View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Beamline-to-MICE Matching
Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford
2 August 2004 • MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam• JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin Tilley)• Software, beam momentum and coil currents
manipulation • Results, cooling of the actual ISIS beam
Cooling a Gaussian beam
• Beam in the middle of the upstream spectrometer: = 6 mm rad<p> = 200 MeV/c = 33 cm
• Gaussian distributions: x = 3.3 cm
px = 20 MeV/c
• Coils from Mice Note 49:about 15% cooling
LH
spectrometersz (m)
(
m r
ad)
ISIS beam• Simulations of the MICE channel performed with ICOOL• Beamline designed by Kevin Tilley with TURTLE
• Latest beam design: JUNE04 • Pb diffuser is 8 mm thick
• Turtle-Icool interface planes: a) Middle of upstream spectrometerb) After Pb diffuser, prior to solenoidc) After Q9, prior to Pb and solenoid
• Work in progress:a) Interface Turtle-Icool midway between Q6-Q7 b) Simulate the entire beamline with Icool
Beamline layout
• MICE beamline (NOT TO SCALE !!!)
Q7 Q8 Q9
Quadrupole triplet
Drift
Pb diffuser 0.8 cm
Solenoid & Spectrometer
LHFocus coil
TURTLE – ICOOL INTERFACES
Beam design concept (1)MICE wants……
x/y
x’/y’
2. Particular input emittance RQD
qB
p
x
xxx
20
'max
max
1. Matched beam
…. at matching point (4T Spec Solenoid)
Beam design concept (2)Scheme to provide simultaneously:-
This is the driving Design Concept in this design work:
To use ‘Beamsize’ & ‘Scatterer thickness’ to provide both beam matching, & required emittance generation.
200 2
1 RQD
0
00
0
00
1. Focus Beam with
x/y
x’/y’
MICE ACCEPTANCE A
0, 00 beamR
2. &
Matched after passing thru’ required scatterer
RQD 0, match
2
[Above figure illustrates case match region immediately follows scatterer]
JUNE04 beam
• Beam is not cylindrically symmetric at Q9, far from Gaussian…
• Designed to achieve = 33 cm and = 0 in spectrometer solenoid
• Central momentum of ‘useful’ beam p = 236 MeV/c
• Design emittance y ONLY = 6 mm rad • This means:
(<pz> / mc) y y’ sqrt(1-r2) = 6 mm rad
Beam at Q9 (1)
ptot (GeV/c)py (GeV/c)px (GeV/c)
x (m) y (m)
Beam at Q9 (2)
• Beam is everything but Gaussian
• Top: x – pz correlation
• Bottom:a) <x> is not 0
b) px is asymmetric
x (m)
x (m) px (GeV/c)
pz (GeV/c)
x – pz correlation
• Correlation after Q9• Disappears after Pb
scatterer and inside spectrometer
265 MeV/c
x (m)
p z (
GeV
/c)
Cooling (1)
• Ideal Gaussian beam• JUNE04 beam
Designed assuming that the optics of the cooling channel were optimised for a central momentum of:<p> = 200 MeV/c
• Interface Turtle – Icool: centre of upstream solenoid
• Transmission = 80% • COOLING = ???
z (m)
(
m r
ad)
A few steps
• MICE channel designed for pcentral = 200 MeV/c
• Beam at Q9 designed to provide <p> = 236 MeV/c, due to A2 – p correlation
Steps:• Scale ALL coil currents in the
MICE channel by 236/207• Include Pb diffuser in Icool• Propagate Turtle beam from
Q9 into centre of spectrometer • Inside upstream spectrometer,
select ONLY events with ptot within 5% of 236 MeV/c
ptot
CUT
ptot (GeV/c)
B-field in Icool
• Fringe field from Q9 not included in Icool simulation
• Bz from solenoid ‘almost’ zero at Q9
• Pb scatterer inside fringe field from solenoid
• Bz in solenoid >> 4 T
Q9
Pb
z (m)
Bz
(T)
Icool vs. Turtle
• ptot in the centre of the upstream spectrometer:
a) Icool
b) Turtle
Note: Turtle uses thin lens approximation for solenoid fringe field
ptot (GeV/c)
Longitudinal momentum
• JUNE04 beam, all events
• JUNE04 beam with ptot cut
z (m)
<p z
> (
GeV
/c)
Cooling (2)
• JUNE04 beam, all events
• JUNE04 beam with ptot cut
z (m)
(
m r
ad)
Cooling (3)• Ideal Gaussian beam = 15.8%
Transmission = 98.6%
• JUNE04 beam = 11.1%
Transmission = 72.8%
• 7,075 after Q9• 5,412 total in upstream
spectrometer• Of these, 1,543 pass the cut
on ptot• 1,124 left in downstream
spectrometer z (m)
(
m r
ad)
Beta functions
• Gaussian beam, starting in upstream solenoid
• JUNE04 beam, all events
• JUNE04 beam with ptot cut
z (m)
(
m)
Conclusions• MICE coils and JUNE04 beam need some more work
• We have an actual beam + cooling channel design that works !!!
• Beamline: a) Reduce central momentum to
<p> = 207 MeV/cb) Have central momentum in the centre
of the ptot distribution, not in the tailc) More interface planes Turtle-Icool
• Keep an eye on event rate: 1,124 + / 7,075 + = 15.9% !!!