-3 0-0.5 Soil Z18004 PCB0.5- 1.5 Soil/Residuals Z18006 PCB

Duplicate (Z18005)

KSHB-4 0-0.5 Soil 218014 PCB1.5-^5 Soil Z18018 PCB

KSHB-5 0-0.5 Soil Z18011 PCB1.5 - 2.5 Soil Z16012 PCB+TCL/TAL Duplicate (Z18013). MS/MSP

KSHB-6 0-0.5 Soil Z18008 PCB MS/MSP1.5-2.5 Soil/Residuals Z18010 PCB

KSHB-7 0-0.5 Soil Z18007 PCB0.5-1.0 Soil jiagoe. PCB

Notes:1 The depth Is referenced to ground surface.2 MS/MSD and duplicate were for PCDD/PCDF analysis only.NA - Not applicable because taken as a grab sample.* - from stock-piled soil.

2494414UOE RavWon No.: 0 3 0*3 29-DM-94

TABLE 2-3

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

MILL INVESTIGATIONSSAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP SUMMARY


i;:!;l!:l: |iiili|lli!llili;SiiiBliJSi G'i uiplM

38218

3822244622

llllaiitiiiillliilil;Z 18000Z18001Z 18002Z 18003Z 18004Z 18006Z 18007Z 18008Z 18009Z18010Z18011Z18014Z18015Z18012S56000S56001S56002S56003S56004S56005S56006S56007S56008S56009S56010S5601 1856012856013856014S56015

S|f;!:;|sil|:ii|ill|?IPliiSillilllsiiiiii

llli liwiiillillllSoil

Soil/ResidualsSoil

Soil/ResidualsSoil

Soil/ResidualsSoilSoilSoil

Soil/ResidualsSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

ResidualsSoilSoil

ResidualsSoilSoilSoil

ResidualsSoilSoil

ResidualsSoilSoilSoilSoil

KSHB-1KSHB-1KSHB-2KSHB-2KSHB-3KSHB-3KSHB-7KSHB-7KSHB-6KSHB-6KSHB-5KSHB-4KSHB-4KSHB-5SPL-1SPL-1SPL-1SPL-2SPL-2SPL-2SPL-1 3SPL-1 3SPL-1 3SPL-1 3SPL-4SPL-4SPL-4SPL-6SPL-6SPL-11

i;: lli f •; :; :!#!• :; iN & P ?• AH aiysis :; ?;; I ::: : '•-. . :jj i; ":; ; 'i :i •: :; '&

fi<MmXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

iiifciip

X

; &Mui

X

PCDD/i^p' Fjt •^•btijsitCiaiBP

Z18005

Z18013

;;Ms?Msb

X

X

X

2394667LOT Revision No.: 0 1of3 29-Dec-94

TABLE 2-3




44622(Cont'd.)

44707

44741

44742

:8lil?l:li;i;liiil;|sSi;;|:;:;i;:;;ipi;lp;;sp;f

IlllliiilllllS56025S56026S56027S56016S56017S56019F50000F50002F50003F50004F50005F50006F50007F50015F50017G52000G52002G52004G52005G52006G52007G52008G520090520 10G52011G52012G52015G52016G52017G52018G52019

I Mi HI 11 111lliiiiiliiiiSoil

Soil/ResidualsSedimentResiduals

SoilSoil

ResidualsSoilSoil

ResidualsSoilSoilSoilSoil

SedimentResiduals

SoilResiduals

SoilResidualsResiduals

SoilSolidsSoil

ResidualsSoilSoil

Soil/ResidualsSoilSoil

Sediment

SPC-1SPC-2SPD-1SPL-11SPL-11SPI-1KM -4KM -4KM -7KM -7KM -7KM -2KM -2KM8-1KMD-1GPL-4GPL-4GPL-1GPL-1GPL-3GPL-3GPL-3GPP-1GPL-2GPL-2GPL-2GPL-5QPL-5QPL-5GPC-1QPD-1

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

L XXXXXXXXX

illllpf!;sssiilGLtBsss 1111111'%%moimI:ip|lDillillipjei li

F50001

F50016

G52001G52003

tM$/M$D;l;

X

X

X


TABLE 2-3

ALLIED PAPER, INC7PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE



c cl46093 M58000

M58001Soil MM-2

Residuals MM- M58002TLI28196 S56027 Sediment SPD-TLI 28239 F50017

G52019Sediment KMD-Sediment GPD-

F50018

A4I1 230082 SPW-1ASPW-1BSPW-1CSPW-2ASPW-2BSPW-2C

Soil SPW-Soil SPW-Soil SPW-Soil SPW-2Soil SPW-2Soil SPW-2

SPW-D1

A4J299031 SPW-6A Soil SPW-6


TABLE 3-1


MILL INVESTIGATIONSGEORGIA-PACIFIC MILL

SUMMARY OF BORING/CORE FIELD DATA


ilillilllllliiiiblfriii/Coirilii iiiiiiliiiiiSeJIiilii

lllpffiiillflllmi®ii®®i$$!im:; >: 'W-£'£&$&^££&:&'-:-:':''':' T«*"Pffl: 'ffHy fr flF-"' '''-'

lilltlll? :: ; J :! I beicriptibfj of Residuals1 ••• 1-'* : • -• • • : '; I i ': ••

1 :- : :' :. ' - . . • ' ' . '''- ' ~~- ' • ' -' - '

thickness ofResiduals* (ft)

Former LagoonsGPL-1GPL-2

GPL-2B4

GPL-3GPL-4GPL-54

GPL-6GPL-74'5

06/09/9406/09/9406/09/9406/09/9406/09/9406/09/9406/09/9406/09/94

1.03.01.05.01,02.03.02.0

0.0 - 0.30.5 - 1.5

--0.0 - 4.50.0 - 0.50.5 - 0.8

--0.5- 1.0

Grey clay/little paper fibersGrey clay and fine sand/little paper fibersNo residualsGrey paper fibers and clayGrey clay/some paper fibersDark grey clay/paper fibersNo residualsGrey clay/paper fibers

0.31.00

4.50.50.30

0.5

Notes:'Descriptions provided only for Intervals within which residuals were encountered.2 The depth Is referenced to ground surface.3 The thickness of residuals within the borings/cores.4 Sample collected for visual description only.5 Sample Is a core.

1294667LOT Revision No.: 0 1oM 29-Deo-94

TABLE 3-2


MILL INVESTIGATIONSSIMPSON PLAINWELL MILL

SUMMARY OF BORING FIELD DATA


llili:||!f;§:i;!i|i::;1:

illlblillillfllBiilli

mmmximmmSSti^KiifilMiliffill

issfleslduas's;;:!Deoth JnterviP;:: i:;:lli lliiil

llllliilltil :&::: ;' :: • :. :: : ' :; :; ':' ; :' ik ; - .: ? - - :-. ••••. : :: : ' • : ' . - '• ''"'• ^ : '•.':•"' • ' : • ' : : '; ? •: :; '. . : : : ; • I :' '(^ i- '. .<& '"• •• • Description :Of .Residuals^ :- ; i ; :• •-•:: 1 :•:; ;. t;i :; ;/; .;,-•:* i !-;: !••:•; -:; ii?:

Thickness ofResiduals3 (ft)

Former LagoonsSPL-1SPL-2SPL-34

SPL-4SPL-54

SPL-74

SPL-84

SPL-9A4

SPL-9B4

SPL-104

SPL-1 1SPL-124

SPL-1 3

06/02/9406/03/9406/08/9406/07/9406/06/9406/02/9406/03/9406/03/9406/03/94

06/06/94

06/08/9406/06/9406/07/94

18.014.016.018.010.020.012.06.07.515.0

12.014.018.0

1.5-6.05.5 - 11.06.0 - 12.011.8- 13.5

7.5-7.67.5 - 18.05.5- 11.50.2 - 2.02.0 - 5.50.0 - 0.53.0 - 4.0

10.0 - 10.2--

14.0 - 16.0

Grey clay/white clay/grey paper fibersLight to dark grey clay/white clay/light grey paper fibersBlack silt/black- grey coal ash/grey clay and paper fibersGrey silt/some clay and paper fibersGrey clay and paper fibersLight grey to black clay/white grading to grey clay/ paper fibersGrey clay/paper fibersDark brown fine to medium sand/some silt/trace paper fibersBrown/grey clay/paper fibersBrown/grey silt and fine to medium sand, trace paper fibersBrown silt/some fine to medium sand/trace paper fibersGrey clay/paper fibersNo residualsBrown/grey fine sand and grey paper fibers

4.55.56.01.70.110.56.01.83.50.51.00.20

2.0

Aeration BasinSPL-6 06/08/94 6.0 -- No residuals 0

Notes:'Descriptions provided only for Intervals within which residuals were encountered.2 The depth Is referenced to ground surface.3 The thickness of residuals within the borings.4 Sample collected for visual description only.

1094667 LOT Revision No.: 0 1 of 1 29-Dec-94

TABLE 3-3

ALUED PAPER, INC7PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

MILL INVESTIGATIONSFORMER KING MILL



lllflllfllf ;:;;:;::;

: :•:;>: :X:>::'::::::: :|: >: '';. ;i >;;:| x v :•; •:• xjxj

tlli$rfai$l*

3tl!i!!t;l!!li!II

|i|;;i|£ja1e:;1||ili»ffliniiP«

Illllllilllll

IllipiiiSpil

IlllliiillOepih Iriieivirxlllliifilll

•••|§|l|l|||||llN::|: ;;.;; •: ; -P; :;.p: j i;| ;;i|.j !; • ;; :; •: i: .:.:.:; : :; : • : .; ; < •• ; ; ; :' : - > : : :; !: ;;-; .;; ;•••:;•;: ; •? \^, ;: •:!:: 1 jlith^ •iilllllPlllieioriiiiii P silitiais ; ;: :; ; i-K i 'iv?;:; ii iN.-: :! - i ; '•• '• \ -A f

Thickness of; fteSlduals? (ft)

Former LagoonsKM-34

KM-4KM-54

KM-64

KM-7KM-84

06/10/9406/10/9406/13/9406/13/9406/10/9406/13/94

3.02.014.010.57.512.0

0.0 - 0.30.0 - 0.50.5 - 3.00.0 - 9.51.5-6.50.0 - 9.5

Greyflne sand and silt/trace paper fibersGrey silt/little fine sand/trace paper fibersBrown/black slag/some silt/concrete/grey paper fibersGrey clay/little paper fibersDark grey paper fibers/some clayLight brown clay/some paper fibers/dark grey paper fibers

0.30.52.59.55.09.5

Former ClarlfiersKM-13

KM -206/14/9406/14/94

2.54.0

----

No residualsNo residuals

00

Notes:Descriptions provided only for Intervals within which residuals were encountered.1 The depth Is referenced to ground surface.3 The thickness of residuals within the borings.4 Sample collected for visual description only.


TABLE 3-4


MILL INVESTIGATIONSFORMER MONARCH MILL



llPlSiifapil:Wimmimii:Jls*IIi>ilieilllll

::>:::::::;:: :::::.:: y-: ,|:::::::::::'::::::::::::y::-:::::;:::::::: ::'mm^tommmm^^§!lMii <ili i S i|M;;;;fflH^S

Former RacewayMM-1MM-2

08/17/9408/17/94

14.015.5

11.0- 11.5 Dark brown plant fibers mixed with grey paper fibersNo residuals

.:::"::' . :i:: ;>Y : • : ' > ' • - • : ;- •-''.:-'-•'"• .-•'.'•:.

