Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Daria Sokhan University of Glasgow, UK
on behalf of the CLAS Collaboration
MENU2013, Rome, Italy 1st October 2013
Beam Asymmetry measurement in
Pion Photoproduction on the
neutron using CLAS
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Meson Photoproduction
4 invariant complex reaction amplitudes Experimentally, 16 single and double polarisation observables
Meson photoproduction – for pseudo-scalar mesons:
Σ T R
Polarised: Beam Target Recoil
12 double-polarisation observables &
Beam
Recoil
Target
Partial Wave Analysis (PWA) fits to observables are used to extract resonance parameters (angular momentum, parity, etc), eg: SAID, MAID, Bonn-Gatchina…
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
From observables to the resonance spectrum
New measurement of observable
Partial Wave Analyses
Multipoles
World data set, all measured observables
Partial Wave Analyses
Resonance parameters
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Barker, A. Donnachie, J. Storrow, Nucl. Phys. B 95, 347 (1975)
Polarisation Observables
Direction of target polarisation
Component of recoil polarisation measurement
a) Notation: { ; ; }T RP P P
P
TP
RP
Beam polarisation
Linear polarisation at angle θ to scattering plane
( )L
C Circular polarisation
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Barker, A. Donnachie, J. Storrow, Nucl. Phys. B 95, 347 (1975)
Polarisation Observables
Direction of target polarisation
Component of recoil polarisation measurement
a) Notation: { ; ; }T RP P P
P
TP
RP
Beam polarisation
Linear polarisation at angle θ to scattering plane
( )L
C Circular polarisation
Complete measurement requires cross-section, Σ, T, R
and four double-polarisation observables!
W.-T. Chiang and F. Tabakin, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2054 (1997).
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
What makes up a cross-section
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Experiment: linearly polarised beam, unpolarised target
Focus on: Beam Asymmetry Σ
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Measuring Beam Asymmetry
Beam asymmetry, Σ, from linearly polarised photons – crucial observable to constrain PWA.
0(1 cos2 )lin
dP
d
Many wide, overlapping resonances expected to couple to the pion channel. Large cross-section: precision data.
Experiment using CLAS @ JLab – exclusive measurement of Σ in 1.6 < W < 2.3 GeV on a quasi-free neutron :
( )spectatord p p
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
EM interaction does not conserve isospin, so multipole amplitides contain isoscalar and isovector contributions of EM current:
Why neutrons?
0
12 2( )(0) (1) 3
1 1 2
3 3 3
II
p pA A A A
Proton data alone does not allow separation of the isoscalar, A(0), and isovector, A(1), components.
Need data on both proton and neutron!
12 2( )(0) (1) 3
1 1 1 2
3 3 32
II
p nA A A A
0
12 2( )(0) (1) 3
1 1 2
3 3 3
II
n nA A A A
12 2( )(0) (1) 3
1 1 1 2
3 3 32
II
n nA A A A
Proton Neutron
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
CEBAF: Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility:
CLAS @ Jefferson Lab (Virginia, USA)
Duty cycle: ~ 100%
Energy up to ~6 GeV
Electron polarisation up to ~85%
CLAS in Hall B:
Drift chambers
Toroidal magnetic field
Cerenkov Counters
Scintillator Time of Flight
Electromagnetic
Calorimeters
Very large angular coverage – near full azimuthal and 8° to 140°
scattering angle
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
The Photon Beam
Goniometer for tilting radiator
e-
Linearly polarised (up to > 90%) photon beam: bremsstrahlung of unpolarised electrons in a highly ordered crystalline radiator, typically 20 – 50 µm diamond.
Crystal orientation chosen to produce a “coherent” peak of polarised photons at the required energy.
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
The Photon Beam
Goniometer for tilting radiator
“Tagger” – momentum analyses deflected electrons
e- e-
γ
Linearly polarised (up to > 90%) photon beam: bremsstrahlung of unpolarised electrons in a highly ordered crystalline radiator, typically 20 – 50 µm diamond.
Crystal orientation chosen to produce a “coherent” peak of polarised photons at the required energy.
Culprit photon causing reaction can be identified and its energy calculated
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
The Photon Beam
Goniometer for tilting radiator
“Tagger” – momentum analyses deflected electrons
Target within CLAS
e- e-
γ γ
Linearly polarised (up to > 90%) photon beam: bremsstrahlung of unpolarised electrons in a highly ordered crystalline radiator, typically 20 – 50 µm diamond.
Crystal orientation chosen to produce a “coherent” peak of polarised photons at the required energy.
Culprit photon causing reaction can be identified and its energy calculated
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
The g13b Experiment
Experimental run: March – June 2007
Electron energies: 3.3 – 5.2 GeV
Linearly polarised photons produced via coherent bremsstrahlung
Six photon energy settings in range: 1.1 - 2.3 GeV, with
two orthogonal polarisation orientations.
Target: liquid Deuterium
Single charged particle trigger. Total of 3∙1010 events
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
World Data: Σ off the Neutron
… has very few points from the neutron (most data is from proton).
… is in a limited polar-angle and energy range.
