43
MWEA Annual Conference June 2016 BECOMING A WRRF A STEPWISE PROCESS Mike Harvey, PE

BECOMING A WRRF A STEPWISE PROCESS - mi-wea.org · June 2016 BECOMING A WRRF A STEPWISE PROCESS Mike Harvey, PE ... 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 World Phosphate Rock Production

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

MWEA Annual Conference June 2016

BECOMING A WRRF A STEPWISE PROCESS

Mike Harvey, PE

Why now? – Drivers

Opportunities for Wastewater Utilities

Where to Start – A Stepwise Approach

Midwest Examples

Take Aways

Agenda

Why now? – Drivers

1. Shifting and Growing Population

Issue 1: Nutrient sources

Issue 2: Global nutrient balance(or imbalance!)

– High input, limited recycling

2. Nutrients – P and N

Bouwman et al (2005) Pedosphere 15(2): 137-155

Adding a LOT more nutrients to the environment

Environmental imbalance of nutrients

Environmental Input

Lake Taihu, China

2. Nutrients – Phosphorus

0.0E+00

5.0E+07

1.0E+08

1.5E+08

2.0E+08

2.5E+08

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

World Phosphate

Rock Production

(metric tons)

Phosphate Rock: Non-renewable resource

Phosphate production has steadily increased

2. Nutrients – Nitrogen

Nitrogen limitation

Haber-Bosch: large natural gas

requirement

3. Climate Change

Archer and Stefan (2010) The Climate Crisis

4. Water Sources

Archer and Stefan (2010) The Climate Crisis

Red: Less Water

Blue: More water

Resource Nexus: The Environmental Challenge of the 21st Century

Opportunities for Wastewater Utilities

Opportunities for Wastewater Utilities

Driver Wastewater Utilities

World population increase and shift Fertilizer production

Nutrients Lower effluent nutrient requirements Economics of recovery Be paid for product

Climate change and Energy Reduced energy usage GHG emissions Power generation

Water sources Water quality protection and water reuse

Resource Recovery Facilities

– Nutrient recovery

– Energy independence

– Water reuse

Past: meet permit

Future: recovering valuable resources while maintaining water quality standards

N-E-W Paradigm

WEF believes that wastewater treatment plants are NOT waste disposal facilities, but rather water resource recovery facilities that produce clean water, recover nutrients (such as phosphorus and nitrogen), and have the potential to reduce the nation’s dependence upon fossil fuel through the production and use of renewable energy.

Change our Mind(set)

clean water recover nutrients

renewable energy

Utility of the Future

The Water Resources Utility of the Future: A Blueprint for Action (NACWA, WERF, and WEF)

“Clean water utilities are undergoing a

remarkable transformation. They are evolving from wastewater treatment plants to resource recovery facilities…

Delivering maximum environmental benefits at the least cost to society”

Treating Wastewater: Responding to the “New Normal”

Preliminary Treatment

Raw Wastewater

Solids Treatment & Resource Recovery

Biosolids Handling & Market Resources

Primary Treatment

Secondary Treatment

Advanced Treatment

Tertiary Treatment

Disinfection

Outfall

Receiving Water Body

ENERGY FACTORY

NUTRIENT FACTORY

WATER FACTORY

Waste Streams Value Streams

Where to start – A Stepwise Approach

How Do We Get There?

Stepwise process

Incremental steps that make sense now

Establish vision for the future

Reduce resource use

Energy Roadmap Purpose

To help utility managers effectively plan and implement efforts to enhance energy sustainability

Build off of the wealth of existing information

The WEF Energy Roadmap

ENABLE OPTIMIZE INTEGRATE

Strategic Management

Organizational Culture

Communication and Outreach

Demand Side Management

Energy Generation

Innovating for the Future

Develop strategy

Develop message Continuously evolve efforts

Evaluate existing

Research, partner, mitigate

Full-scale solutions

Understand baseline

Detailed evaluation Implement changes

Develop goal/ strategy

Implement generation

Maximize value

Set goal Gather support Prioritize and implement

Develop vision, Team

Communicate, take action

Empower Team and staff

Strategic Management

Strategic Direction ● Financial Viability ● Collaborative Partnerships ● Towards Carbon Neutrality

Possible Goals

•75% energy produced onsite

•20% energy conservation

•90% energy from renewables

•50% employees on public transportation

Time

Ene

rgy

Use

Organizational Culture

Energy Vision ● Energy Team ● Staff Development & Alignment

Energy

Champion Regulatory

Compliance

Maintenance

Staff

Planning

Staff

Engineering

Staff

Operations

Staff

Demand Side Management

• Review Data – 2 years of bills

• Analyze Costs – Energy charges

– Demand charges

– Rate structure

• Make Changes – Rate structure

– Shift loads

Electricity Costs and Billing ● Power Measurement & Control ● Energy Management ● Source Control

Rate

Schedule

Energy Demand Costs =

$2.65000/kW -$11.79000/kW

Energy Usage

Costs= $0.08351/kWh -

$0.13965/kWh

Total Electric Costs =

Time of Use

(TOU) Charges

Billing Period

(1)

(1)

(2) (2)

(3)

(4)