;;: Thickness ofj Residuals* (ft)

0.50

Notes:Descriptions provided only for Intervals within which residuals were encountered.2 The depth Is referenced to ground surface.3 The thickness of residuals within the borings.

1394667LOT Revision No.: 0 1 of 1 29-Dec-94

TABLE 3-5

See Notes on Page 2


MILL INVESTIGATIONSKING STREET STORM SEWER

SUMMARY OF CORE FIELD DATA


•mm&otemm.:KSHB-1

KSHB-2

KSHB-3

KSHB-4

KSHB-5

KSHB-6

KSHB-7

KSHB-82

mmii&mim;:;;;:;S;:!:: iie"claisslt

7/27/93

7/27/93

7/27/93

7/27/93

7/27/93

7/27/93

7/27/93

7/26/93

lii|||||§lili|;'mmmffltmmm

1.5

2

1.5

0.6

0

2.5

1.0

1.5

illllRlBplBliiPIsiiilii iiiiiM^^^^^Smm

0-0.50.5- 1.50-0.51 -2

0-0.50.5 - 1.50-0.51.5-2.50-0.51.5-2.50-0.51.5-2.50-0.50.5- 10-0.50.5- 11 -1.51.5-22-2.52.5-3

•:-:•••:•:•••; :• • ••• •• • • • •. ;-•• -•• •• •• •• •- • - • - • . - •- .•-•- .•-•• . ' . . - . • - - ... . • • . -. .- - • . . • . • • . • - . . • • . • • . • - . • • . , • . • - . . - ; . .;.;- ;. • .;.-.- -. •--•. •;••;•••: • . : . ;• . • . • . • . • . • • : • : • . • : • : • : • : • : • • - : - • . • : - . • . : • : • : • : • • : • . • : • • : : • • : • . • : - - - : - - • - • : • : • • . • . • - . - : ; . • • : - . • . . : : : • - . . - - . . • • . . • • . : • : • - : . - : - ; • - . - . - . : - . - . . • . • . : - - . : • : • - , - •:•••: :•:•: :•:•:•:•: :• -; :•:•: ••: : :-. :• •: :-:•: ;• •: :• -: :• •: •• •:- ' • : : - . - : : • • . • . • : • ; • . . - : - • • : ! • - : • • • • : • - . . . .-; .-: .- -.- • -. • : .-. : .• •. :• •: •- -: -. . . - - : : . :-' : :-.-: :- •: • - . • : ' - ' • : - • . ' • : • : '

Mm mm m I m z * • ? ,-: ; i : SarriDie \ Desert Dtion i :! :; ; !;. a ;; m \ m i m ;; i:; ;; :..:; ; ;; ;: ;Brown to dark brown fine sand, trace silt, organic matterBrown to dark brown fine sand, trace silt, grey clay/residualsBrown to dar brown clay, trace fine sand, organic matterBrown to grey clay/residuals, trace fine sandBrown to dark brown fine sand with a trace of siltDark brown fine sand, trace silt, grey clayDark brown fine sand and silt with organic matterGrey to brown slit and fine sand with organic matterDark brown to black fine sand and silt, organic matter and odorBlack silt and fine sand, organic odorDark brown fine sand and silt, organic matterGrey to dark grey clay/residualsDark brown fine sand, some grey clay/paper residualBrown to grey clay/residualsDark brown to black fine sand, organic matterDark brown fine sand, some grey clay and some residualsDark grey residualsDark grey residuals, trace fine sandLight grey residuals and fine sandLight grey fine sand, some residuals


TABLE 3-5



SUMMARY OF CORE FIELD DATA


Illlllllilliliic'b'riitiiKSHB-92

KSHB-102

KSHB-112

Illllllilliliiiiioiiliiiil

7/26/93

7/26/93

7/26/93

mi^p^Mmm;li|i|||l|i!|

--

1.5

3

0-0.50.5- 11 -1.51.5-22-2.52.5-30-0.50.5- 11 - 1.51.5-20-0.50.5 - 11 - 1.51.5-22-2.52.5-3

!l$!lllf:ifiiiO&Dark brown fine sand, some siltDark brown fine sand on top of brown to residualsLight grey to grey residualsWet grey clay/residualsGrey clay/residualsBlack fine sand and silt, organic odorDark brown fine sand, trace silt, organic matterGrey to brown clay/residuals, trace fine sandGrey clay/residualsDark grey fine sand, trace coarse sand and some residualsDark brown clay, trace fine sand, organic matterDark brown clay, trace fine sand on top grey clay/residualsGrey clay/residualsGrey to tan clay/residualsDark brown to tan clay with some residualsGrey to brown clay/residuals

Notes;1 The depth Is referenced to ground surface.2 Sample collected for visual description only.

0994667LOT Revision No.: 0 2crf2 29-Dec-94

TABLE 3-6

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREE^KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED PCB RESULTS FOR RESIDUALS/SOIL SAMPLES1 (mg/kg)


i:;:;Lc>(5aii6rt:l ;)i;;|;:i:.:;:;'::n^GapfoMmmmmis$rri£)e':iD:: :: y:; ;:i

Aroclor 1016Aroclor 1242Aroclor 1248Aroclor 1254Aroclor 1260

m^Gpmmmmm^MtmmmmimM^^mmm

ND (8.7 U)110

ND (8.7 U)ND (8.7 U)ND (8.7 U)

llIliSPL&lliill

>mi:mmmmm0.27 J

ND (0.30 U)2.6

ND (0.30 U)ND (0.30 U)

WiiimmQm^K:

1.8ND (0.34 U)

3.80.640.35

•::,-:y:.GPL-2 '<•*• :0,5-1.5 .

:ji;siôsaoil'.::.;-;-:-i;

ND (0.36 U)4.6

0.73ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)

GPL-21.5-2,5G52013

0.47ND (0.063 U)ND (0.063 U)ND (0.063 U)ND10.063U)

GPL-30.0 -0,5G52006

ND (0.084 U)ND (0.084 U)ND (0.084 U)

0.15 j0.046 J

fL;6;ciil6rPvi y : :IS ;:-sSDepthi(ft) : : : ^ ::;:::iv: •• • 'l:iM^Ri0:iibiiPilll:Kili


:: :;;.:;.;;:; ;'3 ,5! ;ii:4;5 !;•;;;•:; ?;;;;:!.

ND (12 U)70

ND(12U)ND (12 U)ND(12U)

":. :: :;-::.:'-:: :: :' /2OI : •' ': :''J5t ': :;':::l:^v::lvft-. : • : • : :•'•_'. : •: :• . IJJT l . ^w ''-:: :;::::::;::'-:;:;x:

';::;;:?;::>:415: :;5.05;™iP^:

ND (0.060 U)ND (0.060 U)

0.78ND (0.060 U)ND (0.060 U)

|||||lill4ll:S:;x:-:

sss;s?j:i()iOia.::'0*5:::':-::: ;

ND (0.073 U)ND (0.073 U)ND (0.073 U)ND (0.073 U)ND (0.073 U)

iGPL-4(Dup)0.0 - 0.5

^^GSaOQSi::^:;:


:; :GPL-4 \ .0.5-1.0G52002 :

ND (0.063 U)ND (0.063 U)

0.840.230.14

GPL-4(Dup)0,5 - 1.0G52003

ND (0.064 U)ND (0.064 U)

0.610.21 |0.12 j

lIBMWiill liS Djjptfi {ft) i : J? :: ;•? ': :: -

ii8£iiS)eift>&iili;ji


;ki!HS6$lii!i: I;.;;:; |: :| iijjjjj iii OiS: i¥: ••< :: * £

Illlol SiSililil

ND (0.55 U)5.0

ND (0.55 U)0.56

0.30 J

: :;:vi: K;: OiS? i(J^755si:S«:S

ND (0.40 U)2.90.47

ND (0.40 U)ND (0.40 U)

llllpplii!i;!s:ym||il|iS520l7llf!S:S:;

ND(0.11 U)ND(0.11 U)ND(0.11 U)ND(0.11 U)

0.043 J

y^-:GPC-^r; . : •

:: ::iSG520 18' :>;,::.:.•:

ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)

0.15J

; GPD-1

G52019

ND (0.064 U)0.310.31

ND (0.064 U)0.033 J

GPP-1

G52009

ND (0.063 U)ND (0.063 U)

0.15 |ND (0.063 U) jND (0.063 U)

See Notes on Page 2

2694667LOP Revision No.: 0 1 of 2 28-Dec-94

TABLE 3-6 DRAFT FORSTATE AND

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER FEDERALSUPERFUND SITE REVIEW



Notes:1 Showing only the results for compounds detected above quantltation limits.2 MS/MSD of this sample was analyzed.ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively Identified. However, the associated numerical value is an estimated concentration only.U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value Is the compound quantltation limit.


TABLE 3-7



SUMMARY OF DETECTED PCDD/PCDF RESULTS FORSTORMWATER-RELATED SAMPLE1 (mg/kg)


Location; ; . • • 2 • '. ,:^/ v-:,..: ...;::.;:.: :,v:-;:Sample ID

1, 2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDDOCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF

• • • • • GPD-1G52019

1.4E-63.8 E-69.7 E-56.0 E-4

2.9 E-61,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2.0 E-61, 2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF ; 1.1 E-61, 2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDFOCDF

1.1 E-58.8 E -73.5 E-5

Note:1 Showing only the results for congeners detected above quantitation limits.


TABLE 3-8

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAQE CREErVKALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUNDSITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED PCB RESULTS FOR RESIDUALS/SOIL SAMPLES' (mg/kg)


i Location : : • '."••'•i^-•:;:,;peptti-: (ft) :::;:::.;;:- ;.;:.;.:;::i:;SarnF>telDSi:;J;:;H:::'-'::;

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1260

^^piiOTiii'mwDro.stmm-

h:ft:':;:::;:;;e8eOOO;;S;l';l ;;:;;:;;

ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 LO

t;;i;:£RM;:ifim^4.6^6^:mmmifM^mm

0.080 JND (0.094 U)ND(0.094U)

0.19ND(0.094U)

iiiiiissiiioiifsmmsmmmm

0.029 JND (0.062 U)

0.036 J0.050 J

ND (0.062 U)

IP :spL-2:;.:::;.•m o.o -o.sovK^Sseooa:: . • . ; •

ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)

0.040 J

SPL-28.0-10S56004

ND (0.080 U)ND (0.080 U)

0.0820.12

ND (0.080 U)

SPL-210-12S56005

ND (0.056 U)ND (0.056 U)

0.025 JND (0.056 U)ND (0.056 U)

SPL-40.0-0.50S56010

ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)ND {0.051 U)

SPL-412-14S5601 1

ND (0.11 U)0.680.130.60

0.070 J

::'::Locatlori:.<i.::i;:i:;:::::i:::-::

:^.b'eplh'(ft^JBB'::^::y:if^3ti/in&i>'\6i:^Wf^--K


•;:;:'.;:i;:ifiSJPLii4i?iilllli:-i::::!-; :;::;ie' jSliiiI;;:S ::'i:£&6&2*;i3i3!J

ND (0.058 U)0.048 J

ND (0.058 U)ND(0.058U)N 0(0.058 LI)

;I& $&%&:!!W^^WMimm^ms<mmm.

ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)

0.190.079

t3$8ii?M%lW%%8%i38:'

mtmmmm:;S8!8:iSiii«s;5


li::SPi.:~i.i::;:-:::;:::i;::6.d-0.56v::::.1S-;:::S56015::.:;;:'',:

ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)ND (0.050 U)

0.038 JND (0.050 U)

H SPL-1110-10.5S56016

ND(0.16UJ)0.81 J0.24 J0.51 J

0.071 J

SPL-1110.5-12S56017

ND (0.057 U)0.051 J

ND (0.057 U)ND (0.057 U)ND (0.057 U)

SPL-130,0-0.50S56006


4 SPL-13: 0,50-1.0

S56007


See Notes on Page 2

1394667LOS Revision No.: 0 1of2 29-Dec-94

TABLE 3-8

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAQE CREE^KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUNDSITE




:::Locatlon:-ffi.:i:;;;:.. • : - ; ; ; ::;:: Depth (ft) : - : . ;:•?:.?:::;:. ::H:?.:

SJ3 ample ID^M i5


mmmmm^¥-HSB6^6Wî

ND (0.055 U)ND (0.055 U)

0.11ND (0.055 U)ND (0.055 U)

(IffilRll;.i;;:i:-i1'8/ 18;;:i;5;S:i;:::::::i;:S5600a?;SffiH

ND (0.056 U)0.091

ND (0.056 U)ND (0.056 U)ND (0.056 U)

IllllllllllSSisiOiOsltSiS.;:?::*;:y::;;i:lli(ii$:i?:iii;i::

ND (0.051 LI)ND (0.051 U)ND (0.051 U)

0.510.23

| | gpb^2 : ' ; . : :

::i; :SS6026 :-.:::

ND(32U)ND (32 U)

240ND (32 U)ND (32 U)

SPD-1

S56027

ND (0.40 U)ND(0.40U)ND (0.40U)

2.90.99

SPI-13.0-3.5S56019

ND(0.12U)ND(0.12U)ND (0.12 U)

0.820.61

SPW-13

0.0-0.5SPW-1A

ND (0.096U)ND (0.096 U)ND (0.096U)

0.037 JND (0.1 9 U)

SPW-1s(dup)0.0-0.5 ISPW-D1 |

ND (0.093U)ND (0.093 U)ND (0.093U)

0.024 J jND (0.1 9 U)

Location ':;.i;:;:;.:;;:.-. : - ; • : ; •;; I \ Dep«itft):u;;:;: \ M ::;;•;;£iSa'riBt*:IQllll;:i;i-i:


mtf^+Wim*tm:s&3&mz.;:;;: :;:;8'f*irirr :ii;ii5*:J:

ND (0.090 U)ND (0.090 U)

0.061 J0.20

ND(0.18U)

iifpiSpirV -lisNl:;iiiiM^^btllJiitisliiiM I&iii;

ND (0.096 U)ND (0.096 U)

0.023 J0.18J

ND(0.19U)

m mm®mmmmiiiMilmm

ND (0.081 U)ND (0.081 U)ND (0.081 U)ND(0.16U)ND(0.16U)

•;:*1:.8PW 2*;:;. ::•;•;!»i:2kl 2.^:'::i:.:.:iJH;SPW^2B::::;ii

ND (0.095 U)ND (0.095 U)ND (0.095 U)ND(0.19U)ND(0.19U)

: SPW-2V: 4.5-5.0SPW-20 .

ND (0.085 U)ND(0.085U)ND (0.085 U)ND(0.17U)ND(0.17U)

SPW-63

0.0-0.5SPW-6A

ND (0.21 U)ND (0.21 U)ND (0.21 U)

1.8ND(0.42U)

Notes:'Showing only the results for compounds detected above quantltatlon Hmits.2MS/MSD of this sample was analyzed.'Samples from the warehouse construction site, which are not included as part of the Rl work scope as presented in the Work Plan.ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively Identified. However, the associated numerical value Is an estimated concentration only.U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is the compound quantitation limit.UJ - The compound was not detected above the reported sample quantltatlon limit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may not represent

the actual limit of quantitation.

1394667LOS Revision No.: 0 2of2 29-Dec-94

TABLE 3-9

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUNDSITE



DRAFT FORSTATE ANDf E D f c R A LREVIEW

LocationSample ID

2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD

: 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD: 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDDOCDD

SPD-1S56027

5.1E-52.9E-44.5E-4

1.4E-4 JPR1.4E-21.9E-1

2,3,7, 8-TCDF 6.5E-41,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 4.7E-52,3,4,7, 8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3, 6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDFOCDF

5.0E-51.7E-43.8E-5

6.0E-5 JPR9.4E-48.6E-52.5E-3

Notes:1 Showing only the results for congeners detected above quantitation limits.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively identified. However, the associated numerical value Is an estimated

concentration only.PR - The reported concentration may be underestimated due to a poorly resolved gas chromatographic

peak.


TABLE 3-10

ALLIED PAPER INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

MILL INVESTIGATIONSSIMPSON PLAINWELL MILL WAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION SITE SAMPLING

SUMMARY OF PCB RISc™ IMMUNOASSAY SOIL TESTS

[ W A T T ( O KSTATE AMDr t D L R A L

Sample IDDepth

(ft)Change from

OD StandardsOD Sample

1 ppm1 ppm

InterpretationOD Sample

25 ppm25 ppm

Interpretation

October 6, 1994SPG-1

I SPG-2SPG-3SPW-3

SPW-4

SPW-5

SPW-6

I SPW-7

SPW-8SPW-9SPW-10SPW-11SPW-12

; SPW-13

0.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.5

0.0 - 0.5 (dup)2.0 - 2.54.0 - 4.50.0 - 0.52.0 - 2.54.0 - 4.50.0 - 0.52.0 - 2.54.0 - 4.50.0 - 0.52.0 - 2.54.0 - 4.50.0 - 0.52.0 - 2.54.0 - 4.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.5

-0.08-0.08-0.08-0.09-0.04-0.09-0.09-0.04-0.04-0.04-0.14-0.14-0.14-0,14-0.22-0.22-0.22-0.22-0.22-0.22-0.22-0.22-0.00-0.00-0.00

+0.12+ 0.19+ 0.49-0.72-0.95+ 0.32+ 0.40+ 0.53+ 0.56+ 0.76-0.86+ 0.26+ 0.16-0.61+ 0.65+0.07-0.98+0.56+0.47-1.29-0.91+ 0.08+ 0.15+ 0.16+ 0.43

NDNDND>1>1NDNDNDNDND>1NDND>1NDND>1NDND>1>1NDNDNDND

+ 0.73+ 0.59+ 0.48+ 0.35

+ 0.66+ 0.49+ 0.73+ 0.74+ 0.69

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

NDNDNDND

NDNDNDNDNDNANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

October 12, 1994SPW-14SPW-15SPW-16SPW-17

SPW-18SPW-19SPW-21SWL-1SWL-2SWL-3

0.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.5

0.0 - 0.5 (dup)0.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.50.0 - 0.5

Grab Sample*Grab Sample*

Composite Sample*

-0.16-0.16-0.16-0.02-0.16-0.02-0.02-0.16-0.20-0.20-0.20

+ 0.07+ 0.32+ 0.56+ 0.35+ 0.21+ 0.36+ 0.54+ 0.44+ 0.33+ 0.16+ 0.40

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

L ND

+ 0.57+ 0.65+ 0.67+ 0.52+ 0.65+ 0.71+ 0.68+ 0.50+ 0.82+ 0.47+ 0.51

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

Notes:OD - Optical DensityND - Not detectedNA - Not analyzed* - from stock-piled soil

0194667LOU Revision No.: 0 1 of 1 29-Dec-94

TABLE 3-11




DRAFT FORSTATE ANDFEDERALR E V I E W

;::t,dC:atlon1;::;::::s;;;::::!;:yj;;:!;;.:;!;;tbep (ft}:!:tl|!||;|â'rhpl ;-ioV:: .;';:y4|||liAroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1260

^mm^m^mmmiM:Qti±o'>$tifii&;il;;y;i.ii; 66o<s;;iiiiiiiii.

ND (0.061 U)ND (0.061 U)

0.340.092

'AKS.^\ft^^Vf^K!fif tit::•;:::; ::::::.;:5tVM -:«J:5Sa 3£:

mmmmm mND (0.058 U)ND (0.058 U)ND (0.058 U)ND (0.058 U)

lili:KM-4- .: , :li|6lb<rti,50 .U^:'lltlsb'boo; ::•:": :::.:;

ND (0.059 U)ND (0.059 U)ND (0.059 U)ND (0.059 U)

:KM-4(dup)0.0-0.50

: F50001

ND (0.059 U)ND (0.059 U)ND (0.059 U)ND (0.059 U)

KM-4 . :1.5-2.0F50002

ND (0.069 U)ND (0.069 U)ND (0.069 U)ND (0.069 U)

KM-70.0-0.50F50003

6019

ND(3.9U)ND(3.9U]

îj06^0f\^^M^

:^be:pfh;îliHJ^^-:sSWp:le"}Dl l;N; §;::Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1260

mm^m^mwmmm^stitiriwmmm

34ND (3.0 U)ND (3.0 U)ND (3.0 U)

•;i££kKi(I$iIil

mmmmmî1.2

ND(0.11 U)ND(0.11 U)ND(0.11 U)

llI'Mb t1 : ; : • : : , :iiib-.P6>oi.;:;:::::-llilFSOOir-:-::-

ND (0.056 U)0.0700.063

0.041 J

KMS-10,0-0,0F50015

ND (0.38 U)ND (0.38 U)

4.71.1

KMS-1 (dup)0.0-0.0F50016

ND (0.49 U)ND (0.49 U)

7.61.6

Notes:1 Showing only the results for compounds detected above quantltatlon limits.1 MS/MSD of this sample was analyzed.ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively identified. However, the assolcated numerical value Is an estimated concentration only.U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value Is the compound quantltation limit.

1694667LOS Revision No.: 0 1 of 1 28-Dec-94

TABLE 3-12




D R A F T FURS T A T E ANDFEDERALREVIEW

LocationSample ID

2,3,7,8-TCDD1, 2,3,7, 8-PeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDDOCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1, 2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4.7,8,9-HpCDFOCDF

KMD-1F50017

9.8E-61.6E-62.5E-66.5E-6

4.6E-6JPR2.0E-42.2E-3

2.1E-52.4E-6J3.9E-6J

8.4E-6JPR3.7E-6

3.9E-6B3.4E-52.9E-61.1E-4

KMD-1 (dup)F50018

9.6E-6ND(1.1E-6UJ)

2.1E-67.1E-6

4.6E-6JPR2.1E-42.4E-3

2.1E-5ND(8.8E-7UJ)

1.8E-6J4.2E-6

1.9E-6JPRND(2.0E-6UJB)ND(3.5E-5UJ)

2.8E-61.1E-4

Notes:1 Showing only the results for congeners detected above quantitation limits.NO - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:B - The reported value was obtained from a reading less than the contract required detection limit

(CRDL) but greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit (IDL).J - The compound was positively Identified. However, the associated numerical value Is an estimated

concentration only.PR - The reported concentration may be underestimated due to a poorly resolved gas chromatographic

peak.UJ - The compound was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit. However, the reported

limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation.


