Upload
keypat
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
1/30
Chapter 9
CapitalStructure
2005 Thomson/South-Western
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
2/30
2
The Target Capital Structure
Capital Structure: The combination ofdebt and equity used to finance a firm
Target Capital Structure: The ideal mix
of debt, preferred stock, and commonequity with which the firm plans tofinance its investments
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
3/30
3
The Target Capital Structure
Four factors that influence capital structuredecisions:
The firms business risk
The firms tax position Financial flexibility
Managerial attitude
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
4/30
4
What is Business Risk?
Uncertainty about future operating income
(EBIT).
How well can we predict operating income?
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
5/30
5
Sales variability
Input price variability
Ability to adjust output prices for changesin input prices
The extent to which costs are fixed:
operating leverage
Factors AffectingBusiness Risk
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
6/30
6
What is Operating Leverage?
Operating Leverage: Use of fixed operatingcosts rather than variable costs
If most costs are fixed (i.e., they do not
decline when demand falls) then the firm hashigh DOL (degree of operating leverage)
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
7/30
7
What is Financial Risk?
Financial Leverage: The extent to whichfixed-income securities (debt and preferredstock) are used in a firms capital structure
Financial Risk: Additional risk placed onstockholders as as result of financialleverage
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
8/30
8
Business Risk vs. Financial Risk
Business risk depends on business factorssuch as competition, product liability, andoperating leverage.
Financial risk depends only on type ofsecurities issued: the more debt, the morefinancial risk.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
9/30
9
Determining theOptimal Capital Structure:
Seek to maximize the price of the firmsstock.
Changes in use of debt will cause changes inearnings per share, and, thus, in the stock
price. Cost of debt varies with capital structure.
Financial leverage increases risk.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
10/30
10
EPS Indifference Analysis
EPS Indifference Point:The level of sales at which EPS will bethe same whether the firm uses debt
or common stock (pure equity)financing.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
11/30
11
Probability
Density
0 $2.40 $3.36
50% Debt Financing
Zero Debt Financing
EPS ($)
Probability Distribution ofEPS with Different AmountsofFinancial Leverage
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
12/30
12
The Effect of Capital Structureon Stock Prices and the Cost
of CapitalThe optimal capital structure
maximizes the price of a firms stock.
The optimal capital structure alwayscalls for a debt/assets ratio that islower than the one that maximizesexpected EPS.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
13/30
13
Debt/Assets
kd ExpectedEPS
EstimatedBeta
ks = [kRF +
(kM kRF)Fs]
EstimatedPrice
ResultingP/E Ratio
WACC
0% - $2.40 1.50 12.0% $20.00 8.33 12.00%
10 8.0% 2.56 1.55 12.2 20.98 8.20 11.4620 8.3 2.75 1.65 12.6 21.83 7.94 11.08
30 9.0 2.97 1.80 13.2 22.50 7.58 10.86
40 10.0 3.20 2.00 14.0 22.86 7.14 10.80
50 12.0 3.36 2.30 15.2 22.11 6.58 11.20
60 15.0 3.30 2.70 16.8 19.64 5.95 12.12
All earnings paid out as dividends, so EPS = DPS.Assume that kRF = 6% and kM = 10%. Tax rate = 40%.
WACC = wdkd(1 - T) + wsks
= (D/A) kd(1 - T) + (1 - D/A)ks
At D/A = 40%, WACC = 0.4[(10%)(1-.4)] + 0.6(14%) = 10.80%
Stock Price and Cost of Capital Estimateswith Different Debt/Assets Ratios
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
14/30
14
Relationship BetweenCapital Structure and EPSEPS
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Maximum EPS = $3.36Expected EPS ($)
Debt/Assets (%)
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
15/30
15
0
5
10
15
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Cost of Equity, ks
Cost ofCapital (%)
Debt/Assets (%)
WACC
Minimum = 10.8%
Relationship BetweenCapital Structure and Cost of CapitalCost of Capital
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
16/30
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Maximum = $22.86
StockPrice ($)
Debt/Assets (%)
Relationship BetweenCapital Structure and Stock PriceStock Price
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
17/30
17
Percentage change in NOI
Percentage change in sales
(EBIT
EBIT
(Sales
Sales
(EBIT
EBIT
(Q
Q
DOL = = =
DOLQ =Q(P - V)
Q(P - V) - FC
DOLS =S - VC
S - VC - F
Gross Profit
EBIT=
Degree of Operating Leverage(DOL)
The percentage change in operating income (EBIT)
associated with a given percentage change in sales.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
18/30
18
(EPS
EPS
(EBIT
EBIT
Percentage change in EPSPercentage change in EBIT
EBITEBIT - Int
DFL = = =
Degree ofFinancial Leverage(DFL)
The percentage change in earnings availableto common stockholders associated with agiven percentage change in EBIT.