Demand Side Management

Analyze Baseline Energy Use

Benchmarking by Process

Real-time control

Electricity Costs and Billing ● Power Measurement & Control ● Energy Management ● Source Control

Other (1%)Primary (3%)

Pumping

(15%)

Solids Handling (8%)

Lighting &

Buildings

(10%)

Anaerobic

Digestion

(12%)

Activated

Sludge

(51%)

Demand Side Management

Energy Audit

Implement Changes

Incorporate Energy into Future Designs

Electricity Costs and Billing ● Power Measurement & Control ● Energy Management ● Source Control

Reduce Energy Use of Key Equipment By:

Shutting down

Operate part time

Operate with variable speed

Operate at lower flows

Operate at lower pressures

Replace with more efficient equipment

CIP Based Plan

$262

,971

$222

,971

$222

,971

$299

,609

$299

,609

$90,

141

$20,

211

$0 $0

$2,2

08,6

90

$2,2

08,6

90

$2,2

08,6

90

$1,5

57,3

60

$1,5

17,3

60

$1,5

17,3

60

$1,3

87,0

94

$1,1

91,6

95

$866

,030

$0

$500,000

$1,000,000

$1,500,000

$2,000,000

$2,500,000

$3,000,000

0

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

AnnualEnergy

Cost($)

Energy(kWh)

Purchased Electricity BG Electricity Purchased NG BG Heat Electricity Cost NG Cost

Example: Sheboygan

2013: Average 90% of energy

produced on site

Stepwise example: Energy Efficiency, HSW, and Biogas Utilization Projects

Biosolids Dryer

Digestion and CHP II

Aeration II

CHP I

Heat Utilization

Aeration I

RWW Pumping 2005

2011

HSW Program

2006

2010

2013

Stepwise example: Energy Efficiency, HSW, and Biogas Utilization Projects

Biosolids Dryer

Digestion and CHP II

Aeration II

CHP I

Heat Utilization

Aeration I

RWW Pumping 2005

2011

HSW Program

2006

2010

2013

Motors and VFDs

Diffusers and High-Efficiency

Blowers

Stepwise example: Energy Efficiency, HSW, and Biogas Utilization Projects

Biosolids Dryer

Digestion and CHP II

Aeration II

CHP I

Heat Utilization

Aeration I

RWW Pumping 2005

2011

HSW Program

2006

2010

2013

10 x 30-kW Microturbines

Biogas Boilers + Piping Mods

Stepwise example: Energy Efficiency, HSW, and Biogas Utilization Projects

Biosolids Dryer

Digestion and CHP II

Aeration II

CHP I

Heat Utilization

Aeration I

RWW Pumping 2005

2011

HSW Program

2006

2010

2013

Automatic DO Control

Stepwise example: Energy Efficiency, HSW, and Biogas Utilization Projects

Biosolids Dryer

Digestion and CHP II

Aeration II

CHP I

Heat Utilization

Aeration I

RWW Pumping 2005

2011

HSW Program

2006

2010

2013

LM Digester Mixers

2 x 200-kW Microturbines

Stepwise example: Energy Efficiency, HSW, and Biogas Utilization Projects

Biosolids Dryer

Digestion and CHP II

Aeration II

CHP I

Heat Utilization

Aeration I

RWW Pumping 2005

2011

HSW Program

2006

2010

2013

Medium Temperature

Belt Dryer

Example Sheboygan: HSW and CHP II Dramatically Reduced Electricity Purchases

1760 1700

1200

400 450

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

WFE 2003 2010 2012 2013

Purchased Electricity

(kWh/Mgal)

75%

Resource Recovery in the Midwest

Opportunity : Improve Blower Reliability, Operating Efficiency and Turndown

25% Reduction In Blower Energy Use Turndown to Lowest Operating Requirement

Replacement of Aging Equipment

Example Battle Creek: Provide Air More Efficiently

Anticipated Savings:

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

7,000,000

8,000,000

Current System Improved System

Esti

mat

ed

An

nu

al k

Wh

Additional 1,420,000 kWh

per year

45% Total Reduction in Aeration Energy Use

Total estimated savings of $220,000 annually

Example Battle Creek: Combined Blower and Control Savings

Example: City of Janesville WWTF; Janesville, WI

19 mgd municipal plant (Avg. flow 13.5 mgd)

130,000 cfd of biogas produced

Gas Compression/Moisture Removal

Siloxane Removal

Carbon Dioxide Removal

BioCNG™ System produces vehicle fuel

Turbines Producing 460KW

Unison Solutions

Example: Dayton Creating Pipeline Quality Methane from Biogas

Example: Madison Struvite Harvesting

Calumet WRP – 430 mgd

Public/Private Partnership

Selected Illinois American

Reuse to industrial users

American will build and own distribution system

Buy water from MWRD, sell to industry

Example: MWRD

Embrace the opportunity

Lots of great resources

Set a goal

Gain buy-in from staff/leaders

Keep it simple at first

Don’t overlook operational changes

Use savings to fund future projects

Look for rebates

Take Away

Thank you!

Mike Harvey, PE Donohue & Associates | 312.405.7965 | [email protected]

Any questions