TABLE 3-13



SUMMARY OF PCB RESULTS FOR RESIDUALS/SOIL SAMPLES (mg/kg)

LocationDepth (tt)Sample ID

Aroclor-1016

MM-11

10-12M58001

ND (0.069 U)

MM-1 (dup)10-12M58002

ND (0.066 U)Aroclor-1221 j ND (0.069 U) ND (0.066 U)Aroclor-1232 ND (0.069 U) ND (0.066 U)

j Aroclor-1242 ND (0.069 U) j ND (0.066 U)Aroclor-1248 ND (0.069 U) i ND (0.066 U)Aroclor-1254 ND (0.069 U) ; ND (0.066 U)

MM-211.5-13.5M58000

ND (0.067 U)ND (0.067 U)ND (0.067 U)ND (0.067 U)ND (0.067 U)ND (0.067 U)

Aroclor-1260 , ND (0.069 U) ND (0.066 U) _j ND (0.067 U)

Notes:1 MS/MSD of this sample was analyzed.

ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifier:U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value Is

the compound quantitation limit.

1494667LOS Revision No.: 0 1 of 1 28-Dec-94

TABLE 3-14



SUMMARY OF DETECTED PCB RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES1 (mg/kg)


; location wm± .6e;pii ;i::ll-iSampJ^D ;pAroclor-1016Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1260

.it;;; KSHB-I^^ ;^:tlt;b'.u~;6.50i::;':l:;]^^m^-ziBOQ^mu

0.055 JND (0.063 U)ND (0.063 U)

0.290.027 J

:;;p!.ks'i-i|si! ;:;;;;*:?f!fI$MM!lilWllzi&QQW^m

ND(0.16U)ND(0.16U)

0.431.2

0.20

BmzwoimmND (0.75 U)ND (0.75 U)

4.80.48 J0.51J

illKSHB-a;:'-:Ill;tto:-.:;:.

ilili 8(303 :;::::

ND (0.84 U)ND (0.84 U)

2.81.2

0.52 J

KSHB-36.0-0.50218004

ND (0.1 4 U)ND (0.14 U)

0.730.77

ND10.25 U)

KSHB-S(dup)0,0-0.50Z18005

ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)

1.8NDJ0.36 U)

KSHB-3 :0.50-1.5Z18006

ND (4.5 U)ND (4.5 U)

32ND (4.5 U)ND (4.5 U)

. . iKSHB-40.0-0.50

: Z18014ND (1.1 U)ND (1.1 U)ND (1.1 U)

6.4ND (11 U) _j

;:t|iiftjjOrnif;-;:;:::;(De;:(3tr\{fi)::::iiii:i;!!;:i:riSafiiE>ie::::|b::ffif;::;:Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254Aroclor- 1 260

:iWi WPil!l^^^Qoi5)?mm

NC (0.54 U)5.4

NC (0.54 U)0.83

NCJ0.54 UL

llJCStiBl liliM?liloill

ND(0.12U)0.24

ND(0.12U)0.39

ND(0.15U)

lifisiiiillilliiiilli

ND (0.36 U)ND (0.36 U)

0.90 J0.940.50

lii:Bl5:(dup>lllflP;2.5::^::>iliillliiu. -::1 ; ; ;?: :

ND (0.34 U)ND (0.34 U)

1.2J0.510.43

!!£kSHB^-6::W.?<00^-0.56

:i;;-;;!Zi8009'-^:;:;i:

ND (1.6U)ND (1-6U)

6.54.7

ND (1.6U)

KSHB-61.5-2.521 80 10

ND (0.88 U)ND (0.88 U)

4.41.4

ND (0.88 Ul_

KSHB-7 .0^0-0.50Z18007

ND (0.90 U)ND (0.90 U)ND (0.90 U)

3.5ND (0.90 U)

KSHB-70.50-1.0Z18008

ND (1.5 U)ND (1.5U)

8.72.6

ND (1.5U)

Notes:1 Showing only the results for compounds detected above quantltatlon limits.ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively Identified. However, the associated numerical value is an estimated concentration only.U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is the compound quantltation limit.


TABLE 3-15



SUMMARY OF DETECTEDTCL VOC, SVOC AND PESTICIDE RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES1 (mg/kg)

————————————————————————————LocationDepth (ft)Sample ID

VOCsacetonevinyl chloride

SVOCs

KSHB-51.5-2.5Z18012

0.012 J0.008 J

KSHB-52

1 .5 - 2.5 (Dup)Z18013

0.018 J0.008 J -

anthracenebenzo(a)anthracene

0.14 J 0.13 J1.3 [ 1.4 ;

benzo(b)fiuoranthene 2.4 2.3benzo(k)fluoranthenebenzo(a)pyrene

i butyl benzyl phthalatecarbazolechrysenedibenz(a.h) anthracenebis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalatefluorantheneindeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene2-methylnaphthalenenaphthalenephenanthrenepvrene

1.3 ; 1.31.3

0.26 J0.20 J

1.30.27 J0.69 J2.7 J

0.69 J0.10 J0.080 J

1.22.6

1.30.17 J0.20 J

1.20.32J0.882.5 J0.75 J0.13 J0.087 J

1.32.7

Pesticidesaldrinalpha-chlordanegamma-chlordane4,4-DDE

0.023 J0.0500.0490.048

0.023 J0.0420.040

0.032 JN

Notes:1 Showing only the results for compounds detected above quantltatlon limits.2 MS/MSD of this sample was analyzed.ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value

is an estimated concentration only.JN -The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there Is presumptive

evidence to made a tentative identification. The associated numerical value is anestimated concentration only.

U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is thecompound quantitation limit.


TABLE 3-16

ALLIED PAPER INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUNDSITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED TAL RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES' (mg/kg)

FF.DCRA!

LocationDepth(tt)Sample IDaluminum

KSHB-51.5 -2,52180122000 * J

KSHB-52

1.5-2.5{Dup)Z180136900 * J

arsenic : 10 * 15 *barium ! 71 BN* Jberylliumcadmiumcalcium

320 N* J0.45 B J 0.61 B J

ND(1.2U) 2.1 J5400 * J ! 22000 * J

chromium 12 N* J ! 41 N* J ;cobalt 3.8 B 5.8 Bcopperiron

25 N* J 91 N* J4300* 15000*

lead i 210*magnesiummanganesemercurynickelpotassiumseleniumvanadium

1400 J56 N* J

0.629.8 B

ND (310 U)0.42 B5.6 B

280*6100* J190 N* J

1.122

430 B0.72 B

18

Notes:1 Showing only the results for analytes detected above quantitation limits.2 MS/MSD of this sample was analyzed.ND - Not detected.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:B - The reported value was obtained from a reading less than the contract required

detection limit (CRDL) but greater than or equal to the instrument detectionlimit (IDL).

J - The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numerical valueis an estimated concentration only.

N - Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.U - The analyte was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is the analyte

contract required detection limit (CRDL).* - Duplicate analysis not within control limits.


TABLE 4-1

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGECREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTATIONSAND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORTOTAL PCB IN SOIL AND RESIDUALS


K:; f:(C'dmp6uHd::::;:. :

^^•^•Î^^S 'i;;;:;;;?;;;:::Fr$qUency, :;:;.::!:::::::i;;::;;:of:i3etectlbr1:-i:^;?5

'iii iiiflairii'g'fi'ci'iillll;l::bb:nce^ntratioftll|:i;l f ;;;:{mri/ka:r ;lll

:; ::: : :o::: :':<": :;-:::>x::'::'.'-:r '• ': ' ' :•

W&^tf^.-.^<^-:^''-- '.-:-:.'• - . - ' .

lIlllAviage":;::: i:liJllnbiiViiratton2

lilli|rtia/k?3y:::' : •'••'•

MDNR Act 307 Type BCleanup Criteria3

Direct Contact Value- : • • . ' ; . - • : (mq/kq)

MDNR Act 307Generic IndustrlalType C

Cleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact Value{mg/kg)

Lagoon-Related Samples: Surficial1 Soil/ResidualsTotal PCB 4/5 ND - 110 24 1.0(3) 7.5(1)

Lagoon-Related Samples: Native SoilTotal PCB 5/5 0.043 - 2.9 1.1 1 .0 (2) 7.5

: - ;". : •• ,: " :' ;• :':. :- '•' .• '• ••:-.'• . : ' • : ' '-:': ': :-. : -' .• : : • ::;: • .-. : - • • •• :.::-.\;: ::- : . •:•: ;j _

'^:^Sa^6:MM

:;; ;:y;;totavpCB ;|iiil;:s;!Gbhce:htraitibl§iil|r-:>;iiH(mfl/kdJi;iill

;MitMR Act 307 Type BIpjiiSiltU^ Criteria3

lf>iiif Contact ValueIlllPiiima^di : : :!

MDNR Act 307Generic IndustrlalType C

Cleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact Value(mo/kq)

Wastewater- Related SampleGPC-1 0.15 1.0 7.5

Stormwater-Related SampleGPD-1 0.65 1.0 7.5

Additional SampleGPP-1 0.15 1.0 7.5

Notes:1 0.0- to 0.5-foot bgs Interval.2 Arithmetic mean concentration (one-half the detection limit used as a proxy concentration for non-detects).3 From MDNR, 1994a. The number In parenthesis representsthe number of samples exceeding the criterion.4 From MDNR, 1994c. The number In parenthesis representsthe number of samples exceeding the criterion.Lagoon-related samples are from locations GPL-1 through GPL-5.ND - Not detected.

1994667LOT Revision No.: 0 1of 1 29-Dec-94

TABLE 4-2



SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORPCDD/PCDF IN STORMWATER-RELATED SAMPLE


•i isypp fm&iHi- ;!;;:;:'-:'.;K &!;;?:!;;::fp;£f;itii ;;:;;:;;:i;;:;p||J;:::;;.;!;;:;:;::: ;;;;;|:|;::;;:

•:•: .•,;: /'I'v/Xv:-: ••••'••'••.'• '•• '"';' ••':••••,': •'•:'•:• • ••'••• '- •' '•• :'••::-.'-•':• '••':•••.•••

]<tm^ -£oiti$tiuMmM:

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDDOCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDFOCDF

^mzmjCDomtmmii;i.;;To>cicity;;;i;:y;:i;:if;Eqli)vale iSylypyi\W.^ttic^mmm:

0.10.1

0.010.001

0.10.10.10.010.01

0.001

•^••:-mi^ffmV^^§^&î^''::-:-:^ i :: m i mmi m mmmiii$8mwmfi > -;: ; - . •-. .,...:;:.

, : : ' - - : : • ' • • : : J ;: •:•:; :: :; ; :: :: ; ; . O CII.Up.llH|.::::: : : :::$

C^Brtcititratiibiiiipiiiliii:;

1.4 E-63.8 E -69.7 E-56.0 E-4

2.9 E-62.0 E-61.1 E-61.1 E-58.8 E-73.5 E-5

Total TCDD - Equivalent Concentration

llICDDiEqulvalent: :S iijehtrWIon2 (ma/kg)

1.4 E-73.8 E-79.7 E-76.0 E-7

2.9 E-72.0 E-71.1 E-71.1 E-78.8 E-93.5 E-8

2.8 E-6

MDNRAct307type B'Cleaoup Criteria3

! Direct Contact Valuef Value '(mg/kg)

1.3E-51.3E-51.3E-51..3E-5

1.3E-51.3E-51.3E-51.3E-51.3E-51.3E-5

1>3E-5

MDNRAct307 |Generic Industrial

Type C Cleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact ValueValue '(ma/kg)

2.0E-42.0E-42.0E-42.0E-4

2.0E-42.0E-42.0E-42.0E-42.0E-42.0E-4

2.0E-4

Notes:^rom USEPA, 1989a.2 Concentrations are the sample concentration multiplied by the appropriate TCDD toxicity equivalency factor.3 From MDNR, 1994a.4 From MDNR, 1994c.