Alspector, PRL 28, 1403 (1972). • Abrahamian, SJNP 32, 69 (1980). • Adamyan, JPG 15, 1797 (1989). •Mandaglio, PRC 82, 045209 (2010).
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
World Data: Σ off the Neutron
… has very few points from the neutron (most data is from proton).
… is in a limited polar-angle and energy range.
Our experiment has added ~1180 new data points to the previous
set of 166
Alspector, PRL 28, 1403 (1972). • Abrahamian, SJNP 32, 69 (1980). • Adamyan, JPG 15, 1797 (1989). •Mandaglio, PRC 82, 045209 (2010).
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Reaction Identification
Deuterium target – quasi-free reaction with spectator proton:
Identify the channel: ( , )n p
( )spectatord p p
Cut on “missing mass” – for the spectator proton.
Identify p, π- final state
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Cut on low “missing momentum” below 0.12 GeV where quasi-free contribution dominates.
deuterium p spectatorP P P P P
Cut on proton and pion back-to-back in CMS: coplanarity.
𝑝𝑥 CM angle
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Photon-spotting
Energy of each photon measured by the tagger.
Identify exact photon from timing coincidence – beam in 2 ns bunches.
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Photon-spotting
Energy of each photon measured by the tagger.
Identify exact photon from timing coincidence – beam in 2 ns bunches.
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Measuring the Beam Asymmetry Σ
Reaction axes:
pz
p
p py
p p
in the Centre of Momentum System (CMS)
φ: angle of beam polarisation plane in CMS w.r.t. reaction plane.
Asymmetry from cos(2φ) fit to the φ-distribution of pions:
0(1 cos2 )lin
dP
d
Reaction plane
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
To reduce systematics, beam polarisation plane rotated between two orthogonal directions during experiment.
Σ from fits
At its simplest, fit with:
cos(2 )A B C
Where B = PΣ
𝑁∥ = 𝑁𝜃(1 − 𝑃Σ𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜙)
𝑁⊥ = 𝑁𝜃(1 + 𝑃Σ𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜙)
𝑃Σ𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜙 = 𝑁∥ − 𝑁⊥
𝑁∥ + 𝑁⊥
Actual fit function more complicated, to account for imperfect normalisation, etc…
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
To reduce systematics, beam polarisation plane rotated between two orthogonal directions during experiment.
Σ from fits
At its simplest, fit with:
cos(2 )A B C
Where B = PΣ
𝑁∥ = 𝑁𝜃(1 − 𝑃Σ𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜙)
𝑁⊥ = 𝑁𝜃(1 + 𝑃Σ𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜙)
𝑃Σ𝑐𝑜𝑠2𝜙 = 𝑁∥ − 𝑁⊥
𝑁∥ + 𝑁⊥
Actual fit function more complicated, to account for imperfect normalisation, etc…
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Check of FSI
< 30 MeV “missing momentum” 95 – 120 MeV “missing momentum”
Quasi-free nucleon good approximation to a free nucleon: V. Vegna et al., Chin. Phys. C 33, 1249 (2009),
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
PRELIMINARY !!!
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
• Graal: Madaglio et al, PRC 82 045209 (2010) MAID 07 SAID 11 BoGa 11
Preliminary Σ Measurement: θ > 90º ~ 1/4 of the g13 dataset shown below
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Preliminary Σ Measurement: θ < 90º
MAID 07 SAID 11 BoGa 11
~ 1/4 of the g13 dataset shown below
• Graal: Madaglio et al, PRC 82 045209 (2010)
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
A closer took at discrepancy with GRAAL
Discrepancies too large to be due entirely to systematics!
Different treatment of Fermi momentum?
CLAS data: Fermi-momentum calculated from quasi-exclusive reconstruction of the reaction: 𝛾 + 𝑑 → 𝜋− + 𝑝 + 𝑋. GRAAL data: Fermi momentum reconstructed through an iterative match to a Monte Carlo simulation.
• Graal: Madaglio et al, PRC 82 045209 (2010)
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
Incompatible bins?
The beam asymmetry varies dramatically with the angle – slight differences in the composition of the bin may yield significant differences in Σ
Reasons for CLAS – GRAAL discrepancy under investigation!
c2 from SAID-09 PWA
fit including GRAAL data: 89
c2 from SAID-09 PWA
fit including g13 data, but not GRAAL: 2.6
A closer took at discrepancy with GRAAL
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
PRELIMINARY !!!
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
In Conclusion…
A sizeable asymmetry changing rapidly both with scattering angle and energy can be observed.
Comparison with the most recent PWA predictions shows significant differences in certain W regions. Inclusion of preliminary data into SAID09 PWA gave a good c2
Discrepancy with Graal measurement under investigation. Greatly expanded the sparse world data set on the neutron with > 1000
additional points
Will aid in constraining amplitudes of PWAs, en route to a “complete measurement” of polarisation observables.
Beam Asymmetry Σ measured in range 1.6 < W < 2.3 GeV, for the channel ( )spectatord p p
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013
LPSC, Grenoble – 21 April 2011 Daria Sokhan
THANK YOU !
MENU2013, Rome, Italy – 1st Oct 2013