This equation assumes the firm has no preferred stock.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
19/30
19
S - VC
S - VC - F - IntGross Profit
EBIT - IntDTL = =
Q(P - V)Q(P - V) - F - Int
DTL =
DTL = DOL X DFL
Degree of Total Leverage(DTL)
The percentage change in EPS that results
from a given percentage change in sales.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
20/30
20
Liquidity and Capital StructureDifficulties with Analysis
1. We cannot determine exactly how either P/E ratiosor equity capitalization rates (ks values) are affectedby different degrees of financial leverage.
2. Managers may be more or less conservative thanthe average stockholder, so management may set adifferent target capital structure than the one thatwould maximize the stock price.
3. Managers of large firms have a responsibility toprovide continuous service and must refrain fromusing leverage to the point where the firms long-run viability is endangered.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
21/30
21
Liquidity and Capital Structure
Financial strength indicator
Times-Interest-Earned (TIE) Ratio
Ratio that measures the firms ability to meet
its annual interest obligationsFormula: divide EBIT (earnings before interest
and taxes) by interest charges
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
22/30
22
Capital Structure Theory
Trade-off Theory
Signaling Theory
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
23/30
23
Trade-Off Theory(Modigliani and Miller)
1. Theory:
1. Interest is tax-deductible expense, therefore less expensivethan common or preferred stock.
2. So, 100% debt is the preferred capital structure.
2. Theory:
1. Interest rates rise as debt/asset ratio increases2. Tax rates fall at high debt levels (lowers debt tax shield)
3. Probability of bankruptcy increases as debt/assets ratioincreases.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
24/30
24
Trade-Off Theory (continued)
3. Two levels of debt:
1. Threshold debt level (D/A1) = where bankruptcy costsbecome material
2. Optimal debt level (D/A2) = where marginal tax shelterbenefits = marginal bankruptcyrelated costs
3. Between these two debt levels, the firms stock price rises,but at a decreasing rate
4. So, the optimal debt level = optimal capitalstructure
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
25/30
25
Trade-Off Theory (cont)
4. Theory and empirical evidence supportthese ideas, but the points cannot beidentified precisely.
5. Many large, successful firms use much lessdebt than the theory suggestsleading todevelopment of signaling theory.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
26/30
26
Signaling Theory
Symmetric Information Investors and managers have identical
information about the firms prospects.
Asymmetric Information
Managers have better information about theirfirms prospects than do outside investors.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
27/30
27
Signaling Theory
Signal
An action taken by a firms management thatprovides clues to investors about howmanagement views the firms prospects
Result: Reserve Borrowing CapacityAbility to borrow money at a reasonable cost when
good investment opportunities arise Firms often use less debt than optimal to ensure
that they can obtain debt capital later if needed.
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
28/30
28
Variations in CapitalStructures among Firms
Wide variations in use of financial leverageamong industries and firms within anindustry TIE (times interest earned ratio) measures how
safe the debt is: percentage of debt
interest rate on debt
companys profitability
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
29/30
29
Co try ity otal e t Lo g- erm
e t
hort- erm
e t
United Kingdom 68.3 31.7 N/ N/
United tates 48.4 51.6 26.8 24.8
anada 47.5 52.5 30.2 22.7
Germany 39.7 60.3 15.6 44.7 pain 39.7 60.3 22.1 38.2
rance 38.8 61.2 23.5 37.7Japan 33.7 66.3 23.3 43.0
Italy 23.5 76.5 24.2 52.3
Capital Structure Percentages for Selected CountriesRanked by Common Equity Ratios, 1995
Capital Structures Around the World
8/8/2019 BeasleyCh9 v2
30/30
30
Before Next Class:
1.Review Chapter 9 material
2.Do Chapter 9 homework3.Prepare for Chapter 9 quiz4.Read Chapter 10