TABLE 4-3

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAOE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORTOTAL PCB IN SOIL AND RESIDUALS


i'S^Gorrijpotmd:-:^'

,;!: ;;;;;:;';; ;;!;:;•;;:';;.;:;;;! hi ;;;!!: ;!;;;:!:

:::j;:;:;Freq'uency:;y;i::;SV:Of:D«tectibriiH;:i5

:;.;:i;:::-.;.F|ange:i6f;;:;::;||;;;:iipncentrati<:;iniai;:|;i:MS.^(triQ/\(di^fîM

.:; ;; w|'|j;|; :;;;-:: ;:•:;;;::.::

;;|l!i* ;;« f*g*;i: • ; . ; : : ; ; : . ; : : •:|||;|§||eiir?tl§ri?ii?;::ii imteBB]?«S':^yvh';v

M.DNR Act 307 Type BCleanup Criteria'

Direct Contact Value: (ma/kcri •

MDNRAct307Generic Industrial Type C

Cleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact Value(ma/kfl)

Lagoon- Related Samples: Surficla!1 Soil/Residuals

Total PCS 2/5 ND - 0.040 0.031 1.0 I 7.5

Lagoon— Related Samples: Native Soil

Total PCB 5/5 ND-0.12 0.067 1.0 | 7.5

Warehouse Construction Site Samples

Total PCB 4/7 ND-1.8 0.37 1.0(1) 7.5

'•'i;83ii;Sa"rriiJfe&lll:i

j;PTotai pcBiii*!:|i;:£ori (itrM ll[WSMM^^M

Iiiillll7:-lfpe:;i;:Mii ijl i trs*!;-:.!;;-DlrdctCohtact Value

;. : : : ; : ; : MDNR Act 307; •iSeheric Industrial type C

Cleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact Value-•••••::::;;:: trng/Wf-

Wastewater— Related SamplesSPC-1SPC-2SPI-1

0.742401.4

1.01.0(*)i.on

7.57.5 (*)

7.5

Aeration Basin— Related SamplesSPL-6 (O'-O.S1)SPL-6 (2'-4')

0.27ND

1.01.0

7.57.5

Stormwater— Related Sample

SPD-1 3.9 1 (*) 7.5

Notes:1 0.0- to 0.5-foot bgs Interval.2 Arithmetic mean concentration (one-half the detection limit used as a proxy concentration for non-detects).3 From MDNR, 1994a. Number In parenthesis represents the number of samples exceeding the criterion.4FromMDNR, 1994c.(*) - Sample exceeds the criterion.ND - Not detected.Lagoon-related samples are from locations SPL-1, SPL-2, SPL-4, SPL-11, and SPL-13.

2094667LOT Revision No.: 0 1of 1 29-Dec-94

TABLE 4-4



SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORPCDD/PCDF IN STORMWATER-RELATED SAMPLE


•MMM9&ti&&M!ii$%3t%:;nl!lliJllil:lillli1'::;i :1iPlii i*?fl!} m illlii £6 rfijfi6(Jhd:l;i;.;;;!;::;l:; I

2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDDOCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDFOCDF

mmmJGQD^mm'^WMfdtidtyMWmi&ti&ffi&tifyKmnmm^^MHmmm

1.00.10.10.1

0.010.001

0.10.050.50.1

. 0.10.1

0.010.01

0.001

^îl^KiS^^^^^^^^KS^mWf^^ '• ::i-.i.V\i;'- •: : •: • ' : ! - • • : ::

.'If PI liillllilil ^ : : ; : ; : : --; ';^P^^^B1^^^rt^&sm^:.^;-'-:::f:>..:-;:îm^m^SMpWiimm:i56ri&Siittra iiMili:s

5.1E-52.9E-44.5E-41.4E-41.4E-21.9E-1

6.5E-44.7E-55.0E-51.7E-43.8E-56.0E-59.4E-48.6E-52.5E-3

Total TCDD-Equlvalent Concentration

IflfTCDD Equivalent ;;:;i$DnSeritration? ( mo/ka)

5.1E-52.9E-54.5E-51.4E-51.4E-41.9E-4

6.5E-52.4E-62.5E-51.7E-53.8E-66.0E-69.4E-68.6E-72.5E-6

6.0E-4

; MDNRACt307Type B Cleanup Criteria3

Direct Contact-:V;;-;:;-i:Vafue (mg/kg) :-:" ' . ' :•

1.3E-51.3E-5

MDNRAC1307Generic Industrial


Direct ContactValue (mg/k^)

2.0E-42.0E-4

1.3E-5 2.0E-41.3E-5 2.0E-41.3E-51.3E-5

1.3E-51.3E-51.3E-51.3E-51.3E-5

2.0E-42.0E-4

2.0E-42.0E-42.0E-42.0E-42.0E-4

1.3E-5 2.0E-41.3E-5 i 2.0E-41.3E-5 2.0E-41.3E-5 ; 2.0E-4

1.3E-5 2.0E-4

Notes:USEPA, 1989a.

2 Concentrations are the sample concentration multiplied by the appropriate TCDD toxicity equivalency factor.3 From MDNR, 1994a.4 From MDNR, 1994c.

1294667LOS Revision No.: 0 of1 28-Dec-94

TABLE 4-5

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOORIVERSUPERFUNDSITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORTOTAL PCB IN SOIL AND RESIDUALS


?ll£:Com:iiJbuM;-|!:'iJ: ;Fre<}uWicy.N!P

of Detection;

i;;L:::y|:Ranc|e:ctf|i 11;:;:::&:flcentraiii$li

ll|i;Ayerage •li rtcehtration2 ; :Illljma/kg) , .


Direct Contact Value(mq/kq)

MDNR Act 307Generic Industrial Type C

Cleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact Value(mq/kaV i

Lagoon -Related Sam pies: Surficial1 Soil/ResidualsTotal PCB 1/2 ND-79 40 1.0(1) [ 7.5 m

Lagoon— Related Samples: Native SoilTotal PCB 1/2 ND- 1.2 0.62 1.0(1) L 7.5

''.'. ;.:'.| ':.;•:" :!': i"::;i:-::::;;:"::i:::-;:'^:::::;-;::v: ":': : -. : •::'•'-'• ~~ ' • • ' : ' • " ' ••-,'.'"•"•'. -.'•'• •'- '-•'••,••'•: :•

'^^;' ••'•• My .::i^WM'yMMMs^^tlmM

i%^ Tnfai 'Jprpt S I.: s :: ::••:• '•• :• 1 ULal r \>P...:;:::;:::::::;::>:::

W^3t^r&î9

MDNR Act 307 TypeB|^DNi}Act307TypeBIllCpanup Criteria3

liitreM Contact Valuei«i;:??::(rna/kp.V ••:.<


Cleanup Criteria^Direct Contact Value

(mq/kq)

Wastewater-Related SamplesKM-2(0.0'-0.5')KM -2(3.5' -4.0')KMS-1

0.43ND7.5

1.01.0

1.0(*)

7.57.57.5

Stormwater- Related Sample |KMD-1 0.17 1 7.5 ___

Notes:1 0.0- to 0.5-foot bgs interval.2 Arithmetic mean concentration (one-half the detectton limit used as a proxy concentration for non-detects).3 From MDNR, 1994a. Number in parenthesis represents the number of samples exceeding the criterion.4 From MDNR, 1994C. Number in parenthesis represents the number of samples exceeding the criterion.(*) - Sample exceeds the criterion.ND - Not detected.Lagoon-related samples are from locations KM-4 and KM-7.

2194667LOT Revtelon No.: 0 1 of 1 29-Dec-94

TABLE 4-6

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEWALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORPCDD/PCDFINSTORMWATER-RELATED SAMPLE

DRAF1 FORS T A T E A N O

Compound2,3,7,8-TCDD1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD1, 2,3,4,7,8- HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9- HxCDD1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8- HpCDDOCDD

2,3,7, 8-TCDF1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF1, 2,3,4,7,8- HxCDF1, 2,3,6,7,8- HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8- HxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF1, 2,3,4,7,8,9 -HpCDFOCDF

TCDDToxicity

EquivalencyFactor'

1.00.50.10.10.10.010.001

0.10.050.50.10.10.10.010.010.001

. . . ..f:.,.::::.::K::.vM::v:;:::..:.:.: :-.:-:- :: :': - - . : : : : .' : • • ' • • : : j :> : • ::.f H S : H :™:™SBS/ : ; i : ' : ; : : : : : . - • ' • •

.:'''':':: rilll*bW:::;::- "• ' ,-..' ; : Sa7np|0:.:!llCbhc ritr lilll

:^ (mci/k :llil9.7E-61.1E-62.3E-66.8E-64.6E-62.1E-42.3E-3

2.1E-51.6E-6Z9E-66.3E-62.8E-62.5E-6Z7E-5Z8E-61.1E-4

Total TCDD-Equivalent Concentration

iHPPP EquivalentlllliDdhcentration3

Ilil;frriq/ka)9.7E-65.5E-72.3E-76.8E-74.6E-7

MDNRAct307Type B Cleanup Criteria4

Direct ContactValue

(mpykal1.3E-51.3E-51.3E-5

MDNRAct307Generic Industrial


Direct ContactValue

(mo/kg)2.0E-42.0E-42.0E-4

1.3E-5 2.0E-41.3E-5 2.0E-4

2.1E-6 1.3E-5 2.0E-42.3E-6 1.3E-5 2.0E-4

21E-6 1.3E-5 2.0E-41.6E-7 1.3E-5 2.0E-41.5E-6 1.3E-5 2.0E-46.3E-7 1.3E-5 2.0E-42.8E-7 1.3E-5 2.0E-42.5E-7 I 1.3E-5 2.0E-4Z7E-72.8E-81.1E-7

2.1E-5

1.3E-5 2.0E-41.3E-5 ZOE-41.3E-5 2.0E-4

1.3E-5 2.0E-4

Notes:1 From USEPA, 1989a.1 Arithmetic mean of sample and its duplicate (one-half the detection limit used as a proxy concentration for non -detects).3 Concentrations are the sample concentration multiplied by the appropriate TCDD toxicity equivalency factor.4 From MDNR, 1994a.5 From MDNR, 1994C.

ND - Not detected.

1794667LOS Revision No.: 0 1 ofl 29-Dec-94

TABLE 4-7

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEKyKALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE


SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORTOTAL PCB IN RESIDUALS

D R A T ] rnr.;STATE ANDr E D r R A .R E V I E W

Sample

Total PCBConcentration

(mq/kgV


Direct Contact Value(mq/kq)

. . - " . • - . -MDNR Act 307

Generic Industrial Type CCleanup Criteria2

Direct Contact Value(mq/kaV

Wastewater- Related Samples

MM-1MM-2

NDND

1.01.0

7.57.5

Notes:MDNR, 1994a.

2 From MDNR, 1994C.ND - Not detected.


TABLE 4-8



SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORTOTAL PCB IN SURFICIAL1 SOIL/RESIDUALS

D R A F T FORSTATE ANDFEDERALREVIEW

Total PCB5

t;;: tequeH<5y'::§!i;f:

7/7

^^^W^WmiiiiM:^n^m^mim$$i

îjîijji:?fCbnce:hitfa:tiohlll

0.37 - 11

llsiiriBentration2

Ilirtla/kaV :

4.2

MDNR Act 307 TypeBCleanup Criteria3

Direct Contact Value(ma/ka)

1 (5)

MONRAct307Generic industrial

TypeCCleanup Criteria4

Direct Contact Value(ma/ka)

7.5(1)

Notes:1 0.0- to 0.5-foot bgs Interval.2 Arithmetic mean concentration (one-half the detection limit used as a proxy concentration for non-detects).3 MDNR, 1994a. The number in parenthesis represents the number of samples exceeding the criterion.4 MDNR, 1994c. The number In parenthesis represents the number of samples exceeding the criterion.5 Samples are from locations KSHB-1 through KSHB-7.


TABLE 4-9


MILL INVESTIGATIONS .LKING STREET STORM SEWER

SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIA FORTCL VOC, SVOC, AND PESTICIDES IN SOIL SAMPLE1

Compound

KSHB-5Concentration2

._. . (mg/kg] _____


Direct Contact Value(mq/kq}


Cleanup Criteria*Direct Contact Value

(mq/kq)

VOCs

i acetonevinyl chloride

0.015 7.8E + 3 1.5E + 4L 0.008 i 0.18 1.1

SVOCs

anthracene 0.14 2.6E + 5benzo(a)anthracenebenzo(b)fluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthenebenzo(a)pyrenebutyl benzyl phthalatecarbazolechrysenedibenz(a,h)anthracenebis(z-ethylhexyl)phthalatefluorantheneindeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene2-methylnaphthalenenaphthalenephenanthrenepyrene

1.42.41.31 TI .0

0.220.20

1.30.300.792.6

0.720.12

0.0841.32.7

1.81-8(*)18

0.18 (*)4.1E + 4

NA180

0.18 (*)92

3.1E+41.8

ID9.3E + 3

9301.9E+4

9.0E+52121

2102.1

1.4E + 5NA

2.1E + 32.1

ID1.1E+5

21ID

3.2E + 43.2E + 36.7E + 4

Pesticides

aldrinalpha-chlordanegamma-chlordane4^4' -DDE

0.0230.0460.0440.040

0.07611

3.8

0.88121244

Notes:1 1.5- to 2.5-foot bgs interval.2 Arithmetic mean of sample and its duplicate (one-half the detection limit used as a proxy concentration for

non-detects).3 From MDNR, 1994a and 1994b."From MDNR, 1994c.ID - Inadequate data to develop criterion.(*) - Sample exceeds criterion.NA - Not available.


TABLE 4-10



SUMMARY OF DETECTED CONCENTRATIONS AND CLEANUP CRITERIATAL IN SOIL SAMPLE1

DRAF! FORSTATE ANDFEDERA1REVIEW

• • • • '• • • ' ' • - • • ' • • : ' - ' - - - . ' . - ' - - ' . '/.•:>"."."."; .' . . . . ;'; : • • : • ; . ; • • '•'•:

•-•:•'-'•: :-:-:: .-"•:•• • ' '^TACAnalyte^;:'v;';::':-';X:;:::':

aluminumarsenicbariumberylliumcadmiumcalciumchromium5

cobaltcopperironleadmagnesiummanganesemercury*nickelpotassiumseleniumvanadium

i;::;--'v','-:.i':kSHB~S:;-,:.::'-./:'':-'--:Concentration*

•^•^^lmQ(m^--:^--

445012

1950.53

1.313700

265.058

9650245

3750123

0.8616

2920.57

12


Di rect Contact Value(mg/kg)

ID0.72 (*)

1.8E + 4NA

1.3E + 2NA

1.2E + 3NA

9.8E + 3ID

4.0E + 2NA

1.2E + 378

2.0E + 4NA

1.3E+32.2E+3

^^•tHOt^^l^Default Type A Spit ;

::v;:;-::::Cleanup:CrlteilBrf;:;ii;s;^>?^;fagi\^^M:££-

69005.8 (*)7.5 (*)NA1.2(*)NA18(*)

6.832(*)

1200021 (*)NA

4400.13 (*)

20NA

0.41 (*)NA

Notes:1 1.5- to 2.5-foot bgs interval.2 Arithmetic mean of sample and its duplicate (one-half the detection limit used as a proxy concentration fornon-detects).

3 From MDNR, 1994a.4 From MDNR, 1993.5 Chromium reported as total, Type B criteria based on hexa-chromium, Type A soil criterion based on total.6 Type B criterion based on inorganic mercury.NA - Not available.(*) - Sample exceeds criteria.ID - Inadequate data to develop criteria.

1894667LOT Revision No.: 0 of1 29-Dec-94

Figures

SIMPSON PLAINWELLPAPER COMPANY MILL

LAKE SUPERIOR

t*4982XOIV»4 M-HV *KHBH4O4\64SHOO2-O»0

LAKE HURON

ALLEGAN COUNTY

KALAMAZOO COUNTY

LAKE ERIE

MICHIGANNOT TO SCALE

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATIONKALAMAZOO MILL

FORMER KING MILLKING STREET STORM SEWER

PORTAGE PAPER COMPANY MILL

FORMER MONARCH MILL


ALLEGAN AND KALAMAZOO COUNTY MAPPING PROVIDED BYMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM.

5 MILES

SCALE

10 MILES

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS A SCIENTISTS______

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC. / PORTAGE CREEK /

KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 15

MILL MVCSTTOATIONS

LOCATION PLANFIGURE

-2B

LEGENDNEW BORING/CORE FORVISUAL ANALYSIS ONLYNEW BORING/CORE

GRAB SAMPLE

RAILROAD TRACKS

APPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF FORMER STRUCTURESOR LAGOONS

LOCATION OF CURRENTSTRUCTURES

KING STREETSTORM SEWER

2/«4 34-NES AK+585404/64583001 .0*0

FORMER LAGOON fl

FORMER LAGOON #2

FORMERMILL f 2r FORMER LAGOON |4 /•<

GEORGIA-PACIFICCORPORATION

MILL f 1/ FORMER /

/ MILL f5/

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1 - 300'

KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OU

KALAMAZOO METALRECYCLERS

FORMER NATIONALGYPSUM COMPANY

CURRENTLY OWNED IP OF KALAMAZOO


H,GHWAY (M-96) BRIDGE

NOTES:1. BASE MAP LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROMSURVEY INFORMATION (ON STATE PLANECOORDINATE SYSTEM) GENERATED BYBLASLAND, BOUCK te LEE, INC. ONJUNE 14, 1994.

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.________ENGINEERS ie SCIENTISTS_______

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC. / PORTAGE CREEK /

KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUNO SITETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM IS

MILL INVESTIGATIONS

GEORGIA-PACIFIC MILLSAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE

2

SHORT STREET

-FORMER DEWATERINGLAGOONS

PLAINWELLWASTEWATERTREATMENT

PLANT

-ACTIVATED SLUDGE TANK

OUTFALL

PLANSCALE: 1" = 100'

TRANSFORMERS— HYDROELECTRIC\ PLANT-

PRIMARY CLARIFIER

SECONDARY CLARIFIER

BASINR AERA710N I—— SECONDARY CLARIFIERASN (OUT OF SERVICE)

00 RIVER

SIMPSON PLAINWELLPAPER CO. MILL

DEWATERING SYSTEM

-\ r

12/»4 54-PMC *K84514404/B4514C03.DWG

PLANSCALE: 1M = 250'

LEGEND:AGPL-2* NEW BOR)NG FOR VISUAL

v ANALYSIS ONLY

4?PL~1 NEW BORING

46PD-1 GRAB SAMPLE

FORMER DEWATERING LAGOONSINTERPRETED FROM AERIALPHOTOGRAPHS (1955. 1960. 1967.1974, 1981. 1986 AND 1991)

LOCATION OF CURRENT STRUCTURE

RAILROAD TRACKS

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFWAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION SITESAMPLING, SEE FIGURE 8 FORSAMPLING LOCATIONS.111

NOTES:1. SAMPLE LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

2. BASE MAP DIGITIZED FROM AERIALPHOTOGRAPHS. LOCATIONS AREAPPROXIMATE.


BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC. 7 PORTAGE CREEK /

KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM IS

MILL INVESTIGATIONS

SIMPSON PLAINWELL MILLSAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE

3

PROPOSED WASTEWATER DRAINSOUDS SAMPLE

NOTE:

1. BASE MAP LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS DESIGNATE PROPOSEDSAMPLES; SAMPLES WERE NOT COLLECTED.

MILL C"

DISCONTINUED IN 1989

VALVE CLOSED 1989AFTER MILL SHUT DOWN

FACILITY DRAINAGE TO FILTER PLANTAND MILLSTO POTW SANITARY

SEWER (OUTFALL 001)

SCHEMATIC DRAFT FORSTATE ANDFEDERALREVIEW

SITE PLANAPPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" - 200'

(SEE ENLARGED FACILITY DRAINAGE SCHEMATIC ABOVE)2/M M-MtC AK

&43S14O4/S4M1QO4.MIC

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC.ENGINEERS A SCIENTISTS


KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUNO SITETECHMCAL MEMORANDUM 15

MILL MVCSTMATIONS

PORTAGE PAPER MILLPROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE

4

KALAMAZOOCITY

YARDS

FORMERKING MILL

o£TV

KM-2

LEGEND

NEW BORING FORVISUAL ANALYSIS ONLY

NEW BORING

GRAB SAMPLE

\- RAILROAD TRACKS-/ —— I

—————— APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFFORMER STRUCTURES

100-_____0_____100'_____2001

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" - 200'

NOTES:BASE MAP BASED UPON 1973 USGS 7.5MINUTE SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND HIGHALTITUDE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN IN1955 AND 1974. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROMSURVEY INFORMATION GENERATED BY BLASLAND,BOUCK tc LEE, INC.. LOCATION OF FORMERSTRUCTURES AND LAGOONS APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATION KMS-1 IS NOT SHOWN,SEE FIGURE 7.

3. SAMPLE LOCATION KMD-1 IS

STATE ANDFEDERALREVIEW

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS * SCIENTISTS

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC. J PORTAGE CREEK /

KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUNO StTETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM IS

MILL INVESTIGATIONS

FORMER KING MILLSAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE

5

71 FORMERMONARCH

MILL

RAILROAD TRACKSAND RIGHT-OF-WAY

MM-1LEGEND

NEW BORING

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFFEATURES PRESENT ONLY ON1955 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

LOCATION OF CURRENTSTRUCTURE OR FEATURE

WATER OR DRAINAGE

20tr 200*

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" 20O'


NOTES:1. BASE MAP PREPARED USING

4/17/91 AND 7/12/55 AERIALPHOTOGRAPHS. LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONSFROM SURVEY INFORMATION (ONSTATE PLANE COORDINATESYSTEM) GENERATED BYBLASLAND. BOUCK it LEE, INC.

12/»4 54-NES A*

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC.ENGINEERS A SCIENTISTS

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC// PORTAGE CREEK /


MILL. MVESTMATONS

FORMER MONARCH MILLSAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE

6

KSHB-3KSHB-11

KIHG STREETSTORM SEWER

KSHB-4BRICK HEADWALL

KING HIGHWAYLANDFILL OU


LEGEND

-(fe-KSHB-8 NEW BORING FORv VISUAL ANALYSIS ONLY

AKSHB-1

A.KMS-1

X

B-3

19

-—— 770 ---

NEW BORING

GRAB SAMPLE

EXISTING SOIL BORING

EXISTING SURFACESOIL SAMPLE

RAILROAD TRACKS

ELEVATION CONTOUR(NGVD 1929)

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 40'

NOTES:

1. BASE MAP BY GOVE ASSOCIATES, INC., 8/31/89(TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ENVIRONMENTALRESOURCES MANAGEMENT. SHEET 1). LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM SURVEY DRAFT FORINFORMATION (ON STATE PLANE STATE ANDCOORDINATE SYSTEM) GENERATED BY prnFRAIBLASLAND. BOUCK it LEE. INC. Rr\/IFW

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.________ENGINEERS A SCIENTISTS________



______MILL INVESTIGATIONS______

KING STREET STORM SEWERSAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE

SPW_2 ASPHALT

* SPW-18

SPW-12 _

SPW-13

SPW-17

CONCRETE

SPW-16

• SWL-3• SWL-2• SWL-1 •

SPW-15

SPW-14

I ———————————— T=F

LLOADING DOCK

BUILDING

I

sN SPW-19^\

SPW-8 \ \v

spw-11 V^^ y^s^^-/ Vr\SPW-7 \ \^

^SPW-10 \ A

*W-6 LJ \

^SPW-5 \ I \

SPW-21 / \ \

\ j 1SPW-3 SPW-4 \_^/ |

• SPW-1• • SPI-1

SPG-3

^ ———— FORMER RETAINING WALL

PLAN

1

/

1

|

LEGEND: N.T.S. STATE AND

•SPW-3 SAMPLING LOCATION FEDERAL

NOTES:1. FACILITY AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS ARE

APPROXIMATE

2. SAMPLING WAS NOT REQUIRED BY THE RI/FAS OUTLINED IN THE WORK PLAN

3. SAMPLING PERFORMED ON SEPTEMBER 21,OCTOBER 6, AND OCTOBER 12. 1994.

12/«* 34-ttX AX8451+4O4/S4-5HSCW.DWG

———————————————— ^^^ ————————————————— ,

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS te SCIENTISTS

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPS A L L I E D PAPER, INC. / PORTAGE CREEK /


MILL INVESTIGATIONS

SIMPSON PLAINWELL MILL FIGUREWAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION QSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS °

GPL-2

>epth {ft)0-0.5 (S)3.5-1.5 (R)1.5-2.5 (S)

3CB Cone.[mgAg)6.65.3D.47

GPL-1ORMER LAGOON

GPL-3

3epth (ft)0-0.5 (R)3.5-4.5 (R)4.5-5 (S)

PCB Cone.(mg/kg)0.20700.78

OPL-5

3epth (tt)0-0.5 (S)0.5-0.75 (S/R)3.75-2 (S)

3CB Cone(mgAg)5.93.40.043

GPD-1

Compound2378-Tetrox*ilorlnated dibenzofuron123478-Hexochlorinated dibenzofuran123678-Hexachlorinated dibenzofuron1 23478-Hexochlorinated dibenzo-p-dtoxin1 23678- Hexochlorinoted dibenzo-p-dioxin1234678-Heptachlorinated dibenzofuran1234678-Heptochlorinoted dibenzo-p-dioxin1 234789— Heptachlorinated dibenzofuronOctochlorinated dbenzo-p-dloxlnOctochlorinoted dibenzofuran

Cone.(mgAg)2.9E-62.0E-6 JPR1.1E-61.4E-63.8E-61.1E-59.7E-58.8E-76.0E-43.5E-5

GPP-1

3epth (n)Solids

PCB Cone.(mgAg)0.15

CPL-4

3epth (ft)3-0.5 (R)0-0.5 (R)0.5-1 (S)3.5-1 (S)

PCB Cone.(mgAg)NONLXdup)1.20.94(dup)

GPC-1

Jepth (tt)3-1 (S)

=CB Cone[mgAg)3.15

KWO STREETSTORM SEWER

LEGENDGPL-2B NEW BORING/CORE FOR

VISUAL ANALYSIS ONLYCPL—1

NEW BORING/CORE

GRAB SAMPLE

RAILROAD TRACKS

APPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF FORMER STRUCTURESOR LAGOONSLOCATION OF CURRENTSTRUCTURES

300*

PR

(S)

(R)

LAYERS OFF; Rff.SAMPLES12/M S4-AK64M5404/

FORMER LAGOONFORMER LAGOON <4

FORMERMILL *2

1« !——FORMER LAGOON f6 \

INLET TO KALAUAZOOWATER RECLAMATION

FORMERPRMARY .CLARHTER /

IN USE) GEORGIA-PACIFIC^CORPORATION

MILL f 1/ FORMER /

MILL #5/"WJ

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1 - 300

1KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OU


FORMER NATIONALGYPSUM COMPANY

DRAFT FORSTATE AND

HIGHWAY (M-96) FEDERALREVIEWNOTES:

1. BASE MAP LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INCENGINEERS Se SCIENTISTS

KEYND NOT DETECTED

THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED.HOWCVER, THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

THE REPORTED CONCENTRATION MAY BEUNDERESTIMATED DUE TO A POORLY RESOLVEDGAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC PEAK.

SOIL SAMPLE

RESIDUALS SAMPLE

(dup) DUPLICATE

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM SURVEYINFORMATION (ON STATE PLANECOORDINATE SYSTEM) GENERATED BYBLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. ONJUNE 14, 1994.

3. SAMPLE RESULTS AS REPORTED BYAQUATEC, INC.. 1994 AND TRIANGLELABS, 1994.



MILL INVESTIGATIONS

\\ \ \ \

GEORGIA-PACIFIC MILRESIDUALS/SOIL PCB

AND PCDD/PCDF DATA

FIGURE

9

9"W~1Z

3eoth(fO3.0-0.5

1 ppminterpretation«

25 ppminterpretation4A

3ep«i (n)5.0-0.5

SPW-W1 ppmn wr i>r *toUon40

Z5 ppmnterpretotion40

SWM7

iepth (ft)3.0-0.5).0-0.5(dup)

1 ppmnterpretatianNDND

26 ppmnterpretation40ND

SWM3

:>epth (ft)3.0-0.5

1 ppmn tvprototion

NO

25 ppmnterpretation4A

SPW-; (Lot)Jepth (ft)3.0-0.52.0-Z54.5-5.0

3C8 (moAa)»4040

SPW-16

iepth (ft)3.0-0.5

1 ppmnterpretation

NO

25 ppmnterpretotlon«3

SW.-3

Itoth (ft)Composite Sample

I ppminterpretation40

25 ppmnterpretatlan«

SW.-2

)epth (ft)irob Sample

1 ppminterpretation«

25 ppmnterpretotlon40

Jepm (ft)

SPW-15

Jepth (ft)3.0-0.6

1 ppmnterpretationID

IS, ppmnterpretatlan«

SPW-14

3epth (ft)3.0-0.5

1 ppmnterpretotlon4D

25 ppmnterpretotlonMD

SPW-21

iepth (ft)3.0-0.5

1 ppmnterpretation<4D

Z5 ppmnterpretation40

SPW-3

3epth (ft)3.0-0.53.0-0.5(dup)2.0-2.54.0-4.5

1 ppminterpretation>1>14D

ND

25 ppmnterpretotlon4D

404D

Jepth (n)3.0-0.5

SPW-1SI ppmntwpretouon40

25 ppmnterpretatlan4D

3epth (103.0-0.5

SP»-»1 ppmnicrpret a ttoo>i

29 ppmnterpretation4A

f SPW-SIDepth (H)|o.0-0.5

I ppmnterprttotlon>1

25 ppmnterpretation•M

SPW-11

)«pth (n)3.0-0.5

ppmntflTpretatfonND

25 ppmntcrpretationNA

LEGEND:SPW-3

SPW-7

Dtpth (ft)0.0-0.52.0-2.5k.0-4.5

I ppmnt*ror«ldtlon>1NDND

25 ppmnt«fpr«totlonÂ4A4A

SAMPUNG LOCATION

SOIL PILE

SPW-10

Jepth (ft)3.0-0.5

1 ppmnttrpntotkxi40

23 ppmnterpretation•4A

KEYNDNALab(dup)

J

SP*-i>

)epth (ft)1.0-0.52.0-2.54.0-4.5

ppmnterpretatlan>1Ce

»ppmnterpretotlen4AM4A

SPW-5

)epth (n)3.0-0.52.0-2.5t.0-4.5

1 ppmntwpretatlon>1NDND

25 ppmnterpretatlcnNANANA

SPW-+

?B£th_(ft)XO-0.52.0-2.54.0-4.5

1 ppmnterpretatlon4DNDrt>

25 ppmnterpretatkin40404D

SP6-1

3epth (ft)3.0-0.5

I ppmnterpretationNO

25 ppmnterpretation4D

STO-3

3epth (ft)3.O-0.5

1 ppmnterpretationNO

25 ppmnterpretation40

SPG-2

3epth!lft)3.0-0.5

1 ppmnterpretation«3

25 ppmnterpretotlonNO

SPW- (W>)3epth (ft)3.0-0.53.0-0.5(dup)2.0-2.54.5-5.0

>C8 (maAo)3.037 J3.024 J3.26 J3.20 J

PLAN

NOT DETECTEDNOT ANALYZEDLABORATORY SAMPLE RESULTDUPLICATE SAMPLE

THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELYIDENTIFIED; HOWEVER. THEASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUE ISAN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATIONONLY.

NOTES:

1. FACILITY AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS AREAPPROXIMATE.

2. ENSYS CORPORATION PCB RISc™IMMUNOASSAY TEST KIT RESULTS.SPW-1. SPW-2 AND SPW-6LABORATORY RESULTS ASREPORTED BY QUANTERRAENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. 1994.

3. SAMPLING WAS NOT REQUIRED BY THERI/FS OUTLINED IN THE WORK PLAN.

4. SAMPLING PERFORMED ON SEPTEMBER 21,OCTOBER 6, AND OCTOBER 12, 1994.


N.T.S

12/94 34-YCC AK(45144O4/S4S14COS.DW5

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS A SCIENTISTS


KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

MILL INVESTIGATIONS15

SIMPSON PLAINWELL MILLWAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION SITE

PCB RESULTS

FIGURE

11

12/»4 84 MS ,

KING HKSHWAY (M-9gL

KMD-1

)epth (ft)Sediment

EAST

KMD-1•_

VINE

PCS Cone

0.17

ST.

X

CLARiFIER A

KM-2

>epjh (ft)0-0.5 (S)3.5-4 (S)

PCB Cone[mgAg)D.43^D

OARinER B•KM-8

UKM-3

u—

FORMERKING MILL

\KM\5

KU-4

)«pth (tt))-0.5 (R)3-0.5 (R)1.5-2 (S)

'CB Cone.

ST.

KMD-1

Compound2378-Tetrochlorinated dbenzc— p-dloxhi2378— Tetrochlorlnated dbenzofuran12378— Pentochlorinoted dlbenzofuran12378— Pentochlorinoted dlbenzo— p— dloxin23478-Pentachlorlnoted dlbenzofuron123478— HexacNorlnated dibenzofuron123678— Hexochlorlnated dlbenzofuran123478-HexocHorinated dlbenzo-p-dk>xin123678-Hexachlorhated dlbenzo-p-dioxln123789-Hexachlorbated dlbenzo-p-dloxln234678-Hexachlorinated dlbenzofuran1 234678-Heptochlorlnoted dlbenzofuran1 234678-Heptochlorlnoted dibenzo-p-dloxln1234789-Heptochlorlnated dibenzofuronDctachlorlnated dtoenzo— p— dtoxinOctachlortnated dfbenzofuron2378— Tetrachlorlnated dbenzo—p— dloxin2378-Tetrochtorinated dbenzofuran12378-Pentochlorlnated dlbenzofuran12378-Pentochlorlnated dlbenzo-p-dloxin23478-PentocNorlnated dlbenzofuran123478-Hexachlorlnated dlbenzofuran123678-HexocWorlnated dlbenzofurant23478-Hexoehlorlnoted dlbenzo-p-dloxki123678-Hexachlorlnated dlbenzo-p-dloxln123789-Hexochlarlnated dtoenzo-p-dtoxln234678-Hexochlorinated dlbenzofuran1234678-Heptochlorinated dlbenzofuron1234678-Heptachlorinated dlb«nzo-p-dloxln1234789-Heptochlorlnated dlbenzofuranDctochloriooted dlbenzo—p— dloxinDctochlorinated dlbenzofuran •

Cone.mgAfl)9.8E-62.1 E-52.4E-6 J.6E-6

3.9E-6 JB.4E-6 JPR3.7E-62.5E-66.5E-64.6E-6 JPR3.9E-6 B3.4E-52.0E-42.9E-62.2E-3.1E-4

9.6E-6 (dup)2.1 E-5 (dup)MD (dup)ND (dup)-8E-6 J (dup)

4.2E-6 (dup).9E-6 JPR (dup)

2.1 E-6 (dup)7.1 E-6 (dup)4.6E-6 JPR (dup)ND (dup)MD (dup)2.1E-4 (dup)2.8E-6 (dup)2.4E-3 (dup).1E-4 (dup)

KALAMAZOOCITY

YARDS

KM-7

Depth (ft))-0.5 (S)5-6.5 (R)7-7.5 (S)

3CB Cone.[mgAg)7934I.2

LEGEND

KM-2

NEW BORING FORVISUAL ANALYSIS ONLY

NEW BORING

GRAB SAMPLE

RAILROAD TRACKSAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OFFORMER STRUCTURES

100-

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1"

200*=)200'

NOTES:1. BASE MAP BASED UPON 1973 USGS 7.5

MINUTE SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AND HIGHALTITUDE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN IN1955 AND 1974. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROMSURVEY INFORMATION GENERATED BY BLASLAND,BOUCK & LEE, INC.. LOCATION OF FORMERSTRUCTURES AND LAGOONS APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATION KMS-1 IS NOT SHOWN,SEE FIGURE 14 AND FIGURE 15.

3. SAMPLE LOCATION KMD-1 IS APPROXIMATE.4. SAMPLE RESULTS AS REPORTED BY AQUATEC,

INC., 1994 AND TRIANGLE LABS, 1994.

ND NOT DETECTEDB THE REPORTED VALUE WAS OBTAINED FROM

A READING LESS THAN THE CONTRACTREQUIRED DETECTION LIMIT (CRDL) BUTGREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE INSTRUMENTDETECTION LIMIT (IDL)

J THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIED.HOWEVER THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

PR THE REPORTED CONCENTRATION MAY BEUNDERESTIMATED DUE TO A POORLYRESOLVED GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC PEAK.

(s) SOIL SAMPLE DRAFT FOR(R) RESIDUALS SAMPLE . STATE AND(dup) DUPLICATE FEDERAL

REVIEW

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.£NG/n/£iEWS A SCEN77S75

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC// PORTAGE CREEK /

KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUNO SITETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 15

MILL INVESTIGATIONS

FORMER KINGRESIDUALS/SOIL

PCB AND PCDD/PCDF DATA

FIGURE

12

MM— 1

Depth (ft)10-12 (R)10-12 (R)

PCB Cone.(mg/kg)NDND(dup)

TANKS

f MM-2 1

Depth (ft)11.5-13.5 (S)

PCB Cone.(mg/kg)ND

MM-1, LEGENDNEW BORING


RAILROAD TRACKSAND RIGHT-OF-WAY

FEATURES PRESENT ONLY ON1955 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

FEATURES PRESENT ON1991 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

WATER OR DRAINAGE

KEY:ND NOT DETECTED

(dup) DUPLICATE

(S) SOIL SAMPLE

(R) RESIDUALS SAMPLE

200' 200'


NOTES:

1. BASE MAP PREPARED USING 4/17/91 AND7/12/55 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS. LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM SURVEYINFORMATION (ON STATE PLANE COORDINATESYSTEM) GENERATED BY BLASLAND. BOUCK &LEE, INC.

3. SAMPLE RESULTS AS REPORTED BY AQUETEC,INC., 1994

2/M J4-NES AK6455140VE4M1C03.DWC

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALUED PAPER, INC. / PORTAGE CREEK /


MILL INVESTIGATIONS

FORMER MONARCH MILLRESIDUALS/SOIL

PCB DATA

FIGURE

13

KSHB-1PCB Cone.

D«pth (ft)0-0.5 (SI0.5-1.5 (S/R)

0.37.8

KSHB-9

KSHB-7

Depth (ft)3-0.5 (S)15-1 (S)

"C8 Cone.[mgAg)3.512

KSHB-2»CB Cone.

3-0.51-2 (S/R)

5.84.5

KSHB-7

KSKB-4

3vth (ft)3-0.5 (S)1.5-2.5 (S)

PCB Cone.[mgAg)5.4S.2

.KSHB-8 NEW BORING FOR"TV

-7

KSHB-

3«pth (ft)3-0.5 (S)3-0.5 (S)3.5-1.5 (S/R)

3PCB Cone.(mgAg)I.5l.8(dup)32

1

KSHB-3 A

KSHB-11A-

760-

KINO smer

KMS-1

-3

x19

I I I-——770 ———

VISUAL ANALYSIS ONLY

NEW BORING

GRAB SAMPLE



RAILROAD TRACKS


KSHB-4—-————(

BRICK HEADWALL-

KSHB-5——•

18

KSHB-

Depth (fV)3-0.5 (S)1.5-2.5 (S/R)

6PCB Cone

126.2

——— 770 ———— - —————— ____ _^

—————————————— —————— —— ———— —— —— ,- __

10' X 5' CONCRETECULVERT

PIPE


KMS-1PCB Cone.

Oepth (ft)— (S)— (S)

6.89.2(dup)


NOTES:

1. BASE MAP BY (GOVE ASSOCIATES. INC.. 8/31/89.TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ENVIRONMENTALRESOURCES MANAGEMENT, SHEET 1)

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM SURVEY INFORMATION(ON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM)GENERATED BY BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC..


KEY:(S) SOIL SAMPLE

(R) RESIDUALS SAMPLE

(dup) DUPLICATE


12/M M-MC

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.________ENGINEERS Sc SCIENTISTS_______

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC// PORTAGE CREEK /

KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUNO SITETECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 15

MILL INVESTIGATIONS

KING STREET STORM SEWERRESIDUALS/SOILS PCB DATA

FIGURE

14

KEY:NDN

NOT DETECTEDSPIKED SAMPLE RECOVERY NOT WITHIN CONTROLLIMITSDUPLICATE ANALYSIS NOT WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS.THE COMPOUND OR ANALYTE WAS POSITIVELYIDENTIFIED. HOWEVER, THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICALVALUE IS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.THE ANALYSIS INDICATES THE PRESENCE OFA COMPOUND FOR WHICH THERE IS PRESUMPTIVEEVIDENCE TO MAKE A TENTATIVE IDENTIFICATION.THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUE IS ANESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

B THE REPORTED VALUE WAS OBTAINED FROM AREADING LESS THAN THE CONTRACT REQUIREDDETECTION LIMIT (CRDL) BUT GREATER THAN OREQUAL TO THE INSTRUMENT DETECTION LIMIT (IDL).

(dup) DUPLICATE

JN

KSHB-2

KSHB-4BRICK HEADWAU.



LEGEND-&-KSHB-8 NEW BORING FOR

VISUAL ANALYSIS ONLY^rTv

A.KSHB-1

KMS-1

KIHGSTORM SEWER

B-3

X19

——— 770 ---

NEW BORING

GRAB SAMPLE



EXISTING RAILROAD TRACKS


APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" 40*

NOTES:

f KSHB-5 ^

Compoundacetonevinyl chloride

Depth(ft-)1.5-2.51.5-2.5

VOC Cone(mg/kg)0.012 J0.008 J

VOC Cone.(mg/kg)0.018 J (dup)0.008 J (dup)

r KSHB-5 1

Compoundaldrinalpha-chlordanegamma— chlordone4, 4- DDE

Depth(ft.)1.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.5

Pesticide Cone.(mg/kg)0.023 J0.050.0490.048

Pesticide Cone.(mg/kg)0.023 J (dup)0.042 (dup)0.040 (dup)0.032 JN (dup)

KSHB-5

Compoundanthracenebenzo(a)anthracenebenzo(b)fluoranthenebenzo(k)fluoranthene:>enzo(a)pyrenebutyl benzyl phthalatecarbazolechrysenedibenz(a,h)anthracenebis(2-ethythexyl)phthalateFluorantheneindeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene2-methylnaphthalenenaphthalenephenanthrenepyrene

Depth(ft.).5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5

SVOC Cone.(mg/kg)0.14 J1.32.41.31.30.26 J0.20 J1.30.27 J0.69 J2.7 J0.69 J0.10 J0.080 J1.22.6 }

SVOC Cone.(mg/kg)0.13 J (dup)1.4 (dup)2.3 (dup)1.3 (dup)1.3 (dup)0.17 J (dup)0.20 J (dup)1.2 (dup)0.32 J (dup)0.88 (dup)2.5 J (dupl0.75 J (dupj0.13 J (dupj0.087 J (dup)1.32.7 (dup)

KSHB-5 1

Analytealuminumarsenicjariumjerylliumcadmiumcalciumchromiumcobaltcopperronleadmagnesiummanganesemercurynickelpotassiumseleniumvanadium

Depth(ft)1.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.51.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5.5-2.5

1.5-2.51.5-2.5

TAL Cone.(mg/kg)2000 * J10 *71 BN* J0.45 B JND (1.2 U)5400 * J12 N* J3.8 B25 N* J4300 *210 *1400 J56 N* J0.629.8 BND (310 U)0.42 B5.6 B

TAL Cone.(mg/kg)6900 *J15 *320 N* J0.61 B J2.1 J22000 * J41 N* J5.8 B91 N* J15000 *280 *6100 * J190 N* J1.122430 B0.72 B18

1. BASE MAP BY GOVE ASSOCIATES, INC., 8/31/89(TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ENVIRONMENTALRESOURCES MANAGEMENT. SHEET 1). LOCATIONSARE APPROXIMATE.

2. SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM SURVEYINFORMATION (ON STATE PLANECOORDINATE SYSTEM) GENERATED BYBLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.

3. SAMPLE RESULTS AS REPORTED BY AQUATEC.INC.. 1993, 1994.

12/M S4-AK6490156R/O-KHW/M50IG03AW9

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS_______



______MILL INVESTIGATIONS______KING STREET STORM SEWER

PESTICIDE ANDTCL/TAL DETECTIONS

FIGURE

15

Documents

BBL - DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 15 - REMEDIAL ... · 22.1 Lagoon Samples 7 2.22 Former Wastewater Treatment Structures 8 2.23 Stormwater Conveyances 8 22.4 Additional Samples 8 2.2.5